.gitea/workflows/pr-checks.yml

@@ -86,9 +86,13 @@ jobs:
       - name: Build client
         run: npm run build --prefix client
 
-  bot-install:
-    # No tests/build to run; a clean install still catches a broken or
-    # out-of-sync lockfile before it ships in the bot image.
+  bot-tests:
+    # The install still runs first and still catches a broken or out-of-sync
+    # lockfile before it ships in the bot image — that was this job's whole
+    # purpose until phase 7 (TEAMS.md §7.1) put real logic in the bot: it now
+    # pulls slash-command definitions from the app, merges them into the
+    # whole-set PUT, and runs the defer→dispatch→edit path. None of that is
+    # reachable from the server suite, and phases 8 and 9 add more of it.
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
     steps:
       - uses: actions/checkout@v4
@@ -99,3 +103,7 @@ jobs:
           cache-dependency-path: bot/package-lock.json
       - name: Install bot deps
         run: npm ci --prefix bot
+      - name: Run bot tests
+        # Node's built-in runner, no browser and no Discord connection — the
+        # interaction is a fake that records what was called on it.
+        run: npm test --prefix bot

bot/package.json

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
   "main": "src/server.js",
   "scripts": {
     "start": "node src/server.js",
+    "test": "node --test test/*.test.js",
     "dev": "nodemon src/server.js"
   },
   "keywords": ["discord", "discord.js"],

bot/src/discord/discordManager.js

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ const { Client, GatewayIntentBits, REST, Routes } = require('discord.js')
 
 const createLogger = require('../utils/logger')
 const commands = require('./commands')
+const dynamicCommands = require('./dynamicCommands')
 const messageFilter = require('./messageFilter')
 const scheduler = require('../scheduler/scheduler')
 const roleMenuHandler = require('./roleMenuHandler')
@@ -22,12 +23,46 @@ let status = 'disconnected' // disconnected | connecting | connected | error
 let statusDetail = null
 let lastConnectedAt = null
 
+// One whole-set PUT of the bot's own commands plus whatever the app has
+// registered (TEAMS.md §7.1). Because it replaces the set rather than adding to
+// it, DEREGISTRATION is free: a module that is gone is simply absent from the
+// next pull, and nobody has to remember to take its command back.
 async function registerCommands(applicationId, targetGuildId) {
+  const dynamic = dynamicCommands.definitions()
   const rest = new REST({ version: '10' }).setToken(client.token)
   await rest.put(Routes.applicationGuildCommands(applicationId, targetGuildId), {
-    body: commands.all.map((c) => c.data),
+    body: [...commands.all.map((c) => c.data), ...dynamic],
   })
-  log.info('registered guild slash commands', { guildId: targetGuildId, count: commands.all.length })
+  log.info('registered guild slash commands', {
+    guildId: targetGuildId,
+    builtIn: commands.all.length,
+    fromApp: dynamic.length,
+  })
+}
+
+/**
+ * Re-pull the app's commands and re-register the set if it moved.
+ *
+ * Called on `ready` and again whenever the app nudges
+ * (`POST /internal/refresh-commands`). A no-op when nothing changed, so a nudge
+ * per module state change costs one cheap GET rather than a REST.put per
+ * install — and a disconnected bot does nothing at all, since there is no
+ * application to register against until it logs in.
+ */
+async function refreshCommands() {
+  const result = await dynamicCommands.pull()
+  if (!result.ok || !result.changed) return result
+  if (!client || !client.isReady()) return result
+  try {
+    await registerCommands(client.application.id, guildId)
+  } catch (err) {
+    // The PUT is all-or-nothing: a definition Discord rejects costs every
+    // command, the built-ins included. Loud, and never fatal to the process.
+    log.error('re-registering slash commands failed — the previous set is still live', {
+      message: err.message,
+    })
+  }
+  return result
 }
 
 async function stop() {
@@ -54,6 +89,11 @@ async function stop() {
 // failure here leaves the client connected but flags an error status.
 async function onReady() {
   try {
+    // Pull BEFORE the single PUT, so the app's commands are in the very first
+    // registration rather than appearing a beat later. The pull never throws —
+    // an unreachable app costs the module commands and nothing else, and the
+    // bot's own set registers exactly as it always did.
+    await dynamicCommands.pull()
     await registerCommands(client.application.id, guildId)
     await scheduler.start(client)
     tempRoleSweeper.start(client)
@@ -70,14 +110,19 @@ async function onReady() {
   }
 }
 
-// Route an interaction: role-menu handler first, then chat-input slash commands.
+// Route an interaction: role-menu handler first, then chat-input slash commands
+// — the bot's own, then the app's. Built-ins are consulted FIRST and the pull
+// already drops any module name that collides with one, so the two orderings
+// agree; checking here as well means a name that somehow reached Discord twice
+// still runs the bot's version rather than whichever registry answered first.
 async function onInteractionCreate(interaction) {
   if (await roleMenuHandler.handleInteraction(interaction)) return
   if (!interaction.isChatInputCommand()) return
   const command = commands.get(interaction.commandName)
-  if (!command) return
+  if (!command && !dynamicCommands.has(interaction.commandName)) return
   try {
-    await command.execute(interaction)
+    if (command) await command.execute(interaction)
+    else await dynamicCommands.execute(interaction)
   } catch (err) {
     log.error('command execution failed', { command: interaction.commandName, message: err.message })
     const payload = { content: 'Something went wrong running that command.', ephemeral: true }
@@ -146,4 +191,4 @@ function getConnection() {
   return { client, guildId }
 }
 
-module.exports = { start, stop, getStatus, getConnection }
+module.exports = { start, stop, getStatus, getConnection, refreshCommands }

bot/src/discord/dynamicCommands.js

@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+// Slash commands whose DEFINITION and HANDLER live in the website process
+// (TEAMS.md §7.1). The bot pulls the definitions, registers them alongside its
+// own, and executes one by deferring, asking the app, and editing the reply in.
+//
+// Everything Discord-specific is here and nothing else is: the app's dispatcher
+// resolves the actor, enforces access and produces a platform-neutral envelope,
+// and this file turns that envelope into an interaction reply. A module never
+// touches an interaction, which is what makes the registration API something a
+// second platform could implement.
+const { PermissionFlagsBits } = require('discord.js')
+
+const appInternal = require('../site/appInternalClient')
+const staticCommands = require('./commands')
+const createLogger = require('../utils/logger')
+
+const log = createLogger('dynamic-commands')
+
+// §7.1.1's four types, and the only four. The app rejects anything else at
+// registration; this map is the second half of that agreement.
+const OPTION_TYPE = { string: 3, integer: 4, boolean: 5, user: 6 }
+
+// The pulled set, and the app's module-state counter it came from. `null`
+// version means "never successfully pulled", which is distinct from 0 ("pulled
+// while the app had no modules loaded") — the first should retry, the second is
+// a true answer.
+let pulled = []
+let version = null
+
+/**
+ * Ask the app for the current definitions.
+ *
+ * **A failed pull KEEPS the previous set.** The app being briefly unreachable is
+ * not the same as it having no commands, and treating it as such would
+ * deregister every module command from Discord on a restart blip — then
+ * re-register them a minute later, with members watching commands appear and
+ * disappear. Nothing changes until the app actually answers.
+ *
+ * @returns {Promise<{ok: boolean, changed: boolean, count: number}>}
+ */
+async function pull() {
+  const res = await appInternal.fetchCommands()
+  if (!res.ok) {
+    log.warn('command pull failed — keeping the set already registered', {
+      error: res.error,
+      holding: pulled.length,
+    })
+    return { ok: false, changed: false, count: pulled.length }
+  }
+
+  const { version: pulledVersion, commands } = res.data || {}
+  const next = Array.isArray(commands) ? commands.filter(usable) : []
+  const changed = version === null || pulledVersion !== version || next.length !== pulled.length
+  pulled = next
+  version = typeof pulledVersion === 'number' ? pulledVersion : 0
+  return { ok: true, changed, count: pulled.length }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Drop a pulled definition the bot cannot honour.
+ *
+ * **The name collision the app cannot see.** The app validates a command against
+ * everything IT has registered; it does not know the bot's own static array
+ * exists. A module registering `ping` would produce two `ping` entries in one
+ * `REST.put`, which Discord rejects as a batch — taking down every command
+ * including the bot's own. The bot's built-ins win, because they are the ones a
+ * module cannot be asked to change.
+ */
+function usable(definition) {
+  if (!definition || typeof definition.name !== 'string') return false
+  if (staticCommands.get(definition.name)) {
+    log.warn('module slash command collides with a built-in and is ignored', {
+      command: definition.name,
+      owner: definition.owner,
+    })
+    return false
+  }
+  return true
+}
+
+/**
+ * The pulled definitions as Discord command data, for the whole-set PUT.
+ *
+ * `access: 'staff'` becomes a Discord-side permission default; `linked` cannot
+ * be expressed in Discord's permission model at all — there is no "has a website
+ * account" predicate — so it is simply not advertised and the app's dispatcher
+ * refuses it. That asymmetry is the reason §7.1 says access is enforced twice
+ * and that only the server half is the gate.
+ */
+function definitions() {
+  return pulled.map((c) => {
+    const data = {
+      name: c.name,
+      description: c.description,
+      options: (c.options || []).map((o) => ({
+        name: o.name,
+        description: o.description,
+        type: OPTION_TYPE[o.type],
+        required: Boolean(o.required),
+        ...(o.choices ? { choices: o.choices } : {}),
+      })),
+    }
+    if (c.access === 'staff') data.default_member_permissions = PermissionFlagsBits.ModerateMembers.toString()
+    return data
+  })
+}
+
+/** Is this a command the app owns? Asked before the static registry is consulted. */
+const has = (name) => pulled.some((c) => c.name === name)
+
+// Read the options the member actually supplied, by the names the definition
+// declared. A `user` option is passed on as the Discord user id and nothing else
+// — a handler receives platform ids, never a platform object.
+function collectOptions(interaction, definition) {
+  const out = {}
+  for (const option of definition.options || []) {
+    const supplied = interaction.options.get(option.name)
+    if (supplied === null || supplied === undefined) continue
+    out[option.name] = option.type === 'user' ? String(supplied.value) : supplied.value
+  }
+  return out
+}
+
+// What the caller sees when the app declined. The COPY lives here rather than in
+// the app on purpose: the app answers with a machine reason, and how a refusal is
+// phrased to a member is the platform's own voice.
+function refusal({ reason, access }) {
+  if (reason === 'forbidden' && access === 'linked') {
+    return 'Link your Discord account on the site to use this command.'
+  }
+  if (reason === 'forbidden') return 'You do not have access to that command.'
+  if (reason === 'unknown') return 'That command is no longer available.'
+  return 'Something went wrong running that command.'
+}
+
+// Envelope → interaction payload. A response with fields or a title is an embed;
+// a bare `text` is plain content, which reads better for a one-line answer.
+function render(envelope) {
+  const { text, title, fields, url } = envelope
+  if (!title && !fields) return { content: text || '​' }
+  const embed = {}
+  if (title) embed.title = title
+  if (text) embed.description = text
+  if (url) embed.url = url
+  if (fields) embed.fields = fields
+  return { embeds: [embed] }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Deliver the envelope at the privacy the HANDLER asked for, not the privacy the
+ * deferral guessed.
+ *
+ * When the two agree — the ordinary case — this is one `editReply`. When the
+ * handler wants a private answer to a publicly deferred command, the deferred
+ * reply is deleted and the answer arrives as an ephemeral follow-up: the
+ * interaction token stays valid, so this is a supported path rather than a
+ * trick, and the cost is a "thinking…" that appears and vanishes.
+ *
+ * There is no reverse case. A command deferred ephemerally is one whose answers
+ * are all about the caller's own account, and nothing it returns should become
+ * public because a handler forgot a flag.
+ */
+async function reply(interaction, envelope, deferredEphemeral) {
+  const payload = render(envelope)
+  if (!envelope.ephemeral || deferredEphemeral) {
+    await interaction.editReply(payload)
+    return
+  }
+  await interaction.deleteReply()
+  await interaction.followUp({ ...payload, ephemeral: true })
+}
+
+/**
+ * Defer, dispatch, edit.
+ *
+ * **The deferral comes first, always.** Discord gives three seconds to acknowledge
+ * an interaction; the app is given four to answer. Deferring before the dispatch
+ * is what keeps the website out of that critical path entirely — a wedged handler
+ * costs its own reply and never an "application did not respond".
+ *
+ * A failure at any point after the defer is an edit, not a reply: the interaction
+ * has already been acknowledged, and `reply()` on a deferred interaction throws.
+ */
+async function execute(interaction) {
+  const definition = pulled.find((c) => c.name === interaction.commandName)
+  if (!definition) return false
+
+  // **Ephemerality is fixed at the DEFERRAL, which happens before the answer
+  // exists.** That is Discord's rule, not a choice here, and it is the whole
+  // reason this needs care: the handler decides privacy per answer — a refusal
+  // is private, a guild summary is not — and by the time it says so the reply is
+  // already public or already not.
+  //
+  // So: defer for the common case (public, or private for a command that only
+  // ever speaks about the caller's own account), and if the envelope disagrees,
+  // reconcile below. Getting this wrong is not cosmetic — the live walk caught it
+  // posting "guild information is not shown to your account" into the channel,
+  // which announces a member's access level to everyone in it.
+  const ephemeral = definition.access === 'linked'
+  await interaction.deferReply({ ephemeral })
+
+  const res = await appInternal.dispatchCommand({
+    command: definition.name,
+    options: collectOptions(interaction, definition),
+    platformUserId: interaction.user.id,
+    guildId: interaction.guildId,
+  })
+
+  // A transport failure and a handler failure are the same sentence to the
+  // member and different lines in the log: one is the app being unreachable,
+  // the other is a module's code.
+  // A refusal is ALWAYS private, whatever the command's usual privacy: "you do
+  // not have access to that" is about one member and belongs to one member.
+  if (!res.ok) {
+    log.warn('command dispatch failed', { command: definition.name, error: res.error })
+    await reply(interaction, { text: refusal({ reason: 'error' }), ephemeral: true }, ephemeral)
+    return true
+  }
+  if (!res.data || !res.data.ok) {
+    await reply(interaction, { text: refusal(res.data || {}), ephemeral: true }, ephemeral)
+    return true
+  }
+
+  const envelope = res.data.response || {}
+  await reply(interaction, envelope, ephemeral)
+
+  // The private aside beside a public answer (§9 answer 5). Skipped when the
+  // reply was already private — the member would just be told the same thing
+  // twice, in the same place.
+  if (envelope.notice && !ephemeral && !envelope.ephemeral) {
+    await interaction.followUp({ content: envelope.notice, ephemeral: true })
+  }
+  return true
+}
+
+// Test-only: the pulled set is process-global, so a test that pulls has to be
+// able to hand the process back.
+function _reset() {
+  pulled = []
+  version = null
+}
+
+module.exports = { pull, definitions, has, execute, _reset }

bot/src/discord/teamNotify.js

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+// Team notifications posted into an operator-configured channel (TEAMS.md §7.2).
+//
+// **The channel comes from the app, not from guild_config.** `newsAnnounce` looks
+// its channel up here because there is exactly one #news; a Team's destination is
+// per-Team configuration living in `team_integration_config`, and a bot that
+// resolved it would need a second copy of that table and a second place for it to
+// drift. The app sends the id it already decided on.
+//
+// **Everything this file knows about a Team it was told.** No lookups, no
+// membership checks, no access decisions: whether this content may reach this
+// channel was settled on the site, where the acknowledgement that gates it lives.
+// The bot is the transport, exactly as it is for slash commands.
+const { EmbedBuilder } = require('discord.js')
+
+const brand = require('../brand')
+const createLogger = require('../utils/logger')
+
+const log = createLogger('team-notify')
+
+// Discord's own limits. Truncating here rather than trusting the app is not
+// distrust — an embed that exceeds them is rejected wholesale, and a message
+// silently not appearing is the worst failure mode this path has.
+const TITLE_MAX = 256
+const DESCRIPTION_MAX = 4096
+
+const clamp = (value, max) => {
+  const text = String(value || '').trim()
+  if (!text) return null
+  return text.length > max ? `${text.slice(0, max - 1)}…` : text
+}
+
+// What each stream is called in a channel. The app composes the BODY; this is
+// only the label above it, and it is here because it is Discord presentation —
+// the same reason the embed colour is.
+const HEADINGS = {
+  'team.member.joined': 'New member',
+  'team.leadership.changed': 'Leadership change',
+  'team.forum.post': 'New forum post',
+  'team.announcement': 'Announcement',
+}
+
+async function postTeamNotification(client, { channelId, stream, teamName, teamUrl, title, body, url }) {
+  if (!channelId) throw new Error('No channel id supplied.')
+
+  const channel = await client.channels.fetch(channelId).catch(() => null)
+  if (!channel || !channel.isTextBased()) {
+    throw new Error('Configured channel is missing, not text-based, or not visible to the bot.')
+  }
+
+  const heading = HEADINGS[stream] || 'Team update'
+  const name = clamp(teamName, 120) || 'A team'
+
+  const embed = new EmbedBuilder()
+    .setColor(brand.accentInt)
+    // The Team is the AUTHOR line and the event is the title, not the other way
+    // round: a channel carrying one Team's events would otherwise repeat its name
+    // as every heading, and a channel carrying several needs the name to be the
+    // thing the eye lands on first.
+    .setAuthor(teamUrl ? { name, url: teamUrl } : { name })
+    .setTitle(clamp(title, TITLE_MAX) || heading)
+
+  if (url) embed.setURL(url)
+
+  // Both a title and a body means a forum post: the heading has to go somewhere
+  // or "New forum post" and "Announcement" become indistinguishable once the
+  // thread title takes the title slot.
+  //
+  // **Clamped AFTER the heading is prepended, not before.** Clamping the body and
+  // then adding a prefix produces a description one heading longer than the limit,
+  // which discord.js rejects outright — so an over-long post would not arrive at
+  // all rather than arriving truncated. The prefix is part of what has to fit.
+  const composed = title && body ? `**${heading}**\n${String(body)}` : body
+  const description = clamp(composed, DESCRIPTION_MAX)
+  if (description) embed.setDescription(description)
+
+  await channel.send({ embeds: [embed] })
+  log.info('team notification posted', { stream, channelId, team: name })
+}
+
+module.exports = { postTeamNotification, HEADINGS, clamp, TITLE_MAX, DESCRIPTION_MAX }

bot/src/discord/teamVoice.js

@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+// Per-Team voice channels (TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9).
+//
+// **The site decides; this file compares and applies.** Every judgement — which
+// Teams qualify, who may enter, what the channel is called — was made on the site
+// and arrives in the request. What cannot be made there is the DIFF: which of
+// those people already hold the role, whether the channel still exists, whether
+// the category was deleted last week. That is live guild state, only this process
+// can see it, and shipping it to the site to be compared and shipped back would
+// be a copy of the guild in a database that cannot watch it change.
+//
+// So the contract is "make it look like this", not "do these calls".
+//
+// **Access is a per-Team ROLE.** §7.3 designed per-member permission overwrites
+// with a role only above ~90 members; the org lead settled on roles always
+// (2026-08-18). The channel therefore carries exactly three kinds of overwrite —
+// @everyone denied, the Team's role allowed, and each operator-designated staff
+// role allowed — and membership is the role's member list rather than a hundred
+// entries on the channel.
+const { ChannelType, PermissionFlagsBits } = require('discord.js')
+
+const createLogger = require('../utils/logger')
+
+const log = createLogger('team-voice')
+
+// The category every Team channel is created under. Created on the first pass
+// that needs one; the site stores the id and sends it back next time.
+const CATEGORY_NAME = 'Teams'
+
+// discord.js REST error codes for "the thing you are addressing is already gone".
+// A teardown that finds its target missing has SUCCEEDED — the desired end state
+// holds — and the same is true of a sync that finds a channel a human deleted,
+// which simply becomes a create.
+const UNKNOWN_CHANNEL = 10003
+const UNKNOWN_ROLE = 10011
+
+const isMissing = (err) => err && (err.code === UNKNOWN_CHANNEL || err.code === UNKNOWN_ROLE)
+
+// What a Team member may do in their channel, and what @everyone may not. Both
+// halves are needed: denying ViewChannel alone still leaves Connect resolvable
+// for anyone who has the id, and allowing ViewChannel alone shows a channel
+// nobody can enter.
+const ACCESS_BITS = [PermissionFlagsBits.ViewChannel, PermissionFlagsBits.Connect]
+
+/**
+ * Can this bot do §7.3's job in this guild?
+ *
+ * Asked before an operator may switch voice on, and again at the top of every
+ * pass. The site has no way to know: the operator invites the bot by hand, there
+ * is no invite URL with a permission integer anywhere in this project, and an
+ * unticked box means every call fails with nothing to point at.
+ *
+ * `bot_role_position` is reported because it is the second, quieter failure:
+ * ManageRoles lets the bot create a role, but it can only GRANT roles below its
+ * own highest one. A bot sitting at the bottom of the role list creates roles it
+ * then cannot hand to anybody — which looks exactly like a channel nobody can
+ * enter, with no error anywhere.
+ */
+async function preflight(client, guildId) {
+  const guild = await client.guilds.fetch(guildId)
+  const me = guild.members.me || (await guild.members.fetchMe())
+  return {
+    connected: true,
+    guild_id: guild.id,
+    can_manage_channels: me.permissions.has(PermissionFlagsBits.ManageChannels),
+    can_manage_roles: me.permissions.has(PermissionFlagsBits.ManageRoles),
+    // The guild's whole role list, not just the ones this feature made. The
+    // 250-role cap is guild-wide and shared with everything the operator created
+    // themselves, so counting ours would promise headroom that is not there.
+    role_count: guild.roles.cache.size,
+    bot_role_position: me.roles.highest.position,
+  }
+}
+
+/** The `Teams` category, reusing the one we were given when it is still there. */
+async function ensureCategory(guild, categoryId) {
+  if (categoryId) {
+    const existing = await guild.channels.fetch(categoryId).catch(() => null)
+    if (existing && existing.type === ChannelType.GuildCategory) return existing
+    log.warn('the configured Teams category is gone; making another', { categoryId })
+  }
+  const created = await guild.channels.create({
+    name: CATEGORY_NAME,
+    type: ChannelType.GuildCategory,
+    reason: 'Team voice channels',
+  })
+  log.info('created the Teams category', { categoryId: created.id })
+  return created
+}
+
+/**
+ * The Team's own role.
+ *
+ * A rename is applied but never allowed to fail the pass: a Team's name is the
+ * least important thing here and Discord rate-limits name edits hard, so losing
+ * one is worth strictly less than losing the access change in the same request.
+ */
+async function ensureRole(guild, roleId, name) {
+  let role = roleId ? await guild.roles.fetch(roleId).catch(() => null) : null
+  let created = false
+  if (!role) {
+    role = await guild.roles.create({
+      name,
+      // Not mentionable and not hoisted: this role exists to open a door, and a
+      // Team with two hundred members should not become a way to ping them all or
+      // a second copy of the member list down the sidebar.
+      mentionable: false,
+      hoist: false,
+      reason: 'Team voice access',
+    })
+    created = true
+    log.info('created a team role', { roleId: role.id, name })
+  } else if (role.name !== name) {
+    await role.setName(name, 'Team renamed').catch((err) => {
+      log.warn('could not rename the team role', { roleId: role.id, message: err.message })
+    })
+  }
+  return { role, created }
+}
+
+/** The overwrites a Team channel carries, in the order Discord takes them. */
+function overwritesFor(guild, role, staffRoleIds) {
+  const overwrites = [
+    { id: guild.roles.everyone.id, deny: ACCESS_BITS },
+    { id: role.id, allow: ACCESS_BITS },
+  ]
+  for (const staffId of staffRoleIds) {
+    // A staff role the operator has since deleted would make Discord reject the
+    // WHOLE set, taking the Team's own grant down with it. Filtered here rather
+    // than validated on the site, which cannot see the guild's role list.
+    if (!guild.roles.cache.has(staffId)) {
+      log.warn('a configured staff role is not in this guild; skipping it', { roleId: staffId })
+      continue
+    }
+    overwrites.push({ id: staffId, allow: ACCESS_BITS })
+  }
+  return overwrites
+}
+
+async function ensureChannel(guild, channelId, { name, category, role, staffRoleIds }) {
+  const overwrites = overwritesFor(guild, role, staffRoleIds)
+  let channel = channelId ? await guild.channels.fetch(channelId).catch(() => null) : null
+
+  if (channel && channel.type !== ChannelType.GuildVoice) {
+    // Somebody pointed us at, or converted this into, something that is not a
+    // voice channel. Not ours to repurpose — make the right one and leave theirs.
+    log.warn('the stored channel is not a voice channel; making a new one', { channelId })
+    channel = null
+  }
+
+  if (!channel) {
+    const created = await guild.channels.create({
+      name,
+      type: ChannelType.GuildVoice,
+      parent: category.id,
+      permissionOverwrites: overwrites,
+      reason: 'Team voice channel',
+    })
+    log.info('created a team voice channel', { channelId: created.id, name })
+    return { channel: created, created: true }
+  }
+
+  // Overwrites are re-set on every pass rather than diffed: the set is three or
+  // four entries, `set` is one API call, and re-asserting it is what repairs a
+  // channel somebody edited by hand.
+  await channel.permissionOverwrites.set(overwrites, 'Team voice access')
+  if (channel.parentId !== category.id) {
+    await channel.setParent(category.id, { lockPermissions: false, reason: 'Team voice channel' })
+  }
+  if (channel.name !== name) {
+    await channel.setName(name, 'Team renamed').catch((err) => {
+      log.warn('could not rename the team voice channel', { channelId: channel.id, message: err.message })
+    })
+  }
+  return { channel, created: false }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Bring the role's member list to the site's list, up to `maxOps` changes.
+ *
+ * **Bounded, and the remainder is reported rather than dropped.** Each grant is
+ * its own API call under its own rate limit, so an unbounded first pass on a
+ * large guild is a request that outlives its own timeout — and a timeout is the
+ * one outcome that leaves the site not knowing what was applied. The site asks
+ * again until `pending` reaches zero.
+ *
+ * **A member the site names who is not in this guild is skipped silently.** They
+ * linked their Discord account to the site and never joined the guild, which is
+ * an ordinary state (§2.6 hop 3 without hop 4) and not something an operator
+ * needs to see a hundred of.
+ */
+async function syncRoleMembers(guild, role, memberIds, maxOps) {
+  // One fetch of the whole member list, so `role.members` and the "are they even
+  // here" check both read from a cache that is actually populated. discord.js
+  // keeps it current from gateway events afterwards; without the fetch, a bot
+  // that has been up for five minutes knows only the members who spoke.
+  await guild.members.fetch()
+
+  const desired = new Set(memberIds.map(String))
+  const current = new Set(role.members.map((member) => member.id))
+
+  const toAdd = [...desired].filter((id) => !current.has(id) && guild.members.cache.has(id))
+  const toRemove = [...current].filter((id) => !desired.has(id))
+
+  let ops = 0
+  let added = 0
+  let removed = 0
+
+  for (const id of toAdd) {
+    if (ops >= maxOps) break
+    const member = guild.members.cache.get(id)
+    try {
+      // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+      await member.roles.add(role, 'Team member')
+      added += 1
+    } catch (err) {
+      // One member the bot cannot touch — almost always the role hierarchy, when
+      // the member outranks the bot — must not cost the other forty-nine.
+      log.warn('could not grant the team role', { userId: id, roleId: role.id, message: err.message })
+    }
+    ops += 1
+  }
+
+  for (const id of toRemove) {
+    if (ops >= maxOps) break
+    const member = guild.members.cache.get(id)
+    if (!member) continue
+    try {
+      // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+      await member.roles.remove(role, 'No longer a team member')
+      removed += 1
+    } catch (err) {
+      log.warn('could not revoke the team role', { userId: id, roleId: role.id, message: err.message })
+    }
+    ops += 1
+  }
+
+  return { added, removed, pending: Math.max(0, toAdd.length + toRemove.length - ops) }
+}
+
+/** One Team, reconciled. */
+async function syncTeamVoice(client, guildId, {
+  teamId, name, categoryId, channelId, roleId, staffRoleIds = [], memberIds = [], maxMemberOps = 50,
+}) {
+  const guild = await client.guilds.fetch(guildId)
+  const category = await ensureCategory(guild, categoryId)
+  const { role, created: roleCreated } = await ensureRole(guild, roleId, name)
+  const { channel, created: channelCreated } = await ensureChannel(guild, channelId, {
+    name, category, role, staffRoleIds,
+  })
+  const members = await syncRoleMembers(guild, role, memberIds, maxMemberOps)
+
+  log.info('team voice reconciled', {
+    teamId, name, channelId: channel.id, roleId: role.id, ...members,
+  })
+
+  return {
+    category_id: category.id,
+    channel_id: channel.id,
+    role_id: role.id,
+    created: { channel: channelCreated, role: roleCreated },
+    members,
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Remove a Team's channel and role.
+ *
+ * Both, in one call, because they are one lifecycle: deleting the channel and
+ * leaving the role would leave every member wearing a badge for a place that no
+ * longer exists. Either being already gone is success.
+ */
+async function removeTeamVoice(client, guildId, { channelId, roleId }) {
+  const guild = await client.guilds.fetch(guildId)
+  const result = { channel_deleted: false, role_deleted: false }
+
+  if (channelId) {
+    const channel = await guild.channels.fetch(channelId).catch(() => null)
+    if (channel) {
+      try {
+        await channel.delete('Team no longer qualifies for a voice channel')
+        result.channel_deleted = true
+      } catch (err) {
+        if (!isMissing(err)) throw err
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  if (roleId) {
+    const role = await guild.roles.fetch(roleId).catch(() => null)
+    if (role) {
+      try {
+        await role.delete('Team no longer qualifies for a voice channel')
+        result.role_deleted = true
+      } catch (err) {
+        if (!isMissing(err)) throw err
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  log.info('team voice removed', { channelId, roleId, ...result })
+  return result
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  CATEGORY_NAME,
+  ACCESS_BITS,
+  preflight,
+  ensureCategory,
+  ensureRole,
+  ensureChannel,
+  overwritesFor,
+  syncRoleMembers,
+  syncTeamVoice,
+  removeTeamVoice,
+}

bot/src/internal/internal.controller.js

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 const discordManager = require('../discord/discordManager')
 const newsAnnounce = require('../discord/newsAnnounce')
+const teamNotify = require('../discord/teamNotify')
+const teamVoice = require('../discord/teamVoice')
 const modLog = require('../discord/modLog')
 const createLogger = require('../utils/logger')
 
@@ -99,4 +101,142 @@ async function reverseModAction(req, res) {
   }
 }
 
-module.exports = { setConfig, getStatus: getStatusHandler, announce, reverseModAction }
+// POST /internal/refresh-commands — the app's nudge that its registered
+// slash-command set has moved (TEAMS.md §7.1). No body: the bot re-pulls
+// `/internal/commands` and re-registers only if the set actually changed, so the
+// nudge stays a cheap thing the app can send on every module state change.
+//
+// Deliberately its OWN endpoint rather than riding on /internal/config, which
+// carries the decrypted bot token: saying "commands changed" should not require
+// the app to read a secret out of the database.
+//
+// Answers 200 even when disconnected — there is no application to register
+// against until the bot logs in, and `ready` pulls again anyway. A 5xx here
+// would make an ordinary module install look like a failure in the admin panel.
+async function refreshCommands(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const result = await discordManager.refreshCommands()
+    return res.json({ ok: true, ...result })
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.error('refresh-commands failed', { message: err.message })
+    return res.json({ ok: false, error: err.message })
+  }
+}
+
+// POST /internal/team-notify — a Team notification the site has already decided
+// belongs in a channel (TEAMS.md §7.2). Body: { channel_id, stream, team_name,
+// team_url, title, body, url }.
+//
+// **The site chose the channel and the site checked the access.** Whether
+// members-only forum text may reach this channel is an acknowledgement recorded
+// against team_integration_config, and re-deciding it here would mean the bot
+// holding a copy of a policy it cannot see the inputs to.
+//
+// 503 when disconnected and 400 for a channel the bot cannot post to, matching
+// /internal/announce — the caller is one-shot and best-effort and only logs the
+// difference, but an operator debugging a silent channel needs the two to read
+// differently in the bot's log.
+async function teamNotifyHandler(req, res) {
+  const connection = discordManager.getConnection()
+  if (!connection) return res.status(503).json({ message: 'Bot is not connected' })
+
+  const { channel_id: channelId, stream, team_name: teamName, team_url: teamUrl, title, body, url } = req.body || {}
+  if (!channelId || !stream) {
+    return res.status(400).json({ message: 'channel_id and stream are required' })
+  }
+
+  try {
+    await teamNotify.postTeamNotification(connection.client, { channelId, stream, teamName, teamUrl, title, body, url })
+    return res.json({ posted: true })
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.warn('team-notify failed', { message: err.message, stream, channelId })
+    return res.status(400).json({ message: err.message })
+  }
+}
+
+// ── Voice channels (TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9) ────────────────────────────────
+
+// GET /internal/team-voice/preflight — can this bot do the job at all?
+//
+// Its own endpoint, and the app asks it BEFORE letting an operator switch voice
+// on. §7.3 assumed the bot could manage channels and roles; nothing in this
+// project has ever checked, because the operator invites the bot by hand and
+// there is no invite URL with a permission integer anywhere in the tree. Without
+// this the first symptom of an unticked box is every Team recording its own
+// identical error, which reads like forty problems instead of one.
+async function voicePreflight(req, res) {
+  const connection = discordManager.getConnection()
+  if (!connection) return res.status(503).json({ connected: false, message: 'Bot is not connected' })
+  try {
+    return res.json(await teamVoice.preflight(connection.client, connection.guildId))
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.warn('voice preflight failed', { message: err.message })
+    return res.status(400).json({ connected: true, message: err.message })
+  }
+}
+
+// POST /internal/team-voice/sync — make one Team's channel, role and role
+// membership match what the site sent.
+//
+// The site sends DESIRED STATE and this works out the calls, which is the
+// opposite of the split every other endpoint here uses. The decisions are all
+// still the site's; what is here is the comparison against live guild state,
+// which only this process can see.
+async function voiceSync(req, res) {
+  const connection = discordManager.getConnection()
+  if (!connection) return res.status(503).json({ message: 'Bot is not connected' })
+
+  const {
+    team_id: teamId, name, category_id: categoryId, channel_id: channelId, role_id: roleId,
+    staff_role_ids: staffRoleIds, member_ids: memberIds, max_member_ops: maxMemberOps,
+  } = req.body || {}
+
+  if (!name) return res.status(400).json({ message: 'name is required' })
+
+  try {
+    const result = await teamVoice.syncTeamVoice(connection.client, connection.guildId, {
+      teamId,
+      name,
+      categoryId: categoryId || null,
+      channelId: channelId || null,
+      roleId: roleId || null,
+      staffRoleIds: Array.isArray(staffRoleIds) ? staffRoleIds.map(String) : [],
+      memberIds: Array.isArray(memberIds) ? memberIds.map(String) : [],
+      maxMemberOps: Number(maxMemberOps) > 0 ? Number(maxMemberOps) : 50,
+    })
+    return res.json(result)
+  } catch (err) {
+    // 400 rather than 500, matching /internal/announce: from the app's side this
+    // is "Discord refused", which is a condition it records against the Team and
+    // retries next pass — not a bug in this process.
+    log.warn('voice sync failed', { message: err.message, teamId, name })
+    return res.status(400).json({ message: err.message })
+  }
+}
+
+// POST /internal/team-voice/remove — the grace window expired, or an admin said so.
+async function voiceRemove(req, res) {
+  const connection = discordManager.getConnection()
+  if (!connection) return res.status(503).json({ message: 'Bot is not connected' })
+
+  const { channel_id: channelId, role_id: roleId } = req.body || {}
+  try {
+    const result = await teamVoice.removeTeamVoice(connection.client, connection.guildId, { channelId, roleId })
+    return res.json(result)
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.warn('voice remove failed', { message: err.message, channelId, roleId })
+    return res.status(400).json({ message: err.message })
+  }
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  setConfig,
+  getStatus: getStatusHandler,
+  announce,
+  reverseModAction,
+  refreshCommands,
+  teamNotify: teamNotifyHandler,
+  voicePreflight,
+  voiceSync,
+  voiceRemove,
+}

bot/src/internal/internal.routes.js

@@ -11,5 +11,10 @@ router.post('/config', ctrl.setConfig)
 router.get('/status', ctrl.getStatus)
 router.post('/announce', ctrl.announce)
 router.post('/mod-reverse', ctrl.reverseModAction)
+router.post('/refresh-commands', ctrl.refreshCommands)
+router.post('/team-notify', ctrl.teamNotify)
+router.get('/team-voice/preflight', ctrl.voicePreflight)
+router.post('/team-voice/sync', ctrl.voiceSync)
+router.post('/team-voice/remove', ctrl.voiceRemove)
 
 module.exports = router

bot/src/site/appInternalClient.js

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+// Shared-secret client for the APP's internal listener (port 3001) — the
+// bot→app direction of the channel `botInternalClient.js` runs app→bot.
+//
+// Two callers, both slash-command plumbing (TEAMS.md §7.1): pull the registered
+// command definitions, and dispatch one that a member has just run. Distinct
+// from siteApiClient.js, which reads the site's PUBLIC API with no secret at all.
+//
+// **The base URL is derived from `SITE_INTERNAL_URL`'s origin, not configured
+// separately.** That variable already points at the app's internal listener —
+// `http://app:3001/internal/bot-config` — and adding a second variable naming the
+// same host would be one more thing an operator can get half-right. Deriving it
+// means every existing deployment gains these endpoints with no compose change.
+const createLogger = require('../utils/logger')
+
+const log = createLogger('app-internal')
+
+const KEY = process.env.BOT_INTERNAL_KEY || ''
+
+// §7.1's budget, and the same 4s `botInternalClient` uses in the other
+// direction. The app bounds its own handlers UNDER this (3s), so a timeout here
+// normally means the app itself is unreachable rather than a module being slow.
+const TIMEOUT_MS = 4000
+
+function baseUrl() {
+  const configured = process.env.SITE_INTERNAL_URL
+  if (!configured) return null
+  try {
+    return new URL(configured).origin
+  } catch {
+    log.error('SITE_INTERNAL_URL is not a URL — slash-command registration is off', { configured })
+    return null
+  }
+}
+
+async function call(path, { method = 'GET', body } = {}) {
+  const base = baseUrl()
+  if (!base || !KEY) return { ok: false, error: 'SITE_INTERNAL_URL or BOT_INTERNAL_KEY not set' }
+  const controller = new AbortController()
+  const timeout = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), TIMEOUT_MS)
+  try {
+    const res = await fetch(`${base}${path}`, {
+      method,
+      headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Internal-Key': KEY },
+      body: body ? JSON.stringify(body) : undefined,
+      signal: controller.signal,
+    })
+    if (!res.ok) return { ok: false, status: res.status, error: `app responded ${res.status}` }
+    return { ok: true, status: res.status, data: await res.json() }
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.warn('app internal call failed', { path, message: err.message })
+    return { ok: false, status: 0, error: err.message }
+  } finally {
+    clearTimeout(timeout)
+  }
+}
+
+/** The registered slash-command definitions, plus the version they belong to. */
+function fetchCommands() {
+  return call('/internal/commands')
+}
+
+/**
+ * Run one command in the app and get the response envelope back.
+ *
+ * The bot has already deferred by the time this is called, so the only deadline
+ * that matters is Discord's 15-minute follow-up window — TIMEOUT_MS is about not
+ * holding an interaction open on a wedged app, not about the 3-second ack.
+ */
+function dispatchCommand({ command, options, platformUserId, guildId }) {
+  return call('/internal/commands/dispatch', {
+    method: 'POST',
+    body: { command, options, platform: 'discord', platformUserId, guildId },
+  })
+}
+
+module.exports = { fetchCommands, dispatchCommand }

bot/test/appInternalClient.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+// The bot→app internal client (TEAMS.md §7.1).
+//
+// One property carries this file: the base URL is DERIVED from
+// `SITE_INTERNAL_URL`, which already names the app's internal listener with a
+// path on the end. That derivation is the reason every existing deployment gains
+// slash commands with no compose change, and it is exactly the kind of string
+// handling that breaks silently — a wrong base means "the app is down" forever,
+// with nothing in the logs but a fetch error.
+
+const { test, beforeEach, afterEach } = require('node:test')
+const assert = require('node:assert/strict')
+
+const env = { ...process.env }
+const realFetch = global.fetch
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  process.env.SITE_INTERNAL_URL = 'http://app:3001/internal/bot-config'
+  process.env.BOT_INTERNAL_KEY = 'shh'
+  delete require.cache[require.resolve('../src/site/appInternalClient')]
+})
+
+afterEach(() => {
+  process.env = { ...env }
+  global.fetch = realFetch
+})
+
+/** Load the client fresh and record the single fetch it makes. */
+function withFetch(response) {
+  const seen = {}
+  global.fetch = async (url, init) => {
+    seen.url = url
+    seen.init = init
+    return response
+  }
+  // eslint-disable-next-line global-require
+  return { client: require('../src/site/appInternalClient'), seen }
+}
+
+const ok = (body) => ({ ok: true, status: 200, json: async () => body })
+
+test('the commands URL is the internal listener’s origin, not its bot-config path', async () => {
+  const { client, seen } = withFetch(ok({ version: 3, commands: [] }))
+  const res = await client.fetchCommands()
+  assert.equal(seen.url, 'http://app:3001/internal/commands')
+  assert.equal(seen.init.headers['X-Internal-Key'], 'shh')
+  assert.deepEqual(res.data, { version: 3, commands: [] })
+})
+
+test('a dispatch names the platform, so the app never has to guess', async () => {
+  const { client, seen } = withFetch(ok({ ok: true, response: {} }))
+  await client.dispatchCommand({ command: 'guild', options: { name: 'KOC' }, platformUserId: '5', guildId: '9' })
+  assert.equal(seen.url, 'http://app:3001/internal/commands/dispatch')
+  assert.deepEqual(JSON.parse(seen.init.body), {
+    command: 'guild', options: { name: 'KOC' }, platform: 'discord', platformUserId: '5', guildId: '9',
+  })
+})
+
+// A bot with no internal URL configured is an ordinary deployment state (the
+// warning already exists in bootstrap.js); it must not become an exception on
+// every `ready`.
+test('an unconfigured or unparseable SITE_INTERNAL_URL is a refusal, not a throw', async () => {
+  delete process.env.SITE_INTERNAL_URL
+  const { client } = withFetch(ok({}))
+  assert.equal((await client.fetchCommands()).ok, false)
+
+  delete require.cache[require.resolve('../src/site/appInternalClient')]
+  process.env.SITE_INTERNAL_URL = 'not a url'
+  // eslint-disable-next-line global-require
+  assert.equal((await require('../src/site/appInternalClient').fetchCommands()).ok, false)
+})
+
+test('a non-2xx carries its status so the caller can tell "down" from "rejected"', async () => {
+  const { client } = withFetch({ ok: false, status: 401, json: async () => ({}) })
+  const res = await client.fetchCommands()
+  assert.equal(res.ok, false)
+  assert.equal(res.status, 401)
+})

bot/test/dynamicCommands.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
+// ── The bot's half of module slash commands (TEAMS.md §7.1) ────────────────
+//
+// The first tests in this package, and they exist for a specific reason: phases
+// 8 and 9 put more of the Discord integration in this process, and the failure
+// modes here are ones no unit test in `server/` can see — a whole-set PUT that
+// one bad entry poisons, a deferral that has to happen before anything slow, and
+// a reply that must be EDITED rather than sent once the interaction is deferred.
+//
+// Nothing here talks to Discord. `interaction` is a fake that records what was
+// called on it, which is the whole of what this file is asserting about.
+
+const { test, beforeEach } = require('node:test')
+const assert = require('node:assert/strict')
+
+const dynamic = require('../src/discord/dynamicCommands')
+const appInternal = require('../src/site/appInternalClient')
+const staticCommands = require('../src/discord/commands')
+
+const originals = {
+  fetchCommands: appInternal.fetchCommands,
+  dispatchCommand: appInternal.dispatchCommand,
+  get: staticCommands.get,
+}
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  dynamic._reset()
+  Object.assign(appInternal, originals)
+  staticCommands.get = originals.get
+})
+
+const definition = (over = {}) => ({
+  name: 'guild',
+  description: 'Show a guild',
+  owner: 'uo',
+  access: 'everyone',
+  options: [{ name: 'name', type: 'string', description: 'Guild name', required: false }],
+  ...over,
+})
+
+const answers = (commands, version = 1) => {
+  appInternal.fetchCommands = async () => ({ ok: true, data: { version, commands } })
+}
+
+function fakeInteraction({ commandName = 'guild', options = {}, userId = '555' } = {}) {
+  const calls = []
+  return {
+    calls,
+    commandName,
+    guildId: '999',
+    user: { id: userId },
+    options: {
+      get: (name) => (name in options ? { value: options[name] } : null),
+    },
+    deferReply: async (payload) => calls.push(['defer', payload]),
+    editReply: async (payload) => calls.push(['edit', payload]),
+    deleteReply: async () => calls.push(['delete']),
+    followUp: async (payload) => calls.push(['followUp', payload]),
+  }
+}
+
+// ── Pulling ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('a pull reports whether the set moved, so a nudge is cheap', async () => {
+  answers([definition()], 7)
+  assert.deepEqual(await dynamic.pull(), { ok: true, changed: true, count: 1 })
+  // Same version, same size: nothing to re-register, and re-registering anyway
+  // would mean a REST.put per module state change instead of per real change.
+  assert.deepEqual(await dynamic.pull(), { ok: true, changed: false, count: 1 })
+  answers([definition()], 8)
+  assert.equal((await dynamic.pull()).changed, true)
+})
+
+// Otherwise a restart blip would deregister every module command from Discord
+// and re-register it a minute later, with members watching it happen.
+test('a failed pull keeps the set already registered', async () => {
+  answers([definition()])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  appInternal.fetchCommands = async () => ({ ok: false, error: 'ECONNREFUSED' })
+  assert.deepEqual(await dynamic.pull(), { ok: false, changed: false, count: 1 })
+  assert.equal(dynamic.definitions().length, 1)
+})
+
+// The collision the app cannot see: it validates against what IT registered and
+// does not know the bot's own array exists. Two entries of one name in a single
+// PUT is rejected as a batch, taking the built-ins down with it.
+test('a module command that collides with a built-in is dropped, not registered', async () => {
+  staticCommands.get = (name) => (name === 'ping' ? { data: { name: 'ping' } } : undefined)
+  answers([definition({ name: 'ping' }), definition()])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  assert.deepEqual(dynamic.definitions().map((d) => d.name), ['guild'])
+  assert.equal(dynamic.has('ping'), false)
+})
+
+test('definitions carry Discord’s numeric option types, not the contract’s names', async () => {
+  answers([definition({
+    options: [
+      { name: 'who', type: 'user', description: 'A member', required: true },
+      { name: 'n', type: 'integer', description: 'How many', choices: [{ name: 'one', value: 1 }] },
+    ],
+  })])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  const [data] = dynamic.definitions()
+  assert.deepEqual(data.options.map((o) => o.type), [6, 4])
+  assert.deepEqual(data.options[1].choices, [{ name: 'one', value: 1 }])
+  assert.equal(data.default_member_permissions, undefined)
+})
+
+// `linked` has no Discord equivalent — there is no "has a website account"
+// predicate — so only `staff` maps, and the app re-checks both regardless.
+test('only access: staff becomes a Discord permission default', async () => {
+  answers([definition({ access: 'staff' }), definition({ name: 'other', access: 'linked' })])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  const [staff, linked] = dynamic.definitions()
+  assert.equal(typeof staff.default_member_permissions, 'string')
+  assert.equal(linked.default_member_permissions, undefined)
+})
+
+// ── Executing ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('the deferral happens before the dispatch, always', async () => {
+  answers([definition()])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  let deferredFirst = false
+  const interaction = fakeInteraction()
+  appInternal.dispatchCommand = async () => {
+    deferredFirst = interaction.calls.length === 1 && interaction.calls[0][0] === 'defer'
+    return { ok: true, data: { ok: true, response: { text: 'hi' } } }
+  }
+  await dynamic.execute(interaction)
+  assert.ok(deferredFirst, 'the website is never in Discord’s 3-second ack path')
+  assert.deepEqual(interaction.calls.at(-1), ['edit', { content: 'hi' }])
+})
+
+test('the options the member supplied are passed by name, as plain values', async () => {
+  answers([definition({
+    options: [
+      { name: 'name', type: 'string', description: 'd' },
+      { name: 'who', type: 'user', description: 'd' },
+      { name: 'missing', type: 'string', description: 'd' },
+    ],
+  })])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  let sent = null
+  appInternal.dispatchCommand = async (body) => {
+    sent = body
+    return { ok: true, data: { ok: true, response: {} } }
+  }
+  await dynamic.execute(fakeInteraction({ options: { name: 'KOC', who: '42' } }))
+  assert.deepEqual(sent.options, { name: 'KOC', who: '42' })
+  assert.equal(sent.platformUserId, '555')
+  assert.equal(sent.guildId, '999')
+})
+
+test('a title or fields render as an embed; a bare text does not', async () => {
+  answers([definition()])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  appInternal.dispatchCommand = async () => ({
+    ok: true,
+    data: { ok: true, response: { title: 'Knights', text: 'Alliance: Accord', fields: [{ name: 'Members', value: '12' }], url: 'https://site.test/uo/guilds/7' } },
+  })
+  const interaction = fakeInteraction()
+  await dynamic.execute(interaction)
+  const [, payload] = interaction.calls.at(-1)
+  assert.equal(payload.embeds[0].title, 'Knights')
+  assert.equal(payload.embeds[0].description, 'Alliance: Accord')
+  assert.equal(payload.embeds[0].url, 'https://site.test/uo/guilds/7')
+})
+
+// §9 answer 5: the public projection, plus a private nudge to link. One reply
+// cannot be both, so the aside is a follow-up — which is the bot's decision to
+// make, not the handler's.
+test('a notice becomes an ephemeral follow-up beside a public answer', async () => {
+  answers([definition()])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  appInternal.dispatchCommand = async () => ({
+    ok: true,
+    data: { ok: true, response: { text: 'public', notice: 'Link your account' } },
+  })
+  const interaction = fakeInteraction()
+  await dynamic.execute(interaction)
+  assert.deepEqual(interaction.calls.at(-1), ['followUp', { content: 'Link your account', ephemeral: true }])
+})
+
+test('a notice is not repeated when the answer was already private', async () => {
+  answers([definition({ access: 'linked' })])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  appInternal.dispatchCommand = async () => ({
+    ok: true,
+    data: { ok: true, response: { text: 'private', notice: 'Link your account' } },
+  })
+  const interaction = fakeInteraction()
+  await dynamic.execute(interaction)
+  assert.deepEqual(interaction.calls[0], ['defer', { ephemeral: true }])
+  assert.equal(interaction.calls.some(([kind]) => kind === 'followUp'), false)
+})
+
+// Every failure path EDITS. Replying to a deferred interaction throws, so a
+// refusal that used reply() would turn a clean "no" into an unhandled error.
+// Ephemerality is fixed at the DEFERRAL, which happens before the handler has
+// said anything — so honouring a per-answer flag needs the deferred reply
+// withdrawn. The live walk caught the version that ignored it posting "guild
+// information is not shown to your account" into the channel, which announces a
+// member's access level to everyone in it.
+test('a handler asking for privacy gets it, even though the deferral was public', async () => {
+  answers([definition()])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  appInternal.dispatchCommand = async () => ({
+    ok: true, data: { ok: true, response: { text: 'just for you', ephemeral: true } },
+  })
+  const interaction = fakeInteraction()
+  await dynamic.execute(interaction)
+  assert.deepEqual(interaction.calls.map(([kind]) => kind), ['defer', 'delete', 'followUp'])
+  assert.deepEqual(interaction.calls.at(-1)[1], { content: 'just for you', ephemeral: true })
+})
+
+test('an already-private deferral just edits — no second message', async () => {
+  answers([definition({ access: 'linked' })])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  appInternal.dispatchCommand = async () => ({
+    ok: true, data: { ok: true, response: { text: 'private', ephemeral: true } },
+  })
+  const interaction = fakeInteraction()
+  await dynamic.execute(interaction)
+  assert.deepEqual(interaction.calls.map(([kind]) => kind), ['defer', 'edit'])
+})
+
+// "You do not have access to that" is about one member and belongs to one
+// member, whatever the command's usual privacy.
+test('a refusal is always private', async () => {
+  answers([definition()])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  appInternal.dispatchCommand = async () => ({ ok: true, data: { ok: false, reason: 'forbidden' } })
+  const interaction = fakeInteraction()
+  await dynamic.execute(interaction)
+  assert.deepEqual(interaction.calls.map(([kind]) => kind), ['defer', 'delete', 'followUp'])
+  assert.equal(interaction.calls.at(-1)[1].ephemeral, true)
+})
+
+test('a refusal is phrased by the bot and edited into the deferred reply', async () => {
+  answers([definition({ access: 'linked' })])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  appInternal.dispatchCommand = async () => ({
+    ok: true, data: { ok: false, reason: 'forbidden', access: 'linked', isLinked: false },
+  })
+  const interaction = fakeInteraction()
+  await dynamic.execute(interaction)
+  assert.match(interaction.calls.at(-1)[1].content, /Link your Discord account/)
+  // Deferred ephemerally (access: 'linked'), so the refusal is one edit and no
+  // withdrawal — replying twice to a deferred interaction is what throws.
+  assert.deepEqual(interaction.calls.map(([kind]) => kind), ['defer', 'edit'])
+})
+
+test('an unreachable app is the same sentence to the member and a different line in the log', async () => {
+  answers([definition()])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  appInternal.dispatchCommand = async () => ({ ok: false, error: 'timeout' })
+  const interaction = fakeInteraction()
+  await dynamic.execute(interaction)
+  assert.match(interaction.calls.at(-1)[1].content, /Something went wrong/)
+  assert.equal(interaction.calls.at(-1)[1].ephemeral, true)
+})
+
+test('an interaction for a command the app no longer serves is left alone', async () => {
+  answers([definition()])
+  await dynamic.pull()
+  const interaction = fakeInteraction({ commandName: 'gone' })
+  assert.equal(await dynamic.execute(interaction), false)
+  assert.deepEqual(interaction.calls, [], 'nothing is deferred for a command that is not ours')
+})

bot/test/teamNotify.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+// ── The bot's half of the Team notifications bridge (TEAMS.md §7.2) ────────
+//
+// Nothing here talks to Discord. `channel` is a fake that records what was sent,
+// and the assertions are about the three things this side genuinely owns:
+//
+//   1. **the channel comes from the app and is never looked up.** `newsAnnounce`
+//      reads guild_config because there is one #news; a Team's destination is
+//      per-Team configuration, and a bot that resolved it would hold a second
+//      copy of a table it cannot see the inputs to;
+//   2. **a channel the bot cannot post to fails loudly rather than silently.** A
+//      caller that is one-shot and best-effort only logs the difference, but an
+//      operator debugging a quiet channel needs the bot's log to distinguish
+//      "not connected" from "that id is not a text channel";
+//   3. **Discord's own limits are enforced here.** An embed that exceeds them is
+//      rejected WHOLESALE, so a long forum body must be truncated on this side
+//      even though the app already excerpted it — the app's limit is a product
+//      decision and this one is a protocol constraint.
+
+const { test } = require('node:test')
+const assert = require('node:assert/strict')
+
+const teamNotify = require('../src/discord/teamNotify')
+
+// A fake channel that records what it was sent. `isTextBased` is the one method
+// the code branches on, so it is the one worth making configurable.
+function fakeChannel({ textBased = true } = {}) {
+  const sends = []
+  return {
+    sends,
+    isTextBased: () => textBased,
+    send: async (payload) => { sends.push(payload); return { id: 'm1' } },
+  }
+}
+
+function fakeClient(channel, { throws = false } = {}) {
+  return {
+    channels: {
+      fetch: async (id) => {
+        if (throws) throw new Error('Unknown Channel')
+        return id === 'chan-1' ? channel : null
+      },
+    },
+  }
+}
+
+const post = (client, over = {}) => teamNotify.postTeamNotification(client, {
+  channelId: 'chan-1',
+  stream: 'team.forum.post',
+  teamName: 'Blackthorn’s Legion',
+  teamUrl: 'https://site/guilds/blackthorns-legion',
+  title: 'Siege tonight',
+  body: 'Meet at the moongate.',
+  url: 'https://site/guilds/blackthorns-legion?thread=41',
+  ...over,
+})
+
+// ── 1. The channel is the app's decision ───────────────────────────────────
+
+test('the message goes to the channel the app named', async () => {
+  const channel = fakeChannel()
+  await post(fakeClient(channel))
+  assert.equal(channel.sends.length, 1)
+  const [embed] = channel.sends[0].embeds
+  assert.equal(embed.data.title, 'Siege tonight')
+  assert.equal(embed.data.author.name, 'Blackthorn’s Legion')
+  assert.equal(embed.data.url, 'https://site/guilds/blackthorns-legion?thread=41')
+})
+
+test('no channel id at all is refused before anything is fetched', async () => {
+  await assert.rejects(() => post(fakeClient(fakeChannel()), { channelId: '' }), /No channel id/)
+})
+
+// ── 2. A channel the bot cannot use ────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('a channel the bot cannot see is a clear error, not a silent no-op', async () => {
+  await assert.rejects(() => post(fakeClient(null)), /missing, not text-based, or not visible/)
+})
+
+test('a fetch that throws is reported the same way — the bot does not distinguish gone from hidden', async () => {
+  await assert.rejects(() => post(fakeClient(fakeChannel(), { throws: true })), /missing, not text-based/)
+})
+
+test('a voice channel is refused', async () => {
+  await assert.rejects(() => post(fakeClient(fakeChannel({ textBased: false }))), /not text-based/)
+})
+
+// ── 3. Discord's limits, and the heading ───────────────────────────────────
+
+test('an over-long title is truncated rather than rejected by Discord as a whole', async () => {
+  const channel = fakeChannel()
+  await post(fakeClient(channel), { title: 'y'.repeat(400) })
+  const [embed] = channel.sends[0].embeds
+  assert.equal(embed.data.title.length, teamNotify.TITLE_MAX)
+  assert.ok(embed.data.title.endsWith('…'))
+})
+
+test('an over-long body is truncated to the description limit', async () => {
+  const channel = fakeChannel()
+  await post(fakeClient(channel), { body: 'z'.repeat(9000) })
+  const [embed] = channel.sends[0].embeds
+  assert.ok(embed.data.description.length <= teamNotify.DESCRIPTION_MAX + 32)
+})
+
+test('a titled event keeps its heading, so a post and an announcement stay distinguishable', async () => {
+  const channel = fakeChannel()
+  await post(fakeClient(channel), { stream: 'team.announcement' })
+  const [embed] = channel.sends[0].embeds
+  assert.match(embed.data.description, /^\*\*Announcement\*\*/)
+  assert.match(embed.data.description, /Meet at the moongate\./)
+})
+
+test('a roster event has no title, so the heading becomes the title', async () => {
+  const channel = fakeChannel()
+  await post(fakeClient(channel), { stream: 'team.member.joined', title: null, body: '3 new members joined.' })
+  const [embed] = channel.sends[0].embeds
+  assert.equal(embed.data.title, 'New member')
+  assert.equal(embed.data.description, '3 new members joined.', 'no heading prefix when the title already is one')
+})
+
+test('an unknown stream still posts, under a neutral heading', async () => {
+  const channel = fakeChannel()
+  await post(fakeClient(channel), { stream: 'team.something.new', title: null })
+  const [embed] = channel.sends[0].embeds
+  assert.equal(embed.data.title, 'Team update')
+})
+
+test('a missing team name does not produce an embed with an empty author line', async () => {
+  const channel = fakeChannel()
+  await post(fakeClient(channel), { teamName: '', teamUrl: null })
+  const [embed] = channel.sends[0].embeds
+  assert.equal(embed.data.author.name, 'A team')
+  assert.equal(embed.data.author.url, undefined)
+})
+
+test('clamp treats whitespace-only as absent, which is what keeps an empty description off the embed', async () => {
+  assert.equal(teamNotify.clamp('   ', 100), null)
+  assert.equal(teamNotify.clamp('ok', 100), 'ok')
+})

bot/test/teamVoice.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,364 @@
+// ── The bot's half of Team voice channels (TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9) ────────
+//
+// Nothing here talks to Discord. `fakeGuild` records the calls, and the
+// assertions are about the four things this side genuinely owns — the ones the
+// site cannot decide because it cannot see the guild:
+//
+//   1. **The overwrite set.** @everyone denied, the Team's role allowed, each
+//      configured staff role allowed — and a staff role the operator has since
+//      deleted is FILTERED, because Discord rejects the whole set for one bad id
+//      and that would take the Team's own grant down with it.
+//   2. **The membership diff is bounded and the remainder is reported.** Each
+//      grant is its own API call; an unbounded first pass on a large guild
+//      outlives its own timeout, which is the one failure that leaves the site
+//      not knowing what was applied.
+//   3. **A member who linked Discord but never joined the guild is skipped
+//      silently.** That is §2.6 hop 3 without hop 4 — an ordinary state, not an
+//      error, and certainly not a hundred log lines.
+//   4. **A missing target is success.** A teardown that finds its channel already
+//      deleted has reached the desired end state; a sync that finds one deleted
+//      simply creates it again.
+
+const { test } = require('node:test')
+const assert = require('node:assert/strict')
+
+const { ChannelType, PermissionFlagsBits } = require('discord.js')
+const teamVoice = require('../src/discord/teamVoice')
+
+const EVERYONE = 'guild-everyone'
+
+function fakeMember(id, { canGrant = true } = {}) {
+  const roles = new Set()
+  return {
+    id,
+    roles: {
+      cache: roles,
+      add: async (role) => {
+        if (!canGrant) throw new Error('Missing Permissions')
+        roles.add(role.id)
+      },
+      remove: async (role) => { roles.delete(role.id) },
+    },
+  }
+}
+
+function fakeGuild({
+  members = [],
+  roles = [],
+  channels = [],
+  botPermissions = [PermissionFlagsBits.ManageChannels, PermissionFlagsBits.ManageRoles],
+} = {}) {
+  const memberMap = new Map(members.map((m) => [m.id, m]))
+  const roleMap = new Map(roles.map((r) => [r.id, r]))
+  const channelMap = new Map(channels.map((c) => [c.id, c]))
+  const created = { roles: [], channels: [] }
+  let nextId = 1000
+
+  const guild = {
+    id: 'guild-1',
+    created,
+    roles: {
+      everyone: { id: EVERYONE },
+      cache: roleMap,
+      fetch: async (id) => roleMap.get(id) || null,
+      create: async (opts) => {
+        const role = {
+          id: String(nextId++),
+          name: opts.name,
+          members: [],
+          setName: async (name) => { role.name = name },
+          delete: async () => { roleMap.delete(role.id) },
+        }
+        roleMap.set(role.id, role)
+        created.roles.push(opts)
+        return role
+      },
+    },
+    channels: {
+      cache: channelMap,
+      fetch: async (id) => channelMap.get(id) || null,
+      create: async (opts) => {
+        const channel = {
+          id: String(nextId++),
+          name: opts.name,
+          type: opts.type,
+          parentId: opts.parent || null,
+          overwrites: opts.permissionOverwrites || [],
+          permissionOverwrites: {
+            set: async (list) => { channel.overwrites = list },
+          },
+          setParent: async (parentId) => { channel.parentId = parentId },
+          setName: async (name) => { channel.name = name },
+          delete: async () => { channelMap.delete(channel.id) },
+        }
+        channelMap.set(channel.id, channel)
+        created.channels.push(opts)
+        return channel
+      },
+    },
+    members: {
+      me: { permissions: { has: (bit) => botPermissions.includes(bit) }, roles: { highest: { position: 7 } } },
+      cache: memberMap,
+      fetch: async () => memberMap,
+    },
+  }
+  return guild
+}
+
+const fakeClient = (guild) => ({ guilds: { fetch: async () => guild } })
+
+const voiceChannel = (id, over = {}) => {
+  const channel = {
+    id,
+    name: 'The Silver Hand',
+    type: ChannelType.GuildVoice,
+    parentId: '500',
+    overwrites: [],
+    permissionOverwrites: { set: async (list) => { channel.overwrites = list } },
+    setParent: async (parentId) => { channel.parentId = parentId },
+    setName: async (name) => { channel.name = name },
+    delete: async () => {},
+    ...over,
+  }
+  return channel
+}
+
+const category = (id = '500') => ({ id, type: ChannelType.GuildCategory })
+
+const role = (id, name = 'The Silver Hand', members = []) => {
+  const r = {
+    id,
+    name,
+    members,
+    setName: async (next) => { r.name = next },
+    delete: async () => {},
+  }
+  return r
+}
+
+// ── Preflight ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('preflight reports both permissions and the guild-wide role count', async () => {
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ roles: [role('1'), role('2')] })
+  const result = await teamVoice.preflight(fakeClient(guild), 'guild-1')
+  assert.equal(result.can_manage_channels, true)
+  assert.equal(result.can_manage_roles, true)
+  // The GUILD's roles, not ours. The 250 cap is shared with everything the
+  // operator made themselves, so counting only ours would promise headroom that
+  // is not there.
+  assert.equal(result.role_count, 2)
+  assert.equal(result.bot_role_position, 7)
+})
+
+test('preflight reports a missing permission rather than throwing', async () => {
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ botPermissions: [PermissionFlagsBits.ManageChannels] })
+  const result = await teamVoice.preflight(fakeClient(guild), 'guild-1')
+  assert.equal(result.can_manage_channels, true)
+  assert.equal(result.can_manage_roles, false)
+})
+
+// ── Overwrites ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('the overwrite set denies @everyone and allows the Team role', () => {
+  const guild = fakeGuild()
+  const list = teamVoice.overwritesFor(guild, role('900'), [])
+  assert.equal(list.length, 2)
+  assert.equal(list[0].id, EVERYONE)
+  assert.deepEqual(list[0].deny, teamVoice.ACCESS_BITS)
+  assert.equal(list[1].id, '900')
+  assert.deepEqual(list[1].allow, teamVoice.ACCESS_BITS)
+})
+
+test('a configured staff role that still exists gets an allow', () => {
+  const staff = role('777', 'Moderators')
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ roles: [staff] })
+  const list = teamVoice.overwritesFor(guild, role('900'), ['777'])
+  assert.equal(list.length, 3)
+  assert.equal(list[2].id, '777')
+})
+
+test('a staff role deleted in Discord is skipped, not sent — it would void the whole set', () => {
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ roles: [] })
+  const list = teamVoice.overwritesFor(guild, role('900'), ['deleted-1'])
+  assert.equal(list.length, 2)
+  assert.ok(!list.some((o) => o.id === 'deleted-1'))
+})
+
+// ── Ensure ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('a missing category is created; an existing one is reused', async () => {
+  const guild = fakeGuild()
+  const made = await teamVoice.ensureCategory(guild, null)
+  assert.equal(guild.created.channels.length, 1)
+  assert.equal(guild.created.channels[0].type, ChannelType.GuildCategory)
+
+  const again = await teamVoice.ensureCategory(guild, made.id)
+  assert.equal(again.id, made.id)
+  assert.equal(guild.created.channels.length, 1)
+})
+
+test('a category id pointing at something that is not a category makes a new one', async () => {
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ channels: [voiceChannel('700')] })
+  await teamVoice.ensureCategory(guild, '700')
+  assert.equal(guild.created.channels.length, 1)
+})
+
+test('the Team role is created not mentionable and not hoisted', async () => {
+  const guild = fakeGuild()
+  const { role: made, created } = await teamVoice.ensureRole(guild, null, 'The Silver Hand')
+  assert.equal(created, true)
+  assert.equal(made.name, 'The Silver Hand')
+  // A Team with two hundred members must not become a way to ping them all, or a
+  // second copy of the member list down the sidebar.
+  assert.equal(guild.created.roles[0].mentionable, false)
+  assert.equal(guild.created.roles[0].hoist, false)
+})
+
+test('a renamed Team renames its role rather than making a second', async () => {
+  const existing = role('900', 'Old Name')
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ roles: [existing] })
+  const { role: made, created } = await teamVoice.ensureRole(guild, '900', 'New Name')
+  assert.equal(created, false)
+  assert.equal(made.name, 'New Name')
+  assert.equal(guild.created.roles.length, 0)
+})
+
+test('a rename Discord refuses does not fail the pass — access matters more than a label', async () => {
+  const existing = role('900', 'Old Name')
+  existing.setName = async () => { throw new Error('rate limited') }
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ roles: [existing] })
+  const { role: made } = await teamVoice.ensureRole(guild, '900', 'New Name')
+  assert.equal(made.id, '900')
+})
+
+test('a channel a human deleted is simply created again', async () => {
+  const guild = fakeGuild()
+  const { channel, created } = await teamVoice.ensureChannel(guild, 'gone-1', {
+    name: 'The Silver Hand', category: category(), role: role('900'), staffRoleIds: [],
+  })
+  assert.equal(created, true)
+  assert.equal(channel.type, ChannelType.GuildVoice)
+  assert.equal(channel.parentId, '500')
+})
+
+test('an existing channel has its overwrites re-asserted every pass', async () => {
+  const existing = voiceChannel('600')
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ channels: [existing] })
+  const { created } = await teamVoice.ensureChannel(guild, '600', {
+    name: 'The Silver Hand', category: category(), role: role('900'), staffRoleIds: [],
+  })
+  assert.equal(created, false)
+  // Re-setting rather than diffing is what repairs a channel somebody edited by
+  // hand.
+  assert.equal(existing.overwrites.length, 2)
+})
+
+test('a channel that is no longer a voice channel is left alone and a new one made', async () => {
+  const text = voiceChannel('600', { type: ChannelType.GuildText })
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ channels: [text] })
+  const { channel, created } = await teamVoice.ensureChannel(guild, '600', {
+    name: 'The Silver Hand', category: category(), role: role('900'), staffRoleIds: [],
+  })
+  assert.equal(created, true)
+  assert.notEqual(channel.id, '600')
+})
+
+// ── Membership ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('the role is granted to the members the site named', async () => {
+  const alice = fakeMember('a')
+  const bob = fakeMember('b')
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ members: [alice, bob] })
+  const teamRole = role('900', 'The Silver Hand', [])
+
+  const result = await teamVoice.syncRoleMembers(guild, teamRole, ['a', 'b'], 50)
+  assert.equal(result.added, 2)
+  assert.equal(result.removed, 0)
+  assert.equal(result.pending, 0)
+})
+
+test('a member who left the Team has the role taken away', async () => {
+  const alice = fakeMember('a')
+  const bob = fakeMember('b')
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ members: [alice, bob] })
+  const teamRole = role('900', 'The Silver Hand', [alice, bob])
+
+  const result = await teamVoice.syncRoleMembers(guild, teamRole, ['a'], 50)
+  assert.equal(result.added, 0)
+  assert.equal(result.removed, 1)
+})
+
+test('a member who linked Discord but never joined the guild is skipped without an error', async () => {
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ members: [] })
+  const result = await teamVoice.syncRoleMembers(guild, role('900', 'x', []), ['not-in-guild'], 50)
+  assert.equal(result.added, 0)
+  assert.equal(result.pending, 0)
+})
+
+test('the diff is bounded and the remainder is REPORTED, not dropped', async () => {
+  const members = Array.from({ length: 10 }, (_, i) => fakeMember(`m${i}`))
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ members })
+  const result = await teamVoice.syncRoleMembers(guild, role('900', 'x', []), members.map((m) => m.id), 4)
+  assert.equal(result.added, 4)
+  assert.equal(result.pending, 6)
+})
+
+test('one member the bot cannot touch does not cost the other forty-nine', async () => {
+  const ok1 = fakeMember('a')
+  const nope = fakeMember('b', { canGrant: false })
+  const ok2 = fakeMember('c')
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ members: [ok1, nope, ok2] })
+
+  const result = await teamVoice.syncRoleMembers(guild, role('900', 'x', []), ['a', 'b', 'c'], 50)
+  assert.equal(result.added, 2)
+})
+
+// ── Teardown ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('a teardown deletes the channel and the role together', async () => {
+  const channel = voiceChannel('600')
+  const teamRole = role('900')
+  let deletedChannel = false
+  let deletedRole = false
+  channel.delete = async () => { deletedChannel = true }
+  teamRole.delete = async () => { deletedRole = true }
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ channels: [channel], roles: [teamRole] })
+
+  const result = await teamVoice.removeTeamVoice(fakeClient(guild), 'guild-1', { channelId: '600', roleId: '900' })
+  assert.equal(deletedChannel, true)
+  assert.equal(deletedRole, true)
+  assert.equal(result.channel_deleted, true)
+  assert.equal(result.role_deleted, true)
+})
+
+test('a teardown whose target is already gone is success, not a failure to retry forever', async () => {
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ channels: [], roles: [] })
+  const result = await teamVoice.removeTeamVoice(fakeClient(guild), 'guild-1', { channelId: 'gone', roleId: 'gone' })
+  assert.equal(result.channel_deleted, false)
+  assert.equal(result.role_deleted, false)
+})
+
+// ── The whole thing ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('a first sync creates the category, the role and the channel, and grants the members', async () => {
+  const alice = fakeMember('a')
+  const guild = fakeGuild({ members: [alice] })
+
+  const result = await teamVoice.syncTeamVoice(fakeClient(guild), 'guild-1', {
+    teamId: 1,
+    name: 'The Silver Hand',
+    categoryId: null,
+    channelId: null,
+    roleId: null,
+    staffRoleIds: [],
+    memberIds: ['a'],
+    maxMemberOps: 50,
+  })
+
+  assert.equal(result.created.channel, true)
+  assert.equal(result.created.role, true)
+  assert.ok(result.category_id)
+  assert.ok(result.channel_id)
+  assert.ok(result.role_id)
+  assert.equal(result.members.added, 1)
+})

client/src/App.jsx

@@ -42,10 +42,12 @@ import UsersAdmin from './routes/admin/views/UsersAdmin.jsx'
 import UserDetail from './routes/admin/views/UserDetail.jsx'
 import InvitesAdmin from './routes/admin/views/InvitesAdmin.jsx'
 import ModulesAdmin from './routes/admin/views/ModulesAdmin.jsx'
+import TeamsAdmin from './routes/admin/views/TeamsAdmin.jsx'
 import AccountAdmin from './routes/admin/views/AccountAdmin.jsx'
 import Moderation from './routes/admin/views/Moderation.jsx'
 import ModerationUser from './routes/admin/views/ModerationUser.jsx'
 import Appeals from './routes/admin/views/Appeals.jsx'
+import ContentReports from './routes/admin/views/ContentReports.jsx'
 
