Files
docs/website
wtclaude fd9c02130c docs(teams): Team pages and the activity feed, and what phase 3 disproved
TEAMS.md gains a dated amendment on phase 3 with five corrections, all found by
building the thing it describes:

  - §3.2 and §3.4 contradict each other about `team.member.row`'s props, and
    §3.2 wins because it is the security rule. A client slot can only receive
    what the browser was sent, so §3.4's `{ memberKey, userId, displayName }`
    means publishing both identifiers in every public roster, module installed
    or not. The slot is redeclared with what core can honestly supply.
  - §3.3's projection is an EIGHTH MODULE_API member where 1.6.0 listed seven.
    Settled by the org lead: 1.6.0 is amended in place, on the rule Protocol 4
    was given in phase 2 — a contract owes a bump only once it has reached
    `main`.
  - "the module declines" needed splitting in two before it could be built. No
    module at all withholds nothing and must serve the roster whole; a module
    whose rungs could not be consulted must serve none of it. Only the second
    fails closed, or bare core shows an empty roster on every Team page.
  - the module answers with member KEYS, not rows, so it can narrow what is
    published and cannot widen it.
  - core's five activity kinds are four until the forum lands, and a Team's
    FIRST roster emits no join items at all.

§2.11's route table gains the activity endpoint it never had, and MODULE_API.md
documents `projectRoster`, the inverted fail-closed semantics that make it
different from every other provider call, and `ctx.teams.activity.push`'s item
shape and its four contractual properties.

BACKEND_DESIGN.md: the seventh Team table, its retention, and the three public
routes' new behaviour — `enabled` on the index, the slot props on the single
Team, the per-caller row projection on the roster, and the feed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 20:17:05 -05:00
..