9 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
wtclaude	65998692ae	ci(release): sweep every tag for a missing release, not just this run's ... The first commit on this branch said the plan step "CAN recover an orphan, but only on a run that reaches it". Checking link and servuo-plugins for the same gaps showed that understated it. The recovery is VERSION-SCOPED. It computes VERSION from the newest tag plus the conventional-commit bump, then only checks refs/tags/v${VERSION}. So it recovers an orphan on the very next run and is useless afterwards: once any releasable commit lands, the next run computes a NEW version and never looks at the old tag again. The orphan becomes permanent and silent. servuo-plugins proved it, and the proof is pointed. Its v0.1.0 had been orphaned since 2026-08-04 -- tag present, no release, no assets -- while v0.1.1, v0.2.0 and v1.0.0 all published normally. The commit that ADDED the recovery to that repo was itself typed "fix(release): preflight credentials and recover the orphaned v0.1.0 tag", so it bumped to v0.1.1, and the run that introduced the recovery stepped straight past the tag it was written to rescue. The retry added in the previous commit makes an orphan much less likely, but it does not make one impossible -- a cancelled job or a dying runner produces the same state with no 500 anywhere -- and until now nothing would ever have mentioned it again. So the plan step now sweeps every v* tag and warns about any without a release. It WARNS rather than recovers, on the org lead's decision. Publishing an old version would mean building today's tree and shipping it under a tag whose tree it is not, which is worse than the inconsistency it fixes; and a routine push silently republishing ancient history is not a thing this pipeline should be able to do. Recovery stays limited to the version the run computed. It also never fails the run. A sweep that can break a good release is a sweep someone will delete. Verified by running the loop against the real repositories rather than a stub, since the only thing worth proving is that it tells a clean repo from a dirty one: link (9 tags): clean servuo-plugins (4 tags): :⚠️:Tags with no release: v0.1.0 installer (2 tags): clean and again after servuo-plugins#15 deleted that tag, where all three report clean. Every run block bash -n clean, the YAML parses, and no empty template token. Companion PRs: link#33 and servuo-plugins#15. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-24 13:57:59 -05:00
wtclaude	188e6eb882	ci(release): show the error body, and retry the release POST ... Run 75 built every artifact, pushed tag v0.1.1, then took a 500 from POST /releases one second later and exited 22. The tag was left orphaned with no release and no binaries, so the handoff fix in #22 reached no operator until the workflow was re-run by hand today. Re-running published the same four assets untouched, via the orphan-tag recovery the plan step already has. So the 500 was a race with the tag push -- Gitea had not finished processing the pushed tag when the POST arrived -- and not a bad request. Two separate gaps made that worse than it needed to be. `curl -sSf` prints no response body on an error status. All the log carried was "curl: (22) ... error: 500", so the cause had to be inferred from timestamps rather than read. Every call in this step now captures the body and prints it on failure, including the asset uploads. And nothing retried. The plan step can recover an orphan tag, but only on a run that reaches it, and a later push with no releasable commits stands down before it gets there -- which is why this one sat until someone looked. The POST now retries five times with a 5/10/15/20s backoff. 4xx is deliberately not retried: a bad token or a malformed body will not improve by being sent again, and retrying would turn a clear failure into a slow one. A give-up message names the orphan tag and says a re-run republishes. The asset uploads get the same treatment, because a release whose SHA256SUMS does not cover every binary it advertises is worse than no release -- that file is the trust anchor for an unsigned download. Verified by extracting the step's shell from the YAML and running the loop against a stubbed curl: first-try success, 500-then-success (the case that actually happened), two 500s then success, five 500s giving up, 403 and 404 aborting without retrying, and a 000 network failure being retried. bash -n clean and the YAML parses. Typed ci(...) rather than fix(...) on purpose: the plan step bumps on feat/fix, and this changes no binary, so a release here would be an empty one. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-24 11:54:47 -05:00
wtclaude	007791c4fc	fix(release): actually build the arm64 binary it packages ... The first release attempt failed at packaging: cp: cannot stat 'target/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/runicgateway-installer': No such file or directory installer#10 added linux-aarch64 in three of the four places it belongs — the rustup target, the `cp` into dist/, and the SHA256SUMS line — but never added a build step for it. Nothing ever produced the binary, so the run got all the way to packaging before noticing. No tag or release was created, so a retry is clean. Two changes: - Build arm64, with the same linker/CC/AR env pattern the Windows cross build already uses. - Name `libc6-dev-arm64-cross` in the apt install. gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu only *recommends* it and this step runs --no-install-recommends, so without it the Rust half builds and then `ring` (under ureq's rustls) dies compiling C on a missing bits/libc-header-start.h. Verified by reproducing CI in rust:1-slim-bookworm — the same apt line including --no-install-recommends, then the same cargo invocation. Builds clean and emits a 4.6 MB binary at exactly the path the packaging step reads. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-07 15:30:55 -05:00
