feat(beta): phase 5 — the app page and the closed-beta signup
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s

Builds `/app/` and `/beta/`, the SQLite signup store, the rate limiting and the
export CLI of PLAN.md §8, and adds this repository's first test suite.

Four decisions of record, D26–D29 (§8, "How phase 5 built the app and the beta"):

- D26 — the screenshot slot ships empty, reserved for phase 9. §10 promised
  `/app/` "the 14 existing screenshots"; they are a July trusted-device smoke
  test against an unseeded dev instance, captured before the theming work, and
  five of the fourteen are two-factor prompts. Shipping them would break D4.
  Phase 9 already builds the rig, so it gains an emulator pass.
- D27 — the public demo is the tester target. `ConnectScreen.kt` gates the whole
  app on a validated deployment address, so a tester needs somewhere to point it.
  The beta therefore waits on the demo VM, and the page says so.
- D28 — `/beta` handles its own POST; there is no `/api/beta-signup`. An endpoint
  cannot report a validation error without JavaScript. §6's diagram is amended.
- D29 — the APK and the beta get equal billing, and the APK link is off:
  `androidApk.serviceable` is false because the published v0.5.0 build does not
  work. The panel stays and states that plainly rather than being removed.

Three mechanisms the plan did not anticipate:

- `liveBrand()` — a server-rendered page never passes through the boot rewrite,
  so `/beta` reads the mounted brand.json itself. Pasting the Play opt-in URL in
  takes effect on the next request rather than the next restart.
- `checkLinks.mjs` derives on-demand routes from `prerender = false` in the
  source. A PLANNED_ROUTES entry would have been wrong: its reverse check fires
  when a route has been built, and an on-demand route never produces a file, so
  the entry could never rot out.
- `npm test` — the five existing checks all read built output, and none of this
  logic appears there. A honeypot can stop working and leave the build identical.

Also: `checkFacts.mjs` gains the APK assets and `minSdk`, and learns that RFC 2606
reserved domains are not contact addresses; the D13 rule is otherwise unchanged.

Verified end to end against the built server: every outcome renders with no
JavaScript, cross-origin POSTs are refused, a mounted opt-in URL appears without
a restart, and the export CLI round-trips.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-24 03:50:51 -05:00
parent fbd7bbe6fd
commit 1313e748ae
21 changed files with 3366 additions and 22 deletions

View File

@@ -53,6 +53,28 @@
"androidApplicationId": "com.runicgateway.app",
"$comment_androidApk": [
"Phase 5 / `/app/`. The app is not on any store, so the only way to install it is the",
"signed APK attached to each Android-app release. `asset` and `checksums` are the two",
"assets checkFacts.mjs asserts exist on releases/latest, and `minSdk` is re-read from",
"the app's build.gradle.kts — so the download block on /app/ cannot outlive the file it",
"points at, and 'Android 10 or newer' cannot outlive the number that makes it true.",
"",
"`serviceable` is the one value here with no authority to check it against, and it is",
"deliberately manual. It answers a question no API can: does the published build",
"actually work. The org lead reports v0.5.0's does not, so the download block renders a",
"'being replaced' state instead of a link, and flipping this to true is the single edit",
"that turns the link back on once a working build is released. A check cannot run an",
"APK; a person can, and this is where they record that they did."
],
"androidApk": {
"asset": "runic-gateway-0.5.0.apk",
"checksums": "SHA256SUMS",
"minSdk": 29,
"minAndroid": "10",
"serviceable": false
},
"gitea": {
"base": "https://gitea.whitlocktech.com",
"org": "RunicGateway"