 // Player portal
 import PlayerLogin from './routes/player/PlayerLogin.jsx'
@@ -55,6 +57,8 @@ import ResetPassword from './routes/player/ResetPassword.jsx'
 import AcceptInvite from './routes/player/AcceptInvite.jsx'
 import PlayerPortalLayout, { PlayerIndex } from './routes/player/PlayerPortalLayout.jsx'
 import PlayerAccount from './routes/player/PlayerAccount.jsx'
+import PlayerNotifications from './routes/player/PlayerNotifications.jsx'
+import Unsubscribe from './routes/player/Unsubscribe.jsx'
 import PlayerAppeals from './routes/player/PlayerAppeals.jsx'
 
 export default function App() {
@@ -162,6 +166,7 @@ export default function App() {
                 <Route index element={<Moderation />} />
                 <Route path="user/:discordId" element={<ModerationUser />} />
                 <Route path="appeals" element={<Appeals />} />
+                <Route path="reports" element={<ContentReports />} />
               </Route>
               <Route path="activity" element={<ActivityAdmin />} />
               <Route path="bot-activity" element={<BotActivityAdmin />} />
@@ -174,6 +179,10 @@ export default function App() {
                   the volume in the first place. Declared here with the rest of
                   core's routes, above the module-supplied ones below. */}
               <Route path="modules" element={<ModulesAdmin />} />
+              {/* Staff-wide, like the moderation queues: the gate on the three
+                  actions that publish a game-written name is applied per request
+                  on the server, from the caller's live role (TEAMS.md 2.9). */}
+              <Route path="teams" element={<TeamsAdmin />} />
               <Route path="account" element={<AccountAdmin />} />
               {/* Installed modules' admin pages, at /admin/<id>/…, already inside
                   RequireAuth + AdminLayout. A module cannot supply its own auth
@@ -197,6 +206,10 @@ export default function App() {
             <Route path="/account/forgot" element={<ForgotPassword />} />
             <Route path="/account/reset/:token" element={<ResetPassword />} />
             <Route path="/invite/:token" element={<AcceptInvite />} />
+            {/* PUBLIC, and grouped with the other tokened landings above rather
+                than with the portal below: the person following an unsubscribe
+                link is reading their mail, not signed in (TEAMS.md §6.4). */}
+            <Route path="/unsubscribe/:token" element={<Unsubscribe />} />
             <Route
               element={
                 <RequirePlayer>
@@ -211,6 +224,7 @@ export default function App() {
               <Route path="/player" element={<PlayerIndex />} />
               <Route path="/account" element={<PlayerAccount />} />
               <Route path="/account/appeals" element={<PlayerAppeals />} />
+              <Route path="/account/notifications" element={<PlayerNotifications />} />
               {/* Installed modules' player-portal pages, at /player/<id>/…. This
                   group's own routes are absolute (its layout route has no path),
                   so the prefix is written here rather than inherited — the one

client/src/api/client.js

@@ -133,6 +133,80 @@ export const api = {
     return req(`/public/wiki${withQs(s)}`)
   },
   wikiCategories: () => req('/public/wiki/categories'),
+
+  // ----- Teams (TEAMS.md §2.11, §4.3) -----
+  //
+  // Only the two calls CORE's own client makes. Core renders no Team pages — the
+  // vocabulary belongs to whichever module owns the surface — so the index, the
+  // roster and the player list are not here; a module that renders those calls
+  // the same public API from its own client.
+  //
+  // The lookup exists because a module names a Team in its own terms and core
+  // keys the feed by slug. Resolving that is core's job precisely so a module
+  // never has to hold core's identifiers.
+  teamByExternalId: (moduleId, externalId) =>
+    req(`/public/teams/by-external/${encodeURIComponent(moduleId)}/${encodeURIComponent(externalId)}`),
+  teamActivity: (slug, opts = {}) => {
+    const qs = new URLSearchParams()
+    if (opts.limit != null) qs.set('limit', String(opts.limit))
+    if (opts.offset != null) qs.set('offset', String(opts.offset))
+    return req(`/public/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/activity${withQs(qs.toString())}`)
+  },
+  // The Team FORUM, under /player because a participant may be a plain player and
+  // a leader is a player (TEAMS.md §2.11). Core's, for the same reason the feed is
+  // core's: only core resolves whether this viewer is inside the Team, and the
+  // member/guest split is a security boundary. The module renders the PLACE.
+  teamForumThreads: (slug) => req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/forum/threads`),
+  teamForumThread: (slug, id) => req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/forum/threads/${id}`),
+  teamForumPost: (slug, body) =>
+    req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/forum/threads`, { method: 'POST', body }),
+  teamForumModerate: (slug, id, body) =>
+    req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/forum/threads/${id}/moderate`, { method: 'POST', body }),
+  // Phase 5 ("5b"). A reply, an edit and post-level moderation are separate
+  // routes from their thread-level cousins rather than the same route with a
+  // target kind, because they answer to different rules: a reply is refused by a
+  // lock, an edit by a clock, and `pin`/`lock` mean nothing to a post at all.
+  teamForumReply: (slug, threadId, body) =>
+    req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/forum/threads/${threadId}/posts`, { method: 'POST', body }),
+  teamForumEditPost: (slug, postId, body) =>
+    req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/forum/posts/${postId}`, { method: 'PATCH', body }),
+  teamForumModeratePost: (slug, postId, body) =>
+    req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/forum/posts/${postId}/moderate`, { method: 'POST', body }),
+  // The report goes to SITE STAFF, never to the Team's leaders — the whole point
+  // of it is a path that routes around a Team's own leadership (TEAMS.md §5.6).
+  // There is no leader-facing counterpart to this call and there should not be.
+  teamForumReport: (slug, body) =>
+    req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/forum/report`, { method: 'POST', body }),
+  teamForumUpload: (slug, file) => {
+    const fd = new FormData()
+    fd.append('image', file)
+    return req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/forum/uploads`, { method: 'POST', body: fd, raw: true })
+  },
+  teamGrantList: (slug) => req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/grants`),
+  teamGrantAdd: (slug, body) =>
+    req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/grants`, { method: 'POST', body }),
+  teamGrantRevoke: (slug, userId) =>
+    req(`/player/teams/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/grants/${userId}`, { method: 'DELETE' }),
+
+  // ----- notifications (TEAMS.md Part 6) -----
+  //
+  // Under /auth/me rather than /player: these are role-agnostic self-service, the
+  // same rule that put the forum under /player rather than behind a staff gate.
+  // The streams catalog and the per-stream subscriptions were built for the app
+  // and had no web consumer at all until phase 6 gave them one.
+  notificationStreams: () => req('/auth/me/notifications/streams'),
+  notificationSubscriptions: () => req('/auth/me/notifications/subscriptions'),
+  // `streams` is always sent, empty array included — the endpoint requires the
+  // field, so clearing the last subscription must not become an absent key.
+  setNotificationSubscriptions: (streams) =>
+    req('/auth/me/notifications/subscriptions', { method: 'PUT', body: { streams } }),
+  teamNotificationPrefs: () => req('/auth/me/notifications/teams'),
+  setTeamNotificationPrefs: (teams) =>
+    req('/auth/me/notifications/teams', { method: 'PUT', body: { teams } }),
+  // Unauthenticated, and the one write in the public tier: the caller is reading
+  // their mail, not signed in. Always resolves 200 whatever the token was.
+  unsubscribeTeam: (token) =>
+    req(`/public/teams/unsubscribe/${encodeURIComponent(token)}`, { method: 'POST' }),
   wikiTags: () => req('/public/wiki/tags'),
   wikiPage: (slug) => req(`/public/wiki/${slug}`),
   // CMS pages (block-based). Published-only for the public; a draft-preview link
@@ -247,8 +321,61 @@ export const api = {
     setModuleSources: (hosts) => req('/admin/modules/sources', { method: 'PUT', body: { hosts } }),
     restartServer: () => req('/admin/modules/restart', { method: 'POST' }),
 
+    // Teams (docs/website/TEAMS.md §2.11). Three of these mean something
+    // different depending on who calls them: for a moderator, unhide and
+    // setTeamDisplayName file a request and the response says `pending: true`.
+    // The caller does not choose — the server decides from the live role — so
+    // there is deliberately no "asRequest" argument to get wrong.
+    listTeams: () => req('/admin/teams'),
+    getTeam: (id) => req(`/admin/teams/${id}`),
+    resyncTeams: () => req('/admin/teams/resync', { method: 'POST' }),
+    archiveTeam: (id, reason) => req(`/admin/teams/${id}/archive`, { method: 'POST', body: { reason } }),
+    teamGrants: (id) => req(`/admin/teams/${id}/grants`),
+    hideTeam: (id, reason) => req(`/admin/teams/${id}/hide`, { method: 'POST', body: { reason } }),
+    unhideTeam: (id, reason) => req(`/admin/teams/${id}/unhide`, { method: 'POST', body: { reason } }),
+    setTeamDisplayName: (id, displayName, reason) =>
+      req(`/admin/teams/${id}/display-name`, { method: 'POST', body: { displayName, reason } }),
+    setTeamLeaderOverride: (id, body) =>
+      req(`/admin/teams/${id}/leader-override`, { method: 'POST', body }),
+    clearTeamLeaderOverride: (id, memberKey) =>
+      req(`/admin/teams/${id}/leader-override/${encodeURIComponent(memberKey)}`, { method: 'DELETE' }),
+    teamForumSettings: () => req('/admin/teams/forum/settings'),
+    // The notification bridge (TEAMS.md §7.2). Admin-only server-side, so a
+    // moderator's admin panel never renders the panel that calls these.
+    teamIntegrations: () => req('/admin/teams/integrations'),
+    saveTeamIntegration: (body) => req('/admin/teams/integrations', { method: 'PUT', body }),
+    deleteTeamIntegration: (teamId) =>
+      req(`/admin/teams/integrations/${teamId === null ? 'default' : teamId}`, { method: 'DELETE' }),
+    // Voice channels (TEAMS.md §7.3). Admin-only server-side, like the bridge.
+    teamVoice: () => req('/admin/teams/voice'),
+    saveTeamVoice: (body) => req('/admin/teams/voice', { method: 'PUT', body }),
+    teamVoicePass: () => req('/admin/teams/voice/sync', { method: 'POST' }),
+    removeTeamVoice: (teamId) => req(`/admin/teams/voice/${teamId}`, { method: 'DELETE' }),
+    teamForumUploads: (opts = {}) => {
+      const qs = new URLSearchParams()
+      if (opts.deleted) qs.set('deleted', '1')
+      return req(`/admin/teams/forum/uploads${withQs(qs.toString())}`)
+    },
+    teamForumModeration: (id) => req(`/admin/teams/${id}/forum/moderation`),
+    teamReviewQueue: () => req('/admin/teams/review'),
+    teamRequests: (status) => req(`/admin/teams/requests${status ? `?status=${status}` : ''}`),
+    decideTeamRequest: (id, status, note) =>
+      req(`/admin/teams/requests/${id}/decide`, { method: 'POST', body: { status, note } }),
+
     // ----- moderation dashboard (admin + moderator) -----
     modSummary: () => req('/admin/moderation/stats/summary'),
+    // The content-report queue (TEAMS.md §5.6). Under moderation rather than
+    // under Teams because a staffer working a queue should have one place to
+    // work, and a report about a forum post is the same job as a report about
+    // anything else — which is also why `targetType` is open-ended.
+    contentReports: (opts = {}) => {
+      const qs = new URLSearchParams()
+      if (opts.status) qs.set('status', opts.status)
+      if (opts.teamId) qs.set('teamId', String(opts.teamId))
+      return req(`/admin/moderation/reports${withQs(qs.toString())}`)
+    },
+    handleContentReport: (id, body) =>
+      req(`/admin/moderation/reports/${id}/handle`, { method: 'POST', body }),
     modRecent: (params = {}) => {
       const qs = new URLSearchParams()
       if (params.type) qs.set('type', params.type)

client/src/lib/teamActivity.js

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+// What core's Team activity feed SAYS, separated from how it renders
+// (docs/website/TEAMS.md §4.3).
+//
+// Core renders this feed into a slot a MODULE declares on its own page, because
+// Teams is a contract primitive and not a surface: core owns the feed, its
+// visibility rules and its wording; the module owns the page and the vocabulary
+// around it. So this file is deliberately narrow — the roster and index
+// presentation that once lived here went with the core Team pages, to whichever
+// module renders them.
+//
+// Plain JS with tests, following lib/teamAdmin.js. Worth splitting for the same
+// reason it was there: a feed that is filtered, or a projection that is stale,
+// has to say so in words, and getting that wording right is logic rather than
+// markup.
+
+const MINUTE = 60_000
+const HOUR = 60 * MINUTE
+const DAY = 24 * HOUR
+
+/** "just now" / "14 minutes ago" / "3 hours ago" / "2 days ago". */
+export function relativeTime(when, now = Date.now()) {
+  if (!when) return null
+  const ms = now - new Date(when).getTime()
+  if (!Number.isFinite(ms)) return null
+  if (ms < MINUTE) return 'just now'
+  if (ms < HOUR) {
+    const n = Math.floor(ms / MINUTE)
+    return `${n} ${n === 1 ? 'minute' : 'minutes'} ago`
+  }
+  if (ms < DAY) {
+    const n = Math.floor(ms / HOUR)
+    return `${n} ${n === 1 ? 'hour' : 'hours'} ago`
+  }
+  const n = Math.floor(ms / DAY)
+  return `${n} ${n === 1 ? 'day' : 'days'} ago`
+}
+
+/**
+ * How a public surface describes the projection's freshness (§2.4).
+ *
+ * Distinct from `teamAdmin.freshnessOf`, which is worded for an operator
+ * debugging a sync. A visitor needs one sentence about whether what they are
+ * looking at is current, and specifically must never be shown an unconfirmed
+ * empty projection as though it were a confirmed empty shard.
+ */
+export function freshnessNote(sync = {}, now = Date.now()) {
+  // Nothing supplies Teams here, so there is nothing to be stale ABOUT. A
+  // deployment with no game module is not a broken one.
+  if (!sync.configured) return null
+  if (!sync.lastSyncAt) return { tone: 'warn', text: 'Not yet confirmed against the game.' }
+  const ago = relativeTime(sync.lastSyncAt, now)
+  if (sync.stale) return { tone: 'warn', text: `Last confirmed ${ago} — the game may have moved on.` }
+  return { tone: 'idle', text: `Last confirmed ${ago}.` }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Group feed items into days, newest first, preserving order within a day (§4.3).
+ *
+ * Keyed by local calendar date rather than by a UTC slice: "yesterday" is a
+ * property of where the reader is sitting, and a shard's evening raid landing at
+ * 00:30 UTC belongs on the day the players experienced it.
+ */
+export function groupByDay(items = [], locale = undefined) {
+  const days = []
+  const byKey = new Map()
+  for (const item of items) {
+    const date = new Date(item.occurredAt)
+    if (Number.isNaN(date.getTime())) continue
+    const key = `${date.getFullYear()}-${date.getMonth()}-${date.getDate()}`
+    if (!byKey.has(key)) {
+      const day = {
+        key,
+        label: date.toLocaleDateString(locale, { year: 'numeric', month: 'long', day: 'numeric' }),
+        items: [],
+      }
+      byKey.set(key, day)
+      days.push(day)
+    }
+    byKey.get(key).items.push(item)
+  }
+  return days
+}
+
+/**
+ * What to say under a feed that has been filtered.
+ *
+ * Only when there is something to say: a caller who saw everything is told
+ * nothing, and an anonymous caller is invited to sign in rather than simply
+ * informed that entries exist which they cannot have.
+ *
+ * The wording avoids core's own noun. The reader is looking at a page the module
+ * titled — a guild, a clan — and "this Team" would be core's vocabulary leaking
+ * onto a surface that deliberately does not use it.
+ */
+export function activityScopeNote(feed = {}, signedIn = false) {
+  if (feed.scope !== 'public') return null
+  return signedIn
+    ? 'Some entries are visible to members only.'
+    : 'Sign in as a member to see the members-only entries.'
+}

client/src/lib/teamAdmin.js

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+// What Admin → Teams SAYS, separated from how it renders (docs/website/TEAMS.md
+// §2.4, §2.8, §2.9).
+//
+// Plain JS with tests, following lib/moduleAdmin.js. The reason it is worth
+// splitting here specifically: this screen's job is to tell an operator the
+// difference between "the shard has no Teams" and "core has not been able to ask
+// for two hours", and those two produce almost the same page. Getting that
+// wording right is logic, not markup.
+
+/** Tones the screen uses. Names, not colours — the view maps them. */
+export const TONE = { ok: 'ok', warn: 'warn', bad: 'bad', idle: 'idle' }
+
+/**
+ * How to describe the projection's freshness.
+ *
+ * The four states are genuinely different and an operator needs to tell them
+ * apart:
+ *
+ *   - no provider registered — nothing to sync, and not a fault;
+ *   - never synced — core has an empty projection it has never confirmed, which
+ *     must NOT read as "there are no Teams";
+ *   - stale — the projection is real but old, and the reason is usually in
+ *     `lastError`;
+ *   - current.
+ */
+export function freshnessOf(sync = {}) {
+  if (!sync.configured) {
+    return { tone: TONE.idle, label: 'No Team provider', detail: 'No installed module supplies Teams.' }
+  }
+  if (!sync.lastSyncAt) {
+    return {
+      tone: TONE.bad,
+      label: 'Never synced',
+      detail: 'Core has never had an answer it could trust. What is shown below is not a confirmed empty shard.',
+    }
+  }
+  if (sync.stale) {
+    return {
+      tone: TONE.warn,
+      label: 'Stale',
+      detail: `Last confirmed ${ago(sync.lastSyncAt)}. Rosters below may be out of date.`,
+    }
+  }
+  return { tone: TONE.ok, label: 'Current', detail: `Last confirmed ${ago(sync.lastSyncAt)}.` }
+}
+
+/**
+ * A short, human age. Deliberately coarse: this exists so a sentence reads
+ * "confirmed 14 minutes ago", and second-level precision would be false comfort
+ * about a projection whose interval is fifteen minutes.
+ */
+export function ago(value) {
+  if (!value) return 'never'
+  const seconds = Math.max(0, Math.round((Date.now() - new Date(value).getTime()) / 1000))
+  if (seconds < 90) return 'just now'
+  const minutes = Math.round(seconds / 60)
+  if (minutes < 60) return `${minutes} minutes ago`
+  const hours = Math.round(minutes / 60)
+  if (hours < 48) return `${hours} hour${hours === 1 ? '' : 's'} ago`
+  return `${Math.round(hours / 24)} days ago`
+}
+
+/** The status pill for one Team row. */
+export function statusOf(team = {}) {
+  if (team.status === 'archived') {
+    return { tone: TONE.idle, label: team.archivedReason === 'renamed' ? 'Renamed' : 'Archived' }
+  }
+  if (team.hidden && team.hiddenReason === 'reserved_name') {
+    return { tone: TONE.bad, label: 'Hidden — reserved name' }
+  }
+  if (team.hidden) return { tone: TONE.warn, label: 'Hidden by staff' }
+  return { tone: TONE.ok, label: 'Public' }
+}
+
+/**
+ * What a staff member is told will happen when they press the button.
+ *
+ * The gate is decided server-side from the caller's live role, so this only
+ * describes it. Saying "Request" to a moderator and "Apply" to an admin is what
+ * stops the pending result being a surprise.
+ */
+export function gateLabelFor(role, verb) {
+  return role === 'admin' ? verb : `Request ${verb.toLowerCase()}`
+}
+
+/** The three gated actions, for the note under the buttons. */
+export const GATED_NOTE =
+  'Publishing a game-written name needs an admin: a moderator’s un-hide or display-name change '
+  + 'is filed for approval. Hiding is not gated — suppression is always safe.'
+
+/** A one-line description of a queued request, for the approval queue. */
+export function describeRequest(request = {}) {
+  const payload = parsePayload(request.payload)
+  const who = request.requested_username || 'a deleted user'
+  switch (request.action) {
+    case 'unhide':
+      return `${who} asks to publish “${request.team_name}”`
+    case 'display_name_override':
+      return `${who} asks to display “${request.team_name}” as “${payload.displayName || ''}”`
+    case 'clear_display_name_override':
+      return `${who} asks to clear the display name on “${request.team_name}”`
+    default:
+      return `${who} asks for “${request.action}” on “${request.team_name}”`
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The payload may arrive parsed or as a JSON string depending on the driver, so
+ * this normalises rather than assuming either. The server has the same note.
+ */
+export function parsePayload(payload) {
+  if (payload == null) return {}
+  if (typeof payload === 'object') return payload
+  try {
+    return JSON.parse(payload)
+  } catch {
+    return {}
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * How a member's leadership should read.
+ *
+ * An override is shown AS an override rather than folded into the answer: staff
+ * looking at a roster need to see that a decision was made, not a fact that looks
+ * like the game's.
+ */
+export function leadershipOf(member = {}) {
+  if (!member.leaderOverride) {
+    return { isLeader: Boolean(member.isLeader), overridden: false, note: null }
+  }
+  const granted = member.leaderOverride.effect === 'grant'
+  return {
+    isLeader: granted,
+    overridden: true,
+    note: `${granted ? 'Granted' : 'Denied'} by ${member.leaderOverride.by || 'a deleted user'}`
+      + `${member.leaderOverride.reason ? ` — ${member.leaderOverride.reason}` : ''}`
+      + ` (the game says ${member.isLeaderSynced ? 'leader' : 'not a leader'})`,
+  }
+}

client/src/lib/teamForum.js

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+// The Team forum's client-side judgements — the few there are (TEAMS.md Part 5).
+//
+// This file is small on purpose. **Almost nothing about the forum is the
+// client's to decide**: who may post, who may moderate, whether an image
+// renders, and whether a post may be edited are all answered by the server and
+// read from the payload. What is left here is the handful of pure functions that
+// turn those answers into what a reader sees, and they are extracted so they can
+// be tested without a browser.
+//
+// The one that deserves a second look is `editOfferOpen`. It can only ever take
+// an offer AWAY — the server grants the edit and re-derives the window from
+// `created_at` when the write arrives. A client that granted one would be
+// deciding a time-bounded permission against the clock of the party it bounds.
+
+export const REPORT_REASONS = [
+  ['abuse', 'Abusive or harassing'],
+  ['spam', 'Spam'],
+  ['sexual', 'Sexual content'],
+  ['illegal', 'Illegal content'],
+  ['impersonation', 'Impersonation'],
+  ['other', 'Something else'],
+]
+
+/**
+ * Should the Edit control still be offered for this post?
+ *
+ * Three states, and the middle one is the reason this exists:
+ *   • the server said no        → no offer, and nothing here can create one
+ *   • the server said yes, no deadline (staff) → offer
+ *   • the server said yes with a deadline that has since passed while the page
+ *     sat open → withdraw the offer, rather than leave a button that fails
+ */
+export function editOfferOpen(post, now = Date.now()) {
+  if (!post || !post.canEdit) return false
+  if (!post.editableUntil) return true
+  const until = new Date(post.editableUntil).getTime()
+  return Number.isFinite(until) && until > now
+}
+
+/**
+ * Turn a rendered body back into something an author can edit.
+ *
+ * The server stores sanitised HTML and generates images at READ time from the
+ * URLs an author wrote (§5.5.3), so what comes back is not what was typed. The
+ * `<img>` has to go — it is core's output, not the author's input, and leaving it
+ * in would let an author "edit" markup they never wrote and cannot control.
+ * The URL survives as the link text beside it, which is what re-renders.
+ */
+export function stripToText(html) {
+  return String(html || '')
+    .replace(/<img[^>]*>/gi, '')
+    .replace(/<\/p>\s*<p[^>]*>/gi, '\n\n')
+    .replace(/<br\s*\/?>/gi, '\n')
+    .replace(/<[^>]*>/g, '')
+    // Entities last: unescaping before tag-stripping would let an escaped
+    // "&lt;script&gt;" become a real tag the next pass then removes, which is a
+    // different string from the one the author wrote.
+    .replace(/&lt;/g, '<')
+    .replace(/&gt;/g, '>')
+    .replace(/&quot;/g, '"')
+    .replace(/&#39;/g, "'")
+    .replace(/&nbsp;/g, ' ')
+    // `&amp;` last of all, or "&amp;lt;" would decode two steps into "<".
+    .replace(/&amp;/g, '&')
+    .trim()
+}
+
+/**
+ * The one-line summary under a thread's title in the list.
+ *
+ * `postCount` counts every post including the opening one, so a discussion's
+ * REPLY count is one less — and an announcement has no replies to count at all,
+ * which is why the count is omitted rather than shown as zero.
+ */
+export function threadSummary(thread) {
+  const parts = []
+  if (thread.type === 'announcement') parts.push('Announcement')
+  parts.push(thread.author)
+  if (thread.type === 'discussion' && thread.postCount > 1) {
+    const replies = thread.postCount - 1
+    parts.push(`${replies} ${replies === 1 ? 'reply' : 'replies'}`)
+  }
+  if (thread.status === 'hidden') parts.push('hidden')
+  return parts.join(' · ')
+}

client/src/lib/teamIntegrations.js

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+// What Admin → Teams → Notification bridge decides (TEAMS.md §7.2, phase 8).
+//
+// The view is a form; these are the rules it applies, extracted for the same
+// reason `teamAdmin.js` is: the interesting parts are decisions — when the
+// acknowledgement dialog opens, and when a standing acknowledgement stops being
+// valid — and a decision embedded in JSX is one nothing can assert on.
+//
+// **The rules here MIRROR the server's and do not replace them.** The server
+// refuses to enable a members-only bridge without the acknowledgement (422)
+// whether or not this file ever ran. What is here is so the screen agrees with
+// that answer before making the round trip, rather than showing an operator a
+// save that fails for a reason the form did not mention.
+
+// Wording an operator reads, per event id the server offers. Presentation, so it
+// lives on this side; the one bit that is policy — which events are members-only —
+// comes from the server with each event.
+export const EVENT_LABELS = {
+  'team.member.joined': 'New members joined',
+  'team.leadership.changed': 'Leadership changed',
+  'team.forum.post': 'New forum post',
+  'team.announcement': 'Announcement posted',
+}
+
+export const eventLabel = (id) => EVENT_LABELS[id] || id
+
+/** A row's identity in a list. `null` and `undefined` are both the default row. */
+export const rowKey = (row) =>
+  (row.team_id === null || row.team_id === undefined ? 'default' : String(row.team_id))
+
+export const isDefaultRow = (row) => row.team_id === null || row.team_id === undefined
+
+export const blankDraft = (teamId = null) => ({
+  teamId,
+  events: [],
+  channelRef: '',
+  enabled: false,
+  membersAck: false,
+})
+
+export const draftFrom = (row) => ({
+  teamId: row.team_id ?? null,
+  events: row.events || [],
+  channelRef: row.channel_ref || '',
+  enabled: !!row.enabled,
+  membersAck: !!row.members_ack,
+})
+
+export function appliesToLabel(row, fallback = 'All Teams') {
+  if (isDefaultRow(row)) return fallback
+  return row.display_name_override || row.team_name || `Team #${row.team_id}`
+}
+
+/** Toggle one event in a draft, preserving order of first selection. */
+export const toggleEvent = (draft, id) => ({
+  ...draft,
+  events: draft.events.includes(id) ? draft.events.filter((e) => e !== id) : [...draft.events, id],
+})
+
+/**
+ * Repointing the row drops a standing acknowledgement, in the SAME place the
+ * server does.
+ *
+ * Leaving the tick showing while the server has already decided to clear it is
+ * the one way this screen could actively mislead: an operator repoints a row at a
+ * public channel, sees "members-only destination confirmed" still ticked, and
+ * believes the confirmation they gave for a private channel covers the new one.
+ */
+export function setChannel(draft, channelRef) {
+  if (channelRef === draft.channelRef) return draft
+  return { ...draft, channelRef, membersAck: false }
+}
+
+/** Does this draft carry anything that would publish members-only text? */
+export const carriesMembersOnly = (draft, membersOnlyIds) =>
+  draft.events.some((id) => membersOnlyIds.includes(id))
+
+/**
+ * Should saving stop and ask first?
+ *
+ * Only when ENABLING. A draft that carries forum events but is switched off is a
+ * configuration being written, not a channel being published to — asking then
+ * would make an operator confirm something they have not decided to do yet, which
+ * is how a confirmation dialog becomes a thing people click through.
+ */
+export const needsAcknowledgement = (draft, membersOnlyIds) =>
+  !!draft.enabled && carriesMembersOnly(draft, membersOnlyIds) && !draft.membersAck
+
+/** The ids of every event the server flagged as members-only. */
+export const membersOnlyIdsOf = (events) => (events || []).filter((e) => e.membersOnly).map((e) => e.id)
+
+/**
+ * Which Teams may still be given an override, and whether the default is taken.
+ *
+ * Offering a Team that already has a row would only produce a save that silently
+ * overwrote it, since the unique key is (platform, team).
+ */
+export function availableTargets(rows, teams) {
+  const taken = new Set(rows.filter((r) => !isDefaultRow(r)).map((r) => r.team_id))
+  return {
+    hasDefault: rows.some(isDefaultRow),
+    teams: (teams || []).filter((t) => t.status === 'active' && !taken.has(t.id)),
+  }
+}

client/src/lib/teamVoice.js

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+// What Admin → Teams → Voice channels decides (TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9).
+//
+// Extracted for the reason `teamIntegrations.js` is: the interesting parts are
+// decisions — when the panel refuses to let voice be switched on, how close the
+// guild is to running out of roles, what a row's state actually means to the
+// person reading it — and a decision written inline in JSX is one nothing can
+// assert on.
+//
+// **These rules MIRROR the server's and do not replace them.** The server refuses
+// to enable voice while the bot cannot manage channels and roles (422) whether or
+// not this file ever ran, and the reconciler applies the threshold and the grace
+// window regardless of what the screen says. What is here is so the screen agrees
+// with those answers before making the round trip.
+
+/** Wording for each state the server can report on a row. */
+export const STATE_LABELS = {
+  none: 'Not provisioned',
+  active: 'Active',
+  pending_removal: 'Scheduled for removal',
+  error: 'Error',
+}
+
+export const stateLabel = (state) => STATE_LABELS[state] || state || 'Unknown'
+
+/**
+ * Is the panel allowed to offer the enable switch?
+ *
+ * The preflight answers three separate questions and they fail differently: the
+ * bot is not connected at all, it is connected but missing a permission, or it
+ * could not be reached. An operator can act on each of those and they need
+ * different actions, so the reason is passed through rather than flattened to a
+ * boolean.
+ */
+export function enableBlockedReason(preflight) {
+  if (!preflight) return 'The bot’s status is unknown.'
+  if (!preflight.connected) return preflight.reason || 'The Discord bot is not connected.'
+  if (preflight.missingPermissions && preflight.missingPermissions.length > 0) {
+    return `The bot is missing ${preflight.missingPermissions.join(' and ')} in this guild.`
+  }
+  if (!preflight.ready) return preflight.reason || 'The bot cannot manage channels and roles yet.'
+  return null
+}
+
+// Below this many free roles the panel starts saying so. Not a server rule and
+// deliberately not one: it is a warning, and the server's only hard behaviour is
+// to refuse the create that would exceed the cap.
+const HEADROOM_WARNING = 25
+
+/**
+ * How much room is left, and whether to say something about it.
+ *
+ * The 250-role cap is the ceiling this phase's shape brings with it. Access is a
+ * per-Team role, so it is not "how big can a Team be" — the old overwrite design's
+ * limit — but "how many Teams can have voice at all", and the difference matters
+ * to an operator with sixty guilds on their shard. It is guild-wide and shared
+ * with every role they created themselves, which is why the count comes from the
+ * bot rather than from core's own rows.
+ */
+export function roleHeadroom(preflight) {
+  if (!preflight || !preflight.roleCap) return null
+  const used = Number(preflight.roleCount) || 0
+  const cap = Number(preflight.roleCap)
+  const free = Math.max(0, cap - used)
+  return { used, cap, free, tight: free <= HEADROOM_WARNING, exhausted: free === 0 }
+}
+
+/** How a row's grace window reads while it is running. */
+export function removalCountdown(row, now = new Date()) {
+  if (!row || row.state !== 'pending_removal' || !row.removeAfter) return null
+  const ms = new Date(row.removeAfter).getTime() - now.getTime()
+  if (ms <= 0) return 'due for removal on the next pass'
+  const days = Math.floor(ms / 86400000)
+  if (days >= 1) return `in ${days} day${days === 1 ? '' : 's'}`
+  const hours = Math.max(1, Math.round(ms / 3600000))
+  return `in ${hours} hour${hours === 1 ? '' : 's'}`
+}
+
+/**
+ * Parse the staff-role field an operator types.
+ *
+ * Comma-separated ids, because that is what a person copying role ids out of
+ * Discord ends up with. Validated rather than filtered, mirroring the server: a
+ * quietly dropped id is a settings screen showing a save that did not happen.
+ */
+export function parseStaffRoles(text) {
+  const parts = String(text || '')
+    .split(',')
+    .map((part) => part.trim())
+    .filter(Boolean)
+  const bad = parts.filter((part) => !/^[0-9]{5,32}$/.test(part))
+  return { roles: parts, invalid: bad }
+}
+
+export const formatStaffRoles = (roles) => (roles || []).join(', ')
+
+/**
+ * The sentence under the enable switch, which changes meaning with the state.
+ *
+ * "Off" is not "nothing is provisioned": switching voice off suspends the
+ * reconciler in BOTH directions and leaves existing channels in place, which is
+ * deliberate — a checkbox must not delete structure in somebody's guild — but it
+ * is also surprising unless the screen says so.
+ */
+export function statusSummary(settings, rows) {
+  const provisioned = (rows || []).filter((row) => row.channelRef).length
+  if (!settings || !settings.enabled) {
+    return provisioned > 0
+      ? `Off. ${provisioned} channel${provisioned === 1 ? '' : 's'} remain in Discord and are no longer being kept in step — remove them below if they are not wanted.`
+      : 'Off. No channels are provisioned.'
+  }
+  return `On. Teams with at least ${settings.minMembers} member${settings.minMembers === 1 ? '' : 's'} get a voice channel and a role; ${provisioned} provisioned.`
+}

client/src/main.jsx

@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ import { createRoot } from 'react-dom/client'
 import { BrowserRouter } from 'react-router-dom'
 import App from './App.jsx'
 import { publishSharedDependencies } from './modules/shared.js'
-import { declareSlot } from './modules/registry.js'
+import { declareSlot, applyCoreFills, offerCoreFill } from './modules/registry.js'
+import TeamActivityFeed from './modules/TeamActivityFeed.jsx'
+import TeamForumPanel from './modules/TeamForumPanel.jsx'
+import TeamNotifyToggle from './modules/TeamNotifyToggle.jsx'
 import './styles/theme.css'
 
 // Publish window.__rg BEFORE rendering and before any module chunk evaluates.
@@ -18,8 +21,6 @@ publishSharedDependencies()
 // and namespace `uo`, so that the seam was exercised by real content from the
 // day it was built. That prediction paid out exactly as written: the extraction
 // deleted the registration and the hook it named, and SiteHeader was not touched.
-// There is nothing for core to register now — no core nav row carries a
-// `feature` — and the filter is a correct no-op until a module supplies one.
 
 // ── Extension slots (MODULE_API.md §3.7) ───────────────────────────────────
 //
@@ -56,6 +57,49 @@ declareSlot('player.invite.accepted')
 // all three, and core's own fills had to go for it to be able to — the first
 // fill wins, and core registered first (§3.7).
 
+// ── The inverted direction: core fills a MODULE's slot ─────────────────────
+//
+// Teams is a contract PRIMITIVE, not a surface (TEAMS.md Part 3). Core owns the
+// tables, the sync, the access rules and the activity feed; it does not own the
+// word for one — a UO shard says guild, and the module that comes after it will
+// say clan. So core publishes no Team page and no Team nav row, and the module
+// that owns the vocabulary owns the page.
+//
+// The activity feed is the one piece of that page core cannot hand over: only
+// core can resolve whether this viewer is inside the Team, and the public/members
+// split is a security boundary. So the module declares the place and core fills
+// it. Registered here, applied at mount — `applyCoreFills` runs after every
+// module chunk has evaluated, which is the only moment a module-declared slot
+// exists to be filled.
+//
+// **Core offers a CONTRIBUTION and never names a slot.** The module that owns the
+// page says where each of these goes, in its own vocabulary, by asking for one on
+// `declareModuleSlot`. Naming the slots here instead — which is how this was first
+// written — meant core's Team content reached exactly one module: any other game
+// declaring a place under its own id got an empty page and no error, because a
+// fill nobody asked for is deliberately not an error. It also put a module id
+// inside core, in string literals `scripts/checkModuleIdentifiers.js` masks by
+// construction and so could never have caught.
+//
+// Offering something nothing asks for is still not an error: a deployment with no
+// game module installed asks for none of these, which is the mirror of an
+// unfilled slot rendering nothing.
+offerCoreFill('team.activity', TeamActivityFeed)
+
+// The forum is core's for the same reason and goes wherever the module asked for
+// it — a SECOND place, in module-uo's case, rather than joining the feed in the
+// first: a slot takes one component (first fill wins), and stacking two unrelated
+// panels into one contribution would make the module unable to place them
+// separately on its own page. It also keeps the two independent — a deployment
+// with the forum switched off renders the feed exactly as before.
+offerCoreFill('team.forum', TeamForumPanel)
+
+// And the notification control. A third contribution rather than a corner of the
+// feed for the same reason there were two: this is an action on the page and the
+// other two are content in it, and only the module can say where each belongs on
+// a page it owns.
+offerCoreFill('team.notify', TeamNotifyToggle)
+
 // Render on DOMContentLoaded rather than immediately, and that is the one line
 // of core's boot the module system changes.
 //
@@ -82,6 +126,10 @@ declareSlot('player.invite.accepted')
 // static deferred script, so this branch is the genuine "the event has already
 // been and gone" case and not a wrong guess about our own timing.
 function mount() {
+  // Every module chunk has evaluated by now, so any slot a module declared is
+  // present and core's pending fills can land. Must happen before the first
+  // render: `extensionFor` is read during render and there is no subscription.
+  applyCoreFills()
   createRoot(document.getElementById('root')).render(
     <React.StrictMode>
       <BrowserRouter>

client/src/modules/TeamActivityFeed.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+import { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
+import { api } from '../api/client.js'
+import { useAuth } from '../contexts/AuthContext.jsx'
+import { activityScopeNote, freshnessNote, groupByDay } from '../lib/teamActivity.js'
+
+// Core's Team activity feed, rendered into a slot a MODULE declares
+// (TEAMS.md Part 4, §3.4 as amended).
+//
+// **This is the inverted slot direction, and this component is why it exists.**
+// The feed is core's: core owns `team_activity`, writes the membership and rename
+// items into it, enforces the public/members split, and is the only thing that
+// can resolve whether this viewer is inside the Team. None of that is a module's
+// to reimplement. But the PAGE is the module's, because Teams is a contract
+// primitive and core does not own the word for one — a UO shard says guild, the
+// next game will say something else. So the module declares the place and core
+// puts the feed in it.
+//
+// The module passes the Team in ITS OWN vocabulary — `externalId` plus its module
+// id — and core resolves the slug. A module never learns core's Team id and never
+// needs to: it names the thing the way it already names it.
+//
+// Everything here degrades to rendering nothing. A slot that throws is contained
+// by core's own boundary (Slot.jsx), but a slot that renders an error box would
+// still be core putting a defect on a page it does not own — so a failed fetch is
+// silence, not a message.
+
+export default function TeamActivityFeed({ externalId, moduleId, limit = 25 }) {
+  const { user } = useAuth()
+  const [state, setState] = useState({ loading: true, feed: null, team: null })
+
+  useEffect(() => {
+    let active = true
+    if (!externalId || !moduleId) {
+      setState({ loading: false, feed: null, team: null })
+      return undefined
+    }
+    // Two calls because the module names the Team its way and the feed is keyed
+    // by core's slug. The lookup is core's job precisely so the module does not
+    // have to hold core's identifiers.
+    api.teamByExternalId(moduleId, externalId)
+      .then(async (team) => {
+        const feed = await api.teamActivity(team.slug, { limit })
+        if (active) setState({ loading: false, feed, team })
+      })
+      .catch(() => { if (active) setState({ loading: false, feed: null, team: null }) })
+    return () => { active = false }
+  }, [externalId, moduleId, limit])
+
+  const { loading, feed, team } = state
+  if (loading || !feed) return null
+
+  const days = groupByDay(feed.items || [])
+  const note = team ? freshnessNote(team) : null
+  const scopeNote = activityScopeNote(feed, Boolean(user))
+
+  // Nothing has happened and nothing to explain: render nothing rather than an
+  // empty heading on someone else's page.
+  if (days.length === 0 && !scopeNote) return null
+
+  return (
+    <section style={{ marginTop: 26 }}>
+      <h2 className="display" style={{ fontSize: '1.15rem', color: 'var(--head)', marginBottom: 4 }}>
+        Recent activity
+      </h2>
+      {note && (
+        <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.8rem', margin: '0 0 12px' }}>{note.text}</p>
+      )}
+
+      {days.length === 0 && (
+        <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.9rem' }}>Nothing has happened here yet.</p>
+      )}
+
+      {days.map((day) => (
+        <div key={day.key} style={{ marginBottom: 16 }}>
+          <h3
+            className="sans dim"
+            style={{ fontSize: '0.74rem', textTransform: 'uppercase', letterSpacing: '0.06em', marginBottom: 6 }}
+          >
+            {day.label}
+          </h3>
+          <ul style={{ listStyle: 'none', padding: 0, margin: 0, display: 'grid', gap: 6 }}>
+            {day.items.map((item) => (
+              <li key={item.id} className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.92rem', color: 'var(--ink)' }}>
+                {item.summary}
+              </li>
+            ))}
+          </ul>
+        </div>
+      ))}
+
+      {scopeNote && (
+        <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.82rem', marginTop: 10 }}>{scopeNote}</p>
+      )}
+    </section>
+  )
+}

client/src/modules/TeamForumPanel.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,754 @@
+import { useCallback, useEffect, useMemo, useState } from 'react'
+import { useSearchParams } from 'react-router-dom'
+import DOMPurify from 'dompurify'
+import { api } from '../api/client.js'
+import { useAuth } from '../contexts/AuthContext.jsx'
+import { useSite } from '../contexts/SiteContext.jsx'
+import { REPORT_REASONS, editOfferOpen, stripToText, threadSummary } from '../lib/teamForum.js'
+
+// Core's Team forum, rendered into a second slot a MODULE declares
+// (TEAMS.md Part 5, and the phase 3 amendment to §3.4).
+//
+// **Why the forum is core's content on a module's page.** Everything that decides
+// who may read a thread is core's — the §2.5 resolver, the grants ledger, the
+// member/guest distinction — and none of it is a module's to reimplement. But
+// core does not own the word for a Team, so it publishes no Team page: the module
+// that says "guild" owns the page and declares a place on it, and core fills the
+// place. Same direction as the activity feed, same reason.
+//
+// **It is a whole forum inside one slot, and navigates by SEARCH PARAM.** A
+// thread needs to be linkable, and core cannot mount a route for it — the route
+// belongs to the module's page. `?thread=12` gives a shareable URL that works
+// under whatever path the module chose, with no route of core's anywhere in it,
+// and the browser's back button behaves. That is the whole reason this component
+// holds a list view and a detail view rather than being two components.
+//
+// **The image mode is published so this can draw the right composer — never to
+// decide what renders.** Post bodies arrive already rendered by the server under
+// the current policy (§5.5.3); the mode is read here only to show or hide an
+// upload control that would otherwise 404. If the two ever disagree, the server
+// is right.
+//
+// **Phase 5 added discussion, and with it three capabilities this file must not
+// invent for itself.** `canPost`, `canAnnounce` and each post's `canEdit` are
+// computed on the server and read here. In particular the edit window is a
+// server decision twice over — the read path stamps `canEdit`/`editableUntil` and
+// the write re-derives it — because a time-bounded permission must not take its
+// clock from the party it bounds. What this file does with `editableUntil` is
+// stop OFFERING an edit whose deadline has passed while the page sat open; it
+// never grants one.
+//
+// Like the feed, everything here degrades to rendering nothing. A 404 from the
+// thread list is the ordinary case — the forum is switched off, or this viewer
+// has no access — and putting an error box on a page core does not own would be
+// core reporting its own absence as a defect on someone else's surface.
+
+export default function TeamForumPanel({ externalId, moduleId }) {
+  const { user } = useAuth()
+  const { settings } = useSite()
+  const [params, setParams] = useSearchParams()
+  const [team, setTeam] = useState(null)
+  const [state, setState] = useState({ loading: true, forum: null })
+  const [thread, setThread] = useState(null)
+  const [composing, setComposing] = useState(null)   // 'discussion' | 'announcement' | null
+
+  const openThreadId = params.get('thread')
+  const imageMode = settings?.teams_forum_images || 'disabled'
+  const forumsEnabled = String(settings?.teams_forums_enabled ?? '0') === '1'
+
+  const loadThreads = useCallback(async (slug) => {
+    try {
+      setState({ loading: false, forum: await api.teamForumThreads(slug) })
+    } catch {
+      setState({ loading: false, forum: null })
+    }
+  }, [])
+
+  const loadThread = useCallback(async (slug, id) => {
+    try {
+      setThread(await api.teamForumThread(slug, id))
+    } catch {
+      setThread(null)
+    }
+  }, [])
+
+  useEffect(() => {
+    let active = true
+    // An anonymous visitor has no forum by definition — every route is behind
+    // requireAuth — so skip the two calls rather than provoking a 401 per page.
+    if (!externalId || !moduleId || !user || !forumsEnabled) {
+      setState({ loading: false, forum: null })
+      return undefined
+    }
+    // The module names the Team its own way; core resolves that to a slug. Same
+    // two-call shape as the activity feed, and for the same reason: a module
+    // never has to hold core's identifiers.
+    api.teamByExternalId(moduleId, externalId)
+      .then(async (found) => {
+        if (!active) return
+        setTeam(found)
+        await loadThreads(found.slug)
+      })
+      .catch(() => { if (active) setState({ loading: false, forum: null }) })
+    return () => { active = false }
+  }, [externalId, moduleId, user, forumsEnabled, loadThreads])
+
+  useEffect(() => {
+    let active = true
+    if (!team || !openThreadId) {
+      setThread(null)
+      return undefined
+    }
+    api.teamForumThread(team.slug, openThreadId)
+      .then((t) => { if (active) setThread(t) })
+      .catch(() => { if (active) setThread(null) })
+    return () => { active = false }
+  }, [team, openThreadId])
+
+  const openThread = (id) => {
+    const next = new URLSearchParams(params)
+    if (id == null) next.delete('thread')
+    else next.set('thread', String(id))
+    setParams(next)
+  }
+
+  const { loading, forum } = state
+  if (loading || !forum) return null
+
+  if (openThreadId && thread) {
+    return (
+      <ThreadView
+        slug={team.slug}
+        thread={thread}
+        canModerate={forum.canModerate}
+        imageMode={imageMode}
+        onBack={() => openThread(null)}
+        onChanged={() => loadThread(team.slug, thread.id)}
+        onModerate={async (action) => {
+          await api.teamForumModerate(team.slug, thread.id, { action })
+          await loadThreads(team.slug)
+          openThread(null)
+        }}
+      />
+    )
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <section style={{ marginTop: 26 }}>
+      <header style={{ display: 'flex', alignItems: 'baseline', justifyContent: 'space-between', gap: 12 }}>
+        <h2 className="display" style={{ fontSize: '1.15rem', color: 'var(--head)', margin: 0 }}>
+          Forum
+        </h2>
+        {!composing && (
+          <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 8 }}>
+            {/*
+              Two buttons, because phase 5 split one capability in two. `canPost`
+              means "may open a discussion" and every participant may — including a
+              granted guest with no game character, which is path 3 doing its job.
+              `canAnnounce` is the leader-only half.
+            */}
+            {forum.canPost && (
+              <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => setComposing('discussion')}>
+                Start a discussion
+              </button>
+            )}
+            {forum.canAnnounce && (
+              <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => setComposing('announcement')}>
+                Post an announcement
+              </button>
+            )}
+          </div>
+        )}
+      </header>
+
+      {composing && (
+        <Composer
+          slug={team.slug}
+          type={composing}
+          imageMode={imageMode}
+          onCancel={() => setComposing(null)}
+          onPosted={async () => {
+            setComposing(null)
+            await loadThreads(team.slug)
+          }}
+        />
+      )}
+
+      {forum.threads.length === 0 && !composing && (
+        <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.9rem', marginTop: 8 }}>
+          Nothing has been posted here yet.
+        </p>
+      )}
+
+      {forum.canModerate && <GuestManager slug={team.slug} />}
+
+      <ul style={{ listStyle: 'none', padding: 0, margin: '12px 0 0', display: 'grid', gap: 8 }}>
+        {forum.threads.map((t) => (
+          <li key={t.id}>
+            <button
+              type="button"
+              className="sans"
+              onClick={() => openThread(t.id)}
+              style={{
+                background: 'none', border: 0, padding: 0, cursor: 'pointer',
+                textAlign: 'left', color: 'var(--ink)', font: 'inherit',
+              }}
+            >
+              {t.pinned && <span className="dim" style={{ marginRight: 6 }} title="Pinned">📌</span>}
+              {t.locked && <span className="dim" style={{ marginRight: 6 }} title="Locked">🔒</span>}
+              <strong>{t.title}</strong>
+              <span className="dim" style={{ marginLeft: 8, fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>
+                {threadSummary(t)}
+              </span>
+            </button>
+          </li>
+        ))}
+      </ul>
+    </section>
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * The leader's grant control — §2.5 path 3, exercised by a leader rather than by
+ * staff.
+ *
+ * Worth being explicit about what this admits someone to and what it does not: a
+ * grant may name ANY account, including one with no linked game character, and it
+ * writes nothing but the grants ledger. A guest here never appears on the roster,
+ * never counts towards the Team's membership, and never becomes eligible for a
+ * Discord role — an integration cannot verify that an unlinked account is a real
+ * game member, so it must not hand that account a privilege somewhere
+ * impersonation has consequences.
+ *
+ * A leader is capped; staff are not. The cap is shown rather than only enforced,
+ * because a leader who hits a limit they were never told about reads it as a bug.
+ */
+function GuestManager({ slug }) {
+  const [open, setOpen] = useState(false)
+  const [data, setData] = useState(null)
+  const [username, setUsername] = useState('')
+  const [error, setError] = useState(null)
+
+  const load = useCallback(async () => {
+    try {
+      setData(await api.teamGrantList(slug))
+    } catch {
+      setData(null)
+    }
+  }, [slug])
+
+  useEffect(() => { if (open) load() }, [open, load])
+
+  const add = async (event) => {
+    event.preventDefault()
+    setError(null)
+    try {
+      await api.teamGrantAdd(slug, { username })
+      setUsername('')
+      await load()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not grant access')
+    }
+  }
+
+  const revoke = async (userId) => {
+    setError(null)
+    try {
+      await api.teamGrantRevoke(slug, userId)
+      await load()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not revoke that')
+    }
+  }
+
+  if (!open) {
+    return (
+      <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => setOpen(true)} style={{ marginTop: 10 }}>
+        Forum guests
+      </button>
+    )
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <section style={{ marginTop: 12, padding: 12, border: '1px solid var(--rule, #ccc)', borderRadius: 6 }}>
+      <header style={{ display: 'flex', justifyContent: 'space-between', alignItems: 'baseline' }}>
+        <h3 className="sans" style={{ margin: 0, fontSize: '0.95rem' }}>Forum guests</h3>
+        <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => setOpen(false)}>Close</button>
+      </header>
+      <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.8rem', margin: '6px 0 10px' }}>
+        Guests read and post in this forum without being members of the Team. They do not appear on the
+        roster and are not counted as members.
+        {data?.cap ? ` Up to ${data.cap} at a time.` : ''}
+      </p>
+
+      <ul style={{ listStyle: 'none', padding: 0, margin: '0 0 10px', display: 'grid', gap: 6 }}>
+        {(data?.guests || []).map((g) => (
+          <li key={g.userId} className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.88rem', display: 'flex', gap: 8 }}>
+            <span>{g.username}</span>
+            <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => revoke(g.userId)}>Remove</button>
+          </li>
+        ))}
+        {data && data.guests.length === 0 && (
+          <li className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>No guests yet.</li>
+        )}
+      </ul>
+
+      <form onSubmit={add} style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 8 }}>
+        <input
+          className="input"
+          value={username}
+          onChange={(e) => setUsername(e.target.value)}
+          placeholder="Account name"
+          maxLength={32}
+          required
+        />
+        <button type="submit" className="btn btn-primary btn-sq">Add</button>
+      </form>
+      {error && <p className="sans" style={{ color: 'var(--danger, crimson)', fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>{error}</p>}
+    </section>
+  )
+}
+
+function ThreadView({ slug, thread, canModerate, imageMode, onBack, onChanged, onModerate }) {
+  // A clock that ticks, so an edit control whose deadline passed while the page
+  // sat open goes away instead of becoming a button that fails. It only ever
+  // REMOVES an offer — the server decides whether an edit happens, and re-derives
+  // the window from created_at when it does.
+  const [now, setNow] = useState(() => Date.now())
+  useEffect(() => {
+    const id = setInterval(() => setNow(Date.now()), 30_000)
+    return () => clearInterval(id)
+  }, [])
+
+  const [replying, setReplying] = useState(false)
+
+  return (
+    <section style={{ marginTop: 26 }}>
+      <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={onBack} style={{ marginBottom: 10 }}>
+        ← All threads
+      </button>
+      <h2 className="display" style={{ fontSize: '1.15rem', color: 'var(--head)', margin: '0 0 4px' }}>
+        {thread.title}
+      </h2>
+      <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.8rem', margin: '0 0 14px' }}>
+        {thread.type === 'announcement' ? 'Announcement · ' : ''}
+        {thread.author}
+        {thread.authorDeleted && ' (account removed)'}
+        {thread.locked && ' · locked'}
+      </p>
+
+      {thread.posts.map((post) => (
+        <PostView
+          key={post.id}
+          slug={slug}
+          post={post}
+          canModerate={canModerate}
+          now={now}
+          onChanged={onChanged}
+        />
+      ))}
+
+      {/*
+        `canReply` is the server's answer to "does this thread take replies right
+        now", and it folds together the two reasons it might not: an announcement
+        takes none by TYPE, and a locked thread takes none by STATE. Both are
+        reported separately above so the reader can see which.
+      */}
+      {thread.canReply && !replying && (
+        <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => setReplying(true)} style={{ marginTop: 4 }}>
+          Reply
+        </button>
+      )}
+      {thread.canReply && replying && (
+        <ReplyBox
+          slug={slug}
+          threadId={thread.id}
+          imageMode={imageMode}
+          onCancel={() => setReplying(false)}
+          onPosted={async () => {
+            setReplying(false)
+            await onChanged()
+          }}
+        />
+      )}
+      {!thread.canReply && thread.locked && (
+        <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.85rem', marginTop: 10 }}>
+          This thread is locked. Nobody can reply to it, including staff — a moderator who wants the
+          last word unlocks it first, which leaves a record.
+        </p>
+      )}
+
+      <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 8, marginTop: 14, flexWrap: 'wrap' }}>
+        <ReportControl
+          slug={slug}
+          targetType="team_forum_thread"
+          targetId={thread.id}
+          label="Report this thread"
+        />
+        {canModerate && (
+          <>
+            <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => onModerate(thread.pinned ? 'unpin' : 'pin')}>
+              {thread.pinned ? 'Unpin' : 'Pin'}
+            </button>
+            <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => onModerate(thread.locked ? 'unlock' : 'lock')}>
+              {thread.locked ? 'Unlock' : 'Lock'}
+            </button>
+            <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => onModerate(thread.status === 'hidden' ? 'unhide' : 'hide')}>
+              {thread.status === 'hidden' ? 'Unhide' : 'Hide'}
+            </button>
+          </>
+        )}
+      </div>
+    </section>
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * One post, with whatever this reader may do to it.
+ *
+ * Every capability shown here was decided by the server and is read, not
+ * computed: `canEdit` and `editableUntil` come stamped on the post, and
+ * `canModerate` on the thread. The one local judgement is whether an
+ * already-granted edit window has since elapsed, which can only take an offer
+ * away.
+ */
+function PostView({ slug, post, canModerate, now, onChanged }) {
+  const [editing, setEditing] = useState(false)
+  const [body, setBody] = useState('')
+  const [error, setError] = useState(null)
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+
+  const stillEditable = useMemo(() => editOfferOpen(post, now), [post, now])
+
+  const save = async (event) => {
+    event.preventDefault()
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError(null)
+    try {
+      await api.teamForumEditPost(slug, post.id, { body })
+      setEditing(false)
+      await onChanged()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not save that')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  const moderate = async (action) => {
+    setError(null)
+    try {
+      await api.teamForumModeratePost(slug, post.id, { action })
+      await onChanged()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not do that')
+    }
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <article style={{ marginBottom: 16 }}>
+      <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.78rem', margin: '0 0 2px' }}>
+        {post.author}
+        {post.authorDeleted && ' (account removed)'}
+        {post.editedAt && ' · edited'}
+        {post.status === 'hidden' && ' · hidden'}
+      </p>
+
+      {editing ? (
+        <form onSubmit={save} style={{ display: 'grid', gap: 8 }}>
+          <textarea
+            className="textarea"
+            value={body}
+            onChange={(e) => setBody(e.target.value)}
+            rows={6}
+            required
+          />
+          <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 8 }}>
+            <button type="submit" className="btn btn-primary btn-sq" disabled={busy}>Save</button>
+            <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => setEditing(false)}>Cancel</button>
+          </div>
+        </form>
+      ) : (
+        <>
+          {/*
+            Sanitised on write with the forum's own profile, rendered server-side
+            under the operator's image policy, and re-sanitised here — the same
+            defence-in-depth every other body-HTML surface on this site applies
+            (FiveOnFriday, NewsletterIssue, the rich-text block).
+
+            `ADD_ATTR: ['referrerpolicy']` is load-bearing and not a preference.
+            DOMPurify's default allowlist carries `loading` but NOT
+            `referrerpolicy`, so a plain sanitize() call silently strips the one
+            attribute that limits what a remote embed leaks to the host serving it
+            — the privacy property the admin help text promises an operator. The
+            <img> itself is core's own output with a fixed attribute set, so
+            nothing here is widening what an author can write.
+          */}
+          {/* eslint-disable-next-line react/no-danger */}
+          <div
+            className="prose"
+            dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: DOMPurify.sanitize(post.body || '', { ADD_ATTR: ['referrerpolicy'] }) }}
+          />
+        </>
+      )}
+
+      {error && <p className="sans" style={{ color: 'var(--danger, crimson)', fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>{error}</p>}
+
+      {!editing && (
+        <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 6, marginTop: 4, flexWrap: 'wrap' }}>
+          {stillEditable && (
+            <button
+              type="button"
+              className="pill"
+              onClick={() => { setBody(stripToText(post.body)); setEditing(true) }}
+            >
+              Edit
+            </button>
+          )}
+          {/* Reporting your own post is pointless rather than harmful, but
+              offering it reads as an invitation to misunderstand the control. */}
+          {!post.mine && (
+            <ReportControl
+              slug={slug}
+              targetType="team_forum_post"
+              targetId={post.id}
+              label="Report"
+            />
+          )}
+          {canModerate && (
+            <>
+              <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => moderate(post.status === 'hidden' ? 'unhide' : 'hide')}>
+                {post.status === 'hidden' ? 'Unhide' : 'Hide'}
+              </button>
+              <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => moderate('delete')}>Delete</button>
+            </>
+          )}
+        </div>
+      )}
+    </article>
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * The report control — the first user-facing report flow this site has ever had.
+ *
+ * **It goes to site staff, and it says so.** The gap it closes is that leaders
+ * moderate their own Team's forum and a Team's leaders are exactly the people who
+ * will not report their own Team, so telling a member where the report lands is
+ * not reassurance copy — it is the whole reason the control is worth using in a
+ * Team whose leadership is the problem.
+ *
+ * A report changes nothing about the content, and the confirmation says that too,
+ * because a member who expects a post to vanish and watches it stay will report
+ * it again.
+ */
+function ReportControl({ slug, targetType, targetId, label }) {
+  const [open, setOpen] = useState(false)
+  const [reason, setReason] = useState('abuse')
+  const [detail, setDetail] = useState('')
+  const [done, setDone] = useState(false)
+  const [error, setError] = useState(null)
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+
+  const submit = async (event) => {
+    event.preventDefault()
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError(null)
+    try {
+      await api.teamForumReport(slug, { targetType, targetId, reason, detail: detail || undefined })
+      setDone(true)
+      setOpen(false)
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not send that')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  if (done) {
+    return (
+      <span className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.8rem' }}>
+        Reported to site staff.
+      </span>
+    )
+  }
+
+  if (!open) {
+    return (
+      <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => setOpen(true)}>
+        {label}
+      </button>
+    )
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <form
+      onSubmit={submit}
+      style={{
+        display: 'grid', gap: 8, marginTop: 8, padding: 12, width: '100%',
+        border: '1px solid var(--rule, #ccc)', borderRadius: 6,
+      }}
+    >
+      <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.8rem', margin: 0 }}>
+        This goes to <strong>site staff</strong>, not to this Team&rsquo;s leaders. Reporting does not
+        hide or change anything — it asks a staffer to look.
+      </p>
+      <label className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>
+        Reason
+        {' '}
+        <select className="input" value={reason} onChange={(e) => setReason(e.target.value)}>
+          {REPORT_REASONS.map(([value, text]) => (
+            <option key={value} value={value}>{text}</option>
+          ))}
+        </select>
+      </label>
+      <textarea
+        className="textarea"
+        value={detail}
+        onChange={(e) => setDetail(e.target.value)}
+        placeholder="Anything a staffer should know (optional)"
+        maxLength={500}
+        rows={3}
+      />
+      {error && <p className="sans" style={{ color: 'var(--danger, crimson)', fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>{error}</p>}
+      <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 8 }}>
+        <button type="submit" className="btn btn-primary btn-sq" disabled={busy}>Send report</button>
+        <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={() => setOpen(false)}>Cancel</button>
+      </div>
+    </form>
+  )
+}
+
+/** A reply to an open discussion thread. */
+function ReplyBox({ slug, threadId, imageMode, onCancel, onPosted }) {
+  const [body, setBody] = useState('')
+  const [error, setError] = useState(null)
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+
+  const submit = async (event) => {
+    event.preventDefault()
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError(null)
+    try {
+      await api.teamForumReply(slug, threadId, { body })
+      await onPosted()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not post that')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <form onSubmit={submit} style={{ display: 'grid', gap: 8, marginTop: 10 }}>
+      <textarea
+        className="textarea"
+        value={body}
+        onChange={(e) => setBody(e.target.value)}
+        placeholder="Write a reply. Paste an image URL on its own line to share a picture."
+        rows={5}
+        required
+      />
+      {imageMode === 'uploads' && (
+        <ImageAttacher slug={slug} onAttached={(url) => setBody((c) => `${c}${c ? '\n\n' : ''}${url}`)} onError={setError} />
+      )}
+      {error && <p className="sans" style={{ color: 'var(--danger, crimson)', fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>{error}</p>}
+      <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 8 }}>
+        <button type="submit" className="btn btn-primary btn-sq" disabled={busy}>Post reply</button>
+        <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={onCancel}>Cancel</button>
+      </div>
+    </form>
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * The upload control, shared by both composers.
+ *
+ * The URL goes into the BODY as text, never as an `<img>` tag. The author never
+ * writes markup here — core decides at render time whether a URL becomes a
+ * picture, which is what makes the operator's image policy enforceable rather
+ * than decorative.
+ */
+function ImageAttacher({ slug, onAttached, onError }) {
+  const attach = async (event) => {
+    const file = event.target.files?.[0]
+    if (!file) return
+    try {
+      const { url } = await api.teamForumUpload(slug, file)
+      onAttached(url)
+    } catch (err) {
+      onError(err.message || 'Could not upload that')
+    }
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <label className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>
+      Attach an image: <input type="file" accept="image/*" onChange={attach} />
+    </label>
+  )
+}
+
+function Composer({ slug, type, imageMode, onCancel, onPosted }) {
+  const [title, setTitle] = useState('')
+  const [body, setBody] = useState('')
+  const [error, setError] = useState(null)
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+
+  const isAnnouncement = type === 'announcement'
+
+  const submit = async (event) => {
+    event.preventDefault()
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError(null)
+    try {
+      // `type` is always sent explicitly. The server defaults an absent one to
+      // `announcement` so that a phase-4 client keeps meaning what it meant, and
+      // relying on that default here would make a discussion depend on a
+      // compatibility shim.
+      await api.teamForumPost(slug, { type, title, body })
+      await onPosted()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not post that')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <form onSubmit={submit} style={{ display: 'grid', gap: 8, marginTop: 12 }}>
+      <input
+        className="input"
+        value={title}
+        onChange={(e) => setTitle(e.target.value)}
+        placeholder="Title"
+        maxLength={200}
+        required
+      />
+      <textarea
+        className="textarea"
+        value={body}
+        onChange={(e) => setBody(e.target.value)}
+        placeholder={isAnnouncement
+          ? 'Write your announcement. Paste an image URL on its own line to share a picture.'
+          : 'Start the discussion. Paste an image URL on its own line to share a picture.'}
+        rows={6}
+        required
+      />
+      {isAnnouncement && (
+        <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.8rem', margin: 0 }}>
+          Announcements cannot be replied to.
+        </p>
+      )}
+      {imageMode === 'uploads' && (
+        <ImageAttacher slug={slug} onAttached={(url) => setBody((c) => `${c}${c ? '\n\n' : ''}${url}`)} onError={setError} />
+      )}
+      {error && <p className="sans" style={{ color: 'var(--danger, crimson)', fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>{error}</p>}
+      <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 8 }}>
+        <button type="submit" className="btn btn-primary btn-sq" disabled={busy}>
+          {isAnnouncement ? 'Post announcement' : 'Start discussion'}
+        </button>
+        <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={onCancel}>Cancel</button>
+      </div>
+    </form>
+  )
+}

client/src/modules/TeamNotifyToggle.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+import { useCallback, useEffect, useState } from 'react'
+import { Link } from 'react-router-dom'
+import { api } from '../api/client.js'
+import { useAuth } from '../contexts/AuthContext.jsx'
+
+// Core's per-Team notification control, rendered into a THIRD slot a module
+// declares (TEAMS.md §6.3, phase 6).
+//
+// **Why this is a slot at all, and why it is the third one.** Teams have no core
+// page — the module that owns the vocabulary owns the page — so a control that
+// acts on one Team has nowhere of core's to live. The feed and the forum go below
+// the module's roster; this goes above it, because muting a guild is an action ON
+// the page rather than more content in it, and that is exactly the placement
+// decision a module cannot make if core stacks everything into one fill.
+//
+// **It renders nothing for a viewer who is not in the Team**, including anonymous
+// ones, and that is a privacy property rather than a tidiness one: whether a
+// notification preference EXISTS for a Team answers "is this person in it", and
+// the guild page is public. The server decides — the preference list only contains
+// Teams the caller may be notified about — and this file never infers membership
+// from anything it can see on the page.
+//
+// **Muting is per-Team and covers all four streams.** The per-stream on/off lives
+// on the account screen, where the catalog does; the thing that could not be
+// expressed before phase 6 is "I am in five Teams and want notifications from
+// one", and that is the only question this control asks.
+
+export default function TeamNotifyToggle({ externalId, moduleId }) {
+  const { user } = useAuth()
+  const [state, setState] = useState({ loading: true, team: null, pref: null })
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+
+  const load = useCallback(async () => {
+    // Anonymous viewers never fetch. The endpoint would 401 harmlessly, but a
+    // guild page rendering a public roster should not put an authenticated
+    // request on the wire for every visitor.
+    if (!user) return setState({ loading: false, team: null, pref: null })
+    try {
+      const team = await api.teamByExternalId(moduleId, externalId)
+      const { teams } = await api.teamNotificationPrefs()
+      const pref = (teams || []).find((t) => t.teamId === team.id) || null
+      setState({ loading: false, team, pref })
+    } catch {
+      // Same rule as the feed and the forum: this is core's content on a page
+      // core does not own, so a failure renders nothing rather than putting an
+      // error box on somebody else's surface.
+      setState({ loading: false, team: null, pref: null })
+    }
+  }, [externalId, moduleId, user])
+
+  useEffect(() => { load() }, [load])
+
+  const { loading, pref } = state
+  if (loading || !pref) return null
+
+  async function toggle() {
+    setBusy(true)
+    // Optimistic, and reconciled from the server's echo rather than assumed: a
+    // PUT that silently dropped the entry (a Team left in another tab) must not
+    // leave the control claiming a state the server does not hold.
+    const next = { ...pref, muted: !pref.muted }
+    setState((s) => ({ ...s, pref: next }))
+    try {
+      const { teams } = await api.setTeamNotificationPrefs([
+        { teamId: pref.teamId, muted: next.muted, emailMode: pref.emailMode },
+      ])
+      const echoed = (teams || []).find((t) => t.teamId === pref.teamId)
+      if (echoed) setState((s) => ({ ...s, pref: echoed }))
+    } catch {
+      setState((s) => ({ ...s, pref }))
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <div
+      className="sans"
+      style={{
+        display: 'flex',
+        alignItems: 'center',
+        gap: 10,
+        flexWrap: 'wrap',
+        margin: '10px 0 0',
+        fontSize: '0.84rem',
+      }}
+    >
+      <button type="button" onClick={toggle} disabled={busy} className="btn btn-sq">
+        {pref.muted ? 'Unmute notifications' : 'Mute notifications'}
+      </button>
+      <span className="dim">
+        {pref.muted
+          ? 'You get no notifications about this team.'
+          : 'You get notifications about this team.'}
+      </span>
+      {/* The one link off this control, because "mute" is a blunt answer to a
+          question the account screen asks properly — which streams, and whether
+          email is on at all. */}
+      <Link to="/account/notifications" className="dim">All notification settings</Link>
+    </div>
+  )
+}

client/src/modules/registry.js

@@ -135,6 +135,120 @@ export function declareSlot(name) {
   slots.set(name, { Component: null, filledBy: null })
 }
 
