Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
41a1e84b51 feat(safety): report, block and hide, MODULE_API 1.21.0
All checks were successful
PR Checks / bot-tests (pull_request) Successful in 36s
PR Checks / server-tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m11s
PR Checks / client-build (pull_request) Successful in 49s
USER_SAFETY.md step 2 (core), with S11-S14 decided while building it.

- Reports: POST /player/reports takes any target type, core's forum
  types or a module's registered ones. One resolver
  (model/safety/targets.js) answers "what is this item, for this
  reader" and 404s an item the reader cannot see. Every report stores
  content_reports.snapshot; the queue shows a module item from it.
- Hide for everyone: POST /admin/moderation/reports/:id/hide hides the
  item through its own moderation (forum hide as staff, or the module's
  hide) and actions the report with actioned_with = 'hide'.
- Blocks (user_blocks) name an item, never a person, and land on the
  author's account first (S12); an unlinked game identity is blocked as
  itself and becomes an account block once linked (S14). Staff cannot
  be blocked; a block on someone later promoted stops applying (S8).
- Hide for me (user_hidden_items), /auth/me/blocks and /auth/me/hidden.
- Forum reads filter blocked authors and hidden items on the server and
  carry canBlock per thread and post.
- MODULE_API 1.21.0: api.registerReportTargets,
  api.registerGameIdentities, ctx.safety.forViewer and
  ctx.safety.staffAmong, so a module filters its own per-viewer feeds on
  the server (S11) and marks lines canBlock (S13).
- Web: Hide for me / Block author in the forum menus, a Blocked section
  on both account pages, Hide for everyone in the Reports queue.
- Tests, OpenAPI, route/guard/engagement manifests regenerated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E14m6SuuY6i1vASFeGDBeY
2026-10-30 05:41:00 -05:00
d1ae8f943f feat(account): self-service account deletion, MODULE_API 1.20.0
All checks were successful
PR Checks / bot-tests (pull_request) Successful in 37s
PR Checks / client-build (pull_request) Successful in 49s
PR Checks / server-tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m14s
ACCOUNT_DELETION.md phase 2 (core): a member deletes their own account on
the website, and the admin route runs the same procedure.

- DELETE /api/v1/auth/me/account: typed username, password always (AD7),
  and a 2FA or recovery code when 2FA is on. A wrong password or code is
  400, not 401 (AD12), so the app's refresh-on-401 never replays it.
  409 password_required and last_admin; the demo's shared logins are
  locked.
- auth/accountDeletion.js: module hooks first, then one transaction that
  reserves a staff username (reserved_usernames, AD9) and deletes the row,
  then a Teams reconcile, the audit entry (no username) and a notice to
  the old address (new protected template auth.account-deleted).
- MODULE_API 1.20.0: api.onUserDeleting({ userId, deletedBy }), before the
  delete, 10 s limit, cannot veto (AD10, AD11).
- utils/displayAuthor.js: a deleted account's username snapshots read
  "[deleted player]" to members and the stored name, marked, to staff
  (AD5, AD6). Used by the forum, the Reports queue, the guest list and
  the Team digest. A deleted account drops off Forum guests (AD13).
- Reserved names refuse at every username write, answered as "taken".
- Web: Delete my account on the player and staff Account pages; staff
  views mark "(deleted account)".
- OpenAPI regenerated; route manifest and engagement manifest regenerated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E14m6SuuY6i1vASFeGDBeY
2026-10-29 18:32:19 -05:00
fff14848f1 feat(moderation): member-raised abuse reports, to site staff only
TEAMS.md §5.6. **Core has had no user-facing report flow of any kind** — the
`moderation`, `mod_notes` and `appeals` tables are all either staff-initiated or
Discord-sanction-shaped, and nothing anywhere let a member say "this is a
problem". That was survivable while every piece of content on the site came from
staff; phase 5 lets players write to each other, so it stops being.

The gap has a specific shape: leaders moderate their own Team's forum, and a
Team's leaders are exactly the people who will not report their own Team. So the
whole point of this queue is a path that routes AROUND a Team's own leadership.
Org lead settled it on 2026-08-18: **reports are site administration only** —
there is no leader-facing view of this queue, not even a read-only one scoped to
their own Team. §5.6's "a leader may also see and act on reports for their own
Team" is not implemented and is not deferred.

`content_reports` is deliberately generic — `target_type` is a VARCHAR so a wiki
page or a news comment becomes a value rather than a table — and the queue is
mounted beside appeals under /admin/moderation rather than under Teams, because a
staffer working a queue should have one place to work.

