ci/core-ref.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
-  "$comment": "The core this module is proved against. MODULE_API.md §5.3: the frozen-manifest job clones RunicGateway/website at this exact ref, drops this module in as modules/uo and runs CORE's own routeManifest.js — nothing else can answer whether the URLs the module claims are the URLs it actually serves. Pinned rather than tracking a branch on purpose: core moves for reasons that have nothing to do with this module, and a bump is then a deliberate commit saying which core the module was last proved against, instead of an unexplained red X on someone else's PR. Bump it, regenerate routes.manifest.json, and commit both together. **It pointed at `edge` for the length of the Event System window** (org lead, 2026-09-04), and this commit ends that: `api.registerEventActions` exists only from MODULE_API 1.10.0, so under the previous `main` pin `register()` threw and the module did not load at all — the job would have been red by construction for eight phases and would have proved nothing while a real regression hid behind it. The Phase 16b cutover put 1.10.0 on `main`, so the pin comes home, and this is the same move that turns the Integration kit green again. **routes.manifest.json needed NO regeneration**: the job's own steps were run against this exact ref and answered `routes.manifest.json is current — 73 routes, all documented`, so the \"commit both together\" instruction above had nothing to pair with this time.",
+  "$comment": "The core this module is proved against. MODULE_API.md §5.3: the frozen-manifest job clones RunicGateway/website at this exact ref, drops this module in as modules/uo and runs CORE's own routeManifest.js — nothing else can answer whether the URLs the module claims are the URLs it actually serves. Pinned rather than tracking a branch on purpose: core moves for reasons that have nothing to do with this module, and a bump is then a deliberate commit saying which core the module was last proved against, instead of an unexplained red X on someone else's PR. Bump it, regenerate routes.manifest.json, and commit both together. **It pointed at `edge` for the length of the Event System window** (org lead, 2026-09-04), and this commit ends that: `api.registerEventActions` exists only from MODULE_API 1.10.0, so under the previous `main` pin `register()` threw and the module did not load at all — the job would have been red by construction for eight phases and would have proved nothing while a real regression hid behind it. The Phase 16b cutover put 1.10.0 on `main`, so the pin comes home, and this is the same move that turns the Integration kit green again. **routes.manifest.json needed NO regeneration**: the job's own steps were run against this exact ref and answered `routes.manifest.json is current — 73 routes, all documented`, so the \"commit both together\" instruction above had nothing to pair with this time. **2026-10-30, account deletion (ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4):** this module registers onUserDeleting (MODULE_API 1.20.0), so coreApi is ^1.20.0 and the pin moves past 1.11.0-1.19.0 to `main` at the sha website#232 merged as. A 1.19.0 core has no api.onUserDeleting, so register() would throw under the old pin.",
   "repo": "https://gitea.whitlocktech.com/RunicGateway/website.git",
-  "ref": "655fbf3f69a6a1fd650ecbc81afd6cf9c2ad9f66",
+  "ref": "7bd93b8bb0da734a642587f256d10c523ca39bea",
-  "refName": "main @ MODULE_API 1.10.0, the Event System cutover (website#199)"
+  "refName": "main @ MODULE_API 1.20.0, account deletion (website#232)"
 }

client/src/routes/admin/ShardAdmin.jsx

@@ -83,6 +83,39 @@ function StatusPanel({ config }) {
   )
 }
 
+// ── Unlinks a deleted website account left behind ───────────────────────────
+//
+// ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4. Deleting a website account unlinks its game accounts
+// on the shard first; what the shard could not take is listed here until it
+// clears. `pending` is retried by itself when the bridge reconnects. `refused` is
+// a protected staff account the shard will not unlink over the bridge, so the
+// shard's staff clear its WebsiteUserId tag by hand. A row goes on its own once a
+// login on that account no longer carries the deleted user's id.
+function PendingUnlinks({ rows }) {
+  if (!rows || rows.length === 0) return null
+  return (
+    <section style={{ border: '1px solid var(--line)', borderRadius: 10, padding: 16, display: 'flex', flexDirection: 'column', gap: 10 }}>
+      <h3 className="display" style={{ margin: 0, fontSize: '1.05rem', color: 'var(--head)' }}>Still linked on the shard</h3>
+      <p className="sans dim" style={{ margin: 0, fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>
+        Game accounts whose website account was deleted, but whose link the shard has not cleared yet.
+      </p>
+      <ul style={{ margin: 0, padding: 0, listStyle: 'none', display: 'flex', flexDirection: 'column', gap: 8 }}>
+        {rows.map((r) => (
+          <li key={r.account} className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.85rem', color: 'var(--ink)' }}>
+            <strong>{r.account}</strong>
+            <span className="dim"> · deleted user #{r.webUserId} · {new Date(r.queuedAt).toLocaleString()}</span>
+            <div className="dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.78rem', marginTop: 2 }}>
+              {r.state === 'refused'
+                ? 'Protected staff account: the shard will not unlink it over the bridge. Clear its link on the shard by hand.'
+                : `Waiting for the shard; tried ${r.attempts} time${r.attempts === 1 ? '' : 's'}, and tried again when the bridge reconnects.`}
+            </div>
+          </li>
+        ))}
+      </ul>
+    </section>
+  )
+}
+
 // ── Game-account signup ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 //
 // This field lived in core's Site Settings until slice 3 of the extraction. It
@@ -285,6 +318,8 @@ export default function ShardAdmin() {
 
