e0c961c690b8e104bacf24345408c8adf951b784
6 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1433b60d6c |
feat(modules): PublicLayout takes a shell, MODULE_API_VERSION 1.5.0
The Integration Kit's acceptance run (Phase 5 slice 3) put a cold agent in front
of the kit alone and asked it to build a module for a second game. It built one
that works — and its page rendered outside the site.
PublicLayout supplies the chrome and not the body. Every core public page wraps
its own content in `<div className="shell-... page-body">`: the centred column,
the top and bottom padding, and — through `page-body { flex: 1 }` — the thing
that pushes the footer to the bottom of the viewport. Nine of nine core pages do
it, so the omission has never shown. A module cannot do it: it receives
PublicLayout through the UI kit and those two class names appear in no contract.
The result was a page at x=0 with the footer riding up under the content, which
is the exact failure MODULE_API.md §3.4 says the kit exists to prevent.
So the wrapper moves behind the component a module already has:
<PublicLayout shell="narrow"> // or "mid" / "wide"
`shell` is opt-in and omitting it is 1.4.0's behaviour exactly, so core's nine
pages are untouched and keep their own wrapper. An unrecognised width falls back
to narrow rather than to nothing — a module page at the wrong width still looks
like the site; a page with no wrapper does not.
1.5.0 is minor, not major. §3.4 makes *changing* a kit component's props major
because that breaks a call already written; adding an optional one breaks
nothing. module-uo's `coreApi: "^1.3.0"` still resolves.
The width map and its fallback live in client/src/lib/pageShell.js rather than in
the component, for the reason lib/adminNav.js does: the client runner has no DOM
and cannot import .jsx at all, so a rule inside a component is a rule no test can
reach. Five tests cover it, including that every width it offers is a class
theme.css actually defines — the contract now names those widths to module
authors, so a rename has to fail here instead of silently in someone's page.
Also from the same run: modules/shared.js called the UI kit "seven" members while
exporting eight (§3.4's table has five rows because PageState contributes three),
and its note said AdminPage "appears in §3.4's table" when the table dropped it in
Phase 2 PR 7.
742 server + 192 client tests pass (+5). routes.manifest.json and the OpenAPI
spec regenerate byte-identical — no route changed.
Verified in a browser against the acceptance module (MODULE_API.md §7.7), which
is the only place this seam is visible: the untouched build renders full-bleed,
and shell="narrow" lands the page in the same column as core's own.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 5410e7e0b3 |
chore(modules): bump MODULE_API_VERSION to 1.4.0 — the sidecar rule
Phase 5 decision 4 (MODULE_SYSTEM.md §2.11.1): a module does not open a connection to a game server from the website process. It talks to a sidecar, which owns the durable copy of the game's state. No member was added, removed or changed — the surface is identical to 1.3.0. Minor rather than major because module-uo's `coreApi: "^1.3.0"` still resolves and module-uo already complies, but a module written against 1.3.0 could satisfy every member and still be built the wrong way round, which is what this number now says. The rule itself is MODULE_API.md §2.7 (docs, separate PR) and is the one prohibition there with no CI behind it: an outbound socket is not statically detectable the way an internal require is (§5.1). 742 server + 187 client tests pass; routes.manifest.json and swagger-output.json regenerate byte-identical. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 5b5006c365 |
feat(modules): a third slot, nav icons, and api.BASE (phase 3, slice 3)
The three things core owes the client half before it can leave, all additive, all MODULE_API 1.2.0 → 1.3.0. `player.invite.accepted` is the third extension slot. Core's invite page owned a UO game-account step — it read a `gameAccountSignup` flag out of core's own settings and posted to a shard route — and an invite is a core concept that staff receive too, so the page stays and its optional next step becomes a slot. Named for the place, like the other two. Whether there is a step at all is the filling module's call, made from data core does not have; core keeps the shell, the skip control and the destination. `icon` on a nav item, because without it the six extracted UO rows would have been the only text-only entries in a sidebar where every other row has a glyph. Core supplies no fallback — an invented one is core making a presentation choice for content it knows nothing about. `icon` was already among the fields an override may not touch, so the concept predates a module being able to send one. `api.BASE` was in §3.5 from the first draft and never actually published. `request` is fetch-only, so an EventSource builds its own URL, and the shard's live feed is two of them; the alternative is a module hardcoding `/api/v1`, which asserts something about core that core has not promised. `AcceptInvite` is the one legitimate reader of `extensionFor` outside Slot.jsx: the answer decides a NAVIGATION, not a decoration. Decoration goes inside `<Slot wrap>`, which is why `hasExtension` stayed deleted. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 1d1350558b |
feat(modules): client extension slots (phase 3, slice 2)
