docs(book): the four chapters — Phase 5 slice 2 #3
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "docs/book"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Phase 5 slice 2 (
MODULE_SYSTEM.md§2.11.1). Docs half: docs#146. Either order.The book, written out of the tree slice 1 proved. Four chapters in the order the work happens.
module.json,register(ctx, api), the schema fragment, the client chunk, packaging, boundaries.The four decisions, all as recommended
template/README.mdstays the reference; chapter 1 is the narration. The README travels with a copied template and CI holds it against the tree, so it keeps the tree diagram, the build commands and the rename checklist. Chapter 1 links to it and spends its length on what you should see — the log lines, the four URLs, the state you land in, the four ways it fails.link/andservuo-plugins/move for their own reasons, andcheckLinks.jsalready forbids commit permalinks, so a line number in this book is wrong the moment they do. The template stays the only code quoted verbatim.scripts/checkChapterPaths.js.The new check
Every path a chapter names in backticks must exist. None of those mentions is a markdown link, so
checkLinks.jsnever looked at them; none is code, so nothing else did either. Renaming one template file would have left four chapters quietly pointing at nothing.Its anchor list is stated, not derived from the tree — the same rule the template's own build guard states (API §3.6). A derived list cannot fail when what it derives from changes: rename
template/and a derived anchor set stops checking everytemplate/…mention at exactly the moment they all became wrong. So the anchors are written down, and an anchor that matches nothing fails the build.Eleven tests, and every "must not catch" case is a span that really appears in the book: a path in another repo, a placeholder shape, a command line, a fenced listing of the reader's own future tree. Proved to fire end-to-end as well as in its suite:
stripFencesmoved toscripts/lib/markdown.jsand both checks now use it — shared code, not a shared description.Chapter 1 was run, not reasoned about
The template was copied into a real core on
edge, booted against the dev database, and every claim in "What you should see" checked: the five log lines,/examplegame/statuswith its injected<script type="module" src="/modules/examplegame/entry.js">, the chunk servedno-cachewhilemodule.json404s,/api/v1/public/world/status, the capabilities in/api/v1/public/modules, and the route present in the merged/api/docs.json.Then the three failures the chapter tells a reader to cause on purpose — because a chapter that predicts the wrong debugging heuristic is worse than one that predicts none:
register, "declared public/extra but never registered it" — routes404, absent from/api/v1/public/modulesschema, at load time, before anything mountsonBoot503 Module unavailable, not absentAll three came out exactly as written, and the chapter now quotes those messages. Two corrections fell out of the run: the log sample shows the real interleaving of core's three lines with the module's two, and the failure section gains the check that needs no login — a module disappears from
/api/v1/public/modulesin every failure case.Cleaned up afterwards: module removed from
website/modules/, smoke table dropped,websitetree clean.Checks
The
templatejob is untouched by this PR and should stay green against the pinned core.The book, written out of the tree slice 1 proved. Four chapters in the order the work happens: the first module in twenty minutes, the website module, the sidecar, and the game-side plugin. Shape, settled with the org lead: * template/README.md stays the REFERENCE — it travels with a copied template and CI holds it against the tree — and chapter 1 is the narration: what you should see after each step, the state your module lands in, and the four ways it fails. The chapter links to the checklist rather than restating it. * chapters 3 and 4 cite link/ and servuo-plugins/ by FILE AND IDENTIFIER, never by line. Those repositories move for their own reasons and checkLinks already forbids commit permalinks, so a line number in this book is wrong the moment they do. The template stays the only code quoted verbatim. * one PR: the outline's status table and the link check are only coherent when the whole set lands. scripts/checkChapterPaths.js is the anti-rot half a machine can answer: every path a chapter names in backticks must exist. None of those mentions is a markdown link, so checkLinks never looked at them, and none is code, so nothing else did either — renaming one template file would have left four chapters quietly pointing at nothing. Its anchor list is STATED rather than derived from the tree, for the reason the template's own build guard states it: a list derived from what exists cannot fail when what exists changes, and an anchor that stops matching is a check that has silently stopped checking. So each anchor must exist or the check fails. Eleven tests, every "must not catch" case a span that really appears in the book. stripFences moved to scripts/lib/markdown.js and both checks use it — shared code, not a shared description. CHAPTER 1 WAS RUN, NOT REASONED ABOUT. The template was copied into a real core on edge, booted against the dev database, and every claim in "what you should see" checked: the five log lines, /examplegame/status with its injected <script type="module" src="/modules/examplegame/entry.js">, the chunk served no-cache while module.json 404s, /api/v1/public/world/status, the capabilities in /api/v1/public/modules, and the route in the merged /api/docs.json. Then the three failures the chapter tells a reader to cause on purpose, because a chapter that predicts the wrong debugging heuristic is worse than one that predicts none: * an undeclared prefix -> stage `register`, "declared public/extra but never registered it", routes 404 and absent from /public/modules; * a table without the id prefix -> stage `schema`, at LOAD time, before mounting; * a throwing onBoot -> after mounting, so the same route answers 503 "Module unavailable" rather than vanishing. All three came out exactly as written, and the messages in the chapter are that core's own. Two small corrections fell out of the run: the log sample now shows the real interleaving of core's three lines with the module's two, and the section on failure adds that a module disappears from /api/v1/public/modules in every failure case — a check that needs no login. MODULE_SYSTEM.md 2.11.1 slice 2. Docs half: docs#146. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>