       <StatusPanel config={config} />
 
+      <PendingUnlinks rows={config.pendingUnlinks} />
+
       <Toggle checked={enabled} onChange={setEnabled} label="Enable the shard integration" />
 
       <label style={{ display: 'block' }}>

module.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "id": "uo",
   "name": "Ultima Online",
   "version": "0.6.0",
-  "coreApi": "^1.10.0",
+  "coreApi": "^1.20.0",
   "server": "server/index.js",
   "client": { "entry": "client/dist/entry.js" },
   "schema": "server/db/schema.sql",

server/db/purge.sql

@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@
 -- marker, and deleting it would re-arm a protocol bump against tables this
 -- file has just dropped.
 
+-- Account deletion's queue (MODULE_API 1.20.0), the newest table. No foreign key:
+-- its rows outlive the users they name, by design.
+DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `shard_pending_unlinks`;
+
 -- The Asset Bridge's three (phase 3). No foreign keys of their own, so they lead:
 -- `shard_creature_bodies.slug` mirrors an atlas slug and `shard_assets.body` a body
 -- id, but neither is declared as a constraint — the atlas tables are rebuilt from

server/db/schema.sql

@@ -974,3 +974,27 @@ INSERT IGNORE INTO settings (`key`, value) VALUES ('uo_link_protocol_8_migrated'
 -- applied to an empty database. That is the same blind spot the protocol-pin block
 -- above records, two phases running.
 ALTER TABLE shard_spawn_points ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS unique_id VARCHAR(64) NULL;
+
+-- Game-account unlinks a website account's deletion could not finish
+-- (MODULE_API 1.20.0; ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4, AD11). `utils/accountDeletion.js`
+-- queues every linked account BEFORE it asks the shard, and drops the row when the
+-- shard answers 200 or 404.
+--   pending  the shard was away (503, no sidecar, a timeout): retried when the
+--            bridge reconnects and on a live server.hello
+--   refused  a protected staff account (403): never retried; Admin → Shard lists
+--            it as still linked on the shard, for the shard's staff to clear
+-- Either goes once a live mob.login on the account carries no webId, or another.
+--
+-- **No foreign key, deliberately.** `web_user_id` names a user who is gone by the
+-- time the row matters; it is the id the shard still reports, kept so a login can
+-- show the tag has gone.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS shard_pending_unlinks (
+  account          VARCHAR(120) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
+  web_user_id      INT          NOT NULL,
+  state            VARCHAR(16)  NOT NULL DEFAULT 'pending',
+  queued_at        DATETIME     NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  attempts         INT          NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
+  last_attempt_at  DATETIME     NULL,
+  last_error       VARCHAR(255) NULL,
+  INDEX idx_shard_pending_unlinks_state (state)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;

server/index.js

@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ const engagementSeeds = require('./config/engagementSeeds')
   const teamProvider = require('./model/teamProvider/teamProvider.model')
   const guildCommand = require('./commands/guild.command')
   const boot = require('./boot')
+  const accountDeletion = require('./utils/accountDeletion')
   /* eslint-enable global-require */
 
   const log = core.logger()
@@ -184,6 +185,13 @@ const engagementSeeds = require('./config/engagementSeeds')
   api.onBoot(boot.onBoot)
   api.onShutdown(boot.onShutdown)
 
+  // Account deletion (MODULE_API 1.20.0; ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4, AD10, AD11).
+  // Core asks before the users row goes: each linked game account is unlinked on
+  // the shard through the staff unlink's path, so the shard stops reporting the
+  // deleted user's id. It cannot stop the deletion; what the shard could not take
+  // now waits in `shard_pending_unlinks` and is retried when the bridge is back.
+  api.onUserDeleting(accountDeletion.onUserDeleting)
+
   log.info('registered', {
     version: require('../module.json').version,
     routes: 'public:/shard,/atlas admin:/shard,/uo-link player:/shard',