**§5.6's literal unique key has a defect and this does not copy it.** Written as
(target_type, target_id, reporter_user_id, status) it makes CLOSED rows collide
with each other too: reporter reports a post, staff dismiss it, the behaviour
recurs, they report again — and the second dismissal is an UPDATE into a tuple
that already exists, so working the queue starts throwing duplicate-key errors on
the first repeat reporter. The key is on a generated `open_marker` instead, the
same trick `team_forum_grants.active_marker` uses: 1 while open, NULL once
closed, and NULLs are distinct — which is what §5.6's prose asks for, "one open
report per (target, reporter)".

Two other departures from the doc, both small and both flagged in the docs PR:
`handled_note`, because a queue whose resolution reason lives only in an
activity_log line is one where the next staffer to see a repeat report cannot
find out why the last was dismissed; and a CASCADE on `team_id`, so a deleted
Team does not leave a queue full of reports about content that no longer exists.

Also here: a report is filed against a target the model verifies really belongs to
the Team the request came through, or the queue's per-Team filter would quietly be
lying; the queue resolves every row's target in three batched reads rather than
N+1, which is §5.6's fourth rule (uploader, size and sniffed type without
hunting) actually paying for §5.5.4's attribution table; a target that has since
been hard-deleted comes back null and the report still lists, because "somebody
reported this and by the time we looked it was gone" is a fact a moderator needs;
and every transition writes activity_log, `dismissed` included — a queue where
acting is audited and declining to act is not is one where the cheapest way to
make a report vanish leaves no trace.

`teams_forum_edit_window_minutes` gains its range validation on the admin settings
PUT and is seeded at 15, so the value on the settings screen is the value in
force. Route manifest and OpenAPI regenerated: 6 operations added, 0 lost.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 12:51:42 -05:00
8fd0d82580 refactor(server): split admin shard, uo-link, email, discord-bot, settings and dashboard into capability routers
All checks were successful
PR Checks / bot-install (pull_request) Successful in 17s
PR Checks / client-build (pull_request) Successful in 24s
PR Checks / server-tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m21s
PR 4 of the in-place admin router split (docs/website/API_V2_PLAN.md § Phase 2),
and the last admin one: it moves the entire residual 33 and DELETES
admin.routes.js. Every one of the 110 admin routes is now declared in a
capability router. No URL, gate or handler changes.

  shard.router.js      (16)  /admin/shard
  uoLink.router.js     ( 5)  /admin/uo-link
  email.router.js      ( 6)  /admin/email
  discordBot.router.js ( 2)  /admin/discord-bot
  settings.router.js   ( 2)  /admin/settings
  dashboard.router.js  ( 2)  GET /dashboard + PUT /site-mode, at the group root
  admin.routes.js            deleted, was 33

No gate moved to router level. Every adminOnly in the residual file was
per-route, and modAccess on /shard must stay per-route because half that router
must not have it — which keeps the per-route handler count intact, the one
number routes.guards.json can actually check.

/shard is the first prefix where two tiers share one router: 7 self-service
account-linking routes (no extra gate, served by the same player/shard
controller handlers, tagged `Admin · Account`) alongside 9 in-game staff ops on
modAccess. Prefix ownership beats tag grouping — splitting by tag would put two
routers under one prefix for no gain. The tag mismatch stays; retagging is a
real spec diff and belongs in a PR about tags.

dashboard.router.js is the one router mounted at the group root rather than a
prefix: GET /dashboard and PUT /site-mode share no path segment. That is safe
only because the file declares no router-level middleware — a bare use(gate) in
a root-mounted router would run for every request passing through toward
another mount. The file carries a comment saying so.

Acceptance — all four gates zero-diff:
  routes.manifest.json    unchanged (200 public + 2 internal)
  routes.guards.json      unchanged (no route lost or gained a gate)
  swagger-output.json     unchanged (198 operations)
  api-route-inventory.json already in sync
plus 434 server tests green.

Verified separately, because no gate can catch it: introspecting the built
stack, all 59 literal admin paths still dispatch to their own layer — nothing
is captured first by a /:param sibling. The manifest sorts its entries, so
declaration order is invisible to it.

Also repoints the comments that referenced admin.routes.js by name
(botActivity/moderation controllers, the town-crier cap mirror in
announceJobs.logic.js) and generalizes the "the path is on the line after
router.get(" rationale in routeManifest.js, README.md and pr-checks.yml, which
was never about that one file.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-27 20:02:28 -05:00
028ba8c5e4 feat(moderation): appeals (6c) + Discord reversal on approve (6d)
All checks were successful
PR Checks / server-tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m59s
PR Checks / client-build (pull_request) Successful in 9m32s
PR Checks / bot-install (pull_request) Successful in 9m37s
Players whose linked Discord identity was banned or muted can now submit
an appeal from the portal and track it; staff get a queue in the admin
moderation section to claim and resolve (approve/deny) appeals. Approving
a ban/mute appeal best-effort asks the Discord bot to reverse the action
(unban / clear timeout) via the internal API and posts a mod-log embed; a
down bot never fails the resolution (reversal_status is recorded).

