46f43a5fd68abc40fcc0aa2a979caa20787ed05b
8 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cecd72915f |
feat(teams): the slash-command seam, and the first command through it
Phase 7 of TEAMS.md. `api.registerSlashCommands` stops throwing: a module registers a command's DEFINITION and its HANDLER together, the bot pulls the definitions over the internal listener and runs none of our code, and the handler executes here — forced by the bot container having no `modules` volume, and the right boundary anyway. Registration validates what Discord would reject as a batch (names, description lengths, the four option types, required-before-optional), because the bot registers the whole set in one PUT and a single bad entry costs every command including the bot's own. Commands are not namespaced under their owner — there is no dot in Discord's name grammar — so collisions are first-come with the holder named. The dispatcher is the access boundary: `linked` has no Discord equivalent, so the platform-side permission default can only ever be advertising. It resolves the actor by `auth_providers.kind` rather than the id slug, treats a banned account as unlinked, bounds a handler under the bot's own timeout, and keeps `ok` outside the envelope so a handler cannot forge it. Liveness is asked at both the pull and the dispatch. The registries have no removal path, so a module an operator disables at runtime would otherwise keep a live handler behind a command Discord still advertises. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 92631347f9 |
feat(teams): the reconciler, its four refusal gates, and ctx.teams (API 1.6.0)
Core's projection of the module's Teams, kept in step (docs/website/TEAMS.md
§2.4), plus the two ctx members a module pushes through.
The four gates are the file, and each is invariant 1 in a different costume --
module unavailability is staleness, never emptiness:
1. getTeams() not ok -> record the failure, touch NOTHING, return.
2. ok but empty, core holds >=1 -> quarantine; apply only if the NEXT
authoritative answer, an interval later,
agrees.
3. getTeamMembers() not ok -> that Team's roster untouched and stale; the
other Teams sync normally.
4. ok but zero members, had some -> the same two-strikes quarantine, per Team.
Gates 2 and 4 exist because an authoritative-looking empty answer during a cold
start is the one failure indistinguishable from a real wipe. "Every Team on the
shard disbanded at once" costs one interval to confirm; getting it wrong empties
every roster on the site.
Events are an optimisation, never the source of truth. Member and leadership
deltas apply at once for a Team core already knows; team.created and
team.disbanded only ask for a run. §2.2 scopes archival to an authoritative full
list, so a repeated or spurious disband event costs a reconcile rather than a
Team -- and a Team invented from a delta would have no name, no roster and no
leaders anyway.
Two columns TEAMS.md did not contemplate, both on `teams`:
- roster_synced_at, because team_sync_state holds one row per MODULE and gate 3
leaves ONE Team behind while the others sync. Without a per-Team stamp that
Team's page would report the module's last success as its own -- exactly the
staleness the gate exists to surface.
- members_empty_since, gate 4's per-Team quarantine. The twin of
team_sync_state.pending_empty_since, which is per module and cannot express it.
One real bug found by its own test. The roster upsert was writing is_leader, so a
refused getTeamLeaders() left every member demoted -- the roster had already
written `leader: false` before the authoritative call was even made. §2.5 is
explicit that path 2 is answered by getTeamLeaders(), so is_leader is now set on
INSERT only (seeding a Team so it is not leaderless while that call fails) and
moved afterwards by setLeaders() alone. Two writers for one column was the whole
defect.
MODULE_API_VERSION 1.6.0 on both halves -- they state one contract and a module
declares one coreApi range. The number covers the whole Team surface per Part 11;
the members arrive by phase. registerTeamProvider, ctx.teams.publish and
ctx.teams.reconcile are live. ctx.teams.activity.push (§4, phase 3) and
api.registerSlashCommands (§7.1, phase 7) are present and THROW with a sentence
naming their phase, rather than being absent or silently accepting data into
tables that do not exist yet.
39 tests here, and the ctx surface guard in moduleLoader.test.js updated -- it
caught the addition, which is what it is for. Server 809 passed, client 192
passed, 0 failed.
Refs docs/website/TEAMS.md §2.2, §2.3, §2.4, Part 11, Part 12 phase 2
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 1433b60d6c |
feat(modules): PublicLayout takes a shell, MODULE_API_VERSION 1.5.0
The Integration Kit's acceptance run (Phase 5 slice 3) put a cold agent in front
of the kit alone and asked it to build a module for a second game. It built one
that works — and its page rendered outside the site.
PublicLayout supplies the chrome and not the body. Every core public page wraps
its own content in `<div className="shell-... page-body">`: the centred column,
the top and bottom padding, and — through `page-body { flex: 1 }` — the thing
that pushes the footer to the bottom of the viewport. Nine of nine core pages do
it, so the omission has never shown. A module cannot do it: it receives
PublicLayout through the UI kit and those two class names appear in no contract.