server/model/shardPendingUnlinks/shardPendingUnlinks.db.js

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+// Game-account unlinks that a website account's deletion could not finish
+// (ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4, AD11). See utils/accountDeletion.js for who writes
+// and who clears these rows.
+
+const { query } = require('../../core')
+
+const COLS = 'account, web_user_id, state, queued_at, attempts, last_attempt_at, last_error'
+
+// Queue an account before the first call to the shard, so a hook core abandons
+// at its time limit still leaves the account here. A re-queue (the same account
+// deleted twice is impossible, but a test or a retry is not) starts it over.
+const queue = ({ account, webUserId }) =>
+  query(
+    `INSERT INTO shard_pending_unlinks (account, web_user_id, state)
+     VALUES (?, ?, 'pending')
+     ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE web_user_id = VALUES(web_user_id), state = 'pending',
+       attempts = 0, last_attempt_at = NULL, last_error = NULL`,
+    [account, webUserId],
+  )
+
+const remove = (account) => query('DELETE FROM shard_pending_unlinks WHERE account = ?', [account])
+
+// One attempt that did not finish. `state` is `pending` (try again) or `refused`
+// (the shard said no for good: a protected staff account).
+const recordAttempt = ({ account, state, error }) =>
+  query(
+    `UPDATE shard_pending_unlinks
+        SET state = ?, attempts = attempts + 1, last_attempt_at = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, last_error = ?
+      WHERE account = ?`,
+    [state, error ? String(error).slice(0, 255) : null, account],
+  )
+
+const listPending = () =>
+  query(`SELECT ${COLS} FROM shard_pending_unlinks WHERE state = 'pending' ORDER BY queued_at ASC`)
+
+const listAll = () => query(`SELECT ${COLS} FROM shard_pending_unlinks ORDER BY queued_at ASC`)
+
+// The shard just reported this account logging in with `webId` (or none). When
+// that is no longer the deleted user, the tag is gone and the row has nothing
+// left to wait for. Returns the number of rows dropped.
+async function clearIfNotAttributed(account, webId) {
+  const result = await query(
+    `DELETE FROM shard_pending_unlinks
+      WHERE account = ? AND (? IS NULL OR web_user_id <> ?)`,
+    [account, webId, webId],
+  )
+  return Number(result && result.affectedRows) || 0
+}
+
+module.exports = { queue, remove, recordAttempt, listPending, listAll, clearIfNotAttributed }

server/router/admin/uoLink.controller.js

@@ -11,11 +11,15 @@ const uoLinkClient = require('../../utils/uoLinkClient')
 const uoLinkSocket = require('../../utils/uoLinkSocket')
 const shardBroadcast = require('../../utils/shardBroadcast')
 const gameSignup = require('../../utils/gameSignup')
+const accountDeletion = require('../../utils/accountDeletion')
 const { activity } = require('../../core')
 
 const log = require('../../core').logger('admin-uolink')
 
-// Assemble the masked config + live health + ingestion stats for the panel.
+// Assemble the masked config + live health + ingestion stats for the panel, and
+// the game accounts a website account's deletion left linked on the shard
+// (ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4): `pending` waits for the shard, `refused` is a
+// protected staff account the shard's staff must clear by hand.
 async function buildStatus() {
   const config = await uoLinkConfig.getSafe()
   const health = await uoLinkClient.health()
@@ -24,6 +28,7 @@ async function buildStatus() {
     health: health.ok ? health.data : { ok: false, error: health.error || `status ${health.status}` },
     ingest: uoLinkSocket.getState(),
     sse: shardBroadcast.stats(),
+    pendingUnlinks: await accountDeletion.listForAdmin(),
   }
 }
 

server/router/admin/uoLink.router.js

@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ uoLinkRouter.get(
   // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Shard']
   // #swagger.summary = 'Get uo-link config + live status + ingestion stats (admin only)'
   // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
-  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Masked config, health and ingestion stats', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: "object", additionalProperties: true } } } } */
+  // #swagger.description = 'pendingUnlinks lists the game accounts a website account deletion left linked on the shard: state pending (the shard was away; retried when the bridge reconnects) or refused (a protected staff account; shard staff clear it by hand). A row goes once the shard reports a login on the account without the deleted user id.'
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Masked config, health, ingestion stats and pendingUnlinks', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: "object", additionalProperties: true } } } } */
   /* #swagger.responses[403] = { description: 'Admin role required', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
   adminOnly,
   uoLink.getConfig,

server/test/_fakes.js

@@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ function fakeApi() {
     registerEventLeases(leases) { once('registerEventLeases'); record.eventLeases = leases },
     onBoot(fn) { once('onBoot'); record.hooks.onBoot = fn },
     onShutdown(fn) { once('onShutdown'); record.hooks.onShutdown = fn },
+    // MODULE_API 1.20.0 (account deletion, ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4).
+    onUserDeleting(fn) { once('onUserDeleting'); record.hooks.onUserDeleting = fn },
   }
   api.record = record
   return api