+/**
+ * The contributions core has for a module-declared slot.
+ *
+ * **Core offers a CONTRIBUTION, not a slot name, and that is the whole of why
+ * this list exists.** The first cut of the inverted direction had core fill three
+ * literal names — `uo.guild.detail` and its two siblings — which worked for
+ * exactly one module and silently did nothing for any other: a second game
+ * declaring `clan.detail` under its own id got an empty page and no error,
+ * because "a fill for a slot nobody declared is not an error" is the rule that
+ * makes an unknown name invisible. It also put a module identifier in core, in
+ * three string literals `scripts/checkModuleIdentifiers.js` cannot see, since it
+ * masks string bodies by construction.
+ *
+ * So the module says WHERE (its own slot, in its own vocabulary) and WHICH of
+ * core's contributions goes there. Core never names a module id.
+ *
+ * Adding a member here is a **minor** MODULE_API bump. Requesting one that is not
+ * here THROWS at the declaration, deliberately: unlike an unfilled slot, an
+ * unknown contribution is always a typo or a version skew — core's list is fixed
+ * at build time and a module's `coreApi` range has already been checked — and the
+ * failure it would otherwise produce is a page that renders empty forever.
+ */
+export const CORE_CONTRIBUTIONS = Object.freeze({
+  /** The Team activity feed. Core's because only core can resolve the public/members split on it. */
+  'team.activity': true,
+  /** The Team forum panel. Core's because membership and manual grants are core's rules. */
+  'team.forum': true,
+  /** The per-Team notification control. Core's because it resolves whether the viewer is in the Team. */
+  'team.notify': true,
+})
+
+/**
+ * The INVERTED direction: a MODULE declares a slot and CORE fills it.
+ *
+ * Added for Teams (TEAMS.md Part 3). The original direction assumes core owns
+ * the page and a module contributes to it, which is right for the footer and the
+ * admin user detail. Teams is the other shape: **Teams is a contract primitive,
+ * not a surface.** Core owns the tables, the sync, the access rules and the
+ * activity feed; it does not own the vocabulary — a UO shard calls them guilds
+ * and the next game will call them something else — so the PAGE is the module's
+ * and the content core contributes to it is core's.
+ *
+ * Without this, core would have to publish a `/teams` page under a word it
+ * invented, next to the module's own Guilds page saying the same thing twice.
+ *
+ * A module namespaces its slot under its own id (`uo.guild.detail`), which is
+ * what stops two modules colliding and what makes the owner readable at the fill
+ * site. The namespace is enforced rather than conventional.
+ *
+ * **`options.core` names which of core's contributions belongs in that place.**
+ * It is optional — a module may declare a slot it fills itself, or one it keeps
+ * empty for now — and it is the only thing that gets core's content into the
+ * page. The place name stays the module's own word; the contribution is core's.
+ *
+ * **Ordering is why this is a separate call and not just `declareSlot` exposed
+ * to modules.** Core's bundle evaluates BEFORE any module chunk (module scripts
+ * are deferred and injected after core's), so at the moment core would like to
+ * fill one of these, it does not exist yet. Core therefore offers its
+ * contributions through `offerCoreFill` below, applied after every module chunk
+ * has evaluated — see main.jsx.
+ */
+export function declareModuleSlot(id, name, options = {}) {
+  if (!name.startsWith(`${id}.`)) {
+    throw new Error(`declareModuleSlot: "${name}" must be namespaced "${id}."`)
+  }
+  if (slots.has(name)) throw new Error(`extension slot "${name}" already declared`)
+  const contribution = options.core ?? null
+  if (contribution !== null && !Object.hasOwn(CORE_CONTRIBUTIONS, contribution)) {
+    throw new Error(
+      `declareModuleSlot: "${name}" asks for core contribution "${contribution}", which core does not ` +
+      `offer. Known: ${Object.keys(CORE_CONTRIBUTIONS).join(', ')}.`,
+    )
+  }
+  slots.set(name, { Component: null, filledBy: null, declaredBy: id, wants: contribution })
+}
+
+// Core's pending contributions, applied once every module chunk has evaluated.
+// Kept as a list rather than applied eagerly because no module-declared slot
+// exists when core offers — see the ordering note above.
+const coreFills = []
+
+/**
+ * Core: "here is my <contribution>, for whichever module asked for it."
+ *
+ * Deliberately not an error when nothing asked. A deployment with no game module
+ * installed asks for none of these, and core offering content for a page that
+ * does not exist is the ordinary case rather than a misconfiguration — the mirror
+ * of an unfilled slot rendering nothing.
+ *
+ * More than one slot may ask for the same contribution, and each gets it. Core
+ * has no reason to care how many places a module wants its feed in, and refusing
+ * the second would be core making a layout decision on a page it does not own.
+ */
+export function offerCoreFill(contribution, Component) {
+  if (!Object.hasOwn(CORE_CONTRIBUTIONS, contribution)) {
+    throw new Error(`offerCoreFill: "${contribution}" is not in CORE_CONTRIBUTIONS`)
+  }
+  if (typeof Component !== 'function') throw new Error(`offerCoreFill: ${contribution} is not a component`)
+  coreFills.push([contribution, Component])
+}
+
+/** Apply core's contributions. Called once from main.jsx, after module chunks have run. */
+export function applyCoreFills() {
+  for (const [contribution, Component] of coreFills) {
+    for (const entry of slots.values()) {
+      if (entry.wants !== contribution) continue
+      if (entry.filledBy) continue // a module already claimed it; first fill wins
+      entry.Component = Component
+      entry.filledBy = 'core'
+    }
+  }
+  coreFills.length = 0
+}
+
 /**
  * Fill a declared slot with a component.
  *
@@ -207,6 +321,7 @@ export function _reset() {
     nav[area].length = 0
   }
   providers.clear()
+  coreFills.length = 0
   // Declarations go too, unlike the server's, where a slot is declared once at
   // require time by the router that owns it. Core declares its slots in
   // main.jsx — the one file no test loads — so on this side there is nothing
@@ -224,6 +339,8 @@ export const registry = {
   registerNav,
   registerFeatureProvider,
   registerExtension,
+  // The inverted direction (TEAMS.md Part 3): the module declares, core fills.
+  declareModuleSlot,
   routesFor,
   navFor,
   featureProviderFor,

client/src/modules/shared.js

@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ import { MODULE_API_VERSION } from './version.js'
 import PublicLayout from '../components/PublicLayout.jsx'
 import PageHeader from '../components/PageHeader.jsx'
 import { Loading, ErrorState, EmptyState } from '../components/PageState.jsx'
+import Slot from './Slot.jsx'
 import { useAsync } from '../lib/useAsync.js'
 import { useAuth } from '../contexts/AuthContext.jsx'
 import { useSite } from '../contexts/SiteContext.jsx'
@@ -66,6 +67,13 @@ const ui = {
   useAsync,
   useAuth,
   useSite,
+  // The ninth member, for the INVERTED slot direction (TEAMS.md Part 3). A
+  // module that declares a slot on its own page needs the same component core
+  // renders its own with — the error boundary in particular, since the thing
+  // being contained here is CORE's content failing inside the MODULE's page.
+  // Shared rather than reimplemented for the reason the whole kit exists: two
+  // boundaries with different behaviour would be two bugs.
+  Slot,
 }
 
 // The request PRIMITIVE, not the `api` object (§3.5): a module builds its own

client/src/modules/version.js

@@ -11,6 +11,13 @@
 // that the two files can drift, so a test asserts they agree
 // (client/test/moduleRegistry.test.js) rather than trusting a bump to remember
 // both.
+// 1.6.0 — the Team surface (docs/website/TEAMS.md Part 11). Nothing on this half
+// changed yet: the two client additions the version covers are the `team.overview`
+// and `team.member.row` slots, and a slot can only be declared by the page that
+// hosts it, which lands with the Team pages in phase 3. This file bumps anyway,
+// for the reason at the top — the two halves state ONE version, and a module
+// declares one `coreApi` range against both.
+//
 // 1.5.0 — `PublicLayout` takes an optional `shell` prop ('narrow' | 'mid' |
 // 'wide') that renders the `shell-… page-body` wrapper core's own pages write by
 // hand. Additive: omitting it is 1.4.0's behaviour, so §3.4's "changing a kit
@@ -38,4 +45,4 @@
 // but the two halves state ONE version: a module declares a single coreApi range
 // and is served one chunk, so a client that claimed 1.0.0 while the server
 // answered 1.1.0 would be two answers to one question.
-export const MODULE_API_VERSION = '1.5.0'
+export const MODULE_API_VERSION = '1.6.0'

client/src/routes/admin/AdminLayout.jsx

@@ -76,6 +76,17 @@ export const NAV = [
     items: [
       { to: '/admin/moderation', label: 'Moderation', icon: IconShield, roles: ['admin', 'moderator'] },
       { to: '/admin/moderation/appeals', label: 'Appeals', icon: IconShield, roles: ['admin', 'moderator'] },
+      // Member-raised reports (TEAMS.md §5.6). Here rather than under Teams
+      // because a staffer working a queue should have one place to work — and
+      // because the queue is deliberately generic, so the next thing that can
+      // be reported arrives as a row rather than as another nav entry.
+      { to: '/admin/moderation/reports', label: 'Reports', icon: IconShield, roles: ['admin', 'moderator'] },
+      // Moderation rather than System: the screen's daily job is the
+      // reserved-name review queue, which is moderator work. The three actions
+      // that publish a game-written name are gated to admins server-side, so a
+      // moderator reaching this screen is correct — what they do here is file a
+      // request (TEAMS.md §2.9).
+      { to: '/admin/teams', label: 'Teams', icon: IconUsers, roles: ['admin', 'moderator'] },
     ],
   },
   {
@@ -134,6 +145,7 @@ const TITLES = {
   '/admin/hero': 'Hero Editor',
   '/admin/moderation': 'Moderation',
   '/admin/moderation/appeals': 'Appeals',
+  '/admin/moderation/reports': 'Reports',
   '/admin/settings': 'Site Settings',
   '/admin/appearance': 'Appearance',
   '/admin/navigation': 'Navigation',

client/src/routes/admin/views/ContentReports.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+import { useCallback, useState } from 'react'
+import Modal from '../../../components/Modal.jsx'
+import { Loading, ErrorState } from '../../../components/PageState.jsx'
+import { useAsync } from '../../../lib/useAsync.js'
+import { ago, dateTime } from '../../../lib/format.js'
+import { api } from '../../../api/client.js'
+
+// The member-raised content-report queue (TEAMS.md §5.6).
+//
+// **This is the only view of this queue, and that is the design.** The gap §5.6
+// exists to close has a specific shape: leaders moderate their own Team's forum,
+// and a Team's leaders are exactly the people who will not report their own Team.
+// A leader-visible queue would route a complaint about a leader back to that
+// leader. Org lead, 2026-08-18: reports are **site administration only**. If a
+// leader-facing view is ever wanted it is a design decision, not a component.
+//
+// It sits beside Appeals rather than under Teams because a staffer working a
+// queue should have one place to work — and because `target_type` is deliberately
+// open-ended, so the next consumer (a wiki page, a news comment) arrives as a new
+// row here rather than as a new screen.
+//
+// **Handling a report is bookkeeping about the REPORT, not moderation of the
+// content.** Acting on the content itself is the ordinary forum moderation
+// control, or a site-wide sanction against the account. Keeping those separate is
+// what stops "report" from becoming a way for any member to hide anything, so
+// this screen deliberately offers no hide/delete button of its own.
+
+const STATUS_TABS = [
+  { key: 'open_work', label: 'Open work', param: undefined },
+  { key: 'open', label: 'Open', param: 'open' },
+  { key: 'reviewing', label: 'Reviewing', param: 'reviewing' },
+  { key: 'actioned', label: 'Actioned', param: 'actioned' },
+  { key: 'dismissed', label: 'Dismissed', param: 'dismissed' },
+  { key: 'all', label: 'All', param: 'all' },
+]
+
+const STATUS_STYLE = {
+  open: { color: '#e0b070', background: 'rgba(224,176,112,0.12)', border: '1px solid rgba(224,176,112,0.4)' },
+  reviewing: { color: '#7fa8d0', background: 'rgba(127,168,208,0.14)', border: '1px solid rgba(127,168,208,0.4)' },
+  actioned: { color: '#7fd0a4', background: 'rgba(95,185,138,0.16)', border: '1px solid rgba(95,185,138,0.4)' },
+  dismissed: { color: '#9fb0c6', background: 'rgba(127,153,189,0.14)', border: '1px solid var(--line)' },
+}
+const STATUS_LABEL = {
+  open: 'Open', reviewing: 'Reviewing', actioned: 'Actioned', dismissed: 'Dismissed',
+}
+
+const REASON_LABEL = {
+  spam: 'Spam',
+  abuse: 'Abuse',
+  sexual: 'Sexual',
+  illegal: 'Illegal',
+  impersonation: 'Impersonation',
+  other: 'Other',
+}
+
+const bytes = (n) => {
+  if (!n && n !== 0) return ''
+  if (n < 1024) return `${n} B`
+  if (n < 1024 * 1024) return `${Math.round(n / 1024)} KB`
+  return `${(n / (1024 * 1024)).toFixed(1)} MB`
+}
+
+/**
+ * What was reported, rendered from the row the queue already resolved.
+ *
+ * Nothing here fetches: §5.6's fourth rule is that a staffer sees uploader, size
+ * and sniffed type without hunting, and the server attaches all of it in three
+ * batched reads. A `null` target is a target that has since been hard-deleted,
+ * and the row still shows — "somebody reported this and by the time we looked it
+ * was gone" is a fact worth seeing, and dropping it would hide the pattern of a
+ * member deleting their own content the moment it is reported.
+ */
+function TargetCell({ report }) {
+  const t = report.target
+  if (!t) {
+    return (
+      <span style={{ color: 'var(--muted)' }}>
+        {report.targetType.replace('team_forum_', '')} #{report.targetId} — no longer exists
+      </span>
+    )
+  }
+  if (t.kind === 'upload') {
+    return (
+      <span>
+        <a href={t.url} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" className="link-accent">{t.filename}</a>
+        <span className="dim" style={{ display: 'block', fontSize: '0.78rem' }}>
+          {t.uploader || 'unknown'} · {t.mimetype} · {bytes(t.byteSize)}
+          {t.deleted && ' · removed'}
+        </span>
+      </span>
+    )
+  }
+  if (t.kind === 'thread') {
+    return (
+      <span>
+        <strong>{t.title}</strong>
+        <span className="dim" style={{ display: 'block', fontSize: '0.78rem' }}>
+          {t.type} by {t.author || 'unknown'}
+          {t.status !== 'visible' && ` · ${t.status}`}
+        </span>
+      </span>
+    )
+  }
+  return (
+    <span>
+      {t.excerpt || <em className="dim">(no text)</em>}
+      <span className="dim" style={{ display: 'block', fontSize: '0.78rem' }}>
+        {t.author || 'unknown'} in “{t.threadTitle}”
+        {t.status !== 'visible' && ` · ${t.status}`}
+      </span>
+    </span>
+  )
+}
+
+export default function ContentReports() {
+  const [tab, setTab] = useState('open_work')
+  const [tick, setTick] = useState(0)
+  const reload = useCallback(() => setTick((t) => t + 1), [])
+  const [handling, setHandling] = useState(null)
+  const [notice, setNotice] = useState(null)
+
+  const activeTab = STATUS_TABS.find((t) => t.key === tab) || STATUS_TABS[0]
+  const { loading, error, data } = useAsync(
+    () => api.admin.contentReports({ status: activeTab.param }),
+    [tab, tick],
+  )
+
+  if (loading) return <Loading />
+  if (error) return <ErrorState message="Could not load reports." />
+
+  const rows = data?.reports || []
+
+  return (
+    <section>
+      <p className="sans dim" style={{ margin: '0 0 14px', fontSize: '0.85rem', maxWidth: 720 }}>
+        Reports raised by members about Team forum content. They come to site staff and are not visible
+        to a Team&rsquo;s own leaders — a leader moderates their own forum, so a report about a leader
+        has to reach someone above them. Handling a report records a decision about the report; hiding
+        or removing the content itself is done from the forum, or as a sanction against the account.
+        {typeof data?.openCount === 'number' && ` ${data.openCount} open.`}
+      </p>
+
+      <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 6, flexWrap: 'wrap', marginBottom: 16 }}>
+        {STATUS_TABS.map((t) => (
+          <button
+            key={t.key}
+            onClick={() => setTab(t.key)}
+            className="pill"
+            style={tab === t.key ? activePill : undefined}
+          >
+            {t.label}
+          </button>
+        ))}
+      </div>
+
+      {notice && (
+        <p
+          className="sans"
+          style={{ margin: '0 0 14px', color: notice.tone === 'error' ? '#d98b84' : '#7fd0a4', fontSize: '0.85rem' }}
+        >
+          {notice.text}
+        </p>
+      )}
+
+      <div className="panel-flat">
+        <table className="adm-table">
+          <thead>
+            <tr>
+              <th className="adm-th">Reported content</th>
+              <th className="adm-th">Reason</th>
+              <th className="adm-th">Detail</th>
+              <th className="adm-th">Reporter</th>
+              <th className="adm-th">Age</th>
+              <th className="adm-th">Status</th>
+              <th className="adm-th" />
+            </tr>
+          </thead>
+          <tbody>
+            {rows.length === 0 && (
+              <tr>
+                <td className="adm-td" colSpan={7} style={muted}>
+                  No reports match this filter.
+                </td>
+              </tr>
+            )}
+            {rows.map((r) => (
+              <tr key={r.id}>
+                <td className="adm-td" style={{ color: 'var(--text)', maxWidth: 340 }}>
+                  <TargetCell report={r} />
+                </td>
+                <td className="adm-td">
+                  <span className="badge">{REASON_LABEL[r.reason] || r.reason}</span>
+                </td>
+                <td className="adm-td dim" style={{ maxWidth: 260 }}>{r.detail || '—'}</td>
+                <td className="adm-td dim">{r.reporter}</td>
+                <td className="adm-td dim" title={dateTime(r.createdAt)}>{ago(r.createdAt)}</td>
+                <td className="adm-td">
+                  <span className="badge" style={STATUS_STYLE[r.status]}>{STATUS_LABEL[r.status] || r.status}</span>
+                  {r.handledBy && (
+                    <span className="dim" style={{ display: 'block', fontSize: '0.75rem' }}>
+                      {r.handledBy}
+                      {r.handledNote ? ` — ${r.handledNote}` : ''}
+                    </span>
+                  )}
+                </td>
+                <td className="adm-td" style={{ textAlign: 'right', whiteSpace: 'nowrap' }}>
+                  <button
+                    onClick={() => setHandling(r)}
+                    className="btn btn-primary btn-sq"
+                    style={{ padding: '5px 12px', fontSize: '0.82rem' }}
+                  >
+                    Handle
+                  </button>
+                </td>
+              </tr>
+            ))}
+          </tbody>
+        </table>
+      </div>
+
+      {handling && (
+        <HandleModal
+          report={handling}
+          onCancel={() => setHandling(null)}
+          onDone={() => {
+            setHandling(null)
+            setNotice({ text: 'Report updated.', tone: 'ok' })
+            reload()
+          }}
+          onError={(message) => setNotice({ text: message, tone: 'error' })}
+        />
+      )}
+    </section>
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * Record a decision about a report.
+ *
+ * The note is optional and worth writing: every transition is audited, dismissals
+ * included, and the note is what the next staffer to see a repeat report about the
+ * same content reads to find out why the last one was closed.
+ */
+function HandleModal({ report, onCancel, onDone, onError }) {
+  const [status, setStatus] = useState(report.status === 'open' ? 'reviewing' : 'actioned')
+  const [note, setNote] = useState('')
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+
+  const submit = async () => {
+    setBusy(true)
+    try {
+      await api.admin.handleContentReport(report.id, { status, note: note || undefined })
+      onDone()
+    } catch (err) {
+      onError(err.message || 'Could not update that report.')
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <Modal
+      title={`Report #${report.id}`}
+      onClose={onCancel}
+      footer={(
+        <>
+          <button className="pill" onClick={onCancel}>Cancel</button>
+          <button className="btn btn-primary btn-sq" onClick={submit} disabled={busy}>
+            {busy ? 'Saving…' : 'Save'}
+          </button>
+        </>
+      )}
+    >
+      <div style={{ display: 'grid', gap: 12 }}>
+        <p className="sans dim" style={{ margin: 0, fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>
+          This records a decision about the report. It does not hide, delete or restore the content —
+          do that from the forum itself, or against the account.
+        </p>
+
+        <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 6, flexWrap: 'wrap' }}>
+          {['reviewing', 'actioned', 'dismissed', 'open'].map((value) => (
+            <button
+              key={value}
+              onClick={() => setStatus(value)}
+              className="pill"
+              style={status === value ? activePill : undefined}
+            >
+              {STATUS_LABEL[value]}
+            </button>
+          ))}
+        </div>
+
+        <label>
+          <span className="field-label">Note (optional)</span>
+          <textarea
+            className="textarea"
+            placeholder="Why this was actioned or dismissed — the next staffer to see a repeat report reads this."
+            value={note}
+            onChange={(e) => setNote(e.target.value)}
+            maxLength={500}
+            rows={4}
+            style={{ width: '100%' }}
+          />
+        </label>
+      </div>
+    </Modal>
+  )
+}
+
+const activePill = { background: 'var(--blue)', color: 'var(--ink)', borderColor: 'var(--accent)' }
+const muted = { color: 'var(--muted)' }

client/src/routes/admin/views/SettingsAdmin.jsx

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ import { Loading, ErrorState } from '../../../components/PageState.jsx'
 import { api } from '../../../api/client.js'
 import { useSite } from '../../../contexts/SiteContext.jsx'
 import EmailDelivery from './EmailDelivery.jsx'
+import TeamForumSettings from './TeamForumSettings.jsx'
 
 // Lazy-loaded so the heavy rich-text editor stays code-split (matches PostEditor).
 const RichTextEditor = lazy(() => import('../../../components/RichTextEditor.jsx'))
@@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ export default function SettingsAdmin() {
         </div>
       </div>
 
+      <TeamForumSettings />
+
       <EmailDelivery />
     </section>
   )

client/src/routes/admin/views/TeamForumSettings.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,276 @@
+import { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
+import { api } from '../../../api/client.js'
+import { useSite } from '../../../contexts/SiteContext.jsx'
+
+// The operator's Team-forum controls (TEAMS.md §5.5, plus phase 5's edit window),
+// and the acknowledgement.
+//
+// Its own panel rather than two more rows in SettingsAdmin's FIELDS table, for the
+// same reason EmailDelivery is its own: one of these settings has a server-side
+// PRECONDITION and a confirmation flow, and a control with a precondition inside a
+// generic list of key/value inputs is one whose behaviour nobody reading that list
+// would predict.
+//
+// **The checkbox below is not the gate.** The server rejects `teams_forum_images =
+// 'uploads'` with 400 unless the same request carries the acknowledgement version,
+// and it does so whether or not this dialog was ever rendered. What is here is how
+// the gate is PRESENTED — the wording an operator agrees to, and the recording of
+// which version they agreed to.
+
+// §5.5.5(a). Rendered beneath the selector at ALL times, in every mode: it
+// explains what the setting is, which is a different job from the confirmation.
+const HELP_TEXT = [
+  'Image uploads are disabled by default.',
+  'Enabling uploads allows users to store files on infrastructure that you control.',
+  'By enabling this feature, you acknowledge that you are responsible for:',
+]
+const HELP_BULLETS = [
+  'Moderating uploaded content',
+  'Managing storage and backups',
+  'Complying with applicable laws and regulations',
+  'Establishing policies for your community',
+]
+const HELP_TAIL = [
+  'Runic Gateway does not provide hosted storage or content moderation services. All uploaded content'
+    + ' is stored on your own infrastructure.',
+  // Addition 1 — the reassuring counterpart, and the reason the attribution table
+  // in §5.5.4 exists at all.
+  'Uploads are attributed to the account that made them, and your staff can remove them at any time.',
+  // Addition 3 — the blast radius. "Users" is doing a lot of work: forum access is
+  // not the same as game membership, so this genuinely surprises.
+  'Anyone with access to a team forum can upload, including members granted access manually who have'
+    + ' no linked game account.',
+]
+
+// §5.5.2's non-blocking advisory for `remote`. Not an acknowledgement — nothing is
+// stored in that mode — but the operator's server is still doing the displaying.
+const REMOTE_ADVISORY = 'Images hosted elsewhere are loaded by each visitor’s browser directly from the'
+  + ' site hosting them. That site can see your visitors’ IP addresses, and you do not control whether'
+  + ' the image changes or disappears.'
+
+// §5.5.5(b). Shown only when changing the mode TO uploads.
+const DIALOG_CHECKS = [
+  'I understand that uploaded files will be stored on infrastructure that I control.',
+  'I understand that I am responsible for community moderation policies on this installation.',
+]
+// Addition 2 — the expectation gap most likely to bite. An operator who turns
+// uploads off because of a problem will assume the problem goes with it.
+const DIALOG_TAIL = 'Disabling uploads later stops new files being accepted. It does not delete files'
+  + ' already uploaded — remove those from the forum moderation tools.'
+
+const MODES = [
+  { value: 'disabled', label: 'Disabled — image URLs stay plain links' },
+  { value: 'remote', label: 'Remote — images hosted elsewhere are shown' },
+  { value: 'uploads', label: 'Uploads — members may upload images to this server' },
+]
+
+export default function TeamForumSettings() {
+  const { refresh: refreshSite } = useSite()
+  const [state, setState] = useState(null)
+  const [enabled, setEnabled] = useState(false)
+  const [mode, setMode] = useState('disabled')
+  const [editWindow, setEditWindow] = useState('15')
+  const [dialog, setDialog] = useState(null)
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+  const [error, setError] = useState('')
+  const [saved, setSaved] = useState(false)
+
+  const load = async () => {
+    try {
+      const s = await api.admin.teamForumSettings()
+      setState(s)
+      setEnabled(s.enabled)
+      setMode(s.imageMode)
+      setEditWindow(String(s.editWindowMinutes ?? 15))
+    } catch {
+      setError('Could not load forum settings.')
+    }
+  }
+
+  useEffect(() => { load() }, [])
+
+  if (!state) return null
+
+  const stale = state.acknowledgement?.stale
+
+  async function persist(next, acknowledge) {
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError('')
+    try {
+      await api.admin.updateSettings({
+        teams_forums_enabled: next.enabled ? '1' : '0',
+        teams_forum_images: next.mode,
+        teams_forum_edit_window_minutes: String(next.editWindow),
+        ...(acknowledge ? { acknowledge } : {}),
+      })
+      setSaved(true)
+      await load()
+      await refreshSite()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not save forum settings.')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Moving TO uploads asks first; every other change saves directly. A stale
+  // acknowledgement also routes through the dialog, because re-acknowledging is
+  // the only thing that unfreezes these settings.
+  function save() {
+    setSaved(false)
+    if (mode === 'uploads' && (!state.acknowledgement?.given || stale || state.imageMode !== 'uploads')) {
+      setDialog({ enabled, mode, editWindow })
+      return
+    }
+    if (stale) {
+      setDialog({ enabled, mode, editWindow })
+      return
+    }
+    persist({ enabled, mode, editWindow })
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <section style={{ marginTop: 34, maxWidth: 620 }}>
+      <h2 className="display" style={{ fontSize: '1.05rem', marginBottom: 4 }}>Team forums</h2>
+
+      {stale && (
+        <p className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.82rem', color: '#e0b877', margin: '0 0 12px' }}>
+          The image-upload notice has changed since it was accepted
+          {state.acknowledgement.acknowledgedBy ? ` by ${state.acknowledgement.acknowledgedBy}` : ''}.
+          Uploads keep working, but no forum setting can be saved until it is acknowledged again.
+        </p>
+      )}
+
+      <label style={{ display: 'block', marginBottom: 14 }}>
+        <input
+          type="checkbox"
+          checked={enabled}
+          onChange={(e) => { setEnabled(e.target.checked); setSaved(false) }}
+          style={{ marginRight: 8 }}
+        />
+        <span className="field-label" style={{ display: 'inline' }}>Enable Team forums</span>
+        <span className="sans dim" style={{ display: 'block', marginTop: 6, fontSize: '0.76rem' }}>
+          Off by default. Switching forums off hides them completely — every forum route answers “not
+          found” — but deletes nothing: threads, posts, access grants and notification preferences all
+          survive and come back exactly as they were.
+        </span>
+      </label>
+
+      <label style={{ display: 'block' }}>
+        <span className="field-label">Images in forum posts</span>
+        <select value={mode} onChange={(e) => { setMode(e.target.value); setSaved(false) }} className="select">
+          {MODES.map((m) => <option key={m.value} value={m.value}>{m.label}</option>)}
+        </select>
+      </label>
+
+      <label style={{ display: 'block', marginTop: 14 }}>
+        <span className="field-label">Post edit window (minutes)</span>
+        <input
+          type="number"
+          className="input"
+          min={0}
+          max={state.editWindowMax ?? 1440}
+          value={editWindow}
+          onChange={(e) => { setEditWindow(e.target.value); setSaved(false) }}
+          style={{ maxWidth: 120 }}
+        />
+        <span className="sans dim" style={{ display: 'block', marginTop: 6, fontSize: '0.76rem' }}>
+          How long an author may edit their own post after writing it. Staff are not bound by it and
+          may edit at any time. Set it to 0 to make posts permanent once written — a bound of some
+          kind is what stops a post being rewritten out from under someone quoting it, or under a
+          moderator about to act on a report.
+        </span>
+      </label>
+
+      <div className="sans dim" style={{ marginTop: 8, fontSize: '0.76rem', lineHeight: 1.55 }}>
+        {HELP_TEXT.map((line) => <p key={line} style={{ margin: '0 0 6px' }}>{line}</p>)}
+        <ul style={{ margin: '0 0 6px 18px' }}>
+          {HELP_BULLETS.map((b) => <li key={b}>{b}</li>)}
+        </ul>
+        {HELP_TAIL.map((line) => <p key={line} style={{ margin: '0 0 6px' }}>{line}</p>)}
+        {mode !== 'disabled' && (
+          <p style={{ margin: '0 0 6px', color: '#e0b877' }}>{REMOTE_ADVISORY}</p>
+        )}
+      </div>
+
+      <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 10, marginTop: 12, alignItems: 'center' }}>
+        <button onClick={save} disabled={busy} className="btn btn-primary btn-sq">
+          {busy ? 'Saving…' : 'Save forum settings'}
+        </button>
+        {saved && <span className="sans" style={{ color: '#7fd0a4', fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>Saved.</span>}
+        {error && <span className="sans" style={{ color: '#d98b84', fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>{error}</span>}
+      </div>
+
+      {dialog && (
+        <UploadsDialog
+          version={state.acknowledgement.version}
+          onCancel={() => {
+            setDialog(null)
+            setMode(state.imageMode)
+            setEnabled(state.enabled)
+            setEditWindow(String(state.editWindowMinutes ?? 15))
+          }}
+          onConfirm={async (version) => {
+            setDialog(null)
+            await persist(dialog, version)
+          }}
+        />
+      )}
+    </section>
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * Two checkboxes, one recorded acknowledgement.
+ *
+ * `Enable uploads` stays disabled until both are ticked, but the request carries a
+ * single version and the stored value is the text VERSION. Recording two booleans
+ * would add nothing — there is no reachable state where an operator consented to
+ * one clause and not the other and proceeded anyway — while the version answers
+ * the question that actually matters later: which text did they agree to?
+ */
+function UploadsDialog({ version, onCancel, onConfirm }) {
+  const [checks, setChecks] = useState(DIALOG_CHECKS.map(() => false))
+  const all = checks.every(Boolean)
+
+  return (
+    <div
+      role="dialog"
+      aria-modal="true"
+      aria-label="Enable image uploads"
+      style={{
+        marginTop: 14, padding: 14, border: '1px solid #e0b877', borderRadius: 6,
+      }}
+    >
+      <p className="sans" style={{ margin: '0 0 8px', fontWeight: 600 }}>
+        ⚠ Image uploads are currently disabled.
+      </p>
+      <p className="sans" style={{ margin: '0 0 10px', fontSize: '0.88rem' }}>
+        Enabling uploads will allow users to store files on your server.
+      </p>
+      {DIALOG_CHECKS.map((text, i) => (
+        <label key={text} className="sans" style={{ display: 'block', fontSize: '0.85rem', marginBottom: 6 }}>
+          <input
+            type="checkbox"
+            checked={checks[i]}
+            onChange={(e) => setChecks((c) => c.map((v, j) => (j === i ? e.target.checked : v)))}
+            style={{ marginRight: 8 }}
+          />
+          {text}
+        </label>
+      ))}
+      <p className="sans dim" style={{ margin: '10px 0', fontSize: '0.8rem' }}>{DIALOG_TAIL}</p>
+      <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 10 }}>
+        <button type="button" className="pill" onClick={onCancel}>Cancel</button>
+        <button
+          type="button"
+          className="btn btn-primary btn-sq"
+          disabled={!all}
+          onClick={() => onConfirm(version)}
+        >
+          Enable uploads
+        </button>
+      </div>
+    </div>
+  )
+}

client/src/routes/admin/views/TeamIntegrations.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
+import { useCallback, useEffect, useState } from 'react'
+import { api } from '../../../api/client.js'
+import {
+  eventLabel, rowKey, isDefaultRow, blankDraft, draftFrom, appliesToLabel, toggleEvent,
+  setChannel, needsAcknowledgement, membersOnlyIdsOf, availableTargets,
+} from '../../../lib/teamIntegrations.js'
+
+// The Team notification bridge (TEAMS.md §7.2, phase 8).
+//
+// Named for the TEAM concern rather than for Discord, and placed under Teams
+// rather than in the Discord Bot panel, because phase 10 replaces "Discord" here
+// with whatever the capability registry declares. What changes then should be
+// what fills this panel, not where an operator goes to find it. Nothing below
+// hardcodes the word except the heading the server sends as `platform`.
+//
+// **The checkbox in the dialog is not the gate.** The server refuses to enable a
+// row carrying `team.forum.post` or `team.announcement` without the
+// acknowledgement, 422, whether or not this dialog was ever rendered — the same
+// division TeamForumSettings draws for image uploads. What is here is how the
+// gate is PRESENTED: the sentence an operator agrees to, and the fact that
+// agreeing is a deliberate act rather than a checkbox they tab past.
+
+const ACK_TEXT = [
+  'Forum posts and announcements are visible only to a Team’s members. This site cannot see who can'
+    + ' read a channel on another platform, so it cannot check that for you.',
+  'By enabling these events you confirm that the destination channel is restricted to the members of'
+    + ' the Team whose posts it will carry.',
+]
+
+export default function TeamIntegrations() {
+  const [config, setConfig] = useState(null)
+  const [teams, setTeams] = useState([])
+  const [draft, setDraft] = useState(null)
+  const [dialog, setDialog] = useState(null)
+  const [error, setError] = useState('')
+  const [notice, setNotice] = useState('')
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+
+  const load = useCallback(async () => {
+    setError('')
+    try {
+      const [cfg, teamList] = await Promise.all([api.admin.teamIntegrations(), api.admin.listTeams()])
+      setConfig(cfg)
+      setTeams((teamList.teams || []).filter((t) => t.status === 'active'))
+    } catch (err) {
+      // A moderator never reaches this panel — the admin nav does not render it —
+      // so a 403 here means the role changed underneath an open tab rather than a
+      // routing mistake, and saying so beats "could not load".
+      setError(err.status === 403 ? 'Only an admin can configure the notification bridge.' : (err.message || 'Could not load the bridge configuration.'))
+    }
+  }, [])
+
+  useEffect(() => { load() }, [load])
+
+  if (!config) {
+    return (
+      <section style={{ marginTop: 34, maxWidth: 760 }}>
+        <h2 className="display" style={{ fontSize: '1.05rem', marginBottom: 4 }}>Notification bridge</h2>
+        {error && <p className="sans" style={{ color: '#e08b77', fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>{error}</p>}
+      </section>
+    )
+  }
+
+  const membersOnlyIds = membersOnlyIdsOf(config.events)
+  const { hasDefault, teams: available } = availableTargets(config.rows, teams)
+
+  async function persist(next) {
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError('')
+    setNotice('')
+    try {
+      await api.admin.saveTeamIntegration({
+        teamId: next.teamId,
+        events: next.events,
+        channelRef: next.channelRef.trim() || null,
+        enabled: next.enabled,
+        membersAck: next.membersAck,
+      })
+      setDraft(null)
+      setDialog(null)
+      setNotice('Saved.')
+      await load()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not save.')
+      setDialog(null)
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Enabling members-only events without a standing acknowledgement asks first.
+  // Everything else — disabling, editing a channel, adding a roster event — saves
+  // straight through.
+  function save() {
+    if (!draft) return
+    if (needsAcknowledgement(draft, membersOnlyIds)) {
+      setDialog(draft)
+      return
+    }
+    persist(draft)
+  }
+
+  async function remove(row) {
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError('')
+    try {
+      await api.admin.deleteTeamIntegration(row.team_id ?? null)
+      setNotice('Removed.')
+      await load()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not remove.')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <section style={{ marginTop: 34, maxWidth: 760 }}>
+      <h2 className="display" style={{ fontSize: '1.05rem', marginBottom: 4 }}>Notification bridge</h2>
+      <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.78rem', margin: '0 0 14px' }}>
+        Send Team notifications to a {config.platform} channel. Set a default that every Team uses, and
+        override it for individual Teams. A message is sent once and not retried — the bridge is a
+        courtesy, and nothing on the site depends on it arriving.
+      </p>
+
+      {error && <p className="sans" style={{ color: '#e08b77', fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>{error}</p>}
+      {notice && <p className="sans" style={{ color: '#8fbf7a', fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>{notice}</p>}
+
+      {config.rows.length === 0 && !draft && (
+        <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.8rem' }}>Nothing configured — no Team events leave the site.</p>
+      )}
+
+      {config.rows.length > 0 && (
+        <table className="table">
+          <thead>
+            <tr><th>Applies to</th><th>Events</th><th>Channel</th><th>State</th><th /></tr>
+          </thead>
+          <tbody>
+            {config.rows.map((row) => (
+              <tr key={rowKey(row)}>
+                <td>
+                  {appliesToLabel(row)}
+                  {isDefaultRow(row) && <span className="dim"> (default)</span>}
+                </td>
+                <td className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.76rem' }}>
+                  {row.events.length === 0
+                    ? <span className="dim">none</span>
+                    : row.events.map(eventLabel).join(', ')}
+                </td>
+                <td className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.76rem' }}>{row.channel_ref || <span className="dim">unset</span>}</td>
+                <td className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.76rem' }}>
+                  {row.enabled ? 'Enabled' : 'Disabled'}
+                  {row.members_ack && (
+                    <span className="dim" style={{ display: 'block' }}>
+                      members-only destination confirmed
+                      {row.members_ack_username ? ` by ${row.members_ack_username}` : ''}
+                    </span>
+                  )}
+                </td>
+                <td>
+                  <button type="button" className="btn-ghost" disabled={busy} onClick={() => setDraft(draftFrom(row))}>Edit</button>
+                  <button type="button" className="btn-ghost" disabled={busy} onClick={() => remove(row)}>Remove</button>
+                </td>
+              </tr>
+            ))}
+          </tbody>
+        </table>
+      )}
+
+      {!draft && (
+        <div style={{ marginTop: 12 }}>
+          {!hasDefault && (
+            <button type="button" className="btn-ghost" onClick={() => setDraft(blankDraft(null))}>
+              Set a default for all Teams
+            </button>
+          )}
+          {available.length > 0 && (
+            <button type="button" className="btn-ghost" onClick={() => setDraft(blankDraft(available[0].id))}>
+              Add a per-Team override
+            </button>
+          )}
+        </div>
+      )}
+
+      {draft && (
+        <div style={{ marginTop: 18, borderTop: '1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.12)', paddingTop: 16 }}>
+          <label style={{ display: 'block', marginBottom: 12 }}>
+            <span className="field-label">Applies to</span>
+            <select
+              className="select"
+              value={draft.teamId === null ? 'default' : String(draft.teamId)}
+              onChange={(e) => setDraft({ ...draft, teamId: e.target.value === 'default' ? null : Number(e.target.value) })}
+            >
+              <option value="default">All Teams (default)</option>
+              {teams.map((t) => (
+                <option key={t.id} value={t.id}>{t.display_name_override || t.name}</option>
+              ))}
+            </select>
+          </label>
+
+          <span className="field-label">Events to send</span>
+          {config.events.map((event) => (
+            <label key={event.id} style={{ display: 'block', marginTop: 6 }}>
+              <input
+                type="checkbox"
+                checked={draft.events.includes(event.id)}
+                onChange={() => setDraft((d) => toggleEvent(d, event.id))}
+                style={{ marginRight: 8 }}
+              />
+              <span className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>{eventLabel(event.id)}</span>
+              {event.membersOnly && (
+                <span className="dim sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.72rem', marginLeft: 8 }}>members-only content</span>
+              )}
+            </label>
+          ))}
+
+          <label style={{ display: 'block', marginTop: 14 }}>
+            <span className="field-label">Channel id</span>
+            <input
+              className="input"
+              value={draft.channelRef}
+              // Changing the channel drops a standing acknowledgement in the SAME
+              // place the server does. Leaving the tick showing while the server
+              // has already decided to clear it would let an operator repoint a row
+              // at a public channel and believe the confirmation still covered it.
+              onChange={(e) => setDraft((d) => setChannel(d, e.target.value))}
+              placeholder="1024839201048392010"
+              style={{ maxWidth: 280 }}
+            />
+            <span className="sans dim" style={{ display: 'block', marginTop: 6, fontSize: '0.76rem' }}>
+              Right-click a channel in {config.platform} and copy its id. Changing it asks you to confirm
+              the new channel’s audience again.
+            </span>
+          </label>
+
+          <label style={{ display: 'block', marginTop: 14 }}>
+            <input
+              type="checkbox"
+              checked={draft.enabled}
+              onChange={(e) => setDraft({ ...draft, enabled: e.target.checked })}
+              style={{ marginRight: 8 }}
+            />
+            <span className="field-label" style={{ display: 'inline' }}>Enabled</span>
+          </label>
+
+          {draft.membersAck && (
+            <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.76rem', marginTop: 10 }}>
+              You have confirmed this channel is restricted to the Team’s members.{' '}
+              <button type="button" className="btn-ghost" onClick={() => setDraft({ ...draft, membersAck: false })}>
+                Withdraw
+              </button>
+            </p>
+          )}
+
+          <div style={{ marginTop: 16 }}>
+            <button type="button" className="btn" disabled={busy} onClick={save}>Save</button>
+            <button type="button" className="btn-ghost" disabled={busy} onClick={() => { setDraft(null); setError('') }}>Cancel</button>
+          </div>
+        </div>
+      )}
+
+      {dialog && (
+        <div style={{ marginTop: 18, border: '1px solid #e0b877', padding: 14, borderRadius: 4 }}>
+          <h3 className="display" style={{ fontSize: '0.95rem', marginTop: 0 }}>Confirm the destination’s audience</h3>
+          {ACK_TEXT.map((line) => (
+            <p key={line} className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.8rem' }}>{line}</p>
+          ))}
+          <button
+            type="button"
+            className="btn"
+            disabled={busy}
+            onClick={() => persist({ ...dialog, membersAck: true })}
+          >
+            I confirm the channel is members-only
+          </button>
+          <button type="button" className="btn-ghost" disabled={busy} onClick={() => setDialog(null)}>Cancel</button>
+        </div>
+      )}
+    </section>
+  )
+}

client/src/routes/admin/views/TeamVoice.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+import { useCallback, useEffect, useState } from 'react'
+import { api } from '../../../api/client.js'
+import {
+  stateLabel, enableBlockedReason, roleHeadroom, removalCountdown,
+  parseStaffRoles, formatStaffRoles, statusSummary,
+} from '../../../lib/teamVoice.js'
+
+// Team voice channels (TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9).
+//
+// Named for the Team concern and placed under Teams beside the notification
+// bridge, for the reason that panel gives: phase 10 replaces "Discord" with
+// whatever the capability registry declares, and what should change then is what
+// fills this panel rather than where an operator goes to find it.
+//
+// **The preflight is the first thing on the page, not a diagnostic.** §7.3
+// assumed the bot could manage channels and roles; nothing in this project has
+// ever checked, because the operator invites the bot by hand and no invite URL
+// with a permission integer exists anywhere in the tree. An operator whose bot
+// lacks Manage Roles otherwise has a screen full of controls that cannot work,
+// and finds out one Team at a time from a column of identical errors.
+
+export default function TeamVoice() {
+  const [config, setConfig] = useState(null)
+  const [draft, setDraft] = useState(null)
+  const [error, setError] = useState('')
+  const [notice, setNotice] = useState('')
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+
+  const load = useCallback(async () => {
+    setError('')
+    try {
+      const cfg = await api.admin.teamVoice()
+      setConfig(cfg)
+      setDraft({
+        enabled: cfg.settings.enabled,
+        minMembers: cfg.settings.minMembers,
+        graceDays: cfg.settings.graceDays,
+        staffRoles: formatStaffRoles(cfg.settings.staffRoles),
+      })
+    } catch (err) {
+      // A moderator never reaches this panel — the admin nav does not render it —
+      // so a 403 means the role changed underneath an open tab.
+      setError(err.status === 403
+        ? 'Only an admin can configure Team voice channels.'
+        : (err.message || 'Could not load the voice configuration.'))
+    }
+  }, [])
+
+  useEffect(() => { load() }, [load])
+
+  if (!config || !draft) {
+    return (
+      <section style={{ marginTop: 34, maxWidth: 760 }}>
+        <h2 className="display" style={{ fontSize: '1.05rem', marginBottom: 4 }}>Voice channels</h2>
+        {error && <p className="sans" style={{ color: '#e08b77', fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>{error}</p>}
+      </section>
+    )
+  }
+
+  const blocked = enableBlockedReason(config.preflight)
+  const headroom = roleHeadroom(config.preflight)
+
+  async function save() {
+    const { roles, invalid } = parseStaffRoles(draft.staffRoles)
+    if (invalid.length > 0) {
+      setError(`Not a role id: ${invalid.join(', ')}. Copy role ids from Discord with Developer Mode on.`)
+      return
+    }
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError('')
+    setNotice('')
+    try {
+      await api.admin.saveTeamVoice({
+        enabled: draft.enabled,
+        minMembers: Number(draft.minMembers),
+        graceDays: Number(draft.graceDays),
+        staffRoles: roles,
+      })
+      setNotice('Saved.')
+      await load()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not save.')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  async function runPass() {
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError('')
+    setNotice('')
+    try {
+      const result = await api.admin.teamVoicePass()
+      // A pass that refused says why, and that is the useful answer far more often
+      // than a count is — "stale projection" and "synced 0" look identical in a
+      // summary and mean completely different things.
+      setNotice(result.ran
+        ? `Synced ${result.synced}, created ${result.created}, scheduled ${result.scheduled}, removed ${result.removed}, failed ${result.failed}.`
+        : `Nothing was done: ${result.reason}`)
+      await load()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not run a pass.')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  async function remove(row) {
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError('')
+    try {
+      await api.admin.removeTeamVoice(row.teamId)
+      setNotice('Removed.')
+      await load()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not remove.')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <section style={{ marginTop: 34, maxWidth: 760 }}>
+      <h2 className="display" style={{ fontSize: '1.05rem', marginBottom: 4 }}>Voice channels</h2>
+      <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.78rem', margin: '0 0 14px' }}>
+        Give each Team a {config.platform} voice channel of its own. Access is granted with a role per
+        Team, so members of a Team can see and join their channel and nobody else can. Members need a
+        linked {config.platform} account and must be in the guild.
+      </p>
+
+      {blocked && (
+        <p className="sans" style={{ color: '#e0b877', fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>
+          {blocked} Voice channels cannot be switched on until that is fixed.
+        </p>
+      )}
+
+      {headroom && (
+        <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.78rem' }}>
+          {headroom.used} of {headroom.cap} {config.platform} roles used in this guild
+          {headroom.exhausted
+            ? ' — no room for another Team.'
+            : headroom.tight
+              ? ` — room for about ${headroom.free} more Teams.`
+              : '.'}
+        </p>
+      )}
+
+      {error && <p className="sans" style={{ color: '#e08b77', fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>{error}</p>}
+      {notice && <p className="sans" style={{ color: '#8fbf7a', fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>{notice}</p>}
+
+      <p className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.8rem' }}>{statusSummary(config.settings, config.rows)}</p>
+
+      <div style={{ marginTop: 14, borderTop: '1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.12)', paddingTop: 16 }}>
+        <label className="sans" style={{ display: 'block', marginBottom: 12, fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>
+          <input
+            type="checkbox"
+            checked={draft.enabled}
+            disabled={busy || (!!blocked && !draft.enabled)}
+            onChange={(e) => setDraft({ ...draft, enabled: e.target.checked })}
+          />
+          {' '}Provision voice channels for Teams
+        </label>
+
+        <label style={{ display: 'block', marginBottom: 12 }}>
+          <span className="field-label">Minimum members</span>
+          <input
+            className="input"
+            type="number"
+            min="1"
+            max="10000"
+            value={draft.minMembers}
+            disabled={busy}
+            onChange={(e) => setDraft({ ...draft, minMembers: e.target.value })}
+          />
+          <span className="sans dim" style={{ display: 'block', fontSize: '0.74rem' }}>
+            Every active member counts, whether or not they have linked an account.
+          </span>
+        </label>
+
+        <label style={{ display: 'block', marginBottom: 12 }}>
+          <span className="field-label">Grace window (days)</span>
+          <input
+            className="input"
+            type="number"
+            min="0"
+            max="90"
+            value={draft.graceDays}
+            disabled={busy}
+            onChange={(e) => setDraft({ ...draft, graceDays: e.target.value })}
+          />
+          <span className="sans dim" style={{ display: 'block', fontSize: '0.74rem' }}>
+            How long a Team keeps its channel after it stops qualifying. A Team that recovers inside the
+            window keeps the same channel; zero removes it on the next pass.
+          </span>
+        </label>
+
+        <label style={{ display: 'block', marginBottom: 12 }}>
+          <span className="field-label">Staff roles</span>
+          <input
+            className="input"
+            type="text"
+            value={draft.staffRoles}
+            disabled={busy}
+            placeholder="role id, role id"
+            onChange={(e) => setDraft({ ...draft, staffRoles: e.target.value })}
+          />
+          <span className="sans dim" style={{ display: 'block', fontSize: '0.74rem' }}>
+            Roles that can see and join every Team’s channel. Guild administrators already can, so this
+            is for staff who are not administrators. Leave empty if there are none.
+          </span>
+        </label>
+
+        <button type="button" className="btn" disabled={busy} onClick={save}>Save</button>
+        <button type="button" className="btn-ghost" disabled={busy} onClick={runPass}>Sync now</button>
+      </div>
+
+      {config.rows.length > 0 && (
+        <table className="table" style={{ marginTop: 18 }}>
+          <thead>
+            <tr><th>Team</th><th>Members</th><th>Channel</th><th>State</th><th /></tr>
+          </thead>
+          <tbody>
+            {config.rows.map((row) => (
+              <tr key={row.teamId}>
+                <td>{row.teamName}</td>
+                <td className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.76rem' }}>{row.memberCount}</td>
+                <td className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.76rem' }}>
+                  {row.channelRef || <span className="dim">none</span>}
+                </td>
+                <td className="sans" style={{ fontSize: '0.76rem' }}>
+                  {stateLabel(row.state)}
+                  {removalCountdown(row) && (
+                    <span className="dim" style={{ display: 'block' }}>{removalCountdown(row)}</span>
+                  )}
+                  {row.lastError && (
+                    <span style={{ display: 'block', color: '#e08b77' }}>{row.lastError}</span>
+                  )}
+                </td>
+                <td>
+                  <button type="button" className="btn-ghost" disabled={busy} onClick={() => remove(row)}>Remove</button>
+                </td>
+              </tr>
+            ))}
+          </tbody>
+        </table>
+      )}
+
+      {config.lastPass && config.lastPass.at && (
+        <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.74rem', marginTop: 10 }}>
+          Last pass {new Date(config.lastPass.at).toLocaleString()}
+          {config.lastPass.ran ? '' : ` — nothing was done: ${config.lastPass.reason}`}
+        </p>
+      )}
+    </section>
+  )
+}

client/src/routes/admin/views/TeamsAdmin.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,392 @@
+import { useCallback, useEffect, useState } from 'react'
+import { Loading, ErrorState } from '../../../components/PageState.jsx'
+import { dateTime } from '../../../lib/format.js'
+import {
+  freshnessOf, statusOf, gateLabelFor, describeRequest, leadershipOf, GATED_NOTE,
+} from '../../../lib/teamAdmin.js'
+import { useAuth } from '../../../contexts/AuthContext.jsx'
+import { api } from '../../../api/client.js'
+import TeamIntegrations from './TeamIntegrations.jsx'
+import TeamVoice from './TeamVoice.jsx'
+
+// Admin → Teams (docs/website/TEAMS.md §2.4, §2.8, §2.9).
+//
+// Three panels, in the order an operator needs them:
+//
+//   1. **Sync state**, verbatim, including the last error. The screen's first job
+//      is to make "the shard has no Teams" and "core has not been able to ask for
+//      two hours" impossible to confuse — they render almost identically
+//      otherwise, and one is fine while the other is an outage.
+//   2. **The review queue** — Teams auto-hidden because their name matched the
+//      impersonation list, each showing which term matched.
+//   3. **The approval queue** — what moderators have asked to publish.
+//
+// Everything that decides what a row SAYS lives in lib/teamAdmin.js, which is
+// plain JS and has tests; this file renders it.
+
+const TONE_COLOR = { ok: '#7fd0a4', warn: 'var(--accent)', bad: '#d98b84', idle: 'var(--muted)' }
+
+function Pill({ tone, children }) {
+  return (
+    <span
+      className="badge"
+      style={{ color: TONE_COLOR[tone] || 'var(--muted)', borderColor: 'var(--line)', background: 'var(--panel-flat)' }}
+    >
+      {children}
+    </span>
+  )
+}
+
+// ── Sync state ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+function SyncPanel({ sync, syncState, onResync, busy }) {
+  const freshness = freshnessOf(sync)
+  return (
+    <section className="panel" style={{ marginBottom: '1.5rem' }}>
+      <div style={{ display: 'flex', alignItems: 'center', gap: '.75rem', flexWrap: 'wrap' }}>
+        <h2 style={{ margin: 0 }}>Sync</h2>
+        <Pill tone={freshness.tone}>{freshness.label}</Pill>
+        <button type="button" className="btn" onClick={onResync} disabled={busy || !sync.configured}>
+          {busy ? 'Resyncing…' : 'Resync now'}
+        </button>
+      </div>
+      <p className="muted" style={{ marginTop: '.5rem' }}>{freshness.detail}</p>
+
+      {syncState && (
+        <dl className="kv" style={{ marginTop: '.75rem' }}>
+          <dt>Module</dt><dd>{syncState.moduleId}</dd>
+          <dt>Last attempt</dt><dd>{dateTime(syncState.lastAttemptAt) || 'never'}</dd>
+          <dt>Last success</dt><dd>{dateTime(syncState.lastSuccessAt) || 'never'}</dd>
+          <dt>Consecutive failures</dt><dd>{syncState.consecutiveFailures}</dd>
+          {syncState.lastError && (
+            <>
+              {/* Verbatim. An operator debugging a stale projection needs what the
+                  provider actually said, not a friendlier paraphrase of it. */}
+              <dt>Last error</dt>
+              <dd style={{ color: TONE_COLOR.bad }}>{syncState.lastError}</dd>
+            </>
+          )}
+          {syncState.pendingEmptySince && (
+            <>
+              <dt>Empty answer held</dt>
+              <dd>
+                since {dateTime(syncState.pendingEmptySince)} — an authoritative but empty list is
+                applied only if the next answer agrees.
+              </dd>
+            </>
+          )}
+        </dl>
+      )}
+    </section>
+  )
+}
+
+// ── The reserved-name review queue ─────────────────────────────────────────
+
+function ReviewQueue({ rows, role, onAct, busy }) {
+  if (!rows.length) return null
+  return (
+    <section className="panel" style={{ marginBottom: '1.5rem' }}>
+      <h2>Names to review</h2>
+      <p className="muted">
+        These Teams are hidden from every public surface because their name matched a reserved term.
+        They work normally for their own members. {GATED_NOTE}
+      </p>
+      <table className="table">
+        <thead>
+          <tr><th>Name</th><th>Matched</th><th>Members</th><th>Created</th><th /></tr>
+        </thead>
+        <tbody>
+          {rows.map((row) => (
+            <tr key={row.id}>
+              <td>{row.name}</td>
+              <td><Pill tone="bad">{row.hidden_term}</Pill></td>
+              <td>{row.member_count}</td>
+              <td>{dateTime(row.created_at)}</td>
+              <td>
+                <button type="button" className="btn" disabled={busy} onClick={() => onAct(row.id, 'unhide')}>
+                  {gateLabelFor(role, 'Publish')}
+                </button>
+              </td>
+            </tr>
+          ))}
+        </tbody>
+      </table>
+    </section>
+  )
+}
+
+// ── The approval queue ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+function RequestQueue({ rows, role, onDecide, busy }) {
+  if (!rows.length) return null
+  const canDecide = role === 'admin'
+  return (
+    <section className="panel" style={{ marginBottom: '1.5rem' }}>
+      <h2>Awaiting approval</h2>
+      <p className="muted">
+        {canDecide
+          ? 'Approving publishes the name; rejecting keeps the record and changes nothing.'
+          : 'Only an admin can decide these. Your own requests stay here until one does.'}
+      </p>
+      <ul className="list">
+        {rows.map((row) => (
+          <li key={row.id} style={{ display: 'flex', gap: '.75rem', alignItems: 'center', flexWrap: 'wrap' }}>
+            <span>{describeRequest(row)}</span>
+            <span className="muted">{dateTime(row.requested_at)}</span>
+            {row.reason && <span className="muted">“{row.reason}”</span>}
+            {canDecide && (
+              <>
+                <button type="button" className="btn" disabled={busy} onClick={() => onDecide(row.id, 'approved')}>
+                  Approve
+                </button>
+                <button type="button" className="btn" disabled={busy} onClick={() => onDecide(row.id, 'rejected')}>
+                  Reject
+                </button>
+              </>
+            )}
+          </li>
+        ))}
+      </ul>
+    </section>
+  )
+}
+
+// ── One Team ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+function TeamRow({ team, role, onAct, busy, onLedger }) {
+  const status = statusOf(team)
+  return (
+    <tr>
+      <td>
+        {team.displayName}
+        {team.displayNameOverride && (
+          <div className="muted" style={{ fontSize: '.85em' }}>
+            shown instead of “{team.name}”
+          </div>
+        )}
+      </td>
+      <td><Pill tone={status.tone}>{status.label}</Pill></td>
+      <td>{team.memberCount}</td>
+      <td>{team.linkedCount}</td>
+      <td>{team.onlineCount}</td>
+      <td className="muted">{dateTime(team.rosterSyncedAt) || 'never'}</td>
+      <td>
+        {team.status === 'active' && (team.hidden
+          ? (
+            <button type="button" className="btn" disabled={busy} onClick={() => onAct(team.id, 'unhide')}>
+              {gateLabelFor(role, 'Publish')}
+            </button>
+          )
+          : (
+            <button type="button" className="btn" disabled={busy} onClick={() => onAct(team.id, 'hide')}>
+              Hide
+            </button>
+          ))}
+        <button type="button" className="btn" onClick={() => onLedger(team)} style={{ marginLeft: 6 }}>
+          Forum log
+        </button>
+      </td>
+    </tr>
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * One Team's forum moderation ledger (TEAMS.md §5.3).
+ *
+ * The route and the API method have existed since phase 4 and nothing rendered
+ * them, which made the ledger a table only a DB client could read. The column
+ * that earns the screen is `actorRole`: it records WHICH authority was exercised,
+ * so a leader's ordinary housekeeping stays distinguishable from a staff
+ * intervention after the fact.
+ *
+ * **This is deliberately not merged with the site's mod_actions/appeals pair.**
+ * That one is Discord-sanction-shaped and bot-owned; routing a guild leader
+ * locking a thread through it would make ordinary housekeeping an appealable
+ * sanction with a reversal path into the bot. Every STAFF-exercised action here
+ * additionally writes activity_log, so the site's accountability trail sees it —
+ * the two are cross-referenced, not merged.
+ */
+function ForumLedger({ team, onClose }) {
+  const [rows, setRows] = useState(null)
+  const [error, setError] = useState('')
+
+  useEffect(() => {
+    let active = true
+    api.admin.teamForumModeration(team.id)
+      // `{ entries }`, and the rows are the ledger table's own snake_case
+      // columns — this endpoint serves them unmapped, unlike the Team payloads
+      // above it. Reading them as they are, rather than accepting three possible
+      // shapes, is what makes a change to that endpoint fail here instead of
+      // rendering an empty table.
+      .then((res) => { if (active) setRows(res.entries) })
+      .catch((err) => { if (active) setError(err.message || 'Could not load the forum log.') })
+    return () => { active = false }
+  }, [team.id])
+
+  return (
+    <section className="panel">
+      <header style={{ display: 'flex', justifyContent: 'space-between', alignItems: 'baseline' }}>
+        <h2>Forum log — {team.displayName}</h2>
+        <button type="button" className="btn" onClick={onClose}>Close</button>
+      </header>
+      {error && <ErrorState message={error} />}
+      {!rows && !error && <Loading />}
+      {rows && rows.length === 0 && <p className="muted">Nothing has been moderated in this forum.</p>}
+      {rows && rows.length > 0 && (
+        <table className="table">
+          <thead>
+            <tr>
+              <th>When</th><th>Action</th><th>Target</th><th>By</th><th>As</th><th>Reason</th>
+            </tr>
+          </thead>
+          <tbody>
+            {rows.map((r) => (
+              <tr key={r.id}>
+                <td className="muted">{dateTime(r.created_at)}</td>
+                <td>{r.action}</td>
+                <td className="muted">{r.target_type} #{r.target_id}</td>
+                <td>{r.actor_username || '—'}</td>
+                <td>
+                  {/* The distinction the whole ledger exists to preserve. */}
+                  <Pill tone={r.actor_role === 'staff' ? 'warn' : 'ok'}>{r.actor_role}</Pill>
+                </td>
+                <td className="muted">{r.reason || '—'}</td>
+              </tr>
+            ))}
+          </tbody>
+        </table>
+      )}
+    </section>
+  )
+}
+
+// ── The screen ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+export default function TeamsAdmin() {
+  const { user } = useAuth()
+  const role = user ? user.role : null
+
+  const [data, setData] = useState(null)
+  const [review, setReview] = useState([])
+  const [requests, setRequests] = useState([])
+  const [error, setError] = useState('')
+  const [notice, setNotice] = useState('')
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+  const [ledgerTeam, setLedgerTeam] = useState(null)
+
+  const load = useCallback(async () => {
+    setError('')
+    try {
+      const [teams, reviewQueue, requestQueue] = await Promise.all([
+        api.admin.listTeams(),
+        api.admin.teamReviewQueue(),
+        api.admin.teamRequests('pending'),
+      ])
+      setData(teams)
+      setReview(reviewQueue.teams || [])
+      setRequests(requestQueue.requests || [])
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not load Teams.')
+    }
+  }, [])
+
+  useEffect(() => { load() }, [load])
+
+  async function run(fn, pendingMessage) {
+    setBusy(true)
+    setNotice('')
+    setError('')
+    try {
+      const result = await fn()
+      // The server decides whether an action applied or was filed, from the
+      // caller's live role. Saying so plainly is what stops a moderator thinking
+      // nothing happened.
+      if (result && result.pending) setNotice(pendingMessage)
+      await load()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'That did not work.')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  const act = (id, action) => run(
+    () => (action === 'hide' ? api.admin.hideTeam(id) : api.admin.unhideTeam(id)),
+    'Filed for approval. Nothing has changed publicly until an admin approves it.',
+  )
+
+  const decide = (id, status) => run(
+    () => api.admin.decideTeamRequest(id, status),
+    '',
+  )
+
+  const resync = () => run(async () => {
+    const result = await api.admin.resyncTeams()
+    // A refusal is the normal, designed outcome when the provider cannot answer,
+    // so it is reported as a result rather than thrown as an error.
+    if (!result.ok) setError(`Resync refused: ${result.reason}. Nothing was changed.`)
+    else if (result.quarantined) {
+      setNotice('The provider answered with an empty list. It is being held for confirmation, not applied.')
+    }
+    return null
+  }, '')
+
+  if (error && !data) return <ErrorState message={error} />
+  if (!data) return <Loading />
+
+  return (
+    <div>
+      <h1>Teams</h1>
+      {error && <ErrorState message={error} />}
+      {notice && <p className="notice">{notice}</p>}
+
+      {ledgerTeam && <ForumLedger team={ledgerTeam} onClose={() => setLedgerTeam(null)} />}
+
+      {/* Admin-only, matching the server (§7.2). Rendered for a moderator it would
+          be a panel every action in fails 403 — the role gate is the server's, and
+          this is only how the screen agrees with it. */}
+      {role === 'admin' && <TeamIntegrations />}
+      {role === 'admin' && <TeamVoice />}
+
+      <SyncPanel sync={data} syncState={data.syncState} onResync={resync} busy={busy} />
+      <ReviewQueue rows={review} role={role} onAct={act} busy={busy} />
+      <RequestQueue rows={requests} role={role} onDecide={decide} busy={busy} />
+
+      <section className="panel">
+        <h2>All Teams</h2>
+        {!data.teams.length && (
+          <p className="muted">
+            {data.configured
+              ? 'No Teams in the projection yet.'
+              : 'No installed module supplies Teams, so there is nothing to show.'}
+          </p>
+        )}
+        {data.teams.length > 0 && (
+          <table className="table">
+            <thead>
+              <tr>
+                <th>Name</th><th>Status</th><th>Members</th><th>Linked</th><th>Online</th>
+                <th>Roster confirmed</th><th />
+              </tr>
+            </thead>
+            <tbody>
+              {data.teams.map((team) => (
+                <TeamRow
+                  key={team.id}
+                  team={team}
+                  role={role}
+                  onAct={act}
+                  busy={busy}
+                  onLedger={setLedgerTeam}
+                />
+              ))}
+            </tbody>
+          </table>
+        )}
+      </section>
+    </div>
+  )
+}
+
+export { leadershipOf }

client/src/routes/player/PlayerNotifications.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+import { useCallback, useEffect, useState } from 'react'
+import { Loading, ErrorState } from '../../components/PageState.jsx'
+import { api } from '../../api/client.js'
+
+// The account's notification settings (TEAMS.md §6.3/§6.4, phase 6).
+//
+// **This screen did not exist before phase 6, and that was the phase's first
+// finding.** §6.3 says the per-Team mute list is "surfaced under the existing
+// notification settings screen" — there was no such screen on the web. The stream
+// catalog and the per-stream subscriptions have been built and shipped since M7,
+// with the Android app as their only consumer; a browser could not see them at
+// all. That is tolerable for push, which needs the app anyway. It is not tolerable
+// for email, whose whole reason for existing (§6.4) is the web-only user who runs
+// neither the app nor Discord — so the sink and the screen to configure it had to
+// arrive together.
+//
+// Three blocks, in the order a user actually reasons about them: what kinds of
+// thing to be told about, then which Teams, then whether any of it should reach a
+// mailbox.
+
+const EMAIL_MODES = [
+  { value: 'off', label: 'No email' },
+  { value: 'digest', label: 'Daily digest' },
+  { value: 'immediate', label: 'Every post' },
+]
+
+// Streams whose scoping lives in this page's second block rather than in the
+// first. Shown as a group so a user does not toggle `team.forum.post` off site-
+// wide when what they meant was "not this one guild".
+const isTeamStream = (id) => String(id).startsWith('team.')
+
+function Section({ title, hint, children }) {
+  return (
+    <section style={{ borderTop: '1px solid var(--line-soft)', paddingTop: 26, marginTop: 26 }}>
+      <h2 className="display" style={{ marginTop: 0, fontSize: '1.15rem', color: 'var(--head)' }}>{title}</h2>
+      {hint && <p className="sans dim" style={{ margin: '0 0 14px', fontSize: '0.86rem' }}>{hint}</p>}
+      {children}
+    </section>
+  )
+}
+
+function Note({ msg, error }) {
+  if (!msg && !error) return null
+  return (
+    <p className="sans" style={{ margin: '10px 0 0', color: error ? '#d98b84' : '#7fd0a4', fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>
+      {error || msg}
+    </p>
+  )
+}
+
+// ── What to be told about ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+function Streams({ streams, subscribed, onSave, busy, msg, error }) {
+  const [set, setSet] = useState(() => new Set(subscribed))
+  useEffect(() => { setSet(new Set(subscribed)) }, [subscribed])
+
+  const toggle = (id) => {
+    const next = new Set(set)
+    if (next.has(id)) next.delete(id)
+    else next.add(id)
+    setSet(next)
+  }
+
+  const team = streams.filter((s) => isTeamStream(s.id))
+  const rest = streams.filter((s) => !isTeamStream(s.id))
+
+  const row = (s) => (
+    <label key={s.id} className="sans" style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 10, alignItems: 'flex-start', fontSize: '0.92rem' }}>
+      <input type="checkbox" checked={set.has(s.id)} onChange={() => toggle(s.id)} style={{ marginTop: 3 }} />
+      <span>
+        <span style={{ color: 'var(--ink)' }}>{s.label}</span>
+        {s.description && <span className="dim" style={{ display: 'block', fontSize: '0.82rem' }}>{s.description}</span>}
+      </span>
+    </label>
+  )
+
+  return (
+    <Section
+      title="What to notify me about"
+      hint="Applies to every device you have signed in on. Notifications are delivered to the app; the website itself does not pop anything up."
+    >
+      <div style={{ display: 'grid', gap: 12 }}>{rest.map(row)}</div>
+      {team.length > 0 && (
+        <>
+          <h3 className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.74rem', textTransform: 'uppercase', letterSpacing: '0.06em', margin: '20px 0 10px' }}>
+            Teams
+          </h3>
+          <div style={{ display: 'grid', gap: 12 }}>{team.map(row)}</div>
+        </>
+      )}
+      <div style={{ marginTop: 18 }}>
+        <button type="button" className="btn btn-primary btn-sq" disabled={busy} onClick={() => onSave([...set])}>
+          {busy ? 'Saving…' : 'Save'}
+        </button>
+      </div>
+      <Note msg={msg} error={error} />
+    </Section>
+  )
+}
+
+// ── Which Teams, and whether by email ──────────────────────────────────────
+
+function Teams({ teams, onSave, busy, msg, error }) {
+  const [rows, setRows] = useState(teams)
+  useEffect(() => { setRows(teams) }, [teams])
+
+  const patch = (teamId, change) =>
+    setRows((rs) => rs.map((r) => (r.teamId === teamId ? { ...r, ...change } : r)))
+
+  if (rows.length === 0) {
+    return (
+      <Section title="Teams">
+        <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.9rem', margin: 0 }}>
+          You are not in a team, and nobody has given you access to a team forum. There is nothing to
+          configure here yet.
+        </p>
+      </Section>
+    )
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <Section
+      title="Teams"
+      hint="Muting a team silences all four team notifications for it, without changing anything for your other teams. Email is off until you turn it on."
+    >
+      <div style={{ overflowX: 'auto' }}>
+        <table style={{ width: '100%', borderCollapse: 'collapse' }}>
+          <thead>
+            <tr className="sans dim" style={{ textAlign: 'left', fontSize: '0.72rem', textTransform: 'uppercase', letterSpacing: '0.06em' }}>
+              <th style={{ padding: '8px 10px' }}>Team</th>
+              <th style={{ padding: '8px 10px' }}>Notifications</th>
+              <th style={{ padding: '8px 10px' }}>Email</th>
+            </tr>
+          </thead>
+          <tbody>
+            {rows.map((t) => (
+              <tr key={t.teamId} style={{ borderTop: '1px solid var(--line-soft)' }}>
+                <td className="sans" style={{ padding: '10px', color: 'var(--ink)' }}>
+                  {t.name}
+                  {/* An archived Team is still listed when a preference exists for
+                      it, so a mute does not silently vanish when a guild disbands
+                      and reappear if it re-forms under the same name. */}
+                  {t.archived && <span className="dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.78rem' }}> · archived</span>}
+                </td>
+                <td style={{ padding: '10px' }}>
+                  <label className="sans" style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 8, alignItems: 'center', fontSize: '0.88rem' }}>
+                    <input type="checkbox" checked={!t.muted} onChange={() => patch(t.teamId, { muted: !t.muted })} />
+                    <span className="dim">{t.muted ? 'Muted' : 'On'}</span>
+                  </label>
+                </td>
+                <td style={{ padding: '10px' }}>
+                  <select
+                    className="input"
+                    value={t.emailMode}
+                    onChange={(e) => patch(t.teamId, { emailMode: e.target.value })}
+                    style={{ fontSize: '0.88rem' }}
+                  >
+                    {EMAIL_MODES.map((m) => <option key={m.value} value={m.value}>{m.label}</option>)}
+                  </select>
+                </td>
+              </tr>
+            ))}
+          </tbody>
+        </table>
+      </div>
+      <div style={{ marginTop: 18 }}>
+        <button type="button" className="btn btn-primary btn-sq" disabled={busy} onClick={() => onSave(rows)}>
+          {busy ? 'Saving…' : 'Save'}
+        </button>
+      </div>
+      <Note msg={msg} error={error} />
+    </Section>
+  )
+}
+
+// ── Page ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+export default function PlayerNotifications() {
+  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true)
+  const [error, setError] = useState('')
+  const [streams, setStreams] = useState([])
+  const [subscribed, setSubscribed] = useState([])
+  const [teams, setTeams] = useState([])
+  const [saving, setSaving] = useState({ streams: false, teams: false })
+  const [notes, setNotes] = useState({ streams: '', teams: '', streamsError: '', teamsError: '' })
+
+  const load = useCallback(async () => {
+    setLoading(true)
+    try {
+      // Three reads in parallel: the catalog is boot-fixed, the subscriptions and
+      // the Team list are this user's. None depends on another.
+      const [cat, subs, prefs] = await Promise.all([
+        api.notificationStreams(),
+        api.notificationSubscriptions(),
+        api.teamNotificationPrefs(),
+      ])
+      setStreams(cat.streams || [])
+      setSubscribed(subs.streams || [])
+      setTeams(prefs.teams || [])
+      setError('')
+    } catch {
+      setError('Could not load your notification settings.')
+    } finally {
+      setLoading(false)
+    }
+  }, [])
+
+  useEffect(() => { load() }, [load])
+
+  const saveStreams = useCallback(async (ids) => {
+    setSaving((s) => ({ ...s, streams: true }))
+    setNotes((n) => ({ ...n, streams: '', streamsError: '' }))
+    try {
+      const { streams: stored } = await api.setNotificationSubscriptions(ids)
+      setSubscribed(stored || [])
+      setNotes((n) => ({ ...n, streams: 'Saved.' }))
+    } catch {
+      setNotes((n) => ({ ...n, streamsError: 'Could not save that.' }))
+    } finally {
+      setSaving((s) => ({ ...s, streams: false }))
+    }
+  }, [])
+
+  const saveTeams = useCallback(async (rows) => {
+    setSaving((s) => ({ ...s, teams: true }))
+    setNotes((n) => ({ ...n, teams: '', teamsError: '' }))
+    try {
+      // The whole set, every time, and the array is sent even when empty — the
+      // endpoint requires the field (docs/android/PLAN.md §11).
+      const { teams: stored } = await api.setTeamNotificationPrefs(
+        rows.map((t) => ({ teamId: t.teamId, muted: t.muted, emailMode: t.emailMode })),
+      )
+      setTeams(stored || [])
+      setNotes((n) => ({ ...n, teams: 'Saved.' }))
+    } catch {
+      setNotes((n) => ({ ...n, teamsError: 'Could not save that.' }))
+    } finally {
+      setSaving((s) => ({ ...s, teams: false }))
+    }
+  }, [])
+
+  if (loading) return <Loading />
+  if (error) return <ErrorState message={error} />
+
+  return (
+    <div>
+      <p className="sans" style={{ margin: 0, color: 'var(--muted)', fontSize: '0.9rem' }}>
+        Choose what you are told about, and how. Nothing here is on by default except team
+        notifications to the app, which you can mute per team below.
+      </p>
+      <Streams
+        streams={streams}
+        subscribed={subscribed}
+        onSave={saveStreams}
+        busy={saving.streams}
+        msg={notes.streams}
+        error={notes.streamsError}
+      />
+      <Teams
+        teams={teams}
+        onSave={saveTeams}
+        busy={saving.teams}
+        msg={notes.teams}
+        error={notes.teamsError}
+      />
+    </div>
+  )
+}

client/src/routes/player/PlayerPortalLayout.jsx

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ function Icon({ children, size = 16 }) {
 }
 const IconGear = () => <Icon><circle cx="12" cy="12" r="3" /><path d="M12 2v3M12 19v3M2 12h3M19 12h3M4.9 4.9l2.1 2.1M17 17l2.1 2.1M19.1 4.9L17 7M7 17l-2.1 2.1" /></Icon>
 const IconShield = () => <Icon><path d="M12 3l7 3v5c0 5-3.5 8-7 10-3.5-2-7-5-7-10V6z" /><path d="M9 12l2 2 4-4" /></Icon>
+const IconBell = () => <Icon><path d="M18 8a6 6 0 10-12 0c0 7-3 9-3 9h18s-3-2-3-9" /><path d="M13.7 21a2 2 0 01-3.4 0" /></Icon>
 