wtclaude	84c1106d58	Merge branch 'main' into edge ... Brings main's publishing fixes onto edge so the cutover PR is a clean merge: bundle.yml publishing to the `bundles` branch, release.yml going tag-only, and the removal of bundles/*.json from main. One conflict, resolved in favour of edge: main deleted bundles/bundle-2026.08.04.json while edge had renamed it to tests/fixtures/published-bundle.json. Both changes say the same thing — published bundles no longer live on main — so the fixture is kept. It stays frozen at 2026.08.04 on purpose: it is the crate's test input, not a mirror of what is currently published. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-07 14:44:12 -05:00
wtclaude	ea7e491ba3	fix(release): tag only, before the cutover fires this for the first time ... The same two faults link/release.yml has, in the copy this repo was forked from -- and this one has never run at all, so the cutover would have been its first execution. An empty template expression written literally in a comment makes the runner fail to build the "Commit version bump and push tag" step and skip it WITHOUT failing the job. link carried that for six releases, which is why its Cargo.toml still says 0.1.0 while its tags reach v1.1.1; the tags exist because the release API creates one when it publishes. And the step pushes to main, which is protected -- the bundle job proved that today with `pre-receive hook declined`. A first release must not depend on a write to a protected branch. So the tag is the version, as in servuo-plugins. The version is still written into Cargo.toml before building, so a released binary self-reports correctly; it is simply not committed back. The prerequisites header said `main` must accept a direct push from the CI user. It does not, and it should not; that line is replaced with the reason. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-05 17:18:42 -05:00
wtclaude	6941925fa5	feat(installer): build for and install on linux-aarch64 ... Step 4 of PLAN.md §5.2, and the half that faces the operator: the release now cross-compiles aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu, and platform_key() resolves ("linux","aarch64") to the bundle key link publishes under instead of refusing the host by name. Same toolchain shape as the Windows step -- a linker plus a CC/AR pair, because ring (under ureq's rustls) compiles C and assembly. And the same packaging trap named in the sums comment: an artifact missing from SHA256SUMS is one `sha256sum -c` passes over silently, so the new binary is added to both the sums and the upload list. Two test changes fall out of the asset map growing a key: - The exact `assets.len() == 2` assertion is replaced by a check that each key CI requires is present and well-formed. An exact count would fail on the first bundle that adds arm64 -- reporting correct behaviour as a regression. - The host-binary lookup now accepts either outcome, and says why. Bundles are kept unchanged forever so `--bundle` stays reproducible, which means one published before arm64 existed can never gain that key. On such a host the run must fail with the reason rather than something that reads like a corrupt document, so sidecar_asset()'s error now says so and the test asserts it. Verified by cross-building this crate for aarch64 in a rust:1-slim-bookworm container -- ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, ARM aarch64 -- and by running fmt, clippy -D warnings and the tests on both Linux and the Windows host, since only half of service.rs compiles on either. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-05 05:34:08 -05:00
wtclaude	dff4ad41c9	feat(installer): implement Phase 1 — the installer core ... Adds the Rust crate at the repo root and implements `install` end to end for the overlay half of a deployment: resolve the published bundle, find and validate the ServUO root, refuse to deploy under a running shard, sync the plugin overlay, and record what was deployed in install.json. `doctor`, `update` and `uninstall` parse and answer with the phase they arrive in rather than "unrecognized command", and the run states plainly that the uo-link sidecar (Phase 2) and the patch tier (Phase 3) were not installed — `--patches` in particular reports REQUESTED BUT NOT APPLIED, since a quiet completion would be read as a patched shard. Landing on `edge` rather than `main`: release.yml publishes a binary on every push to main, and an installer that deploys the overlay but cannot install the sidecar is not something to hand an operator. pr-checks.yml now gates PRs into edge on the same rules, so the branch the work happens on is not the ungated one. Notable decisions, all documented in docs/installer/PLAN.md §5 Phase 1: - The code lives in a library called `rgdeploy` with a thin binary that keeps the published name. Windows' UAC installer detection refuses to launch an unsigned executable whose file name contains "install" (os error 740), and Cargo names test harnesses after their target — so a target under that name makes `cargo test` unrunnable on Windows. - The running-shard check matches processes by path, not by process name: on Linux a live shard is `mono`/`dotnet` with ServUO.exe as an argument, and a name match would report "not running" for a shard that is running. - install.json records a state (`deployed` / `kept-operator-modified`), not the run's verb, so an unchanged re-run produces an identical record and writes nothing. - The Bridge.cfg keep rule compares against the hash the installer last deployed, not the last hash it saw — otherwise a kept file is overwritten on the very next run. - Downloads are verified against the bundle's SHA256 while being written, then every extracted file is re-hashed against the release's own manifest.json, whose protocol and version are cross-checked against the bundle. Verified against a real ServUO 57.4 tree and end to end into a scratch tree: 24 files deployed, an unchanged re-run that writes nothing, an edited Bridge.cfg kept across repeated runs while code files are overwritten, bundle pinning, and a refusal with a shard running out of the tree. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-04 14:58:17 -05:00