server/test/accountDeletion.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,312 @@
+// ── A website account is being deleted (MODULE_API 1.20.0) ──────────────────
+//
+// ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4, AD10 and AD11. What these hold:
+//
+//   • the shard is asked to unlink every game account, through the same sidecar
+//     call the staff unlink makes, and the mirror goes only when it said yes;
+//   • every account is queued BEFORE the first call, so a hook core abandons at
+//     its ten-second limit still leaves the rest in the queue;
+//   • a shard that is away leaves the row pending; a protected account (403)
+//     leaves it refused and is never asked again;
+//   • a live login without the deleted user's id clears the row, and a replayed
+//     one never does.
+
+const { test, afterEach } = require('node:test')
+const assert = require('node:assert/strict')
+
+const { ctx } = require('./_setup')
+const accountDeletion = require('../utils/accountDeletion')
+const shardIngest = require('../utils/shardIngest')
+const shardLinks = require('../model/shardLinks/shardLinks.model')
+const pendingDb = require('../model/shardPendingUnlinks/shardPendingUnlinks.db')
+const uoLinkClient = require('../utils/uoLinkClient')
+
+const originals = {
+  listForUser: shardLinks.listForUser,
+  removeByAccount: shardLinks.removeByAccount,
+  unlinkAccount: uoLinkClient.unlinkAccount,
+  pending: { ...pendingDb },
+  activityLog: ctx.activity.log,
+}
+
+afterEach(() => {
+  shardLinks.listForUser = originals.listForUser
+  shardLinks.removeByAccount = originals.removeByAccount
+  uoLinkClient.unlinkAccount = originals.unlinkAccount
+  Object.assign(pendingDb, originals.pending)
+  ctx.activity.log = originals.activityLog
+  accountDeletion._reset()
+})
+
+/** An in-memory `shard_pending_unlinks`, and a journal of everything asked of it. */
+function fakeQueue(rows = []) {
+  const table = new Map(rows.map((r) => [r.account, { attempts: 0, state: 'pending', ...r }]))
+  const journal = []
+  pendingDb.queue = async ({ account, webUserId }) => {
+    journal.push(['queue', account])
+    table.set(account, { account, web_user_id: webUserId, state: 'pending', attempts: 0 })
+  }
+  pendingDb.remove = async (account) => {
+    journal.push(['remove', account])
+    table.delete(account)
+  }
+  pendingDb.recordAttempt = async ({ account, state, error }) => {
+    journal.push(['attempt', account, state])
+    const row = table.get(account)
+    if (row) Object.assign(row, { state, attempts: row.attempts + 1, last_error: error })
+  }
+  pendingDb.listPending = async () => [...table.values()].filter((r) => r.state === 'pending')
+  pendingDb.listAll = async () => [...table.values()]
+  pendingDb.clearIfNotAttributed = async (account, webId) => {
+    const row = table.get(account)
+    if (!row || (webId !== null && row.web_user_id === webId)) return 0
+    table.delete(account)
+    return 1
+  }
+  return { table, journal }
+}
+
+/** The sidecar, answering per account from a script. */
+function fakeShard(replies) {
+  const asked = []
+  uoLinkClient.unlinkAccount = async ({ actor, account }) => {
+    asked.push({ actor, account })
+    return replies[account]
+  }
+  return asked
+}
+
+function trackMirror() {
+  const removed = []
+  shardLinks.removeByAccount = async (account) => { removed.push(account) }
+  return removed
+}
+
+function trackActivity() {
+  const entries = []
+  ctx.activity.log = async (entry) => { entries.push(entry) }
+  return entries
+}
+
+const OK = { ok: true, status: 200, data: { ok: true } }
+const ABSENT = { ok: false, status: 404 }
+const PROTECTED = { ok: false, status: 403, error: 'protected' }
+const AWAY = { ok: false, status: 503, error: 'plugin not connected' }
+
+test('every game account is unlinked on the shard, then dropped from the mirror and logged', async () => {
+  shardLinks.listForUser = async () => [{ account: 'thorne' }, { account: 'thorne2' }]
