feat(shard): ingest protocol 5 — decay schedule, vendor fees, login result

The website half of the protocol-5 bump. Engagement Phase 10.

Schema — twelve columns and two indexes.

shard_houses gains next_stage, estimated_collapse, decay_period_sec and
dynamic_decay. estimated_collapse is nullable and stays null far more often than
not, deliberately: under dynamic decay ServUO draws each stage at random on entry,
so collapse is knowable only at IDOC. A null means "not knowable", never "not yet
read".

shard_vendors gains owner_acct plus seven fee columns and an index on dismissal_at.
owner_acct is the structural one — the table has carried owner_name since protocol
3, but a character name joins to nothing, and only the game account reaches
shard_account_links. Until now a vendor row named an owner the site could not
resolve to a person. dismissal_at + owner_acct are what let Phase 11's
uo.vendor.expiring find "vendors about to be dismissed" and turn each into a
person, without scanning every shop.

Ingest.

Both new field groups arrive NESTED and are flattened into columns on the way in,
then re-nested on the way out — the same trick shardMarket already uses for
`location`. That is not stylistic: the visibility projection matches literal JSON
keys, so the stored read model and the live wire frame have to spell a group
identically or one admin rule covers only one of the two paths. It also means a
field added inside a group later inherits the group's gate instead of defaulting to
visible; there is a test that adds an imaginary future fee field and asserts exactly
that.

Two write-back asymmetries, both load-bearing:

  * ownerName is written ONLY when the frame carries one. house.update also writes
    that column, from a different sweep, and a pre-v5 overlay's house.decay carries
    no ownerName at all — coalescing to null would let every decay transition erase
    a name the registry had already resolved.
  * The schedule and fee columns are written UNCONDITIONALLY, including as nulls. A
    schedule is a claim about the future and goes stale on its own: roll a shard
    back to a pre-v5 overlay, or let a house leave IDOC, and the right stored value
    is nothing. A dismissal date nobody is maintaining is worse than none.

dismissalAt is taken from the shard rather than recomputed. The shard resolved it
against ServUO's two vendor systems, whose charge, funds and pay interval all
differ; re-deriving it here would be a second implementation of PlayerVendor's own
rule.

Visibility — three classifications, each chosen rather than inherited.

  * house.decay's `schedule` defaults to `anonymous`. The countdown IS the public
    IDOC page's content and a house at IDOC is already announced in game. Listed
    anyway so a shard that considers a precise collapse time an unfair advantage can
    raise it — and one nested rule takes the whole schedule with it.
  * vendor.listing's `fees` defaults to `admin`, the only default in the market
    feature that does not reproduce prior behaviour, because there is no prior
    behaviour to reproduce. Shop name, owner and location are already visible to any
    player through the in-game Vendor Search gump, which is the argument for
    publishing them. Held gold, daily charge and dismissal date are visible to the
    OWNER only, on that vendor's own gump. Publishing them anonymously would be a
    new disclosure and a targeting aid — which shops are about to be abandoned, and
    how much coin is in each.
  * account.login.result is admin-only BY OMISSION. KIND_FEATURE is the map of kinds
    an admin may widen, and there is no rung below admin that an IP plus an auth
    verdict belongs on. The omission is the decision, and a test says so by name.

owner_acct needs no rule: rule 1 locks it by suffix. And the new columns are in no
REST read model's column list — they exist for Phase 11's server-side trigger and
reach no client at all.

The pin, and the protocol-4 bug seen from the other side.

Both declaration sites go to 5 (the model constant and schema.sql's CREATE default),
plus the one-shot migration, guarded `protocol < 5` so an install that missed an
earlier step is carried the whole way.

The schema test used to assert `DEFAULT 4` at each site. That is exactly how
protocol 4 shipped with the emitters moved and one site left behind: every site
agreed with itself and the test passed. It now reads DEFAULT_PROTOCOL from the
model, so the assertion is "the declarations AGREE", and the one-shot migration
test is written once against the current version instead of being hand-copied per
bump.