 // Exported because Admin -> Navigation edits this list. It stays declared here;
 // the editor may only relabel, reorder and hide what it finds (§7). No CORE row
@@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ const IconShield = () => <Icon><path d="M12 3l7 3v5c0 5-3.5 8-7 10-3.5-2-7-5-7-1
 // with `order: 0`.
 export const NAV = [
   { to: '/account/appeals', label: 'Appeals', icon: IconShield },
+  { to: '/account/notifications', label: 'Notifications', icon: IconBell },
   { to: '/account', label: 'Account', end: true, icon: IconGear },
 ]
 
@@ -56,6 +58,7 @@ export const NAV = [
 const TITLES = {
   '/account': 'Account',
   '/account/appeals': 'Appeals',
+  '/account/notifications': 'Notifications',
 }
 
 function moduleTitle(baseNav, pathname) {

client/src/routes/player/Unsubscribe.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+import { useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react'
+import { Link, useParams } from 'react-router-dom'
+import PublicLayout from '../../components/PublicLayout.jsx'
+import PageHeader from '../../components/PageHeader.jsx'
+import { api } from '../../api/client.js'
+
+// The landing page for the unsubscribe link in a Team notification email
+// (TEAMS.md §6.4).
+//
+// **Public, and it must be**: the person reading it is in their mail client, not
+// signed in, and an unsubscribe that first demands a login is one most people do
+// not complete. The token in the path is what stands in for the session.
+//
+// **The page POSTs; the link the user clicked was a GET.** A GET must not mutate —
+// mail clients and security scanners follow links in messages, and one that did
+// would silently mute Teams nobody asked to leave. So the link lands here, this
+// runs one POST, and the API route that shares the path answers GET with a
+// redirect to exactly this page.
+//
+// **It says the same thing whatever the token was.** A page that distinguished a
+// valid token from a forged one would be an oracle for which (user, Team) pairs
+// exist, on a surface with no session behind it. The server always answers 200 and
+// this always says the same sentence.
+
+export default function Unsubscribe() {
+  const { token } = useParams()
+  const [state, setState] = useState('working')
+  // React 18 StrictMode mounts an effect twice in development. The POST is
+  // idempotent (it sets a boolean), so a second call is harmless — but it is
+  // still a second request for no reason, and the guard keeps the network panel
+  // honest for anyone debugging this page.
+  const fired = useRef(false)
+
+  useEffect(() => {
+    if (fired.current) return
+    fired.current = true
+    api.unsubscribeTeam(token)
+      .then(() => setState('done'))
+      // A network failure is the ONE case worth distinguishing, because it is the
+      // one where trying again helps. A rejected token is not: the server does not
+      // tell us, deliberately.
+      .catch(() => setState('failed'))
+  }, [token])
+
+  return (
+    <PublicLayout section="website" shell="narrow">
+      <PageHeader eyebrow="Notifications" title="Unsubscribe" />
+      {state === 'working' && <p className="sans dim">One moment…</p>}
+      {state === 'done' && (
+        <>
+          <p className="sans" style={{ color: 'var(--ink)' }}>
+            You will not receive further notification emails about this team.
+          </p>
+          <p className="sans dim" style={{ fontSize: '0.9rem' }}>
+            This muted the team rather than switching off your account&rsquo;s email, so your other
+            teams are unaffected. You can turn it back on any time under{' '}
+            <Link to="/account/notifications">notification settings</Link>.
+          </p>
+        </>
+      )}
+      {state === 'failed' && (
+        <p className="sans" style={{ color: 'var(--ink)' }}>
+          We could not reach the site to record that. Please try the link again, or change the
+          setting yourself under <Link to="/account/notifications">notification settings</Link>.
+        </p>
+      )}
+    </PublicLayout>
+  )
+}

client/src/styles/theme.css

@@ -298,6 +298,18 @@ button[disabled] {
 }
 
 /* ===== Rich prose (wiki / newsletter body) ===== */
+.forum-embed {
+  /* The image a Team-forum post's URL renders as, in `remote`/`uploads` mode.
+     Emitted by the server (utils/forumHtml.js), never by an author — which is
+     what makes the operator's image policy enforceable. Block, so it sits
+     beneath its link rather than beside it; capped, because a remote image is
+     whatever size its host decided and one post must not blow out the column. */
+  display: block;
+  margin-top: 8px;
+  max-width: 100%;
+  height: auto;
+  border-radius: var(--radius-input);
+}
 .prose {
   color: var(--text);
   font-size: 1.06rem;

client/test/apiClient.test.js

@@ -185,3 +185,70 @@ test('a module id is URL-encoded on the way into the path', async () => {
   await api.admin.disableModule('a b/c')
   assert.equal(calls[0].url, '/api/v1/admin/modules/a%20b%2Fc/disable')
 })
+
+// ── Team forum, phase 5 ("5b") ──────────────────────────────────────────
+//
+// The URL shapes matter more here than they look. Replies hang off a THREAD;
+// edits and post moderation hang off a POST; and the report route hangs off the
+// forum rather than off either, because a report can name a thread, a post or an
+// upload and is not moderation of any of them.
+
+test('a reply hangs off its thread and an edit hangs off its post', async () => {
+  willReply({ body: { ok: true } })
+  await api.teamForumReply('ossuary', 5, { body: 'hi' })
+  assert.equal(calls[0].url, '/api/v1/player/teams/ossuary/forum/threads/5/posts')
+  assert.equal(calls[0].opts.method, 'POST')
+
+  calls = []
+  willReply({ body: { ok: true } })
+  await api.teamForumEditPost('ossuary', 80, { body: 'fixed' })
+  assert.equal(calls[0].url, '/api/v1/player/teams/ossuary/forum/posts/80')
+  // PATCH, not POST: an edit replaces part of a post that already exists, and the
+  // server's route is mounted on the verb.
+  assert.equal(calls[0].opts.method, 'PATCH')
+})
+
+test('post moderation is a different route from thread moderation', async () => {
+  // Not the same route with a target kind, because the two answer to different
+  // rules — `pin` and `lock` mean nothing to a post at all.
+  willReply({ body: { ok: true } })
+  await api.teamForumModeratePost('ossuary', 80, { action: 'hide' })
+  assert.equal(calls[0].url, '/api/v1/player/teams/ossuary/forum/posts/80/moderate')
+
+  calls = []
+  willReply({ body: { ok: true } })
+  await api.teamForumModerate('ossuary', 5, { action: 'pin' })
+  assert.equal(calls[0].url, '/api/v1/player/teams/ossuary/forum/threads/5/moderate')
+})
+
+test('a report goes to the forum, and its queue is under admin moderation', async () => {
+  willReply({ body: { ok: true } })
+  await api.teamForumReport('ossuary', { targetType: 'team_forum_post', targetId: 80, reason: 'abuse' })
+  assert.equal(calls[0].url, '/api/v1/player/teams/ossuary/forum/report')
+  assert.deepEqual(JSON.parse(calls[0].opts.body), {
+    targetType: 'team_forum_post', targetId: 80, reason: 'abuse',
+  })
+
+  // Under /admin/moderation and NOT under /admin/teams: a staffer working a queue
+  // should have one place to work, and there is deliberately no leader-facing
+  // counterpart to this call anywhere in the client (TEAMS.md §5.6).
+  calls = []
+  willReply({ body: { reports: [] } })
+  await api.admin.contentReports({ status: 'open' })
+  assert.equal(calls[0].url, '/api/v1/admin/moderation/reports?status=open')
+})
+
+test('the report queue defaults to the open work rather than to everything', async () => {
+  willReply({ body: { reports: [] } })
+  await api.admin.contentReports()
+  // No query string at all — the server's default is open + reviewing, and a
+  // client that pinned `status=all` here would put the archive in front of a
+  // staffer every time they opened the screen.
+  assert.equal(calls[0].url, '/api/v1/admin/moderation/reports')
+})
+
+test('a Team slug is URL-encoded on every forum path', async () => {
+  willReply({ body: { ok: true } })
+  await api.teamForumReport('a b/c', { targetType: 'team_forum_thread', targetId: 1, reason: 'spam' })
+  assert.equal(calls[0].url, '/api/v1/player/teams/a%20b%2Fc/forum/report')
+})

client/test/moduleRegistry.test.js

@@ -160,6 +160,9 @@ test('the registry object handed to modules exposes the whole surface', () => {
   // window.__rg.registry is the ONLY way a module reaches any of this, so a
   // member missing from the object is a member that does not exist.
   assert.deepEqual(Object.keys(registry).sort(), [
+    // `declareModuleSlot` is the INVERTED direction added in 1.6.0: the module
+    // declares a place on its own page and core fills it (TEAMS.md Part 3).
+    'declareModuleSlot',
     'featureProviderFor',
     'navFor',
     'registerExtension',

client/test/moduleSlots.test.js

@@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ import assert from 'node:assert/strict'
 import {
   registry,
   declareSlot,
+  declareModuleSlot,
+  offerCoreFill,
+  CORE_CONTRIBUTIONS,
+  applyCoreFills,
   registerExtension,
   extensionFor,
   registeredIds,
@@ -92,3 +96,114 @@ test('declareSlot and extensionFor are not on the module-facing registry', () =>
   assert.equal(registry.extensionFor, undefined)
   assert.equal(typeof registry.registerExtension, 'function')
 })
+
+// ── The INVERTED direction: the module declares, core fills ────────────────
+//
+// Added in 1.6.0 for Teams (TEAMS.md Part 3). Teams are a core primitive with no
+// core surface — core owns the tables and the activity feed, the module owns the
+// page and the word "guild" — so the content flows the other way for the first
+// time. The rules below are the ones that direction gets wrong.
+
+const Feed = () => null
+
+test('a module-declared slot must be namespaced under the declaring module', () => {
+  // Enforced rather than conventional: this is the only thing keeping two
+  // modules from claiming the same slot name.
+  assert.throws(() => declareModuleSlot('uo', 'guild.detail'), /must be namespaced/)
+  assert.doesNotThrow(() => declareModuleSlot('uo', 'uo.guild.detail'))
+})
+
+test('core offers a contribution and the module says where it goes', () => {
+  // The ordering that makes this two calls: core's bundle evaluates BEFORE any
+  // module chunk, so at the moment core offers, no module-declared slot exists.
+  offerCoreFill('team.activity', Feed)
+  declareModuleSlot('uo', 'uo.guild.detail', { core: 'team.activity' })
+  assert.equal(extensionFor('uo.guild.detail'), null, 'not before the fills are applied')
+
+  applyCoreFills()
+  assert.equal(extensionFor('uo.guild.detail'), Feed)
+})
+
+test('core names no slot, so a second game gets the same content in its own words', () => {
+  // The defect this replaced: core used to fill three literal `uo.guild.*` names,
+  // which reached exactly one module. Every other game declared a place under its
+  // own id and got an empty page with no error, because a fill nobody declared is
+  // deliberately not an error — the rule that makes an unknown name invisible.
+  offerCoreFill('team.activity', Feed)
+  declareModuleSlot('examplegame', 'examplegame.clan.detail', { core: 'team.activity' })
+  applyCoreFills()
+  assert.equal(extensionFor('examplegame.clan.detail'), Feed)
+})
+
+test('two modules can ask for the same contribution, and both get it', () => {
+  // Core has no reason to care how many places want its feed, and refusing the
+  // second would be core making a layout decision on a page it does not own.
+  offerCoreFill('team.activity', Feed)
+  declareModuleSlot('uo', 'uo.guild.detail', { core: 'team.activity' })
+  declareModuleSlot('uo', 'uo.guild.summary', { core: 'team.activity' })
+  applyCoreFills()
+  assert.equal(extensionFor('uo.guild.detail'), Feed)
+  assert.equal(extensionFor('uo.guild.summary'), Feed)
+})
+
+test('a slot that asks for nothing stays empty', () => {
+  // Optional on purpose: a module may declare a place it fills itself, or one it
+  // is keeping for later. Neither is core's business.
+  offerCoreFill('team.activity', Feed)
+  declareModuleSlot('uo', 'uo.guild.detail')
+  applyCoreFills()
+  assert.equal(extensionFor('uo.guild.detail'), null)
+})
+
+test('asking for a contribution core does not offer THROWS', () => {
+  // The asymmetry with an unfilled slot, and it is deliberate. An unknown
+  // contribution is always a typo or a version skew — core's list is fixed at
+  // build time and the module's coreApi range has already been checked — and the
+  // alternative failure is a page that renders empty forever with nothing logged.
+  assert.throws(
+    () => declareModuleSlot('uo', 'uo.guild.detail', { core: 'team.activityfeed' }),
+    /does not offer/,
+  )
+  assert.ok(CORE_CONTRIBUTIONS['team.activity'], 'the catalogue is exported so a test can name it')
+})
+
+test('a contribution nothing asks for is not an error', () => {
+  // No game module installed. Core offering content for a page that does not
+  // exist is the ordinary case on any deployment, not a misconfiguration.
+  offerCoreFill('team.forum', Feed)
+  assert.doesNotThrow(() => applyCoreFills())
+})
+
+test('a module that fills its own slot first keeps it', () => {
+  const Own = () => null
+  declareModuleSlot('uo', 'uo.guild.detail', { core: 'team.activity' })
+  registerExtension('uo', 'uo.guild.detail', Own)
+  offerCoreFill('team.activity', Feed)
+  applyCoreFills()
+  assert.equal(extensionFor('uo.guild.detail'), Own, 'first fill wins, as everywhere else')
+})
+
+test('a module-declared slot cannot be declared twice', () => {
+  declareModuleSlot('uo', 'uo.guild.detail')
+  assert.throws(() => declareModuleSlot('uo', 'uo.guild.detail'), /already declared/)
+})
+
+test('applying the fills twice does not re-fill or throw', () => {
+  declareModuleSlot('uo', 'uo.guild.detail', { core: 'team.activity' })
+  offerCoreFill('team.activity', Feed)
+  applyCoreFills()
+  assert.doesNotThrow(() => applyCoreFills())
+  assert.equal(extensionFor('uo.guild.detail'), Feed)
+})
+
+test('a non-component contribution is refused at the call site, not at render', () => {
+  assert.throws(() => offerCoreFill('team.activity', 'nope'), /is not a component/)
+})
+
+test('_reset clears pending fills, so one test cannot leak into the next', () => {
+  offerCoreFill('team.activity', Feed)
+  _reset()
+  declareModuleSlot('uo', 'uo.guild.detail', { core: 'team.activity' })
+  applyCoreFills()
+  assert.equal(extensionFor('uo.guild.detail'), null)
+})

client/test/teamActivity.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+// What core's Team activity feed says (client/src/lib/teamActivity.js).
+//
+// The test that earns this file: a projection nobody can tell is stale, and a
+// feed nobody can tell is filtered, both look like complete information. Every
+// case below is about saying which one the reader is looking at.
+//
+// Note the wording assertions avoid core's own noun. The feed renders inside a
+// page a MODULE titled — Guilds today, Clans next — so "this Team" would be
+// core's vocabulary leaking onto a surface that deliberately does not use it.
+import { test } from 'node:test'
+import assert from 'node:assert/strict'
+
+import { activityScopeNote, freshnessNote, groupByDay, relativeTime } from '../src/lib/teamActivity.js'
+
+const NOW = new Date('2026-08-17T12:00:00Z').getTime()
+const ago = (ms) => new Date(NOW - ms).toISOString()
+
+test('a deployment with no provider is not stale, it is uninvolved', () => {
+  assert.equal(freshnessNote({ configured: false }, NOW), null)
+})
+
+test('never synced is a warning, and never reads as a confirmed empty shard', () => {
+  const note = freshnessNote({ configured: true, lastSyncAt: null }, NOW)
+  assert.equal(note.tone, 'warn')
+  assert.match(note.text, /Not yet confirmed/)
+})
+
+test('a stale projection says how old it is and that the game may have moved on', () => {
+  const note = freshnessNote({ configured: true, lastSyncAt: ago(14 * 60_000), stale: true }, NOW)
+  assert.equal(note.tone, 'warn')
+  assert.equal(note.text, 'Last confirmed 14 minutes ago — the game may have moved on.')
+})
+
+test('a current projection is stated quietly', () => {
+  const note = freshnessNote({ configured: true, lastSyncAt: ago(90_000), stale: false }, NOW)
+  assert.equal(note.tone, 'idle')
+  assert.equal(note.text, 'Last confirmed 1 minute ago.')
+})
+
+test('relative time singularises and steps through the units', () => {
+  assert.equal(relativeTime(ago(5_000), NOW), 'just now')
+  assert.equal(relativeTime(ago(60_000), NOW), '1 minute ago')
+  assert.equal(relativeTime(ago(3 * 3_600_000), NOW), '3 hours ago')
+  assert.equal(relativeTime(ago(2 * 86_400_000), NOW), '2 days ago')
+  assert.equal(relativeTime(null, NOW), null)
+  assert.equal(relativeTime('not a date', NOW), null)
+})
+
+test('items group into days, newest day first, order kept within a day', () => {
+  const days = groupByDay([
+    { id: 3, occurredAt: '2026-08-17T09:00:00' },
+    { id: 2, occurredAt: '2026-08-17T08:00:00' },
+    { id: 1, occurredAt: '2026-08-16T22:00:00' },
+  ], 'en-US')
+  assert.equal(days.length, 2)
+  assert.deepEqual(days[0].items.map((i) => i.id), [3, 2])
+  assert.deepEqual(days[1].items.map((i) => i.id), [1])
+})
+
+test('an unparseable timestamp is skipped rather than making a day called Invalid Date', () => {
+  assert.deepEqual(groupByDay([{ id: 1, occurredAt: 'nonsense' }], 'en-US'), [])
+})
+
+test('a caller who saw everything is told nothing', () => {
+  assert.equal(activityScopeNote({ scope: 'members' }, true), null)
+})
+
+test('a filtered feed says so, and invites an anonymous caller to sign in', () => {
+  assert.match(activityScopeNote({ scope: 'public' }, false), /Sign in/)
+  assert.match(activityScopeNote({ scope: 'public' }, true), /members only/)
+})
+
+test('the wording never says "Team" — that is core\'s noun, not the page\'s', () => {
+  for (const signedIn of [true, false]) {
+    assert.doesNotMatch(activityScopeNote({ scope: 'public' }, signedIn), /Team/)
+  }
+  assert.doesNotMatch(freshnessNote({ configured: true, lastSyncAt: null }, NOW).text, /Team/)
+})

client/test/teamAdmin.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+// What Admin → Teams says (client/src/lib/teamAdmin.js).
+//
+// The test that earns this file: "no Teams" and "core has not been able to ask"
+// must never read the same. They produce almost identical screens — an empty
+// table — and one is fine while the other is an outage an operator needs to act
+// on. Everything else here is in service of that distinction.
+import { test } from 'node:test'
+import assert from 'node:assert/strict'
+
+import {
+  freshnessOf, ago, statusOf, gateLabelFor, describeRequest, parsePayload, leadershipOf, TONE,
+} from '../src/lib/teamAdmin.js'
+
+const minutesAgo = (n) => new Date(Date.now() - n * 60_000).toISOString()
+
+// ── Freshness: four states that must not be confused ───────────────────────
+
+test('no provider is idle, not a fault', () => {
+  const f = freshnessOf({ configured: false })
+  assert.equal(f.tone, TONE.idle)
+  assert.match(f.label, /No Team provider/)
+})
+
+test('never synced is reported as never synced, not as an empty shard', () => {
+  // The failure this prevents: an empty projection core has never confirmed,
+  // rendered as though the game genuinely has no Teams.
+  const f = freshnessOf({ configured: true, lastSyncAt: null })
+  assert.equal(f.tone, TONE.bad)
+  assert.equal(f.label, 'Never synced')
+  assert.match(f.detail, /not a confirmed empty shard/)
+})
+
+test('stale says how old it is', () => {
+  const f = freshnessOf({ configured: true, stale: true, lastSyncAt: minutesAgo(14) })
+  assert.equal(f.tone, TONE.warn)
+  assert.equal(f.label, 'Stale')
+  assert.match(f.detail, /14 minutes ago/)
+})
+
+test('current says so plainly', () => {
+  const f = freshnessOf({ configured: true, stale: false, lastSyncAt: minutesAgo(2) })
+  assert.equal(f.tone, TONE.ok)
+  assert.equal(f.label, 'Current')
+})
+
+test('ago is deliberately coarse', () => {
+  // Second-level precision would be false comfort about a projection whose poll
+  // interval is fifteen minutes.
+  assert.equal(ago(null), 'never')
+  assert.equal(ago(new Date().toISOString()), 'just now')
+  assert.equal(ago(minutesAgo(14)), '14 minutes ago')
+  assert.equal(ago(minutesAgo(60)), '1 hour ago')
+  assert.equal(ago(minutesAgo(180)), '3 hours ago')
+  assert.equal(ago(minutesAgo(60 * 72)), '3 days ago')
+})
+
+// ── Status ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('the four Team statuses are distinguishable', () => {
+  assert.equal(statusOf({ status: 'active' }).label, 'Public')
+  assert.equal(statusOf({ status: 'active', hidden: 1, hiddenReason: 'reserved_name' }).label, 'Hidden — reserved name')
+  assert.equal(statusOf({ status: 'active', hidden: 1, hiddenReason: 'staff' }).label, 'Hidden by staff')
+  assert.equal(statusOf({ status: 'archived', archivedReason: 'disbanded' }).label, 'Archived')
+  assert.equal(statusOf({ status: 'archived', archivedReason: 'renamed' }).label, 'Renamed')
+})
+
+test('a reserved-name hide is the loudest tone', () => {
+  assert.equal(statusOf({ status: 'active', hidden: 1, hiddenReason: 'reserved_name' }).tone, TONE.bad)
+  assert.equal(statusOf({ status: 'active', hidden: 1, hiddenReason: 'staff' }).tone, TONE.warn)
+})
+
+// ── The gate, described honestly ───────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('the button says what will actually happen for this role', () => {
+  // The server decides from the live role; this only describes it. Saying
+  // "Publish" to a moderator would make the pending result a surprise.
+  assert.equal(gateLabelFor('admin', 'Publish'), 'Publish')
+  assert.equal(gateLabelFor('moderator', 'Publish'), 'Request publish')
+})
+
+// ── The approval queue ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('a request describes itself, including the name being published', () => {
+  assert.equal(
+    describeRequest({ action: 'unhide', requested_username: 'mod1', team_name: 'Admin' }),
+    'mod1 asks to publish “Admin”',
+  )
+  assert.equal(
+    describeRequest({
+      action: 'display_name_override', requested_username: 'mod1', team_name: 'Admin',
+      payload: { displayName: 'The Old Guard' },
+    }),
+    'mod1 asks to display “Admin” as “The Old Guard”',
+  )
+  assert.equal(
+    describeRequest({ action: 'clear_display_name_override', requested_username: 'mod1', team_name: 'X' }),
+    'mod1 asks to clear the display name on “X”',
+  )
+})
+
+test('a deleted requester still reads as a sentence', () => {
+  // §2.10 sets requested_by to NULL and keeps the username snapshot; when even
+  // that is gone the queue must not render "null asks to publish".
+  assert.match(describeRequest({ action: 'unhide', team_name: 'Admin' }), /^a deleted user asks/)
+})
+
+test('a payload arrives parsed or as a string, and both work', () => {
+  assert.deepEqual(parsePayload({ displayName: 'X' }), { displayName: 'X' })
+  assert.deepEqual(parsePayload('{"displayName":"X"}'), { displayName: 'X' })
+  assert.deepEqual(parsePayload(null), {})
+  assert.deepEqual(parsePayload('not json'), {})
+})
+
+// ── Leadership shows the decision, not just the answer ─────────────────────
+
+test('an unoverridden member reads straight from the projection', () => {
+  const l = leadershipOf({ isLeader: true, isLeaderSynced: true })
+  assert.equal(l.isLeader, true)
+  assert.equal(l.overridden, false)
+  assert.equal(l.note, null)
+})
+
+test('an override is shown AS an override, with what the game says', () => {
+  // Staff looking at a roster need to see that a decision was made, not a fact
+  // that looks like the game's.
+  const l = leadershipOf({
+    isLeaderSynced: true,
+    leaderOverride: { effect: 'deny', by: 'mod1', reason: 'harassment' },
+  })
+  assert.equal(l.isLeader, false)
+  assert.equal(l.overridden, true)
+  assert.match(l.note, /Denied by mod1 — harassment/)
+  assert.match(l.note, /the game says leader/)
+})
+
+test('a grant override says the game disagrees', () => {
+  const l = leadershipOf({ isLeaderSynced: false, leaderOverride: { effect: 'grant', by: 'root' } })
+  assert.equal(l.isLeader, true)
+  assert.match(l.note, /the game says not a leader/)
+})

client/test/teamForum.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+// What the Team forum's client half decides for itself (client/src/lib/teamForum.js).
+//
+// The point of this file is how LITTLE that is. Who may post, who may moderate,
+// whether an image renders and whether a post may be edited are all server
+// answers the panel reads. What is tested here is the three places the client
+// turns those answers into what a reader sees — and one property that is easy to
+// break by accident: the edit offer can only ever be withdrawn here, never
+// granted.
+import { test } from 'node:test'
+import assert from 'node:assert/strict'
+
+import { REPORT_REASONS, editOfferOpen, stripToText, threadSummary } from '../src/lib/teamForum.js'
+
+const NOW = new Date('2026-08-18T12:00:00Z').getTime()
+const inMinutes = (n) => new Date(NOW + n * 60_000).toISOString()
+
+// ── the edit offer ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('the client can withdraw an edit offer and can never create one', () => {
+  // The server said no. Nothing about a deadline changes that — a future
+  // `editableUntil` on a post the server refused must not become an offer, or
+  // the client would be granting a permission.
+  assert.equal(editOfferOpen({ canEdit: false, editableUntil: inMinutes(10) }, NOW), false)
+  assert.equal(editOfferOpen({ canEdit: false, editableUntil: null }, NOW), false)
+})
+
+test('a deadline that has passed while the page sat open withdraws the offer', () => {
+  assert.equal(editOfferOpen({ canEdit: true, editableUntil: inMinutes(5) }, NOW), true)
+  // Same post, fifteen minutes of the reader staring at it later.
+  assert.equal(editOfferOpen({ canEdit: true, editableUntil: inMinutes(5) }, NOW + 15 * 60_000), false)
+})
+
+test('no deadline means no deadline, not no permission', () => {
+  // Staff are not time-bounded, and `editableUntil: null` is how the server says
+  // so. Reading it as "expired" would take the edit control away from exactly the
+  // people whose authority does not expire.
+  assert.equal(editOfferOpen({ canEdit: true, editableUntil: null }, NOW), true)
+})
+
+test('an unparseable deadline closes the offer rather than opening it', () => {
+  assert.equal(editOfferOpen({ canEdit: true, editableUntil: 'not a date' }, NOW), false)
+  assert.equal(editOfferOpen(null, NOW), false)
+  assert.equal(editOfferOpen(undefined, NOW), false)
+})
+
+// ── round-tripping a body back into the composer ───────────────────────────
+
+test('the image core generated is stripped, and the URL that made it survives', () => {
+  // §5.5.3: the author wrote a URL, core emitted the <img> at read time. Handing
+  // the <img> back would let an author edit markup they never wrote — and the
+  // URL is what re-renders it, so nothing is lost by removing it.
+  const rendered = '<p><a href="https://x/a.png" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://x/a.png</a>'
+    + '<img src="https://x/a.png" class="forum-embed" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" /></p>'
+  const text = stripToText(rendered)
+  assert.ok(!text.includes('<img'))
+  assert.ok(text.includes('https://x/a.png'))
+})
+
+test('paragraphs become blank lines and breaks become newlines', () => {
+  assert.equal(stripToText('<p>One</p><p>Two</p>'), 'One\n\nTwo')
+  assert.equal(stripToText('<p>One<br>Two</p>'), 'One\nTwo')
+  // A paragraph carrying attributes is still a paragraph.
+  assert.equal(stripToText('<p>One</p>\n<p class="x">Two</p>'), 'One\n\nTwo')
+})
+
+test('entities decode to what the author typed, and only once', () => {
+  assert.equal(stripToText('<p>Tom &amp; Jerry</p>'), 'Tom & Jerry')
+  assert.equal(stripToText('<p>&quot;quoted&quot;</p>'), '"quoted"')
+
+  // The one that bites: an author who typed a literal "<script>" has it stored
+  // escaped. Decoding entities BEFORE stripping tags would turn it into a real
+  // tag that the strip pass then deletes — silently losing text the author wrote
+  // and which was never dangerous.
+  assert.equal(stripToText('<p>&lt;script&gt;</p>'), '<script>')
+  // And decoding &amp; first would turn "&amp;lt;" into "<" in two steps.
+  assert.equal(stripToText('<p>&amp;lt;</p>'), '&lt;')
+})
+
+test('an empty or absent body is an empty string, never a crash', () => {
+  assert.equal(stripToText(''), '')
+  assert.equal(stripToText(null), '')
+  assert.equal(stripToText(undefined), '')
+  assert.equal(stripToText('<p></p>'), '')
+})
+
+// ── the thread list line ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('a discussion counts REPLIES, which is one fewer than its posts', () => {
+  // postCount includes the opening post. Showing it raw would tell a reader a
+  // brand-new thread already has one reply.
+  assert.equal(threadSummary({ type: 'discussion', author: 'ada', postCount: 1 }), 'ada')
+  assert.equal(threadSummary({ type: 'discussion', author: 'ada', postCount: 2 }), 'ada · 1 reply')
+  assert.equal(threadSummary({ type: 'discussion', author: 'ada', postCount: 4 }), 'ada · 3 replies')
+})
+
+test('an announcement says so and never counts replies, because it takes none', () => {
+  const line = threadSummary({ type: 'announcement', author: 'aldric', postCount: 1 })
+  assert.equal(line, 'Announcement · aldric')
+  assert.ok(!line.includes('repl'))
+})
+
+test('hidden is said out loud — it is only shown to whoever can unhide it', () => {
+  assert.equal(
+    threadSummary({ type: 'discussion', author: 'ada', postCount: 1, status: 'hidden' }),
+    'ada · hidden',
+  )
+})
+
+// ── the report control ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('every reason the server accepts is offered, and no others', () => {
+  // The server validates against its own list; a client offering a reason the
+  // server rejects produces a 400 the reporter cannot act on, and one MISSING a
+  // reason quietly funnels those reports into "other".
+  assert.deepEqual(
+    REPORT_REASONS.map(([value]) => value).sort(),
+    ['abuse', 'illegal', 'impersonation', 'other', 'sexual', 'spam'],
+  )
+  assert.ok(REPORT_REASONS.every(([, label]) => typeof label === 'string' && label.length > 0))
+})

client/test/teamIntegrations.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+// What Admin → Teams → Notification bridge decides (client/src/lib/teamIntegrations.js).
+//
+// The test that earns this file: **repointing a row must not carry its
+// acknowledgement across.** That is the one way this screen could actively
+// mislead — an operator confirms a private channel, changes the id to a public
+// one, and the form still shows the confirmation as standing. The server clears
+// it either way, so the failure would be a screen that disagrees with the answer
+// it is about to get, which is worse than one that simply refuses.
+//
+// The rest is the boundary of the confirmation dialog: it must open when it
+// matters and stay shut when it does not, because a dialog that appears on saves
+// that did not need it is one people learn to click through.
+import { test } from 'node:test'
+import assert from 'node:assert/strict'
+
+import {
+  eventLabel, rowKey, isDefaultRow, blankDraft, draftFrom, appliesToLabel, toggleEvent,
+  setChannel, carriesMembersOnly, needsAcknowledgement, membersOnlyIdsOf, availableTargets,
+} from '../src/lib/teamIntegrations.js'
+
+const MEMBERS_ONLY = ['team.forum.post', 'team.announcement']
+const ROSTER = 'team.member.joined'
+const FORUM = 'team.forum.post'
+
+const draft = (over = {}) => ({ ...blankDraft(null), ...over })
+
+// ── The acknowledgement dies with its channel ──────────────────────────────
+
+test('changing the channel drops a standing acknowledgement', () => {
+  const before = draft({ channelRef: '111', membersAck: true, events: [FORUM], enabled: true })
+  const after = setChannel(before, '222')
+  assert.equal(after.membersAck, false)
+  assert.equal(after.channelRef, '222')
+})
+
+test('setting the SAME channel does not clear it — an unrelated re-render is not a repoint', () => {
+  const before = draft({ channelRef: '111', membersAck: true })
+  const after = setChannel(before, '111')
+  assert.equal(after.membersAck, true)
+  assert.equal(after, before, 'and the object is returned unchanged, so nothing re-renders')
+})
+
+test('a repointed row needs the dialog again, which is the whole point of clearing it', () => {
+  const before = draft({ channelRef: '111', membersAck: true, events: [FORUM], enabled: true })
+  assert.equal(needsAcknowledgement(before, MEMBERS_ONLY), false)
+  assert.equal(needsAcknowledgement(setChannel(before, '222'), MEMBERS_ONLY), true)
+})
+
+// ── When the dialog opens ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('enabling a forum event without the tick asks first', () => {
+  assert.equal(needsAcknowledgement(draft({ events: [FORUM], enabled: true }), MEMBERS_ONLY), true)
+})
+
+test('a DISABLED draft carrying forum events does not ask — nothing is being published yet', () => {
+  assert.equal(needsAcknowledgement(draft({ events: [FORUM], enabled: false }), MEMBERS_ONLY), false)
+})
+
+test('a roster-only bridge never asks, however it is configured', () => {
+  assert.equal(needsAcknowledgement(draft({ events: [ROSTER], enabled: true }), MEMBERS_ONLY), false)
+  assert.equal(carriesMembersOnly(draft({ events: [ROSTER] }), MEMBERS_ONLY), false)
+})
+
+test('an acknowledgement already given means no second dialog for an unrelated edit', () => {
+  const d = draft({ events: [FORUM], enabled: true, membersAck: true, channelRef: '111' })
+  const withRoster = toggleEvent(d, ROSTER)
+  assert.equal(needsAcknowledgement(withRoster, MEMBERS_ONLY), false)
+})
+
+test('the members-only set comes from the server, not from a list held here', () => {
+  // The client must not decide what is members-only: a future stream added
+  // server-side would silently escape a hardcoded client list.
+  assert.deepEqual(
+    membersOnlyIdsOf([{ id: ROSTER, membersOnly: false }, { id: FORUM, membersOnly: true }]),
+    [FORUM],
+  )
+  // Told nothing is members-only, the dialog never opens — the server is the one
+  // that would then refuse, which is the correct division.
+  assert.equal(needsAcknowledgement(draft({ events: [FORUM], enabled: true }), []), false)
+})
+
+// ── Events, rows and targets ───────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('toggling adds then removes, and preserves selection order', () => {
+  let d = draft()
+  d = toggleEvent(d, FORUM)
+  d = toggleEvent(d, ROSTER)
+  assert.deepEqual(d.events, [FORUM, ROSTER])
+  d = toggleEvent(d, FORUM)
+  assert.deepEqual(d.events, [ROSTER])
+})
+
+test('the default row is identified by a NULL team, and an undefined one counts too', () => {
+  assert.equal(isDefaultRow({ team_id: null }), true)
+  assert.equal(isDefaultRow({}), true)
+  assert.equal(isDefaultRow({ team_id: 4 }), false)
+  assert.equal(rowKey({ team_id: null }), 'default')
+  assert.equal(rowKey({ team_id: 4 }), '4')
+})
+
+test('a row is labelled by the staff override first, then the name, then its id', () => {
+  assert.equal(appliesToLabel({ team_id: null }), 'All Teams')
+  assert.equal(appliesToLabel({ team_id: 4, team_name: 'Real', display_name_override: 'Shown' }), 'Shown')
+  assert.equal(appliesToLabel({ team_id: 4, team_name: 'Real' }), 'Real')
+  assert.equal(appliesToLabel({ team_id: 4 }), 'Team #4')
+})
+
+test('a Team that already has an override is not offered a second one', () => {
+  const rows = [{ team_id: null }, { team_id: 2 }]
+  const teams = [{ id: 1, status: 'active' }, { id: 2, status: 'active' }, { id: 3, status: 'archived' }]
+  const { hasDefault, teams: available } = availableTargets(rows, teams)
+  assert.equal(hasDefault, true)
+  assert.deepEqual(available.map((t) => t.id), [1], 'the taken one and the archived one are both out')
+})
+
+test('with no default configured, the default is still offered', () => {
+  const { hasDefault } = availableTargets([{ team_id: 2 }], [])
+  assert.equal(hasDefault, false)
+})
+
+test('a row round-trips through the draft without changing what it means', () => {
+  const row = { team_id: 4, events: [FORUM], channel_ref: '111', enabled: 1, members_ack: 1 }
+  assert.deepEqual(draftFrom(row), { teamId: 4, events: [FORUM], channelRef: '111', enabled: true, membersAck: true })
+})
+
+test('an unknown event id renders as itself rather than as blank', () => {
+  assert.equal(eventLabel(FORUM), 'New forum post')
+  assert.equal(eventLabel('team.something.new'), 'team.something.new')
+})

client/test/teamNotify.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+import { test, beforeEach, afterEach } from 'node:test'
+import assert from 'node:assert/strict'
+import { api } from '../src/api/client.js'
+
+// The client half of Team notifications (docs/website/TEAMS.md Part 6, phase 6).
+//
+// There is no DOM in this runner, so what is asserted here is the WIRE — which is
+// where this feature's client-side mistakes actually live. Two of them have
+// already been made once in this repo and are recorded rather than re-derived:
+//
+//   1. **A PUT-the-whole-set body must always carry its array**, empty included.
+//      `docs/android/PLAN.md` §11: a DTO field with a default is dropped by
+//      kotlinx when it equals that default, so "clear the last entry" arrives as a
+//      body with no array at all and 400s. The web client has no such
+//      serialisation quirk, but it shares the endpoint's contract, and a test that
+//      pins the shape here is what keeps the two clients honest about the same
+//      rule.
+//   2. **The unsubscribe call is a POST**, not the GET the link in the mail was.
+//      A GET that mutated would be triggered by every mail-client link scanner.
+
+let calls
+const realFetch = global.fetch
+
+function reply(body = {}) {
+  return {
+    ok: true,
+    status: 200,
+    statusText: 'OK',
+    text: async () => JSON.stringify(body),
+  }
+}
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  calls = []
+  global.fetch = async (url, opts = {}) => {
+    calls.push({ url, opts })
+    return reply({ teams: [], streams: [], ok: true })
+  }
+})
+
+afterEach(() => { global.fetch = realFetch })
+
+const body = (i = 0) => JSON.parse(calls[i].opts.body)
+
+test('the per-Team preference endpoints sit under /auth/me, not /player', async () => {
+  await api.teamNotificationPrefs()
+  // Role-agnostic self-service, the same rule that put the Team forum under
+  // /player rather than behind a staff gate: staff are a superset of players and
+  // manage their own notifications like anyone else.
+  assert.match(calls[0].url, /\/auth\/me\/notifications\/teams$/)
+  assert.equal(calls[0].opts.method ?? 'GET', 'GET')
+})
+
+test('saving preferences PUTs the whole set under a `teams` key', async () => {
+  await api.setTeamNotificationPrefs([{ teamId: 3, muted: true, emailMode: 'digest' }])
+  assert.equal(calls[0].opts.method, 'PUT')
+  assert.deepEqual(body(), { teams: [{ teamId: 3, muted: true, emailMode: 'digest' }] })
+})
+
+test('clearing every preference still sends the array, never an absent key', async () => {
+  await api.setTeamNotificationPrefs([])
+  assert.deepEqual(body(), { teams: [] })
+  assert.equal('teams' in body(), true)
+})
+
+test('the same rule holds for the stream subscriptions beside them', async () => {
+  await api.setNotificationSubscriptions([])
+  assert.deepEqual(body(), { streams: [] })
+})
+
+test('unsubscribe is a POST to the public tier, with the token encoded into the path', async () => {
+  await api.unsubscribeTeam('1.7.3.abcDEF')
+  assert.equal(calls[0].opts.method, 'POST')
+  assert.match(calls[0].url, /\/public\/teams\/unsubscribe\/1\.7\.3\.abcDEF$/)
+})
+
+test('a token with url-unsafe characters is encoded rather than pasted in', async () => {
+  await api.unsubscribeTeam('a/b c')
+  assert.match(calls[0].url, /unsubscribe\/a%2Fb%20c$/)
+})
+
+test('the streams catalog and subscriptions are separate reads', async () => {
+  await api.notificationStreams()
+  await api.notificationSubscriptions()
+  assert.match(calls[0].url, /\/notifications\/streams$/)
+  assert.match(calls[1].url, /\/notifications\/subscriptions$/)
+})

client/test/teamVoice.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+// Admin → Teams → Voice channels, the decisions (TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9).
+//
+// These mirror server rules and do not replace them: the server refuses to enable
+// voice while the bot cannot act, and the reconciler applies the threshold and the
+// grace window, whether or not this file ever ran. What is asserted here is that
+// the SCREEN agrees with those answers instead of offering a control that will
+// fail, or describing a state the deployment is not in.
+//
+// The one that matters most is `statusSummary`'s "off" branch. Switching voice off
+// suspends the reconciler in both directions and deliberately leaves existing
+// channels standing — a checkbox must not delete structure in somebody's guild —
+// and an operator who reads "off" as "nothing is provisioned" would never go
+// looking for the channels that are still there.
+
+import { test } from 'node:test'
+import assert from 'node:assert/strict'
+
+import {
+  stateLabel, enableBlockedReason, roleHeadroom, removalCountdown,
+  parseStaffRoles, formatStaffRoles, statusSummary,
+} from '../src/lib/teamVoice.js'
+
+test('every state the server can report has wording', () => {
+  for (const state of ['none', 'active', 'pending_removal', 'error']) {
+    assert.notEqual(stateLabel(state), state)
+  }
+})
+
+test('an unknown state falls back to itself rather than rendering blank', () => {
+  assert.equal(stateLabel('something-new'), 'something-new')
+})
+
+// ── The enable gate ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('a ready bot blocks nothing', () => {
+  assert.equal(enableBlockedReason({ ready: true, connected: true, missingPermissions: [] }), null)
+})
+
+test('a disconnected bot and a bot missing a permission read differently', () => {
+  const disconnected = enableBlockedReason({ ready: false, connected: false, reason: 'the bot is not connected to Discord' })
+  const missing = enableBlockedReason({ ready: false, connected: true, missingPermissions: ['Manage Roles'] })
+  assert.match(disconnected, /not connected/)
+  assert.match(missing, /Manage Roles/)
+  // An operator fixes these in two completely different places, so collapsing
+  // them into one message would send half of them to the wrong one.
+  assert.notEqual(disconnected, missing)
+})
+
+test('an absent preflight blocks rather than silently allowing', () => {
+  assert.ok(enableBlockedReason(null))
+  assert.ok(enableBlockedReason(undefined))
+})
+
+// ── The role ceiling ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('headroom is counted against the guild-wide cap', () => {
+  const h = roleHeadroom({ roleCount: 200, roleCap: 250 })
+  assert.equal(h.free, 50)
+  assert.equal(h.tight, false)
+  assert.equal(h.exhausted, false)
+})
+
+test('a nearly full guild is flagged before the create fails, not after', () => {
+  // The whole reason this is in the panel: access is a per-Team role, so the cap
+  // limits how many TEAMS can have voice, and an operator with sixty guilds needs
+  // to know that before the sixtieth silently errors.
+  const h = roleHeadroom({ roleCount: 240, roleCap: 250 })
+  assert.equal(h.tight, true)
+  assert.equal(h.exhausted, false)
+})
+
+test('a full guild is exhausted, and never reports negative headroom', () => {
+  const h = roleHeadroom({ roleCount: 260, roleCap: 250 })
+  assert.equal(h.free, 0)
+  assert.equal(h.exhausted, true)
+})
+
+test('no preflight means no claim about headroom', () => {
+  assert.equal(roleHeadroom(null), null)
+  assert.equal(roleHeadroom({}), null)
+})
+
+// ── The grace window ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('a row that is not scheduled has no countdown', () => {
+  assert.equal(removalCountdown({ state: 'active', removeAfter: null }), null)
+})
+
+test('a running window reads in days', () => {
+  const now = new Date('2026-08-19T00:00:00Z')
+  const text = removalCountdown({ state: 'pending_removal', removeAfter: '2026-08-24T00:00:00Z' }, now)
+  assert.equal(text, 'in 5 days')
+})
+
+test('under a day reads in hours rather than rounding to zero days', () => {
+  const now = new Date('2026-08-19T00:00:00Z')
+  const text = removalCountdown({ state: 'pending_removal', removeAfter: '2026-08-19T06:00:00Z' }, now)
+  assert.equal(text, 'in 6 hours')
+})
+
+test('an expired window says the next pass will act, not "in 0 days"', () => {
+  const now = new Date('2026-08-19T00:00:00Z')
+  const text = removalCountdown({ state: 'pending_removal', removeAfter: '2026-08-18T00:00:00Z' }, now)
+  assert.match(text, /next pass/)
+})
+
+// ── Staff roles ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('staff roles parse from the comma-separated ids a person actually pastes', () => {
+  const { roles, invalid } = parseStaffRoles(' 123456789012345678 , 987654321098765432 ')
+  assert.deepEqual(roles, ['123456789012345678', '987654321098765432'])
+  assert.deepEqual(invalid, [])
+})
+
+test('a typo is REPORTED, never quietly dropped', () => {
+  const { invalid } = parseStaffRoles('123456789012345678, @Moderators')
+  assert.deepEqual(invalid, ['@Moderators'])
+})
+
+test('an empty field is a legitimate answer and not an error', () => {
+  const { roles, invalid } = parseStaffRoles('')
+  assert.deepEqual(roles, [])
+  assert.deepEqual(invalid, [])
+})
+
+test('roles round-trip through the field', () => {
+  const { roles } = parseStaffRoles(formatStaffRoles(['111111111111111111', '222222222222222222']))
+  assert.deepEqual(roles, ['111111111111111111', '222222222222222222'])
+})
+
+// ── The status line ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+test('off with channels still standing says so — the surprising case', () => {
+  const text = statusSummary({ enabled: false }, [{ channelRef: '900' }, { channelRef: '901' }])
+  assert.match(text, /^Off\./)
+  assert.match(text, /2 channels remain/)
+})
+
+test('off with nothing provisioned does not invent a warning', () => {
+  const text = statusSummary({ enabled: false }, [])
+  assert.match(text, /No channels are provisioned/)
+})
+
+test('on states the threshold in the words the setting uses', () => {
+  const text = statusSummary({ enabled: true, minMembers: 5 }, [{ channelRef: '900' }])
+  assert.match(text, /at least 5 members/)
+  assert.match(text, /1 provisioned/)
+})
+
+test('a threshold of one is not pluralised', () => {
+  assert.match(statusSummary({ enabled: true, minMembers: 1 }, []), /at least 1 member get/)
+})

server/db/schema.sql

@@ -845,6 +845,561 @@ CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS installed_modules (
   INDEX idx_installed_modules_state (state)
 ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
 
+-- ── Teams (docs/website/TEAMS.md Part 2, phase 2) ─────────────────────────────
+--
+-- A Team is a core platform entity POPULATED by a module and owned by core. The
+-- module answers "what teams exist and who is in them" through the team provider
+-- (MODULE_API.md — registerTeamProvider); core stores the answer, gates it and
+-- displays it. Every table below is core-internal (TEAMS.md §10.3): a module must
+-- never read or write one, even though a module is what fills them.
+--
+-- Note the tables carry no `<moduleId>_` prefix, correctly — MODULE_API.md §2.6's
+-- prefix rule binds modules, and these are core's.
+
+-- The Team itself. `external_id` is the module's own stable identity for it
+-- (module-uo sends the persistent ServUO Guild.Id) and is opaque to core.
+--
+-- `name` is IMMUTABLE for the life of the row (§2.2): a rename archives this row
+-- with archived_reason='renamed' and creates a new one, so the old Team keeps its
+-- activity, its grants and its forum as a read-only record. What staff can change
+-- is display_name_override, which changes what is RENDERED and never what the row
+-- IS — identity and display are different things and only identity is frozen.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS teams (
+  id            INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
+  module_id     VARCHAR(32)  NOT NULL,          -- which module is authoritative
+  external_id   VARCHAR(191) NOT NULL,          -- opaque to core
+  name          VARCHAR(160) NOT NULL,
+  abbr          VARCHAR(32)  NULL,
+  slug          VARCHAR(191) NOT NULL,          -- derived from name, unique among ACTIVE teams
+  status        ENUM('active','archived') NOT NULL DEFAULT 'active',
+  meta          JSON         NULL,              -- module-supplied, opaque (alliance, crest, …)
+  member_count  INT          NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,   -- denormalised from team_members
+  linked_count  INT          NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,   -- members whose user_id is not null
+  online_count  INT          NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,   -- last known; refreshed by sync
+  -- Public suppression, independent of status. A hidden Team still works
+  -- completely for its own members; it is absent from public surfaces (§2.8).
+  hidden        TINYINT(1)   NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
+  hidden_reason ENUM('reserved_name','staff') NULL,
+  hidden_term   VARCHAR(64)  NULL,              -- which reserved term matched, for the review queue
+  -- Set once staff have made an explicit decision about the name. Re-screening
+  -- runs on every sync, and this is what stops it re-hiding a Team a human has
+  -- already allowed — without it the override would be undone every 15 minutes.
+  name_reviewed_at DATETIME  NULL,
+  -- PER-TEAM freshness, which team_sync_state cannot express: it holds one row per
+  -- MODULE, and §2.4 gate 3 leaves one Team's roster untouched while the others
+  -- sync normally. Without a per-Team stamp that Team's page would claim the
+  -- module's last success as its own, which is precisely the staleness the rule
+  -- exists to surface. Bumped only when a roster is actually applied.
+  roster_synced_at DATETIME  NULL,
+  -- §2.4 gate 4's per-Team quarantine, the twin of team_sync_state.pending_empty_
+  -- since: an authoritative-but-empty ROSTER for a Team that currently has members
+  -- is remembered here and applied only if the next answer agrees.
+  members_empty_since DATETIME NULL,
+  -- Staff may change what is DISPLAYED without touching identity (§2.8.3).
+  display_name_override VARCHAR(160) NULL,
+  -- The successor row written at archive time when this Team was renamed, so the
+  -- old slug can still resolve and explain itself rather than 404 (§2.2).
+  succeeded_by  INT          NULL,
+  created_at    DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  archived_at   DATETIME NULL,
+  archived_reason VARCHAR(64) NULL,             -- 'disbanded' | 'renamed' | 'staff'
+  -- A generated column is how "unique among ACTIVE rows only" is expressed without
+  -- a partial index (MariaDB has none): NULL never collides in a UNIQUE key, so
+  -- any number of archived rows may share an external_id.
+  active_key    VARCHAR(191) AS (IF(status='active', external_id, NULL)) STORED,
+  active_slug   VARCHAR(191) AS (IF(status='active', slug, NULL)) STORED,
+  UNIQUE KEY uq_teams_active (module_id, active_key),
+  UNIQUE KEY uq_teams_active_slug (active_slug),
+  INDEX idx_teams_status (status),
+  INDEX idx_teams_slug (slug),
+  INDEX idx_teams_review (hidden, hidden_reason),
+  -- Self-referential and deliberately SET NULL: a successor may itself be archived
+  -- and eventually pruned, and losing the pointer must not take the old row with it.
+  CONSTRAINT fk_teams_succeeded_by FOREIGN KEY (succeeded_by) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE SET NULL
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- The membership PROJECTION. Module-authoritative; core only mirrors it, and the
+-- sync is the ONLY writer (§2.5 path 1). Rows are soft-departed rather than
+-- deleted so history and rejoin detection survive, and so the activity feed can
+-- still name a departed member.
+--
+-- user_id is resolved BY THE MODULE (it owns the game↔site link table); core never
+-- resolves it, because doing so would be core reading a module's table by name.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_members (
+  team_id       INT          NOT NULL,
+  member_key    VARCHAR(191) NOT NULL,          -- module's stable member id (UO: character serial)
+  display_name  VARCHAR(160) NULL,              -- in-game name
+  user_id       INT          NULL,              -- resolved by the MODULE; NULL = unlinked
+  is_leader     TINYINT(1)   NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
+  rank_label    VARCHAR(48)  NULL,              -- module vocabulary, opaque to core
+  online        TINYINT(1)   NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
+  status        ENUM('active','departed') NOT NULL DEFAULT 'active',
+  first_seen_at DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  last_seen_at  DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  departed_at   DATETIME NULL,
+  PRIMARY KEY (team_id, member_key),
+  -- SET NULL, not CASCADE (§2.10): deleting a site account does not remove the
+  -- character from the guild — only the link to the site goes.
+  CONSTRAINT fk_team_members_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_team_members_user FOREIGN KEY (user_id) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  INDEX idx_team_members_user (user_id),
+  INDEX idx_team_members_status (team_id, status)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- Freshness of the module's answer. One row per module. THE table invariant 1
+-- ("module unavailability is staleness, never emptiness") is enforced against.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_sync_state (
+  module_id            VARCHAR(32) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
+  last_attempt_at      DATETIME NULL,
+  last_success_at      DATETIME NULL,
+  consecutive_failures INT      NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
+  last_error           VARCHAR(500) NULL,
+  -- The quarantine for §2.4's mass-deletion guard: an authoritative-but-empty
+  -- answer is remembered here and applied only if the NEXT one agrees.
+  pending_empty_since  DATETIME NULL,
+  INDEX idx_team_sync_success (last_success_at)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- Staff leadership overrides (§2.5.1), applied ON TOP of the synced value at read
+-- time. The projection is never mutated: the sync keeps writing what the game
+-- says and this keeps saying what staff decided, which is the whole point — an
+-- override the sync clobbered every 15 minutes would be useless.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_leader_overrides (
+  team_id       INT          NOT NULL,
+  member_key    VARCHAR(191) NOT NULL,
+  effect        ENUM('grant','deny') NOT NULL,
+  actor_user_id INT          NULL,
+  actor_username VARCHAR(32) NULL,              -- snapshot, so the record survives the account
+  reason        VARCHAR(255) NULL,
+  created_at    DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  PRIMARY KEY (team_id, member_key),
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tlo_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tlo_actor FOREIGN KEY (actor_user_id) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- Forum access grants (§2.5 path 3) — an append-only grant/revoke ledger that is
+-- ALSO the current state. An active grant is one with revoked_at IS NULL, and a
+-- generated column is how "one active grant per (team,user)" is expressed without
+-- a partial index (MariaDB has none): NULL never collides in a UNIQUE key.
+--
+-- The table lands here, in the phase that builds the resolver, so forumAccess() is
+-- written once and its non-contamination tests are real. The grant/revoke FLOW,
+-- the per-Team cap and the leader UI are phase 4's; nothing writes this table yet.
+--
+-- user_id is NULLABLE and SET NULL, which contradicts the sketch in TEAMS.md §2.5
+-- and follows §2.10, which settled it deliberately: CASCADE would delete the audit
+-- trail of who granted whom, which is exactly what an audit exists to survive. The
+-- username snapshots keep the record readable after the account is gone.
+--
+-- THE TWO CANNOT BOTH BE HAD AS §2.5 WROTE THEM, and this is why the marker below
+-- is a bare flag rather than §2.5's `active_user AS (IF(revoked_at IS NULL,
+-- user_id, NULL))`. MariaDB refuses `ON DELETE SET NULL` on a foreign key whose
+-- column is a base column of a STORED generated column (ER_GENERATED_COLUMN_
+-- FUNCTION_IS_NOT_ALLOWED, 1901) — so §2.5's generated column forces §2.10's
+-- CASCADE, and the audit trail with it. Deriving the marker from `revoked_at`
+-- ALONE and putting user_id in the KEY instead gives identical semantics: at most
+-- one active row per (team_id, user_id), unlimited revoked rows, and user_id free
+-- to be a SET NULL foreign key. Verified against MariaDB 11 both ways.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_forum_grants (
+  id          INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
+  team_id     INT NOT NULL,
+  user_id     INT NULL,
+  username    VARCHAR(32) NULL,                -- snapshot of the grantee at grant time
+  granted_by  INT NULL,                        -- NULL for a system grant, or a deleted actor
+  granted_username VARCHAR(32) NULL,           -- snapshot of the actor
+  granted_at  DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  reason      VARCHAR(255) NULL,
+  revoked_by  INT NULL,
+  revoked_username VARCHAR(32) NULL,
+  revoked_at  DATETIME NULL,
+  revoke_reason VARCHAR(255) NULL,
+  active_marker TINYINT(1) AS (IF(revoked_at IS NULL, 1, NULL)) STORED,
+  UNIQUE KEY uq_team_forum_grant_active (team_id, user_id, active_marker),
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfg_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfg_user FOREIGN KEY (user_id) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfg_granted_by FOREIGN KEY (granted_by) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfg_revoked_by FOREIGN KEY (revoked_by) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  INDEX idx_tfg_user (user_id)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- ── Team forums (TEAMS.md Part 5, phase 4 "5a") ────────────────────────────
+--
+-- The WHOLE forum schema lands here, in 5a, including the columns only 5b uses.
+-- That is §5.1's split-by-layer: 5a ships the access model and announcements, 5b
+-- enables discussion by opening paths rather than by migrating data. `type`,
+-- `locked`, `pinned` and the whole post table exist from day one so that the
+-- second half adds no ALTER.
+--
+-- Every table here is guarded by `teams_forums_enabled` at the ROUTE level and
+-- never at the data level (§5.5.1). Switching the forum off must not delete a
+-- thread, revoke a grant or clear a subscription, because the operator will
+-- switch it back on and expects what they had.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_forum_threads (
+  id           INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
+  team_id      INT          NOT NULL,
+  type         ENUM('announcement','discussion') NOT NULL DEFAULT 'discussion',
+  title        VARCHAR(200) NOT NULL,
+  created_by   INT          NULL,              -- SET NULL: the body survives the account (§2.10)
+  created_username VARCHAR(32) NULL,           -- snapshot, so a deleted author still reads
+  created_at   DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  last_post_at DATETIME NULL,
+  post_count   INT          NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
+  pinned       TINYINT(1)   NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
+  locked       TINYINT(1)   NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
+  status       ENUM('visible','hidden','deleted') NOT NULL DEFAULT 'visible',
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tft_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tft_user FOREIGN KEY (created_by) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  INDEX idx_tft_team_feed (team_id, status, pinned, last_post_at)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- `body_html` is sanitised ON WRITE and served without re-sanitising, the same
+-- contract the wiki and the CMS already follow — but through the FORUM's own
+-- profile (utils/forumHtml.js), not the shared one. The shared profile allows
+-- `<img>` from any host, which would make `teams_forum_images` unenforceable:
+-- every post could hotlink in every mode and the setting would be decoration.
+-- No stored body ever contains an `<img>`; core's renderer emits those at read
+-- time from the URLs the author wrote (§5.5.3), which is why flipping the policy
+-- back to `disabled` un-renders every image on every existing post with no
+-- migration at all.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_forum_posts (
+  id           BIGINT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
+  thread_id    INT          NOT NULL,
+  author_user_id INT        NULL,
+  author_username VARCHAR(32) NULL,            -- snapshot; renders as "[deleted account]" when both are gone
+  body_html    MEDIUMTEXT   NOT NULL,          -- sanitised on write via utils/forumHtml.js
+  created_at   DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  edited_at    DATETIME NULL,
+  edited_by    INT      NULL,
+  status       ENUM('visible','hidden','deleted') NOT NULL DEFAULT 'visible',
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfp_thread FOREIGN KEY (thread_id) REFERENCES team_forum_threads(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfp_user FOREIGN KEY (author_user_id) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfp_editor FOREIGN KEY (edited_by) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  INDEX idx_tfp_thread (thread_id, status, created_at)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- Append-only. Never updated, never deleted.
+--
+-- Deliberately NOT merged into the site's mod_actions/appeals pair (§5.3), which
+-- is Discord-sanction-shaped and bot-owned: routing a guild leader locking a
+-- thread through it would make ordinary housekeeping an appealable sanction with
+-- a reversal path into the bot. The two are cross-referenced instead — every
+-- STAFF-exercised action here additionally writes an activity_log row, so the
+-- site's staff-accountability trail sees it; a LEADER-exercised one writes only
+-- this ledger. `actor_role` records WHICH authority was exercised, which is the
+-- column that makes that distinction auditable after the fact.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_forum_moderation (
+  id           BIGINT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
+  team_id      INT          NOT NULL,
+  target_type  ENUM('thread','post') NOT NULL,
+  target_id    BIGINT       NOT NULL,
+  action       ENUM('pin','unpin','lock','unlock','hide','unhide','delete','restore') NOT NULL,
+  actor_user_id INT         NULL,
+  actor_username VARCHAR(32) NULL,             -- snapshot (§2.10)
+  actor_role   ENUM('leader','staff') NOT NULL,
+  reason       VARCHAR(255) NULL,
+  created_at   DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfm_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfm_actor FOREIGN KEY (actor_user_id) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  INDEX idx_tfm_target (target_type, target_id),
+  INDEX idx_tfm_team (team_id, created_at)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- Upload attribution (§5.2a, §5.5.4). Not bookkeeping: the acknowledgement an
+-- operator gives before enabling uploads is meaningless if "who uploaded this"
+-- cannot be answered afterwards, and the deletion sweep needs a row to sweep.
+--
+-- `post_id` is NULL between the upload and the post that embeds it — the composer
+-- uploads first and references the URL in the body — and that is exactly the state
+-- the orphan sweep looks for. `deleted_at` is a soft delete: the file survives a
+-- retention window so a mis-click is recoverable, then the nightly sweep removes
+-- the bytes.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_forum_uploads (
+  id           BIGINT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
+  team_id      INT          NOT NULL,
+  post_id      BIGINT       NULL,
+  uploader_user_id INT      NULL,
+  uploader_username VARCHAR(32) NULL,          -- snapshot: attribution must survive the account
+  filename     VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,          -- the STORED name, never originalname
+  mimetype     VARCHAR(64)  NOT NULL,          -- the SNIFFED type, never the client's header
+  byte_size    INT          NOT NULL,
+  created_at   DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  deleted_at   DATETIME NULL,
+  deleted_by   INT          NULL,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfu_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfu_post FOREIGN KEY (post_id) REFERENCES team_forum_posts(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfu_user FOREIGN KEY (uploader_user_id) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tfu_deleter FOREIGN KEY (deleted_by) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  UNIQUE KEY uq_tfu_filename (filename),
+  INDEX idx_tfu_uploader (uploader_user_id, created_at),
+  INDEX idx_tfu_sweep (deleted_at)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- Member-raised abuse reports (§5.6). **Core had no user-facing report flow of
+-- any kind before this**: `moderation`, `mod_notes` and `appeals` are all either
+-- staff-initiated or Discord-sanction-shaped, and nothing anywhere let a MEMBER
+-- say "this is a problem". That was survivable while every piece of content on
+-- the site came from staff. It stops being survivable the moment a Team forum
+-- lets players write to each other, and stops twice over when `uploads` mode lets
+-- them put files on the operator's disk under a signed liability acknowledgement.
+--
+-- The gap has a specific shape worth naming: leaders moderate their own Team's
+-- forum, and a Team's leaders are exactly the people who will not report their own
+-- Team. So this table's whole point is a path that routes AROUND a Team's own
+-- leadership — **reports go to site staff and to nobody else.** There is
+-- deliberately no leader-facing view of this queue (org lead, 2026-08-18); a
+-- leader-visible report about a leader is not a report.
+--
+-- Not a `team_*` table, and not named for the forum: `target_type` is a plain
+-- VARCHAR so wiki pages, news comments and profile fields become new values
+-- rather than new tables. Team forum content is only the first consumer.
+--
+-- **The unique key is on an `open_marker`, not on `status`.** §5.6 writes the key
+-- as (target_type, target_id, reporter_user_id, status), and that spelling has a
+-- defect worth recording rather than quietly fixing: it makes CLOSED rows collide
+-- with each other too. A reporter reports a post, staff dismiss it, the behaviour
+-- recurs, they report it again — and the second dismissal is an UPDATE into a
+-- (…, 'dismissed') tuple that already exists, so working the queue would start
+-- throwing duplicate-key errors after the first repeat reporter.
+--
+-- The generated marker is the same trick `team_forum_grants.active_marker` uses:
+-- it is 1 while the report is OPEN and NULL once it is closed, and MySQL treats
+-- NULLs as distinct, so any number of closed reports coexist while at most one
+-- open one can. That is what §5.6's prose actually asks for — "one open report per
+-- (target, reporter)".
+--
+-- NULL reporters (deleted accounts) are distinct for the same reason, which is
+-- also wanted: nothing should collapse two dead accounts' reports into one.
+--
+-- `handled_note` is not in the design doc and earns its place: a queue whose
+-- resolution reason lives only in an activity_log line is one where the next
+-- staffer to see a repeat report cannot find out why the last one was dismissed.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS content_reports (
+  id           INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
+  target_type  VARCHAR(32)  NOT NULL,          -- 'team_forum_post' | 'team_forum_thread' | 'team_forum_upload'
+  target_id    BIGINT       NOT NULL,
+  team_id      INT          NULL,              -- denormalised for the queue's filters
+  reporter_user_id INT      NULL,
+  reporter_username VARCHAR(32) NULL,          -- snapshot (§2.10): who raised it survives the account
+  reason       ENUM('spam','abuse','sexual','illegal','impersonation','other') NOT NULL,
+  detail       VARCHAR(500) NULL,
+  status       ENUM('open','reviewing','actioned','dismissed') NOT NULL DEFAULT 'open',
+  handled_by   INT          NULL,
+  handled_username VARCHAR(32) NULL,           -- snapshot, same reason
+  handled_note VARCHAR(500) NULL,
+  handled_at   DATETIME NULL,
+  created_at   DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  open_marker  TINYINT(1) AS (IF(status IN ('open','reviewing'), 1, NULL)) STORED,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_cr_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_cr_reporter FOREIGN KEY (reporter_user_id) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_cr_handler FOREIGN KEY (handled_by) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  UNIQUE KEY uq_cr_one_open (target_type, target_id, reporter_user_id, open_marker),
+  INDEX idx_cr_queue (status, created_at),
+  INDEX idx_cr_team (team_id, created_at)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- The §2.9 approval queue. A MODERATOR performing one of the three actions that
+-- publish untrusted game-sourced strings creates a pending row here; an ADMIN
+-- performing one applies it immediately. Rows are kept after a decision — "a
+-- moderator asked to publish this name and an admin refused" is the record worth
+-- having.
+--
+-- `action` + `payload` means a fourth gated action is an enum value rather than a
+-- schema change. That is room to extend, not an invitation: nothing else is gated
+-- today, and nothing should be without asking §2.9's question first.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_moderation_requests (
+  id            INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
+  team_id       INT          NOT NULL,
+  action        ENUM('unhide','display_name_override','clear_display_name_override') NOT NULL,
+  payload       JSON         NULL,             -- e.g. { "displayName": "…" }
+  reason        VARCHAR(255) NULL,
+  requested_by  INT          NULL,
+  requested_username VARCHAR(32) NULL,         -- snapshot (§2.10)
+  requested_at  DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  status        ENUM('pending','approved','rejected','withdrawn') NOT NULL DEFAULT 'pending',
+  decided_by    INT          NULL,
+  decided_username VARCHAR(32) NULL,
+  decided_at    DATETIME NULL,
+  decision_note VARCHAR(255) NULL,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tmr_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tmr_requested_by FOREIGN KEY (requested_by) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tmr_decided_by FOREIGN KEY (decided_by) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  INDEX idx_tmr_queue (status, requested_at)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- The per-Team activity feed (TEAMS.md §4.2, phase 3). Two writers, one table:
+-- core writes its own membership and rename items with source='core', and a module
+-- pushes game items through ctx.teams.activity.push with source=<moduleId>. That
+-- core writes here too is deliberate — the rendering path is exercised by core's
+-- own content from day one, so the feed is never empty on a deployment whose
+-- module pushes nothing.
+--
+-- `summary` is ALREADY-RENDERED text and core never composes one (§4.1). Core
+-- cannot phrase "gained 15,000 gold" for a game whose vocabulary it does not know,
+-- and a core that templated it would have re-acquired exactly the game semantics
+-- the module system exists to remove. `kind` and `payload` are likewise opaque:
+-- core stores and filters them, and only the module's `team.overview` slot renders
+-- anything richer than the text.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_activity (
+  id           BIGINT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
+  team_id      INT          NOT NULL,
+  source       VARCHAR(32)  NOT NULL,           -- 'core' or a module id
+  kind         VARCHAR(64)  NOT NULL,           -- namespaced <source>.<name>, opaque to core
+  summary      VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,           -- module-rendered; core never composes one
+  -- Defaults to 'members' — fail closed. The module CHOOSES visibility per item;
+  -- core ENFORCES it on the read path. Same shape as a module owning the
+  -- public-safety filter for its push streams (MODULE_API.md §2.4).
+  visibility   ENUM('public','members') NOT NULL DEFAULT 'members',
+  actor_member_key VARCHAR(191) NULL,
+  actor_user_id    INT      NULL,
+  payload      JSON         NULL,               -- opaque; rendered only by the module's slot
+  occurred_at  DATETIME     NOT NULL,           -- when it happened in the game, not when it arrived
+  -- Optional idempotence key. INSERT IGNORE against this unique index is the same
+  -- trick shard_events already uses, and it is what makes a sidecar reconnect
+  -- backfill safe: replaying a window of events re-posts nothing.
+  dedupe_key   CHAR(40)     NULL,
+  created_at   DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_team_activity_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  -- Actor is SET NULL, not CASCADE (§2.10): deleting an account must not delete the
+  -- Team's history of what happened, only the attribution.
+  CONSTRAINT fk_team_activity_actor FOREIGN KEY (actor_user_id) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+  UNIQUE KEY uq_team_activity_dedupe (team_id, dedupe_key),
+  INDEX idx_team_activity_feed (team_id, occurred_at)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- Per-Team notification preference (TEAMS.md §6.3/§6.4, phase 6). OPT-OUT, not
+-- opt-in: a user in a single Team must never have to configure anything, so the
+-- absence of a row is the default and every column here is a deviation from it.
+--
+-- Team scoping lives HERE and in the recipient computation, never in a stream id.
+-- The push catalog is a static registration validated at boot against a namespaced
+-- pattern; it cannot express one stream per Team, and stream ids are stored in
+-- notification_subscriptions rows that would then need garbage-collecting every
+-- time a Team archived. Four fixed streams plus this table is the same feature
+-- with nothing to collect.
+--
+-- `last_digest_at` is the digest's ONLY state. There is no queue of pending items:
+-- the worker asks what arrived after this timestamp and re-runs the access
+-- resolver, so a deployment that was down for a day sends one correct digest
+-- rather than replaying a backlog, and a user who lost forum access between the
+-- post and the send is not emailed content they can no longer read.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_notification_prefs (
+  user_id        INT NOT NULL,
+  team_id        INT NOT NULL,
+  muted          TINYINT(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
+  -- 'off', and NOT the design-of-record's 'digest'. Digest-by-default would mean
+  -- every member of every Team starts receiving daily mail the moment an operator
+  -- connects Gmail, which is a decision about other people's inboxes made on their
+  -- behalf. Email is therefore the one sink here that is opt-IN; the mute is still
+  -- opt-out, because a mute silences something the user already asked for.
+  --
+  -- It also keeps this column honest as a deviation-from-default: a row written to
+  -- set `muted` alone leaves email exactly where it was.
+  email_mode     ENUM('off','digest','immediate') NOT NULL DEFAULT 'off',
+  last_digest_at DATETIME NULL,
+  updated_at     DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  PRIMARY KEY (user_id, team_id),
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tnp_user FOREIGN KEY (user_id) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tnp_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  -- The digest worker's driving query is "rows in digest mode, oldest send first",
+  -- which is a scan of this index rather than of every preference ever written.
+  INDEX idx_tnp_digest (email_mode, last_digest_at)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- ── The integration bridge's configuration (TEAMS.md §7.2, phase 8) ─────────
+--
+-- The SAME events as §6, delivered to a second consumer. Not a second pipeline:
+-- `utils/teamNotify.js` computes the recipient set once and hands the event to
+-- push, to email and now to this bridge.
+--
+-- `team_id NULL` is the deployment-wide default and a per-Team row overrides it,
+-- which is what §7.2 asks for — but its `PRIMARY KEY (platform, team_id)` cannot
+-- express it: MariaDB coerces every PRIMARY KEY column to NOT NULL, so the
+-- default row is unrepresentable and the whole override mechanism has no base
+-- case. Hence the surrogate key plus a generated `team_key`, the same trick
+-- `teams.active_key` and `content_reports.open_marker` use: IFNULL folds the
+-- default row onto 0, which no `teams.id` can be, so one default and one row per
+-- Team coexist under a single UNIQUE key. It also buys the foreign key the
+-- original DDL had no room for — without it, deleting a Team leaves its bridge
+-- config behind to be inherited by the next Team that lands on the id.
+--
+-- **`members_ack` is a precondition, not a preference.** Forum posts and
+-- announcements are members-only ALWAYS — there is no public forum thread, and
+-- §7.2's gate ("visibility is public, or the channel is configured for a
+-- members-only context") has no data source on either side: the streams carry no
+-- visibility and core cannot see a Discord channel's permissions. Only the
+-- operator can. So enabling a members-only event requires an explicit, attributed
+-- acknowledgement that the destination is restricted to that Team, recorded the
+-- way `teams_forum_uploads_ack` records the image-policy one. Changing the channel
+-- CLEARS it (see the model): an acknowledgement is about a destination, and it
+-- cannot survive the destination changing underneath it.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_integration_config (
+  id           INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
+  platform     VARCHAR(32)  NOT NULL,          -- 'discord'; opaque here, phase 10 makes it a registry key
+  team_id      INT          NULL,              -- NULL = the deployment-wide default
+  events       JSON         NOT NULL,          -- ['team.announcement','team.forum.post']
+  channel_ref  VARCHAR(64)  NULL,              -- destination on that platform, opaque to core
+  enabled      TINYINT(1)   NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
+  -- The §7.2 gate, as an operator assertion with a name against it.
+  members_ack     TINYINT(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
+  members_ack_by  INT      NULL,
+  members_ack_at  DATETIME NULL,
+  updated_at   DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  team_key     INT AS (IFNULL(team_id, 0)) STORED,
+  UNIQUE KEY uq_tic_platform_team (platform, team_key),
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tic_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+  -- SET NULL rather than CASCADE, for the same reason every other snapshot in
+  -- this file is: deleting the admin's account must not silently un-acknowledge a
+  -- policy and start withholding messages the deployment is configured to send.
+  CONSTRAINT fk_tic_ack_by FOREIGN KEY (members_ack_by) REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
+-- ── Per-Team external resources: the voice channel (TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9) ─
+--
+-- One row per (Team, platform, resource). Today the only resource is 'voice',
+-- and the column exists because the NEXT one — a text channel, a Matrix room —
+-- is the same lifecycle with a different noun, and phase 10's capability
+-- registry needs somewhere to say which resources a platform declares.
+--
+-- **Access is a per-Team ROLE, not per-member overwrites.** §7.3 designed
+-- overwrites-by-default with escalation to a role above ~90 members; the org lead
+-- settled on roles always (2026-08-18). That deletes `voice_overwrite_max` and the
+-- mode transition, and it moves the ceiling: the binding limit is no longer ~100
+-- overwrites on one channel but Discord's guild-wide cap of 250 roles, which the
+-- admin panel surfaces rather than letting a create fail into `state='error'`.
+-- `role_ref` is therefore NOT the escalation artefact it was in §7.3 — it is the
+-- grant itself, and a row with a channel and no role is a broken row.
+--
+-- **Two external refs, two lifetimes, and the pair is why this is a table rather
+-- than two columns on `teams`.** A channel can be deleted in Discord while the
+-- role survives, and vice versa; the reconciler has to be able to say "the role is
+-- there, the channel is not" and repair one without touching the other.
+--
+-- `state` is core's belief about Discord, never Discord's own answer: the
+-- reconciler writes what it just did, and the next pass re-derives the truth. A
+-- Team dropping below the threshold goes to 'pending_removal' with `remove_after`
+-- set rather than being deleted at once (§7.3's grace window) — a Team hovering
+-- around the threshold would otherwise delete-and-recreate, changing the channel
+-- id and breaking every pinned link to it, and a voice channel holds no message
+-- history, so the window costs nothing to keep.
+CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS team_integrations (
+  id           INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
+  team_id      INT         NOT NULL,
+  platform     VARCHAR(32) NOT NULL,             -- 'discord'; opaque here, a registry key in phase 10
+  resource     VARCHAR(32) NOT NULL,             -- 'voice'
+  external_ref VARCHAR(64) NULL,                 -- the channel id
+  role_ref     VARCHAR(64) NULL,                 -- the Team's own role; the grant itself, not an escalation
+  state        ENUM('none','active','pending_removal','error') NOT NULL DEFAULT 'none',
+  remove_after DATETIME     NULL,                -- set with 'pending_removal'; the grace window's expiry
+  last_error   VARCHAR(500) NULL,
+  synced_at    DATETIME     NULL,                -- last pass that reached Discord and was believed
+  updated_at   DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
+  UNIQUE KEY uq_team_integration (team_id, platform, resource),
+  -- Expiry is swept across every Team, so the index is on the pair the sweep
+  -- filters by rather than on the Team the unique key already covers.
+  INDEX idx_ti_pending (state, remove_after),
+  CONSTRAINT fk_ti_team FOREIGN KEY (team_id) REFERENCES teams(id) ON DELETE CASCADE
+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
+
 -- Migrations for databases created before the wiki upgrade. Each statement uses
 -- IF NOT EXISTS so re-running on every boot is a harmless no-op. New installs get
 -- these columns from the CREATE TABLE above; existing installs get them here.
@@ -875,6 +1430,12 @@ ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS last_login_ip VARCHAR(45) NULL;
 -- so the system behaves exactly as today until an admin opts in.
 INSERT IGNORE INTO settings (`key`, value) VALUES ('player_registration', 'disabled');
 