+  const { table } = fakeQueue()
+  const asked = fakeShard({ thorne: OK, thorne2: OK })
+  const mirror = trackMirror()
+  const entries = trackActivity()
+
+  await accountDeletion.onUserDeleting({ userId: 7, deletedBy: 'self' })
+
+  // The staff unlink's sidecar call, with an actor that says why.
+  assert.deepEqual(asked, [
+    { actor: 'web:account-deletion', account: 'thorne' },
+    { actor: 'web:account-deletion', account: 'thorne2' },
+  ])
+  assert.deepEqual(mirror, ['thorne', 'thorne2'])
+  assert.equal(table.size, 0, 'nothing left queued')
+
+  // No `userId` column: on a retry the user is already gone.
+  assert.deepEqual(entries, [
+    { action: 'shard.account.unlink', detail: { account: 'thorne', webUserId: 7, reason: 'account deleted', deletedBy: 'self' } },
+    { action: 'shard.account.unlink', detail: { account: 'thorne2', webUserId: 7, reason: 'account deleted', deletedBy: 'self' } },
+  ])
+})
+
+test('every account is queued before the shard is asked anything', async () => {
+  // A hook core abandons at ten seconds keeps running, but core deletes the user
+  // meanwhile; one sidecar call can take twelve. Queued first, nothing is lost.
+  shardLinks.listForUser = async () => [{ account: 'a' }, { account: 'b' }]
+  const { journal } = fakeQueue()
+  fakeShard({ a: OK, b: OK })
+  trackMirror()
+  trackActivity()
+
+  await accountDeletion.onUserDeleting({ userId: 7, deletedBy: 'staff' })
+
+  assert.deepEqual(journal.slice(0, 2), [['queue', 'a'], ['queue', 'b']])
+})
+
+test('a shard that is away leaves the account pending, and the mirror to the cascade', async () => {
+  shardLinks.listForUser = async () => [{ account: 'thorne' }]
+  const { table } = fakeQueue()
+  fakeShard({ thorne: AWAY })
+  const mirror = trackMirror()
+  const entries = trackActivity()
+
+  await accountDeletion.onUserDeleting({ userId: 7, deletedBy: 'self' })
+
+  assert.equal(table.get('thorne').state, 'pending')
+  assert.equal(table.get('thorne').web_user_id, 7)
+  assert.equal(table.get('thorne').last_error, 'plugin not connected')
+  assert.deepEqual(mirror, [])
+  assert.deepEqual(entries, [])
+})
+
+test('a protected staff account is refused, and a retry never asks again', async () => {
+  shardLinks.listForUser = async () => [{ account: 'gm' }]
+  const { table } = fakeQueue()
+  const asked = fakeShard({ gm: PROTECTED })
+  trackMirror()
+  trackActivity()
+
+  await accountDeletion.onUserDeleting({ userId: 7, deletedBy: 'self' })
+  assert.equal(table.get('gm').state, 'refused')
+
+  await accountDeletion.retryPending()
+  assert.equal(asked.length, 1, 'the retry skipped the refused row')
+
+  // Admin → Shard sees it.
+  const listed = await accountDeletion.listForAdmin()
+  assert.equal(listed.length, 1)
+  assert.equal(listed[0].account, 'gm')
+  assert.equal(listed[0].state, 'refused')
+})
+
+test('a 404 means the shard has nothing to clear: the row and the mirror go, with no unlink entry', async () => {
+  shardLinks.listForUser = async () => [{ account: 'thorne' }]
+  const { table } = fakeQueue()
+  fakeShard({ thorne: ABSENT })
+  const mirror = trackMirror()
+  const entries = trackActivity()
+
+  await accountDeletion.onUserDeleting({ userId: 7, deletedBy: 'self' })
+
+  assert.equal(table.size, 0)
+  assert.deepEqual(mirror, ['thorne'])
+  assert.deepEqual(entries, [])
+})
+
+test('an account with no game links asks the shard nothing', async () => {
+  shardLinks.listForUser = async () => []
+  const { journal } = fakeQueue()
+  const asked = fakeShard({})
+
+  await accountDeletion.onUserDeleting({ userId: 7, deletedBy: 'self' })
+
+  assert.deepEqual(journal, [])
+  assert.deepEqual(asked, [])
+})
+
+test('a call that throws leaves the account queued and the hook still resolves', async () => {
+  shardLinks.listForUser = async () => [{ account: 'a' }, { account: 'b' }]
+  const { table } = fakeQueue()
+  uoLinkClient.unlinkAccount = async ({ account }) => {
