The module's half of the org lead's correction: Teams is the contract, guilds
are the presentation, and the presentation is this module's.
Adds `/uo/guilds/:id` — the detail view the board never had — with the roster
from this module's OWN board, which is the same data it answers core's Team
provider from. Reading core's projection of our own answer back would be a round
trip through a staler copy of it.
The page declares `uo.guild.detail` and core fills it with the Team activity
feed. That is the one part of this page core cannot hand over: only core can
resolve whether the viewer is inside the Team, and the public/members split on
that feed is a security boundary. The guild is named in OUR terms — core maps
its own Team from the module id and the external id — so this module never holds
core's row id or slug.
`TeamOverviewStrip` is deleted with the core Team page it filled.
`team.member.row` is not declared here either: the useful thing to put in a
roster row is a link to the character behind it, and nothing core could supply
identifies one.
`GET /public/shard/guilds/:id` backs the page, gated and projected through the
same `guilds` feature as the board — so an operator who raises that audience
raises this too, and the locked acct/webId fields never survive below admin. A
roster is where those appear in bulk, which makes this the endpoint where
getting the projection wrong would matter most.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The module's half of TEAMS.md phase 3.
`projectRoster` is the optional fourth provider method and the only one core
calls on a request path. Core holds the roster and owns its public shape; the
question that is this module's is who is allowed to look, because the audience
rungs and their configuration live here.
The answer is all-or-nothing, which is the honest translation rather than a
shortcut: a rung is a property of the FEATURE, and there is no configuration in
which some members of a guild are public and others are not.
The refusal semantics INVERT here, and the tests say so. For the other three
methods a refusal means "change nothing" and an empty array would be
destructive. Core fails CLOSED on this one, so the dangerous answer is the
opposite — returning every key because the config could not be read would
publish a roster an operator gated to staff. Every path that cannot reach a
confident answer refuses, including the catch.
The anonymous case is answered directly rather than by handing `viewerLevel` a
synthetic request. Given one with no `req.user` it falls through to
`auth.getUserFromRequest`, which expects real cookies and throws on a fake — and
that throw would have become a refusal, so every anonymous visitor would have
been served an empty roster on a shard whose guilds are public. Caught by the
tests, not by reading.
`team.overview` gets a live population reading beside core's stored one. Core's
number comes from the last roster sync and is coarse by construction; this is
the `presence.online` feed this module already holds. It is explicitly not a
per-Team presence figure — the shard publishes a global aggregate and no
per-guild breakdown exists on the wire, so claiming one would be inventing a
number — and it renders nothing at all when it has nothing true to say.
`team.member.row` is left unfilled. The useful thing to put there is a link to
the character behind a row, and the props core can supply do not identify one:
the member key and the site account id are withheld from every public roster.
An empty cell beats a guess.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The §7.7 smoke, running the pair together: registering the player row without an
`icon` blanked the whole portal with React error #130, because core's
PlayerPortalLayout rendered `<n.icon />` unguarded. Core is guarded now
(website), and this is the other half — the row had an icon before it moved and
should have kept one.
A second glyph rather than reusing IconShard: these two rows sit in different
navs and each matched its neighbours before the extraction. The admin sidebar's
UO rows were gems; the portal's Characters row was a person beside Appeals'
shield and Account's gear. Matching the nav a row lands in is the whole reason
`icon` is in the contract.
`registration.test.js` now asserts it for admin AND player rows, which is the
cheap place to catch the next one. The public header is text buttons and is
deliberately excluded.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three things, all about checks that had never met a real chunk.
`checkExternals.js` rejected slice 3's build outright, naming a fragment of
minified JSX as an imported specifier: a button reading "Approve and import"
puts the token immediately before a quote, and no regexp can tell that from a
statement. Same wall the server's `checkImports.js` hit, answered the same way —
a character walk. A mask rather than a rewrite, because a real import has its
keyword outside a string and its specifier inside one.
Writing the test for that false positive found the false NEGATIVE underneath
it: the pattern required whitespace after `import`, so it could not see
`import{useState}from"react"` — the one shape a minified build actually emits,
and the most likely way for a missed alias to reach production. It has never
been able to see it.
`registration.test.js` is new: stand up a fake `window.__rg` with a recording
registry and the real React, import the BUILT chunk, and read back what it
asked for. No DOM, because nothing renders. It holds the agreement that rots
quietly — every nav row points at a route this module actually registered —
rather than restating both lists.
CI now builds before it tests, because both of those read `dist/entry.js` and
skip without it. Run the other way round they are green and asking nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