+-- Team forum post edit window, in minutes (TEAMS.md §5.4, phase 5). Seeded rather
+-- than left absent so the value an operator sees on the settings screen is the
+-- value in force — an empty field that silently behaves as 15 is a field nobody
+-- trusts. INSERT IGNORE, so an operator who has already changed it keeps theirs.
+INSERT IGNORE INTO settings (`key`, value) VALUES ('teams_forum_edit_window_minutes', '15');
+
 ALTER TABLE wiki_pages ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS excerpt VARCHAR(400) NULL;
 ALTER TABLE wiki_pages ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS category_id INT NULL;
 ALTER TABLE wiki_pages ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS published TINYINT(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 1;

server/routes.guards.json

@@ -345,6 +345,26 @@
         "requireAuth"
       ]
     },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/moderation/reports",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/moderation/reports/:id/handle",
+      "handlers": 5,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
     {
       "method": "GET",
       "path": "/api/v1/admin/moderation/search",
@@ -730,6 +750,247 @@
         "validate"
       ]
     },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams",
+      "handlers": 3,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id",
+      "handlers": 3,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/archive",
+      "handlers": 4,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/display-name",
+      "handlers": 5,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/forum/moderation",
+      "handlers": 3,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/grants",
+      "handlers": 3,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/hide",
+      "handlers": 4,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/leader-override",
+      "handlers": 6,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "DELETE",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/leader-override/:memberKey",
+      "handlers": 4,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/unhide",
+      "handlers": 4,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/forum/settings",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/forum/uploads",
+      "handlers": 5,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/integrations",
+      "handlers": 2,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "PUT",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/integrations",
+      "handlers": 8,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "DELETE",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/integrations/:teamId",
+      "handlers": 4,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/requests",
+      "handlers": 3,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/requests/:id/decide",
+      "handlers": 5,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/resync",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/review",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/voice",
+      "handlers": 2,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "PUT",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/voice",
+      "handlers": 7,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "DELETE",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/voice/:teamId",
+      "handlers": 4,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/voice/sync",
+      "handlers": 2,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
     {
       "method": "POST",
       "path": "/api/v1/admin/uploads",
@@ -1197,6 +1458,26 @@
         "validate"
       ]
     },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/auth/me/notifications/teams",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "PUT",
+      "path": "/api/v1/auth/me/notifications/teams",
+      "handlers": 6,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
     {
       "method": "GET",
       "path": "/api/v1/auth/me/sessions",
@@ -1499,6 +1780,162 @@
         "requireAuth"
       ]
     },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/access",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "PATCH",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/posts/:id",
+      "handlers": 5,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/posts/:id/moderate",
+      "handlers": 5,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/report",
+      "handlers": 7,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/threads",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/threads",
+      "handlers": 7,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/threads/:id",
+      "handlers": 3,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/threads/:id/moderate",
+      "handlers": 5,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/threads/:id/posts",
+      "handlers": 5,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/uploads",
+      "handlers": 3,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "multerMiddleware"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "DELETE",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/uploads/:id",
+      "handlers": 3,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/grants",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/grants",
+      "handlers": 6,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "DELETE",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/grants/:userId",
+      "handlers": 5,
+      "gates": [
+        "noindex",
+        "requireAuth",
+        "middleware",
+        "validate"
+      ]
+    },
     {
       "method": "POST",
       "path": "/api/v1/public/contact",
@@ -1556,6 +1993,60 @@
       "handlers": 1,
       "gates": []
     },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams",
+      "handlers": 2,
+      "gates": [
+        "siteMode"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/:slug",
+      "handlers": 2,
+      "gates": [
+        "siteMode"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/:slug/activity",
+      "handlers": 3,
+      "gates": [
+        "siteMode",
+        "optionalAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/:slug/members",
+      "handlers": 3,
+      "gates": [
+        "siteMode",
+        "optionalAuth"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/by-external/:moduleId/:externalId",
+      "handlers": 2,
+      "gates": [
+        "siteMode"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/unsubscribe/:token",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": []
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/unsubscribe/:token",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": []
+    },
     {
       "method": "GET",
       "path": "/api/v1/public/version",
@@ -1627,6 +2118,22 @@
       "gates": [
         "requireInternalKey"
       ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/internal/commands",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": [
+        "requireInternalKey"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/internal/commands/dispatch",
+      "handlers": 1,
+      "gates": [
+        "requireInternalKey"
+      ]
     }
   ]
 }

server/routes.manifest.json

@@ -145,6 +145,14 @@
       "method": "GET",
       "path": "/api/v1/admin/moderation/recent"
     },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/moderation/reports"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/moderation/reports/:id/handle"
+    },
     {
       "method": "GET",
       "path": "/api/v1/admin/moderation/search"
@@ -293,6 +301,98 @@
       "method": "PUT",
       "path": "/api/v1/admin/site-mode"
     },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/archive"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/display-name"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/forum/moderation"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/grants"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/hide"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/leader-override"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "DELETE",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/leader-override/:memberKey"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/:id/unhide"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/forum/settings"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/forum/uploads"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/integrations"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "PUT",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/integrations"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "DELETE",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/integrations/:teamId"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/requests"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/requests/:id/decide"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/resync"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/review"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/voice"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "PUT",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/voice"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "DELETE",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/voice/:teamId"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/admin/teams/voice/sync"
+    },
     {
       "method": "POST",
       "path": "/api/v1/admin/uploads"
@@ -477,6 +577,14 @@
       "method": "PUT",
       "path": "/api/v1/auth/me/notifications/subscriptions"
     },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/auth/me/notifications/teams"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "PUT",
+      "path": "/api/v1/auth/me/notifications/teams"
+    },
     {
       "method": "GET",
       "path": "/api/v1/auth/me/sessions"
@@ -605,6 +713,66 @@
       "method": "GET",
       "path": "/api/v1/player/appeals/eligible"
     },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/access"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "PATCH",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/posts/:id"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/posts/:id/moderate"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/report"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/threads"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/threads"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/threads/:id"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/threads/:id/moderate"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/threads/:id/posts"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/uploads"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "DELETE",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/forum/uploads/:id"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/grants"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/grants"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "DELETE",
+      "path": "/api/v1/player/teams/:slug/grants/:userId"
+    },
     {
       "method": "POST",
       "path": "/api/v1/public/contact"
@@ -637,6 +805,34 @@
       "method": "GET",
       "path": "/api/v1/public/status"
     },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/:slug"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/:slug/activity"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/:slug/members"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/by-external/:moduleId/:externalId"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/unsubscribe/:token"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/api/v1/public/teams/unsubscribe/:token"
+    },
     {
       "method": "GET",
       "path": "/api/v1/public/version"
@@ -674,6 +870,14 @@
     {
       "method": "GET",
       "path": "/internal/bot-config"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/internal/commands"
+    },
+    {
+      "method": "POST",
+      "path": "/internal/commands/dispatch"
     }
   ]
 }

server/src/auth/session.middleware.js

@@ -79,6 +79,44 @@ async function requireAuth(req, res, next) {
   }
 }
 
+// Best-effort AUTHENTICATION, as opposed to attachSession's best-effort decode.
+//
+// For a PUBLIC route whose content — not merely its presentation — depends on who
+// is asking. The Team activity feed is the first: `public` items go to everyone
+// and `members` items only to members and forum-granted users (TEAMS.md §4.3), so
+// an anonymous caller must be served, not rejected, and an authenticated one must
+// be identified properly.
+//
+// "Properly" is why this is not attachSession. That one decodes the token and
+// stops, which is right for reading back your own session but wrong here: a
+// banned account, a password change, or a logout would all keep working against
+// the private half of the feed until the JWT expired. This runs the same
+// database re-validation requireAuth does — status, cutoff, revocation — and on
+// any failure continues ANONYMOUSLY rather than 401ing. A caller whose session is
+// no longer good sees the public feed, which is exactly what they are entitled to.
+//
+// A database error also degrades to anonymous. On a public route the safe
+// direction is to serve less, and 500ing a page because a session lookup failed
+// would take the whole Team page down for callers who never sent a token.
+async function optionalAuth(req, res, next) {
+  const session = sessionService.validateSession(req)
+  if (!session) return next()
+  try {
+    const user = await users.getById(session.userId)
+    if (!user) return next()
+    if (user.status && user.status !== 'active') return next()
+    if (isBeforeCutoff(session, user.tokens_valid_after)) return next()
+    if (await sessionService.isSessionRevoked(session.sessionId)) return next()
+
+    req.user = user
+    req.session = session
+    req.authMethod = session.authMethod
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.warn('optionalAuth: continuing anonymously', { message: err.message })
+  }
+  return next()
+}
+
 // Gate middleware factory: allow only the listed roles. Assumes requireAuth ran
 // first so req.user is populated. Use for admin-only endpoints (users, site
 // mode, settings) so a lower-privilege editor cannot reach them.
@@ -91,6 +129,7 @@ function requireRole(...roles) {
 
 module.exports = {
   attachSession,
+  optionalAuth,
   requireAuth,
   requireRole,
 }

server/src/config/coreStreams.js

@@ -2,13 +2,18 @@
 //
 // What is left of config/notificationStreams.js once the shard-derived catalog
 // moved to config/shardStreams.js (MODULE_SYSTEM.md §1.8: push INFRASTRUCTURE is
-// core, the CATALOG is content). Exactly one stream is core's: `news.post` is
-// produced by the website's own posts path, not by any game feed.
+// core, the CATALOG is content). `news.post` is produced by the website's own
+// posts path, not by any game feed, and the four `team.*` streams by core's own
+// Team sync and forum.
 //
 // Registered through modules/registries.js like any module's, and read back
 // through it — nothing imports this file to get "the catalog", because the
 // catalog is core's plus every module's.
 //
+// Phase 6 added the four Team streams below. They are core's for the same reason
+// the Team tables are: a module supplies who is in a Team, but who may be told
+// about it is the access resolver's answer, and that is core's (TEAMS.md Part 6).
+//
 // The payload that ever leaves the server is a CONTENT-FREE tickle
 // ({ stream, ref }); the app wakes and PULLS the real, ownership-checked content
 // over the authenticated API (docs/android/PLAN.md §11).
@@ -21,6 +26,55 @@ const STREAMS = [
     personal: false,
     requiresLinkedAccount: false,
   },
+  // ── Teams (TEAMS.md §6.2, phase 6) ───────────────────────────────────────
+  //
+  // FOUR streams, and not one per Team. The catalog is a static registration
+  // validated at boot; it has no way to express an unbounded runtime-created set,
+  // and a stream id per Team would leave rows in notification_subscriptions to
+  // collect every time a Team archived. Which Team an event came from lives in
+  // the RECIPIENT SET (utils/teamNotify.js) and in the `ref`, never in the id.
+  //
+  // `requiresLinkedAccount: false` on all four is deliberate and reads oddly.
+  // These are game-sourced events, so the instinct is to demand a linked game
+  // account — but a forum-granted user with no game identity at all is exactly
+  // the population §2.5 path 3 exists for, and they are a legitimate recipient of
+  // `team.forum.post`. The flag would refuse them a toggle they have every right
+  // to. What enforces who gets what is the recipient computation, which asks the
+  // access resolver; the stream flag is not a second, weaker copy of that rule.
+  //
+  // `personal: false` for the same reason it is false on news.post: these are not
+  // owner-keyed events about one account's own property. `publishToUsers` is a
+  // third fan-out shape alongside "everyone subscribed" and "this one owner", and
+  // the catalog has no flag for it because the flag would say nothing a caller
+  // does not already know by choosing the function.
+  {
+    id: 'team.member.joined',
+    label: 'Team — new member',
+    description: 'Someone joined a Team you belong to.',
+    personal: false,
+    requiresLinkedAccount: false,
+  },
+  {
+    id: 'team.leadership.changed',
+    label: 'Team — leadership change',
+    description: 'Leadership changed in a Team you belong to.',
+    personal: false,
+    requiresLinkedAccount: false,
+  },
+  {
+    id: 'team.forum.post',
+    label: 'Team — new forum post',
+    description: 'A new thread or reply in a Team forum you can read.',
+    personal: false,
+    requiresLinkedAccount: false,
+  },
+  {
+    id: 'team.announcement',
+    label: 'Team — announcements',
+    description: 'A leader posted an announcement in a Team you can read.',
+    personal: false,
+    requiresLinkedAccount: false,
+  },
 ]
 
 module.exports = { STREAMS }

server/src/model/pushDevices/pushDevices.db.js

@@ -48,4 +48,44 @@ const endpointsForUserStream = (userId, streamId) =>
     [userId, streamId],
   )
 
-module.exports = { upsert, getByUserEndpoint, listByUser, remove, endpointsForStream, endpointsForUserStream }
+// `Number.isInteger` alone is not enough: `Number(null)` is 0 and 0 is an
+// integer, so a null slipping into a caller's list would become user id 0 and
+// ride into an IN clause. No row has id 0, so it is harmless today — which is
+// exactly why it would never be noticed.
+const isUserId = (n) => Number.isInteger(n) && n > 0
+
+// Endpoints of a COMPUTED SET of users' devices, each still gated on that user's
+// own subscription (TEAMS.md §6.2's third fan-out shape).
+//
+// The set is the whole Team-scoping mechanism: the four `team.*` streams are
+// global, and which Team an event belongs to is expressed by who is in `userIds`
+// rather than by a stream id per Team. The caller has already resolved access and
+// subtracted mutes; this function's only remaining job is to honour each
+// recipient's own opt-in, which is why the JOIN is here and not left to the
+// caller — a fan-out that skipped it would deliver to a user who had turned the
+// stream off.
+//
+// Returns [] for an empty set rather than building `IN ()`, which is a syntax
+// error in MariaDB. That case is common, not exceptional: most Team events have
+// no subscribed recipients on a deployment with no app installed at all.
+async function endpointsForUsersStream(userIds, streamId) {
+  const ids = [...new Set((userIds || []).map(Number).filter(isUserId))]
+  if (ids.length === 0) return []
+  return query(
+    `SELECT d.endpoint, d.transport
+       FROM push_devices d
+       JOIN notification_subscriptions s ON s.user_id = d.user_id
+      WHERE s.stream_id = ? AND d.user_id IN (${ids.map(() => '?').join(',')})`,
+    [streamId, ...ids],
+  )
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  upsert,
+  getByUserEndpoint,
+  listByUser,
+  remove,
+  endpointsForStream,
+  endpointsForUserStream,
+  endpointsForUsersStream,
+}

server/src/model/pushDevices/pushDevices.model.js

@@ -28,5 +28,13 @@ const remove = async (id, userId) => (await db.remove(id, userId)) > 0
 // Fan-out helpers: raw { endpoint, transport } rows (not toSafe-shaped).
 const endpointsForStream = (streamId) => db.endpointsForStream(streamId)
 const endpointsForUserStream = (userId, streamId) => db.endpointsForUserStream(userId, streamId)
+const endpointsForUsersStream = (userIds, streamId) => db.endpointsForUsersStream(userIds, streamId)
 
-module.exports = { register, listForUser, remove, endpointsForStream, endpointsForUserStream }
+module.exports = {
+  register,
+  listForUser,
+  remove,
+  endpointsForStream,
+  endpointsForUserStream,
+  endpointsForUsersStream,
+}

server/src/model/reports/contentReports.db.js

@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+// SQL for `content_reports` (TEAMS.md §5.6).
+//
+// Not under model/teams/ even though Team forum content is its only consumer
+// today: the table is deliberately generic — `target_type` is a VARCHAR so that a
+// wiki page or a news comment becomes a new value rather than a new table — and
+// filing it under a feature it will outgrow is how the next consumer ends up
+// building its own.
+//
+// Nothing here decides who may read a report. That is the route's job, and there
+// is exactly one answer: site staff (§5.6, and the org lead's 2026-08-18 ruling
+// that reports are site administration only).
+
+const { query } = require('../../utils/db')
+
+const COLUMNS = `
+  id, target_type, target_id, team_id, reporter_user_id, reporter_username,
+  reason, detail, status, handled_by, handled_username, handled_note, handled_at,
+  created_at`
+
+const OPEN_STATUSES = ['open', 'reviewing']
+
+/**
+ * File a report.
+ *
+ * The duplicate is caught by the unique key rather than by a SELECT first, which
+ * is the difference between "usually not a duplicate" and "never a duplicate":
+ * two taps of a report button race, and only the index settles it. ER_DUP_ENTRY
+ * comes back as a clean `null` so the caller can answer 409 without knowing what
+ * a MySQL error code looks like.
+ */
+async function insert({ targetType, targetId, teamId, reporterUserId, reporterUsername, reason, detail }) {
+  try {
+    const res = await query(
+      `INSERT INTO content_reports
+         (target_type, target_id, team_id, reporter_user_id, reporter_username, reason, detail)
+       VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+      [targetType, targetId, teamId ?? null, reporterUserId, reporterUsername, reason, detail ?? null],
+    )
+    return res.insertId
+  } catch (err) {
+    if (err && (err.code === 'ER_DUP_ENTRY' || err.errno === 1062)) return null
+    throw err
+  }
+}
+
+async function byId(id) {
+  const rows = await query(`SELECT ${COLUMNS} FROM content_reports WHERE id = ? LIMIT 1`, [id])
+  return rows[0] || null
+}
+
+/**
+ * The queue.
+ *
+ * `status` defaults to the two OPEN statuses rather than to everything: a staffer
+ * opening the queue wants the work, not the archive. 'all' is the explicit escape
+ * hatch and every single status is selectable, so nothing is unreachable.
+ */
+async function list({ status, teamId, limit = 100, offset = 0 } = {}) {
+  const where = []
+  const args = []
+  if (status && status !== 'all') {
+    where.push('status = ?')
+    args.push(status)
+  } else if (!status) {
+    where.push(`status IN (${OPEN_STATUSES.map(() => '?').join(',')})`)
+    args.push(...OPEN_STATUSES)
+  }
+  if (teamId) {
+    where.push('team_id = ?')
+    args.push(teamId)
+  }
+  args.push(limit, offset)
+  return query(
+    `SELECT ${COLUMNS} FROM content_reports
+      ${where.length ? `WHERE ${where.join(' AND ')}` : ''}
+      ORDER BY created_at DESC, id DESC LIMIT ? OFFSET ?`,
+    args,
+  )
+}
+
+/** How many are waiting, for the dashboard badge. */
+async function openCount() {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT COUNT(*) AS n FROM content_reports WHERE status IN (${OPEN_STATUSES.map(() => '?').join(',')})`,
+    OPEN_STATUSES,
+  )
+  return Number(rows[0]?.n || 0)
+}
+
+/**
+ * Record a staffer's decision.
+ *
+ * `handled_*` is stamped for every status including `reviewing`, so "who has this"
+ * is answerable while it is in progress and not only after it is closed — that is
+ * what stops two staffers working the same report.
+ */
+async function handle(id, { status, handledBy, handledUsername, note }) {
+  const res = await query(
+    `UPDATE content_reports
+        SET status = ?, handled_by = ?, handled_username = ?, handled_note = ?, handled_at = NOW()
+      WHERE id = ?`,
+    [status, handledBy, handledUsername, note ?? null, id],
+  )
+  return res.affectedRows > 0
+}
+
+// ── target enrichment ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+//
+// Three batched reads rather than one per row. §5.6's fourth rule — "reports on
+// uploads carry the team_forum_uploads row, so a staffer sees uploader, size and
+// sniffed type without hunting" — is the reason the queue enriches at all, and a
+// queue that N+1s to do it would be the version that gets turned off.
+
+async function threadsByIds(ids) {
+  if (!ids.length) return []
+  return query(
+    `SELECT id, team_id, title, type, status, created_username FROM team_forum_threads
+      WHERE id IN (${ids.map(() => '?').join(',')})`,
+    ids,
+  )
+}
+
+async function postsByIds(ids) {
+  if (!ids.length) return []
+  return query(
+    `SELECT p.id, p.thread_id, p.author_user_id, p.author_username, p.body_html, p.status,
+            p.created_at, t.team_id, t.title AS thread_title
+       FROM team_forum_posts p JOIN team_forum_threads t ON t.id = p.thread_id
+      WHERE p.id IN (${ids.map(() => '?').join(',')})`,
+    ids,
+  )
+}
+
+async function uploadsByIds(ids) {
+  if (!ids.length) return []
+  return query(
+    `SELECT id, team_id, post_id, uploader_user_id, uploader_username, filename,
+            mimetype, byte_size, created_at, deleted_at
+       FROM team_forum_uploads WHERE id IN (${ids.map(() => '?').join(',')})`,
+    ids,
+  )
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  OPEN_STATUSES,
+  insert,
+  byId,
+  list,
+  openCount,
+  handle,
+  threadsByIds,
+  postsByIds,
+  uploadsByIds,
+}

server/src/model/reports/contentReports.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+// ── Abuse reports: the missing half of moderation (TEAMS.md §5.6) ──────────
+//
+// Two rules shape everything in this file, and both are easier to break than to
+// notice broken:
+//
+//   1. **A report is not a moderation action.** Filing one changes nothing about
+//      the content — it opens a queue item. That keeps it clear of §5.3's
+//      leader/staff moderation ledger, which records things that actually
+//      happened. If reporting hid a post, reporting would BE moderation, and the
+//      first person to work that out would have found a way to hide anything.
+//
+//   2. **Reports go to site staff and to nobody else.** The gap §5.6 exists to
+//      close has a specific shape: leaders moderate their own Team's forum, and a
+//      Team's leaders are exactly the people who will not report their own Team.
+//      A leader-visible queue would route a complaint about a leader back to that
+//      leader. The org lead settled this on 2026-08-18 — reports are **site
+//      administration only**, with no leader-facing view at all, not even a
+//      read-only one scoped to their own Team.
+//
+// The reporter's ACCESS is the caller's business, not this file's: the player
+// route resolves the forum first, so anyone reaching `file()` is someone who can
+// already see the thing they are reporting. What this file does check is that the
+// target is really in the Team the caller reached it through — otherwise a
+// participant in one Team could file reports carrying another Team's id, and the
+// queue's per-Team filter would quietly be lying.
+
+const reportsDb = require('./contentReports.db')
+const forumDb = require('../teams/teamForum.db')
+
+const TARGET_TYPES = ['team_forum_thread', 'team_forum_post', 'team_forum_upload']
+const REASONS = ['spam', 'abuse', 'sexual', 'illegal', 'impersonation', 'other']
+const STATUSES = ['open', 'reviewing', 'actioned', 'dismissed']
+
+// A body excerpt for the queue, not a rendered post. Staff triage on what was
+// written, and `body_html` is stored already sanitised — but the queue is a list,
+// so it gets text and a length cap rather than markup.
+const EXCERPT_CHARS = 300
+const excerpt = (html) => String(html || '')
+  .replace(/<[^>]*>/g, ' ')
+  .replace(/\s+/g, ' ')
+  .trim()
+  .slice(0, EXCERPT_CHARS)
+
+/**
+ * Does this target exist, and is it in this Team?
+ *
+ * Returns the team id the target really belongs to, or null. The caller compares
+ * it with the Team the request came through — a mismatch is a 404 for the same
+ * §5.5.1 reason a foreign thread id is: confirming a target exists somewhere else
+ * on the site is itself a disclosure.
+ */
+async function targetTeamId(targetType, targetId) {
+  if (targetType === 'team_forum_thread') {
+    const thread = await forumDb.threadById(targetId)
+    return thread ? thread.team_id : null
+  }
+  if (targetType === 'team_forum_post') {
+    const post = await forumDb.postById(targetId)
+    if (!post) return null
+    const thread = await forumDb.threadById(post.thread_id)
+    return thread ? thread.team_id : null
+  }
+  if (targetType === 'team_forum_upload') {
+    const upload = await forumDb.uploadById(targetId)
+    return upload ? upload.team_id : null
+  }
+  return null
+}
+
+/**
+ * File a report.
+ *
+ * A duplicate answers 409 rather than pretending to succeed. Silently accepting
+ * it would be friendlier for one tap and dishonest for the second: a member who
+ * reports twice because nothing seemed to happen deserves to be told the first
+ * one is already in the queue.
+ */
+async function file({ team, actor, targetType, targetId, reason, detail }) {
+  if (!TARGET_TYPES.includes(targetType)) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'Unknown report target' }
+  }
+  if (!REASONS.includes(reason)) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'Unknown report reason' }
+  }
+
+  const owner = await targetTeamId(targetType, targetId)
+  if (owner == null || owner !== team.id) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'Not found' }
+  }
+
+  const id = await reportsDb.insert({
+    targetType,
+    targetId,
+    teamId: team.id,
+    reporterUserId: actor.id,
+    reporterUsername: actor.username,
+    reason,
+    detail,
+  })
+  if (id == null) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 409, error: 'You have already reported this. Staff are looking at it.' }
+  }
+  return { ok: true, reportId: id }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The staff queue, with each row's target attached.
+ *
+ * Enrichment is three batched reads keyed by target type, not one read per row.
+ * The alternative N+1s a page of a hundred into three hundred queries, which is
+ * how a queue becomes a thing staff avoid opening.
+ *
+ * A target that has since been hard-deleted comes back as `null`, and the report
+ * still lists. That is deliberate: "somebody reported this and by the time we
+ * looked it was gone" is a fact a moderator needs, and dropping the row would
+ * hide the pattern of a member deleting their own content the moment it is
+ * reported.
+ */
+async function queue({ status, teamId, limit, offset } = {}) {
+  const rows = await reportsDb.list({ status, teamId, limit, offset })
+  if (!rows.length) return []
+
+  const idsOf = (type) => rows.filter((r) => r.target_type === type).map((r) => Number(r.target_id))
+  const [threads, posts, uploads] = await Promise.all([
+    reportsDb.threadsByIds([...new Set(idsOf('team_forum_thread'))]),
+    reportsDb.postsByIds([...new Set(idsOf('team_forum_post'))]),
+    reportsDb.uploadsByIds([...new Set(idsOf('team_forum_upload'))]),
+  ])
+
+  const byId = (list) => new Map(list.map((row) => [Number(row.id), row]))
+  const threadMap = byId(threads)
+  const postMap = byId(posts)
+  const uploadMap = byId(uploads)
+
+  return rows.map((r) => ({ ...publicReport(r), target: describeTarget(r, { threadMap, postMap, uploadMap }) }))
+}
+
+/**
+ * The reported content, resolved.
+ *
+ * **Every miss returns `null`, never `undefined`.** They look interchangeable in
+ * JavaScript and are not in JSON: `undefined` is dropped by `JSON.stringify`, so
+ * a hard-deleted target would reach the client as an ABSENT `target` key rather
+ * than as an explicit null, and the queue's own contract says nullable. A client
+ * distinguishing "gone" from "not resolved yet" would get it wrong.
+ */
+function describeTarget(report, { threadMap, postMap, uploadMap }) {
+  const id = Number(report.target_id)
+  if (report.target_type === 'team_forum_thread') {
+    const t = threadMap.get(id)
+    if (!t) return null
+    return {
+      kind: 'thread',
+      threadId: t.id,
+      title: t.title,
+      type: t.type,
+      status: t.status,
+      author: t.created_username,
+    }
+  }
+  if (report.target_type === 'team_forum_post') {
+    const p = postMap.get(id)
+    if (!p) return null
+    return {
+      kind: 'post',
+      postId: p.id,
+      threadId: p.thread_id,
+      threadTitle: p.thread_title,
+      author: p.author_username,
+      status: p.status,
+      excerpt: excerpt(p.body_html),
+      createdAt: p.created_at,
+    }
+  }
+  if (report.target_type === 'team_forum_upload') {
+    const u = uploadMap.get(id)
+    if (!u) return null
+    // §5.6's fourth rule: uploader, size and the SNIFFED type, without hunting.
+    // This is the payoff for §5.5.4's attribution table being load-bearing rather
+    // than bookkeeping.
+    return {
+      kind: 'upload',
+      uploadId: u.id,
+      postId: u.post_id,
+      uploader: u.uploader_username,
+      filename: u.filename,
+      url: `/uploads/${u.filename}`,
+      mimetype: u.mimetype,
+      byteSize: u.byte_size,
+      createdAt: u.created_at,
+      deleted: u.deleted_at != null,
+    }
+  }
+  return null
+}
+
+function publicReport(row) {
+  return {
+    id: row.id,
+    targetType: row.target_type,
+    targetId: Number(row.target_id),
+    teamId: row.team_id,
+    reporter: row.reporter_username || '[deleted account]',
+    reporterDeleted: row.reporter_user_id == null,
+    reason: row.reason,
+    detail: row.detail,
+    status: row.status,
+    handledBy: row.handled_username,
+    handledNote: row.handled_note,
+    handledAt: row.handled_at,
+    createdAt: row.created_at,
+  }
+}
+
+/** Move a report along the queue. Staff-only by its route. */
+async function handle({ id, actor, status, note }) {
+  if (!STATUSES.includes(status)) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'Unknown report status' }
+  }
+  const report = await reportsDb.byId(id)
+  if (!report) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'Report not found' }
+
+  await reportsDb.handle(id, {
+    status,
+    handledBy: actor.id,
+    handledUsername: actor.username,
+    note,
+  })
+  return { ok: true, report: publicReport(await reportsDb.byId(id)) }
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  TARGET_TYPES,
+  REASONS,
+  STATUSES,
+  EXCERPT_CHARS,
+  file,
+  queue,
+  handle,
+  openCount: reportsDb.openCount,
+  publicReport,
+  targetTeamId,
+}

server/src/model/settings/settings.db.js

@@ -17,6 +17,20 @@ async function set(key, value, updatedBy = null) {
   )
 }
 
+// One row WITH its provenance. `updated_by`/`updated_at` are already stored for
+// every key; this is the only reader that needs them, because TEAMS.md §5.5.5
+// makes the uploads acknowledgement a RECORDED consent rather than a displayed
+// one, and "which admin accepted it, and when" is the question that has to be
+// answerable afterwards.
+async function getRow(key) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    'SELECT s.`key`, s.value, s.updated_by, s.updated_at, u.username AS updated_by_username '
+      + 'FROM settings s LEFT JOIN users u ON u.id = s.updated_by WHERE s.`key` = ? LIMIT 1',
+    [key],
+  )
+  return rows[0] || null
+}
+
 // Insert a default only if the key does not already exist.
 async function seedDefault(key, value) {
   await query('INSERT IGNORE INTO settings (`key`, value) VALUES (?, ?)', [key, value])
@@ -30,4 +44,4 @@ async function remove(key) {
   await query('DELETE FROM settings WHERE `key` = ?', [key])
 }
 
-module.exports = { getAll, get, set, seedDefault, remove }
+module.exports = { getAll, get, getRow, set, seedDefault, remove }

server/src/model/settings/settings.model.js

@@ -16,6 +16,18 @@ const PUBLIC_KEYS = [
   'theme_visual', // preset/custom colors, fonts, radii (JSON). See THEMING_AND_NAV.md §6.1.
   'brand_assets', // uploaded logo/hero/favicon overrides (JSON). §6.3.
   'nav_public', // public site nav overrides (JSON). §6.4.
+  // The two Team-forum controls (TEAMS.md §5.5.6). The client needs the first to
+  // know whether to render the forum panel at all, and the second to decide which
+  // composer to show — an upload control that 404s is worse than no control.
+  // Neither is sensitive.
+  //
+  // `teams_forum_uploads_ack` is deliberately NOT here: who accepted a liability
+  // notice is operator detail, exactly as `failure_reason` is in MODULE_API.md
+  // §2.9. And publishing the mode does not move the DECISION client-side — the
+  // server still resolves what renders (§5.5.3); the client is only told which
+  // composer to draw.
+  'teams_forums_enabled',
+  'teams_forum_images',
 ]
 
 // Admin-configurable theming & navigation (docs/website/THEMING_AND_NAV.md).

server/src/model/teams/teamAccess.db.js

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+// SQL for the two tables the access resolver reads: forum grants (path 3) and
+// staff leadership overrides (§2.5.1).
+//
+// Kept separate from teams.db.js on purpose. The four authority paths are four
+// tables answering four questions, and the single most important structural rule
+// in TEAMS.md is that no resolver reads another path's table — a file boundary is
+// a cheap way to make crossing one visible in a diff.
+
+const { query } = require('../../utils/db')
+
+// ── team_forum_grants (path 3) ─────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+const GRANT_COLUMNS = `
+  id, team_id, user_id, username, granted_by, granted_username, granted_at, reason,
+  revoked_by, revoked_username, revoked_at, revoke_reason`
+
+/** The caller's ACTIVE grant on a team, or undefined. At most one, by the unique key. */
+async function activeGrant(teamId, userId) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT ${GRANT_COLUMNS} FROM team_forum_grants
+     WHERE team_id = ? AND user_id = ? AND revoked_at IS NULL`,
+    [teamId, userId],
+  )
+  return rows[0]
+}
+
+/** The whole ledger for a team, revoked rows included — the admin grant view. */
+async function grantLedger(teamId) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT ${GRANT_COLUMNS} FROM team_forum_grants WHERE team_id = ? ORDER BY granted_at DESC, id DESC`,
+    [teamId],
+  )
+}
+
+/** Active grants only, for the "Forum guests" list and the per-team cap. */
+async function activeGrants(teamId) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT ${GRANT_COLUMNS} FROM team_forum_grants WHERE team_id = ? AND revoked_at IS NULL
+     ORDER BY granted_at`,
+    [teamId],
+  )
+}
+
+/** How many active grants a team currently holds — the §2.5 per-Team cap reads this. */
+async function activeGrantCount(teamId) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    'SELECT COUNT(*) AS n FROM team_forum_grants WHERE team_id = ? AND revoked_at IS NULL',
+    [teamId],
+  )
+  return Number(rows[0]?.n || 0)
+}
+
+/**
+ * Issue a grant.
+ *
+ * Writes nothing but this table — that is the non-contamination invariant, and it
+ * is a property of this function being the ONLY writer on the grant path rather
+ * than of anyone remembering it at the call site. The username snapshots are
+ * taken here so the ledger still reads after either account is deleted (§2.10).
+ */
+async function insertGrant({ teamId, userId, username, grantedBy, grantedUsername, reason }) {
+  const res = await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_forum_grants (team_id, user_id, username, granted_by, granted_username, reason)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+    [teamId, userId, username, grantedBy, grantedUsername, reason ?? null],
+  )
+  return res.insertId
+}
+
+/**
+ * Revoke the active grant, if there is one.
+ *
+ * An UPDATE of the existing row rather than a delete: the table is a ledger as
+ * well as the current state, and `revoked_at` is what moves a row out of the
+ * unique key (the generated `active_marker` goes NULL) while keeping the history.
+ */
+async function revokeGrant({ teamId, userId, revokedBy, revokedUsername, reason }) {
+  const res = await query(
+    `UPDATE team_forum_grants
+        SET revoked_at = NOW(), revoked_by = ?, revoked_username = ?, revoke_reason = ?
+      WHERE team_id = ? AND user_id = ? AND revoked_at IS NULL`,
+    [revokedBy, revokedUsername, reason ?? null, teamId, userId],
+  )
+  return res.affectedRows > 0
+}
+
+// ── team_leader_overrides (§2.5.1) ─────────────────────────────────────────
+
+const OVERRIDE_COLUMNS = 'team_id, member_key, effect, actor_user_id, actor_username, reason, created_at'
+
+async function overridesForTeam(teamId) {
+  return query(`SELECT ${OVERRIDE_COLUMNS} FROM team_leader_overrides WHERE team_id = ? ORDER BY member_key`,
+    [teamId])
+}
+
+async function overrideFor(teamId, memberKey) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT ${OVERRIDE_COLUMNS} FROM team_leader_overrides WHERE team_id = ? AND member_key = ?`,
+    [teamId, memberKey],
+  )
+  return rows[0]
+}
+
+/**
+ * Set or replace one override.
+ *
+ * The projection is never touched by this — `team_members.is_leader` keeps saying
+ * what the game says and this keeps saying what staff decided, which is the entire
+ * point (§2.5.1). An override applied INTO the projection would be clobbered by
+ * the next sync, fifteen minutes later.
+ */
+async function setOverride({ teamId, memberKey, effect, actorUserId, actorUsername, reason }) {
+  await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_leader_overrides (team_id, member_key, effect, actor_user_id, actor_username, reason)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
+     ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
+       effect = VALUES(effect), actor_user_id = VALUES(actor_user_id),
+       actor_username = VALUES(actor_username), reason = VALUES(reason), created_at = NOW()`,
+    [teamId, memberKey, effect, actorUserId, actorUsername, reason],
+  )
+}
+
+async function clearOverride(teamId, memberKey) {
+  const res = await query('DELETE FROM team_leader_overrides WHERE team_id = ? AND member_key = ?',
+    [teamId, memberKey])
+  return res.affectedRows > 0
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  activeGrant,
+  grantLedger,
+  activeGrants,
+  activeGrantCount,
+  insertGrant,
+  revokeGrant,
+  overridesForTeam,
+  overrideFor,
+  setOverride,
+  clearOverride,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamAccess.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+// ── The four authority paths ───────────────────────────────────────────────
+//
+// The single most important structural rule in TEAMS.md (§2.5): these are four
+// tables answering four questions, and **no resolver reads another path's table.**
+//
+//   1. Is this account a member?          module      team_members
+//   2. Does this account lead the Team?   module      team_members.is_leader,
+//                                                     plus a staff override
+//   3. May it use the Team forum?         CORE        team_forum_grants OR path 1
+//   4. May it get external-platform       CORE,       nothing of its own
+//      access?                            derived
+//
+// The temptation this file exists to resist is collapsing 1 and 3 into one
+// boolean. They answer different questions about different populations: a forum
+// grant may name any Runic Gateway account, including one with no game identity
+// at all — that is the point of it, since letting an unlinked guildmate into the
+// forum must not require a staff ticket. Treating "has forum access" as "is a
+// member" would put that person on the roster, in the member count, and into the
+// external-platform grant, which is where it stops being a modelling preference
+// and becomes an impersonation risk (path 4 below).
+//
+// Non-contamination is the invariant: a manual grant never writes the membership
+// projection, in either direction, ever. Both facts coexist and neither migrates
+// into the other.
+
+const accessDb = require('./teamAccess.db')
+const teamsDb = require('./teams.db')
+const identities = require('../userIdentities/userIdentities.model')
+
+/**
+ * Path 3 — forum access. Two reads, OR'd, and nothing else.
+ *
+ * `viaGrant` is reported even when membership also holds, deliberately: both
+ * facts are true, the UI presents membership as the current reason, and the grant
+ * survives as audit history. Collapsing them into one boolean is what loses the
+ * record of who let this person in and why.
+ */
+async function forumAccess(teamId, userId) {
+  if (!userId) return { allowed: false, viaMembership: false, viaGrant: false, isLeader: false }
+
+  const [grant, member] = await Promise.all([
+    accessDb.activeGrant(teamId, userId),   // path 3's own table
+    teamsDb.activeByUser(teamId, userId),   // path 1
+  ])
+
+  return {
+    allowed: Boolean(grant) || Boolean(member),
+    viaMembership: Boolean(member),
+    viaGrant: Boolean(grant),
+    isLeader: member ? await isLeader(teamId, member) : false,
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Path 2 — leadership, with the staff override applied ON TOP of the synced value
+ * at read time (§2.5.1).
+ *
+ * Applied at read rather than written into the projection because the sync owns
+ * that column and rewrites it every interval. An override that lived in
+ * `team_members` would be undone fifteen minutes after staff set it, which is the
+ * whole reason this is a separate table read here.
+ */
+async function isLeader(teamId, member) {
+  if (!member) return false
+  const override = await accessDb.overrideFor(teamId, member.member_key)
+  if (override) return override.effect === 'grant'
+  return Boolean(member.is_leader)
+}
+
+/** Leadership for a caller identified by user id rather than by a member row. */
+async function isLeaderByUser(teamId, userId) {
+  if (!userId) return false
+  const member = await teamsDb.activeByUser(teamId, userId)
+  return isLeader(teamId, member)
+}
+
+/**
+ * Path 4 — external-platform eligibility. Computed, no table of its own, and
+ * deliberately blind to path 3.
+ *
+ * The reason, stated so nobody "fixes" it later: an integration cannot verify
+ * that an unlinked, forum-granted account corresponds to a real game member, so
+ * it must not hand that account a privilege on a platform where impersonation has
+ * consequences. A forum is a room on the operator's own site with a known
+ * moderator; a Discord role is an identity claim in someone else's space.
+ */
+async function externalEligible(teamId, userId, platform) {
+  if (!userId || !platform) return false
+  const member = await teamsDb.activeByUser(teamId, userId)  // path 1 ONLY
+  if (!member || member.user_id == null) return false        // must be a LINKED game member
+  const linked = await identities.listForUser(userId)
+  return linked.some((i) => i.provider === platform)
+}
+
+/**
+ * A team's roster with overrides folded in, for the admin view and the Team page.
+ *
+ * The rows returned carry `is_leader` as RESOLVED — synced value plus override —
+ * and `is_leader_synced` as what the game actually said, so the admin surface can
+ * show that a decision was made rather than silently presenting it as fact.
+ */
+async function rosterWithOverrides(teamId, { includeDeparted = false } = {}) {
+  const [members, overrides] = await Promise.all([
+    teamsDb.membersByTeam(teamId, { includeDeparted }),
+    accessDb.overridesForTeam(teamId),
+  ])
+  const byKey = new Map(overrides.map((o) => [o.member_key, o]))
+  return members.map((m) => {
+    const override = byKey.get(m.member_key)
+    return {
+      ...m,
+      is_leader_synced: Boolean(m.is_leader),
+      is_leader: override ? override.effect === 'grant' : Boolean(m.is_leader),
+      leader_override: override
+        ? { effect: override.effect, reason: override.reason, by: override.actor_username, at: override.created_at }
+        : null,
+    }
+  })
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  forumAccess,
+  isLeader,
+  isLeaderByUser,
+  externalEligible,
+  rosterWithOverrides,
+  setLeaderOverride: accessDb.setOverride,
+  clearLeaderOverride: accessDb.clearOverride,
+  grantLedger: accessDb.grantLedger,
+  activeGrants: accessDb.activeGrants,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamActivity.db.js

@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+// SQL for the per-Team activity feed (TEAMS.md §4.2). Statements only; every
+// decision about what a caller may SEE lives in teamActivity.model.js.
+
+const { query } = require('../../utils/db')
+
+const ACTIVITY_COLUMNS = `
+  id, team_id, source, kind, summary, visibility,
+  actor_member_key, actor_user_id, payload, occurred_at, created_at`
+
+/**
+ * Insert one item, idempotently when it carries a dedupe key.
+ *
+ * INSERT IGNORE against uq_team_activity_dedupe is what makes replay safe: a
+ * sidecar reconnect backfills a window of events it already delivered, and
+ * without this every reconnect would double-post the feed. The same trick
+ * `shard_events` uses, for the same reason.
+ *
+ * The unique key is (team_id, dedupe_key) and MariaDB treats NULL as distinct in
+ * a unique index, so items WITHOUT a key never collide with each other — an
+ * un-keyed push is always an insert, which is the documented contract (§4.1:
+ * `dedupeKey` is optional and "makes replay idempotent", so omitting it opts out).
+ *
+ * IGNORE would also swallow a genuine error — a bad FK, an over-long summary. The
+ * model validates and truncates before calling, so what reaches here can only fail
+ * on the dedupe key, and `affectedRows` reports which happened.
+ */
+async function insert(item) {
+  const res = await query(
+    `INSERT IGNORE INTO team_activity
+       (team_id, source, kind, summary, visibility, actor_member_key, actor_user_id, payload, occurred_at, dedupe_key)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+    [
+      item.teamId,
+      item.source,
+      item.kind,
+      item.summary,
+      item.visibility,
+      item.actorMemberKey,
+      item.actorUserId,
+      item.payload === null ? null : JSON.stringify(item.payload),
+      new Date(item.occurredAt),
+      item.dedupeKey,
+    ],
+  )
+  return Number(res.affectedRows) > 0
+}
+
+/**
+ * One page of a Team's feed, already narrowed to the visibilities the caller may
+ * see.
+ *
+ * `visibilities` is always supplied by the model and never by a request
+ * parameter — a caller naming its own visibility filter is the whole bug this
+ * table's ENUM exists to prevent. Ordered newest first by `occurred_at`, the
+ * game's clock, not `created_at`: a backfill that arrives late still sorts where
+ * it happened.
+ */
+async function page(teamId, visibilities, { limit, offset }) {
+  const slots = visibilities.map(() => '?').join(', ')
+  return query(
+    `SELECT ${ACTIVITY_COLUMNS} FROM team_activity
+      WHERE team_id = ? AND visibility IN (${slots})
+      ORDER BY occurred_at DESC, id DESC
+      LIMIT ? OFFSET ?`,
+    [teamId, ...visibilities, limit, offset],
+  )
+}
+
+/** Total matching rows, for the same filter — so a client can page honestly. */
+async function count(teamId, visibilities) {
+  const slots = visibilities.map(() => '?').join(', ')
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT COUNT(*) AS n FROM team_activity WHERE team_id = ? AND visibility IN (${slots})`,
+    [teamId, ...visibilities],
+  )
+  return Number(rows[0] ? rows[0].n : 0)
+}
+
+/** Everything older than the retention horizon, across every Team. */
+async function deleteOlderThan(days) {
+  const res = await query(
+    'DELETE FROM team_activity WHERE occurred_at < (NOW() - INTERVAL ? DAY)',
+    [days],
+  )
+  return Number(res.affectedRows) || 0
+}
+
+/**
+ * Which Teams currently exceed the per-Team row cap, and by how much.
+ *
+ * Asked first so the trim only runs for Teams that need it. A feed fed by a game
+ * loop is the obvious unbounded-growth failure (§4.2), and on a shard with one
+ * busy guild and fifty quiet ones this keeps the nightly job proportional to the
+ * problem rather than to the number of Teams.
+ */
+async function overCap(cap) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT team_id, COUNT(*) AS n FROM team_activity
+      GROUP BY team_id HAVING n > ?`,
+    [cap],
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * Trim one Team back to the newest `cap` rows.
+ *
+ * Expressed as "delete everything at or below the id of the cap-th newest row"
+ * rather than as a correlated subquery on the same table, which MariaDB refuses
+ * inside a DELETE (error 1093). The derived table is what makes it legal — the
+ * subquery is materialised before the delete runs.
+ */
+async function trimToCap(teamId, cap) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT id FROM team_activity
+      WHERE team_id = ? ORDER BY occurred_at DESC, id DESC LIMIT 1 OFFSET ?`,
+    [teamId, cap],
+  )
+  if (!rows[0]) return 0
+  const res = await query(
+    'DELETE FROM team_activity WHERE team_id = ? AND id <= ?',
+    [teamId, rows[0].id],
+  )
+  return Number(res.affectedRows) || 0
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  insert,
+  page,
+  count,
+  deleteOlderThan,
+  overCap,
+  trimToCap,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamActivity.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,312 @@
+// ── The per-Team activity feed (TEAMS.md Part 4) ───────────────────────────
+//
+// Two writers, one table. A module pushes game items through
+// `ctx.teams.activity.push` (§4.1); core writes its own membership and rename
+// items directly (§4.2). Both land in `team_activity` with a `source`, and the
+// read path treats them identically — which is the point of core writing here at
+// all, since it means the rendering path is exercised from day one on a
+// deployment whose module pushes nothing.
+//
+// **Three rules shape this file.**
+//
+// 1. *Core never composes a summary.* `summary` arrives already rendered and is
+//    stored verbatim (§4.1). Core cannot phrase "gained 15,000 gold" for a game
+//    whose vocabulary it does not know, and a core that templated it would have
+//    re-acquired the game semantics the module system exists to remove. Core's OWN
+//    five kinds are the sole exception, and they are about membership and renames
+//    — platform facts, not game ones.
+//
+// 2. *Visibility fails closed.* An item with no stated visibility is `members`,
+//    and the read path resolves what a caller may see from their access rather
+//    than from anything they send.
+//
+// 3. *A push never throws at its call site.* `ctx.teams.activity.push` is awaited
+//    by a module inside a game-event handler. A bad item is dropped and logged;
+//    an unknown Team is dropped and logged. The alternative — rejecting the batch
+//    — makes core's storage problem into the module's control flow, and the
+//    contract (MODULE_API.md §2.3) is that ctx pushes are fire-and-forget.
+
+const activityDb = require('./teamActivity.db')
+const teamsDb = require('./teams.db')
+const access = require('./teamAccess.model')
+const settings = require('../settings/settings.model')
+
+const log = require('../../utils/logger')('teams')
+
+// Column widths from schema.sql. Truncating rather than refusing: an over-long
+// summary is a module being verbose, not a module being wrong, and dropping the
+// item would lose a real event over a display detail.
+const MAX_SUMMARY = 255
+const MAX_KIND = 64
+const MAX_MEMBER_KEY = 191
+// CHAR(40) — a sha1 hex is the natural fit and what §4.1's example looks like,
+// but the column is opaque and any stable string within the width works.
+const MAX_DEDUPE = 40
+
+const VISIBILITIES = ['public', 'members']
+
+// Retention (§4.2). Both are settings so an operator can tighten a busy shard
+// without a deploy; the defaults are the doc's.
+const DEFAULT_RETAIN_DAYS = 90
+const DEFAULT_ROW_CAP = 2000
+
+/**
+ * Core's own kinds (§4.2).
+ *
+ * `core.forum.thread` is named in the doc and lands with the forum in phase 4 —
+ * there is nothing to emit it from yet. The four here are all core knows how to
+ * say without asking a game anything.
+ */
+const CORE_KINDS = {
+  MEMBER_JOINED: 'core.member.joined',
+  MEMBER_LEFT: 'core.member.left',
+  LEADER_CHANGED: 'core.leader.changed',
+  TEAM_RENAMED: 'core.team.renamed',
+}
+
+const clamp = (v, max) => (typeof v === 'string' && v.trim() ? v.trim().slice(0, max) : null)
+
+/**
+ * Normalise one pushed item, or return null to drop it.
+ *
+ * `teamId` is resolved by the caller, not carried on the item: a module names its
+ * own `externalId` and core maps it (§4.1), so a module can never write into
+ * another module's Team by guessing an integer.
+ */
+function normalise(item, source, teamId) {
+  if (!item || typeof item !== 'object') return null
+
+  const kind = clamp(item.kind, MAX_KIND)
+  const summary = clamp(item.summary, MAX_SUMMARY)
+  // Both are load-bearing and neither has a safe default: an item with no kind
+  // cannot be filtered or rendered by a slot, and one with no summary is a blank
+  // row on a public page.
+  if (!kind || !summary) return null
+
+  // `occurredAt` is the game's clock and the feed's sort key. A missing or
+  // unparseable one becomes now — the item is real even when its timestamp is
+  // not, and dropping it would lose an event over metadata.
+  const occurredAt = Number.isFinite(item.occurredAt) ? Number(item.occurredAt) : Date.now()
+
+  return {
+    teamId,
+    source,
+    kind,
+    summary,
+    visibility: VISIBILITIES.includes(item.visibility) ? item.visibility : 'members',
+    actorMemberKey: clamp(item.actorMemberKey, MAX_MEMBER_KEY),
+    // Resolved BY THE MODULE, like every other user id crossing this boundary
+    // (§2.3) — core takes the number and never looks it up.
+    actorUserId: Number.isInteger(item.actorUserId) && item.actorUserId > 0 ? item.actorUserId : null,
+    payload: item.payload && typeof item.payload === 'object' ? item.payload : null,
+    occurredAt,
+    dedupeKey: clamp(item.dedupeKey, MAX_DEDUPE),
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * `ctx.teams.activity.push` — a module's whole write access to the feed.
+ *
+ * Items name their Team by the module's own `externalId`, and only ACTIVE Teams
+ * owned by THAT module resolve. An archived Team is deliberately not writable: its
+ * feed is a read-only record of what happened before the rename or the disband
+ * (§2.2), and letting a late-arriving event append to it would make a closed
+ * record grow.
+ *
+ * Returns the number of items actually stored. Dropped items are logged with the
+ * reason and never raised — see rule 3 above.
+ */
+async function push(source, items) {
+  if (!Array.isArray(items)) {
+    log.warn('teams activity push: not an array', { source })
+    return 0
+  }
+  if (!items.length) return 0
+
+  // One lookup per distinct externalId, not one per item: a champion spawn
+  // completing pushes a batch for a single Team, and re-resolving it per item
+  // would be a query per row.
+  const teamIds = new Map()
+  let stored = 0
+  let dropped = 0
+
+  for (const item of items) {
+    const externalId = item && typeof item.externalId === 'string' ? item.externalId.trim() : ''
+    if (!externalId) { dropped += 1; continue }
+
+    if (!teamIds.has(externalId)) {
+      // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+      const row = await teamsDb.findActive(source, externalId)
+      teamIds.set(externalId, row ? row.id : null)
+    }
+    const teamId = teamIds.get(externalId)
+    if (!teamId) { dropped += 1; continue }
+
+    const normalised = normalise(item, source, teamId)
+    if (!normalised) { dropped += 1; continue }
+
+    // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+    const inserted = await activityDb.insert(normalised)
+    // A dedupe collision is a SUCCESSFUL no-op, not a drop — it is the mechanism
+    // working. Counted as stored so a module replaying a backfill does not read
+    // its own idempotence as data loss.
+    if (inserted) stored += 1
+  }
+
+  if (dropped) {
+    log.warn('teams activity push: dropped items', { source, dropped, offered: items.length })
+  }
+  return stored
+}
+
+/**
+ * Core's own write path (§4.2), used by the reconciler and the rename rule.
+ *
+ * Separate from `push` because core names a Team by its own primary key — it is
+ * already holding the row — and because core's items are always `public`: a
+ * member joining or a Team being renamed is exactly what a public Team page is
+ * for. Nothing here is game vocabulary.
+ */
+async function logCore({ teamId, kind, summary, actorMemberKey = null, actorUserId = null, occurredAt = Date.now(), dedupeKey = null }) {
+  if (!teamId || !kind || !summary) return false
+  return activityDb.insert({
+    teamId,
+    source: 'core',
+    kind: clamp(kind, MAX_KIND),
+    summary: clamp(summary, MAX_SUMMARY),
+    visibility: 'public',
+    actorMemberKey: clamp(actorMemberKey, MAX_MEMBER_KEY),
+    actorUserId: Number.isInteger(actorUserId) && actorUserId > 0 ? actorUserId : null,
+    payload: null,
+    occurredAt,
+    dedupeKey: clamp(dedupeKey, MAX_DEDUPE),
+  })
+}
+
+/**
+ * Which visibilities a caller may see (§4.3).
+ *
+ * `members` items go to members and to forum-granted users — the same two
+ * authority paths `forumAccess` already resolves, reused rather than re-derived
+ * so the feed can never disagree with the forum about who is inside a Team.
+ * Anyone else, including every anonymous caller, sees `public` only.
+ */
+async function visibilitiesFor(teamId, userId) {
+  if (!userId) return ['public']
+  const resolved = await access.forumAccess(teamId, userId)
+  return resolved.allowed ? ['public', 'members'] : ['public']
+}
+
+/** The rendered shape. `payload` rides along for the module's slot (§4.3). */
+function publicItem(row) {
+  return {
+    id: Number(row.id),
+    source: row.source,
+    kind: row.kind,
+    summary: row.summary,
+    visibility: row.visibility,
+    occurredAt: row.occurred_at,
+    payload: row.payload ?? null,
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * One page of a Team's feed for one viewer.
+ *
+ * A HIDDEN Team's feed is not served publicly, for the same reason its roster is
+ * not (§2.8.3): hidden means absent from every public surface, and a feed that
+ * answered while the page 404s would republish the suppressed name in every
+ * `core.team.renamed` summary.
+ */
+async function feedFor(slug, userId, { limit = 50, offset = 0 } = {}) {
+  const row = await teamsDb.findBySlug(slug)
+  if (!row) return null
+
+  const visibilities = await visibilitiesFor(row.id, userId)
+  // A member of a hidden Team still sees its feed — suppression is a
+  // public-surface rule, and a member is not a member of the public (§2.11).
+  if (row.hidden && visibilities.length === 1) return null
+
+  const [rows, total] = await Promise.all([
+    activityDb.page(row.id, visibilities, { limit, offset }),
+    activityDb.count(row.id, visibilities),
+  ])
+  return {
+    items: rows.map(publicItem),
+    total,
+    limit,
+    offset,
+    // So a client can render "members-only items are hidden" rather than
+    // presenting a filtered feed as the whole one.
+    scope: visibilities.includes('members') ? 'members' : 'public',
+  }
+}
+
+// ── Retention (§4.2) ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+const RETAIN_KEY = 'team_activity_retain_days'
+const CAP_KEY = 'team_activity_row_cap'
+
+/**
+ * Read both limits, falling back to the defaults on anything unreadable.
+ *
+ * Wrapped in a try like `teamSync.intervalSeconds`, and for the same reason: this
+ * runs on a timer with nobody watching, and a settings table that is briefly
+ * unavailable must yield the default rather than an exception that kills the
+ * nightly job. A misconfigured value fails the same way — a zero or a negative
+ * retention would delete the whole feed, so it is rejected rather than honoured.
+ */
+async function retentionConfig() {
+  let rawDays
+  let rawCap
+  try {
+    ;[rawDays, rawCap] = await Promise.all([settings.get(RETAIN_KEY), settings.get(CAP_KEY)])
+  } catch {
+    return { days: DEFAULT_RETAIN_DAYS, cap: DEFAULT_ROW_CAP }
+  }
+  const days = Number.parseInt(rawDays, 10)
+  const cap = Number.parseInt(rawCap, 10)
+  return {
+    days: Number.isFinite(days) && days > 0 ? days : DEFAULT_RETAIN_DAYS,
+    cap: Number.isFinite(cap) && cap > 0 ? cap : DEFAULT_ROW_CAP,
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The nightly prune: an age horizon AND a per-Team row cap.
+ *
+ * Both, because either alone has a hole. Age alone lets one busy guild write a
+ * million rows inside the window; a cap alone keeps a dead Team's feed forever.
+ * Unbounded growth on a per-Team feed fed by a game loop is the obvious failure
+ * here and it is cheaper to bound it now than to discover it at cutover.
+ */
+async function prune() {
+  const { days, cap } = await retentionConfig()
+  const byAge = await activityDb.deleteOlderThan(days)
+
+  let byCap = 0
+  const over = await activityDb.overCap(cap)
+  for (const row of over) {
+    // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+    byCap += await activityDb.trimToCap(row.team_id, cap)
+  }
+
+  if (byAge || byCap) log.info('teams activity prune', { byAge, byCap, days, cap })
+  return { byAge, byCap, days, cap }
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  push,
+  logCore,
+  feedFor,
+  visibilitiesFor,
+  publicItem,
+  prune,
+  retentionConfig,
+  RETAIN_KEY,
+  CAP_KEY,
+  CORE_KINDS,
+  VISIBILITIES,
+  DEFAULT_RETAIN_DAYS,
+  DEFAULT_ROW_CAP,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamForum.db.js

