241 client tests pass (224 before).
**The forum panel becomes a forum.** It was "Announcements" with one composer;
it now has two, because phase 5 split one server capability into two: `canPost`
means "may open a discussion" and every participant may — a granted guest with no
game character included, which is path 3 doing its job — while `canAnnounce` is
the leader-only half `canPost` used to carry alone. Threads gain replies, an edit
control, per-post moderation and a report control, all still inside the one slot
the module declares, still navigating by `?thread=`.
**Almost nothing here is the client's decision, and the file says so.** `canPost`,
`canAnnounce`, `canReply` and each post's `canEdit`/`editableUntil` are read, not
computed. The one local judgement is a ticking clock that WITHDRAWS an edit offer
whose deadline passed while the page sat open — it can never grant one, because a
time-bounded permission must not take its clock from the party it bounds. That
asymmetry is the first thing client/test/teamForum.test.js asserts.
The panel's pure parts moved to `lib/teamForum.js` so they can be tested without a
browser, following teamActivity.js and teamAdmin.js. Two of them are subtler than
they look:
* `stripToText` decodes entities AFTER stripping tags, and `&` last of all.
Decoding first turns an author's literal "<script>" into a real tag the
strip pass then deletes — silently losing text that was never dangerous.
* `threadSummary` counts REPLIES, which is one fewer than `postCount`. Showing
the raw count tells a reader a brand-new thread already has one reply.
**Three admin surfaces.** The forum settings screen gains the edit-window field
(0 = posts permanent once written). The reports queue is a new screen beside
Appeals — under moderation rather than under Teams, because a staffer working a
queue should have one place to work and `target_type` is deliberately open-ended,
so the next reportable thing arrives as a row rather than as another nav entry.
Its copy tells a member where a report lands and that reporting changes nothing,
because a member who expects a post to vanish and watches it stay reports it
again. There is no leader-facing view and there is not meant to be.
And the per-Team forum moderation ledger finally renders: the route and
`api.admin.teamForumModeration()` have both existed since phase 4 with nothing
calling them, which made `actor_role` — the column that keeps a leader's ordinary
housekeeping distinguishable from a staff intervention — readable only from a DB
client.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The forum had nowhere to live. TEAMS.md 3.1 gave it a CORE page, and phase 3
deleted every core Team page — Teams is a contract primitive and core does not own
the word for one. So the forum follows the activity feed: module-uo declares a
second place on its guild page and core fills it.
TWO slots rather than one, because a slot holds one component and the first fill
wins. Stacking the feed and the forum into a single fill would take from the module
the ability to place core's two contributions separately on its own page, which is
the whole point of the module owning it.
The panel navigates by SEARCH PARAM (?thread=12) rather than by route. A thread has
to be linkable and core cannot mount a route for one — the route belongs to the
module's page — so a search param gives a shareable URL under whatever path the
module chose, with the back button intact and no core route anywhere in it. That is
why the fill is one component holding both a list view and a detail view.
Post bodies arrive already rendered by the server under the current image policy,
which is why they are set as HTML here rather than sanitised again: the body was
cleaned on write with the forum's own profile, and any <img> in it was emitted by
core's own renderer with a fixed attribute set. A client-side sanitiser would have
to strip exactly the tag core just decided to add. The published image mode is read
only to decide which composer to draw — never what renders.
The composer puts an uploaded file's URL into the body as TEXT, not as a tag. The
author never writes markup, which is what keeps the operator's policy enforceable.
The admin panel carries both settings, the always-on help text, and the
confirmation dialog with its two checkboxes and one recorded acknowledgement — plus
the three additions the org lead settled: attribution and staff removal, the
warning that disabling later does not delete existing files, and who "users"
actually means. A stale acknowledgement raises a banner and freezes the settings;
it does not turn uploads off.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