wtclaude	60ae6f1f75	fix(ci): preflight release credentials and recover from an orphan tag ... servuo-plugins hit both of these on its first real release run; this repo runs the same engine, so it has the same two defects latent. REGISTRY_USER / REGISTRY_TOKEN were empty there, yet the tag push SUCCEEDED: actions/checkout leaves an `http.<host>.extraheader` credential in the local git config, so `git remote set-url` to a URL with empty credentials still authenticated through that leftover header. The release API call had no such fallback and returned 401. Net result was the worst available outcome — the repo tagged, no release, and a failed job. Two fixes: A credential preflight, before anything is built or pushed, gated on the run actually intending to publish so a docs:/chore:-only merge (or this repo's pre-crate no-op) still passes on a repo with no secrets. It names the missing secrets and the scope they need instead of failing wherever they happen to be used first. Orphan-tag recovery. A tag with no release behind it means an earlier run died after tagging, and the old code treated any existing tag as "nothing to release" — so that state could never clear itself: every later run would see the tag and stand down, forever. The plan step now asks the API whether a release exists for the tag, and on 404 reuses the tag and publishes the release it is missing. This deliberately overrides the RELEASE=false the bump logic just decided, which is the whole point — with the tag in place there are no releasable commits after it. Anything other than 200/404 (network failure, bad token) is refused rather than guessed, since assuming "no release" would republish over a good one. The tag step now reuses an existing tag instead of failing on `git tag`, and the changelog for a recovery run summarizes what the tag contains (previous-tag..this-tag) rather than the empty range after it. sync-project-tree gets the same preflight: its first run on main failed with an opaque `git clone` error against `https://:@host/...` that said nothing about a missing secret. Verified by extracting every run block and exercising the paths: empty secrets fail the preflight with a legible message and populated ones pass; the no-Cargo.toml guard still short-circuits to release=false; a crate with no tag still takes the seed path; and against real repo state, a tag with a release stands down while an orphan tag recovers. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-04 10:14:47 -05:00
wtclaude	ea9aad6e9b	ci(installer): add pr-checks, release, and project-tree sync workflows ... Bring this repo's CI up to parity with the other Runic Gateway repos. All three are retargeted from RunicGateway/link, which is the closest analog (same Rust toolchain, same release engine, same runner). pr-checks.yml Gates PRs into main on cargo fmt --check, clippy -D warnings, and cargo test --locked, in that order, one job — mirroring release.yml's gates so a green PR implies a green release. release.yml The conventional-commit release engine from link/, with the Rust adapter retargeted: crate at the repo root, binary runicgateway-installer, cross-compiled for x86_64 Linux and Windows. Artifact names follow PLAN.md §3. The generated changelog now carries the checksum-verification block, because releases are deliberately unsigned and SHA256SUMS is the trust anchor (PLAN.md §3) — that makes the verify instructions part of the release, not a doc someone has to find. sync-project-tree.yml (+ .gitea/scripts/gen_tree.py) Regenerates docs/installer/PROJECT_TREE.md on every push to main and opens or force-updates a PR against the docs repo. Verbatim from link/ apart from the repo/path/label env block. Crate guard This repo has no Cargo project yet — Phase 1 creates it. Landing the workflows unguarded would red-X every governance and docs PR until then, and holding them back leaves the repo ungated exactly while its conventions are being set. So both Rust workflows check for a root Cargo.toml first: pr-checks skips its gates with a notice, and release.yml's plan step sets RELEASE=false and exits. Both arm themselves the moment Cargo.toml lands, with no edit here. Verified before pushing: all three files parse as YAML, every run block passes bash -n, and the release plan step was simulated against a throwaway git repo both without a crate (release=false, exit 0) and with one (first-release path -> v0.1.0 with the changelog rendered). Not included: the bundle-manifest workflow (PLAN.md §7) and the release-dispatch hook, which are Phase 0 item 3 and depend on servuo-plugins having a release workflow first. Note for setup: release.yml and sync-project-tree.yml need REGISTRY_USER and REGISTRY_TOKEN (write:repository, plus read/write on RunicGateway/docs) configured for this repo. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-04 09:14:56 -05:00