Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
e4af7dd9a8 test(client): check what the chunk registers, and fix two defects in the checks
Three things, all about checks that had never met a real chunk.

`checkExternals.js` rejected slice 3's build outright, naming a fragment of
minified JSX as an imported specifier: a button reading "Approve and import"
puts the token immediately before a quote, and no regexp can tell that from a
statement. Same wall the server's `checkImports.js` hit, answered the same way —
a character walk. A mask rather than a rewrite, because a real import has its
keyword outside a string and its specifier inside one.

Writing the test for that false positive found the false NEGATIVE underneath
it: the pattern required whitespace after `import`, so it could not see
`import{useState}from"react"` — the one shape a minified build actually emits,
and the most likely way for a missed alias to reach production. It has never
been able to see it.

`registration.test.js` is new: stand up a fake `window.__rg` with a recording
registry and the real React, import the BUILT chunk, and read back what it
asked for. No DOM, because nothing renders. It holds the agreement that rots
quietly — every nav row points at a route this module actually registered —
rather than restating both lists.

CI now builds before it tests, because both of those read `dist/entry.js` and
skip without it. Run the other way round they are green and asking nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 18:00:50 -05:00
5d7668d5ea feat(module): the bundle skeleton (phase 3, slice 0)
Some checks failed
PR Checks / server-tests (pull_request) Failing after 10s
PR Checks / client-build (pull_request) Successful in 8m45s
The first real module. It registers nothing, deliberately: what slice 0 proves
is the delivery path itself, end to end, before a single UO file moves into it.

Server half: module.json, an entry point that takes (ctx, api) and registers
nothing, a test suite built on a fake ctx, and scripts/checkImports.js -- the
MODULE_API.md §5.1 boundary check. Client half: the Vite library build, four
shims re-exporting react / react-dom/client / react-router-dom / jsx-runtime
from window.__rg, an entry that verifies each is identity-equal to core's copy,
and scripts/checkExternals.js. 29 server tests, 9 client tests, both new.

Verified against a real core: the module loads, mounts its zero routes, runs to
`started`, and is published by /api/v1/public/modules. Its chunk serves from
the entry's directory with `Cache-Control: no-cache` while the module's server
source, module.json and package.json all 404. In Chrome, under the enforced
`script-src 'self'`, the chunk evaluates and reports all four shared
dependencies OK, with zero CSP reports and no console errors.

Three findings, each of which had produced a green build that was wrong.

MODULE_API.md §3.6 shows `external` alongside the aliases and they do not
compose. Rollup asks `external` BEFORE Vite's alias resolver runs, so a
specifier in both is marked external and never aliased -- the chunk then ships
bare `import "react"`, which no browser can resolve without an import map, and
CSP forbids one. Built cleanly and emitted exactly that; checkExternals caught
it. So: alias only, `external` empty, and vite.config.js grows a resolution-time
guard that fails the build if a shared dependency resolves into node_modules.

That guard was wrong twice before it worked. Written against Rollup's `load`
hook it never ran -- `load` is first-wins and an earlier plugin had already
claimed the module -- so a deliberately-broken alias produced a 24 kB chunk with
react-router welded in, and a green build. And its forbidden-package list was
derived from the alias list "so the two cannot disagree", which meant deleting
an alias also deleted the guard against what that alias prevented. It states the
contract now, and a test asserts the aliases stay inside it.

checkImports failed on its own documentation the first time it ran: the comment
naming require("../../etc/passwd") as an example of what to catch, and index.js
explaining why the module must never require("express"). A boundary check that
cannot survive being described is one people stop writing comments around. It
strips comments and template literals with a character walk rather than a
regexp, because a URL in a string contains a comment opener and a comment
contains quotes -- and it has its own test suite, since a check never shown to
fail is a check nobody knows the state of.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 01:31:37 -05:00
4a0d8f0873 ci(module-uo): gate pull requests into main on server and client checks
All checks were successful
PR Checks / server-tests (pull_request) Successful in 4s
PR Checks / client-build (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Mirrors RunicGateway/website's pr-checks.yml, since this module is two npm
packages shaped like that repo's server/ and client/ and is loaded into that
repo's process: same Node 20, same npm ci + test + build, same concurrency
cancel and the same `PR Checks / *` status pattern for branch protection.

The repo has no module code yet — the API contract is settled in Phase 1 and
Phase 3 is what extracts the UO half of website/ into here — so each half's
gates are conditional on its package.json existing. Before the code lands the
jobs report green with a notice explaining why; the moment a package.json
appears they arm themselves with no edit to this file. That is the same guard
the installer repo used through its own planning phase, and it beats both
alternatives: leaving the repo ungated, or red-Xing every governance PR.

Landing it now also gets the status contexts reported once, which is what makes
them selectable when the `main` branch-protection rule is configured.

Deliberately not here yet, because there is nothing for them to act on until
Phase 3: the release workflow that publishes module-uo-<version>.tar.gz and its
sha256, the zero-internal-imports check, and the module's own frozen route
manifest. Each lands with the code it checks.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 02:40:23 -05:00