Phase 2 is closed, so Phase 3 needs a plan before any of it is extracted.
Four decisions, and one finding that set the first of them.
The finding: because API URLs are preserved (§1.2), a feature's server and
client halves are independent. Core's client keeps calling
/api/v1/public/shard/status after the module serves it, and a module page
calls the same URL while core still does. Nothing forces vertical slices, so
the extraction is server-first then client, sliced by feature, ten slices.
Merge order within a slice is module-uo first, then website. The loader's
ownedByCore probe stops a module LOADING while core owns its prefix, but the
module's own CI never loads it into core, so its PR merges fine beforehand --
and edge then serves the feature from core right up to the moment core drops
it, with no window where the branch is missing it outright.
Criterion 1's grep reads code, not prose: filenames, import specifiers, route
path literals and declared identifiers. Core's marketing copy legitimately
says "shard" in a dozen places and a literal word grep would have failed CI on
each while proving nothing about the boundary. That copy is rewritten in its
own slice instead, which is real work with a real review rather than an
exemption hidden in a pattern.
module-uo's CI clones core at a pinned ref to freeze its route manifest --
nothing else proves the URLs it claims are the URLs it serves -- and the
module-rust dry run lands in docs/modules/ where §2.10 already aggregates
module documentation.
Also records the measured surface (72 server files, 51 client, 32 test files),
which supersedes the Phase 0 estimate, and the one kit gap: lib/format.js is
vendored by the module rather than becoming an eighth §3.4 member.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
wtclaude
749233d378