aca4d231796b0437d1d320c72806a1f02c00a9ca
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2a56cbf22a |
feat(teams): fire the four events, and the routes that configure them
The roster sync tickles at most ONCE per stream per run, not once per member: a tickle is content-free, so five people joining in one sweep is five identical notifications and one piece of information. Suppressed on a Team's FIRST roster, the same condition the activity feed uses and the half where it matters more — importing a 155-member guild would otherwise wake every one of their phones. Forum notifications fire from the CONTROLLER, not from the forum model. That file takes an already-resolved access decision and reads no membership table by design; the fan-out reads both to compute its recipients, so calling it from inside would make the forum model transitively depend on exactly what its header says it must not touch. The model returns a `notify` key the controller destructures out before the response, so the API's answer to "did my post save" is unchanged. `pageUrlTemplate` joins the team provider — the one thing phase 6 found that the design of record had not anticipated. Phase 3 left core with no Team page and therefore no way to LINK to one, so a notification email could name a Team and not take you to it. It is data rather than a callback: a function would put a module hook on the mail path to produce a string that never varies. Relative paths only, and protocol-relative is refused with absolute. The unsubscribe endpoint is the only write in the public tier and the only route with no `siteMode` — the reader is in their mail client, and the mail went out before the site went into maintenance. POST always answers 200, valid token or forged: distinguishing them would be an oracle for which (user, Team) pairs exist. GET redirects and acts on nothing, so a mail client's link scanner cannot mute Teams nobody asked to leave. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| aa332eda82 |
feat(teams): the activity feed, its two writers and its retention
TEAMS.md Part 4. `team_activity` takes items from two sources and treats them
identically on the read path: core writes its own membership and rename items
with source='core', and a module pushes game items through
`ctx.teams.activity.push`, which stops throwing and starts working.
Core writing here too is deliberate — the rendering path is exercised by core's
own content from day one, so the feed is never empty on a deployment whose
module pushes nothing.
Three rules shape the model:
- core never composes a summary. It arrives already rendered and is stored
verbatim; core cannot phrase "gained 15,000 gold" for a game whose
vocabulary it does not know.
- visibility fails closed. An item with no stated visibility is `members`.
- a push never throws at its call site. It is called from inside a game-event
handler, and a storage problem of core's must not become the module's
control flow.
Core emits four of the five kinds §4.2 names — `core.forum.thread` has nothing
to emit it until the forum lands in phase 4 — and emits none of them for a
Team's FIRST roster: importing a 155-member guild is one Team arriving, not 155
people joining, and a join per member would bury every real event under the
import and reach the row cap on day one.
Retention ships with the feed rather than after someone notices. A nightly
worker applies an age horizon and a per-Team row cap, both settings; either
alone has a hole, since age lets one busy guild write a million rows inside the
window and a cap keeps a dead Team's feed forever.
The sync now reads member ROWS rather than keys, replacing the `memberKeys`
call rather than adding to it: the feed needs each changing member's display
name and prior `is_leader`, and the upsert is about to overwrite both.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 8fe2e01466 |
feat(teams): reserved-name screening, auto-hide, and the admin-approval gate
The one place untrusted game data becomes a public page (docs/website/TEAMS.md
§2.8), and the gate on releasing it (§2.9).
A Team's name is written by a player, in the game, with no review, and this
platform turns it into a public page, a URL and eventually a Discord channel
name. Someone naming their guild "Admin" or "<Brand> Staff" gets an
official-looking page on the operator's own site for free.
Hide, never reject. Core cannot refuse a name -- the guild already exists in the
game and core is a mirror of it, not an authority over it. A match hides the Team
from public surfaces and files it in a review queue, and it keeps working
completely for its own members: their forum, their grants, their notifications.
The people in it are not being punished for a name their leader chose.
That asymmetry -- a false positive costs a human glance, a false negative costs
an impersonated staff page -- is what lets the matcher be conservative. It is not
licence to be sloppy the other way: a check that fires on "Badminton" gets
switched off, and then the real cost is paid in full. So matching is whole WORDS
after normalisation, never substrings, following the precedent
scripts/checkModuleIdentifiers.js set for exactly this reason.
Three matcher gaps found by writing the tests, all real impersonation vectors:
- "Guild of Moderators" did not match `moderator`. Only a trailing s off the
WHOLE term is stripped, so "Nomads" still does not match `mod`.
- "G.M." normalises to two single-letter words and matched nothing. A run of
two or more single-letter words is now also offered joined. Deliberately not
a whole-name condensation, which would re-admit substring matching.
- The multi-word condensed form was already handled and is what makes
"RunicGateway" match the two-word term -- the form an impersonator would
reach for, since it is what the Gitea org and every URL use.
