feat(teams): the roster's audience projection, and optionalAuth to resolve it

TEAMS.md §3.3, as the eighth member of MODULE_API 1.6.0 — amended in place per
the org lead, on the rule Protocol 4 was given in phase 2: a contract owes a
bump only once it has landed on `main`.

Two questions meet on the roster and they belong to different owners. WHICH
ROWS a viewer may see is the module's, because the audience rungs and their
configuration live there and core does not know what a rung is. WHAT A ROW
LOOKS LIKE stays core's.

So `projectRoster` answers with member KEYS, not rows. §3.3 said rows, and rows
would let a module widen what is published — handing back a `userId` core had
withheld — leaving core's field guarantee resting on every module's good
behaviour. Core asks which rows and re-normalises the answer through its own
public shape, so a module can narrow and cannot widen.

"The module declines" needed splitting before it could be implemented. No
module at all and a module whose rungs could not be consulted are opposite
situations: the first withholds nothing and must serve the roster whole, the
second must serve none of it. The refusal carries `projects`, and only
`projects: true` fails closed. Without the split, bare core serves an empty
roster on every Team page.

This is also the first public route whose CONTENT depends on identity, which
needed a middleware core did not have. `attachSession` only decodes a token, so
a banned account, a password change or a logout would have kept working against
the private half of a feed until the JWT expired. `optionalAuth` runs
requireAuth's full database re-validation and, on any failure, continues
ANONYMOUSLY rather than rejecting — a caller whose session is no longer good
sees the public view, which is what they are entitled to.

`GET /public/teams/:slug/activity` lands here for the same reason: §2.11's route
table had no activity endpoint though §4.3 describes a filtered feed. Paged,
with the visibility resolved from the session and never from a parameter.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-17 20:15:36 -05:00
parent aa332eda82
commit 03631d7d40
9 changed files with 486 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@@ -163,10 +163,66 @@ function normaliseLeaders(answer) {
return { ok: true, leaders }
}
/**
* `{ ok, members: [memberKey] }` — WHICH rows the module permits this viewer.
*
* Deliberately a set of keys rather than a set of rows. Core already holds the
* rows and knows their public shape; asking the module for rows back would let a
* module widen what is published — re-adding a `userId` or a `memberKey` that
* §3.2 says is never published — and core's field guarantee would then rest on
* every module's good behaviour rather than on core. So the module answers the
* question it actually owns (who may be seen at this rung) and core keeps the
* question it owns (what a member row looks like in public).
*/
function normaliseVisibleKeys(answer) {
if (!Array.isArray(answer.members)) return fail('projectRoster() answered ok with no members array')
const keys = []
for (const raw of answer.members) {
const key = str(raw)
if (!key) return fail('a projectRoster() entry is not a member key')
if (!keys.includes(key)) keys.push(key)
}
return { ok: true, members: keys }
}
const getTeams = () => call('getTeams', normaliseTeams)
const getTeamMembers = (externalId) => call('getTeamMembers', normaliseMembers, externalId)
const getTeamLeaders = (externalId) => call('getTeamLeaders', normaliseLeaders, externalId)
/**
* Ask the module which roster rows this viewer may see (§3.3).
*
* The per-audience projection is the module's because the visibility framework
* and its rung configuration are module-owned (§10.5) — core does not know what a
* rung is. Core supplies the roster and a description of the viewer; the module
* returns the member keys it permits.
*
* **"No audience model" and "could not answer" are different, and the caller must
* be able to tell them apart** — so the refusal carries `projects`.
*
* `projects: false` — no provider is registered, or the registered one does not
* implement `projectRoster`. There is no rung system to consult and nothing
* is being withheld; the roster is served at core's public shape. This is why
* the member is OPTIONAL: bare core, and a module with no audience model of
* its own, both render exactly the page core writes.
*
* `projects: true` — the module HAS an audience model and core could not reach
* it (refused, threw, timed out, answered malformed). Here the caller must
* fail CLOSED, because "leave it alone" would mean publishing the very rows
* the rungs exist to withhold. This is the one place in the Team subsystem
* where unavailability is not staleness: everywhere else a refused call
* leaves data alone, and doing that to a *visibility* question is a leak.
*/
async function projectRoster(externalId, members, viewer) {
const provider = registries.registeredTeamProvider()
if (!provider) return { ...fail('no team provider is registered'), projects: false }
if (typeof provider.projectRoster !== 'function') {
return { ...fail('provider does not project rosters'), projects: false }
}
const answer = await call('projectRoster', normaliseVisibleKeys, externalId, members, viewer)
return answer.ok ? answer : { ...answer, projects: true }
}
/** Which module is authoritative, or null. The reconciler keys sync state on it. */
const providerModuleId = () => {
const provider = registries.registeredTeamProvider()
@@ -177,6 +233,7 @@ module.exports = {
getTeams,
getTeamMembers,
getTeamLeaders,
projectRoster,
providerModuleId,
CALL_TIMEOUT_MS,
}