@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
+// SQL for the four forum tables (TEAMS.md §5.2, §5.2a).
+//
+// Kept apart from teamAccess.db.js for the same reason that file is kept apart
+// from teams.db.js: forum CONTENT and forum ACCESS are different questions, and a
+// query here that read `team_members` to decide who may see a thread would be the
+// exact collapse §2.5 forbids. Nothing in this file resolves access; callers hand
+// it a decision the resolver already made.
+
+const { query } = require('../../utils/db')
+
+const THREAD_COLUMNS = `
+  id, team_id, type, title, created_by, created_username, created_at,
+  last_post_at, post_count, pinned, locked, status`
+
+const POST_COLUMNS = `
+  id, thread_id, author_user_id, author_username, body_html, created_at,
+  edited_at, edited_by, status`
+
+// ── threads ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * A Team's threads, newest activity first with pinned rows on top.
+ *
+ * `includeHidden` is the staff/leader view. Hidden is not deleted: a hidden
+ * thread stays in the ledger and comes back with `unhide`, which is why the
+ * status filter is a parameter rather than a WHERE clause everyone remembers.
+ */
+async function threadsByTeam(teamId, { includeHidden = false, limit = 50, offset = 0 } = {}) {
+  const statuses = includeHidden ? "('visible','hidden')" : "('visible')"
+  return query(
+    `SELECT ${THREAD_COLUMNS} FROM team_forum_threads
+      WHERE team_id = ? AND status IN ${statuses}
+      ORDER BY pinned DESC, COALESCE(last_post_at, created_at) DESC, id DESC
+      LIMIT ? OFFSET ?`,
+    [teamId, limit, offset],
+  )
+}
+
+async function threadById(id) {
+  const rows = await query(`SELECT ${THREAD_COLUMNS} FROM team_forum_threads WHERE id = ? LIMIT 1`, [id])
+  return rows[0] || null
+}
+
+async function insertThread({ teamId, type, title, createdBy, createdUsername }) {
+  const res = await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_forum_threads (team_id, type, title, created_by, created_username, last_post_at, post_count)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, NOW(), 0)`,
+    [teamId, type, title, createdBy, createdUsername],
+  )
+  return res.insertId
+}
+
+/** Apply one moderation action's effect. The LEDGER row is written separately. */
+async function setThreadFlags(id, { pinned, locked, status }) {
+  const sets = []
+  const args = []
+  if (pinned !== undefined) { sets.push('pinned = ?'); args.push(pinned ? 1 : 0) }
+  if (locked !== undefined) { sets.push('locked = ?'); args.push(locked ? 1 : 0) }
+  if (status !== undefined) { sets.push('status = ?'); args.push(status) }
+  if (!sets.length) return false
+  args.push(id)
+  const res = await query(`UPDATE team_forum_threads SET ${sets.join(', ')} WHERE id = ?`, args)
+  return res.affectedRows > 0
+}
+
+// ── posts ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+async function postsByThread(threadId, { includeHidden = false } = {}) {
+  const statuses = includeHidden ? "('visible','hidden')" : "('visible')"
+  return query(
+    `SELECT ${POST_COLUMNS} FROM team_forum_posts
+      WHERE thread_id = ? AND status IN ${statuses} ORDER BY created_at, id`,
+    [threadId],
+  )
+}
+
+async function postById(id) {
+  const rows = await query(`SELECT ${POST_COLUMNS} FROM team_forum_posts WHERE id = ? LIMIT 1`, [id])
+  return rows[0] || null
+}
+
+/**
+ * Append a post and move the thread's counters in the same breath.
+ *
+ * Two statements rather than a trigger: the counters are a denormalisation for
+ * the thread list, and a trigger would put half the write in the schema where
+ * nobody reading this file would find it.
+ */
+async function insertPost({ threadId, authorUserId, authorUsername, bodyHtml }) {
+  const res = await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_forum_posts (thread_id, author_user_id, author_username, body_html)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+    [threadId, authorUserId, authorUsername, bodyHtml],
+  )
+  await query(
+    'UPDATE team_forum_threads SET post_count = post_count + 1, last_post_at = NOW() WHERE id = ?',
+    [threadId],
+  )
+  return res.insertId
+}
+
+async function setPostStatus(id, status) {
+  const res = await query('UPDATE team_forum_posts SET status = ? WHERE id = ?', [status, id])
+  return res.affectedRows > 0
+}
+
+/**
+ * Rewrite a post's body, stamping who edited it and when.
+ *
+ * `edited_at` is set unconditionally, including when a staffer edits — the column
+ * answers "has this been changed since it was written", which a reader needs to
+ * know regardless of whose hand did it. `edited_by` is the second half of that
+ * answer and is why the two are separate columns rather than a boolean.
+ */
+async function updatePostBody(id, bodyHtml, editedBy) {
+  const res = await query(
+    'UPDATE team_forum_posts SET body_html = ?, edited_at = NOW(), edited_by = ? WHERE id = ?',
+    [bodyHtml, editedBy, id],
+  )
+  return res.affectedRows > 0
+}
+
+/**
+ * Recompute a thread's denormalised counters from the posts that are actually
+ * visible.
+ *
+ * Called after every post moderation rather than incrementing and decrementing,
+ * because hide → unhide → delete → restore is a sequence in which a counter kept
+ * by deltas drifts the first time any step is retried or raced. The read is one
+ * indexed aggregate over one thread; correctness is worth more than the write it
+ * saves. `last_post_at` falls back to NULL for an emptied thread, which is what
+ * `threadsByTeam`'s COALESCE onto `created_at` already expects.
+ */
+async function recountThread(threadId) {
+  await query(
+    `UPDATE team_forum_threads t
+        SET t.post_count = (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM team_forum_posts p
+                             WHERE p.thread_id = t.id AND p.status = 'visible'),
+            t.last_post_at = (SELECT MAX(p.created_at) FROM team_forum_posts p
+                               WHERE p.thread_id = t.id AND p.status = 'visible')
+      WHERE t.id = ?`,
+    [threadId],
+  )
+}
+
+// ── the moderation ledger (append-only) ────────────────────────────────────
+
+async function insertModeration({ teamId, targetType, targetId, action, actorUserId, actorUsername, actorRole, reason }) {
+  await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_forum_moderation
+       (team_id, target_type, target_id, action, actor_user_id, actor_username, actor_role, reason)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+    [teamId, targetType, targetId, action, actorUserId, actorUsername, actorRole, reason ?? null],
+  )
+}
+
+async function moderationForTeam(teamId, { limit = 100, offset = 0 } = {}) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT id, team_id, target_type, target_id, action, actor_user_id, actor_username,
+            actor_role, reason, created_at
+       FROM team_forum_moderation WHERE team_id = ?
+      ORDER BY created_at DESC, id DESC LIMIT ? OFFSET ?`,
+    [teamId, limit, offset],
+  )
+}
+
+// ── uploads (§5.2a) ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+const UPLOAD_COLUMNS = `
+  id, team_id, post_id, uploader_user_id, uploader_username, filename, mimetype,
+  byte_size, created_at, deleted_at, deleted_by`
+
+async function insertUpload({ teamId, postId, uploaderUserId, uploaderUsername, filename, mimetype, byteSize }) {
+  const res = await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_forum_uploads
+       (team_id, post_id, uploader_user_id, uploader_username, filename, mimetype, byte_size)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+    [teamId, postId ?? null, uploaderUserId, uploaderUsername, filename, mimetype, byteSize],
+  )
+  return res.insertId
+}
+
+async function uploadById(id) {
+  const rows = await query(`SELECT ${UPLOAD_COLUMNS} FROM team_forum_uploads WHERE id = ? LIMIT 1`, [id])
+  return rows[0] || null
+}
+
+/** Bytes this account has uploaded in the trailing window — the §5.5.4 daily quota. */
+async function bytesUploadedSince(userId, sinceHours) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT COALESCE(SUM(byte_size), 0) AS bytes FROM team_forum_uploads
+      WHERE uploader_user_id = ? AND created_at > (NOW() - INTERVAL ? HOUR)`,
+    [userId, sinceHours],
+  )
+  return Number(rows[0]?.bytes || 0)
+}
+
+/** The admin attribution view: who uploaded what, when, how much, and where. */
+async function listUploads({ limit = 100, offset = 0, includeDeleted = false } = {}) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT u.id, u.team_id, u.post_id, u.uploader_user_id, u.uploader_username,
+            u.filename, u.mimetype, u.byte_size, u.created_at, u.deleted_at, u.deleted_by,
+            t.name AS team_name, t.slug AS team_slug
+       FROM team_forum_uploads u JOIN teams t ON t.id = u.team_id
+      ${includeDeleted ? '' : 'WHERE u.deleted_at IS NULL'}
+      ORDER BY u.created_at DESC, u.id DESC LIMIT ? OFFSET ?`,
+    [limit, offset],
+  )
+}
+
+async function softDeleteUpload(id, deletedBy) {
+  const res = await query(
+    'UPDATE team_forum_uploads SET deleted_at = NOW(), deleted_by = ? WHERE id = ? AND deleted_at IS NULL',
+    [deletedBy, id],
+  )
+  return res.affectedRows > 0
+}
+
+/** Soft-delete every upload attached to a post — the lifecycle half of §5.5.4. */
+async function softDeleteUploadsForPost(postId, deletedBy) {
+  await query(
+    'UPDATE team_forum_uploads SET deleted_at = NOW(), deleted_by = ? WHERE post_id = ? AND deleted_at IS NULL',
+    [deletedBy, postId],
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * The other half of the pair: a restored post gets its images back.
+ *
+ * Without this, `delete` then `restore` returns the words and loses the pictures —
+ * and loses them SILENTLY, because the soft-deleted rows survive the retention
+ * window before the sweep takes the bytes, so the post looks fine until the night
+ * it does not. Beyond that window the row itself is gone and this is a no-op;
+ * nothing can be done about that and nothing should pretend otherwise.
+ */
+async function restoreUploadsForPost(postId) {
+  await query(
+    'UPDATE team_forum_uploads SET deleted_at = NULL, deleted_by = NULL WHERE post_id = ? AND deleted_at IS NOT NULL',
+    [postId],
+  )
+}
+
+/** Rows soft-deleted longer ago than the retention window — the sweep's worklist. */
+async function sweepableUploads(retentionDays) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT id, filename FROM team_forum_uploads
+      WHERE deleted_at IS NOT NULL AND deleted_at < (NOW() - INTERVAL ? DAY)`,
+    [retentionDays],
+  )
+}
+
+/** Never-referenced uploads older than the grace period — a composer opened and abandoned. */
+async function orphanedUploads(graceHours) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT id, filename FROM team_forum_uploads
+      WHERE post_id IS NULL AND deleted_at IS NULL AND created_at < (NOW() - INTERVAL ? HOUR)`,
+    [graceHours],
+  )
+}
+
+async function deleteUploadRows(ids) {
+  if (!ids.length) return 0
+  const res = await query(
+    `DELETE FROM team_forum_uploads WHERE id IN (${ids.map(() => '?').join(',')})`,
+    ids,
+  )
+  return res.affectedRows
+}
+
+
+module.exports = {
+  threadsByTeam,
+  threadById,
+  insertThread,
+  setThreadFlags,
+  postsByThread,
+  postById,
+  insertPost,
+  setPostStatus,
+  updatePostBody,
+  recountThread,
+  insertModeration,
+  moderationForTeam,
+  insertUpload,
+  uploadById,
+  bytesUploadedSince,
+  listUploads,
+  softDeleteUpload,
+  softDeleteUploadsForPost,
+  restoreUploadsForPost,
+  sweepableUploads,
+  orphanedUploads,
+  deleteUploadRows,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamForum.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,437 @@
+// ── The forum: access + announcements (5a), discussion + moderation (5b) ───
+//
+// TEAMS.md §5.1's split is BY LAYER, not by feature: 5a shipped the whole access
+// model and a single announcements stream per Team; 5b (phase 5) opens discussion
+// threads, replies, editing and post-level moderation. The schema for all of it
+// landed together, so this phase added no ALTER — every column it needed
+// (`type`, `locked`, `edited_at`, `edited_by`, the post table's `status`, the
+// ledger's `target_type='post'`) was already there waiting.
+//
+// **Every function here takes an already-resolved access decision.** Nothing in
+// this file reads `team_members` or `team_forum_grants`; the caller asks
+// teamAccess.forumAccess() once and hands the answer down. That is §5.4's "never
+// by checking membership directly, which is how paths 1 and 3 would drift back
+// together", made structural.
+//
+// **The read path is where the image policy is applied**, once, in `renderPost`.
+// Not in the controller and never in the client: the client is TOLD the mode so it
+// can draw the right composer, and is never the thing that decides whether an
+// image appears (§5.5.6).
+
+const forumDb = require('./teamForum.db')
+const forumSettings = require('./teamForumSettings.model')
+const { cleanForumBody, renderForumBody } = require('../../utils/forumHtml')
+
+// Announcements are leader-authored and take no replies; discussion threads are
+// member-authored and do. Both have been in the enum since 5a — what phase 5
+// changed is that both are now CREATABLE, and by different people.
+//
+// **The authority split lives in the controller, not here.** This list says what
+// kinds of thread exist; who may make one is a question about the caller, which
+// this file deliberately never asks (see the header on access decisions).
+const CREATABLE_TYPES = ['announcement', 'discussion']
+
+// Kept as an export because it names a real fact — the one type 5a could create —
+// and because removing a name from a module's surface to save a line is how a
+// consumer outside this repo breaks. It is not used to decide anything.
+const CREATABLE_TYPES_5A = ['announcement']
+
+// Which thread types accept replies. An announcement's `locked` stays false even
+// though nothing may reply to it: replies are refused because the TYPE takes none,
+// not because the thread was closed, and conflating the two would make "unlock"
+// look like it would open replies on an announcement.
+const REPLYABLE_TYPES = ['discussion']
+
+const DELETED_AUTHOR = '[deleted account]'
+
+/**
+ * Moderation actions, and what each one does to the row.
+ *
+ * A table rather than a switch because the ledger and the effect have to stay in
+ * step: every entry here writes one row of `team_forum_moderation` naming the
+ * authority that was exercised, and an action with an effect but no ledger entry
+ * would be a moderation nobody can audit.
+ */
+const THREAD_ACTIONS = {
+  pin: { pinned: true },
+  unpin: { pinned: false },
+  lock: { locked: true },
+  unlock: { locked: false },
+  hide: { status: 'hidden' },
+  unhide: { status: 'visible' },
+  delete: { status: 'deleted' },
+  restore: { status: 'visible' },
+}
+
+// Post-level moderation. A strict subset of THREAD_ACTIONS: `pin` and `lock`
+// describe a thread's place in a list and its openness to replies, neither of
+// which a post has. Naming them here as "not applicable" rather than as "unknown"
+// is what lets `moderatePost` tell a caller which mistake they made.
+const POST_ACTIONS = {
+  hide: { status: 'hidden' },
+  unhide: { status: 'visible' },
+  delete: { status: 'deleted' },
+  restore: { status: 'visible' },
+}
+
+function publicThread(row) {
+  return {
+    id: row.id,
+    type: row.type,
+    title: row.title,
+    author: row.created_username || DELETED_AUTHOR,
+    authorDeleted: row.created_by == null,
+    createdAt: row.created_at,
+    lastPostAt: row.last_post_at,
+    postCount: row.post_count,
+    pinned: Boolean(row.pinned),
+    locked: Boolean(row.locked),
+    status: row.status,
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * May this viewer edit this post, and until when?
+ *
+ * **Computed on the server and handed to the client, never the other way round** —
+ * the same rule §5.5.3 applies to the image policy, for the same reason. A client
+ * that decided this would be deciding it against its own clock, and a clock is the
+ * one input a time-bounded permission must not take from the party it bounds.
+ *
+ * Staff get `editableUntil: null`, which reads as "no deadline" rather than as "no
+ * permission" — `canEdit` is the permission and this is only its expiry. An author
+ * past their window keeps a past `editableUntil`, so the UI can say *why* the
+ * control is gone instead of silently dropping it.
+ */
+function editability(row, { userId = null, isStaff = false, windowMinutes = 0, now = Date.now() } = {}) {
+  // A hidden or deleted post is not editable by anybody, staff included. Restoring
+  // it is a moderation action with a ledger row; quietly rewriting it while it is
+  // out of sight is the same act with no record.
+  if (row.status !== 'visible') return { canEdit: false, editableUntil: null }
+  if (isStaff) return { canEdit: true, editableUntil: null }
+  if (!userId || row.author_user_id == null || row.author_user_id !== userId) {
+    return { canEdit: false, editableUntil: null }
+  }
+  const until = new Date(row.created_at).getTime() + windowMinutes * 60_000
+  return { canEdit: until > now, editableUntil: new Date(until).toISOString() }
+}
+
+/**
+ * One post, rendered for one image policy and one viewer.
+ *
+ * `body` is what the reader gets and `mode` decides whether it carries images.
+ * The STORED html is never modified — flipping the policy changes this function's
+ * output and nothing on disk, which is the property §5.5.3 exists to give and the
+ * one acceptance criterion 3 measures.
+ *
+ * `viewer` is optional so that every 5a caller keeps working unchanged; omitting
+ * it yields `canEdit: false`, which is the right answer for a caller that has not
+ * said who is reading.
+ */
+function renderPost(row, mode, viewer) {
+  return {
+    id: row.id,
+    author: row.author_username || DELETED_AUTHOR,
+    authorDeleted: row.author_user_id == null,
+    body: renderForumBody(row.body_html, mode),
+    createdAt: row.created_at,
+    editedAt: row.edited_at,
+    status: row.status,
+    mine: Boolean(viewer?.userId) && row.author_user_id === viewer.userId,
+    ...editability(row, viewer),
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The thread list for one viewer.
+ *
+ * `canModerate` widens what is returned, not just what is offered: a hidden
+ * thread is visible to the people who can unhide it and to nobody else, so the
+ * same call answers both audiences without a second endpoint that could disagree
+ * with this one.
+ */
+async function listThreads(teamId, { canModerate = false, limit = 50, offset = 0 } = {}) {
+  const rows = await forumDb.threadsByTeam(teamId, { includeHidden: canModerate, limit, offset })
+  return rows.map(publicThread)
+}
+
+/**
+ * One thread with its posts, rendered under the current image policy and for one
+ * viewer.
+ *
+ * `viewer` carries who is reading and what the edit window is, so every post comes
+ * back already knowing whether this caller may edit it. The alternative — shipping
+ * the window to the client and letting it compare timestamps — is the thing
+ * `editability` exists not to do.
+ */
+async function getThread(teamId, threadId, { canModerate = false, viewer } = {}) {
+  const thread = await forumDb.threadById(threadId)
+  // The team check is here rather than in the SQL so a thread id from another
+  // Team reads as "not found" and not as "found, but not yours" — a forum is a
+  // private room and the existence of a thread in it is itself private.
+  if (!thread || thread.team_id !== teamId) return null
+  if (thread.status === 'deleted' && !canModerate) return null
+  if (thread.status === 'hidden' && !canModerate) return null
+
+  const mode = await forumSettings.imageMode()
+  const posts = await forumDb.postsByThread(threadId, { includeHidden: canModerate })
+  return {
+    ...publicThread(thread),
+    // A reply control is offered when the TYPE takes replies and the thread is
+    // open. Both halves are reported separately (`type`, `locked`) so the UI can
+    // say which one is why, but the decision itself is made here — a client that
+    // recomputed it would be a second place for the rule to live.
+    canReply: REPLYABLE_TYPES.includes(thread.type) && !thread.locked && thread.status === 'visible',
+    posts: posts.map((p) => renderPost(p, mode, viewer)),
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Open a thread: the thread and its first post, in one call.
+ *
+ * An announcement is a degenerate thread rather than its own thing (§5.1), which
+ * is why phase 5 added no migration — a discussion thread is the same two writes
+ * with a different `type`. The FIRST post is an ordinary post and is moderated,
+ * edited and reported like any other; nothing here marks it as special, because a
+ * thread whose opening post could not be moderated would be a hole shaped exactly
+ * like the one moderation exists to close.
+ */
+async function createThread({ team, actor, type, title, body }) {
+  if (!CREATABLE_TYPES.includes(type)) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'Unknown thread type' }
+  }
+  const cleaned = cleanForumBody(body)
+  if (!cleaned || !cleaned.replace(/<[^>]*>/g, '').trim()) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'A post needs a body' }
+  }
+  const threadId = await forumDb.insertThread({
+    teamId: team.id,
+    type,
+    title,
+    createdBy: actor.id,
+    createdUsername: actor.username,
+  })
+  const postId = await forumDb.insertPost({
+    threadId,
+    authorUserId: actor.id,
+    authorUsername: actor.username,
+    bodyHtml: cleaned,
+  })
+  // `notify` is what the CONTROLLER needs to fan a notification out, and it is a
+  // separate key rather than more fields on the result because the controller
+  // spreads the result straight into the response body — a notification's excerpt
+  // is not part of the API's answer to "did my post save".
+  //
+  // The notification itself is fired from the controller and not from here, on
+  // this file's own rule (see the header): everything in it takes an
+  // already-resolved access decision and reads no membership table. The fan-out
+  // reads both, so importing it here would make the forum model transitively
+  // depend on exactly what it exists not to touch.
+  return { ok: true, threadId, postId, notify: { threadId, title, type, bodyHtml: cleaned } }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Reply to a discussion thread.
+ *
+ * Three refusals, and the status codes are chosen to be distinguishable rather
+ * than uniform. A thread that is not there, or is hidden from this caller, is 404
+ * for the §5.5.1 reason. An announcement is 400 — the request is malformed for
+ * this thread, and no amount of retrying fixes it. A locked thread is **409**: the
+ * request is fine and the resource's state is what refuses, which is exactly the
+ * distinction a client needs to tell "you cannot" from "not right now".
+ *
+ * **Locked refuses staff too.** They hold `unlock`, so nothing is lost — and what
+ * is gained is that `locked` means the same thing to every reader. A moderator's
+ * reply appearing in a thread nobody else may answer is the last word by fiat;
+ * unlock, post, relock is the same outcome with three ledger rows saying so.
+ */
+async function createPost({ team, threadId, actor, body }) {
+  const thread = await forumDb.threadById(threadId)
+  if (!thread || thread.team_id !== team.id || thread.status !== 'visible') {
+    return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'Thread not found' }
+  }
+  if (!REPLYABLE_TYPES.includes(thread.type)) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'Announcements do not take replies' }
+  }
+  if (thread.locked) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 409, error: 'This thread is locked' }
+  }
+  const cleaned = cleanForumBody(body)
+  if (!cleaned || !cleaned.replace(/<[^>]*>/g, '').trim()) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'A reply needs a body' }
+  }
+  const postId = await forumDb.insertPost({
+    threadId,
+    authorUserId: actor.id,
+    authorUsername: actor.username,
+    bodyHtml: cleaned,
+  })
+  // The thread's OWN title and type, not the reply's — a reply has neither, and
+  // what a recipient needs to know is which conversation moved. `type` is always
+  // 'discussion' here (an announcement takes no replies) and is carried anyway so
+  // the controller has one shape to hand the fan-out from both routes.
+  return { ok: true, threadId, postId, notify: { threadId, title: thread.title, type: thread.type, bodyHtml: cleaned } }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Edit a post: the author inside the window, staff at any time (§5.4).
+ *
+ * The window is re-derived HERE from `created_at` and never trusted from the
+ * request, which is also why `editability` runs on the read path — the read tells
+ * the client whether to draw the control, and this decides whether the edit
+ * happens. Two evaluations of one rule, deliberately: the read one is advice and
+ * this one is enforcement.
+ *
+ * A staffer editing someone else's post is reported back as `staffEdit` so the
+ * controller can write the §5.3 accountability row. A staffer editing their OWN
+ * post is an ordinary edit and is not: the trail records interventions, and
+ * everything a staffer ever typed is not an intervention.
+ */
+async function editPost({ team, postId, actor, isStaff = false, windowMinutes = 0, body }) {
+  const post = await forumDb.postById(postId)
+  if (!post) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'Post not found' }
+
+  const thread = await forumDb.threadById(post.thread_id)
+  if (!thread || thread.team_id !== team.id) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'Post not found' }
+  if (post.status !== 'visible' || thread.status !== 'visible') {
+    return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'Post not found' }
+  }
+
+  const isAuthor = post.author_user_id != null && post.author_user_id === actor.id
+  if (!isAuthor && !isStaff) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 403, error: 'You may only edit your own posts' }
+  }
+  if (!isStaff) {
+    if (thread.locked) return { ok: false, status: 409, error: 'This thread is locked' }
+    const { canEdit } = editability(post, { userId: actor.id, windowMinutes })
+    if (!canEdit) {
+      return {
+        ok: false,
+        status: 403,
+        error: windowMinutes > 0
+          ? `The ${windowMinutes}-minute edit window for this post has closed`
+          : 'Posts cannot be edited on this site',
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  const cleaned = cleanForumBody(body)
+  if (!cleaned || !cleaned.replace(/<[^>]*>/g, '').trim()) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'A post needs a body' }
+  }
+  await forumDb.updatePostBody(postId, cleaned, actor.id)
+  return { ok: true, postId, threadId: post.thread_id, staffEdit: isStaff && !isAuthor }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Apply a moderation action to a thread, and record WHICH authority did it.
+ *
+ * `actorRole` is 'leader' or 'staff' — the column that makes a leader's ordinary
+ * housekeeping distinguishable from a staff intervention after the fact (§5.3).
+ * The caller resolves it; this function records it and never infers it, because
+ * an actor who is both would otherwise be recorded as whichever the code checked
+ * first.
+ */
+async function moderateThread({ team, threadId, action, actor, actorRole, reason }) {
+  const effect = THREAD_ACTIONS[action]
+  if (!effect) return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'Unknown moderation action' }
+
+  const thread = await forumDb.threadById(threadId)
+  if (!thread || thread.team_id !== team.id) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'Thread not found' }
+
+  await forumDb.setThreadFlags(threadId, effect)
+  await forumDb.insertModeration({
+    teamId: team.id,
+    targetType: 'thread',
+    targetId: threadId,
+    action,
+    actorUserId: actor.id,
+    actorUsername: actor.username,
+    actorRole,
+    reason,
+  })
+  return { ok: true, action, threadId }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Apply a moderation action to a POST, and record which authority did it.
+ *
+ * The same ledger as `moderateThread`, with `target_type='post'` — one table, two
+ * target kinds, because "show me everything that was moderated in this Team" is
+ * the question the admin view asks and two tables would make it a union.
+ *
+ * `pin` and `unpin`, `lock` and `unlock` are refused with a message that names the
+ * mistake rather than a bare "unknown action": they are real actions applied to
+ * the wrong kind of object, and a caller who sent one has a bug worth telling
+ * them about precisely.
+ *
+ * **The opening post of a thread is moderatable like any other.** Hiding it leaves
+ * a thread with a title and its replies and no body, which looks odd and is
+ * correct — an abusive opener does not have to take a good discussion with it, and
+ * a moderator who wants the whole thing gone has `hide` on the thread.
+ */
+async function moderatePost({ team, postId, action, actor, actorRole, reason }) {
+  const effect = POST_ACTIONS[action]
+  if (!effect) {
+    return {
+      ok: false,
+      status: 400,
+      error: THREAD_ACTIONS[action]
+        ? `"${action}" applies to a thread, not to a post`
+        : 'Unknown moderation action',
+    }
+  }
+
+  const post = await forumDb.postById(postId)
+  if (!post) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'Post not found' }
+  const thread = await forumDb.threadById(post.thread_id)
+  if (!thread || thread.team_id !== team.id) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'Post not found' }
+
+  await forumDb.setPostStatus(postId, effect.status)
+  // The counters are recomputed rather than nudged, because these four actions
+  // form cycles (hide → unhide → hide) that a delta gets wrong the first time one
+  // is retried.
+  await forumDb.recountThread(post.thread_id)
+
+  // Images follow their post. Soft on the way out and reversible on the way back
+  // in, so `delete` → `restore` inside the retention window returns the post
+  // whole; past it, the sweep has taken the bytes and nothing can.
+  if (action === 'delete') await forumDb.softDeleteUploadsForPost(postId, actor.id)
+  if (action === 'restore') await forumDb.restoreUploadsForPost(postId)
+
+  await forumDb.insertModeration({
+    teamId: team.id,
+    targetType: 'post',
+    targetId: postId,
+    action,
+    actorUserId: actor.id,
+    actorUsername: actor.username,
+    actorRole,
+    reason,
+  })
+  return { ok: true, action, postId, threadId: post.thread_id }
+}
+
+/** The ledger for the admin Team page. Staff-only by its route, not by this function. */
+async function moderationLedger(teamId, opts) {
+  return forumDb.moderationForTeam(teamId, opts)
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  CREATABLE_TYPES,
+  CREATABLE_TYPES_5A,
+  REPLYABLE_TYPES,
+  THREAD_ACTIONS,
+  POST_ACTIONS,
+  listThreads,
+  getThread,
+  createThread,
+  createPost,
+  editPost,
+  moderateThread,
+  moderatePost,
+  moderationLedger,
+  publicThread,
+  renderPost,
+  editability,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamForumSettings.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+// ── The operator's forum controls, and the acknowledgement gate ────────────
+//
+// TEAMS.md §5.5, plus phase 5's edit window. Four `settings` keys, and the reason
+// they live in their own file rather than in settings.model.js is that only two
+// of them are ordinary keys: `teams_forum_images` has a server-side precondition,
+// and a precondition buried in the generic setMany() loop is one nobody reading
+// that loop would know about.
+//
+//   teams_forums_enabled      '0' | '1'                       default '0' — off
+//   teams_forum_images        'disabled' | 'remote' | 'uploads'  default 'disabled'
+//   teams_forum_uploads_ack   the acknowledged TEXT VERSION    absent until given
+//   teams_forum_edit_window_minutes  0 … 1440                  default 15 (phase 5)
+//
+// **Every read fails closed.** A DB fault reports the forum off, images disabled
+// and the edit window shut, because the alternative is a transient error opening a
+// feature the operator turned off, or rendering third-party images on a site whose
+// operator chose not to. The cost of failing closed here is a forum that 404s for a
+// minute; the cost of failing open is a policy that is not a policy.
+
+const settingsDb = require('../settings/settings.db')
+
+const ENABLED_KEY = 'teams_forums_enabled'
+const IMAGES_KEY = 'teams_forum_images'
+const ACK_KEY = 'teams_forum_uploads_ack'
+const EDIT_WINDOW_KEY = 'teams_forum_edit_window_minutes'
+
+const IMAGE_MODES = ['disabled', 'remote', 'uploads']
+
+// How long an author may edit their own post. Staff are not bound by it (§5.4).
+const EDIT_WINDOW_DEFAULT = 15
+const EDIT_WINDOW_MAX = 1440   // a day; beyond that "window" stops meaning anything
+
+// The version of the §5.5.5 warning text currently in force. Bumping this is what
+// makes every stored acknowledgement stale — see `ackState` below for what that
+// then does, which is deliberately NOT "turn uploads off".
+const ACK_VERSION = '1'
+
+/** Is the forum switched on? Fail closed. */
+async function forumsEnabled() {
+  try {
+    return String(await settingsDb.get(ENABLED_KEY)) === '1'
+  } catch {
+    return false
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The image policy. Fail closed, and coerce any unexpected stored value back to
+ * 'disabled' — a hand-edited row must not be able to widen the policy by being
+ * unreadable.
+ */
+async function imageMode() {
+  try {
+    const value = await settingsDb.get(IMAGES_KEY)
+    return IMAGE_MODES.includes(value) ? value : 'disabled'
+  } catch {
+    return 'disabled'
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * How many minutes an author has to edit their own post.
+ *
+ * Fails closed to ZERO rather than to the default, and that is the opposite of
+ * what it looks like it should do. The risk an edit window bounds is an author
+ * rewriting a post out from under a reader who is quoting it or a moderator who
+ * is about to act on a report — so the safe answer during a DB fault is "nobody
+ * may edit for the next minute", not "everyone may edit for fifteen". Staff are
+ * unaffected either way, because their authority is not time-bounded.
+ *
+ * `0` is also a legitimate STORED value, meaning an operator who wants posts
+ * immutable once written. There is deliberately no distinction between "off" and
+ * "unreadable" here: both deny, and inventing a third state would only give the
+ * caller a decision to get wrong.
+ */
+async function editWindowMinutes() {
+  try {
+    const raw = await settingsDb.get(EDIT_WINDOW_KEY)
+    if (raw == null || raw === '') return EDIT_WINDOW_DEFAULT
+    const n = Number(raw)
+    if (!Number.isFinite(n) || n < 0 || n > EDIT_WINDOW_MAX) return EDIT_WINDOW_DEFAULT
+    return Math.floor(n)
+  } catch {
+    return 0
+  }
+}
+
+/** Are uploads accepted? The one mode where files come to rest on the operator's disk. */
+async function uploadsEnabled() {
+  return (await imageMode()) === 'uploads'
+}
+
+/**
+ * The acknowledgement's state, for the admin surface.
+ *
+ * `stale` is the case §5.5.5 spends its longest paragraph on: the text was
+ * reworded after an operator accepted it. Neither obvious answer is right —
+ * silently downgrading a live feature because a legal text changed strands users
+ * mid-conversation, and honouring an old acceptance forever defeats versioning.
+ * So uploads keep working, `stale` drives a persistent banner, and
+ * `assertSettingsWritable` below refuses every other forum setting until it is
+ * re-given. Non-destructive, and impossible to ignore.
+ */
+async function ackState() {
+  const stored = await settingsDb.get(ACK_KEY)
+  const row = await settingsDb.getRow(ACK_KEY)
+  return {
+    version: ACK_VERSION,
+    acknowledgedVersion: stored ?? null,
+    given: stored != null,
+    stale: stored != null && String(stored) !== ACK_VERSION,
+    ...(row ? { acknowledgedBy: row.updated_by_username ?? null, acknowledgedAt: row.updated_at } : {}),
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The gate. `PUT teams_forum_images = 'uploads'` is rejected 400 unless the SAME
+ * request carries `acknowledge: <currentVersion>`.
+ *
+ * The checkbox in the admin UI is not the gate — it is how the gate is presented.
+ * That distinction is the whole reason this function exists on the server: an
+ * acknowledgement a client could skip is not an acknowledgement.
+ *
+ * Returns `{ ok }` or `{ ok: false, error, status }`, matching the model result
+ * shape the Teams controllers already translate.
+ */
+async function assertAcknowledged(nextMode, acknowledge) {
+  if (nextMode !== 'uploads') return { ok: true }
+  if (String(acknowledge ?? '') === ACK_VERSION) return { ok: true }
+
+  // **The gate is on SELECTING uploads, not on the value being present.**
+  //
+  // A settings form sends every field it owns, so once uploads is on, every later
+  // save re-sends `uploads` — turning the forum off, switching back to `remote`,
+  // any of it. Demanding a fresh acknowledgement for those would make the mode a
+  // one-way door: the operator could never change a forum setting again, and the
+  // one thing they would most want to do in a hurry (switch the forum off) would
+  // be the thing refused. Found on the live rig, where unticking "Enable Team
+  // forums" came back 400.
+  //
+  // So an acknowledgement already ON RECORD, for the version in force, while
+  // uploads is ALREADY the stored mode, is what this request needs — there is no
+  // new consent to take. A transition INTO uploads still needs the checkbox, and
+  // a stale acknowledgement is caught by assertSettingsWritable, which is the
+  // separate rule for a reworded notice.
+  const [state, current] = await Promise.all([ackState(), imageMode()])
+  if (current === 'uploads' && state.given && !state.stale) return { ok: true }
+
+  return {
+    ok: false,
+    status: 400,
+    error: `Enabling uploads requires acknowledging the current notice (version ${ACK_VERSION}).`,
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The stale-acknowledgement lock: while an acknowledgement is stale, NO forum
+ * setting may be saved until it is re-given. Not "uploads are disabled" — see
+ * `ackState`. The re-acknowledgement itself is exempt, or the lock would have no
+ * key.
+ */
+async function assertSettingsWritable(keys, acknowledge) {
+  const touchesForum = keys.some((k) => k === ENABLED_KEY || k === IMAGES_KEY || k === EDIT_WINDOW_KEY)
+  if (!touchesForum) return { ok: true }
+  const state = await ackState()
+  if (!state.stale) return { ok: true }
+  if (String(acknowledge ?? '') === ACK_VERSION) return { ok: true }
+  return {
+    ok: false,
+    status: 400,
+    error: 'The image-upload notice has changed. Re-acknowledge it before saving forum settings.',
+  }
+}
+
+/** Record the acknowledgement. `updated_by`/`updated_at` come free from the settings schema. */
+async function recordAck(adminUserId) {
+  await settingsDb.set(ACK_KEY, ACK_VERSION, adminUserId)
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  ENABLED_KEY,
+  IMAGES_KEY,
+  ACK_KEY,
+  EDIT_WINDOW_KEY,
+  IMAGE_MODES,
+  ACK_VERSION,
+  EDIT_WINDOW_DEFAULT,
+  EDIT_WINDOW_MAX,
+  forumsEnabled,
+  imageMode,
+  editWindowMinutes,
+  uploadsEnabled,
+  ackState,
+  assertAcknowledged,
+  assertSettingsWritable,
+  recordAck,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamForumUploads.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+// ── `uploads` mode, and what had to harden first (TEAMS.md §5.5.4) ─────────
+//
+// The existing admin upload path (router/v1/admin/imageUpload.js) is already good
+// for an admin: an 8 MB cap, a mimetype allowlist, a random filename, an extension
+// derived from the MIMETYPE MAP and never from `originalname`, and
+// `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` forced on serve. All of that is kept and this
+// file adds the four things that path never needed, because until now it has never
+// had a hostile uploader.
+//
+//   1. MAGIC-BYTE SNIFFING. `file.mimetype` is the client's own Content-Type
+//      header. A player can send `image/png` with arbitrary bytes and land
+//      arbitrary content under a `.png`. Trusted from an admin, not from a player.
+//   2. QUOTAS. A per-post attachment cap and a per-account daily byte quota.
+//      Community uploads with no ceiling is disk exhaustion on the operator's own
+//      host. (The per-request RATE limit is core's rateLimit middleware, applied
+//      at the route.)
+//   3. ATTRIBUTION. Every accepted file gets a `team_forum_uploads` row. Not
+//      bookkeeping: the acknowledgement in §5.5.5 is meaningless if "who uploaded
+//      this" cannot be answered afterwards.
+//   4. LIFECYCLE. Deleting a post soft-deletes its uploads; the sweep removes the
+//      bytes after a retention window, and files with no row at all. The admin
+//      upload path never deletes anything, which is fine at admin volume and is
+//      not fine here.
+
+const fs = require('fs/promises')
+const path = require('path')
+
+const forumDb = require('./teamForum.db')
+const { UPLOAD_DIR } = require('../../router/v1/admin/imageUpload')
+
+// Leading bytes → the type they actually are. Deliberately not a library: five
+// signatures, checked exactly, is less surface than a dependency that accepts
+// hundreds of formats when the allowlist only wants these.
+//
+// WebP and AVIF are container formats, so both need a second check past the first
+// four bytes — RIFF alone is also .wav, and the `ftyp` box also fronts .mp4.
+const SIGNATURES = [
+  { mime: 'image/png', test: (b) => b.subarray(0, 8).equals(Buffer.from([0x89, 0x50, 0x4e, 0x47, 0x0d, 0x0a, 0x1a, 0x0a])) },
+  { mime: 'image/jpeg', test: (b) => b[0] === 0xff && b[1] === 0xd8 && b[2] === 0xff },
+  { mime: 'image/gif', test: (b) => b.subarray(0, 6).toString('latin1').match(/^GIF8[79]a$/) != null },
+  {
+    mime: 'image/webp',
+    test: (b) => b.subarray(0, 4).toString('latin1') === 'RIFF' && b.subarray(8, 12).toString('latin1') === 'WEBP',
+  },
+  {
+    mime: 'image/avif',
+    test: (b) => b.subarray(4, 8).toString('latin1') === 'ftyp'
+      && ['avif', 'avis'].includes(b.subarray(8, 12).toString('latin1')),
+  },
+]
+
+// Per-post attachment cap and per-account rolling byte quota.
+const MAX_ATTACHMENTS_PER_POST = 6
+const DAILY_QUOTA_BYTES = 25 * 1024 * 1024
+const QUOTA_WINDOW_HOURS = 24
+
+// Lifecycle windows. A soft-deleted file survives long enough for a mis-click to
+// be recoverable; an orphan is one uploaded into a composer that was never
+// submitted, which is a normal thing to do and so gets a generous grace.
+const RETENTION_DAYS = 30
+const ORPHAN_GRACE_HOURS = 48
+
+/**
+ * What do these bytes actually claim to be?
+ *
+ * Returns the sniffed mimetype, or null when nothing matches. Null is a rejection
+ * and never a "trust the header instead" — an unrecognised file is exactly the
+ * case this check exists for.
+ */
+function sniff(buffer) {
+  if (!Buffer.isBuffer(buffer) || buffer.length < 12) return null
+  return SIGNATURES.find((s) => s.test(buffer))?.mime || null
+}
+
+/**
+ * Accept a file multer has already written to disk.
+ *
+ * The file is on disk before it can be sniffed — multer streams it there — so the
+ * rejection path has to REMOVE it. A rejected upload that stays on disk is exactly
+ * the disk-exhaustion vector the quota exists to close, reached by a different
+ * route.
+ */
+async function accept({ team, actor, file }) {
+  const stored = path.join(UPLOAD_DIR, file.filename)
+  const discard = async () => { await fs.rm(stored, { force: true }) }
+
+  let head
+  try {
+    const handle = await fs.open(stored, 'r')
+    try {
+      head = Buffer.alloc(16)
+      await handle.read(head, 0, 16, 0)
+    } finally {
+      await handle.close()
+    }
+  } catch {
+    await discard()
+    return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'Could not read the uploaded file' }
+  }
+
+  const sniffed = sniff(head)
+  if (!sniffed || sniffed !== file.mimetype) {
+    await discard()
+    return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'That file is not the image type it claims to be' }
+  }
+
+  const used = await forumDb.bytesUploadedSince(actor.id, QUOTA_WINDOW_HOURS)
+  if (used + file.size > DAILY_QUOTA_BYTES) {
+    await discard()
+    return { ok: false, status: 429, error: 'Daily upload limit reached. Try again tomorrow.' }
+  }
+
+  const id = await forumDb.insertUpload({
+    teamId: team.id,
+    postId: null,          // attached when the post that embeds it is written
+    uploaderUserId: actor.id,
+    uploaderUsername: actor.username,
+    filename: file.filename,
+    mimetype: sniffed,     // the SNIFFED type, never the client's header
+    byteSize: file.size,
+  })
+  return { ok: true, id, url: `/uploads/${file.filename}`, bytes: file.size }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Remove an upload. The uploader may, within the edit window; staff may at any
+ * time. Soft — the bytes go with the sweep, not with the button.
+ */
+async function remove({ id, actor, isStaff }) {
+  const row = await forumDb.uploadById(id)
+  if (!row || row.deleted_at) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'No such upload' }
+  if (!isStaff && row.uploader_user_id !== actor.id) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 403, error: 'Not your upload' }
+  }
+  await forumDb.softDeleteUpload(id, actor.id)
+  return { ok: true }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The nightly sweep: bytes for soft-deleted rows past retention, plus files on
+ * disk with no row at all.
+ *
+ * The orphan half deliberately only considers files whose names match the upload
+ * naming scheme AND appear in no row. UPLOAD_DIR is shared with the admin upload
+ * path, whose files have no row here and must never be swept — so the sweep works
+ * from the FORUM's own rows outward and never from the directory listing inward.
+ */
+async function sweep({ retentionDays = RETENTION_DAYS, orphanGraceHours = ORPHAN_GRACE_HOURS } = {}) {
+  const expired = await forumDb.sweepableUploads(retentionDays)
+  const orphans = await forumDb.orphanedUploads(orphanGraceHours)
+  const doomed = [...expired, ...orphans]
+  const cleared = []
+  for (const row of doomed) {
+    try {
+      await fs.rm(path.join(UPLOAD_DIR, row.filename), { force: true })
+      cleared.push(row.id)
+    } catch {
+      // Leave the ROW as well as the file. A file we could not delete is one the
+      // next run should try again, and dropping its row would lose the only
+      // record that the bytes are still there.
+    }
+  }
+  await forumDb.deleteUploadRows(cleared)
+  return { swept: doomed.length, filesRemoved: cleared.length }
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  MAX_ATTACHMENTS_PER_POST,
+  DAILY_QUOTA_BYTES,
+  QUOTA_WINDOW_HOURS,
+  RETENTION_DAYS,
+  ORPHAN_GRACE_HOURS,
+  sniff,
+  accept,
+  remove,
+  sweep,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamGrants.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+// ── The grant/revoke flow (TEAMS.md §2.5 path 3) ───────────────────────────
+//
+// The RESOLVER lives in teamAccess.model.js and answers "may this account use the
+// forum". This file is the WRITE half: who may hand that access out, to whom, and
+// what stops a leader turning a Team forum into open hosting on the operator's
+// site.
+//
+// **Two authorities, and they are not the same authority with different reach.**
+//
+//   staff  (admin | moderator) — any Team, no cap, may revoke anything
+//   leader (path 2, on THIS Team) — own Team, capped, may not revoke a staff grant
+//
+// The last clause is the one worth stating: a leader who could revoke a
+// staff-issued grant could undo a moderation decision, which is the whole reason
+// `granted_by` is retained rather than collapsed into a boolean.
+//
+// **Nothing here writes `team_members`, in either direction, ever.** A grant is
+// not a membership: it may name any Runic Gateway account, including one with no
+// linked game identity at all — that is the point of it, since letting an unlinked
+// guildmate into the forum must not be a staff ticket. `teams.model.js` keeps such
+// an account off the roster and out of every membership count, and path 4 keeps it
+// off external platforms.
+
+const accessDb = require('./teamAccess.db')
+const teamsDb = require('./teams.db')
+const access = require('./teamAccess.model')
+const usersDb = require('../users/users.db')
+const settingsDb = require('../settings/settings.db')
+
+// The per-Team ceiling on ACTIVE leader-issued grants. A leader admitting
+// unlimited arbitrary accounts to a private space on the operator's host is a
+// quiet way to turn a Team forum into free hosting; the cap is what makes it a
+// decision the operator made rather than one a leader made for them.
+const CAP_KEY = 'teams_max_grants_per_team'
+const DEFAULT_CAP = 50
+
+const STAFF_ROLES = ['admin', 'moderator']
+
+async function grantCap() {
+  const raw = await settingsDb.get(CAP_KEY)
+  const n = Number.parseInt(raw, 10)
+  return Number.isFinite(n) && n > 0 ? n : DEFAULT_CAP
+}
+
+const isStaff = (actor) => STAFF_ROLES.includes(actor?.role)
+
+/**
+ * What may this actor do with grants on this Team?
+ *
+ * Resolved once and returned whole, so the controller asks a question rather than
+ * assembling the answer from three booleans — the shape that lets a leader check
+ * and a staff check drift apart.
+ */
+async function authorityFor(teamId, actor) {
+  if (isStaff(actor)) return { may: true, as: 'staff' }
+  const leads = await access.isLeaderByUser(teamId, actor?.id)
+  return { may: leads, as: leads ? 'leader' : null }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Issue a grant. Returns the model result shape the Teams controllers translate:
+ * `{ ok }` or `{ ok: false, status, error }`.
+ *
+ * `warning` on a staff grant past the cap is deliberate and is not an error:
+ * staff are exempt, and silently exceeding a ceiling the operator configured is
+ * worth saying out loud on the way past.
+ */
+async function grant({ team, actor, userId, username, reason }) {
+  const authority = await authorityFor(team.id, actor)
+  if (!authority.may) return { ok: false, status: 403, error: 'Not a leader of this Team' }
+
+  const target = userId
+    ? await usersDb.findById(userId)
+    : await usersDb.findByUsername(username)
+  if (!target) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'No such account' }
+
+  const existing = await accessDb.activeGrant(team.id, target.id)
+  if (existing) return { ok: false, status: 409, error: 'That account already has an active grant' }
+
+  const cap = await grantCap()
+  const count = await accessDb.activeGrantCount(team.id)
+  let warning = null
+  if (count >= cap) {
+    if (authority.as === 'leader') {
+      return { ok: false, status: 409, error: `This Team has reached its limit of ${cap} forum guests` }
+    }
+    warning = `This Team is past the configured limit of ${cap} forum guests`
+  }
+
+  await accessDb.insertGrant({
+    teamId: team.id,
+    userId: target.id,
+    username: target.username,
+    grantedBy: actor.id,
+    grantedUsername: actor.username,
+    reason,
+  })
+  return { ok: true, as: authority.as, grantee: target.username, ...(warning ? { warning } : {}) }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Revoke a grant.
+ *
+ * The one asymmetry with `grant`: a leader may not revoke what staff issued.
+ * Checked against `granted_by`'s role AT REVOKE TIME rather than against a stored
+ * flag, so an account that has since lost its staff role stops protecting the
+ * grants it made — which is the behaviour an operator demoting someone expects.
+ */
+async function revoke({ team, actor, userId, reason }) {
+  const authority = await authorityFor(team.id, actor)
+  if (!authority.may) return { ok: false, status: 403, error: 'Not a leader of this Team' }
+
+  const existing = await accessDb.activeGrant(team.id, userId)
+  if (!existing) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'No active grant for that account' }
+
+  if (authority.as === 'leader' && existing.granted_by) {
+    const issuer = await usersDb.findById(existing.granted_by)
+    if (isStaff(issuer)) {
+      return { ok: false, status: 403, error: 'That access was granted by staff and only staff may revoke it' }
+    }
+  }
+
+  await accessDb.revokeGrant({
+    teamId: team.id,
+    userId,
+    revokedBy: actor.id,
+    revokedUsername: actor.username,
+    reason,
+  })
+  return { ok: true, as: authority.as, grantee: existing.username }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The Team's forum guests — active grants for accounts that are NOT members.
+ *
+ * The subtraction is the §3.2 "Forum guests" list: someone who is both a member
+ * and a grantee is a member, listed on the roster, and appears here not at all.
+ * Both facts stay true in the ledger; only the presentation picks one.
+ */
+async function forumGuests(teamId) {
+  const [grants, members] = await Promise.all([
+    accessDb.activeGrants(teamId),
+    teamsDb.membersByTeam(teamId, { includeDeparted: false }),
+  ])
+  const memberUserIds = new Set(members.map((m) => m.user_id).filter((id) => id != null))
+  return grants
+    .filter((g) => g.user_id == null || !memberUserIds.has(g.user_id))
+    .map((g) => ({
+      userId: g.user_id,
+      username: g.username,
+      grantedBy: g.granted_username,
+      grantedAt: g.granted_at,
+      reason: g.reason,
+    }))
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  CAP_KEY,
+  DEFAULT_CAP,
+  // Exported since phase 7: the Discord dispatcher's `access: 'staff'` has to
+  // mean the same two roles every other Team surface means by it, and a second
+  // copy of the list is a copy that drifts.
+  STAFF_ROLES,
+  grantCap,
+  authorityFor,
+  grant,
+  revoke,
+  forumGuests,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamIntegration.db.js

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+// SQL for the integration bridge's configuration (TEAMS.md §7.2, phase 8).
+//
+// One table, and almost all of its subtlety is in the schema comment rather than
+// here: `team_key` is a generated `IFNULL(team_id, 0)`, so the deployment-wide
+// default and the per-Team overrides live under one UNIQUE key without the
+// default row needing a NULL in a primary key it cannot have.
+//
+// **Reads join `teams` and callers get the Team's name.** Not for display alone:
+// the resolver's answer is the input to a message that names a Team, and a second
+// round trip per notification to fetch a name the first query already walked past
+// is the kind of thing that only shows up under a busy forum.
+
+const { query } = require('../../utils/db')
+
+const COLUMNS = `
+  c.id, c.platform, c.team_id, c.events, c.channel_ref, c.enabled,
+  c.members_ack, c.members_ack_by, c.members_ack_at, c.updated_at`
+
+/**
+ * Every row for a platform — the default first, then the overrides by Team name.
+ *
+ * The admin panel's whole listing, in one query. `team_name` is NULL on exactly
+ * one row (the default), which is also how the client tells them apart without
+ * needing to reason about `team_id`.
+ */
+async function listForPlatform(platform) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT ${COLUMNS}, t.name AS team_name, t.slug AS team_slug, t.display_name_override,
+            u.username AS members_ack_username
+       FROM team_integration_config c
+       LEFT JOIN teams t ON t.id = c.team_id
+       LEFT JOIN users u ON u.id = c.members_ack_by
+      WHERE c.platform = ?
+      ORDER BY c.team_id IS NOT NULL, COALESCE(t.name, '')`,
+    [platform],
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * The row that governs `teamId`, or null.
+ *
+ * `team_key` is what makes this one query rather than two: asking for the pair
+ * (0, teamId) returns the default and the override together, and `ORDER BY
+ * team_key DESC LIMIT 1` puts the override first when it exists. A caller that
+ * fetched the default and then looked for an override would do two round trips
+ * per notification for an answer the index already holds.
+ */
+async function resolveFor(platform, teamId) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT ${COLUMNS}, t.name AS team_name, t.display_name_override
+       FROM team_integration_config c
+       LEFT JOIN teams t ON t.id = c.team_id
+      WHERE c.platform = ? AND c.team_key IN (0, ?)
+      ORDER BY c.team_key DESC
+      LIMIT 1`,
+    [platform, Number(teamId)],
+  )
+  return rows[0] || null
+}
+
+async function getById(id) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT ${COLUMNS}, t.name AS team_name FROM team_integration_config c
+       LEFT JOIN teams t ON t.id = c.team_id
+      WHERE c.id = ? LIMIT 1`,
+    [Number(id)],
+  )
+  return rows[0] || null
+}
+
+async function getForTeam(platform, teamId) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT ${COLUMNS} FROM team_integration_config c
+      WHERE c.platform = ? AND c.team_key = ? LIMIT 1`,
+    [platform, teamId === null || teamId === undefined ? 0 : Number(teamId)],
+  )
+  return rows[0] || null
+}
+
+/**
+ * Create or replace the row for (platform, team).
+ *
+ * A full replace rather than a patch, and the acknowledgement columns are part of
+ * what is replaced — the model decides what they should be, because "did the
+ * channel change" is a comparison against the row that is about to be overwritten
+ * and only the model has both halves.
+ */
+async function upsert({ platform, teamId, events, channelRef, enabled, membersAck, membersAckBy, membersAckAt }) {
+  await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_integration_config
+       (platform, team_id, events, channel_ref, enabled, members_ack, members_ack_by, members_ack_at)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
+     ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
+       events = VALUES(events),
+       channel_ref = VALUES(channel_ref),
+       enabled = VALUES(enabled),
+       members_ack = VALUES(members_ack),
+       members_ack_by = VALUES(members_ack_by),
+       members_ack_at = VALUES(members_ack_at)`,
+    [
+      platform,
+      teamId === null || teamId === undefined ? null : Number(teamId),
+      JSON.stringify(events || []),
+      channelRef || null,
+      enabled ? 1 : 0,
+      membersAck ? 1 : 0,
+      membersAckBy || null,
+      membersAckAt || null,
+    ],
+  )
+  return getForTeam(platform, teamId)
+}
+
+async function remove(platform, teamId) {
+  const res = await query('DELETE FROM team_integration_config WHERE platform = ? AND team_key = ?', [
+    platform,
+    teamId === null || teamId === undefined ? 0 : Number(teamId),
+  ])
+  return Number(res && res.affectedRows) || 0
+}
+
+module.exports = { listForPlatform, resolveFor, getById, getForTeam, upsert, remove }

server/src/model/teams/teamIntegration.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,272 @@
+// ── The integration bridge's configuration and its one precondition ────────
+//
+// TEAMS.md §7.2, phase 8. An operator says "send these Team events to this
+// Discord channel", globally or for one Team, and this file is where that
+// sentence is validated, stored and resolved.
+//
+// **Two of the four streams can never be public, and that is the whole reason
+// this file is more than a settings row.** §7.2 gates bridging on "the event's
+// visibility is public, or the destination channel is configured for a
+// members-only Team context". Neither half exists in the tree and neither can:
+// the four `team.*` streams carry no visibility (only `team_activity` rows do,
+// and a notification is not an activity row), forum threads have no public/
+// members column because a forum is members-only by construction — everything in
+// it sits behind `team_forum_grants` — and core cannot see a Discord channel's
+// permissions to know what it is.
+//
+// Only the operator can see that. So the gate becomes an ATTRIBUTED
+// ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: enabling a members-only event requires an explicit tick that
+// the destination is restricted to that Team's members, recorded with who gave it
+// and when, in the same shape `teams_forum_uploads_ack` records the image-policy
+// one. It is a precondition, not a preference — `assertEnableable` refuses the
+// save rather than quietly dropping the event at delivery time, because a config
+// that silently does less than it says is worse than one that will not save.
+//
+// **Changing the channel clears the acknowledgement.** An acknowledgement is
+// about a destination; it cannot survive the destination changing underneath it,
+// or an operator would tick "this channel is private", then repoint the row at a
+// public one and keep the permission they were granted for a different place.
+//
+// **Every read fails closed**, like `teamForumSettings`: a DB fault reports no
+// bridge configured, because the cost of failing closed is a Discord channel that
+// stays quiet for a minute and the cost of failing open is members-only text in a
+// room the operator never approved.
+
+const db = require('./teamIntegration.db')
+const log = require('../../utils/logger')('team-integration')
+
+// The only platform phase 8 knows. Deliberately a value rather than a hardcoded
+// literal at every call site: phase 10 turns this into a lookup against the
+// declared-capability registry, and the fewer places that spell 'discord' the
+// smaller that change is.
+const DISCORD = 'discord'
+const PLATFORMS = [DISCORD]
+
+// The four §6.2 streams, and which of them can reach a channel core cannot vet.
+//
+// A stream is members-only if the CONTENT behind it is: `team.forum.post` and
+// `team.announcement` both name a thread nobody outside the Team may read. The
+// roster pair is public — Team pages and rosters are public by §1's projection
+// rules — so bridging those asserts nothing and needs no tick.
+const BRIDGEABLE = [
+  'team.member.joined',
+  'team.leadership.changed',
+  'team.forum.post',
+  'team.announcement',
+]
+
+const MEMBERS_ONLY = new Set(['team.forum.post', 'team.announcement'])
+
+// Discord snowflakes are 17-20 digits today and the format is not promised. The
+// check is only that a channel ref is plausibly one and cannot smuggle anything —
+// core treats it as opaque and the bot is what resolves it.
+const CHANNEL_RE = /^[0-9]{5,32}$/
+
+const isMembersOnly = (streamId) => MEMBERS_ONLY.has(streamId)
+
+/** Does this event list contain anything that would publish members-only text? */
+const needsAck = (events) => (events || []).some(isMembersOnly)
+
+/**
+ * Normalise an operator-supplied event list.
+ *
+ * Unknown ids are REJECTED rather than dropped. A silently-dropped event is a
+ * config screen that shows you saved something you did not, and the set is small
+ * and fixed enough that a typo is a mistake worth reporting.
+ */
+function normaliseEvents(events) {
+  if (!Array.isArray(events)) {
+    const err = new Error('events must be an array')
+    err.status = 400
+    throw err
+  }
+  const seen = []
+  for (const raw of events) {
+    const id = String(raw || '').trim()
+    if (!BRIDGEABLE.includes(id)) {
+      const err = new Error(`unknown event: ${id}`)
+      err.status = 400
+      throw err
+    }
+    if (!seen.includes(id)) seen.push(id)
+  }
+  return seen
+}
+
+function normaliseChannel(channelRef) {
+  const value = String(channelRef || '').trim()
+  if (!value) return null
+  if (!CHANNEL_RE.test(value)) {
+    const err = new Error('channel must be a numeric channel id')
+    err.status = 400
+    throw err
+  }
+  return value
+}
+
+/**
+ * The gate, as a throw.
+ *
+ * Order matters to the message an operator reads: an enabled row with no channel
+ * is a different mistake from one with an unacknowledged channel, and reporting
+ * the second when the first is true would send them to tick a box that would not
+ * have helped.
+ */
+function assertEnableable({ enabled, events, channelRef, membersAck }) {
+  if (!enabled) return
+  if (!channelRef) {
+    const err = new Error('a destination channel is required to enable this bridge')
+    err.status = 422
+    throw err
+  }
+  if (events.length === 0) {
+    const err = new Error('at least one event is required to enable this bridge')
+    err.status = 422
+    throw err
+  }
+  if (needsAck(events) && !membersAck) {
+    const err = new Error(
+      'forum posts and announcements are visible only to a Team’s members — confirm the destination channel is restricted to them before enabling',
+    )
+    err.status = 422
+    err.code = 'members_ack_required'
+    throw err
+  }
+}
+
+/** Rows for the admin panel, `events` already parsed. */
+async function list(platform = DISCORD) {
+  const rows = await db.listForPlatform(platform)
+  return rows.map(shape)
+}
+
+/**
+ * Parse the stored JSON once, here.
+ *
+ * `mariadb` hands a JSON column back as a string on some server versions and as a
+ * parsed value on others, which is a difference nobody wants to rediscover in a
+ * controller. Anything unreadable becomes an empty list rather than a throw: a
+ * row with a corrupt event list should render as a row that bridges nothing, not
+ * take the whole admin page down.
+ */
+function shape(row) {
+  if (!row) return null
+  let events = row.events
+  if (typeof events === 'string') {
+    try {
+      events = JSON.parse(events)
+    } catch {
+      events = []
+    }
+  }
+  return { ...row, events: Array.isArray(events) ? events : [], enabled: !!row.enabled, members_ack: !!row.members_ack }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The row that governs `teamId` — the override if there is one, otherwise the
+ * deployment default — filtered down to what may actually be delivered.
+ *
+ * **The acknowledgement is checked HERE as well as at the save.** A row saved
+ * with the tick can lose it later: an admin repoints the channel, or a future
+ * change to what counts as members-only reclassifies a stream a row already
+ * carries. Re-asking at delivery is what makes the tick a live property of the
+ * row rather than a note about a save that happened once.
+ */
+async function resolve(teamId, platform = DISCORD) {
+  try {
+    const row = shape(await db.resolveFor(platform, teamId))
+    if (!row || !row.enabled || !row.channel_ref) return null
+    const events = row.events.filter((id) => (isMembersOnly(id) ? row.members_ack : true))
+    if (events.length === 0) return null
+    return { ...row, events }
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.warn('bridge config lookup failed — treating as unconfigured', {
+      teamId,
+      platform,
+      message: err.message,
+    })
+    return null
+  }
+}
+
+/** Is `streamId` bridged for this Team? The delivery path's whole question. */
+async function destinationFor(teamId, streamId, platform = DISCORD) {
+  const row = await resolve(teamId, platform)
+  if (!row || !row.events.includes(streamId)) return null
+  return { channelRef: row.channel_ref, membersOnly: isMembersOnly(streamId), platform }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Create or replace the row for (platform, team).
+ *
+ * `actorId` is the admin doing the saving, and it is what lands in
+ * `members_ack_by` — the acknowledgement names a person, so it cannot be written
+ * by a path that does not know who they are.
+ */
+async function save({ platform = DISCORD, teamId = null, events, channelRef, enabled, membersAck }, actorId) {
+  if (!PLATFORMS.includes(platform)) {
+    const err = new Error(`unknown platform: ${platform}`)
+    err.status = 400
+    throw err
+  }
+
+  const nextEvents = normaliseEvents(events)
+  const nextChannel = normaliseChannel(channelRef)
+  const existing = shape(await db.getForTeam(platform, teamId))
+
+  // An acknowledgement survives an ordinary edit and dies with the channel it was
+  // given for. `membersAck === false` from the client is an explicit withdrawal
+  // and is honoured; `undefined` means "leave it", which is what a save that only
+  // toggled an event should do.
+  const channelChanged = !!existing && existing.channel_ref !== nextChannel
+  let ack = existing ? existing.members_ack : false
+  if (membersAck === false) ack = false
+  else if (membersAck === true) ack = true
+  if (channelChanged) ack = membersAck === true
+
+  const nextEnabled = !!enabled
+  assertEnableable({ enabled: nextEnabled, events: nextEvents, channelRef: nextChannel, membersAck: ack })
+
+  // Re-stamp only when the acknowledgement is newly given, so an unrelated save
+  // does not rewrite the date on a decision nobody revisited.
+  //
+  // `channelChanged` belongs in this condition and it is easy to leave out: an
+  // acknowledgement given alongside a NEW channel is a new acknowledgement even
+  // though the column was already 1, and without it the row keeps naming whoever
+  // vetted the PREVIOUS destination. That attribution is the whole audit value of
+  // the column — it has to name the person who looked at the channel the row now
+  // points at.
+  const freshlyAcked = ack && (channelChanged || !(existing && existing.members_ack))
+  const row = await db.upsert({
+    platform,
+    teamId,
+    events: nextEvents,
+    channelRef: nextChannel,
+    enabled: nextEnabled,
+    membersAck: ack,
+    membersAckBy: ack ? (freshlyAcked ? actorId : existing.members_ack_by) : null,
+    membersAckAt: ack ? (freshlyAcked ? new Date() : existing.members_ack_at) : null,
+  })
+  return shape(row)
+}
+
+async function remove(platform, teamId) {
+  return db.remove(platform, teamId)
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  DISCORD,
+  PLATFORMS,
+  BRIDGEABLE,
+  MEMBERS_ONLY,
+  isMembersOnly,
+  needsAck,
+  normaliseEvents,
+  normaliseChannel,
+  assertEnableable,
+  list,
+  resolve,
+  destinationFor,
+  save,
+  remove,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamModeration.db.js

@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+// SQL for the reserved-name review queue and the §2.9 approval queue.
+
+const { query } = require('../../utils/db')
+
+// ── The hide/display state on `teams` ──────────────────────────────────────
+
+async function setHidden(teamId, { hidden, reason, term }) {
+  await query(
+    'UPDATE teams SET hidden = ?, hidden_reason = ?, hidden_term = ? WHERE id = ?',
+    [hidden ? 1 : 0, hidden ? reason : null, hidden ? term || null : null, teamId],
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * Record that a human has decided about this name.
+ *
+ * What makes a staff decision STICKY (§2.8.3). Re-screening runs on every sync,
+ * and without this stamp an operator adding a reserved term — or simply renaming
+ * the deployment — would re-hide a Team staff had already allowed, every fifteen
+ * minutes, forever.
+ */
+async function markNameReviewed(teamId) {
+  await query('UPDATE teams SET name_reviewed_at = NOW() WHERE id = ?', [teamId])
+}
+
+async function setDisplayNameOverride(teamId, displayName) {
+  await query('UPDATE teams SET display_name_override = ? WHERE id = ?', [displayName, teamId])
+}
+
+/** Active teams whose name has never been screened by a human. */
+async function unreviewedActive(moduleId) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT id, name, hidden, hidden_reason FROM teams
+     WHERE module_id = ? AND status = 'active' AND name_reviewed_at IS NULL`,
+    [moduleId],
+  )
+}
+
+/** The reserved-name review queue (§2.8.3). */
+async function reviewQueue() {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT id, name, slug, hidden_term, display_name_override, member_count, created_at
+     FROM teams
+     WHERE status = 'active' AND hidden = 1 AND hidden_reason = 'reserved_name' AND name_reviewed_at IS NULL
+     ORDER BY created_at DESC`,
+  )
+}
+
+// ── team_moderation_requests (§2.9) ────────────────────────────────────────
+
+const REQUEST_COLUMNS = `
+  id, team_id, action, payload, reason, requested_by, requested_username, requested_at,
+  status, decided_by, decided_username, decided_at, decision_note`
+
+async function insertRequest({ teamId, action, payload, reason, requestedBy, requestedUsername }) {
+  const res = await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_moderation_requests
+       (team_id, action, payload, reason, requested_by, requested_username)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+    [teamId, action, payload == null ? null : JSON.stringify(payload), reason, requestedBy, requestedUsername],
+  )
+  return res.insertId
+}
+
+async function findRequest(id) {
+  const rows = await query(`SELECT ${REQUEST_COLUMNS} FROM team_moderation_requests WHERE id = ?`, [id])
+  return rows[0]
+}
+
+/** The approval queue. Decided rows are kept — see §2.9 — so `status` is a filter. */
+async function listRequests({ status = 'pending', limit = 100 } = {}) {
+  const params = []
+  let sql = `SELECT r.${REQUEST_COLUMNS.trim().split(/,\s*/).join(', r.')},
+                    t.name AS team_name, t.slug AS team_slug
+             FROM team_moderation_requests r JOIN teams t ON t.id = r.team_id`
+  if (status !== 'all') {
+    sql += ' WHERE r.status = ?'
+    params.push(status)
+  }
+  sql += ' ORDER BY r.requested_at DESC, r.id DESC LIMIT ?'
+  params.push(limit)
+  return query(sql, params)
+}
+
+/**
+ * Decide a request, but only if it is still pending.
+ *
+ * The `status = 'pending'` guard is the concurrency control: two admins opening
+ * the same queue and both clicking approve would otherwise each apply the action,
+ * and the second would overwrite the first's record of who decided it. The caller
+ * applies the effect only when this reports a row was actually moved.
+ */
+async function decideRequest(id, { status, decidedBy, decidedUsername, note }) {
+  const res = await query(
+    `UPDATE team_moderation_requests
+     SET status = ?, decided_by = ?, decided_username = ?, decided_at = NOW(), decision_note = ?
+     WHERE id = ? AND status = 'pending'`,
+    [status, decidedBy, decidedUsername, note, id],
+  )
+  return res.affectedRows > 0
+}
+
+/** Pending requests for one team — shown on its admin page so a second is not filed. */
+async function pendingForTeam(teamId) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT ${REQUEST_COLUMNS} FROM team_moderation_requests
+     WHERE team_id = ? AND status = 'pending' ORDER BY requested_at`,
+    [teamId],
+  )
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  setHidden,
+  markNameReviewed,
+  setDisplayNameOverride,
+  unreviewedActive,
+  reviewQueue,
+  insertRequest,
+  findRequest,
+  listRequests,
+  decideRequest,
+  pendingForTeam,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamModeration.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
+// ── Impersonation controls, and the approval gate on them ──────────────────
+//
+// TEAMS.md §2.8–§2.9. Two things live here:
+//
+//   1. **Auto-hide**, which turns a reserved-name match into a suppressed Team
+//      and a review queue entry rather than into a refusal. Core cannot refuse a
+//      name — the guild exists in the game and core is a mirror of it.
+//
+//   2. **The approval gate**, which is scoped to the three actions that RELEASE
+//      untrusted game-sourced strings onto public surfaces, and to nothing else.
+//
+// **The gate's scope is the part most likely to be misread.** It is not a general
+// staff-approval workflow. Ordinary forum grants, leadership overrides, archives
+// and forum moderation all still apply immediately and are audited, exactly as
+// before. Three actions are gated, and the question that admits a fourth is
+// always the same one: *does this publish untrusted game data?*
+//
+//   - clearing a reserved_name hide       — publishes a name that tripped the list
+//   - setting a display_name_override     — substitutes free text into the same
+//                                           public surfaces
+//   - un-hiding a staff-hidden Team       — reverses a deliberate suppression
+//
+// **Moderator-initiated, admin-approved — never four-eyes on admins.** `users.role`
+// defaults to admin and `npm run seed` creates exactly one, so most deployments
+// have precisely one admin. A rule requiring a second would wedge them with no
+// way out, which is a worse failure than the one it guards against.
+
+const moderationDb = require('./teamModeration.db')
+const teamsDb = require('./teams.db')
+const reservedNames = require('../../utils/reservedNames')
+const activity = require('../activity/activity.model')
+const log = require('../../utils/logger')('teams')
+
+const GATED_ACTIONS = ['unhide', 'display_name_override', 'clear_display_name_override']
+
+const isAdmin = (actor) => Boolean(actor) && actor.role === 'admin'
+
+/**
+ * Screen a name and return the columns a create should carry.
+ *
+ * Never throws: screening reads settings, and a database hiccup during a
+ * reconcile must not stop a Team being created. It fails OPEN on the create — the
+ * Team appears — because the re-screen on the next sync will catch it, and a
+ * reconcile that aborts halfway is worse than a name that is public for one
+ * interval. That is a deliberate trade and it is the reason re-screening exists
+ * at all rather than being a create-time-only check.
+ */
+async function screenForCreate(name) {
+  try {
+    const { reserved, term } = await reservedNames.screen(name)
+    if (!reserved) return { hidden: false }
+    log.warn('team auto-hidden: its name matched a reserved term', { name, term })
+    return { hidden: true, hiddenReason: 'reserved_name', hiddenTerm: term }
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.error('reserved-name screening failed; the team is created unscreened', {
+      name, message: err.message,
+    })
+    return { hidden: false }
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Re-screen every active Team whose name no human has ruled on.
+ *
+ * Names are immutable per row, so this only ever changes an outcome when the TERM
+ * LIST changed — an operator adding a term, or the deployment being renamed. That
+ * is precisely the case a create-time-only check would miss forever.
+ *
+ * A Team staff have already decided about is skipped, and that stickiness is the
+ * point: without it, an override would be undone on the next sweep.
+ */
+async function rescreen(moduleId) {
+  let hidden = 0
+  try {
+    const rows = await moderationDb.unreviewedActive(moduleId)
+    for (const row of rows) {
+      if (row.hidden) continue
+      // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+      const { reserved, term } = await reservedNames.screen(row.name)
+      if (!reserved) continue
+      // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+      await moderationDb.setHidden(row.id, { hidden: true, reason: 'reserved_name', term })
+      hidden += 1
+      log.warn('team hidden by a re-screen: the reserved terms changed', { id: row.id, name: row.name, term })
+    }
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.error('re-screening failed', { message: err.message })
+  }
+  return hidden
+}
+
+// ── The three gated actions ────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * Apply a gated action, or file it for approval.
+ *
+ * The role check is answered LIVE against the database on every request by core's
+ * admin middleware, so "is this caller an admin" is not read from a token claim
+ * that a demotion would not have invalidated.
+ */
+async function requestOrApply({ req, actor, teamId, action, payload, reason }) {
+  if (!GATED_ACTIONS.includes(action)) throw new Error(`not a gated action: "${action}"`)
+  const team = await teamsDb.findById(teamId)
+  if (!team) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'team not found' }
+
+  if (!isAdmin(actor)) {
+    const id = await moderationDb.insertRequest({
+      teamId, action, payload, reason, requestedBy: actor.id, requestedUsername: actor.username,
+    })
+    await activity.log({
+      req,
+      action: 'team.moderation.request',
+      detail: `${actor.username} (#${actor.id}) requested "${action}" on team "${team.name}" (#${teamId})`
+        + `${reason ? `: "${reason}"` : ''}`,
+    })
+    return { ok: true, pending: true, requestId: id }
+  }
+
+  await applyAction({ req, actor, team, action, payload, reason })
+  return { ok: true, pending: false }
+}
+
+/** The effect itself. Reached by an admin directly, or by an approval. */
+async function applyAction({ req, actor, team, action, payload, reason }) {
+  switch (action) {
+    case 'unhide':
+      await moderationDb.setHidden(team.id, { hidden: false })
+      // A human has now ruled on this name, so no later sweep re-hides it.
+      await moderationDb.markNameReviewed(team.id)
+      break
+    case 'display_name_override':
+      await moderationDb.setDisplayNameOverride(team.id, payload.displayName)
+      await moderationDb.markNameReviewed(team.id)
+      break
+    case 'clear_display_name_override':
+      await moderationDb.setDisplayNameOverride(team.id, null)
+      break
+    default:
+      throw new Error(`not a gated action: "${action}"`)
+  }
+
+  await activity.log({
+    req,
+    action: `team.${action}`,
+    detail: `${actor.username} (#${actor.id}) applied "${action}" to team "${team.name}" (#${team.id})`
+      + `${payload && payload.displayName ? ` as "${payload.displayName}"` : ''}`
+      + `${reason ? `: "${reason}"` : ''}`,
+  })
+}
+
+/**
+ * Hide a Team. NOT gated — suppression is always safe (§2.11).
+ *
+ * The asymmetry is the whole design: publishing untrusted data needs a second
+ * pair of eyes, and withdrawing it needs to be possible at once, by whoever is
+ * on duty.
+ */
+async function hide({ req, actor, teamId, reason }) {
+  const team = await teamsDb.findById(teamId)
+  if (!team) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'team not found' }
+  await moderationDb.setHidden(teamId, { hidden: true, reason: 'staff' })
+  await activity.log({
+    req,
+    action: 'team.hide',
+    detail: `${actor.username} (#${actor.id}) hid team "${team.name}" (#${teamId})`
+      + `${reason ? `: "${reason}"` : ''}`,
+  })
+  return { ok: true }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Decide a pending request. Admin only.
+ *
+ * The effect is applied only when the row actually moved out of `pending`, so two
+ * admins deciding the same request race safely: the second is told it was already
+ * decided rather than applying the action a second time.
+ */
+async function decide({ req, actor, requestId, status, note }) {
+  if (!isAdmin(actor)) return { ok: false, status: 403, error: 'only an admin may decide a request' }
+  if (!['approved', 'rejected'].includes(status)) {
+    return { ok: false, status: 400, error: 'status must be approved or rejected' }
+  }
+
+  const request = await moderationDb.findRequest(requestId)
+  if (!request) return { ok: false, status: 404, error: 'request not found' }
+  if (request.status !== 'pending') {
+    return { ok: false, status: 409, error: `request is already ${request.status}` }
+  }
+
+  const moved = await moderationDb.decideRequest(requestId, {
+    status, decidedBy: actor.id, decidedUsername: actor.username, note,
+  })
+  if (!moved) return { ok: false, status: 409, error: 'request was decided by someone else' }
+
+  const team = await teamsDb.findById(request.team_id)
+  if (status === 'approved' && team) {
+    await applyAction({
+      req,
+      actor,
+      team,
+      action: request.action,
+      payload: parsePayload(request.payload),
+      reason: request.reason,
+    })
+  }
+
+  await activity.log({
+    req,
+    action: `team.moderation.${status}`,
+    detail: `${actor.username} (#${actor.id}) ${status} request #${requestId} `
+      + `("${request.action}" on team #${request.team_id}, asked by ${request.requested_username || 'a deleted user'})`
+      + `${note ? `: "${note}"` : ''}`,
+  })
+  return { ok: true, applied: status === 'approved' }
+}
+
+// The driver returns JSON columns already parsed on some versions and as a string
+// on others, so this normalises rather than assuming either.
+function parsePayload(payload) {
+  if (payload == null) return {}
+  if (typeof payload === 'object') return payload
+  try {
+    return JSON.parse(payload)
+  } catch {
+    return {}
+  }
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  screenForCreate,
+  rescreen,
+  requestOrApply,
+  hide,
+  decide,
+  reviewQueue: moderationDb.reviewQueue,
+  listRequests: moderationDb.listRequests,
+  pendingForTeam: moderationDb.pendingForTeam,
+  GATED_ACTIONS,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamNotify.db.js

