feat(auth): honor and establish trusted devices on the SSO login paths
"Trust this device" did nothing for anyone who signs in with Google or Discord.
sso.controller went straight from needsTotp(user) to staging a pending-TOTP
challenge and never consulted resolveTrustedDevice, so an SSO user was asked for
a code on EVERY sign-in no matter how many times they had ticked the box — and
POST /auth/sso/totp accepted only `code`, so that step could not establish a
trust either. The password paths (web + native) were unaffected and already
worked; this closes the gap for SSO, on the website AND in the Android app.
Server:
- finishLogin and finishMobileLogin now run the same trusted-device check as
auth.controller.login, via one shared helper: honor a trust that belongs to
THIS user, stamp last_used_at, log auth.login.trusted_device. A store error
falls through to the challenge — fail closed to asking for the code.
- POST /auth/sso/totp gains optional trustDevice + deviceName, sets the rg_trust
cookie, and mirrors the password path's { trustLimitReached, devices } response
at the cap (the sign-in still completes). Recovery codes stay password-only.
Android coverage, without leaking a secret into a URL:
- The app opens SSO in a Custom Tab, which shares the system browser's cookie
jar, so the rg_trust cookie set on that TOTP form is presented back on the next
app sign-in. That alone makes native SSO skip the code. Passing the app's token
into the start URL was rejected — it would put a 256-bit secret in query
strings, Referer headers and access logs.
- To also cover the app's NATIVE password login, ticking the box sets
mobile_auth_sessions.trust_device (a boolean; never the token), and
/auth/mobile/sso/exchange mints a platform:'mobile' trust and returns
{ trustToken }. Minting there keeps the raw token on an authenticated
app→server call, out of the deep link and out of the bridge row. Best-effort:
at the cap the response just omits it rather than failing a good sign-in.
Client: the trust checkbox is no longer hidden on the SSO second step, on both
the admin and player login screens. On the mobile bridge the deep-link redirect
takes priority over the cap prompt — the sign-in succeeded and the link is
single-use, so stalling there would strand the app.
Tests: 8 new cases in server/test/ssoTrustedDevice.test.js (verified to fail
against the pre-fix controller). Full suites green — server 445, client 43 —
and routes.manifest.json is a zero-line diff: no URL moved, only +2 handlers on
/auth/sso/totp in routes.guards.json for the two new validators. Swagger
regenerated. Verified live against the running server and real MariaDB: the TOTP
step issues rg_trust and persists the row, a subsequent SSO callback carrying it
skips the code, and an invalid trust is still challenged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ mobileSsoRouter.post(
|
||||
'/exchange',
|
||||
// #swagger.tags = ['Auth · Mobile']
|
||||
// #swagger.summary = 'Exchange an SSO authorization code for mobile tokens'
|
||||
// #swagger.description = 'Redeems the single-use authorization code returned to the app callback, together with the PKCE code_verifier, for the SAME access + refresh pair as /auth/mobile/login. The code is single-use and PKCE-bound: a wrong verifier, an expired/used code, or a reused code all fail 401.'
|
||||
// #swagger.description = 'Redeems the single-use authorization code returned to the app callback, together with the PKCE code_verifier, for the SAME access + refresh pair as /auth/mobile/login. The code is single-use and PKCE-bound: a wrong verifier, an expired/used code, or a reused code all fail 401. If the user ticked "trust this device" on the TOTP form during this flow, the response also carries { trustToken } for the app to store and replay via X-Trust-Token — minted here rather than passed through the deep link so it never appears in a URL.'
|
||||
/* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/MobileSsoExchangeRequest" } } } } */
|
||||
/* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Access + refresh tokens', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/MobileTokenResponse" } } } } */
|
||||
/* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Access + refresh tokens (optionally with a trustToken to persist)', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/MobileTokenResponse" } } } } */
|
||||
/* #swagger.responses[400] = { description: 'Validation error', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/ValidationError" } } } } */
|
||||
/* #swagger.responses[401] = { description: 'Invalid/expired/used code or failed PKCE verification', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
|
||||
/* #swagger.responses[429] = { description: 'Too many attempts (rate limited)', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user