+    if (account === 'a') throw new Error('socket hang up')
+    return OK
+  }
+  trackMirror()
+  trackActivity()
+
+  await accountDeletion.onUserDeleting({ userId: 7, deletedBy: 'self' })
+
+  assert.deepEqual([...table.keys()], ['a'])
+})
+
+test('a retry finishes what the shard can take and keeps the rest', async () => {
+  const { table } = fakeQueue([
+    { account: 'a', web_user_id: 7 },
+    { account: 'b', web_user_id: 7 },
+  ])
+  // One account failing does not hold up the other.
+  const asked = fakeShard({ a: AWAY, b: OK })
+  trackMirror()
+  trackActivity()
+
+  await accountDeletion.retryPending()
+
+  assert.deepEqual(asked.map((x) => x.account), ['a', 'b'])
+  assert.deepEqual([...table.keys()], ['a'])
+  assert.equal(table.get('a').attempts, 1)
+})
+
+test('two triggers at once share one retry pass', async () => {
+  fakeQueue([{ account: 'a', web_user_id: 7 }])
+  let calls = 0
+  uoLinkClient.unlinkAccount = async () => {
+    calls += 1
+    await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 10))
+    return OK
+  }
+  trackMirror()
+  trackActivity()
+
+  await Promise.all([accountDeletion.retryPending(), accountDeletion.retryPending()])
+  assert.equal(calls, 1)
+})
+
+test('a retry that cannot read the queue resolves anyway', async () => {
+  fakeQueue()
+  pendingDb.listPending = async () => { throw new Error('pool closed') }
+  await accountDeletion.retryPending()
+})
+
+// ── Through the ingest dispatcher ──────────────────────────────────────────
+
+function ingestDeps(pendingUnlinks) {
+  const noop = async () => {}
+  return {
+    shardEvents: { append: noop },
+    shardState: { upsertOnline: noop, clearOnline: noop, setOffline: noop },
+    shardLinks: {},
+    shardMarket: {},
+    uoLinkConfig: { recordStatus: noop },
+    settings: { getInstanceName: async () => 'Rig' },
+    broadcast: () => {},
+    pushDispatch: () => {},
+    engagement: () => {},
+    eventsReconcile: () => {},
+    log: { info: () => {}, warn: () => {}, error: () => {}, debug: () => {} },
+    pendingUnlinks,
+  }
+}
+
+function spyUnlinks() {
+  const calls = { retry: 0, seen: [] }
+  return {
+    calls,
+    retryPending: () => { calls.retry += 1; return Promise.resolve() },
+    seenLogin: async (arg) => { calls.seen.push(arg) },
+  }
+}
+
+test('a live server.hello retries the queue; a replayed one does not', async () => {
+  const spy = spyUnlinks()
+  await shardIngest.ingest({ kind: 'server.hello', bootId: 'b1', t: 1 }, ingestDeps(spy))
+  assert.equal(spy.calls.retry, 1)
+
+  await shardIngest.ingest({ kind: 'server.hello', bootId: 'b1', t: 2 }, { ...ingestDeps(spy), fromBackfill: true })
+  assert.equal(spy.calls.retry, 1)
+})
+
+test('a live login is checked against the queue; a replayed one never is', async () => {
+  const spy = spyUnlinks()
+  const login = { kind: 'mob.login', who: { serial: 1, name: 'Thorne', acct: 'thorne' }, t: 1 }
+
+  await shardIngest.ingest(login, ingestDeps(spy))
+  assert.deepEqual(spy.calls.seen, [{ account: 'thorne', webId: undefined }])
+
+  await shardIngest.ingest({ ...login, webId: 7 }, { ...ingestDeps(spy), fromBackfill: true })
+  assert.equal(spy.calls.seen.length, 1)
+})
+
+test('a login without the deleted user’s id clears the row; one still carrying it does not', async () => {
+  const { table } = fakeQueue([
+    { account: 'thorne', web_user_id: 7, state: 'refused' },
+    { account: 'gm', web_user_id: 9, state: 'refused' },
+  ])
+
+  await accountDeletion.seenLogin({ account: 'gm', webId: 9 })
+  await accountDeletion.seenLogin({ account: 'gm', webId: '9' })
+  assert.ok(table.has('gm'), 'still tagged with the deleted user')
+
+  await accountDeletion.seenLogin({ account: 'thorne', webId: undefined })
+  assert.ok(!table.has('thorne'), 'the tag is gone, whoever cleared it')
+
+  await accountDeletion.seenLogin({ account: 'gm', webId: 12 })
+  assert.ok(!table.has('gm'), 'relinked to someone else')
+})