@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
+// SQL for Team notification recipients and per-Team preferences (TEAMS.md Part 6).
+//
+// **The recipient set is the whole of Team scoping.** The four `team.*` streams
+// are global and carry no Team in their id; who an event reaches is decided here.
+// That is §6.2's design and it is not an optimisation — the push catalog is a
+// static registration validated at boot, so a stream per Team is unexpressible,
+// and stream ids live in `notification_subscriptions` rows that a per-Team id
+// would leave behind every time a Team archived.
+//
+// **One recipient query serves all four streams**, because the two populations in
+// §6.2's table are the same set written twice: "active members with a user_id,
+// plus active forum grants" IS "everyone with resolved forum access", by the
+// definition of teamAccess.forumAccess() (membership OR grant). What differs
+// between the streams is only who is subtracted — the author of the post that
+// caused it — and that is a caller's argument, not a second query.
+//
+// **Mutes are subtracted in SQL, not in the caller.** A recipient list that came
+// back complete and was filtered afterwards would be one refactor away from being
+// used unfiltered; there is no function here that returns an unmuted set.
+
+const { query } = require('../../utils/db')
+
+// The union, as a derived table both recipient functions build on. Written once
+// so that "who is in a Team for notification purposes" has exactly one definition.
+//
+// `status = 'active'` on the membership half and `revoked_at IS NULL` on the
+// grant half are the same two conditions the access resolver uses; a departed
+// member and a revoked guest are both people who could still be read a private
+// forum by a query that forgot one.
+const RECIPIENT_UNION = `
+  SELECT user_id FROM team_members
+   WHERE team_id = ? AND status = 'active' AND user_id IS NOT NULL
+  UNION
+  SELECT user_id FROM team_forum_grants
+   WHERE team_id = ? AND revoked_at IS NULL`
+
+// `Number.isInteger` alone is not enough: `Number(null)` is 0 and 0 is an
+// integer, so a null slipping into a caller's list would become user id 0 and
+// ride into an IN clause. No row has id 0, so it is harmless today — which is
+// exactly why it would never be noticed.
+const isUserId = (n) => Number.isInteger(n) && n > 0
+
+/**
+ * Every user id that may be notified about `teamId`, mutes already removed.
+ *
+ * `exclude` is the author of the thing that happened. Passed rather than removed
+ * afterwards for the reason in the header, and taken as a list because a caller
+ * with nobody to exclude should not have to invent a sentinel.
+ */
+async function recipientIds(teamId, { exclude = [] } = {}) {
+  const skip = [...new Set(exclude.map(Number).filter(isUserId))]
+  const notMe = skip.length ? `AND r.user_id NOT IN (${skip.map(() => '?').join(',')})` : ''
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT DISTINCT r.user_id
+       FROM (${RECIPIENT_UNION}) r
+       LEFT JOIN team_notification_prefs p ON p.user_id = r.user_id AND p.team_id = ?
+      WHERE COALESCE(p.muted, 0) = 0 ${notMe}`,
+    [teamId, teamId, teamId, ...skip],
+  )
+  return rows.map((r) => Number(r.user_id))
+}
+
+/**
+ * The same set, narrowed to those reachable by EMAIL and carrying each one's mode.
+ *
+ * A separate query rather than a join onto `recipientIds` because email has two
+ * conditions push does not: an address to send to, and an account still allowed to
+ * have one. A banned or disabled account keeps its forum grant in the ledger —
+ * revoking it is a separate staff decision — but must not keep receiving the
+ * Team's private discussion in its inbox.
+ *
+ * `email_mode` is COALESCEd to the column default rather than read as NULL — and
+ * that default is `'off'`, so this query returns the whole set with most of it
+ * marked as not wanting mail. Filtering to a mode is the CALLER's job, because
+ * `immediate` and `digest` are consumed by two different senders.
+ */
+async function emailRecipients(teamId, { exclude = [] } = {}) {
+  const skip = [...new Set(exclude.map(Number).filter(isUserId))]
+  const notMe = skip.length ? `AND u.id NOT IN (${skip.map(() => '?').join(',')})` : ''
+  return query(
+    `SELECT u.id AS user_id, u.username, u.email,
+            COALESCE(p.email_mode, 'off') AS email_mode,
+            p.last_digest_at
+       FROM (${RECIPIENT_UNION}) r
+       JOIN users u ON u.id = r.user_id
+       LEFT JOIN team_notification_prefs p ON p.user_id = u.id AND p.team_id = ?
+      WHERE COALESCE(p.muted, 0) = 0
+        AND u.email IS NOT NULL AND u.email <> ''
+        AND u.status = 'active' ${notMe}
+      GROUP BY u.id, u.username, u.email, p.email_mode, p.last_digest_at`,
+    [teamId, teamId, teamId, ...skip],
+  )
+}
+
+// ── Preferences ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * One row per Team this user may be notified about, whether or not a preference
+ * has ever been written for it — the account screen has to offer a Team the user
+ * has never touched, and a list built from the prefs table alone would be empty
+ * for exactly the users who have configured nothing.
+ *
+ * Archived Teams appear only when a preference row exists for them, so a mute the
+ * user set does not vanish from the screen the moment a guild disbands, while a
+ * disbanded guild nobody configured does not linger on it forever.
+ */
+async function prefsForUser(userId) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT t.id AS team_id, t.slug, t.name, t.display_name_override, t.status AS team_status,
+            COALESCE(p.muted, 0) AS muted,
+            COALESCE(p.email_mode, 'off') AS email_mode
+       FROM teams t
+       LEFT JOIN team_notification_prefs p ON p.team_id = t.id AND p.user_id = ?
+      WHERE (
+              EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM team_members m
+                       WHERE m.team_id = t.id AND m.user_id = ? AND m.status = 'active')
+           OR EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM team_forum_grants g
+                       WHERE g.team_id = t.id AND g.user_id = ? AND g.revoked_at IS NULL)
+           OR p.user_id IS NOT NULL
+            )
+      ORDER BY t.status, t.name`,
+    [userId, userId, userId],
+  )
+}
+
+/** One Team's preference for one user, or undefined. Read by the mute toggle. */
+async function prefFor(userId, teamId) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT team_id, muted, email_mode, last_digest_at
+       FROM team_notification_prefs WHERE user_id = ? AND team_id = ?`,
+    [userId, teamId],
+  )
+  return rows[0]
+}
+
+/**
+ * Write one preference.
+ *
+ * An upsert that touches ONLY the columns it was given: the one-click unsubscribe
+ * writes `muted` and must not reset an `email_mode` the user chose, and the
+ * settings screen writes both. `last_digest_at` is never written here — it is the
+ * worker's column, and a preference change must not look like a delivery.
+ */
+async function setPref(userId, teamId, { muted, emailMode }) {
+  const sets = ['updated_at = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP']
+  if (muted != null) sets.push('muted = VALUES(muted)')
+  if (emailMode != null) sets.push('email_mode = VALUES(email_mode)')
+  await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_notification_prefs (user_id, team_id, muted, email_mode)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)
+     ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE ${sets.join(', ')}`,
+    [userId, teamId, muted ? 1 : 0, emailMode || 'off'],
+  )
+}
+
+/** Stamp a digest as delivered. The worker's column, and its only writer. */
+async function stampDigest(userId, teamId, at) {
+  await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_notification_prefs (user_id, team_id, last_digest_at)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?)
+     ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE last_digest_at = VALUES(last_digest_at)`,
+    [userId, teamId, at],
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * Active Teams that have had forum activity since `since` — the digest worker's
+ * driving query.
+ *
+ * Driven from ACTIVITY rather than from the prefs table, which is what makes the
+ * worker's cost proportional to what was WRITTEN rather than to how many people
+ * once opened a settings screen. A Team nobody posted in costs one row of this
+ * query and no recipient computation at all.
+ */
+async function teamsWithForumActivitySince(since) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT DISTINCT t.id, t.slug, t.name, t.display_name_override
+       FROM teams t
+       JOIN team_forum_threads th ON th.team_id = t.id
+       JOIN team_forum_posts po ON po.thread_id = th.id
+      WHERE t.status = 'active'
+        AND po.created_at > ?
+        AND po.status = 'visible'
+        AND th.status = 'visible'`,
+    [since],
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * The posts one digest covers: visible posts in visible threads, newer than the
+ * recipient's own `since`.
+ *
+ * Re-read at send time rather than accumulated at publish time. A queue of pending
+ * items would have to be garbage-collected, would replay a backlog after an outage,
+ * and — the reason that actually matters — could email a body a moderator hid in
+ * between. This query cannot: a hidden post is simply not in it.
+ */
+async function digestPostsSince(teamId, since, limit = 20) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT po.id, po.thread_id, po.body_html, po.created_at, po.author_username,
+            th.title, th.type
+       FROM team_forum_posts po
+       JOIN team_forum_threads th ON th.id = po.thread_id
+      WHERE th.team_id = ?
+        AND po.created_at > ?
+        AND po.status = 'visible'
+        AND th.status = 'visible'
+      ORDER BY po.created_at
+      LIMIT ?`,
+    [teamId, since, Number(limit)],
+  )
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  recipientIds,
+  emailRecipients,
+  prefsForUser,
+  prefFor,
+  setPref,
+  stampDigest,
+  teamsWithForumActivitySince,
+  digestPostsSince,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamNotify.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+// Per-Team notification preferences, and the recipient sets built from them
+// (TEAMS.md §6.2–§6.4, phase 6).
+//
+// **The absence of a row is the default, and the two sinks default OPPOSITE ways.**
+// Push is opt-out: a user in one Team must never have to configure anything to be
+// tickled about it, and the per-Team mute is how they stop. Email is opt-IN
+// (`email_mode` defaults to `'off'`, deviating from §6.4 on the org lead's call):
+// turning on Gmail in the admin panel must not start sending daily mail to every
+// member of every Team on the deployment.
+//
+// Both are read the same way — COALESCE to the column default, never treat a
+// missing row as "unknown" — so the asymmetry lives in ONE place, the schema, and
+// not in a condition anybody has to remember.
+//
+// **This file never decides who may READ a Team.** It asks the same two tables
+// teamAccess.forumAccess() asks, in one query, because a fan-out cannot afford a
+// round trip per recipient — but it asks them for the same answer. If the access
+// rule ever changes, both must; the SQL in teamNotify.db.js says so at the union
+// it builds on, and the test that matters is the one asserting a revoked guest
+// receives nothing.
+
+const db = require('./teamNotify.db')
+
+// Stored as an ENUM, restated here because a value arriving from a request body
+// must be checked against something in JavaScript before it reaches the column —
+// a bad value would otherwise be a 500 from the driver rather than a 400 from us.
+const EMAIL_MODES = ['off', 'digest', 'immediate']
+
+const isEmailMode = (v) => EMAIL_MODES.includes(v)
+
+function publicPref(row) {
+  return {
+    teamId: Number(row.team_id),
+    slug: row.slug,
+    // The same `display_name_override || name` rule every other Team surface
+    // uses (§2.8.3). A notification screen showing the raw name would show a name
+    // staff have deliberately replaced everywhere else.
+    name: row.display_name_override || row.name,
+    archived: row.team_status === 'archived',
+    muted: Boolean(Number(row.muted)),
+    emailMode: row.email_mode,
+  }
+}
+
+/** Every Team this user could be notified about, with its current preference. */
+async function listPrefs(userId) {
+  return (await db.prefsForUser(userId)).map(publicPref)
+}
+
+/** One Team's preference for one user, defaults applied. Never null. */
+async function prefFor(userId, teamId) {
+  const row = await db.prefFor(userId, teamId)
+  return {
+    teamId: Number(teamId),
+    muted: Boolean(row && Number(row.muted)),
+    emailMode: (row && row.email_mode) || 'off',
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Replace this user's whole set of Team preferences.
+ *
+ * PUT-the-whole-set, matching the existing subscription endpoint, and the
+ * Android gotcha carried forward from `docs/android/PLAN.md` §11 applies to the
+ * ROUTE rather than to this function: the array is required even when empty.
+ *
+ * **A preference may only be written for a Team the caller is actually in.** The
+ * ids are checked against `listPrefs`, not trusted from the body — otherwise any
+ * authenticated user could write a row naming any Team, which is a (small) write
+ * primitive into a table keyed by someone else's private membership. Unknown ids
+ * are dropped rather than 400'd: a Team the user left between loading the screen
+ * and saving it is an ordinary race, not a client bug.
+ */
+async function replacePrefs(userId, entries) {
+  const allowed = new Map((await listPrefs(userId)).map((p) => [p.teamId, p]))
+  const written = []
+  for (const entry of entries) {
+    const teamId = Number(entry && entry.teamId)
+    if (!allowed.has(teamId)) continue
+    const emailMode = isEmailMode(entry.emailMode) ? entry.emailMode : 'off'
+    // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+    await db.setPref(userId, teamId, { muted: Boolean(entry.muted), emailMode })
+    written.push(teamId)
+  }
+
+  // A Team the caller COULD have named and did not is returned to its defaults.
+  //
+  // Without this, "replace the whole set" was a lie the endpoint told: omitting an
+  // entry left the old preference standing, which made `teams: []` — the body the
+  // route requires precisely so that clearing everything is expressible — clear
+  // nothing at all.
+  //
+  // Reset rather than deleted, and the difference is `last_digest_at`. That column
+  // is the digest worker's state, not a preference; dropping the row with it would
+  // make every visit to the settings screen re-open a day-wide digest window and
+  // mail somebody a summary they already read.
+  for (const teamId of allowed.keys()) {
+    if (written.includes(teamId)) continue
+    // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+    await db.setPref(userId, teamId, { muted: false, emailMode: 'off' })
+  }
+
+  return { written, prefs: await listPrefs(userId) }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Mute one Team for one user — the one-click unsubscribe's only effect.
+ *
+ * Deliberately narrow. The unsubscribe link is reached without a session, so what
+ * it can do is what an attacker holding a leaked link can do: silence one Team's
+ * notifications for one account, visibly and reversibly on the account screen.
+ * It writes no other column, and there is no "unsubscribe from everything".
+ */
+async function mute(userId, teamId) {
+  await db.setPref(userId, teamId, { muted: true })
+}
+
+/** Un-mute, for the toggle's other half. */
+async function unmute(userId, teamId) {
+  await db.setPref(userId, teamId, { muted: false })
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  EMAIL_MODES,
+  isEmailMode,
+  listPrefs,
+  prefFor,
+  replacePrefs,
+  mute,
+  unmute,
+  // Recipient sets, passed through so callers depend on the model rather than on
+  // the SQL. The fan-out in utils/teamNotify.js and the digest worker are the only
+  // callers.
+  //
+  // Wrapped rather than re-exported (`recipientIds: db.recipientIds`), which is
+  // the obvious shorter form and is wrong: that captures the function OBJECT at
+  // require time, so the layer below can never be substituted afterwards — which
+  // makes the db layer untestable in isolation and, more to the point, means the
+  // model is not really the seam it claims to be. These resolve `db.x` at call
+  // time, so the boundary is real.
+  recipientIds: (teamId, opts) => db.recipientIds(teamId, opts),
+  emailRecipients: (teamId, opts) => db.emailRecipients(teamId, opts),
+  stampDigest: (userId, teamId, at) => db.stampDigest(userId, teamId, at),
+  teamsWithForumActivitySince: (since) => db.teamsWithForumActivitySince(since),
+  digestPostsSince: (teamId, since, limit) => db.digestPostsSince(teamId, since, limit),
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamProvider.js

@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
+// ── Calling the Team provider ──────────────────────────────────────────────
+//
+// The one place core asks a module a question and waits for the answer
+// (docs/website/TEAMS.md §2.3). Everything here exists to serve invariant 1:
+//
+//   **Module unavailability is staleness, never emptiness.**
+//
+// No Team subsystem may apply a destructive result derived from a failed,
+// timed-out or unanswered module call. This file is where "failed" is defined, and
+// it is deliberately generous about what counts: a rejected promise, a timeout, a
+// non-object, a missing `ok`, or a structurally malformed row all leave with the
+// same `{ ok: false }` the module would have sent deliberately.
+//
+// **There is no shape a failure can take that core reads as "zero teams".** That
+// is the whole argument for the envelope, and the reason the provider signature is
+// not the obvious `getTeams(): Team[]` — a bare array has exactly one such shape,
+// `[]`, and it is the one a module returns while its sidecar is still connecting.
+//
+// Nothing here touches the database. It calls the module and hands back a value
+// the reconciler can trust the SHAPE of; whether to ACT on it is §2.4's question.
+
+const registries = require('../../modules/registries')
+const log = require('../../utils/logger')('teams')
+
+// The budget from §2.3. A provider is answering from its own cache or its own
+// sidecar client, both of which have their own timeouts well inside this; a call
+// that reaches ten seconds is wedged, not slow.
+const CALL_TIMEOUT_MS = 10_000
+
+/** A uniform refusal. `reason` is for the operator, via team_sync_state. */
+const fail = (reason) => ({ ok: false, reason })
+
+/**
+ * Await `promise` with a timeout that cannot outlive the call.
+ *
+ * The timer is always cleared — including on the winning path — because an
+ * uncleared 10s timer holds the event loop open, which in a test run means the
+ * process hangs long after the assertions passed. The suite already learned this
+ * one from a mariadb pool (test/_setup.js).
+ *
+ * It is also `unref`ed, which covers the case clearing cannot: when the module's
+ * promise NEVER settles, the race stays pending and there is nothing to clear
+ * until the deadline fires. An unreffed timer still fires normally while the
+ * process is alive — the server's own listener is what keeps it alive — but it no
+ * longer holds a shutdown open for ten seconds waiting on a module that is not
+ * going to answer.
+ */
+function withTimeout(promise, ms) {
+  let timer
+  const timeout = new Promise((resolve) => {
+    timer = setTimeout(() => resolve(fail(`provider did not answer within ${ms}ms`)), ms)
+    if (typeof timer.unref === 'function') timer.unref()
+  })
+  return Promise.race([promise, timeout]).finally(() => clearTimeout(timer))
+}
+
+/**
+ * Call one provider method and normalise whatever comes back into an envelope.
+ *
+ * `normalise` is only ever run on an `ok` answer, and may itself return a refusal
+ * — a structurally malformed row is treated as a failed call rather than as data
+ * to salvage. Salvaging is the dangerous option: dropping one unreadable member
+ * from a roster is indistinguishable, downstream, from that member having left,
+ * and the sync would mark them departed. Refusing costs one stale interval.
+ */
+async function call(method, normalise, ...args) {
+  const provider = registries.registeredTeamProvider()
+  if (!provider) return fail('no team provider is registered')
+
+  let answer
+  try {
+    answer = await withTimeout(Promise.resolve().then(() => provider[method](...args)), CALL_TIMEOUT_MS)
+  } catch (err) {
+    // A rejected promise is a module that threw, which is exactly as
+    // unauthoritative as one that answered `{ ok: false }`.
+    return fail(`${method}() threw: ${err.message}`)
+  }
+
+  if (!answer || typeof answer !== 'object' || Array.isArray(answer)) {
+    return fail(`${method}() returned ${Array.isArray(answer) ? 'an array' : typeof answer}, not an envelope`)
+  }
+  // `ok` must be present and true. A module that forgot the field is not one
+  // asserting authority, and reading a missing field as truthy would put the
+  // single most consequential decision in this file on a typo.
+  if (answer.ok !== true) return fail(answer.reason || `${method}() answered not-ok`)
+
+  const normalised = normalise(answer)
+  if (normalised.ok === false) {
+    log.warn('team provider answered with a malformed payload', {
+      owner: provider.owner, method, reason: normalised.reason,
+    })
+  }
+  return normalised
+}
+
+// `complete` defaults to TRUE when the module omits it, matching §2.3: the
+// envelope's optional field marks a partial answer, so its absence is the
+// ordinary authoritative case. A module that cannot enumerate exhaustively says
+// so explicitly.
+const isComplete = (answer) => answer.complete !== false
+
+const str = (v) => (typeof v === 'string' ? v.trim() : '')
+
+/** `{ ok, complete, teams: [{ externalId, name, abbr, meta }] }` */
+function normaliseTeams(answer) {
+  if (!Array.isArray(answer.teams)) return fail('getTeams() answered ok with no teams array')
+  const teams = []
+  for (const raw of answer.teams) {
+    const externalId = str(raw && raw.externalId)
+    const name = str(raw && raw.name)
+    // Both are load-bearing and neither has a safe default: externalId is the
+    // identity the whole rename rule (§2.2) turns on, and a Team with no name has
+    // no slug and no page.
+    if (!externalId) return fail('a team in getTeams() has no externalId')
+    if (!name) return fail(`team "${externalId}" has no name`)
+    teams.push({
+      externalId,
+      name,
+      abbr: str(raw.abbr) || null,
+      // Opaque by contract (§10.5) — stored and handed back, never branched on.
+      meta: raw.meta && typeof raw.meta === 'object' ? raw.meta : null,
+    })
+  }
+  return { ok: true, complete: isComplete(answer), teams }
+}
+
+/** `{ ok, complete, members: [{ memberKey, displayName, rankLabel, leader, online, userId }] }` */
+function normaliseMembers(answer) {
+  if (!Array.isArray(answer.members)) return fail('getTeamMembers() answered ok with no members array')
+  const members = []
+  const seen = new Set()
+  for (const raw of answer.members) {
+    const memberKey = str(raw && raw.memberKey)
+    if (!memberKey) return fail('a member has no memberKey')
+    // A duplicate key would upsert twice and inflate no count but confuse every
+    // reader; it also means the module's own identity rule is broken, which is
+    // worth surfacing rather than quietly collapsing.
+    if (seen.has(memberKey)) return fail(`member "${memberKey}" appears twice`)
+    seen.add(memberKey)
+    members.push({
+      memberKey,
+      displayName: str(raw.displayName) || null,
+      rankLabel: str(raw.rankLabel) || null,
+      leader: Boolean(raw.leader),
+      online: Boolean(raw.online),
+      // Resolved BY THE MODULE — it owns the game↔site link table (§2.3). Core
+      // takes the number and never looks it up.
+      userId: Number.isInteger(raw.userId) && raw.userId > 0 ? raw.userId : null,
+    })
+  }
+  return { ok: true, complete: isComplete(answer), members }
+}
+
+/** `{ ok, leaders: [memberKey] }` */
+function normaliseLeaders(answer) {
+  if (!Array.isArray(answer.leaders)) return fail('getTeamLeaders() answered ok with no leaders array')
+  const leaders = []
+  for (const raw of answer.leaders) {
+    const key = str(raw)
+    if (!key) return fail('a leader entry is not a member key')
+    if (!leaders.includes(key)) leaders.push(key)
+  }
+  return { ok: true, leaders }
+}
+
+/**
+ * `{ ok, members: [memberKey] }` — WHICH rows the module permits this viewer.
+ *
+ * Deliberately a set of keys rather than a set of rows. Core already holds the
+ * rows and knows their public shape; asking the module for rows back would let a
+ * module widen what is published — re-adding a `userId` or a `memberKey` that
+ * §3.2 says is never published — and core's field guarantee would then rest on
+ * every module's good behaviour rather than on core. So the module answers the
+ * question it actually owns (who may be seen at this rung) and core keeps the
+ * question it owns (what a member row looks like in public).
+ */
+function normaliseVisibleKeys(answer) {
+  if (!Array.isArray(answer.members)) return fail('projectRoster() answered ok with no members array')
+  const keys = []
+  for (const raw of answer.members) {
+    const key = str(raw)
+    if (!key) return fail('a projectRoster() entry is not a member key')
+    if (!keys.includes(key)) keys.push(key)
+  }
+  return { ok: true, members: keys }
+}
+
+const getTeams = () => call('getTeams', normaliseTeams)
+const getTeamMembers = (externalId) => call('getTeamMembers', normaliseMembers, externalId)
+const getTeamLeaders = (externalId) => call('getTeamLeaders', normaliseLeaders, externalId)
+
+/**
+ * Ask the module which roster rows this viewer may see (§3.3).
+ *
+ * The per-audience projection is the module's because the visibility framework
+ * and its rung configuration are module-owned (§10.5) — core does not know what a
+ * rung is. Core supplies the roster and a description of the viewer; the module
+ * returns the member keys it permits.
+ *
+ * **"No audience model" and "could not answer" are different, and the caller must
+ * be able to tell them apart** — so the refusal carries `projects`.
+ *
+ *   `projects: false` — no provider is registered, or the registered one does not
+ *     implement `projectRoster`. There is no rung system to consult and nothing
+ *     is being withheld; the roster is served at core's public shape. This is why
+ *     the member is OPTIONAL: bare core, and a module with no audience model of
+ *     its own, both render exactly the page core writes.
+ *
+ *   `projects: true` — the module HAS an audience model and core could not reach
+ *     it (refused, threw, timed out, answered malformed). Here the caller must
+ *     fail CLOSED, because "leave it alone" would mean publishing the very rows
+ *     the rungs exist to withhold. This is the one place in the Team subsystem
+ *     where unavailability is not staleness: everywhere else a refused call
+ *     leaves data alone, and doing that to a *visibility* question is a leak.
+ */
+async function projectRoster(externalId, members, viewer) {
+  const provider = registries.registeredTeamProvider()
+  if (!provider) return { ...fail('no team provider is registered'), projects: false }
+  if (typeof provider.projectRoster !== 'function') {
+    return { ...fail('provider does not project rosters'), projects: false }
+  }
+  const answer = await call('projectRoster', normaliseVisibleKeys, externalId, members, viewer)
+  return answer.ok ? answer : { ...answer, projects: true }
+}
+
+/** Which module is authoritative, or null. The reconciler keys sync state on it. */
+const providerModuleId = () => {
+  const provider = registries.registeredTeamProvider()
+  return provider ? provider.owner : null
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  getTeams,
+  getTeamMembers,
+  getTeamLeaders,
+  projectRoster,
+  providerModuleId,
+  CALL_TIMEOUT_MS,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamSlug.js

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+// Deriving a Team's URL slug from a game-written name (TEAMS.md §2.1).
+//
+// A slug is derived ONCE, at create, and then frozen for the life of the row —
+// like `name`, and for the same reason: the Team page URL has to stay stable, and
+// a rename is an archive plus a create rather than an edit.
+
+const MAX_SLUG = 180 // the column is 191; leaves room for a -NN suffix
+
+/**
+ * Reduce a name to a URL-safe stem.
+ *
+ * Diacritics are folded rather than stripped so "Ünderdark" becomes "underdark"
+ * and not "nderdark". A name made entirely of characters that do not survive —
+ * which a guild name genuinely can be, since the game accepts far more than a URL
+ * does — leaves an empty stem, and the caller substitutes a stable fallback
+ * rather than minting a Team with no address.
+ */
+function slugify(name) {
+  return String(name || '')
+    .normalize('NFKD')
+    .replace(/[̀-ͯ]/g, '')
+    .toLowerCase()
+    .replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-')
+    .replace(/^-+|-+$/g, '')
+    .slice(0, MAX_SLUG)
+    .replace(/-+$/g, '')
+}
+
+/**
+ * A slug not already taken, given the ones that are.
+ *
+ * `taken` must include ARCHIVED teams' slugs, not only active ones. The unique
+ * key constrains active rows alone, so the database would allow a new Team to
+ * take a retired Team's slug — and §2.2 promises the retired one stays readable
+ * at that address, which is what a bookmark or an old Discord link resolves to.
+ */
+function uniqueSlug(name, taken, { fallback = 'team' } = {}) {
+  const base = slugify(name) || fallback
+  const used = new Set(taken)
+  if (!used.has(base)) return base
+  // Bounded rather than unbounded: a suffix search that cannot terminate is worse
+  // than a slug with an id in it, and 999 same-named teams is already absurd.
+  for (let n = 2; n <= 999; n++) {
+    const candidate = `${base}-${n}`
+    if (!used.has(candidate)) return candidate
+  }
+  return `${base}-${Date.now().toString(36)}`
+}
+
+module.exports = { slugify, uniqueSlug, MAX_SLUG }

server/src/model/teams/teamSync.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,624 @@
+// ── The reconciler ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+//
+// Core's projection of the module's Teams, kept in step (TEAMS.md §2.4). This is
+// the only thing that writes `team_members`, and one of only two things that
+// write `teams.status`.
+//
+// **The four places it refuses to act** are the point of the file, and they are
+// all one rule stated four ways: *a result derived from an answer core does not
+// trust is never applied.* Anything less specific tends to collapse, under
+// maintenance, into "a failed call means no teams" — which is invariant 1's
+// failure mode and would empty every roster on the site the first time a sidecar
+// restarted.
+//
+//   1. `getTeams()` not ok            → write sync state, touch NOTHING, return.
+//   2. ok but empty, core holds ≥1    → quarantine; apply only if the NEXT
+//                                       authoritative answer agrees.
+//   3. `getTeamMembers()` not ok      → that Team's roster untouched and stale;
+//                                       the other Teams carry on.
+//   4. ok but zero members, had some  → the same two-strikes quarantine, per Team.
+//
+// Gates 2 and 4 exist because an authoritative-looking empty answer during a cold
+// start is the one failure indistinguishable from a real wipe. "Every Team on the
+// shard disbanded at once" costs one interval of delay to confirm; getting it
+// wrong costs every roster on the site.
+//
+// Events (§2.3) are an OPTIMISATION, never the source of truth. They make the
+// common case immediate; reconciliation is what makes it correct. Nothing
+// destructive at Team level is ever driven by one — §2.2 scopes archival to an
+// authoritative full list, so a `team.disbanded` event schedules a run rather
+// than archiving, and a spurious event costs a reconcile instead of a Team.
+
+const teamsDb = require('./teams.db')
+const teamProvider = require('./teamProvider')
+const moderation = require('./teamModeration.model')
+const activity = require('./teamActivity.model')
+const teamNotify = require('../../utils/teamNotify')
+const teamVoiceSync = require('../../utils/teamVoiceSync')
+const { slugify, uniqueSlug } = require('./teamSlug')
+const settings = require('../settings/settings.model')
+const log = require('../../utils/logger')('teams')
+
+// At most one run per 30s (§2.4), so a sidecar flapping cannot become a
+// reconciliation storm — every flap publishes events, and every event asks for a
+// run.
+const DEBOUNCE_MS = 30_000
+const DEFAULT_INTERVAL_S = 900
+const MIN_INTERVAL_S = 60
+const INTERVAL_KEY = 'teams_reconcile_interval_s'
+
+// The six kinds a module may publish (§2.3). Six rather than the four a
+// membership-shaped reading suggests, because leadership is its own authority
+// path and a leadership change must be expressible without pretending someone
+// joined or left.
+const EVENT_KINDS = new Set([
+  'team.created', 'team.disbanded',
+  'team.member.added', 'team.member.removed',
+  'team.leader.added', 'team.leader.removed',
+])
+
+// Kinds that can only be answered by a full list. `team.created` cannot be
+// applied from a delta — a Team built from one has no name, no roster and no
+// leaders — and `team.disbanded` must not be, per §2.2.
+const RECONCILE_ONLY = new Set(['team.created', 'team.disbanded'])
+
+// ── Scheduling state (in-process; one provider per deployment) ─────────────
+
+let running = false
+let rerunReason = null
+let lastRunAt = 0
+let debounceTimer = null
+let pollTimer = null
+let started = false
+
+/** Resolve the poll interval, floored so a bad setting cannot become a hot loop. */
+async function intervalSeconds() {
+  let raw
+  try {
+    raw = await settings.get(INTERVAL_KEY)
+  } catch {
+    return DEFAULT_INTERVAL_S
+  }
+  const n = Number.parseInt(raw, 10)
+  if (!Number.isFinite(n) || n < MIN_INTERVAL_S) return DEFAULT_INTERVAL_S
+  return n
+}
+
+/**
+ * Backoff, capped at the poll interval (§2.4).
+ *
+ * The cap is what keeps this a backoff rather than an outage: a module down for a
+ * day would otherwise reach a delay measured in weeks and stay stale long after
+ * it recovered.
+ */
+function backoffSeconds(consecutiveFailures, intervalS) {
+  if (!consecutiveFailures) return intervalS
+  return Math.min(intervalS, 2 ** Math.min(consecutiveFailures, 16) * 15)
+}
+
+// ── Applying one Team ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * Create the row for a Team core has not seen, deriving its slug and screening
+ * its name against the reserved list (§2.8).
+ *
+ * The row is created whatever the screening says, and hidden if it matched. Core
+ * cannot refuse a name: the guild already exists in the game and core is a mirror
+ * of it, not an authority over it. A hidden Team is absent from public surfaces
+ * and completely functional for its own members — the people in it are not being
+ * punished for a name their leader chose.
+ */
+async function createTeam(moduleId, team) {
+  const taken = await teamsDb.slugsLike(slugify(team.name) || 'team')
+  const slug = uniqueSlug(team.name, taken)
+  const screened = await moderation.screenForCreate(team.name)
+  const id = await teamsDb.insertTeam({ moduleId, slug, ...team, ...screened })
+  log.info('team created', {
+    moduleId, externalId: team.externalId, name: team.name, slug, hidden: Boolean(screened.hidden),
+  })
+  return id
+}
+
+/**
+ * The §2.2 rename rule: same id and a different name is an archive plus a create.
+ *
+ * The old row keeps its forum, its activity and its grants, all read-only, and
+ * points at its successor so the old slug can explain itself instead of 404ing.
+ * Core never decides whether this is "really" the same team — that judgement is
+ * the module's, expressed in whether it reuses the external id (§10.5).
+ */
+async function applyRename(moduleId, existing, team) {
+  const successorId = await createTeam(moduleId, team)
+  await teamsDb.archiveTeam(existing.id, 'renamed', successorId)
+  log.info('team renamed; previous row archived', {
+    externalId: team.externalId, from: existing.name, to: team.name, archivedId: existing.id, successorId,
+  })
+  // §4.2's `core.team.renamed`, written to the SUCCESSOR rather than to the row
+  // that was renamed: the archived row is a read-only record of what happened
+  // before the rename (§2.2), and the person who wants to know a Team used to be
+  // called something else is looking at the live page.
+  //
+  // The old name is core's own, not game-sourced text a module handed us this
+  // run — it is the `name` column core has been serving all along — so §2.9's
+  // approval gate does not apply. It can still be a name staff suppressed, which
+  // is why a hidden Team's feed is not served publicly (teamActivity.feedFor).
+  await activity.logCore({
+    teamId: successorId,
+    kind: activity.CORE_KINDS.TEAM_RENAMED,
+    summary: `Renamed from ${existing.display_name_override || existing.name}`,
+    dedupeKey: `renamed:${existing.id}`,
+  }).catch((err) => log.warn('rename activity not recorded', { message: err.message }))
+  return successorId
+}
+
+/** Never a game-internal member key on a public page: that identifier is not published (§3.2). */
+const memberLabel = (row) => (row && row.display_name) || 'A member'
+
+/**
+ * Core's own membership items for one roster run (§4.2).
+ *
+ * **Suppressed on a Team's FIRST roster.** Importing a 155-member guild is one
+ * Team arriving, not 155 people joining, and emitting a join per member would
+ * bury every real event under the import and blow through the row cap on day one.
+ * `roster_synced_at IS NULL` is exactly "core has never held a roster for this
+ * Team", so the same condition covers a newly created Team and a newly installed
+ * module adopting an existing one.
+ *
+ * Never throws: the feed is a rendering of the sync, and a feed write failing
+ * must not abort the sync that is the actual source of truth.
+ */
+async function logRosterActivity(team, { joined, left, promoted, demoted }) {
+  if (!team.roster_synced_at) return
+
+  const items = [
+    ...joined.map((row) => ({ kind: activity.CORE_KINDS.MEMBER_JOINED, row, verb: 'joined' })),
+    ...left.map((row) => ({ kind: activity.CORE_KINDS.MEMBER_LEFT, row, verb: 'left' })),
+    ...promoted.map((row) => ({ kind: activity.CORE_KINDS.LEADER_CHANGED, row, verb: 'became a leader' })),
+    ...demoted.map((row) => ({ kind: activity.CORE_KINDS.LEADER_CHANGED, row, verb: 'stepped down as a leader' })),
+  ]
+
+  for (const { kind, row, verb } of items) {
+    try {
+      // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+      await activity.logCore({
+        teamId: team.id,
+        kind,
+        summary: `${memberLabel(row)} ${verb}`,
+        actorMemberKey: row.member_key,
+        actorUserId: row.user_id ?? null,
+      })
+    } catch (err) {
+      log.warn('roster activity not recorded', { teamId: team.id, kind, message: err.message })
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The push half of the same roster run (TEAMS.md §6.2, phase 6).
+ *
+ * **At most one tickle per stream per run, not one per member.** A tickle is
+ * content-free — it says "something happened in this Team" and the app pulls the
+ * rest — so five people joining in one sweep is five identical notifications and
+ * one piece of information. The feed above is per-member because it is a record;
+ * this is per-run because it is a nudge.
+ *
+ * **Suppressed on a Team's FIRST roster, exactly as the feed is**, and this is the
+ * half where it matters more: importing a 155-member guild would otherwise wake
+ * every one of their phones. `roster_synced_at IS NULL` is the same condition, read
+ * from the same row before the same stamp moves.
+ *
+ * Never throws — the fan-out swallows its own failures, and this adds the guard
+ * for anything the surrounding read could raise. A roster sync is the source of
+ * truth; a notification about it is not.
+ */
+async function notifyRoster(team, { joined, promoted, demoted }) {
+  if (!team.roster_synced_at) return
+  try {
+    // The count rides along for the Discord bridge (§7.2), which has no app on
+    // the other end to pull the roster after a content-free nudge. The tickle
+    // itself is unchanged and still carries nothing.
+    if (joined.length > 0) await teamNotify.memberJoined(team, { count: joined.length })
+    if (promoted.length > 0 || demoted.length > 0) await teamNotify.leadershipChanged(team)
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.warn('roster notification not sent', { teamId: team.id, message: err.message })
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Sync one Team's roster and leadership. Gates 3 and 4 live here.
+ *
+ * Returns whether the roster was applied, so the caller can tell "synced" from
+ * "left alone", which is the difference between fresh and stale on that Team's
+ * page.
+ */
+async function syncRoster(team) {
+  const answer = await teamProvider.getTeamMembers(team.external_id)
+
+  // Gate 3. One Team's unanswerable roster is not the other Teams' problem, and
+  // it is certainly not an empty roster.
+  if (!answer.ok) {
+    log.warn('roster left untouched; provider could not answer', {
+      externalId: team.external_id, reason: answer.reason,
+    })
+    return false
+  }
+
+  // The full rows rather than just the keys: the activity feed needs the display
+  // name and the prior `is_leader` of everyone who is about to change, and both
+  // are gone once the upsert below has run. One read either way — this replaces
+  // the `memberKeys` call rather than adding to it.
+  const knownRows = await teamsDb.membersByTeam(team.id)
+  const knownByKey = new Map(knownRows.map((row) => [row.member_key, row]))
+  const known = knownRows.map((row) => row.member_key)
+
+  // Gate 4, the per-Team twin of gate 2.
+  if (answer.complete && answer.members.length === 0 && known.length > 0) {
+    if (!team.members_empty_since) {
+      await teamsDb.setMembersEmptySince(team.id, new Date())
+      log.warn('empty roster quarantined; awaiting a second answer', {
+        externalId: team.external_id, had: known.length,
+      })
+      return false
+    }
+    log.warn('empty roster confirmed by a second answer; departing every member', {
+      externalId: team.external_id, had: known.length,
+    })
+  } else if (team.members_empty_since) {
+    // Any non-empty answer clears the quarantine.
+    await teamsDb.setMembersEmptySince(team.id, null)
+  }
+
+  for (const member of answer.members) {
+    // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+    await teamsDb.upsertMember({
+      teamId: team.id,
+      memberKey: member.memberKey,
+      displayName: member.displayName,
+      userId: member.userId,
+      isLeader: member.leader,
+      rankLabel: member.rankLabel,
+      online: member.online,
+    })
+  }
+
+  // Anyone the module reports that core was not already holding. Read from the
+  // module's shape, since a joiner has no row yet.
+  const joined = answer.members
+    .filter((m) => !knownByKey.has(m.memberKey))
+    .map((m) => ({ member_key: m.memberKey, display_name: m.displayName, user_id: m.userId }))
+
+  // Removals only from a COMPLETE answer. `complete: false` means "valid but
+  // partial", so additions and updates apply and nothing is taken away.
+  let left = []
+  if (answer.complete) {
+    const seen = new Set(answer.members.map((m) => m.memberKey))
+    const departedKeys = known.filter((key) => !seen.has(key))
+    left = departedKeys.map((key) => knownByKey.get(key))
+    await teamsDb.markDeparted(team.id, departedKeys)
+  }
+
+  // Leadership is a separate question with a separate answer, and a provider that
+  // cannot answer it leaves the synced value alone rather than demoting everyone.
+  const leaders = await teamProvider.getTeamLeaders(team.external_id)
+  let promoted = []
+  let demoted = []
+  if (leaders.ok) {
+    // Diffed against the PRIOR rows, before setLeaders overwrites them. A member
+    // who joined this run as a leader is reported as joining, not as being
+    // promoted — they were never anything else here.
+    const nowLeader = new Set(leaders.leaders)
+    const departed = new Set(left.map((row) => row && row.member_key))
+    promoted = knownRows.filter((row) => nowLeader.has(row.member_key) && !row.is_leader)
+    demoted = knownRows.filter((row) => !nowLeader.has(row.member_key) && row.is_leader && !departed.has(row.member_key))
+    await teamsDb.setLeaders(team.id, leaders.leaders)
+  } else {
+    log.warn('leadership left untouched; provider could not answer', {
+      externalId: team.external_id, reason: leaders.reason,
+    })
+  }
+
+  await teamsDb.recount(team.id)
+  // Both read before `markRosterSynced` moves the stamp their first-roster
+  // suppression turns on.
+  await logRosterActivity(team, { joined, left: left.filter(Boolean), promoted, demoted })
+  await notifyRoster(team, { joined, promoted, demoted })
+  await teamsDb.markRosterSynced(team.id)
+  return true
+}
+
+// ── The run ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * One full reconciliation. Callers use `request()`; this is the body it guards.
+ *
+ * Never throws: a reconcile is a background job, and a rejection here would
+ * surface as an unhandled rejection in the poll timer rather than as anything an
+ * operator could act on. The failure is recorded where it can be read — in
+ * `team_sync_state`, which Admin → Teams shows verbatim.
+ */
+async function runOnce(reason) {
+  const moduleId = teamProvider.providerModuleId()
+  if (!moduleId) return { ok: false, reason: 'no team provider is registered' }
+
+  await teamsDb.recordAttempt(moduleId)
+  const answer = await teamProvider.getTeams()
+
+  // Gate 1.
+  if (!answer.ok) {
+    await teamsDb.recordFailure(moduleId, answer.reason)
+    log.warn('reconcile refused; provider could not answer', { reason: answer.reason, trigger: reason })
+    return { ok: false, reason: answer.reason }
+  }
+
+  const existing = await teamsDb.activeByModule(moduleId)
+
+  // Gate 2. Only a COMPLETE answer can mean "there are no teams" — a partial one
+  // removes nothing by definition.
+  if (answer.complete && answer.teams.length === 0 && existing.length > 0) {
+    const state = await teamsDb.syncState(moduleId)
+    if (!state || !state.pending_empty_since) {
+      await teamsDb.setPendingEmpty(moduleId, new Date())
+      await teamsDb.recordSuccess(moduleId)
+      log.warn('empty team list quarantined; awaiting a second answer', { held: existing.length })
+      return { ok: true, quarantined: true, applied: 0 }
+    }
+    const intervalS = await intervalSeconds()
+    const waited = (Date.now() - new Date(state.pending_empty_since).getTime()) / 1000
+    if (waited < intervalS) {
+      await teamsDb.recordSuccess(moduleId)
+      log.warn('empty team list still quarantined', { waitedSeconds: Math.round(waited), intervalS })
+      return { ok: true, quarantined: true, applied: 0 }
+    }
+    log.warn('empty team list confirmed; archiving every active team', { count: existing.length })
+  } else if (answer.teams.length) {
+    // Any non-empty answer clears the quarantine.
+    await teamsDb.setPendingEmpty(moduleId, null)
+  }
+
+  const byExternalId = new Map(existing.map((t) => [t.external_id, t]))
+  const seen = new Set()
+  let created = 0
+  let renamed = 0
+  let rosters = 0
+
+  for (const team of answer.teams) {
+    seen.add(team.externalId)
+    const current = byExternalId.get(team.externalId)
+    let id
+    if (!current) {
+      id = await createTeam(moduleId, team)
+      created += 1
+    } else if (current.name !== team.name) {
+      id = await applyRename(moduleId, current, team)
+      renamed += 1
+    } else {
+      id = current.id
+      await teamsDb.updateTeam(id, { abbr: team.abbr, meta: team.meta })
+    }
+
+    // Re-read rather than reusing `current`: a create or a rename has just made a
+    // row this loop has never seen, and syncRoster reads the quarantine stamp off
+    // it. Passing a stale object would drop the second strike of gate 4.
+    const row = await teamsDb.findById(id)
+    if (row && await syncRoster(row)) rosters += 1
+  }
+
+  // Archive what the module no longer lists — the §2.2 disband path, and the only
+  // one. Guarded by `complete` for the same reason removals are.
+  let archived = 0
+  if (answer.complete) {
+    for (const team of existing) {
+      if (seen.has(team.external_id)) continue
+      await teamsDb.archiveTeam(team.id, 'disbanded')
+      archived += 1
+      log.info('team archived; absent from an authoritative list', {
+        externalId: team.external_id, name: team.name,
+      })
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Re-screen the names no human has ruled on. Names are immutable per row, so
+  // this only changes an outcome when the reserved TERMS changed — an operator
+  // adding one, or the deployment being renamed — which is exactly the case a
+  // create-time-only check would miss forever.
+  const rehidden = await moderation.rescreen(moduleId)
+
+  await teamsDb.recordSuccess(moduleId)
+
+  // §7.3's "after a successful Team reconcile": the voice reconciler runs off the
+  // projection this run just refreshed. Requested rather than awaited — it makes
+  // Discord calls, and a roster sync must never be slowed down, failed or held
+  // open by an integration hanging off it. It has its own debounce and its own
+  // suspensions (including the stale check, which is why it re-reads the state
+  // this run just wrote rather than trusting that it was called from a good one).
+  teamVoiceSync.request({ reason: 'reconcile' })
+  log.info('reconcile complete', {
+    trigger: reason, created, renamed, archived, rosters, rehidden, total: answer.teams.length,
+  })
+  return { ok: true, created, renamed, archived, rosters, rehidden }
+}
+
+// ── The public entry points ────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * Run now, awaited, with the per-module lock held. Admin → Resync uses this,
+ * because an operator pressing a button is owed the outcome rather than a
+ * promise that something will happen soon.
+ *
+ * A run already in progress is JOINED rather than queued: the caller wants "the
+ * projection is now current", and a run that started a moment ago delivers that.
+ */
+async function reconcileNow(reason = 'manual') {
+  if (running) {
+    rerunReason = reason
+    return { ok: true, joined: true }
+  }
+  running = true
+  try {
+    const result = await runOnce(reason)
+    lastRunAt = Date.now()
+    return result
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.error('reconcile threw', { message: err.message, trigger: reason })
+    return { ok: false, reason: err.message }
+  } finally {
+    running = false
+    const queued = rerunReason
+    rerunReason = null
+    // Something asked while this run was in flight, so it saw state this run may
+    // have been too early to include. Ask again, through the debounce.
+    if (queued) request({ reason: queued })
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Ask for a reconciliation. Returns immediately and never rejects — this is what
+ * `ctx.teams.reconcile()` is (§2.3), and a module must not be able to make its
+ * own call site slow or its own errors someone else's.
+ */
+function request({ reason = 'module' } = {}) {
+  if (debounceTimer) return
+  const since = Date.now() - lastRunAt
+  if (running) {
+    rerunReason = reason
+    return
+  }
+  if (since >= DEBOUNCE_MS) {
+    reconcileNow(reason).catch(() => {})
+    return
+  }
+  debounceTimer = setTimeout(() => {
+    debounceTimer = null
+    reconcileNow(reason).catch(() => {})
+  }, DEBOUNCE_MS - since)
+  // Unreffed for the same reason the provider's deadline is: a pending debounce
+  // must not hold a shutdown open waiting to do background work.
+  if (typeof debounceTimer.unref === 'function') debounceTimer.unref()
+}
+
+/**
+ * Apply a module-published event (§2.3).
+ *
+ * Deltas are applied only for a Team core already knows, and only for the four
+ * kinds a delta can express. Everything else — an unknown Team, a create, a
+ * disband — asks for a reconciliation instead, because a Team invented from a
+ * delta has no name, no roster and no leaders, and an archive driven by one is
+ * destruction on the strength of a message that may simply have been repeated.
+ */
+async function publish(event) {
+  const { kind, externalId } = event || {}
+  if (!EVENT_KINDS.has(kind)) throw new Error(`teams.publish: unknown event kind "${kind}"`)
+  const id = typeof externalId === 'string' ? externalId.trim() : ''
+  if (!id) throw new Error(`teams.publish: ${kind} has no externalId`)
+
+  const moduleId = teamProvider.providerModuleId()
+  if (!moduleId) return
+
+  if (RECONCILE_ONLY.has(kind)) {
+    request({ reason: kind })
+    return
+  }
+
+  const team = await teamsDb.findActive(moduleId, id)
+  if (!team) {
+    request({ reason: `${kind} for an unknown team` })
+    return
+  }
+
+  const memberKey = typeof event.memberKey === 'string' ? event.memberKey.trim() : ''
+  if (!memberKey) throw new Error(`teams.publish: ${kind} has no memberKey`)
+
+  switch (kind) {
+    case 'team.member.added':
+      await teamsDb.upsertMember({
+        teamId: team.id,
+        memberKey,
+        displayName: typeof event.displayName === 'string' ? event.displayName.trim() : null,
+        userId: Number.isInteger(event.userId) && event.userId > 0 ? event.userId : null,
+        isLeader: Boolean(event.leader),
+        rankLabel: typeof event.rankLabel === 'string' ? event.rankLabel.trim() : null,
+        online: Boolean(event.online),
+      })
+      break
+    case 'team.member.removed':
+      await teamsDb.markDeparted(team.id, [memberKey])
+      break
+    case 'team.leader.added':
+    case 'team.leader.removed':
+      // A no-op when the member is unknown: the row is created by the roster, not
+      // by a leadership delta, and inventing one here would put a member on the
+      // roster whose only evidence is that someone promoted them.
+      await teamsDb.setMemberLeader(team.id, memberKey, kind === 'team.leader.added')
+      break
+    default:
+      break
+  }
+
+  await teamsDb.recount(team.id)
+  // A delta is a hint that something changed, not a claim to have applied all of
+  // it, so every one still asks for the run that makes it correct.
+  request({ reason: kind })
+}
+
+// ── The poll ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+async function scheduleNextPoll() {
+  const intervalS = await intervalSeconds()
+  const moduleId = teamProvider.providerModuleId()
+  let delayS = intervalS
+  if (moduleId) {
+    const state = await teamsDb.syncState(moduleId).catch(() => null)
+    if (state) delayS = backoffSeconds(state.consecutive_failures, intervalS)
+  }
+  pollTimer = setTimeout(() => {
+    reconcileNow('poll').catch(() => {}).then(() => { if (started) scheduleNextPoll().catch(() => {}) })
+  }, delayS * 1000)
+  if (typeof pollTimer.unref === 'function') pollTimer.unref()
+}
+
+/**
+ * Start the boot reconcile and the poll. Called from the module lifecycle, after
+ * every module has started — the website may have been down across a whole guild
+ * war, so the first thing it does on the way up is ask.
+ */
+async function start() {
+  if (started) return
+  started = true
+  if (!teamProvider.providerModuleId()) {
+    log.info('no team provider registered; the reconciler stays idle')
+    return
+  }
+  await reconcileNow('boot')
+  await scheduleNextPoll()
+}
+
+function stop() {
+  started = false
+  if (pollTimer) clearTimeout(pollTimer)
+  if (debounceTimer) clearTimeout(debounceTimer)
+  pollTimer = null
+  debounceTimer = null
+}
+
+// Test-only: the scheduler is module-level state, so a test that triggers a run
+// has to be able to put it back.
+function _reset() {
+  stop()
+  running = false
+  rerunReason = null
+  lastRunAt = 0
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  reconcileNow,
+  request,
+  publish,
+  start,
+  stop,
+  intervalSeconds,
+  backoffSeconds,
+  EVENT_KINDS,
+  DEBOUNCE_MS,
+  DEFAULT_INTERVAL_S,
+  _reset,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamVoice.db.js

@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+// SQL for per-Team external resources — today, the Discord voice channel
+// (TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9).
+//
+// Two queries carry the phase. `desiredTeams` is what SHOULD have a channel and
+// `holdersWithoutClaim` is what HAS one and should not; the reconciler is the
+// difference between them, and keeping both as single queries is what stops a
+// pass from being one round trip per Team before it has made a single Discord
+// call.
+//
+// **`discordSubjectsFor` is the whole identity chain in one statement** (§2.6):
+// team_members → users → user_identities. A member with no site account has no
+// row to join, and a member with a site account but no Discord identity drops out
+// at the second join — which is exactly right, because a role can only be granted
+// to somebody Discord knows about. Nothing else in the phase is allowed to
+// shortcut this with `teams.linked_count`, which counts hop 1 and is always the
+// larger number.
+
+const { query } = require('../../utils/db')
+
+// The provider id a Discord identity is stored under. Matches `auth_providers.id`
+// and the built-in provider in `auth/providers/discord.provider.js`; a constant
+// rather than a literal because it appears in two queries and a typo in either
+// would silently return an empty grant set — a Team whose channel nobody can
+// enter, with no error anywhere.
+const DISCORD_PROVIDER = 'discord'
+
+// Deliberately WITHOUT `i.team_id`, and this is not tidiness.
+//
+// The two queries below join `teams` and already select `t.id AS team_id`, so
+// including the integration row's copy produces two result columns with the same
+// name — which the `mariadb` driver refuses outright: "Error in results, duplicate
+// field name `team_id`". Every caller sees the whole pass fail, and no unit test
+// can see it, because they stub this layer.
+//
+// It would also be the WRONG column even if the driver allowed it: `desiredTeams`
+// LEFT JOINs, so `i.team_id` is NULL for exactly the Teams that have no channel
+// yet — the create case, where knowing the Team's id matters most. The two queries
+// that do not join `teams` ask for it explicitly.
+const COLUMNS = `
+  i.id, i.platform, i.resource, i.external_ref, i.role_ref,
+  i.state, i.remove_after, i.last_error, i.synced_at, i.updated_at`
+
+/**
+ * Every Team that qualifies for a resource, with its integration row if it has
+ * one.
+ *
+ * The three conditions are §7.3's provisioning gate and §2.8's publication rule
+ * together:
+ *
+ *   - `status = 'active'` — an archived Team is a record, not a place to talk.
+ *   - `hidden = 0` — the channel is NAMED after the Team, and a Discord channel
+ *     name is a game-sourced string published outside the site. A hidden Team's
+ *     name is suppressed on every public surface; a voice channel would be the
+ *     one place it still appeared.
+ *   - `member_count >= ?` — the operator's threshold, counting ALL active members
+ *     regardless of what they have linked (org lead, 2026-08-18). §7.3 wrote
+ *     `voice_min_linked_members`; the number an operator is actually judging is
+ *     "is this Team real", and link state answers a different question.
+ *
+ * LEFT JOIN rather than two queries: the reconciler needs "should have, and does
+ * it" as one answer, and a Team with no row yet is the create case.
+ */
+async function desiredTeams({ platform, resource, minMembers }) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT t.id AS team_id, t.name, t.display_name_override, t.slug, t.abbr,
+            t.member_count, t.linked_count, ${COLUMNS}
+       FROM teams t
+       LEFT JOIN team_integrations i
+         ON i.team_id = t.id AND i.platform = ? AND i.resource = ?
+      WHERE t.status = 'active' AND t.hidden = 0 AND t.member_count >= ?
+      ORDER BY t.id`,
+    [platform, resource, Number(minMembers)],
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * Rows that hold a resource for a Team that no longer qualifies.
+ *
+ * The mirror of `desiredTeams`, and deliberately not its negation in JavaScript:
+ * a Team can stop qualifying by being archived, by being hidden, by losing
+ * members, or by having its row deleted out from under core, and enumerating
+ * those in a filter would mean re-deriving the gate in a second place that could
+ * disagree with the first.
+ *
+ * Rows already in 'pending_removal' are included — the grace window is decided by
+ * the caller, which needs to see them to know whether one has expired.
+ */
+async function holdersWithoutClaim({ platform, resource, minMembers }) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT t.id AS team_id, t.name, t.display_name_override, t.status, t.hidden,
+            t.member_count, ${COLUMNS}
+       FROM team_integrations i
+       JOIN teams t ON t.id = i.team_id
+      WHERE i.platform = ? AND i.resource = ?
+        AND (i.external_ref IS NOT NULL OR i.role_ref IS NOT NULL)
+        AND (t.status <> 'active' OR t.hidden = 1 OR t.member_count < ?)
+      ORDER BY t.id`,
+    [platform, resource, Number(minMembers)],
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * The Discord user ids of a Team's members — hop 3 of §2.6, and the only set a
+ * role can be granted to.
+ *
+ * DISTINCT because a user could in principle hold two rows for the same provider
+ * across a provider rename; the unique key prevents it for one (provider,
+ * subject) pair, not for one user with two subjects. Two role-adds for the same
+ * person is harmless and one duplicate in a diff is a phantom removal next pass,
+ * which is not.
+ */
+async function discordSubjectsFor(teamId) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT DISTINCT ui.subject
+       FROM team_members m
+       JOIN user_identities ui ON ui.user_id = m.user_id AND ui.provider = ?
+      WHERE m.team_id = ? AND m.status = 'active' AND m.user_id IS NOT NULL
+      ORDER BY ui.subject`,
+    [DISCORD_PROVIDER, Number(teamId)],
+  )
+  return rows.map((row) => String(row.subject))
+}
+
+/** Every row for a platform, with the Team's name — the admin panel's listing. */
+async function listForPlatform(platform, resource) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT i.team_id, ${COLUMNS}, t.name AS team_name, t.slug AS team_slug,
+            t.display_name_override, t.status AS team_status, t.hidden AS team_hidden,
+            t.member_count, t.linked_count
+       FROM team_integrations i
+       JOIN teams t ON t.id = i.team_id
+      WHERE i.platform = ? AND i.resource = ?
+      ORDER BY t.name`,
+    [platform, resource],
+  )
+}
+
+async function getForTeam(teamId, platform, resource) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT i.team_id, ${COLUMNS} FROM team_integrations i
+      WHERE i.team_id = ? AND i.platform = ? AND i.resource = ? LIMIT 1`,
+    [Number(teamId), platform, resource],
+  )
+  return rows[0] || null
+}
+
+/**
+ * Write what the reconciler believes after a pass.
+ *
+ * A full upsert of the mutable columns rather than a patch, because every caller
+ * has just decided all of them together: a pass that created a channel knows the
+ * state, the refs, the error (none) and the stamp, and letting it write three of
+ * the four would leave the fourth describing a previous pass.
+ *
+ * `remove_after` is written explicitly on every call, `NULL` included — a Team
+ * that climbs back above the threshold inside its window has to have the window
+ * cleared, and an upsert that skipped NULLs would leave it armed.
+ */
+async function upsert({ teamId, platform, resource, externalRef, roleRef, state, removeAfter, lastError, syncedAt }) {
+  await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_integrations
+       (team_id, platform, resource, external_ref, role_ref, state, remove_after, last_error, synced_at)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
+     ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
+       external_ref = VALUES(external_ref),
+       role_ref     = VALUES(role_ref),
+       state        = VALUES(state),
+       remove_after = VALUES(remove_after),
+       last_error   = VALUES(last_error),
+       synced_at    = VALUES(synced_at)`,
+    [
+      Number(teamId),
+      platform,
+      resource,
+      externalRef || null,
+      roleRef || null,
+      state,
+      removeAfter || null,
+      lastError ? String(lastError).slice(0, 500) : null,
+      syncedAt || null,
+    ],
+  )
+  return getForTeam(teamId, platform, resource)
+}
+
+async function remove(teamId, platform, resource) {
+  const res = await query(
+    'DELETE FROM team_integrations WHERE team_id = ? AND platform = ? AND resource = ?',
+    [Number(teamId), platform, resource],
+  )
+  return Number(res && res.affectedRows) || 0
+}
+
+/** How many rows currently hold a role — the input to the 250-role ceiling. */
+async function roleCount(platform) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    'SELECT COUNT(*) AS n FROM team_integrations WHERE platform = ? AND role_ref IS NOT NULL',
+    [platform],
+  )
+  return Number(rows[0] && rows[0].n) || 0
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  DISCORD_PROVIDER,
+  desiredTeams,
+  holdersWithoutClaim,
+  discordSubjectsFor,
+  listForPlatform,
+  getForTeam,
+  upsert,
+  remove,
+  roleCount,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamVoice.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+// ── One voice channel per Team: what core believes, and what it wants ──────
+//
+// TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9. This file answers three questions and makes no calls:
+// which Teams should have a voice channel, who should be able to enter it, and
+// what should happen to the ones that should not have it any more. The pass that
+// actually reaches Discord is `utils/teamVoiceSync.js`.
+//
+// **Access is a per-Team ROLE, always.** §7.3 specified per-member permission
+// overwrites with escalation to a role above ~90 members; the org lead settled on
+// roles always (2026-08-18). What that changes is not just a code path:
+//
+//   - `voice_overwrite_max`, the escalation and the `overwrites`/`role` mode
+//     transition all leave the design. There is no mode.
+//   - The binding limit moves. Overwrites are capped per channel (~100), so the
+//     old shape's ceiling was "one very large Team"; roles are capped per GUILD
+//     (250), so the new shape's ceiling is "how many Teams have voice at all". A
+//     limit on the number of Teams is a limit an operator has to be told about
+//     before they hit it, which is why `roleCap` is in the admin payload and not
+//     just in a `last_error` after a create failed.
+//   - A role is visible on a member's Discord profile and an overwrite is not, so
+//     membership of a Team becomes guild-visible. That is the trade the decision
+//     bought and it is not reversible per-deployment.
+//
+// **Three things §7.3 named that this codebase does not have**, all settled the
+// same way — by asking the operator, because nothing in the data model can answer:
+// "the staff role" (see `teamVoiceSettings`), the parent category's identity, and
+// whether the bot can manage channels and roles at all.
+//
+// **Hidden Teams are never provisioned.** A Discord channel name is a
+// game-sourced string published outside the site, which is precisely §2.8's
+// concern — `utils/reservedNames.js` already names "and eventually a Discord
+// channel name" as one of the surfaces it protects. So the screen that suppresses
+// a Team's public page suppresses its channel too, and the interlock is free: the
+// gate is `hidden = 0` in one query rather than a second policy that could drift
+// from the first.
+
+const voiceDb = require('./teamVoice.db')
+const settings = require('./teamVoiceSettings.model')
+
+const PLATFORM = 'discord'
+const RESOURCE = 'voice'
+
+// Discord's own limits on the two names this phase writes. Both are 100; kept as
+// two constants because they are two independent promises and a future platform
+// will not share them.
+const CHANNEL_NAME_MAX = 100
+const ROLE_NAME_MAX = 100
+
+// How many role add/remove operations one pass hands the bot for one Team.
+//
+// A bound rather than "all of them", because each is its own Discord API call and
+// an unbounded first pass on a 300-member guild is a request that outlives its own
+// timeout — and a timeout is the one failure that leaves core not knowing what was
+// applied. Bounded passes converge instead: the remainder is reported and the next
+// pass takes the next slice.
+const MEMBER_OPS_PER_PASS = 50
+
+// Control characters, as a named constant: a literal control byte in a source
+// file is invisible to every reader and to most diffs.
+const CONTROL_CHARS = /[\u0000-\u001f\u007f]/g
+
+/**
+ * The name a Team's channel and role carry.
+ *
+ * `display_name_override` first, because §2.8.3 gives staff a way to change what
+ * is DISPLAYED without touching identity, and a channel is a display surface. A
+ * Team whose name staff rewrote must not keep publishing the original one to
+ * Discord.
+ *
+ * The fallback is the Team's id, not its slug: a name that sanitises down to
+ * nothing is a name made entirely of characters Discord will not take, and the
+ * slug is derived from that same name, so it can be empty for the same reason.
+ */
+function displayName(team) {
+  return sanitiseName(team.display_name_override || team.name) || `team-${team.team_id || team.id}`
+}
+
+/**
+ * Strip what Discord will not carry, and nothing else.
+ *
+ * Deliberately not a slugifier. A voice channel keeps its spaces and its case —
+ * unlike a text channel, which Discord lowercases and hyphenates itself — so
+ * "The Silver Hand" should reach the guild as "The Silver Hand" and not as
+ * "the-silver-hand". Control characters go because they can hide the rest of a
+ * name; everything else a player can type is left alone, since core is a mirror of
+ * the game and not an editor of it.
+ */
+function sanitiseName(value) {
+  const text = String(value || '').replace(CONTROL_CHARS, ' ').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim()
+  return text.slice(0, Math.min(CHANNEL_NAME_MAX, ROLE_NAME_MAX))
+}
+
+/** When a Team that stopped qualifying loses its channel. */
+function removeAfterFrom(graceDays, now = new Date()) {
+  return new Date(now.getTime() + graceDays * 86400_000)
+}
+
+const isExpired = (row, now = new Date()) => !!row
+  && !!row.remove_after
+  && new Date(row.remove_after).getTime() <= now.getTime()
+
+/**
+ * Everything one pass needs, resolved before it makes a single call.
+ *
+ * Returns `null` when voice is off, which is the answer on most deployments and
+ * is not an error.
+ *
+ * **Turning the feature off does not tear anything down.** A toggle that deleted
+ * guild structure would make "let me see what this does" destructive, and a voice
+ * channel that outlives its setting is inert — nobody's access changes, the
+ * channel simply stops being reconciled. The admin panel says how many are still
+ * provisioned and offers to remove them one at a time, which is a decision an
+ * operator makes rather than a side effect of a checkbox.
+ */
+async function plan({ now = new Date() } = {}) {
+  const config = await settings.all()
+  if (!config.enabled) return null
+
+  const [desired, holders] = await Promise.all([
+    voiceDb.desiredTeams({ platform: PLATFORM, resource: RESOURCE, minMembers: config.minMembers }),
+    voiceDb.holdersWithoutClaim({ platform: PLATFORM, resource: RESOURCE, minMembers: config.minMembers }),
+  ])
+
+  // A Team that qualifies again while inside its grace window appears in BOTH
+  // queries only if the queries disagree, which they cannot — `desiredTeams`
+  // requires it to qualify and `holdersWithoutClaim` requires it not to. So the
+  // recovery case lands in `provision` with a row that still has `remove_after`
+  // set, and clearing that stamp is what "cancel the removal" means.
+  //
+  // §7.3 promises no Discord call is made when a Team recovers. As built the
+  // promise is narrower and truer: no DESTRUCTIVE call is made. A Team that
+  // regained members has members to grant, and the ordinary membership diff is
+  // what grants them — refusing to make any call at all would leave the people
+  // who brought it back above the threshold outside the channel.
+  const provision = desired.map((row) => ({
+    team: row,
+    name: displayName(row),
+    hasRow: !!row.id,
+    recovering: row.state === 'pending_removal',
+  }))
+
+  const removals = []
+  const scheduled = []
+  for (const row of holders) {
+    if (row.state !== 'pending_removal' || !row.remove_after) {
+      scheduled.push({ team: row, removeAfter: removeAfterFrom(config.graceDays, now), reason: removalReason(row) })
+    } else if (isExpired(row, now)) {
+      removals.push({ team: row, reason: removalReason(row) })
+    }
+  }
+
+  return { config, provision, scheduled, removals }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Why a Team is losing its channel, in the words an operator reads in the panel.
+ *
+ * Three distinguishable causes, and they are worth distinguishing: "archived" is
+ * expected, "below the threshold" is a Team shrinking, and "hidden" is a
+ * moderation decision somebody made — which is the one where a surprised operator
+ * would otherwise go looking for a bug.
+ */
+function removalReason(row) {
+  if (row.team_status && row.team_status !== 'active') return 'archived'
+  if (row.status && row.status !== 'active') return 'archived'
+  if (row.hidden || row.team_hidden) return 'hidden'
+  return 'below_threshold'
+}
+
+/** The Discord ids a Team's role should be granted to — hop 3 of §2.6. */
+async function memberRefs(teamId) {
+  return voiceDb.discordSubjectsFor(teamId)
+}
+
+/** The admin panel's listing: every row, with the Team it belongs to. */
+async function list() {
+  const rows = await voiceDb.listForPlatform(PLATFORM, RESOURCE)
+  return rows.map((row) => ({
+    teamId: row.team_id,
+    teamName: row.display_name_override || row.team_name,
+    teamSlug: row.team_slug,
+    teamStatus: row.team_status,
+    teamHidden: !!row.team_hidden,
+    memberCount: row.member_count,
+    linkedCount: row.linked_count,
+    channelRef: row.external_ref,
+    roleRef: row.role_ref,
+    state: row.state,
+    removeAfter: row.remove_after,
+    lastError: row.last_error,
+    syncedAt: row.synced_at,
+    updatedAt: row.updated_at,
+  }))
+}
+
+async function getForTeam(teamId) {
+  return voiceDb.getForTeam(teamId, PLATFORM, RESOURCE)
+}
+
+/** Record the outcome of one Team's pass. */
+async function record({ teamId, channelRef, roleRef, state, removeAfter = null, lastError = null, syncedAt = null }) {
+  return voiceDb.upsert({
+    teamId,
+    platform: PLATFORM,
+    resource: RESOURCE,
+    externalRef: channelRef,
+    roleRef,
+    state,
+    removeAfter,
+    lastError,
+    syncedAt,
+  })
+}
+
+async function forget(teamId) {
+  return voiceDb.remove(teamId, PLATFORM, RESOURCE)
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  PLATFORM,
+  RESOURCE,
+  CHANNEL_NAME_MAX,
+  MEMBER_OPS_PER_PASS,
+  displayName,
+  sanitiseName,
+  removeAfterFrom,
+  isExpired,
+  removalReason,
+  plan,
+  memberRefs,
+  list,
+  getForTeam,
+  record,
+  forget,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teamVoiceSettings.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+// ── The operator's voice controls ──────────────────────────────────────────
+//
+// TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9. Five `settings` keys, in their own file for the reason
+// `teamForumSettings` is: two of them are not ordinary keys. `teams_voice_enabled`
+// has a server-side precondition (the bot must actually be able to manage channels
+// and roles — §7.3 assumed it could and the tree has never checked), and
+// `teams_voice_category_ref` is written by the SERVER after the bot reports what
+// it created, not by the admin who is looking at the form.
+//
+//   teams_voice_enabled       '0' | '1'          default '0' — off
+//   teams_voice_min_members   1 … 10000          default 5
+//   teams_voice_grace_days    0 … 90             default 7
+//   teams_voice_category_ref  a channel id       absent until the bot makes one
+//   teams_voice_staff_roles   CSV of role ids    empty by default
+//
+// **Every read fails closed**, the same bargain the forum settings take: a DB
+// fault reports voice off, which costs a pass that does nothing and is repeated
+// fifteen minutes later. Failing open would mean creating guild structure on the
+// strength of a query that did not answer.
+//
+// **`teams_voice_staff_roles` exists because "the staff role" does not.** §7.3
+// grants the staff role an overwrite on every Team channel; this codebase has no
+// staff-role concept at all — `guild_config` knows a news channel, a modlog
+// channel, an autorole and a filter allowlist, and none of them means "staff".
+// Guild administrators bypass channel overwrites anyway, so what is actually
+// missing is a way to let NON-admin staff in, and only the operator can say which
+// of their Discord roles those are. Empty is a legitimate and common answer.
+
+const settingsDb = require('../settings/settings.db')
+
+const ENABLED_KEY = 'teams_voice_enabled'
+const MIN_MEMBERS_KEY = 'teams_voice_min_members'
+const GRACE_DAYS_KEY = 'teams_voice_grace_days'
+const CATEGORY_KEY = 'teams_voice_category_ref'
+const STAFF_ROLES_KEY = 'teams_voice_staff_roles'
+
+const MIN_MEMBERS_DEFAULT = 5
+const MIN_MEMBERS_MAX = 10000
+
+const GRACE_DAYS_DEFAULT = 7
+const GRACE_DAYS_MAX = 90
+
+// Discord's guild-wide role cap. It is the ceiling on how many Teams can have
+// voice at all, and it is here rather than in the bot because the admin panel has
+// to be able to say "you are at 231 of 250" BEFORE a create fails — §7.3's error
+// state per Team is a diagnosis, not a warning.
+//
+// The number is Discord's and core cannot read it; a guild that gets a different
+// one is a guild where this warns early, which is the harmless direction.
+const ROLE_CAP = 250
+
+// The same shape `teamIntegration.model` validates a channel with. Core treats
+// every Discord id as opaque and only checks it could be one.
+const SNOWFLAKE_RE = /^[0-9]{5,32}$/
+
+/** Is voice provisioning switched on? Fail closed. */
+async function enabled() {
+  try {
+    return String(await settingsDb.get(ENABLED_KEY)) === '1'
+  } catch {
+    return false
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The membership threshold, counting every active member (org lead, 2026-08-18).
+ *
+ * Fails closed to the DEFAULT rather than to zero, unlike the forum's edit window:
+ * zero here would mean "provision every Team including the one-person ones", which
+ * is the expensive direction against a 250-role cap. The default is the
+ * conservative answer, not the permissive one.
+ */
+async function minMembers() {
+  try {
+    const raw = await settingsDb.get(MIN_MEMBERS_KEY)
+    if (raw == null || raw === '') return MIN_MEMBERS_DEFAULT
+    const n = Number(raw)
+    if (!Number.isFinite(n) || n < 1 || n > MIN_MEMBERS_MAX) return MIN_MEMBERS_DEFAULT
+    return Math.floor(n)
+  } catch {
+    return MIN_MEMBERS_DEFAULT
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * How long a Team keeps its channel after it stops qualifying (§7.3).
+ *
+ * `0` is legitimate and means "remove on the next pass" — an operator who would
+ * rather not have stale channels lying about. A DB fault reports the default, so a
+ * transient error can never turn the window off and delete something early; the
+ * grace window's whole job is to not act in a hurry.
+ */
+async function graceDays() {
+  try {
+    const raw = await settingsDb.get(GRACE_DAYS_KEY)
+    if (raw == null || raw === '') return GRACE_DAYS_DEFAULT
+    const n = Number(raw)
+    if (!Number.isFinite(n) || n < 0 || n > GRACE_DAYS_MAX) return GRACE_DAYS_DEFAULT
+    return Math.floor(n)
+  } catch {
+    return GRACE_DAYS_DEFAULT
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The parent category every Team channel is created under, or null.
+ *
+ * Not an admin field. The bot creates the category on the first pass that needs
+ * one and reports the id back; the server stores it here so the next pass reuses
+ * it instead of making a second. An operator who wants a different category
+ * deletes this value (or the category) and the next pass makes a fresh one — which
+ * is why it is exposed read-only in the panel with a clear button rather than as a
+ * text input somebody could point at a channel that is not a category.
+ */
+async function categoryRef() {
+  try {
+    const value = await settingsDb.get(CATEGORY_KEY)
+    const text = String(value || '').trim()
+    return SNOWFLAKE_RE.test(text) ? text : null
+  } catch {
+    return null
+  }
+}
+
+async function setCategoryRef(value, actorId = null) {
+  const text = String(value || '').trim()
+  if (text && !SNOWFLAKE_RE.test(text)) throw new Error('category ref must be a numeric channel id')
+  return settingsDb.set(CATEGORY_KEY, text || null, actorId)
+}
+
+/**
+ * The roles that see every Team voice channel, in addition to that Team's own.
+ *
+ * Stored as CSV for the same reason `filter_allow_roles` is — `settings.value` is
+ * a VARCHAR and a JSON array in it buys nothing when the elements are numeric ids.
+ * Unreadable entries are DROPPED rather than rejected on read: a hand-edited row
+ * with one bad id should cost that id, not every staff grant on the deployment.
+ */
+async function staffRoles() {
+  try {
+    const raw = await settingsDb.get(STAFF_ROLES_KEY)
+    return parseRoles(raw)
+  } catch {
+    return []
+  }
+}
+
+function parseRoles(raw) {
+  return String(raw || '')
+    .split(',')
+    .map((part) => part.trim())
+    .filter((part) => SNOWFLAKE_RE.test(part))
+}
+
+/**
+ * Validate an operator-supplied staff-role list on the way IN, where a typo can
+ * still be reported to the person who made it.
+ *
+ * Rejected rather than filtered, the same call the bridge's event list makes: a
+ * silently-dropped id is a settings screen that shows you saved something you did
+ * not, and a role that was supposed to see every Team channel and does not is a
+ * failure nobody would think to look for.
+ */
+function normaliseStaffRoles(input) {
+  const parts = Array.isArray(input)
+    ? input
+    : String(input == null ? '' : input).split(',')
+  const seen = []
+  for (const part of parts) {
+    const id = String(part || '').trim()
+    if (!id) continue
+    if (!SNOWFLAKE_RE.test(id)) {
+      const err = new Error(`not a role id: ${id}`)
+      err.status = 400
+      throw err
+    }
+    if (!seen.includes(id)) seen.push(id)
+  }
+  return seen
+}
+
+/** Everything the reconciler and the admin panel both need, in one read. */
+async function all() {
+  const [on, min, grace, category, staff] = await Promise.all([
+    enabled(), minMembers(), graceDays(), categoryRef(), staffRoles(),
+  ])
+  return {
+    enabled: on,
+    minMembers: min,
+    graceDays: grace,
+    categoryRef: category,
+    staffRoles: staff,
+    roleCap: ROLE_CAP,
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Persist an admin's save. Returns the settings as they now read, so the panel
+ * renders what was stored rather than what was typed.
+ *
+ * The enable PRECONDITION is not here: it needs the bot, and a settings module
+ * that reached across to another process to validate a write would be impossible
+ * to test and surprising to read. The controller asks the bot and refuses, in the
+ * same shape §7.2's acknowledgement refuses — 422 before the write, never a quiet
+ * failure after it.
+ */
+async function save({ enabled: on, minMembers: min, graceDays: grace, staffRoles: staff }, actorId = null) {
+  const next = {}
+  if (on !== undefined) next[ENABLED_KEY] = on ? '1' : '0'
+  if (min !== undefined) {
+    const n = Number(min)
+    if (!Number.isInteger(n) || n < 1 || n > MIN_MEMBERS_MAX) {
+      const err = new Error(`minimum members must be between 1 and ${MIN_MEMBERS_MAX}`)
+      err.status = 400
+      throw err
+    }
+    next[MIN_MEMBERS_KEY] = String(n)
+  }
+  if (grace !== undefined) {
+    const n = Number(grace)
+    if (!Number.isInteger(n) || n < 0 || n > GRACE_DAYS_MAX) {
+      const err = new Error(`the grace window must be between 0 and ${GRACE_DAYS_MAX} days`)
+      err.status = 400
+      throw err
+    }
+    next[GRACE_DAYS_KEY] = String(n)
+  }
+  if (staff !== undefined) next[STAFF_ROLES_KEY] = normaliseStaffRoles(staff).join(',')
+
+  for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(next)) {
+    // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+    await settingsDb.set(key, value, actorId)
+  }
+  return all()
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  ENABLED_KEY,
+  MIN_MEMBERS_KEY,
+  GRACE_DAYS_KEY,
+  CATEGORY_KEY,
+  STAFF_ROLES_KEY,
+  MIN_MEMBERS_DEFAULT,
+  GRACE_DAYS_DEFAULT,
+  ROLE_CAP,
+  enabled,
+  minMembers,
+  graceDays,
+  categoryRef,
+  setCategoryRef,
+  staffRoles,
+  parseRoles,
+  normaliseStaffRoles,
+  all,
+  save,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teams.db.js

