feat(teams): ingest guild rank, and report every leader rather than one
The module half of the Protocol 4 rank amendment (servuo-plugins, same wire
version -- Protocol 4 is unreleased on `edge`, so it is amended rather than
bumped).
`shard_guild_members` gains `rank`, `rank_cliloc` and `rank_name`. The provider
then answers the question it previously could not: `getTeamLeaders()` returns
EVERY member at rank 4, not just the board's single `leader_serial`. That
limitation was the whole reason the wire grew a per-member rank -- TEAMS.md §2.5
treats multiple leaders as the normal case and core has always supported them.
The board's `leader_serial` is folded in as a floor rather than replaced. It
comes from a different frame, so on a shard whose roster has not been re-emitted
since the amendment it is the only leadership signal there is, and moving to
ranks must not lose it.
## NULL rank is a real state, and it is load-bearing
The shard withholds the rank for a staff account, because ServUO's
`PlayerMobile.GuildRank` reports Leader for anyone at GameMaster or above
whatever their actual rank. Every layer here preserves that:
- the ingest stores NULL rather than defaulting to 0, which would be a
demotion this code invented;
- `leader` requires an integer rank >= 4, so absence is never leadership;
- the leaders query compares on `rank`, and NULL is excluded by the comparison.
Reading a missing rank as either 0 or "leader" would republish the exact lie the
shard went out of its way not to send.
## Rank labels
Three sources, in order: a custom rank's literal string, then the operator's
cliloc table, then the five standard names. The last exists because the cliloc
table is populated only if someone ran the client-file extraction, and a roster
on a shard that has not should still read "Warlord" rather than nothing. A
failing lookup falls back rather than failing the roster -- a label is decoration,
and losing it must not lose the data.
`rank` is backticked everywhere it is written, like `int` on shard_online: it is
reserved in MySQL 8 and merely a keyword in MariaDB, so it parses bare here and
must not be relied on to.
The schema fragment carries ALTERs as well as the CREATE. No production install
has this table -- it is new in an unreleased protocol -- but `edge` deployments do,
from the roster work that landed before the amendment, and CREATE TABLE IF NOT
EXISTS adds a table and never a column. Same gap the sidecar's own store hit when
`guilds.members` was added.
## Verification
The unit tests stub the db layer, so the round trip was proved separately: the
VERBATIM roster frame captured from the live ServUO run was fed through the real
ingest into MariaDB and then read back through the provider.
stored: 0x1F5 rank=4 0x1F6 rank=3 0x1F7 rank=2 0x1F8 rank=1
0x1F9 rank=NULL (the GameMaster) 0x2E0 rank=4
provider: leaders = [0x1F5, 0x2E0] <- two, which the board alone cannot express
labels = Leader / Warlord / Emissary / Member, with no cliloc table
0x1F9 = not a leader, no label
9/9 checks. Suite 413 -> 421 tests, all passing.
Refs docs/link/v4.md §2.3, docs/website/TEAMS.md §2.5
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -386,6 +386,14 @@ async function upsertGuildRoster(ev) {
|
||||
acct: m.acct ?? null,
|
||||
web_id: Number.isFinite(m.webId) ? m.webId : null,
|
||||
is_player: m.player ? 1 : 0,
|
||||
// Guild rank (Protocol 4). ABSENT is a real state and is stored as NULL: the
|
||||
// shard withholds the rank for a staff account, because ServUO's GuildRank
|
||||
// getter reports Leader for anyone at GameMaster or above whatever their
|
||||
// actual rank. Defaulting a missing rank to 0 here would turn "we were not
|
||||
// told" into "rank 0", which is a demotion invented by this line.
|
||||
rank: Number.isInteger(m.rank) ? m.rank : null,
|
||||
rank_cliloc: Number.isInteger(m.rankCliloc) ? m.rankCliloc : null,
|
||||
rank_name: typeof m.rankName === 'string' && m.rankName ? m.rankName.slice(0, 64) : null,
|
||||
t: Number.isFinite(ev.t) ? ev.t : null,
|
||||
}))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user