server/test/entry.test.js

@@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ test('registers exactly what module.json declares', () => {
   assert.ok(api.record.streams.length > 0)
   assert.strictEqual(typeof api.record.hooks.onBoot, 'function')
   assert.strictEqual(typeof api.record.hooks.onShutdown, 'function')
+  // MODULE_API 1.20.0: a deleted account's game links are unlinked on the shard.
+  assert.strictEqual(api.record.hooks.onUserDeleting, require('../utils/accountDeletion').onUserDeleting)
 })
 
 test('every registered stream is namespaced or grandfathered', () => {

server/utils/accountDeletion.js

@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+// ── A website account is being deleted (MODULE_API 1.20.0) ──────────────────
+//
+// ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4. Core asks before the users row goes (AD10), and the
+// row's cascade would drop `shard_account_links` anyway — but that table is only
+// a mirror. The shard keeps the site user id on the game account and reports it
+// as `webId` on every `mob.login`, so a cascade alone would leave the shard
+// attributing the account to a user who no longer exists. The unlink here is the
+// staff unlink's path (usersShard.controller.js): the sidecar's
+// `DELETE /link/{account}` first, the mirror after. The shard account and its
+// characters stay (AD8).
+//
+// **An unlink that cannot finish never holds up the deletion** (AD11):
+//
+//   • every account is queued in `shard_pending_unlinks` BEFORE the first call,
+//     so a hook core abandons at its ten-second limit still leaves the rest
+//     queued (one sidecar call may take twelve);
+//   • a shard that is away (503, no sidecar, a timeout) leaves the row
+//     `pending`, retried whenever the bridge comes back — the WS reconnecting,
+//     which is also how a boot gets here, and a live `server.hello`;
+//   • a protected staff account, which the shard refuses by design (403), is
+//     `refused`: retrying will not help, so Admin → Shard lists it as still
+//     linked on the shard for the shard's staff to clear by hand.
+//
+// Either kind of row goes once the shard reports a live login on that account
+// with no `webId`, or a different one: the tag is gone, whoever cleared it.
+
+const core = require('../core')
+const shardLinks = require('../model/shardLinks/shardLinks.model')
+const pendingDb = require('../model/shardPendingUnlinks/shardPendingUnlinks.db')
+const uoLinkClient = require('./uoLinkClient')
+
+const log = core.logger('account-deletion')
+
+// What the shard's audit records as the one who asked.
+const ACTOR = 'web:account-deletion'
+
+/**
+ * Ask the shard to unlink one queued account, and record what it said.
+ *
+ * 200 and 404 both finish it: 404 means the shard has nothing to clear. Never
+ * throws for a shard answer; a database error does throw, to the caller's catch.
+ *
+ * @returns {Promise<'unlinked'|'absent'|'refused'|'pending'>}
+ */
+async function attempt({ account, webUserId, reason }) {
+  const result = await uoLinkClient.unlinkAccount({ actor: ACTOR, account })
+  if (result.ok || result.status === 404) {
+    await shardLinks.removeByAccount(account)
+    await pendingDb.remove(account)
+    if (!result.ok) return 'absent'
+    // No `userId` on the entry: on a retry the account is already gone, and the
+    // activity log's user_id is a key into `users`. The id is in the detail.
+    await core.activity.log({
+      action: 'shard.account.unlink',
+      detail: { account, webUserId, reason: 'account deleted', ...(reason ? { deletedBy: reason } : {}) },
+    })
+    return 'unlinked'
+  }
+  const error = result.error || `status ${result.status}`
+  if (result.status === 403) {
+    await pendingDb.recordAttempt({ account, state: 'refused', error })
+    log.warn('the shard refused to unlink a deleted account’s game account (protected); listed for shard staff', { account, webUserId })
+    return 'refused'
+  }
+  await pendingDb.recordAttempt({ account, state: 'pending', error })
+  return 'pending'
+}
+
+/**
+ * Core's `api.onUserDeleting`. Unlinks every game account this website account
+ * holds, through the staff unlink's path. Cannot stop the deletion; whatever it
+ * does not finish stays queued.
+ */
+async function onUserDeleting({ userId, deletedBy }) {
+  const links = await shardLinks.listForUser(userId)
+  if (!links.length) return
+
+  for (const { account } of links) {
+    // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+    await pendingDb.queue({ account, webUserId: userId })
+  }
+
+  const outcomes = []
+  for (const { account } of links) {
+    try {
+      // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+      outcomes.push({ account, outcome: await attempt({ account, webUserId: userId, reason: deletedBy }) })
+    } catch (err) {
+      log.warn('an unlink before an account deletion failed; it stays queued', { account, error: err.message })
+      outcomes.push({ account, outcome: 'pending' })
+    }
+  }
+  log.info('game accounts unlinked before an account was deleted', { userId, deletedBy, outcomes })
+}
+
+let inFlight = null
+
+/**
+ * Try every `pending` row once more. One pass at a time: a reconnect and a
+ * `server.hello` arriving together share the pass already running. Every row is
+ * tried, so one account the shard keeps failing on does not hold up the rest.
+ * Never rejects, so a caller may leave it un-awaited.
+ */
+function retryPending() {
+  if (inFlight) return inFlight
+  inFlight = (async () => {
+    try {
+      const rows = await pendingDb.listPending()
+      for (const row of rows) {
+        // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+        const outcome = await attempt({ account: row.account, webUserId: row.web_user_id })
+        if (outcome !== 'pending') log.info('a deleted account’s queued unlink finished', { account: row.account, outcome })
+      }
+    } catch (err) {
+      log.warn('retrying queued unlinks failed (will try on the next reconnect)', { error: err.message })
+    } finally {
+      inFlight = null
+    }
+  })()
+  return inFlight
+}
+
+/**
+ * A live `mob.login`: when this account is queued and the shard no longer
+ * reports the deleted user's id on it, the row is done. Never on a backfill —
+ * a replayed login from before the account was linked carries no `webId` and
+ * would clear a row whose tag is still there.
+ */
+async function seenLogin({ account, webId }) {
+  if (!account) return
+  const id = webId === undefined || webId === null || webId === '' ? null : Number(webId)
+  const dropped = await pendingDb.clearIfNotAttributed(account, Number.isFinite(id) ? id : null)
+  if (dropped) log.info('a queued unlink cleared itself: the shard no longer attributes the account', { account })
+}
+
+/** Admin → Shard's list: what a deletion left linked on the shard. */
+async function listForAdmin() {
+  const rows = await pendingDb.listAll()
+  return rows.map((r) => ({
+    account: r.account,
+    webUserId: r.web_user_id,
+    state: r.state,
+    queuedAt: r.queued_at,
+    attempts: Number(r.attempts) || 0,
+    lastAttemptAt: r.last_attempt_at || null,
+    lastError: r.last_error || null,
+  }))
+}
+
+function _reset() {
+  inFlight = null
+}
+
+module.exports = { ACTOR, onUserDeleting, retryPending, seenLogin, listForAdmin, _reset }