The result was a page at x=0 with the footer riding up under the content, which
is the exact failure MODULE_API.md §3.4 says the kit exists to prevent.
So the wrapper moves behind the component a module already has:
<PublicLayout shell="narrow"> // or "mid" / "wide"
`shell` is opt-in and omitting it is 1.4.0's behaviour exactly, so core's nine
pages are untouched and keep their own wrapper. An unrecognised width falls back
to narrow rather than to nothing — a module page at the wrong width still looks
like the site; a page with no wrapper does not.
1.5.0 is minor, not major. §3.4 makes *changing* a kit component's props major
because that breaks a call already written; adding an optional one breaks
nothing. module-uo's `coreApi: "^1.3.0"` still resolves.
The width map and its fallback live in client/src/lib/pageShell.js rather than in
the component, for the reason lib/adminNav.js does: the client runner has no DOM
and cannot import .jsx at all, so a rule inside a component is a rule no test can
reach. Five tests cover it, including that every width it offers is a class
theme.css actually defines — the contract now names those widths to module
authors, so a rename has to fail here instead of silently in someone's page.
Also from the same run: modules/shared.js called the UI kit "seven" members while
exporting eight (§3.4's table has five rows because PageState contributes three),
and its note said AdminPage "appears in §3.4's table" when the table dropped it in
Phase 2 PR 7.
742 server + 192 client tests pass (+5). routes.manifest.json and the OpenAPI
spec regenerate byte-identical — no route changed.
Verified in a browser against the acceptance module (MODULE_API.md §7.7), which
is the only place this seam is visible: the untouched build renders full-bleed,
and shell="narrow" lands the page in the same column as core's own.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 5410e7e0b3 |
chore(modules): bump MODULE_API_VERSION to 1.4.0 — the sidecar rule
Phase 5 decision 4 (MODULE_SYSTEM.md §2.11.1): a module does not open a connection to a game server from the website process. It talks to a sidecar, which owns the durable copy of the game's state. No member was added, removed or changed — the surface is identical to 1.3.0. Minor rather than major because module-uo's `coreApi: "^1.3.0"` still resolves and module-uo already complies, but a module written against 1.3.0 could satisfy every member and still be built the wrong way round, which is what this number now says. The rule itself is MODULE_API.md §2.7 (docs, separate PR) and is the one prohibition there with no CI behind it: an outbound socket is not statically detectable the way an internal require is (§5.1). 742 server + 187 client tests pass; routes.manifest.json and swagger-output.json regenerate byte-identical. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 5b5006c365 |
feat(modules): a third slot, nav icons, and api.BASE (phase 3, slice 3)
The three things core owes the client half before it can leave, all additive, all MODULE_API 1.2.0 → 1.3.0. `player.invite.accepted` is the third extension slot. Core's invite page owned a UO game-account step — it read a `gameAccountSignup` flag out of core's own settings and posted to a shard route — and an invite is a core concept that staff receive too, so the page stays and its optional next step becomes a slot. Named for the place, like the other two. Whether there is a step at all is the filling module's call, made from data core does not have; core keeps the shell, the skip control and the destination. `icon` on a nav item, because without it the six extracted UO rows would have been the only text-only entries in a sidebar where every other row has a glyph. Core supplies no fallback — an invented one is core making a presentation choice for content it knows nothing about. `icon` was already among the fields an override may not touch, so the concept predates a module being able to send one. `api.BASE` was in §3.5 from the first draft and never actually published. `request` is fetch-only, so an EventSource builds its own URL, and the shard's live feed is two of them; the alternative is a module hardcoding `/api/v1`, which asserts something about core that core has not promised. `AcceptInvite` is the one legitimate reader of `extensionFor` outside Slot.jsx: the answer decides a NAVIGATION, not a decoration. Decoration goes inside `<Slot wrap>`, which is why `hasExtension` stayed deleted. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 1d1350558b |
feat(modules): client extension slots (phase 3, slice 2)
The client twin of the server's declareSlot/registerExtension, and the same rule in both halves: core declares a slot, only core declares one, and at most one module fills it. Core renders <Slot name> and gets nothing back when the slot is unfilled, so an instance with no module installed renders exactly what it rendered before -- the same untouched-path guarantee withModuleNav makes. A slot is named for a PLACE, never for a meaning. Core supplies the position and the styling; the label, the target, the data and whether anything renders at all are the module's. The moment core types a slot by its content it has re-acquired the game semantics phase 3 exists to remove. This is the one place the client registry is not fail-open. An unknown slot, a non-component and a second fill all throw, matching checkExtensionShape server-side, because a dropped nav row costs a