ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4 (AD10, AD11). api.onUserDeleting queues every linked
account in the new shard_pending_unlinks table, then calls the sidecar's
DELETE /link/{account} (actor web:account-deletion) and drops the mirror on 200/404.
A shard that is away leaves the row pending, retried on WS reconnect and on a live
server.hello; a protected account (403) is refused and listed on Admin -> Shard as
still linked on the shard. A live mob.login without the deleted user's webId clears
the row. coreApi ^1.20.0; core-ref pinned to website#232's merge (7bd93b8).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E14m6SuuY6i1vASFeGDBeY
7 lines
1.9 KiB
JSON
7 lines
1.9 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"$comment": "The core this module is proved against. MODULE_API.md §5.3: the frozen-manifest job clones RunicGateway/website at this exact ref, drops this module in as modules/uo and runs CORE's own routeManifest.js — nothing else can answer whether the URLs the module claims are the URLs it actually serves. Pinned rather than tracking a branch on purpose: core moves for reasons that have nothing to do with this module, and a bump is then a deliberate commit saying which core the module was last proved against, instead of an unexplained red X on someone else's PR. Bump it, regenerate routes.manifest.json, and commit both together. **It pointed at `edge` for the length of the Event System window** (org lead, 2026-09-04), and this commit ends that: `api.registerEventActions` exists only from MODULE_API 1.10.0, so under the previous `main` pin `register()` threw and the module did not load at all — the job would have been red by construction for eight phases and would have proved nothing while a real regression hid behind it. The Phase 16b cutover put 1.10.0 on `main`, so the pin comes home, and this is the same move that turns the Integration kit green again. **routes.manifest.json needed NO regeneration**: the job's own steps were run against this exact ref and answered `routes.manifest.json is current — 73 routes, all documented`, so the \"commit both together\" instruction above had nothing to pair with this time. **2026-10-30, account deletion (ACCOUNT_DELETION.md §4.4):** this module registers onUserDeleting (MODULE_API 1.20.0), so coreApi is ^1.20.0 and the pin moves past 1.11.0-1.19.0 to `main` at the sha website#232 merged as. A 1.19.0 core has no api.onUserDeleting, so register() would throw under the old pin.",
|
|
"repo": "https://gitea.whitlocktech.com/RunicGateway/website.git",
|
|
"ref": "7bd93b8bb0da734a642587f256d10c523ca39bea",
|
|
"refName": "main @ MODULE_API 1.20.0, account deletion (website#232)"
|
|
}
|