a981b2b854cf0609cd55be9275613914503b87a2
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5779d15150 |
feat(engagement): retention — three sweeps and one recorded refusal
ENGAGEMENT.md Phase 14, the last phase of the workstream. Four engagement
tables grew on every fire and nothing had ever deleted from any of them.
Three of them now have a horizon, swept nightly by one worker
(utils/engagementRetentionPrune.js — setInterval + unref + stop(), batched
1000 x 50, each table's failure caught on its own so a lock timeout on one
does not leave the other two unbounded):
engagement_sends 180 days engagement_sends_retain_days (7-3650)
engagement_cooldowns 30 days engagement_cooldowns_retain_days (2-3650)
engagement_outbox 30 days engagement_outbox_retain_days (2-3650)
The fourth, engagement_suppressions, does not expire, and that is the
recorded decision rather than an omission: a suppression is a standing
decision, and ageing out a hard bounce re-mails an address that already
bounced. The way out stays deliberate, and is now reachable per row.
Six decisions were settled by the org lead before any code. Two of them
widened the phase past what was offered:
* the send-log horizon is admin-configurable, so retention got a SCREEN
(Admin -> Engagement -> Retention) where team_activity and
user_notifications keep theirs in invisible settings rows. The send-log
horizon changes what an operator-facing page is able to show, so it has
to be visible; the other two came with it, because "what does this
deployment keep" is one question.
* the suppression purge, which cost a Phase 9 decision. The list
deliberately stripped address_hash from every row, so the only way out
was a window.prompt asking the operator to retype an address the screen
has never shown them. The row had no handle at all. The hash is now
returned: this route is admin-only and an admin can already suppress and
unsuppress any address they can name, so it grants no capability they
lack. GET /sends still strips its own.
The outbox sweep is TERMINAL-ONLY and that is a correctness rule: a
scheduled row is a send this deployment still intends to make (delay_seconds
can put one a day out) and a sending row may be mid-flight.
One shipped defect had to be fixed for the sweep to be a bound at all.
reclaimStale returned every stale sending row to scheduled, and MAX_ATTEMPTS
is consulted only on a graceful retry outcome — so a send that killed the
process mid-flight cycled sending -> scheduled -> sending forever, never
terminal, therefore never eligible for any sweep. It now fails an exhausted
row BEFORE reclaiming the rest; the order is the fix.
Two indexes (idx_engo_sweep, idx_engs_sweep): every existing index on those
tables has created_at in second position, which serves a per-rule window and
is useless to a whole-table horizon.
Proved twice: engagementRetentionSql.test.js against a real MariaDB (7
tests, incl. the acceptance case and the wrong reclaim order run
deliberately), and the live stack, where a 90-day-old cancelled row was
swept and a 90-day-old scheduled row survived.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| c8d45733b6 |
fix(engagement): two defects the Phase 11b live walk found in core
Both are invisible to a fixture and loud on a real database, which is why the walk is the phase's acceptance rather than a formality. 1. registerEngagementSeeds validated `max_sends_per_hour` and then dropped it from the normalized rule. The column is NOT NULL, so every one of the 25 module-seeded rules failed to insert at boot. The registry test asserted the REJECTION of a bad ceiling and never that a good one survives; it now asserts the normalized rule against `engagementRules.db.insert`'s own column list, so the next field added is covered the day it is added. 2. The cooldown claim runs inside the engine's per-channel loop and its key was (rule, user, subject). So the first channel of a rule claimed the cooldown and every later one was reported as cooled -- and `inapp` is ranked first deliberately, so a rule naming email + in-app delivered the inbox item and silently never the mail. Core's own `news.post` rule has that shape. Phase 11b's decision 8 requires the letter and the inbox item to fire together. `channel` joins the PRIMARY KEY (the org lead's decision 12: a cooldown is per delivery, not per occasion). Migrated in place behind an information_schema guard, because MariaDB has no conditional form of a key change and replaying schema.sql would otherwise fail on every boot after the first. 1551 core tests green; both new tests verified by reverting each fix in turn. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 2079aaf667 |
feat(engagement): the rules engine, cooldowns and outbox (engagement Phase 4a)
Phase 4 of docs/website/ENGAGEMENT.md, split 4a/4b at the org lead's direction. This is 4a: the engine, server only, with no HTTP surface at all. A fired trigger now produces outbox rows and send-log entries; Admin - Engagement - Rules and the segment composition UI are 4b. Five tables (rules, audience segments, cooldowns, outbox, sends), the sweep worker, audience resolution, condition evaluation, the grace window and its cancellation, and the save-path validation 4b's form will call. engagementEmit's Phase 2 log line becomes the engine call. Two settled questions this phase was blocked on: Q2 (multi-instance) - neither SKIP LOCKED nor documented single-instance: the outbox claims each row with a compare-and-set into the 'sending' state the ENUM already carried. It makes the outbox safe for two instances, not the deployment. Q4 (admin surface) - its own top-level nav group, built in 4b. Two defects in the plan's own section 4, both found by building it: The global UNIQUE(dedupe_key) was data loss. A dedupe key names the EVENT, and one event is one row per (rule, user, channel) - so a fifty-person audience would have had one row admitted and forty-nine silently ignored. Scoped. Section 4.1's single INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE cooldown claim always passes against this codebase's pool: the mariadb connector defaults foundRows:true, so a no-op update reports affectedRows 1 rather than 0. It is two statements now, with the interval guard in a WHERE clause. The second defect is why there is a second test file. The stubbed suite was green against the broken claim, because a stub can only agree with whoever wrote it; engagementEngineSql.test.js runs the raw statements against a real MariaDB and skips when there is none. Verification: 43 new tests green in engagementEngine.test.js, 12 more against MariaDB 11.8, and the whole path exercised end to end against a live database - per-subject cooldowns, conditions, the CAS claim, the send log's honest failure detail, and dormancy on uninstall. The three pre-existing Windows-only CRLF failures in the generated-artifact tests are unchanged from clean edge. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