470 tests pass, 16 new. Verified end to end on the live rig against a real ServUO
and the release sidecar.

Docs: RunicGateway/docs link/v5.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

server/model/shardMarket/shardMarket.model.js

@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ const MAX_OWNER = 64
 const MAX_MAP = 40
 const MAX_REGION = 80
 const MAX_SERIAL = 20
+const MAX_ACCT = 120
 
 const clip = (value, max) => {
   if (value == null) return null
@@ -43,6 +44,42 @@ const int = (value, fallback = 0) => {
   return Number.isFinite(n) ? Math.trunc(n) : fallback
 }
 
+// A wire timestamp -> a Date the DB layer can bind, or null. The shard emits ISO-8601
+// (`DateTime.ToString("o")`); anything else is a plugin we do not recognise and is
+// dropped rather than stored as an Invalid Date, which MariaDB rejects in strict mode
+// and which would fail the whole vendor over one bad field.
+const when = (value) => {
+  if (!value) return null
+  const d = new Date(value)
+  return Number.isNaN(d.getTime()) ? null : d
+}
+
+// Protocol 5. The vendor's fee state, normalised out of the frame's `fees` object.
+//
+// Two things this deliberately does NOT do. It does not recompute `dismissalAt` from
+// the parts -- the shard resolved it against ServUO's own two vendor systems (the
+// charge, the funds and the interval all differ between them) and re-deriving it here
+// would be a second implementation of a rule that lives in PlayerVendor.PayTimer. And
+// it does not treat a missing `fees` object as zero: a pre-v5 overlay simply omits it,
+// and nulls are how a v5 website says "this shard has not told me" rather than
+// "this vendor is broke", which is the difference between silence and a false alarm.
+const fees = (f) => {
+  if (!f || typeof f !== 'object') return { feesExempt: false, chargePerPeriod: null, funds: null, payIntervalSec: null, nextPayAt: null, periodsRemaining: null, dismissalAt: null }
+  // A commission vendor has no pay timer and is never dismissed for fees. Reporting it
+  // as exempt with no schedule is not the same as reporting a very long one, and a
+  // surface that renders "never" must be able to tell them apart.
+  if (f.exempt === true) return { feesExempt: true, chargePerPeriod: null, funds: null, payIntervalSec: null, nextPayAt: null, periodsRemaining: null, dismissalAt: null }
+  return {
+    feesExempt: false,
+    chargePerPeriod: Number.isFinite(f.chargePerPeriod) ? Math.trunc(f.chargePerPeriod) : null,
+    funds: Number.isFinite(f.funds) ? Math.trunc(f.funds) : null,
+    payIntervalSec: Number.isFinite(f.payIntervalSec) ? Math.trunc(f.payIntervalSec) : null,
+    nextPayAt: when(f.nextPayAt),
+    periodsRemaining: Number.isFinite(f.periodsRemaining) ? Math.trunc(f.periodsRemaining) : null,
+    dismissalAt: when(f.dismissalAt),
+  }
+}
+
 // ── Ingest ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
 /**
@@ -64,6 +101,10 @@ function flattenFrame(ev) {
     shopName: clip(ev.shopName, MAX_SHOP),
     ownerSerial: clip(ev.ownerSerial, MAX_SERIAL),
     ownerName: clip(ev.ownerName, MAX_OWNER),
+    // Protocol 5. The character name has been here since v3, but only the game
+    // ACCOUNT joins to shard_account_links -- so this is the field that makes a
+    // vendor row resolvable to a person at all.
+    ownerAcct: clip(ev.ownerAcct, MAX_ACCT),
     map: clip(loc.map, MAX_MAP),
     x: Number.isFinite(loc.x) ? Math.trunc(loc.x) : null,
     y: Number.isFinite(loc.y) ? Math.trunc(loc.y) : null,
@@ -76,6 +117,7 @@ function flattenFrame(ev) {
     itemTotal: int(ev.total, int(ev.count, 0)),
     truncated: ev.truncated === true,
     t: Number.isFinite(ev.t) ? ev.t : null,
+    ...fees(ev.fees),
   }
 }