4ac917c3a3445a44343dd2c3b9eea43600bde0ce
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c970caee16 |
fix(teams): let a post-moderation mistake reach the model that explains it
Found on the live rig. `moderatePost` answers `pin` with «"pin" applies to a thread, not to a post» and an invented action with "Unknown moderation action" — the distinction exists because they are different mistakes and a caller who made the first one has a bug worth naming precisely. The route's validator listed only the four actions a post accepts, so `pin` never got there: it came back as a generic "Validation failed". The precise message was written, documented, unit-tested — and unreachable through the API, which is the worst of both, because the branch reads as live code and is only exercised by its own test. The validator now lists all eight and lets the model discriminate. Both answers are 400, neither is a security boundary, and widening the list is not removing it — an action outside the enum still stops at the validator, which the added route test asserts alongside the `pin` case. Nothing else the walk exercised needed changing. The whole phase 5 surface was driven against a real server, real MariaDB and real sessions across four identities — an ordinary member, a granted non-member guest, a Team leader and a staffer — plus a browser pass over the forum panel, the reports queue, the per-Team forum ledger and the settings screen. Notably confirmed live: a locked thread refuses replies from all four identities at 409; a hidden post renders for the leader and staff with Unhide and **no Edit control for anyone**; the report queue answers 200 to staff and 403 to the leader, the member and the guest alike; and turning the edit window down to 0 stops the author while leaving staff unbounded. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 128de0ff2e |
test(teams): phase 5's server surface, and the negative property under it
1008 pass (972 before). The tests worth reading first are the ones that pin a
property no screen would look different without:
* **The edit window is decided on the server, twice.** One test proves the read
path stamps `canEdit` per post per viewer; another proves the WRITE path
re-derives it from `created_at` and refuses a stale edit even though the
client was told it could — because a time-bounded permission must not take its
clock from the party it bounds.
* **A locked thread refuses staff too**, asserted over member, leader and staff
in one loop, at 409 rather than 403: well-formed request, refusing state.
* **delete → restore is reversible for images.** Without the second half of the
pair a restored post returns its words and loses its pictures a retention
window later, silently — the test asserts both calls and that `hide` makes
neither.
* **Post moderation recomputes the thread's counters** rather than nudging them;
the test runs hide → unhide → hide, which is the cycle a delta gets wrong.
* **acceptance: nothing in the report model is reachable by a Team leader.** The
negative property is the whole point of §5.6 and negatives are what nobody
notices going, so it is asserted directly — the module's function surface is
pinned, and `queue`/`handle` are checked not to mention leadership at all. If
a leader-facing queue is ever wanted it is the org lead's decision, and this
test is what makes somebody ask.
* **A report never changes the content it is about**, proved by stubbing every
mutation the forum has to throw. If filing a report touched a status then
"report" would BE moderation, and the first person to work that out would have
found a way to hide anything on the site.
The test suite caught one real defect: `describeTarget` returned `undefined` for a
hard-deleted target, and `undefined` is dropped by JSON.stringify — so the
documented `target: null` would have reached clients as an absent key.
Two phase-4 tests were updated rather than added to, both because phase 5 changed
what they describe: `canPost` split into `canPost` (open a discussion, everyone)
and `canAnnounce` (leaders), and `discussion` is no longer a refused thread type.
Phase 5's four new player routes are added to acceptance criterion 2's list, so
"with the forum off every forum route 404s" keeps covering the whole surface.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 57286594e7 |
test(teams): the four acceptance criteria, and regenerate the API artifacts
Four tests are named "acceptance" and are Phase 4's criteria verbatim. Each names a property the code around it can lose without any screen looking different: 1. A granted, unlinked account reads the forum, is absent from the member rows, and is still refused external-platform eligibility. The membership projection is asserted byte-identical across a grant, which is what "non-contamination" means in practice. 2. With the switch off every forum route 404s AND nothing is read or written on the way there — a guard that 404s after loading the thread is one that still bumped a counter. 3. The stored HTML is byte-identical between `disabled` and `remote`; only the rendered output differs. That is the property the renderer-owned design exists to give, and it is what makes flipping the policy back a no-op rather than a migration. 4. Selecting `uploads` without a matching acknowledgement is refused server-side, with the admin checkbox bypassed. Plus the ones that are not criteria but are the same kind of claim: an author cannot smuggle an <img> or its attributes through in any mode, http and non-image URLs stay plain links, a leader cannot revoke a staff-issued grant, a demoted account stops protecting the grants it made, moderation records which authority was exercised, and a RIFF container that is not WebP is not accepted as one. Twelve new routes in the manifest, all annotated and in the OpenAPI spec. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| cf2666e5bc |
feat(teams): the Team read API, the moderation routes, and Admin -> Teams
The eighteen routes of docs/website/TEAMS.md §2.11, their OpenAPI annotations,
and the staff screen that drives them.
Two rules shape the read model. Hidden means absent from every public surface --
the index, the lookup and the roster alike, and a hidden Team 404s
indistinguishably from one that does not exist, because "absent" includes not
confirming it is there. And staleness is surfaced rather than silent: every
public payload carries { configured, stale, lastSyncAt }, so a page can say how
recently the projection was confirmed instead of presenting stale data as
current.
The public roster withholds both the member key and the user id -- one is a
game-internal identifier, the other names a site account. `linked` answers the
only question a public page has without publishing which account. The module's
per-audience field projection is phase 3's; this is a conservative core one.
The §2.9 gate is enforced per REQUEST, not per route. A moderator may call all
eighteen; three of them mean something different when they do, and the server
decides from the role it re-validates on every request rather than from a token
claim. The client has no "file as request" argument to get wrong.
Found by booting the real server against the real database, and not by any test:
**the index and the by-slug lookup disagreed about what exists.** listPublic was
keyed on a registered team provider while findBySlug is not, so with no module
installed `/teams` returned an empty list while `/teams/:slug/members` served a
full roster -- the index denying a Team that direct URLs answered for in full.
The rows are core's and they outlive the module that filled them: an uninstalled
module leaves a projection that is unmaintained, not one that stopped existing,
and `configured: false` is how a client learns that. The read side no longer
takes the provider into account at all. There is now a test named for the
property.
Also verified live: the public routes answer anonymously, an unknown and a hidden
slug both 404, the player and admin tiers 401 an anonymous caller, a seeded
roster projects correctly, and the reconciler logs that it is staying idle with
no provider registered rather than failing a boot.
Process obligations, all done: #swagger.* annotations on every route, `npm run
swagger` regenerated (18 paths in the spec, no dangling $refs, and the schemas
they reference added), `npm run routes:manifest` regenerated -- additions only,
184 public routes -- and BACKEND_DESIGN.md updated across the schema section and
all three tier tables.
Admin -> Teams follows the ModulesAdmin precedent: everything that decides what a
row SAYS lives in lib/teamAdmin.js, which is plain JS with tests, and the view
renders it. That split earns itself here specifically -- the screen's job is to
make "the shard has no Teams" and "core has not been able to ask for two hours"
impossible to confuse, and those two produce the same empty table. The four
freshness states are named and tested for exactly that reason, and the last
provider error is shown verbatim rather than paraphrased.
The button labels follow the caller's role: a moderator sees "Request publish",
so the pending result is not a surprise. Hiding is offered to everyone with no
gate, matching the server.
Server 894 passed, client 206 passed, client build clean. 17 route tests, 20
client display tests.
Refs docs/website/TEAMS.md §2.11, Part 12 phase 2
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
