docs(installer): mark Phase 0.4 merged in the status table #88

wtclaude · 2026-08-04T19:02:51Z

wtclaude commented

2026-08-04 19:02:51 +00:00

What & why

One-line follow-up to docs#87: the row it added for Phase 0.4 still says "🟨 In review", because it was written before the PR merged. That table is the first thing anyone reads in PLAN.md, so a stale row there is worse than no row.

Phase 0 is now complete across the board — 0.1 through 0.4 all merged. Phase 1 (installer core) is next.

How it was tested

Documentation only; the linked PR and its merge state were checked against Gitea.

Checklist

I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
The change builds and existing tests/checks pass locally.
I have added or updated tests/docs where it makes sense.
My commits are reasonably scoped with clear messages.

AI-assisted contributions (required)

No AI tools were used to produce this contribution.
AI tools were used. Tool(s): Claude Code (Opus 5). I have reviewed and understand every change, and take responsibility for it. AI-authored commits are marked with a Co-Authored-By / Assisted-By trailer.

License

I agree that my contribution is licensed under this project's license (GNU GPL v3.0 or later), and I have the right to contribute it.

## What & why One-line follow-up to [docs#87](https://gitea.whitlocktech.com/RunicGateway/docs/pulls/87): the row it added for Phase 0.4 still says "🟨 In review", because it was written before the PR merged. That table is the first thing anyone reads in `PLAN.md`, so a stale row there is worse than no row. Phase 0 is now complete across the board — 0.1 through 0.4 all merged. **Phase 1 (installer core) is next.** ## How it was tested Documentation only; the linked PR and its merge state were checked against Gitea. ## Checklist - [x] I have read [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md). - [x] The change builds and existing tests/checks pass locally. - [x] I have added or updated tests/docs where it makes sense. - [x] My commits are reasonably scoped with clear messages. ## AI-assisted contributions (required) - [ ] No AI tools were used to produce this contribution. - [x] AI tools were used. Tool(s): `Claude Code (Opus 5)`. I have reviewed and understand every change, and take responsibility for it. AI-authored commits are marked with a `Co-Authored-By` / `Assisted-By` trailer. ## License - [x] I agree that my contribution is licensed under this project's license (**GNU GPL v3.0 or later**), and I have the right to contribute it.

wtclaude added 1 commit 2026-08-04 19:02:53 +00:00

docs(installer): mark Phase 0.4 merged in the status table 90459f2c49

docs#87 landed; the row it added still said 'in review'. The status table is
the first thing anyone reads in this file, so a stale row there is worse than
no row.

whitlocktech merged commit d5838f7d4c into main

2026-08-04 19:03:57 +00:00

whitlocktech referenced this issue from a commit

2026-08-04 19:03:58 +00:00

Merge pull request 'docs(installer): mark Phase 0.4 merged in the status table' (#88) from docs/installer-0.4-status into main

whitlocktech deleted branch docs/installer-0.4-status

2026-08-04 19:03:58 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: RunicGateway/docs#88