View File

@@ -156,6 +156,16 @@ async function listPublic({ limit = 50, offset = 0 } = {}) {
teams: visible.slice(offset, offset + limit).map(publicTeam),
total: visible.length,
...sync,
// What the `teams` nav feature flag resolves from (§3.5). True if a provider
// is registered OR any Team exists — the second half matters because Team
// rows outlive the module that filled them, and hiding the nav entry the
// moment a module is uninstalled would make every existing Team page
// unreachable from the site while still answering by URL.
//
// False only when there is nothing and no prospect of anything, which is
// exactly the bare-core case the flag exists for: a link to a permanently
// empty page is worse than no link.
enabled: Boolean(sync.configured) || visible.length > 0,
}
}
@@ -174,6 +184,19 @@ async function getPublic(slug) {
const successor = row.succeeded_by ? await teamsDb.findById(row.succeeded_by) : null
return {
...publicTeam(row),
// The three props the `team.overview` extension slot is declared with
// (§3.4). A module's slot component runs in the browser and has to know
// WHICH Team it is looking at, in its own vocabulary — `slug` is core's name
// for it and resolves nothing on the module's side.
//
// On this route only, deliberately: the index has no slot and would
// otherwise publish a module-internal identifier per row for nothing. None
// of the three names a person — they are a core row id, a game-side group
// id and a module name, and the identifiers §3.2 withholds (member keys,
// site account ids) are not among them.
id: row.id,
externalId: row.external_id,
moduleId: row.module_id,
...sync,
successor: successor && !successor.hidden
? { slug: successor.slug, name: successor.display_name_override || successor.name }
@@ -181,14 +204,50 @@ async function getPublic(slug) {
}
}
async function rosterPublic(slug) {
/**
* A Team's roster, projected for the caller's audience rung (§3.3).
*
* The ROW filter is the module's: it owns the visibility framework and its
* configuration (§10.5), and core does not know what a rung is. The FIELD shape
* stays core's — every row that survives goes through `publicMember`, which
* withholds the member key and the user id whatever the module answers. So a
* module can narrow what is published and cannot widen it, and core's "neither is
* published" guarantee does not rest on every module's good behaviour.
*
* **A module that HAS a rung system and cannot answer withholds the roster.** That
* is the one Team call where a refusal is not staleness: leaving a visibility
* answer "alone" would publish the very rows the rungs exist to withhold. A
* deployment with no module, or one whose module does not project at all, is a
* different case entirely — nothing is being withheld there, so the roster is
* served whole at core's public shape (`projects: false`).
*/
async function rosterPublic(slug, viewer = null) {
const row = await teamsDb.findBySlug(slug)
if (!row || row.hidden) return null
const [members, sync] = await Promise.all([
access.rosterWithOverrides(row.id),
syncStatus(),
])
return { members: members.map(publicMember), ...sync, rosterSyncedAt: row.roster_synced_at }
// The module gets the rows as it supplied them — this is its own data coming
// home — plus who is asking, which is all a rung decision needs.
const answer = await teamProvider.projectRoster(row.external_id, members, viewer)
let visible
if (answer.ok) visible = members.filter((m) => answer.members.includes(m.member_key))
else if (answer.projects) visible = [] // fail closed: it has rungs and we could not ask
else visible = members // nothing to fail closed ABOUT
return {
members: visible.map(publicMember),
...sync,
rosterSyncedAt: row.roster_synced_at,
// Stated rather than implied. An empty roster has three quite different
// causes — a Team with no members, a rung that shows none, and a module that
// could not be asked — and a page that cannot tell them apart will report the
// last one as the first.
projected: answer.ok,
...(answer.ok || !answer.projects ? {} : { projectionUnavailable: true }),
}
}
// ── Player ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────