Protocol 4 (`PROTOCOL.md` §10), phase 7 as built (`PLAN.md` §20), what an operator
needs to know about it (`INTEGRATION.md`), and the in-game leg as a walk to run
(`PLAYER_WALK.md`).
**The spec.** One verb carrying the whole desired set, diffed by the plugin
against the live store; a report whose two interesting fields are the ways a push
looks like it worked and did not (`unresolved`, `pending`); drift as a report
rather than an action; and the permission hooks as a live SIGNAL rather than the
record — a hook that stops firing costs latency, not correctness.
**The finding the design turns on, written where it belongs.** A name in the store
that is not in the desired set is either something the site retired or something a
human granted, and those have opposite correct answers. The store records who
granted a permission nowhere, so only the website can tell them apart — which is
why it keeps a ledger of what it pushed, and why revoking a hand edit needed a
table of its own.
**§10.5 is a rule generalising.** "A wedged sidecar must never stall the game"
becomes "nothing the far side sends may cost the main thread unbounded work",
because `perm.sync` is the first command whose work is not bounded by its own
shape. Three bounds, each on the side that can say something useful when it is hit.
**§20.7 says plainly what is not proven**: the acceptance line needs a second,
non-admin Steam account on the rig, and nothing in the plugin has been compiled.
The walk doc carries the seven steps, including the two things to confirm on
Carbon rather than assume.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMH6bw1jXMgbyF3ZWGEzSM
Protocol 3 in PROTOCOL.md §9, the identity walk in PLAYER_WALK.md, what an
operator needs in INTEGRATION.md, and PLAN.md §19.
Seven org-lead decisions (§19.0): /link is chat and its reply is private, codes
live in plugin memory as the UO bridge does, an alphabet with no O/0/I/1, a
Steam id another account holds is refused rather than moved, the website asks
EVERY server because a code does not say which one minted it, staff can sever a
link, and the activity-row overflow belongs to core.
§19.3 is the finding worth reading: a slot router is not registered under a tier,
so this repo own OpenAPI generator described two routes fewer than the module
serves — internally consistent, and wrong. The frozen-manifest job catches it,
which was verified by deleting the two paths and watching it fail.
§19.4 is what a browser found and 122 green tests did not. Core request
primitive reads data.message; this module has answered { error } since phase 1,
so every refusal this phase exists to write rendered as Service Unavailable.
The code-from-the-game half is written down rather than claimed: a code reaches
a player and nobody else, so no console can read one (D27).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PMH6bw1jXMgbyF3ZWGEzSM
The specification the other three repositories are held against, plus the phase
record.
`PROTOCOL.md` §8 is the new contract. Its centre is one field: every frame now
carries `type` — `event`, `snapshot`, `reply`, `control` — and the sidecar files
on that and nothing else. That is the dumb-forwarder property made structural
rather than intended: ten new event kinds are zero change in Rust-Link, and only
a version adding an indexed column touches it at all.
Also in §8: the fifteen-kind catalogue and what each frame carries; `wipeId`
derived by the plugin, which REVERSES §3.2's "deriving one is the website's job"
and says why; boards re-sent on connect and on a cadence; the aggregate rule (a
hook that can fire more than once a second per player is a counter, not an
event); the void rule that stops a read-path hook vetoing a death or a login; and
`GET /feed`, a cursor route separate from `/events` because one route with two
orderings serves the wrong one to every caller that forgets the parameter.
§8.5 is the part to read twice. The classification of a kind as public or staff
is NOT on the wire, deliberately: a boundary declared by the sender is one a
compromised or out-of-date game host can widen, so the module holds a
default-deny allowlist and this table is what its test holds it against.
§8.8 corrects a catalogue rather than a defect: PLAN.md §10 sources
`rust.login.denied` from `CanUserLogin`, and that hook fires on every attempt —
the only way to learn of a denial from it is to be the denier. A denial is the
absence of an approval, and protocol 2 emits both facts so phase 10 can pair them.
`PLAYER_WALK.md` is new, and it exists because half this catalogue cannot fire
without somebody holding a mouse. Ten steps, what each one should produce, and
what counts as a pass — written so the walk can be run without watching the
output live, and so the answer afterwards is readable as a transcript.
PLAN.md §16 is phase 3 as built: the four decisions, the two defects only a
server that BOOTED with the plugin could find (a wipe id that was null for every
real session, and a two-second main-thread stall on unload), what was proven and
how, and — stated plainly rather than implied — the three measurements still
queued on the org lead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016wDDVXWMDz82WqE1i969r4