The client twin of the server's declareSlot/registerExtension, and the same rule in both halves: core declares a slot, only core declares one, and at most one module fills it. Core renders <Slot name> and gets nothing back when the slot is unfilled, so an instance with no module installed renders exactly what it rendered before -- the same untouched-path guarantee withModuleNav makes. A slot is named for a PLACE, never for a meaning. Core supplies the position and the styling; the label, the target, the data and whether anything renders at all are the module's. The moment core types a slot by its content it has re-acquired the game semantics phase 3 exists to remove. This is the one place the client registry is not fail-open. An unknown slot, a non-component and a second fill all throw, matching checkExtensionShape server-side, because a dropped nav row costs a link the viewer can reach another way while a silently dropped extension is invisible to everyone including its author. A throw is always a programming error and never a race: core declares in its own bundle and every module chunk is a deferred script injected after it. Reading stays fail-safe -- undeclared and unfilled both read null -- and a filling component renders inside an error boundary. That asymmetry is where the client differs from the server: a module route that throws costs the module's own page, but an extension throws inside CORE's, and the whole reason core keeps ownership of that page is that it stays usable. Core decorates a slot through <Slot wrap>, not by asking whether it is filled. The obvious alternative is right about the unfilled case and wrong about the failed one -- the extension is filled, so the separator renders, and then the component throws into the boundary and leaves the separator behind on its own. wrap puts core's decoration inside the boundary where it shares the extension's fate. Found in a browser, with the footer's separator, which is the only place either could have been found. MODULE_API_VERSION 1.1.0 -> 1.2.0, both halves: the two state ONE version. Contract: docs/website/MODULE_API.md 3.7. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| f50541f374 |
feat(modules): ctx additions and the post-hook registry (API 1.1.0)
Everything the extraction needed from core that ctx did not already offer. Additions only, so minor. ctx.activity.log, because an admin action a module performs has to land in core's one audit log or the trail has a hole exactly where a module operates the game -- a module keeping its own log would be a second place to look, which in practice means a place nobody looks. Write-only; reading the log is the admin panel's job and it spans every actor. ctx.users.getById, one function for one caller: the admin.users.detail slot router needs the user its prefix names. ctx.site.baseUrl, because a module has to build absolute links and §2.7 forbids it reading core's APP_BASE_URL -- a getter, not a captured string, so it cannot go stale against the env. ctx.middleware.rateLimit is core's makeLimiter, plus accountChangeLimiter handed over whole. The split is deliberate: a module states its own window and cap because it knows what its endpoints cost, and takes the plumbing from core so there is one express-rate-limit in the process and one place a breach is logged. accountChangeLimiter is shared policy -- core's /auth/me and /player/account sit behind the same counter -- so a module's account-change route has to land IN it rather than beside it. marketLimiter was UO policy living in core's file and leaves with the route it guards. registerPostHook is the fourth registry, and the last thing binding core to the module. Core's post controller called newsGump.syncPost directly: core's CMS naming a UO file. It now publishes what it already knows and a subscriber decides what to do with it. Not folded into registerAnnounceLeg, which fires on the same transition, because a leg is a one-shot DELIVERY with retry and classification while a post hook maintains idempotent STATE, runs on delete as well as save, and refreshes silently on an edit. Also fixes a real loader defect the extraction exposed: schema table names were matched against the RAW file, so a fragment whose header says "every CREATE TABLE carries IF NOT EXISTS" was rejected for a prefix violation on a table called `carries`. module-uo's fragment hit exactly that. Both scans now read split statements, which strip comments -- the same class of bug as a boundary check failing on its own documentation. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| e0927bc255 |
feat(modules): the client registry, window.__rg and the chunk's script injection
Phase 2, PR 7 of docs/website/MODULE_SYSTEM.md 2.7 — the client half's
delivery. A module's prebuilt chunk is served, injected, handed core's React
and its UI kit, and its routes are rendered by App.jsx. The registry is empty
on a bare core, so nothing an operator can see changes.
Client:
- modules/registry.js — registerRoutes/registerNav/registerFeatureProvider,
with the URL namespace written by core, never by the module
- modules/shared.js — window.__rg: React, react-dom/client, react-router-dom,
react/jsx-runtime, the registry, the seven-member UI kit and the request
primitive, frozen
- App.jsx reads routesFor for all three areas; nav consumption is PR 8
- main.jsx publishes the global, then mounts on DOMContentLoaded
Server:
- the loader validates client.entry and publishes clientChunks() and
clientEntryUrls(); an entry in the module root is rejected, because the
directory it sits in is what gets served
- app.js mounts each chunk at /modules/<id>/ behind the module's state guard
with no-cache; anything else under /modules is a 404, not the SPA shell
- htmlShell injects the tag before </body>, so core's bundle runs first
wherever a bundler puts it
Found by loading a real chunk in a browser, and fixed here: core mounted before
any module chunk had evaluated, because document.readyState during a deferred
script is 'interactive', not 'loading'. Every test passed against that build.
The smoke is written down in MODULE_API.md 7.7.
933 server tests (+23), 123 client tests (+14). routes.manifest.json unchanged
at 230 routes; the OpenAPI spec regenerates byte-identical.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