- Schema: new server-owned `appeals` table (no cross-owner FK to
  mod_actions; existence validated in app code).
- Server: model/appeals/* + player appeals controller (submit/mine/
  eligible/withdraw) and admin queue handlers (list/claim/resolve/
  per-user) under the existing admin+moderator gate; one-active-appeal
  enforced app-side; eligibility keyed on the caller's linked Discord id.
- 6d: bot POST /internal/mod-reverse (+ modLog.postReversal) and
  server botInternalClient.reverseModAction, wired into resolve().
- Client: admin Appeals queue + resolve modal, ModerationUser appeals
  tab, player Appeals page (submit/withdraw), nav + routes + api methods.
- Docs: swagger annotations + component schemas, regenerated output.
- Tests: appeals controller + pure suites (server npm test 224 green).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XmHdsbnLzDMAVQkAoTQSBe
2026-07-18 22:01:06 -05:00
3027bb0400 Capture member/filter/spam events for the dashboard (Phase 6b)
Light up the moderation dashboard's previously-empty widgets by persisting the
event streams the bot only reacted to in-memory before.

Schema (bot-owned)
- member_events: join/leave, with invite_code/inviter_* for best-effort invite
  attribution on joins
- filter_hits: word / foreign-invite filter deletions (matched + action_taken)
- spam_hits: rate_limit / mass_mention / mass_emoji detections

Bot
- new models memberEvents/filterHits/spamHits
- guildMemberAdd records the join with invite attribution; new inviteTracker.js
  keeps an invite-use cache (GuildInvites intent + inviteCreate/inviteDelete) and
  diffs it on join to find which invite was used — best-effort, never blocks
  auto-role
- new guildMemberRemove records leaves
- messageFilter records filter/spam hits alongside the existing warn/mute;
  inviteFilter now returns the offending code; detectSpam identifies which spam
  rule tripped (preserving the rate-limit-first side-effect order)
- mod_actions still logs the resulting warn/mute — the new tables are additive

Server
- summary extended with joins/leaves/invite_joins/filter_hits/spam_hits per window
- new feeds: /api/v1/admin/moderation/{members,filter-hits,spam-hits}

Client
- overview now shows 8 tiles (mod actions + joins/leaves/filter/spam, joins tile
  notes "N via invite") plus an Events panel with Members/Filter/Spam tabs;
  removed the coming-soon note

Verified: 119 server unit tests, client build, 14-check DB-backed smoke, and a
browser click-through of every tile and events tab (incl. invite attribution).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019rao86n5cXpwAyjdBFEshV
2026-07-05 10:36:09 -05:00
b0c0d1fe9b Add moderation dashboard, user history & notes (Phase 6a)
Surface the Discord bot's moderation data on the admin panel: a read-only
staff dashboard over the existing mod_actions log, per-user history, staff
notes, and a new moderator role. No bot changes.

Schema
- users.role ENUM gains 'moderator' (CREATE + idempotent ALTER for existing DBs)
- new server-owned mod_notes table (staff_only/admin_only visibility)

Server
- model/moderation: read mod_actions via the shared pool (documented read-only
  cross of the bot/server ownership boundary), correlate accounts through
  user_identities (provider='discord'), flag automated actions via
  staff_user_id === bot_config.application_id; pure reshaping helpers isolated
  in moderation.pure.js so they unit-test without opening a DB pool
- model/modNotes: list/add with role-gated admin_only visibility
- admin/moderation.controller + routes under /api/v1/admin/moderation/* gated by
  requireRole('admin','moderator'); admin_only note writes require admin
- allow assigning 'moderator' in the user create/update validators

Client
- /admin/moderation overview (window tiles, type-filterable recent feed, user
  lookup) and /user/:discordId history (tabs + notes with add-note)
- RoleGate; AdminLayout filters nav and confines moderators to their section
- moderator badge + action-type/auto badges

Deferred (see plan): 6b bot event capture (joins/leaves/filter/spam), 6c appeals
(needs public accounts), 6d /internal/mod-reverse bot reversal callback.

Verified: 116 server unit tests, client build, DB-backed model smoke, full
HTTP/RBAC e2e, and a browser click-through of the dashboard.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019rao86n5cXpwAyjdBFEshV
2026-07-05 10:16:34 -05:00