Files
docs/modules
wtclaude f80b9f95c8 docs(modules): the ingest walk, and the two-writer trap it walked into
The module half exercised against the live rig rather than only its own tests:
the working tree installed into a running core, pointed at the workstation
sidecar with a real Rust server behind it. The fresh-install path logged
`cursor started at the feed tail`, a console banid/unban arrived as two
rust_events rows carrying the wipe id, and the wipe row was created by being
mentioned rather than by any "a wipe started" call.

Then the boundary on real rows: with both ban events in the table, the public
events route answered {"events":[]} — and answered the same when asked for
player.banned BY NAME.

The trap is worth more than the proof. The state row read as online=1 with
hostname=NULL, a shape no code path writes. Two cores shared one database: a
second instance still held the phase 2 release in memory, spoke protocol 1, was
refused 409, and rewrote the row every thirty seconds. Nothing was wrong with
either. What made it look like a defect was two SELECTs in two round trips
assuming the state did not move between them — the same mistake the Pterodactyl
work recorded, and a single atomic read caught the coherent row alternating with
the other writer's.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016wDDVXWMDz82WqE1i969r4
2026-09-16 08:52:48 -05:00
..