efa9db73304552dd8bb7a84030b258c6320f79f7
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3a7a08425c |
fix(engagement): the six defects the browser pass found (Phase 4b)
Driving the two screens in Chrome, after the API walk had already found the two
in Phase 4a's code. None of these is visible from a test or from curl.
Two cost an operator something real:
- The Audience dropdown rendered EMPTY before a trigger was chosen. There is
genuinely nothing it may offer without a ceiling, but a select with zero
options reads as broken rather than as waiting. It now says "Choose a
trigger first..." and is disabled.
- A `members` audience with no saved audience reaches NOBODY, and only the
preview button said so. That is the design, but it is also the default the
instant a members-ceiling trigger is picked - so the rule saves, gets
switched on, and mails nobody with nothing on screen saying so. The editor
now says it inline, and stands down once a preview has answered the same
question more precisely.
One the server was already refusing, just too late:
- The composer offered "exclude" on the only row, building an `and` whose
every child is a complement. The server refuses it correctly but only after
a save, and it is one checkbox away at all times. Now refused inline, in the
operator's words.
Three wording and layout:
- the template-key input truncated its placeholder, and said "optional until
Phase 5" - a sentence about the plan document, not about the deployment
- "segment" leaked into a screen that says "saved audience" everywhere else.
The API, schema and docs keep saying segment (one word for one table);
translated at the point of display only
- the composer repeated its AUDIENCE heading above every row
Client only - no server change, so swagger and the route manifest are untouched.
Client suite 316/316; all six verified in the browser after the fix.
- [x] AI-assisted: written with Claude Code (Opus)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 4b45eddb5d |
feat(engagement): Admin - Engagement - Rules and Audiences (engagement Phase 4b)
The admin surface over the Phase 4a engine: two screens, twelve routes and the
reach preview. Nothing in the engine changed; what changed is that an operator
can now reach it.
Four decisions settled by the org lead before any code:
- segments get their OWN nav entry, "Audiences", not a tab of the rules screen
- the on/off switch is its own PATCH route, not a full PUT
- the reach preview is a count only, on demand
- a rule can be hard-deleted; the send log survives it
The switch is the one with real content in it. A PUT re-validates against the
registries as they are NOW, so the rules a re-validating toggle cannot switch
off are exactly the three an operator most wants stopped: a rule whose module
was uninstalled, one naming a channel that is gone, and one whose trigger has
since narrowed its ceiling under a saved audience. PATCH .../enabled writes one
column and always works. Switching ON unvalidated is safe because the engine
re-checks the ceiling at send time.
The preview calls the engine's own resolver rather than a second query that
agrees with it today, and answers a count and nothing else - the resolver's
output for a module-declared segment is a set of players derived from game data.
It reports `capped` at the 5000-row bound (the count is a floor, not a total),
`reason` for an `owner` audience (which resolves per event and has no advance
answer), and `permitted` so the editor cannot show a healthy number beside a
save the server will refuse.
Two defects found by walking it against a live server, both in Phase 4a's code:
1. A rule pointing at a DORMANT segment read as healthy. listAnnotated asked
only whether the segment ROW existed. The other shape of the same failure
is a segment sitting exactly where it was whose every audience belongs to
an uninstalled module: same outcome, nothing deleted. Uninstalling a module
under an enabled rule produced a rule the screen showed as on and firing.
The expression walk now lives in engagement/segments.js as
`missingAudiences` and both lists ask it.
2. "1 rule still use this segment" - the delete refusal pluralised the noun
and not the verb, in the sentence an operator reads when told no.
Also: a rule's trigger is now a stated rule rather than an omission in the
UPDATE statement (its cooldowns, queued sends and history are all about one
trigger id); a condition tree the editor cannot render is shown read-only rather
than flattened, because flattening changes which events fire the rule; and
literals are coerced client-side to the type the trigger declared, with anything
that does not parse passed through unchanged so the server's refusal names the
variable.
Tests: 21 new server tests (test/engagementAdmin.test.js) and 25 client ones
(client/test/engagementRules.test.js), all green. The single failure in the
server suite (`the committed manifest matches the declarations in the tree`) is
the known Windows CRLF artifact and fails identically on clean edge.
Companion docs PR: docs#184.
- [x] AI-assisted: written with Claude Code (Opus)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
