Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
285db0baa7 feat(rust): notifications and engagement (phase 10, protocol 7)
Registers the engagement set R7 put in v1: thirteen triggers, four push
streams, three audiences, four bodies (two triggers, email and in-app)
and thirteen disabled rules in seven groups (PLAN.md §25, D59-D68).

The raid alert goes to everyone authorised on the tool cupboard, one
emit per linked person with ownerUserId, so the owner ceiling holds per
emit. It covers doors and walls (protocol 7), never names the raider,
alerts nobody when there is no cupboard, and carries ownerOnline so
"offline only" is the seeded rule's condition rather than code.

The fan-out runs off ingest before a frame is applied, since applying a
disband deletes the roster the notice is sent to. A replayed event is
told only while it is news: 15 minutes for broadcasts, 24 hours for
personal and staff events. Dedupe keys come from the event, not the
sidecar's row id. Server online/offline and a new kills leader are
in-memory transitions, never on first sight, and a tie is not a lead.
A login with no approval within a minute becomes a staff notice via a
query, so a restart loses nothing.

Also fixes a phase-4 gap (D68): the refresh now asks /health, so a game
that hung, or whose bridge was unloaded, while the sidecar stayed up no
longer reads as online. It stops naming players as online, and a stale
board no longer moves "last seen".

engagement-triggers.json is the committed freeze of all of it, checked
in CI with line endings normalised. The check was verified by breaking
it both ways.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E14m6SuuY6i1vASFeGDBeY
2026-09-23 06:06:19 -05:00
b33d21d71b feat(ci): packaging, release and the frozen manifest
All checks were successful
PR Checks / server-tests (pull_request) Successful in 21s
PR Checks / client-build (pull_request) Successful in 21s
PR Checks / frozen-manifest (pull_request) Successful in 39s
Phase 2 of docs/modules/rust/PLAN.md. Phase 1 built five guards and ran them by
hand; this repo had no workflows at all, so nothing gated the branch that gets
released and there was no way to release it.

Three pieces:

- **release.yml** — the derived-version engine link, installer and Module-uo
  already run (conventional-commit subjects since the newest tag; module.json's
  version survives as a floor; workflow_dispatch as the backdoor), assembling the
  bundle from an include list and publishing the tarball, the install manifest
  carrying its sha256, and SHA256SUMS. The tag is the number that ships and CI
  stamps it into the bundle's own module.json.
- **pr-checks.yml** — server tests, check:imports, check:bundle, check:swagger,
  the client build, client tests and check:externals, plus frozen-manifest.
- **frozen-manifest** — clones core at the sha pinned in ci/core-ref.json,
  generates its route table without this module and with it, and takes the
  difference. It ran locally against that exact ref: six routes, all documented,
  no core route moved. That is the first proof by a running core that /rust
  collides with nothing — phase 1 could only check it by reading, because core
  mounts /status and /version at a tier root where the loader's own collision
  probe cannot see them.

The bundle carries no node_modules, because the shipped half declares no runtime
dependencies (org lead, phase 2). checkBundle.js holds both halves of that: the
include list still covers everything server/index.js reaches, and no dependency
has appeared without the release learning to pack it. Verified by breaking it —
dropping "model" from the list names the exact edit and exits 1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016wDDVXWMDz82WqE1i969r4
2026-09-16 02:10:07 -05:00
883438009d chore: repository scaffolding
The org's standard furniture for a new repo: licence, code of conduct, security
policy, contributing guide, issue and pull-request templates, and the ignore
rules. No module yet — that arrives as the first pull request, so this branch
exists to open one against.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016wDDVXWMDz82WqE1i969r4
2026-09-15 19:53:44 -05:00