Terms resolve at CHECK time, never baked in, so renaming a deployment protects
the new name without a redeploy. A failed settings read falls back to the static
role and project terms rather than to an empty list: screening fewer terms is
bad, screening none is the whole hole.
Re-screening runs on every reconcile, over names no human has ruled on. Names are
immutable per row, so it only ever changes an outcome when the TERM LIST changed
-- an operator adding one, or a rename -- which is exactly what a create-time-only
check would miss forever. `name_reviewed_at` is what makes a staff decision
sticky; without it an override would be undone every fifteen minutes.
The gate is scoped to three actions because they publish untrusted game-sourced
strings, and to nothing else. Ordinary forum grants, leadership overrides,
archives and forum moderation still apply immediately and are audited. A
moderator initiating one files a pending request; an admin applies at once.
Never four-eyes on admins: users.role defaults to admin and `npm run seed`
creates exactly one, so most deployments have precisely one and a second-approver
rule would wedge them with no way out.
Hiding is deliberately NOT gated. Publishing untrusted data needs a second pair
of eyes; withdrawing it needs to be possible at once, by whoever is on duty.
Two concurrency details worth the review: a decision moves the row out of
`pending` under a guard and applies its effect only if the row actually moved,
so two admins clicking approve cannot double-apply or overwrite each other's
record; and a JSON payload is parsed defensively, because the driver returns
JSON columns already parsed on some versions and as a string on others.
Screening is stubbed in the reconciler's own tests -- it is a separate unit, and
the real call reads settings, which this suite must never do against a live
database. That was caught the hard way: the suite went from 11s to hanging, and
the cause was the reconciler reaching a dead pool through the new call.
44 tests in the reconciler file (up from 39), 19 for the matcher, 25 for the
gate. Full suite 877 passed, 0 failed.
Refs docs/website/TEAMS.md §2.8, §2.9, Part 12 phase 2
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 92631347f9 |
feat(teams): the reconciler, its four refusal gates, and ctx.teams (API 1.6.0)
Core's projection of the module's Teams, kept in step (docs/website/TEAMS.md
§2.4), plus the two ctx members a module pushes through.
The four gates are the file, and each is invariant 1 in a different costume --
module unavailability is staleness, never emptiness:
1. getTeams() not ok -> record the failure, touch NOTHING, return.
2. ok but empty, core holds >=1 -> quarantine; apply only if the NEXT
authoritative answer, an interval later,
agrees.
3. getTeamMembers() not ok -> that Team's roster untouched and stale; the
other Teams sync normally.
4. ok but zero members, had some -> the same two-strikes quarantine, per Team.
Gates 2 and 4 exist because an authoritative-looking empty answer during a cold
start is the one failure indistinguishable from a real wipe. "Every Team on the
shard disbanded at once" costs one interval to confirm; getting it wrong empties
every roster on the site.
Events are an optimisation, never the source of truth. Member and leadership
deltas apply at once for a Team core already knows; team.created and
team.disbanded only ask for a run. §2.2 scopes archival to an authoritative full
list, so a repeated or spurious disband event costs a reconcile rather than a
Team -- and a Team invented from a delta would have no name, no roster and no
leaders anyway.
Two columns TEAMS.md did not contemplate, both on `teams`:
- roster_synced_at, because team_sync_state holds one row per MODULE and gate 3
leaves ONE Team behind while the others sync. Without a per-Team stamp that
Team's page would report the module's last success as its own -- exactly the
staleness the gate exists to surface.
- members_empty_since, gate 4's per-Team quarantine. The twin of
team_sync_state.pending_empty_since, which is per module and cannot express it.
One real bug found by its own test. The roster upsert was writing is_leader, so a
refused getTeamLeaders() left every member demoted -- the roster had already
written `leader: false` before the authoritative call was even made. §2.5 is
explicit that path 2 is answered by getTeamLeaders(), so is_leader is now set on
INSERT only (seeding a Team so it is not leaderless while that call fails) and
moved afterwards by setLeaders() alone. Two writers for one column was the whole
defect.
MODULE_API_VERSION 1.6.0 on both halves -- they state one contract and a module
declares one coreApi range. The number covers the whole Team surface per Part 11;
the members arrive by phase. registerTeamProvider, ctx.teams.publish and
ctx.teams.reconcile are live. ctx.teams.activity.push (§4, phase 3) and
api.registerSlashCommands (§7.1, phase 7) are present and THROW with a sentence
naming their phase, rather than being absent or silently accepting data into
tables that do not exist yet.
39 tests here, and the ctx surface guard in moduleLoader.test.js updated -- it
caught the addition, which is what it is for. Server 809 passed, client 192
passed, 0 failed.
Refs docs/website/TEAMS.md §2.2, §2.3, §2.4, Part 11, Part 12 phase 2
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
