bf9a702cfa5821d4d5cfac6602aea6d22659f539
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6a276a7ec3 |
feat(shard): ingest protocol 5 — decay schedule, vendor fees, login result
The website half of the protocol-5 bump. Engagement Phase 10.
Schema — twelve columns and two indexes.
shard_houses gains next_stage, estimated_collapse, decay_period_sec and
dynamic_decay. estimated_collapse is nullable and stays null far more often than
not, deliberately: under dynamic decay ServUO draws each stage at random on entry,
so collapse is knowable only at IDOC. A null means "not knowable", never "not yet
read".
shard_vendors gains owner_acct plus seven fee columns and an index on dismissal_at.
owner_acct is the structural one — the table has carried owner_name since protocol
3, but a character name joins to nothing, and only the game account reaches
shard_account_links. Until now a vendor row named an owner the site could not
resolve to a person. dismissal_at + owner_acct are what let Phase 11's
uo.vendor.expiring find "vendors about to be dismissed" and turn each into a
person, without scanning every shop.
Ingest.
Both new field groups arrive NESTED and are flattened into columns on the way in,
then re-nested on the way out — the same trick shardMarket already uses for
`location`. That is not stylistic: the visibility projection matches literal JSON
keys, so the stored read model and the live wire frame have to spell a group
identically or one admin rule covers only one of the two paths. It also means a
field added inside a group later inherits the group's gate instead of defaulting to
visible; there is a test that adds an imaginary future fee field and asserts exactly
that.
Two write-back asymmetries, both load-bearing:
* ownerName is written ONLY when the frame carries one. house.update also writes
that column, from a different sweep, and a pre-v5 overlay's house.decay carries
no ownerName at all — coalescing to null would let every decay transition erase
a name the registry had already resolved.
* The schedule and fee columns are written UNCONDITIONALLY, including as nulls. A
schedule is a claim about the future and goes stale on its own: roll a shard
back to a pre-v5 overlay, or let a house leave IDOC, and the right stored value
is nothing. A dismissal date nobody is maintaining is worse than none.
dismissalAt is taken from the shard rather than recomputed. The shard resolved it
against ServUO's two vendor systems, whose charge, funds and pay interval all
differ; re-deriving it here would be a second implementation of PlayerVendor's own
rule.
Visibility — three classifications, each chosen rather than inherited.
* house.decay's `schedule` defaults to `anonymous`. The countdown IS the public
IDOC page's content and a house at IDOC is already announced in game. Listed
anyway so a shard that considers a precise collapse time an unfair advantage can
raise it — and one nested rule takes the whole schedule with it.
* vendor.listing's `fees` defaults to `admin`, the only default in the market
feature that does not reproduce prior behaviour, because there is no prior
behaviour to reproduce. Shop name, owner and location are already visible to any
player through the in-game Vendor Search gump, which is the argument for
publishing them. Held gold, daily charge and dismissal date are visible to the
OWNER only, on that vendor's own gump. Publishing them anonymously would be a
new disclosure and a targeting aid — which shops are about to be abandoned, and
how much coin is in each.
* account.login.result is admin-only BY OMISSION. KIND_FEATURE is the map of kinds
an admin may widen, and there is no rung below admin that an IP plus an auth
verdict belongs on. The omission is the decision, and a test says so by name.
owner_acct needs no rule: rule 1 locks it by suffix. And the new columns are in no
REST read model's column list — they exist for Phase 11's server-side trigger and
reach no client at all.
The pin, and the protocol-4 bug seen from the other side.
Both declaration sites go to 5 (the model constant and schema.sql's CREATE default),
plus the one-shot migration, guarded `protocol < 5` so an install that missed an
earlier step is carried the whole way.
The schema test used to assert `DEFAULT 4` at each site. That is exactly how
protocol 4 shipped with the emitters moved and one site left behind: every site
agreed with itself and the test passed. It now reads DEFAULT_PROTOCOL from the
model, so the assertion is "the declarations AGREE", and the one-shot migration
test is written once against the current version instead of being hand-copied per
bump.
470 tests pass, 16 new. Verified end to end on the live rig against a real ServUO
and the release sidecar.
Docs: RunicGateway/docs link/v5.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 6b99d7e220 |
test(server): port core's UO suite onto the ctx harness
22 test files moved from core, plus the two that were split out of files core keeps. 351 tests pass. One change runs through every moved test, and it is the boundary rather than a chore: core internals can no longer be stubbed by requiring them, because there are none to require. `../utils/db` and `../model/settings` do not exist here. What a test controls instead is the ctx core would have handed over, installed once by test/_setup.js -- which is a better seam anyway, since it is exactly the surface the contract promises and nothing wider. The ctx _setup installs is deliberately unfrozen. Core freezes what it hands a module and entry.test.js still asserts against a frozen one; but a test that needs settings.get to return a path has to be able to say so. Two tests changed SHAPE, and that is the boundary too. fromShardEvent used to assert through publish() into pushDevices and a captured fetch -- which endpoints were hit, how many requests went out. None of that is this module's any more: publish is ctx.push.publish, and the device registry and the relay are behind it. Reaching for them from here would be reaching past ctx. What remains is what the module owns and is the part worth guarding: a game account resolves to a website user, a personal target that resolves to nobody is dropped rather than published, and a sensitive kind never reaches publish at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
