chore: repository scaffolding

The org's standard furniture for a new repo: licence, code of conduct, security
policy, contributing guide, issue and pull-request templates, and the ignore
rules. No module yet — that arrives as the first pull request, so this branch
exists to open one against.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016wDDVXWMDz82WqE1i969r4

.gitea/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+---
+name: Bug report
+about: Report something that is broken or behaving unexpectedly
+title: "[bug] "
+labels:
+  - bug
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+<!-- A clear, concise description of the bug. -->
+
+## Steps to reproduce
+
+1.
+2.
+3.
+
+## Expected behavior
+
+<!-- What you expected to happen. -->
+
+## Actual behavior
+
+<!-- What actually happened. Include exact error messages and logs if you have them. -->
+
+## Environment
+
+- Component / repo:
+- Version or commit:
+- OS / runtime (Node, core version, browser…):
+- Deployment (Docker Compose, local dev, bare metal…):
+
+## Additional context
+
+<!-- Screenshots, config (with secrets redacted), anything else that helps. -->
+
+<!--
+  Security issue? Do NOT file it here. See SECURITY.md and email
+  whitlocktech@gmail.com instead.
+-->

.gitea/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+blank_issues_enabled: true
+contact_links:
+  - name: Security vulnerability
+    url: https://gitea.whitlocktech.com/RunicGateway/Module-Rust/src/branch/main/SECURITY.md
+    about: Please do not open a public issue for security problems — report them privately by email instead (see SECURITY.md).

.gitea/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+---
+name: Feature request
+about: Suggest an idea, enhancement, or new capability
+title: "[feature] "
+labels:
+  - enhancement
+---
+
+## Problem / motivation
+
+<!-- What are you trying to do? What's missing or painful today? -->
+
+## Proposed solution
+
+<!-- What you'd like to see happen. -->
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+<!-- Other approaches you thought about, and why you prefer the one above. -->
+
+## Additional context
+
+<!-- Mockups, links, related issues, affected component/repo, etc. -->