server/utils/shardIngest.js

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ const { settings: settingsModel, events: coreEvents } = require('../core')
 const broadcaster = require('./shardBroadcast')
 const shardPush = require('./shardPush')
 const shardEngagement = require('./shardEngagement')
+const accountDeletion = require('./accountDeletion')
 const defaultLog = require('../core').logger('shard-ingest')
 
 // Notable kinds appended to the shard_events log. High-frequency/session kinds
@@ -103,7 +104,7 @@ async function resolveShardName(shard, deps) {
 
 // Apply the state-change side effect for a kind (if any). Returns a promise.
 async function applyStateChange(event, deps) {
-  const { shardState, uoLinkConfig, eventsReconcile, fromBackfill, log } = deps
+  const { shardState, uoLinkConfig, eventsReconcile, pendingUnlinks, fromBackfill, log } = deps
   switch (event.kind) {
     case 'server.hello': {
       const incoming = event.bootId || null
@@ -142,6 +143,10 @@ async function applyStateChange(event, deps) {
         // missed by skipping these — core asks every module at its own boot.
         eventsReconcile()
       }
+      // The shard is (back) on the bridge, so an unlink an account deletion left
+      // queued can be asked again. Live only, like the reconcile above: a replay
+      // says nothing about the shard being up now. Not awaited; it never rejects.
+      if (!fromBackfill) pendingUnlinks.retryPending()
       return
     }
     case 'server.shutdown':
@@ -162,6 +167,16 @@ async function applyStateChange(event, deps) {
         y: event.y,
         z: event.z,
       })
+      // A queued unlink whose account now logs in without the deleted user's id
+      // is done. Live only: a replayed login from before the link carries no
+      // `webId` and would clear a row whose tag is still on the shard.
+      if (!fromBackfill && who.acct) {
+        try {
+          await pendingUnlinks.seenLogin({ account: who.acct, webId: event.webId })
+        } catch (err) {
+          log.warn('could not check a login against the queued unlinks', { message: err.message })
+        }
+      }
       return
     }
     case 'mob.logout': {
@@ -323,6 +338,10 @@ function resolveDeps(deps) {
     // reconcile must be able to see the call without a live event engine behind
     // it.
     eventsReconcile: deps.eventsReconcile || (() => coreEvents.reconcile()),
+    // MODULE_API 1.20.0 (ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4): the unlinks an account
+    // deletion could not finish, retried when the shard says hello and cleared
+    // when a login shows the tag gone.
+    pendingUnlinks: deps.pendingUnlinks || accountDeletion,
     // Not injectable — it is the caller's statement about this frame rather than
     // a dependency. It reaches `applyStateChange` because the reconcile below is
     // the one state change that must not act on a replay; see the note there.

server/utils/uoLinkSocket.js

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ const uoLinkClient = require('./uoLinkClient')
 const shardIngest = require('./shardIngest')
 const shardState = require('../model/shardState/shardState.model')
 const newsGump = require('./newsGump')
+const accountDeletion = require('./accountDeletion')
 const log = require('../core').logger('uo-link-socket')
 
 const BACKOFF_MIN_MS = 1000
@@ -232,6 +233,10 @@ async function handleOpen() {
   backoff = BACKOFF_MIN_MS
   await uoLinkConfig.recordStatus({ status: 'connected', statusDetail: null, pluginConnected: true }).catch(() => {})
   await backfill()
+  // Unlinks an account deletion left queued while the bridge was away
+  // (ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4). This is also the boot path: onBoot starts this
+  // socket, and boot itself never calls the shard. Not awaited; never rejects.
+  accountDeletion.retryPending()
 }
 
 // A ws.hello frame: mark it seen and, on a protocol mismatch, record the error

swagger-fragment.json

@@ -1452,10 +1452,10 @@
           "Admin · Shard"
         ],
         "summary": "Get uo-link config + live status + ingestion stats (admin only)",
-        "description": "",
+        "description": "pendingUnlinks lists the game accounts a website account deletion left linked on the shard: state pending (the shard was away; retried when the bridge reconnects) or refused (a protected staff account; shard staff clear it by hand). A row goes once the shard reports a login on the account without the deleted user id.",
         "responses": {
           "200": {
-            "description": "Masked config, health and ingestion stats",
+            "description": "Masked config, health, ingestion stats and pendingUnlinks",
             "content": {
               "application/json": {
                 "schema": {