link the viewer can reach another way while a silently dropped extension is invisible to everyone including its author. A throw is always a programming error and never a race: core declares in its own bundle and every module chunk is a deferred script injected after it. Reading stays fail-safe -- undeclared and unfilled both read null -- and a filling component renders inside an error boundary. That asymmetry is where the client differs from the server: a module route that throws costs the module's own page, but an extension throws inside CORE's, and the whole reason core keeps ownership of that page is that it stays usable. Core decorates a slot through <Slot wrap>, not by asking whether it is filled. The obvious alternative is right about the unfilled case and wrong about the failed one -- the extension is filled, so the separator renders, and then the component throws into the boundary and leaves the separator behind on its own. wrap puts core's decoration inside the boundary where it shares the extension's fate. Found in a browser, with the footer's separator, which is the only place either could have been found. MODULE_API_VERSION 1.1.0 -> 1.2.0, both halves: the two state ONE version. Contract: docs/website/MODULE_API.md 3.7. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| f50541f374 |
feat(modules): ctx additions and the post-hook registry (API 1.1.0)
Everything the extraction needed from core that ctx did not already offer. Additions only, so minor. ctx.activity.log, because an admin action a module performs has to land in core's one audit log or the trail has a hole exactly where a module operates the game -- a module keeping its own log would be a second place to look, which in practice means a place nobody looks. Write-only; reading the log is the admin panel's job and it spans every actor. ctx.users.getById, one function for one caller: the admin.users.detail slot router needs the user its prefix names. ctx.site.baseUrl, because a module has to build absolute links and §2.7 forbids it reading core's APP_BASE_URL -- a getter, not a captured string, so it cannot go stale against the env. ctx.middleware.rateLimit is core's makeLimiter, plus accountChangeLimiter handed over whole. The split is deliberate: a module states its own window and cap because it knows what its endpoints cost, and takes the plumbing from core so there is one express-rate-limit in the process and one place a breach is logged. accountChangeLimiter is shared policy -- core's /auth/me and /player/account sit behind the same counter -- so a module's account-change route has to land IN it rather than beside it. marketLimiter was UO policy living in core's file and leaves with the route it guards. registerPostHook is the fourth registry, and the last thing binding core to the module. Core's post controller called newsGump.syncPost directly: core's CMS naming a UO file. It now publishes what it already knows and a subscriber decides what to do with it. Not folded into registerAnnounceLeg, which fires on the same transition, because a leg is a one-shot DELIVERY with retry and classification while a post hook maintains idempotent STATE, runs on delete as well as save, and refreshes silently on an edit. Also fixes a real loader defect the extraction exposed: schema table names were matched against the RAW file, so a fragment whose header says "every CREATE TABLE carries IF NOT EXISTS" was rejected for a prefix violation on a table called `carries`. module-uo's fragment hit exactly that. Both scans now read split statements, which strip comments -- the same class of bug as a boundary check failing on its own documentation. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| ec1ca7e794 |
feat(modules): the filesystem module loader
Phase 2 PR 2 of docs/website/MODULE_SYSTEM.md 2.7. Adds
server/src/modules/{loader,semver,version}.js: the synchronous scan of
MODULES_DIR, manifest validation, prefix and table-name collision
rejection, per-module try/catch and the mount into the three tier
routers behind the MODULE_API.md 4.5 dispatch guard.
Two decisions the contract left open, both now written up there:
- The load trigger is one explicit modules.load(tierRouters) call in
app.js, not a lazy scan (API 7.6). Accessors throw until it has run,
because "no modules installed" is a real answer a caller must not be
handed by accident.
- Whether core owns a prefix is asked of the live tier routers via
express's own layer.match(), skipping root-mounted layers, rather than
a hardcoded table -- the spike's was already stale when written
(API 4.3).
Mounting is a second pass after every module is validated. Doing it
inside the scan loop makes the first module's layers indistinguishable
from core's, so the second module claiming a taken prefix is told it
collided with core and the module-versus-module check is unreachable.
registerExtension/NotificationStreams/AnnounceLeg and onBoot/onShutdown
throw "not available until phase 2 PR 4/5" rather than no-op; an
accepting stub would let a module believe it had registered something.
No schema replay, no boot dispatch, no installed_modules reconcile --
those are PRs 3 and 5, and until PR 5 a record's state is in memory only.
No module ships on the volume, so nothing an operator or client can see
changes: 842 tests pass, routes.manifest.json is unchanged at 229 routes
and swagger-output.json regenerates byte-identical.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