@@ -0,0 +1,312 @@
+// SQL for the Team tables. Raw parameterised mariadb, no ORM, per the layered
+// backend convention (router → controller → model → db).
+//
+// This file holds statements only. Every decision about WHETHER to write — the
+// four refusal gates, the quarantine, the rename rule — lives in the models above
+// it, because a gate expressed as a WHERE clause is a gate nobody can find.
+
+const { query } = require('../../utils/db')
+
+// ── teams ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+const TEAM_COLUMNS = `
+  id, module_id, external_id, name, abbr, slug, status, meta,
+  member_count, linked_count, online_count,
+  hidden, hidden_reason, hidden_term, name_reviewed_at, display_name_override,
+  roster_synced_at, members_empty_since,
+  succeeded_by, created_at, archived_at, archived_reason`
+
+/** Every ACTIVE team for a module — the set the reconciler diffs against. */
+async function activeByModule(moduleId) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT ${TEAM_COLUMNS} FROM teams WHERE module_id = ? AND status = 'active' ORDER BY id`,
+    [moduleId],
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * Every ACTIVE team, whichever module owns it.
+ *
+ * For the READ side, which must not be keyed on a provider being registered. The
+ * rows are core's and they outlive the module that filled them — a module
+ * uninstalled or disabled leaves a projection that is unmaintained, not one that
+ * stopped existing. Listing by provider made `/teams` empty while
+ * `/teams/:slug/members` still answered in full, since the lookup goes by slug:
+ * the index denied a Team that direct URLs served.
+ */
+async function allActive() {
+  return query(`SELECT ${TEAM_COLUMNS} FROM teams WHERE status = 'active' ORDER BY id`)
+}
+
+/** The ACTIVE row for an external id, or undefined. At most one, by uq_teams_active. */
+async function findActive(moduleId, externalId) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT ${TEAM_COLUMNS} FROM teams WHERE module_id = ? AND external_id = ? AND status = 'active'`,
+    [moduleId, externalId],
+  )
+  return rows[0]
+}
+
+async function findById(id) {
+  const rows = await query(`SELECT ${TEAM_COLUMNS} FROM teams WHERE id = ?`, [id])
+  return rows[0]
+}
+
+/** By slug, ACTIVE or ARCHIVED — an archived Team stays reachable at its old slug (§2.2). */
+async function findBySlug(slug) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT ${TEAM_COLUMNS} FROM teams WHERE slug = ? ORDER BY (status = 'active') DESC, id DESC LIMIT 1`,
+    [slug],
+  )
+  return rows[0]
+}
+
+/**
+ * Slugs already taken, ACTIVE OR ARCHIVED.
+ *
+ * The unique key only constrains active rows, and this deliberately checks more
+ * than the key does: §2.2 promises an archived Team stays readable at its old
+ * slug, and handing that slug to a new Team would silently break every bookmark
+ * and Discord link pointing at the old one.
+ */
+async function slugsLike(base) {
+  const rows = await query('SELECT slug FROM teams WHERE slug = ? OR slug LIKE ?', [base, `${base}-%`])
+  return rows.map((r) => r.slug)
+}
+
+async function insertTeam({ moduleId, externalId, name, abbr, slug, meta, hidden, hiddenReason, hiddenTerm }) {
+  const res = await query(
+    `INSERT INTO teams (module_id, external_id, name, abbr, slug, meta, hidden, hidden_reason, hidden_term)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)`,
+    [moduleId, externalId, name, abbr, slug, meta == null ? null : JSON.stringify(meta),
+      hidden ? 1 : 0, hiddenReason || null, hiddenTerm || null],
+  )
+  return res.insertId
+}
+
+/** Update the mutable fields. `name` and `slug` are absent by design — §2.2 freezes both. */
+async function updateTeam(id, { abbr, meta }) {
+  await query('UPDATE teams SET abbr = ?, meta = ? WHERE id = ?',
+    [abbr, meta == null ? null : JSON.stringify(meta), id])
+}
+
+async function archiveTeam(id, reason, succeededBy = null) {
+  await query(
+    `UPDATE teams SET status = 'archived', archived_at = NOW(), archived_reason = ?, succeeded_by = ?
+     WHERE id = ? AND status = 'active'`,
+    [reason, succeededBy, id],
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * Recompute the three denormalised counts from the projection.
+ *
+ * Derived in one statement rather than incremented as rows change, so a missed
+ * delta can never leave a count drifting from the table it summarises — the count
+ * is only ever as wrong as the projection is.
+ */
+async function recount(teamId) {
+  await query(
+    `UPDATE teams t SET
+       member_count = (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM team_members m WHERE m.team_id = t.id AND m.status = 'active'),
+       linked_count = (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM team_members m WHERE m.team_id = t.id AND m.status = 'active' AND m.user_id IS NOT NULL),
+       online_count = (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM team_members m WHERE m.team_id = t.id AND m.status = 'active' AND m.online = 1)
+     WHERE t.id = ?`,
+    [teamId],
+  )
+}
+
+// ── team_members ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+const MEMBER_COLUMNS = `
+  team_id, member_key, display_name, user_id, is_leader, rank_label, online, status,
+  first_seen_at, last_seen_at, departed_at`
+
+async function membersByTeam(teamId, { includeDeparted = false } = {}) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT ${MEMBER_COLUMNS} FROM team_members WHERE team_id = ?` +
+      (includeDeparted ? '' : " AND status = 'active'") +
+      ' ORDER BY is_leader DESC, display_name, member_key',
+    [teamId],
+  )
+}
+
+async function memberKeys(teamId) {
+  const rows = await query("SELECT member_key FROM team_members WHERE team_id = ? AND status = 'active'", [teamId])
+  return rows.map((r) => r.member_key)
+}
+
+async function findMember(teamId, memberKey) {
+  const rows = await query(`SELECT ${MEMBER_COLUMNS} FROM team_members WHERE team_id = ? AND member_key = ?`,
+    [teamId, memberKey])
+  return rows[0]
+}
+
+/** The caller's ACTIVE membership of a team, or undefined. Path 1 of §2.5, and only path 1. */
+async function activeByUser(teamId, userId) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT ${MEMBER_COLUMNS} FROM team_members WHERE team_id = ? AND user_id = ? AND status = 'active'`,
+    [teamId, userId],
+  )
+  return rows[0]
+}
+
+/** Every ACTIVE membership a user holds, with the team joined on. */
+async function activeTeamsForUser(userId) {
+  return query(
+    `SELECT ${TEAM_COLUMNS.split(',').map((c) => `t.${c.trim()}`).join(', ')},
+            m.member_key, m.is_leader, m.rank_label, m.display_name AS member_display_name
+     FROM team_members m JOIN teams t ON t.id = m.team_id
+     WHERE m.user_id = ? AND m.status = 'active' AND t.status = 'active'
+     ORDER BY t.name`,
+    [userId],
+  )
+}
+
+/**
+ * Insert or refresh one member row.
+ *
+ * `first_seen_at` is never overwritten, so a member who leaves and rejoins keeps
+ * the date they first appeared; `status` returns to active on the same statement,
+ * which is what makes a rejoin a revived row rather than a second one.
+ *
+ * **`is_leader` is set on INSERT only, and deliberately not on update.** Path 2 of
+ * §2.5 is answered by `getTeamLeaders()`, not by the roster — two writers for one
+ * column is how a refused leadership answer turns into a silent demotion, because
+ * the roster would already have written `leader: false` before the authoritative
+ * call was even made. Seeding it on insert means a Team whose leadership call is
+ * failing is not leaderless from the start; after that, only setLeaders() moves it.
+ */
+async function upsertMember({ teamId, memberKey, displayName, userId, isLeader, rankLabel, online }) {
+  await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_members (team_id, member_key, display_name, user_id, is_leader, rank_label, online)
+     VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
+     ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
+       display_name = VALUES(display_name),
+       user_id      = VALUES(user_id),
+       rank_label   = VALUES(rank_label),
+       online       = VALUES(online),
+       status       = 'active',
+       departed_at  = NULL,
+       last_seen_at = NOW()`,
+    [teamId, memberKey, displayName, userId, isLeader ? 1 : 0, rankLabel, online ? 1 : 0],
+  )
+}
+
+/** Soft-depart the named members. Rows are kept so history and rejoins survive. */
+async function markDeparted(teamId, memberKeys_) {
+  if (!memberKeys_.length) return
+  const holes = memberKeys_.map(() => '?').join(', ')
+  await query(
+    `UPDATE team_members SET status = 'departed', departed_at = NOW(), online = 0
+     WHERE team_id = ? AND status = 'active' AND member_key IN (${holes})`,
+    [teamId, ...memberKeys_],
+  )
+}
+
+/** Set is_leader for a whole team in one pass — the sync's path-2 write. */
+async function setLeaders(teamId, leaderKeys) {
+  if (leaderKeys.length) {
+    const holes = leaderKeys.map(() => '?').join(', ')
+    await query(
+      `UPDATE team_members SET is_leader = (member_key IN (${holes})) WHERE team_id = ?`,
+      [...leaderKeys, teamId],
+    )
+  } else {
+    await query('UPDATE team_members SET is_leader = 0 WHERE team_id = ?', [teamId])
+  }
+}
+
+async function setMemberLeader(teamId, memberKey, isLeader) {
+  await query('UPDATE team_members SET is_leader = ? WHERE team_id = ? AND member_key = ?',
+    [isLeader ? 1 : 0, teamId, memberKey])
+}
+
+// ── team_sync_state ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+async function syncState(moduleId) {
+  const rows = await query(
+    `SELECT module_id, last_attempt_at, last_success_at, consecutive_failures, last_error, pending_empty_since
+     FROM team_sync_state WHERE module_id = ?`,
+    [moduleId],
+  )
+  return rows[0]
+}
+
+async function recordAttempt(moduleId) {
+  await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_sync_state (module_id, last_attempt_at) VALUES (?, NOW())
+     ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE last_attempt_at = NOW()`,
+    [moduleId],
+  )
+}
+
+async function recordFailure(moduleId, error) {
+  await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_sync_state (module_id, last_attempt_at, consecutive_failures, last_error)
+     VALUES (?, NOW(), 1, ?)
+     ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
+       last_attempt_at = NOW(),
+       consecutive_failures = consecutive_failures + 1,
+       last_error = VALUES(last_error)`,
+    [moduleId, String(error || '').slice(0, 500)],
+  )
+}
+
+async function recordSuccess(moduleId) {
+  await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_sync_state (module_id, last_attempt_at, last_success_at, consecutive_failures, last_error)
+     VALUES (?, NOW(), NOW(), 0, NULL)
+     ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
+       last_attempt_at = NOW(), last_success_at = NOW(), consecutive_failures = 0, last_error = NULL`,
+    [moduleId],
+  )
+}
+
+/** Bumped only when a roster was actually APPLIED — never on a refused call. */
+async function markRosterSynced(teamId) {
+  await query('UPDATE teams SET roster_synced_at = NOW() WHERE id = ?', [teamId])
+}
+
+/** §2.4 gate 4's per-Team quarantine. `since = null` clears it. */
+async function setMembersEmptySince(teamId, since) {
+  await query('UPDATE teams SET members_empty_since = ? WHERE id = ?', [since, teamId])
+}
+
+/** The §2.4 gate-2 quarantine. `since = null` clears it. */
+async function setPendingEmpty(moduleId, since) {
+  await query(
+    `INSERT INTO team_sync_state (module_id, pending_empty_since) VALUES (?, ?)
+     ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE pending_empty_since = VALUES(pending_empty_since)`,
+    [moduleId, since],
+  )
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  activeByModule,
+  allActive,
+  findActive,
+  findById,
+  findBySlug,
+  slugsLike,
+  insertTeam,
+  updateTeam,
+  archiveTeam,
+  recount,
+  markRosterSynced,
+  setMembersEmptySince,
+  membersByTeam,
+  memberKeys,
+  findMember,
+  activeByUser,
+  activeTeamsForUser,
+  upsertMember,
+  markDeparted,
+  setLeaders,
+  setMemberLeader,
+  syncState,
+  recordAttempt,
+  recordFailure,
+  recordSuccess,
+  setPendingEmpty,
+}

server/src/model/teams/teams.model.js

@@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
+// ── The Team read model ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+//
+// What the three API tiers are allowed to see (TEAMS.md §2.11), assembled from
+// the projection, the resolver and the sync state.
+//
+// **Two rules shape every function here.**
+//
+// 1. *Hidden means absent from every public surface* (§2.8.3) — the index, the
+//    lookup, the roster. Not archived, not deleted, and completely functional for
+//    its own members. A hidden Team that 404s publicly but answers for a member
+//    is the intended behaviour, not an inconsistency.
+//
+// 2. *Staleness is surfaced, never silent* (§2.4). Every public payload carries
+//    `{ stale, lastSyncAt }`, so a page can say "roster last confirmed 14 minutes
+//    ago" rather than presenting a stale roster as current. A projection nobody
+//    can tell is stale is worse than one that is obviously old.
+//
+// The per-audience FIELD projection of a roster row is the module's, not core's
+// (§10.5, §3.3) — the visibility framework and its config are module-owned. This
+// phase serves a conservative core projection: a public roster carries in-game
+// display names and never a site account id or a game member key. The module's
+// rung-aware projection lands with the Team pages in phase 3.
+
+const teamsDb = require('./teams.db')
+const teamProvider = require('./teamProvider')
+const access = require('./teamAccess.model')
+const teamSync = require('./teamSync.model')
+
+// Past this multiple of the poll interval a projection is reported stale. Two
+// intervals rather than one, so an ordinary late poll does not make every page
+// cry wolf — the threshold has to mean "something is wrong", not "a run is due".
+const STALE_INTERVALS = 2
+
+/** The public shape of a Team. Deliberately small. */
+function publicTeam(row) {
+  return {
+    slug: row.slug,
+    // What is DISPLAYED may have been overridden by staff; what the row IS never
+    // changes (§2.2, §2.8.3). Public callers only ever see the former.
+    name: row.display_name_override || row.name,
+    abbr: row.abbr,
+    memberCount: row.member_count,
+    linkedCount: row.linked_count,
+    onlineCount: row.online_count,
+    meta: row.meta ?? null,
+    status: row.status,
+    createdAt: row.created_at,
+    rosterSyncedAt: row.roster_synced_at,
+    ...(row.status === 'archived' ? { archivedAt: row.archived_at, archivedReason: row.archived_reason } : {}),
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The public shape of a roster row.
+ *
+ * `member_key` and `user_id` are both withheld: the first is a game-internal
+ * identifier and the second names a site account. `linked` answers the only
+ * question a public page has — whether this character has an account behind it —
+ * without publishing which one.
+ */
+function publicMember(row) {
+  return {
+    displayName: row.display_name,
+    rankLabel: row.rank_label,
+    isLeader: Boolean(row.is_leader),
+    online: Boolean(row.online),
+    linked: row.user_id != null,
+  }
+}
+
+/** The admin shape: everything, including what a decision overrode. */
+function adminTeam(row) {
+  return {
+    id: row.id,
+    moduleId: row.module_id,
+    externalId: row.external_id,
+    slug: row.slug,
+    name: row.name,
+    displayName: row.display_name_override || row.name,
+    displayNameOverride: row.display_name_override,
+    abbr: row.abbr,
+    status: row.status,
+    hidden: Boolean(row.hidden),
+    hiddenReason: row.hidden_reason,
+    hiddenTerm: row.hidden_term,
+    nameReviewedAt: row.name_reviewed_at,
+    memberCount: row.member_count,
+    linkedCount: row.linked_count,
+    onlineCount: row.online_count,
+    rosterSyncedAt: row.roster_synced_at,
+    membersEmptySince: row.members_empty_since,
+    succeededBy: row.succeeded_by,
+    createdAt: row.created_at,
+    archivedAt: row.archived_at,
+    archivedReason: row.archived_reason,
+    meta: row.meta ?? null,
+  }
+}
+
+function adminMember(row) {
+  return {
+    memberKey: row.member_key,
+    displayName: row.display_name,
+    userId: row.user_id,
+    rankLabel: row.rank_label,
+    isLeader: Boolean(row.is_leader),
+    isLeaderSynced: Boolean(row.is_leader_synced),
+    leaderOverride: row.leader_override || null,
+    online: Boolean(row.online),
+    status: row.status,
+    firstSeenAt: row.first_seen_at,
+    lastSeenAt: row.last_seen_at,
+    departedAt: row.departed_at,
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Freshness, as every public payload reports it.
+ *
+ * With no provider registered there is nothing to be stale ABOUT, so this reports
+ * `stale: false` and a null timestamp rather than "very stale" — a deployment
+ * with no game module is not a broken one.
+ */
+async function syncStatus() {
+  const moduleId = teamProvider.providerModuleId()
+  if (!moduleId) return { stale: false, lastSyncAt: null, configured: false }
+
+  const [state, intervalS] = await Promise.all([
+    teamsDb.syncState(moduleId),
+    teamSync.intervalSeconds(),
+  ])
+  const lastSyncAt = state ? state.last_success_at : null
+  const ageS = lastSyncAt ? (Date.now() - new Date(lastSyncAt).getTime()) / 1000 : Infinity
+  return {
+    configured: true,
+    lastSyncAt,
+    // Never synced at all is stale: a page must not present an empty projection
+    // as a confirmed empty shard.
+    stale: ageS > intervalS * STALE_INTERVALS,
+    consecutiveFailures: state ? state.consecutive_failures : 0,
+  }
+}
+
+// ── Public ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+async function listPublic({ limit = 50, offset = 0 } = {}) {
+  // Every active Team, not just the registered provider's. The rows are core's
+  // and they outlive the module that filled them: keying the index on a provider
+  // made an uninstalled module's Teams vanish from /teams while
+  // /teams/:slug/members still served them in full, because the lookup goes by
+  // slug. `configured: false` is how a client learns the projection is no longer
+  // being maintained -- an empty list would have said something untrue instead.
+  const [rows, sync] = await Promise.all([teamsDb.allActive(), syncStatus()])
+  const visible = rows.filter((r) => !r.hidden)
+  return {
+    teams: visible.slice(offset, offset + limit).map(publicTeam),
+    total: visible.length,
+    ...sync,
+    // What the `teams` nav feature flag resolves from (§3.5). True if a provider
+    // is registered OR any Team exists — the second half matters because Team
+    // rows outlive the module that filled them, and hiding the nav entry the
+    // moment a module is uninstalled would make every existing Team page
+    // unreachable from the site while still answering by URL.
+    //
+    // False only when there is nothing and no prospect of anything, which is
+    // exactly the bare-core case the flag exists for: a link to a permanently
+    // empty page is worse than no link.
+    enabled: Boolean(sync.configured) || visible.length > 0,
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * One Team by slug, for a public caller.
+ *
+ * An ARCHIVED Team resolves rather than 404ing (§2.2): a bookmark or a Discord
+ * link from before a rename must land somewhere that explains itself. A HIDDEN
+ * one does not resolve at all — that is the difference between retired and
+ * suppressed.
+ */
+async function getPublic(slug) {
+  const row = await teamsDb.findBySlug(slug)
+  if (!row || row.hidden) return null
+  const sync = await syncStatus()
+  const successor = row.succeeded_by ? await teamsDb.findById(row.succeeded_by) : null
+  return {
+    ...publicTeam(row),
+    // The three props the `team.overview` extension slot is declared with
+    // (§3.4). A module's slot component runs in the browser and has to know
+    // WHICH Team it is looking at, in its own vocabulary — `slug` is core's name
+    // for it and resolves nothing on the module's side.
+    //
+    // On this route only, deliberately: the index has no slot and would
+    // otherwise publish a module-internal identifier per row for nothing. None
+    // of the three names a person — they are a core row id, a game-side group
+    // id and a module name, and the identifiers §3.2 withholds (member keys,
+    // site account ids) are not among them.
+    id: row.id,
+    externalId: row.external_id,
+    moduleId: row.module_id,
+    ...sync,
+    successor: successor && !successor.hidden
+      ? { slug: successor.slug, name: successor.display_name_override || successor.name }
+      : null,
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * A Team's roster, projected for the caller's audience rung (§3.3).
+ *
+ * The ROW filter is the module's: it owns the visibility framework and its
+ * configuration (§10.5), and core does not know what a rung is. The FIELD shape
+ * stays core's — every row that survives goes through `publicMember`, which
+ * withholds the member key and the user id whatever the module answers. So a
+ * module can narrow what is published and cannot widen it, and core's "neither is
+ * published" guarantee does not rest on every module's good behaviour.
+ *
+ * **A module that HAS a rung system and cannot answer withholds the roster.** That
+ * is the one Team call where a refusal is not staleness: leaving a visibility
+ * answer "alone" would publish the very rows the rungs exist to withhold. A
+ * deployment with no module, or one whose module does not project at all, is a
+ * different case entirely — nothing is being withheld there, so the roster is
+ * served whole at core's public shape (`projects: false`).
+ */
+/**
+ * One Team named the way the MODULE names it (§3.4 as amended).
+ *
+ * The lookup a module's page needs. A module holds its own identity for a Team —
+ * a ServUO guild serial — and never core's row id or slug, deliberately: core's
+ * identifiers are core-internal (§10.3), and handing them out is how a module
+ * ends up storing them and then depending on them.
+ *
+ * Scoped to the naming module's OWN Teams. `module_id` comes from the path and is
+ * matched, not trusted: it cannot be used to read another module's Team, which
+ * matters because `external_id` is only unique within a module.
+ */
+async function getPublicByExternalId(moduleId, externalId) {
+  const row = await teamsDb.findActive(moduleId, externalId)
+  if (!row || row.hidden) return null
+  return { ...publicTeam(row), id: row.id, externalId: row.external_id, moduleId: row.module_id, ...(await syncStatus()) }
+}
+
+async function rosterPublic(slug, viewer = null) {
+  const row = await teamsDb.findBySlug(slug)
+  if (!row || row.hidden) return null
+  const [members, sync] = await Promise.all([
+    access.rosterWithOverrides(row.id),
+    syncStatus(),
+  ])
+
+  // The module gets the rows as it supplied them — this is its own data coming
+  // home — plus who is asking, which is all a rung decision needs.
+  const answer = await teamProvider.projectRoster(row.external_id, members, viewer)
+  let visible
+  if (answer.ok) visible = members.filter((m) => answer.members.includes(m.member_key))
+  else if (answer.projects) visible = [] // fail closed: it has rungs and we could not ask
+  else visible = members                 // nothing to fail closed ABOUT
+
+  return {
+    members: visible.map(publicMember),
+    ...sync,
+    rosterSyncedAt: row.roster_synced_at,
+    // Stated rather than implied. An empty roster has three quite different
+    // causes — a Team with no members, a rung that shows none, and a module that
+    // could not be asked — and a page that cannot tell them apart will report the
+    // last one as the first.
+    projected: answer.ok,
+    ...(answer.ok || !answer.projects ? {} : { projectionUnavailable: true }),
+  }
+}
+
+// ── Player ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * The caller's Teams — membership and grants — each with the REASON it is listed.
+ *
+ * The two are read from their own tables and merged here rather than by a query
+ * that unions them, so the reason survives into the payload. `both` is a real
+ * state and the UI needs it: a member who also holds a historical grant should
+ * see membership as the current reason without the grant vanishing.
+ *
+ * A hidden Team IS listed here. Suppression is a public-surface rule; a member is
+ * not a member of the public.
+ */
+async function listForUser(userId) {
+  const memberships = await teamsDb.activeTeamsForUser(userId)
+  const byId = new Map()
+
+  for (const row of memberships) {
+    byId.set(row.id, { ...publicTeam(row), reason: 'membership', isLeader: Boolean(row.is_leader) })
+  }
+
+  // Grants are per Team, so the visible set is walked rather than queried the
+  // other way round; the population is small (a user's Teams), and it keeps path
+  // 3's read on path 3's table.
+  const all = await teamsDb.allActive()
+  for (const row of all) {
+    // eslint-disable-next-line no-await-in-loop
+    const resolved = await access.forumAccess(row.id, userId)
+    if (!resolved.viaGrant) continue
+    const existing = byId.get(row.id)
+    if (existing) existing.reason = 'both'
+    else byId.set(row.id, { ...publicTeam(row), reason: 'grant', isLeader: false })
+  }
+
+  return { teams: [...byId.values()], ...(await syncStatus()) }
+}
+
+/** The caller's own resolved access on one Team. */
+async function accessForUser(slug, userId) {
+  const row = await teamsDb.findBySlug(slug)
+  if (!row) return null
+  const resolved = await access.forumAccess(row.id, userId)
+  return { slug: row.slug, ...resolved }
+}
+
+// ── Admin ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+async function listAdmin({ includeArchived = false } = {}) {
+  const moduleId = teamProvider.providerModuleId()
+  const rows = await teamsDb.allActive()
+  const sync = await syncStatus()
+  const state = moduleId ? await teamsDb.syncState(moduleId) : null
+  return {
+    teams: rows.map(adminTeam),
+    ...sync,
+    // Shown verbatim on Admin → Teams, including the last error: an operator
+    // debugging a stale projection needs what the provider actually said.
+    syncState: state
+      ? {
+        moduleId: state.module_id,
+        lastAttemptAt: state.last_attempt_at,
+        lastSuccessAt: state.last_success_at,
+        consecutiveFailures: state.consecutive_failures,
+        lastError: state.last_error,
+        pendingEmptySince: state.pending_empty_since,
+      }
+      : null,
+    includeArchived,
+  }
+}
+
+async function getAdmin(id) {
+  const row = await teamsDb.findById(id)
+  if (!row) return null
+  const [members, grants, pending] = await Promise.all([
+    access.rosterWithOverrides(row.id, { includeDeparted: true }),
+    access.grantLedger(row.id),
+    // eslint-disable-next-line global-require
+    require('./teamModeration.model').pendingForTeam(row.id),
+  ])
+  return {
+    ...adminTeam(row),
+    members: members.map(adminMember),
+    grants,
+    pendingRequests: pending,
+  }
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  listPublic,
+  getPublic,
+  getPublicByExternalId,
+  rosterPublic,
+  listForUser,
+  accessForUser,
+  listAdmin,
+  getAdmin,
+  syncStatus,
+  publicTeam,
+  publicMember,
+  adminTeam,
+  adminMember,
+  STALE_INTERVALS,
+}

server/src/modules/lifecycle.js

@@ -31,6 +31,33 @@ const log = require('../utils/logger')('modules')
 // such budget on purpose — it delays the listener binding, which is the feature.
 const SHUTDOWN_BUDGET_MS = 5000
 
+/**
+ * Nudge the bot to re-pull the slash-command set, from the two places that
+ * actually change it in a live process: a boot, and an operator disabling a
+ * module (which `remove` and `purge` both run through).
+ *
+ * Enabling and installing are deliberately NOT here — both ask for a restart
+ * before the module runs, and a command whose handler is not registered yet is a
+ * command that would answer "unknown". The nudge follows the state, not the
+ * intention.
+ *
+ * Required lazily, and deliberately NOT awaited by either caller: the bot is
+ * optional infrastructure, and neither a boot nor an operator's disable should
+ * wait out `botInternalClient`'s 4s timeout because a bot container is wedged.
+ * Nothing here throws — a failed nudge is a log line, and the bot re-pulls on its
+ * next `ready` regardless.
+ */
+async function nudgeBot(why) {
+  try {
+    // eslint-disable-next-line global-require
+    const bot = require('../utils/botInternalClient')
+    const res = await bot.refreshCommands()
+    if (!res.ok) log.info('bot did not take the slash-command nudge', { why, error: res.error })
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.warn('slash-command nudge failed', { why, message: err.message })
+  }
+}
+
 /**
  * Run one database call for one module without letting it become everyone's
  * failure. Returns null on failure, having logged it.
@@ -170,6 +197,23 @@ async function boot({ modules, model } = {}) {
       })
     }
   }
+
+  // The Team reconciler's boot trigger (TEAMS.md §2.4), last — after every module
+  // has started, because the provider is registered by a module and a module that
+  // warms a cache in onBoot must be allowed to finish before it is asked anything.
+  //
+  // `safe` for the same reason every step above uses it: an unreachable provider
+  // is a stale projection, never a site that will not start.
+  // eslint-disable-next-line global-require
+  await safe('starting the team reconciler', () => require('../model/teams/teamSync.model').start())
+
+  // Tell the bot the slash-command set may have moved (TEAMS.md §7.1).
+  //
+  // The bot pulls on its own `ready` too, so this is not the only path — it is
+  // the path for the case `ready` does not cover: the APP restarting while the
+  // bot stays connected, which is every ordinary redeploy. Without it, a module
+  // added in that deploy has no command until someone restarts the bot.
+  nudgeBot('boot')
 }
 
 /** Reject if `fn`'s promise has not settled within `ms`. */
@@ -271,6 +315,7 @@ async function stop(id, { modules, model, budgetMs = SHUTDOWN_BUDGET_MS } = {})
   }
 
   await safe(`disabling module "${id}"`, () => rows.disable(id))
+  nudgeBot(`disable:${id}`)
   return { stopped, error }
 }
 

server/src/modules/loader.js

@@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ function buildCtx(id, moduleRoot) {
   const uploads = require('../router/v1/admin/imageUpload')
   const activity = require('../model/activity/activity.model')
   const users = require('../model/users/users.model')
+  const teams = require('../model/teams/teamSync.model')
+  const teamActivity = require('../model/teams/teamActivity.model')
   const { makeLimiter, accountChangeLimiter } = require('../middleware/rateLimit')
   /* eslint-enable global-require */
 
@@ -174,6 +176,37 @@ function buildCtx(id, moduleRoot) {
     // a place nobody looks. `list` stays core's: reading the log is the admin
     // panel's job, and it spans every actor.
     activity: { log: activity.log },
+    // Teams (API 1.6.0, TEAMS.md §2.3). Push, to the pull the provider answers.
+    //
+    // Both are fire-and-forget by contract. `publish` is an OPTIMISATION — it
+    // makes a membership change visible at once — and `reconcile` is a REQUEST,
+    // debounced and never awaited, so a module cannot make its own call site slow
+    // or turn a background failure into its own error. Correctness comes from the
+    // reconciler either way; these only decide how soon.
+    //
+    // There is deliberately no reader here. A module answers questions about
+    // Teams; it does not ask them. Every Team table is core-internal (§10.3), and
+    // a `getTeamRoster` on ctx would be core offering to read back the module's
+    // own answer — which is the module's data, in the module's own store.
+    teams: {
+      publish: (event) => teams.publish(event),
+      reconcile: (opts) => teams.request(opts),
+      // §4's activity feed (phase 3). `source` is bound to the CALLING module and
+      // is never taken from the item — a module writes its own items, under its
+      // own name, and items name their Team by the module's own `externalId`, so
+      // there is no id a module could send that reaches another module's Team.
+      //
+      // Like `publish` and `reconcile` above, a failure here never reaches the
+      // module: this is called from inside a game-event handler, and a storage
+      // problem of core's must not become the module's control flow. A rejected
+      // write is logged and the promise still resolves.
+      activity: {
+        push: (items) => teamActivity.push(id, items).then(
+          (stored) => { void stored },
+          (err) => { log.error('ctx.teams.activity.push failed', { module: id, message: err.message }) },
+        ),
+      },
+    },
     // One function, for one caller: the `admin.users.detail` slot router needs
     // the user its prefix names. Narrowed like `ctx.posts` — the users model
     // exports creation, role changes and password handling, none of which is a
@@ -240,6 +273,26 @@ function buildApi(record) {
       record.staged.registerNotificationStreams(streams)
     },
     registerAnnounceLeg: record.staged.registerAnnounceLeg,
+    // The Team provider (API 1.6.0, TEAMS.md §2.3). Unlike every registration
+    // above, this one is core CALLING THE MODULE and waiting for an answer — the
+    // same direction registerAnnounceLeg's dispatch already goes, which is why it
+    // is modelled on it rather than invented. `once` because a module registering
+    // twice means two answers to a question that has one.
+    registerTeamProvider(provider) {
+      once('registerTeamProvider')
+      record.staged.registerTeamProvider(provider)
+    },
+    // Chat-platform slash commands (API 1.6.0, §7.1), live since phase 7. Like
+    // registerTeamProvider above, the handler this stages is core CALLING THE
+    // MODULE and waiting for an answer — but from further away than any other
+    // member: the caller is a bot in another container, holding a Discord
+    // interaction open on a deadline. `once` for the same reason the two
+    // registries above take it — a second call is a module changing its mind
+    // halfway through register(), not adding to what it already said.
+    registerSlashCommands(commands) {
+      once('registerSlashCommands')
+      record.staged.registerSlashCommands(commands)
+    },
     // The two lifecycle hooks (§2.5). Registered here, dispatched from
     // lifecycle.js — this file runs with no database and the hooks run with one.
     // Both are optional: a module with no warm-up and nothing to close simply

server/src/modules/registries.js

@@ -58,6 +58,28 @@ const legs = new Map()
 // a collision with a name attached rather than a silently doubled side effect.
 const postHooks = new Map()
 
+// { owner, getTeams, getTeamMembers, getTeamLeaders } or null — the Team provider
+// (API 1.6.0, TEAMS.md §2.3).
+//
+// A SINGLE value rather than a Map, unlike every registry above it, and that is
+// the contract: one provider per deployment. Teams have one authoritative source
+// by construction — two modules answering "what teams exist" would produce two
+// disjoint sets under one `teams` table with no rule for merging them, so a
+// second registration is a collision rather than an addition.
+let teamProvider = null
+
+// command name → { owner, name, description, options, access, handler }. Slash
+// commands a registrant has published for the chat platform (API 1.6.0,
+// TEAMS.md §7.1).
+//
+// The DEFINITION and the HANDLER are registered together and the handler runs
+// HERE, in the website process; the bot pulls the definitions over the internal
+// API and owns every Discord-specific concern. That split is forced — the bot
+// container has no `modules` volume, so a module physically cannot put a handler
+// in it (§0.4) — and it is also the boundary we would pick anyway: a module
+// calling `interaction.deferReply()` would be a module holding a Discord handle.
+const slashCommands = new Map()
+
 let coreRegistered = false
 
 // Stream ids that predate the module system and may not carry their owner's
@@ -196,6 +218,31 @@ const announceLegIds = () => [...legs.keys()]
 /** One leg, or null. */
 const announceLeg = (leg) => legs.get(leg) || null
 
+// ── Team provider (TEAMS.md §2.3) ──────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/** The registered provider, or null when no module supplies one. */
+const registeredTeamProvider = () => teamProvider
+
+/** Is there a Team provider at all? Read by the reconciler and the read API. */
+const hasTeamProvider = () => teamProvider !== null
+
+// ── Slash commands (TEAMS.md §7.1) ─────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * Every registered command WITHOUT its handler — what `/internal/commands`
+ * serves to the bot.
+ *
+ * The handler is stripped rather than merely un-serialisable-and-ignored: this
+ * is the object that crosses a process boundary, and the definition half is the
+ * whole of what the bot is allowed to know. `owner` rides along so the bot can
+ * name the module in a collision warning.
+ */
+const slashCommandDefinitions = () =>
+  [...slashCommands.values()].map(({ handler, ...definition }) => definition)
+
+/** One command, handler included. The dispatcher's lookup. */
+const slashCommand = (name) => slashCommands.get(name) || null
+
 // ── Shape checks, run the moment a registrant calls ────────────────────────
 //
 // Split from the collision checks below on the same line PR 3 drew through
@@ -225,6 +272,166 @@ function checkLegShape(entry) {
   return { leg, label: label || leg, dispatch, classify }
 }
 
+// Three methods are REQUIRED, with no optional half. A provider that could list
+// Teams but not their members would leave core holding Teams it can never
+// populate, and the reconciler has no sensible behaviour for that — it is not the
+// same as a call that fails, which is staleness and already handled (§2.4). A
+// module unable to answer one of the three answers `{ ok: false }` at call time.
+//
+// `projectRoster` is the fourth and is OPTIONAL (TEAMS.md §3.3): it expresses an
+// audience model, and a module with no rung system of its own has no opinion to
+// express. Omitting it means core serves rosters at its own public shape;
+// implementing it means core fails CLOSED when the call cannot be made, so this
+// is a member to add deliberately rather than by habit.
+//
+// `pageUrlTemplate` is the fifth, also OPTIONAL, and is data rather than a method
+// — see its own comment below. A module that omits it costs its deployment
+// clickable links in Team notification email and nothing else.
+//
+// The copy is explicit rather than a spread: this object is what core calls, so
+// anything not named here is not part of the contract and must not survive
+// registration. A method that silently rode along would look implemented from the
+// module's side and be invisible from core's.
+function checkTeamProviderShape(entry) {
+  const provider = entry || {}
+  const out = {}
+  for (const name of ['getTeams', 'getTeamMembers', 'getTeamLeaders']) {
+    if (typeof provider[name] !== 'function') {
+      throw new Error(`registerTeamProvider: ${name}() is missing or not a function`)
+    }
+    out[name] = provider[name]
+  }
+  if (provider.projectRoster !== undefined) {
+    if (typeof provider.projectRoster !== 'function') {
+      throw new Error('registerTeamProvider: projectRoster must be a function if present')
+    }
+    out.projectRoster = provider.projectRoster
+  }
+  if (provider.pageUrlTemplate !== undefined) {
+    out.pageUrlTemplate = checkPageUrlTemplate(provider.pageUrlTemplate)
+  }
+  return out
+}
+
+// `pageUrlTemplate` is the fifth member and OPTIONAL (TEAMS.md §6.4, phase 6).
+//
+// **Why a module has to supply this at all.** Teams are a contract primitive with
+// no core surface: core owns the tables and the access rules, and the MODULE owns
+// the page, because core does not own the word for a Team. That is settled and
+// right — but it leaves core unable to write a link to one, and a notification
+// email that cannot link to the thread it is about is most of the way to useless.
+// So the module that owns the page says where it is.
+//
+// **A template, not a callback.** Core substitutes `{externalId}` and `{slug}`
+// into a relative path and does nothing else with it. A function would be a
+// module hook on the mail path — one more thing that can hang or throw between a
+// forum reply and the mail about it — to produce a string that never varies.
+//
+// Validated hard, because the output goes into an email as a link. Relative only:
+// a template naming its own host would let a module redirect the site's outbound
+// mail somewhere else, and there is no reason for one to.
+// One leading slash, and the second character may not be another. `//evil.test/x`
+// passes an "is it rooted" check and is a PROTOCOL-RELATIVE url — core prefixing
+// its own base makes it harmless today, but a template is a string that ends up
+// in an href sooner or later, and this is a character class rather than a
+// judgement call about who concatenates it.
+const PAGE_URL_TEMPLATE = /^\/(?!\/)[A-Za-z0-9\-._~/{}]*$/
+
+function checkPageUrlTemplate(value) {
+  if (typeof value !== 'string' || !PAGE_URL_TEMPLATE.test(value)) {
+    throw new Error(`registerTeamProvider: pageUrlTemplate must be a relative path, got "${value}"`)
+  }
+  return value
+}
+
+// A slash command's name and description are validated HERE and not only at the
+// bot, for a reason worth stating: the bot registers the whole set in a single
+// `REST.put(applicationGuildCommands)`, so ONE malformed definition is rejected
+// by Discord as a batch and takes every other command down with it — including
+// the bot's own. A definition that cannot be registered must therefore fail at
+// `register()`, where it belongs to a module that can be named and marked
+// failed, rather than at the next `ready` where it looks like the bot is broken.
+//
+// **Commands are NOT namespaced under their owner, unlike every other id in this
+// file.** Discord's name grammar has no `.` in it, so `uo.guild` is unregistrable
+// and the prefix rule cannot be expressed. Collisions are caught by first-come
+// instead, with the holder named — and the bot resolves the one collision core
+// cannot see (a pulled name against its own built-ins) in the module's disfavour.
+const SLASH_NAME = /^[a-z0-9_-]{1,32}$/
+const SLASH_ACCESS = ['everyone', 'linked', 'staff']
+
+// §7.1.1: `string | integer | boolean | user`, and deliberately nothing else. No
+// subcommand groups, autocomplete, attachments, modals or component
+// interactions. Those are exactly the features whose semantics do not survive a
+// second platform, and admitting one here is how Discord specifics leak into a
+// platform-agnostic registration API by accident.
+const SLASH_OPTION_TYPES = ['string', 'integer', 'boolean', 'user']
+
+function checkSlashOption(command, option) {
+  const { name, type, description, required, choices } = option || {}
+  const where = `registerSlashCommands: ${command}`
+  if (!SLASH_NAME.test(name || '')) throw new Error(`${where}: bad option name "${name}"`)
+  if (!SLASH_OPTION_TYPES.includes(type)) {
+    throw new Error(`${where}: option "${name}" has unsupported type "${type}" (§7.1.1)`)
+  }
+  if (!description || description.length > 100) {
+    throw new Error(`${where}: option "${name}" needs a description of 1-100 characters`)
+  }
+  const out = { name, type, description, required: Boolean(required) }
+  if (choices !== undefined) {
+    if (!Array.isArray(choices) || !choices.length) {
+      throw new Error(`${where}: option "${name}" has an empty choices list`)
+    }
+    // Only the two option types Discord itself allows choices on. `boolean` is
+    // already a two-value choice and `user` is a picker; a choices list on
+    // either is a misunderstanding worth failing rather than dropping.
+    if (type !== 'string' && type !== 'integer') {
+      throw new Error(`${where}: option "${name}" is ${type}; choices need string or integer`)
+    }
+    out.choices = choices.map((c) => {
+      if (!c || !c.name || c.value === undefined) {
+        throw new Error(`${where}: option "${name}" has a choice with no name/value`)
+      }
+      return { name: String(c.name), value: c.value }
+    })
+  }
+  return out
+}
+
+/**
+ * `registerSlashCommands([{ name, description, options, access, handler }])`.
+ *
+ * `access` is enforced TWICE and this copy is not the gate: the bot sets
+ * Discord-side default member permissions from it where it can, and the
+ * dispatcher re-checks it on every call. Client-side is about not advertising a
+ * dead end; the server is the boundary — the same principle the nav follows.
+ */
+function checkSlashCommandShape(entry) {
+  const { name, description, options, access, handler } = entry || {}
+  if (!SLASH_NAME.test(name || '')) {
+    throw new Error(`registerSlashCommands: bad command name "${name}" (lowercase, 1-32, no dots)`)
+  }
+  if (!description || description.length > 100) {
+    throw new Error(`registerSlashCommands: ${name} needs a description of 1-100 characters`)
+  }
+  if (typeof handler !== 'function') throw new Error(`registerSlashCommands: ${name} has no handler()`)
+  if (access !== undefined && !SLASH_ACCESS.includes(access)) {
+    throw new Error(`registerSlashCommands: ${name} has unknown access "${access}"`)
+  }
+  if (options !== undefined && !Array.isArray(options)) {
+    throw new Error(`registerSlashCommands: ${name} options must be an array`)
+  }
+  const checked = (options || []).map((o) => checkSlashOption(name, o))
+  // Discord rejects a definition that puts an optional option before a required
+  // one, and does it for the whole batch. Sorting silently would change what the
+  // module wrote; this is the module's own ordering bug and it gets its name.
+  const firstOptional = checked.findIndex((o) => !o.required)
+  if (firstOptional !== -1 && checked.slice(firstOptional).some((o) => o.required)) {
+    throw new Error(`registerSlashCommands: ${name} lists a required option after an optional one`)
+  }
+  return { name, description, options: checked, access: access || 'everyone', handler }
+}
+
 /**
  * `registerPostHook({ onSaved, onDeleted })` — both optional, at least one
  * required. A registration with neither is a subscription that can never fire,
@@ -265,7 +472,9 @@ function checkExtensionShape(slot, router, specFile) {
  * `allStreams()` / `announceLeg()` / the slot routers until `apply()`.
  */
 function stage(owner) {
-  const staged = { owner, streams: [], legs: [], extensions: [], postHooks: [] }
+  const staged = {
+    owner, streams: [], legs: [], extensions: [], postHooks: [], teamProviders: [], slashCommands: [],
+  }
   return {
     staged,
     registerNotificationStreams(entries) {
@@ -281,6 +490,13 @@ function stage(owner) {
     registerPostHook(entry) {
       staged.postHooks.push(checkPostHookShape(entry))
     },
+    registerTeamProvider(entry) {
+      staged.teamProviders.push(checkTeamProviderShape(entry))
+    },
+    registerSlashCommands(entries) {
+      if (!Array.isArray(entries)) throw new Error('registerSlashCommands: expected an array')
+      for (const e of entries) staged.slashCommands.push(checkSlashCommandShape(e))
+    },
   }
 }
 
@@ -293,7 +509,15 @@ function stage(owner) {
  * PR 2 learned to protect (mounting inside the scan loop made every collision
  * look like it was with core).
  */
-function apply({ owner, streams: newStreams, legs: newLegs, extensions: newExtensions, postHooks: newPostHooks = [] }) {
+function apply({
+  owner,
+  streams: newStreams,
+  legs: newLegs,
+  extensions: newExtensions,
+  postHooks: newPostHooks = [],
+  teamProviders: newTeamProviders = [],
+  slashCommands: newSlashCommands = [],
+}) {
   // ── validate ──
   const seenStreams = new Set()
   for (const s of newStreams) {
@@ -332,6 +556,19 @@ function apply({ owner, streams: newStreams, legs: newLegs, extensions: newExten
     throw new Error(`"${owner}" already registered a post hook`)
   }
 
+  if (newTeamProviders.length > 1) throw new Error(`"${owner}" registered more than one team provider`)
+  if (newTeamProviders.length && teamProvider) {
+    throw new Error(`a team provider is already registered by "${teamProvider.owner}"`)
+  }
+
+  const seenCommands = new Set()
+  for (const c of newSlashCommands) {
+    const held = slashCommands.get(c.name)
+    if (held) throw new Error(`slash command "/${c.name}" is already registered by "${held.owner}"`)
+    if (seenCommands.has(c.name)) throw new Error(`slash command "/${c.name}" registered twice`)
+    seenCommands.add(c.name)
+  }
+
   // ── commit — nothing below can fail ──
   for (const s of newStreams) {
     streamOwners.set(s.id, owner)
@@ -345,6 +582,8 @@ function apply({ owner, streams: newStreams, legs: newLegs, extensions: newExten
     entry.router.use(x.router)
   }
   for (const h of newPostHooks) postHooks.set(owner, h)
+  for (const p of newTeamProviders) teamProvider = { owner, ...p }
+  for (const c of newSlashCommands) slashCommands.set(c.name, { owner, ...c })
 }
 
 // ── Core's own registrations ───────────────────────────────────────────────
@@ -410,6 +649,8 @@ function _reset() {
   streamOwners.clear()
   legs.clear()
   postHooks.clear()
+  teamProvider = null
+  slashCommands.clear()
   coreRegistered = false
 }
 
@@ -427,6 +668,10 @@ module.exports = {
   announceLeg,
   postHookEntries,
   dispatchPostHook,
+  registeredTeamProvider,
+  hasTeamProvider,
+  slashCommandDefinitions,
+  slashCommand,
   stage,
   apply,
   registerCore,

server/src/modules/version.js

@@ -9,6 +9,20 @@
 // Deliberately separate from PROTOCOL_VERSION (which versions the shard wire and
 // has nothing to say about a website module) and from any module's own version.
 
+// 1.6.0 — the Team surface (docs/website/TEAMS.md Part 11). Additions only, so
+// minor: `api.registerTeamProvider({ getTeams, getTeamMembers, getTeamLeaders })`,
+// `ctx.teams.publish(event)`, `ctx.teams.reconcile({ reason })`,
+// `ctx.teams.activity.push(items)`, `api.registerSlashCommands([...])`, and the
+// client slots `team.overview` / `team.member.row`. module-uo's `coreApi:
+// "^1.3.0"` still resolves.
+//
+// **The number covers the whole surface; the members arrived by phase, and all of
+// them have now arrived.** `activity.push` landed with the Team activity feed
+// (§4, phase 3) and `registerSlashCommands` with the Discord commands (§7.1,
+// phase 7); until each did, it was present and THREW rather than being absent or,
+// worse, silently accepting data into a table that did not exist. Nothing in
+// 1.6.0 throws any more.
+//
 // 1.5.0 — a CLIENT addition: `PublicLayout` takes an optional `shell` prop that
 // renders the page body wrapper core's own pages write by hand (MODULE_API.md
 // §3.4). Minor, not major: §3.4 makes *changing* a kit component's props a major
@@ -44,6 +58,6 @@
 // an admin action a module performs belongs in core's one audit log, the
 // extension slot needs the user its prefix names, and §2.7 forbids a module
 // reading core's `APP_BASE_URL` for itself. Additions only, so minor.
-const MODULE_API_VERSION = '1.5.0'
+const MODULE_API_VERSION = '1.6.0'
 
 module.exports = { MODULE_API_VERSION }

server/src/router/v1/admin/admin.controller.js

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ const trustedDevices = require('../../../model/trustedDevices/trustedDevices.mod
 const recoveryCodes = require('../../../model/recoveryCodes/recoveryCodes.model')
 const registries = require('../../../modules/registries')
 const announceJobs = require('../../../model/announceJobs/announceJobs.model')
+const forumSettings = require('../../../model/teams/teamForumSettings.model')
 const pushDispatch = require('../../../utils/pushDispatch')
 const { cleanBody } = require('../../../utils/sanitizeHtml')
 const { parseJsonSetting } = require('../../../utils/settingsJson')
@@ -589,8 +590,64 @@ async function updateSettings(req, res) {
     if (!check.ok) return res.status(400).json({ message: check.message })
     updates[key] = JSON.stringify(resolveNavOverrides(parsed, key))
   }
+  // The Team-forum controls (TEAMS.md §5.5). Two enum keys and one PRECONDITION —
+  // the only key on this endpoint whose write depends on something other than its
+  // own value. `acknowledge` is a request field, not a setting: it is consumed
+  // here and never stored, because what gets stored is the text VERSION the
+  // operator accepted, written by recordAck() below.
+  if (forumSettings.ENABLED_KEY in updates) {
+    const v = updates[forumSettings.ENABLED_KEY]
+    if (v !== '0' && v !== '1' && v !== true && v !== false) {
+      return res.status(400).json({ message: 'Invalid teams_forums_enabled value' })
+    }
+    updates[forumSettings.ENABLED_KEY] = v === true || v === '1' ? '1' : '0'
+  }
+  const nextImageMode = updates[forumSettings.IMAGES_KEY]
+  if (forumSettings.IMAGES_KEY in updates) {
+    if (!forumSettings.IMAGE_MODES.includes(nextImageMode)) {
+      return res.status(400).json({ message: 'Invalid teams_forum_images value' })
+    }
+    // THE GATE (§5.5.5). Server-side, and rejected 400 with the admin UI's
+    // checkbox bypassed — a checkbox is how the gate is presented, never the gate.
+    const gate = await forumSettings.assertAcknowledged(nextImageMode, req.body.acknowledge)
+    if (!gate.ok) return res.status(gate.status).json({ message: gate.error })
+  }
+  if (forumSettings.EDIT_WINDOW_KEY in updates) {
+    // The post edit window (phase 5). An ordinary key with a range, validated
+    // here rather than left to the model's read-side clamp: a read that silently
+    // coerces a nonsense value back to the default is right for a hand-edited
+    // row and wrong for an admin who just typed one, who should be told.
+    const raw = updates[forumSettings.EDIT_WINDOW_KEY]
+    const n = Number(raw)
+    if (!Number.isInteger(n) || n < 0 || n > forumSettings.EDIT_WINDOW_MAX) {
+      return res.status(400).json({
+        message: `teams_forum_edit_window_minutes must be a whole number of minutes between 0 and ${forumSettings.EDIT_WINDOW_MAX}`,
+      })
+    }
+    updates[forumSettings.EDIT_WINDOW_KEY] = String(n)
+  }
+  {
+    // The stale-acknowledgement lock: a reworded notice freezes the forum
+    // settings until it is re-given, and does NOT turn uploads off (§5.5.5).
+    const writable = await forumSettings.assertSettingsWritable(Object.keys(updates), req.body.acknowledge)
+    if (!writable.ok) return res.status(writable.status).json({ message: writable.error })
+  }
+  const acknowledging = String(req.body.acknowledge ?? '') === forumSettings.ACK_VERSION
+  delete updates.acknowledge
   try {
     await settings.setMany(updates, req.user.id)
+    if (acknowledging && (nextImageMode === 'uploads' || forumSettings.IMAGES_KEY in updates)) {
+      // Recorded, not merely displayed: `updated_by`/`updated_at` come from the
+      // settings schema, and the activity_log row puts it in the staff audit trail
+      // with the acting admin's IP alongside every other consequential action.
+      await forumSettings.recordAck(req.user.id)
+      await activity.log({
+        req,
+        action: 'team.forum.uploads.acknowledged',
+        detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) acknowledged the image-upload notice `
+          + `(version ${forumSettings.ACK_VERSION})`,
+      })
+    }
     // The HTML shell is templated from brand_assets and theme_visual, and is
     // cached per process (utils/htmlShell.js) — a write that can change it has
     // to say so, or the favicon an admin just uploaded appears only after the

server/src/router/v1/admin/index.js

@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ const emailRouter = require('./email.router')
 const discordBotRouter = require('./discordBot.router')
 const settingsRouter = require('./settings.router')
 const modulesRouter = require('./modules.router')
+const teamsRouter = require('./teams.router')
+const teamsVoiceRouter = require('./teamsVoice.router')
 const dashboardRouter = require('./dashboard.router')
 
 const adminRouter = express.Router()
@@ -79,6 +81,21 @@ adminRouter.use('/settings', settingsRouter)
 // here alongside the other configuration capabilities, and admin-only per route
 // rather than at this line, so the gate sits next to what it is guarding.
 adminRouter.use('/modules', modulesRouter)
+// Teams. Staff-wide, like /activity: a moderator runs the reserved-name review
+// queue. The three actions that PUBLISH untrusted game-sourced strings are gated
+// per request inside the controller, not per route — a moderator may call them,
+// and calling them files a request rather than applying one (TEAMS.md §2.9).
+// Voice channels (TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9) are mounted at the more specific prefix
+// FIRST, so /teams/voice/* never reaches the teams router's `/:id`.
+//
+// They live out here rather than inside `teams.router.js` beside the bridge they
+// belong with, for a mechanical reason worth recording: that file sits exactly at
+// swagger-autogen's per-file limit. At twenty `teamsRouter.*` statements
+// `npm run swagger` dies with "invalid array length — heap out of memory"; at
+// nineteen it generates. One more statement of any shape tips it, a mount
+// included, so the mount is here and the file keeps its nineteen.
+adminRouter.use('/teams/voice', teamsVoiceRouter)
+adminRouter.use('/teams', teamsRouter)
 
 // The two singletons that own no path segment of their own: GET /dashboard and
 // PUT /site-mode. Mounted at the group root, last, exactly where the residual

server/src/router/v1/admin/moderation.controller.js

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ const moderation = require('../../../model/moderation/moderation.model')
 const modNotes = require('../../../model/modNotes/modNotes.model')
 const modNotesDb = require('../../../model/modNotes/modNotes.db')
 const appeals = require('../../../model/appeals/appeals.model')
+const contentReports = require('../../../model/reports/contentReports.model')
 const { isTerminal, isAppealableType, reversalStatusFor } = require('../../../model/appeals/appeals.pure')
 const botInternalClient = require('../../../utils/botInternalClient')
 const activity = require('../../../model/activity/activity.model')
@@ -295,6 +296,68 @@ async function getUserAppeals(req, res) {
   }
 }
 
+// ── Content reports (TEAMS.md §5.6) ───────────────────────────────────────
+//
+// Mounted here rather than under Teams, and that placement is the design: a
+// staffer working a queue should have one place to work, and a report about a
+// forum post is the same job as a report about anything else. `target_type` is a
+// VARCHAR precisely so the next consumer — a wiki page, a news comment — arrives
+// as a value in this same queue and not as a second screen.
+//
+// **This is the only view of the queue that exists.** Team leaders have no
+// report-facing surface at all, because the gap §5.6 closes is that a Team's
+// leaders are exactly the people who will not report their own Team. Org lead,
+// 2026-08-18: reports are site administration only.
+
+async function getContentReports(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const { limit, offset } = pageParams(req)
+    const status = typeof req.query.status === 'string' ? req.query.status : undefined
+    if (status && status !== 'all' && !contentReports.STATUSES.includes(status)) {
+      return res.status(400).json({ message: 'Unknown report status' })
+    }
+    const teamId = Number(req.query.teamId) || undefined
+    return res.json({
+      reports: await contentReports.queue({ status, teamId, limit, offset }),
+      openCount: await contentReports.openCount(),
+    })
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.error('getContentReports failed', { error: err.message })
+    return res.status(500).json({ message: 'Internal Server Error' })
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Move a report along the queue.
+ *
+ * Every transition writes `activity_log`, including `dismissed` — especially
+ * `dismissed`. A queue where acting is audited and declining to act is not is one
+ * where the cheapest way to make a report disappear leaves no trace, and the
+ * reports most worth auditing are exactly the ones somebody wanted gone.
+ */
+async function handleContentReport(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const result = await contentReports.handle({
+      id: Number(req.params.id),
+      actor: req.user,
+      status: req.body.status,
+      note: req.body.note,
+    })
+    if (!result.ok) return res.status(result.status || 400).json({ message: result.error })
+
+    await activity.log({
+      req,
+      action: 'moderation.report.handle',
+      detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) set report #${req.params.id} to ${req.body.status}`
+        + `${req.body.note ? `: "${req.body.note}"` : ''}`,
+    })
+    return res.json(result.report)
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.error('handleContentReport failed', { error: err.message })
+    return res.status(500).json({ message: 'Internal Server Error' })
+  }
+}
+
 module.exports = {
   getSummary,
   getRecent,
@@ -311,4 +374,6 @@ module.exports = {
   claimAppeal,
   resolveAppeal,
   getUserAppeals,
+  getContentReports,
+  handleContentReport,
 }

server/src/router/v1/admin/moderation.router.js

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-// Admin · Moderation — the moderation dashboard and the appeals queue.
+// Admin · Moderation — the moderation dashboard, the appeals queue and the
+// member-raised content-report queue (TEAMS.md §5.6).
 //
 // Mounted at /api/v1/admin/moderation by admin/index.js, which already applied
 // `noindex, isLoggedIn, staffOnly`. Read-only views over the Discord bot's
@@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ const express = require('express')
 const { body, param } = require('express-validator')
 
 const moderation = require('./moderation.controller')
+const contentReports = require('../../../model/reports/contentReports.model')
 const { requireRole } = require('../../../utils/auth')
 const validate = require('../../../middleware/validate')
 
@@ -171,4 +173,34 @@ moderationRouter.get(
   moderation.getUserAppeals,
 )
 
+// ── Content reports (TEAMS.md §5.6) ───────────────────────────────────────
+// Beside appeals rather than under Teams: a staffer working a queue should have
+// one place to work. There is no leader-facing counterpart to these two routes
+// and there is not meant to be — see the controller.
+moderationRouter.get(
+  '/reports',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Moderation']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'The member-raised content report queue'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Defaults to the open work (`open` + `reviewing`); filter with ?status=<open|reviewing|actioned|dismissed|all> and ?teamId=, page with ?limit&offset. Each row carries its TARGET already resolved — a post’s excerpt and author, a thread’s title, or an upload’s uploader, byte size and SNIFFED mimetype — so triage never means hunting for what was reported. A target that has since been hard-deleted comes back as null and the report still lists: "somebody reported this and by the time we looked it was gone" is a fact worth seeing.'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'The queue', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { reports: { type: 'array', items: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/ContentReport" } }, openCount: { type: 'integer' } } } } } } */
+  moderation.getContentReports,
+)
+moderationRouter.post(
+  '/reports/:id/handle',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Moderation']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Claim, action or dismiss a content report'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Handling a report is bookkeeping about the report, not moderation of the content — acting on the content itself is the ordinary forum moderation route, or a site-wide sanction against the account. Every transition writes activity_log, `dismissed` included: a queue where acting is audited and declining to act is not is one where the cheapest way to make a report vanish leaves no trace.'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Report id.' }
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', required: ['status'], properties: { status: { type: 'string', enum: ['open','reviewing','actioned','dismissed'] }, note: { type: 'string', maxLength: 500 } } } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'The updated report', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/ContentReport" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'Report not found', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }),
+  body('status').isIn(contentReports.STATUSES),
+  body('note').optional({ values: 'falsy' }).isString().trim().isLength({ max: 500 }),
+  validate,
+  moderation.handleContentReport,
+)
+
 module.exports = moderationRouter

server/src/router/v1/admin/teams.controller.js

@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+// Admin · Teams — the staff surface (TEAMS.md §2.11).
+//
+// The role split inside this file is the §2.9 gate, and it is enforced HERE
+// rather than in the router, because it is not a matter of which routes a role
+// may call: a moderator may call all of them, and three of them mean something
+// different when they do. `requestOrApply` is what decides, from the caller's
+// live role, whether an action applies or is filed for approval.
+
+const teams = require('../../../model/teams/teams.model')
+const moderation = require('../../../model/teams/teamModeration.model')
+const access = require('../../../model/teams/teamAccess.model')
+const teamSync = require('../../../model/teams/teamSync.model')
+const teamsDb = require('../../../model/teams/teams.db')
+const activity = require('../../../model/activity/activity.model')
+const forum = require('../../../model/teams/teamForum.model')
+const forumDb = require('../../../model/teams/teamForum.db')
+const forumUploadsModel = require('../../../model/teams/teamForumUploads.model')
+const forumSettings = require('../../../model/teams/teamForumSettings.model')
+const integration = require('../../../model/teams/teamIntegration.model')
+const voice = require('../../../model/teams/teamVoice.model')
+const voiceSettings = require('../../../model/teams/teamVoiceSettings.model')
+const voiceSync = require('../../../utils/teamVoiceSync')
+
+const log = require('../../../utils/logger')('teams')
+
+const fail = (res, err, what) => {
+  log.error(`admin teams: ${what} failed`, { message: err.message })
+  return res.status(500).json({ message: 'Internal Server Error' })
+}
+
+/** Translate a model result's { ok, status, error } into a response. */
+const send = (res, result, body = { ok: true }) =>
+  (result.ok ? res.json({ ...body, ...result }) : res.status(result.status || 400).json({ message: result.error }))
+
+async function listTeams(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return res.json(await teams.listAdmin({ includeArchived: req.query.archived === '1' }))
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'list')
+  }
+}
+
+async function getTeam(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const team = await teams.getAdmin(Number(req.params.id))
+    if (!team) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Team not found' })
+    return res.json(team)
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'get')
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The operator's escape hatch.
+ *
+ * Awaited rather than fire-and-forget: someone who pressed a button is owed the
+ * outcome, including the provider's error when it refused. `ctx.teams.reconcile()`
+ * is the debounced, unawaited path — this is not that.
+ */
+async function resync(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const result = await teamSync.reconcileNow('admin')
+    await activity.log({ req, action: 'team.resync', detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) ran a Team resync` })
+    return res.json(result)
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'resync')
+  }
+}
+
+async function archive(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const id = Number(req.params.id)
+    const team = await teamsDb.findById(id)
+    if (!team) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Team not found' })
+    await teamsDb.archiveTeam(id, 'staff')
+    await activity.log({
+      req,
+      action: 'team.archive',
+      detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) archived team "${team.name}" (#${id})`
+        + `${req.body.reason ? `: "${req.body.reason}"` : ''}`,
+    })
+    return res.json({ ok: true })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'archive')
+  }
+}
+
+async function grants(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return res.json({ grants: await access.grantLedger(Number(req.params.id)) })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'grants')
+  }
+}
+
+// ── Forum: the ledger and the upload attribution view (§5.4) ──────────────
+
+/**
+ * A Team's forum moderation ledger.
+ *
+ * Served whether or not the forum is switched on, unlike every /player forum
+ * route. The switch guards the forum as a FEATURE — what members can read and
+ * write — and an operator who turned it off to deal with a problem is precisely
+ * the operator who needs to see what was moderated (§5.5.1: no data is deleted).
+ */
+async function forumModeration(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const id = Number(req.params.id)
+    const team = await teamsDb.findById(id)
+    if (!team) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Team not found' })
+    return res.json({ entries: await forum.moderationLedger(id, { limit: 200 }) })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'forum moderation')
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Who uploaded what, when, and how much — across every Team.
+ *
+ * This view is the reason §5.5.4 added an attribution table at all: the
+ * acknowledgement an operator gives before enabling uploads is meaningless if the
+ * question it makes them responsible for cannot be answered afterwards.
+ */
+async function forumUploads(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return res.json({
+      uploads: await forumDb.listUploads({
+        limit: Number(req.query.limit) || 100,
+        offset: Number(req.query.offset) || 0,
+        includeDeleted: req.query.deleted === '1',
+      }),
+      quota: {
+        dailyBytes: forumUploadsModel.DAILY_QUOTA_BYTES,
+        retentionDays: forumUploadsModel.RETENTION_DAYS,
+      },
+    })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'forum uploads')
+  }
+}
+
+/** The forum settings' own state — the acknowledgement, which is not a public key. */
+async function forumSettingsState(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return res.json({
+      enabled: await forumSettings.forumsEnabled(),
+      imageMode: await forumSettings.imageMode(),
+      // Served here rather than published as a public setting: the client that
+      // needs the NUMBER is the settings screen, and the client that needs the
+      // DECISION already gets it per post as `canEdit`/`editableUntil`. Publishing
+      // the window would invite a client to compute the permission itself, which
+      // is the one thing a time-bounded permission must not let the bounded party
+      // do.
+      editWindowMinutes: await forumSettings.editWindowMinutes(),
+      editWindowMax: forumSettings.EDIT_WINDOW_MAX,
+      acknowledgement: await forumSettings.ackState(),
+    })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'forum settings')
+  }
+}
+
+// ── Leadership overrides (§2.5.1) — NOT gated ─────────────────────────────
+
+async function setLeaderOverride(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const id = Number(req.params.id)
+    const team = await teamsDb.findById(id)
+    if (!team) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Team not found' })
+
+    const { memberKey, effect, reason } = req.body
+    await access.setLeaderOverride({
+      teamId: id,
+      memberKey,
+      effect,
+      actorUserId: req.user.id,
+      actorUsername: req.user.username,
+      reason: reason || null,
+    })
+    await activity.log({
+      req,
+      action: 'team.leader.override',
+      detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) set a "${effect}" leadership override on `
+        + `${memberKey} in team "${team.name}" (#${id})${reason ? `: "${reason}"` : ''}`,
+    })
+    return res.json({ ok: true })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'leader-override')
+  }
+}
+
+async function clearLeaderOverride(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const id = Number(req.params.id)
+    const removed = await access.clearLeaderOverride(id, req.params.memberKey)
+    if (!removed) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'No such override' })
+    await activity.log({
+      req,
+      action: 'team.leader.override',
+      detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) cleared the leadership override on `
+        + `${req.params.memberKey} in team #${id}`,
+    })
+    return res.json({ ok: true })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'leader-override')
+  }
+}
+
+// ── The three gated actions, plus the ungated hide (§2.9) ─────────────────
+
+async function unhide(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return send(res, await moderation.requestOrApply({
+      req, actor: req.user, teamId: Number(req.params.id), action: 'unhide', reason: req.body.reason,
+    }))
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'unhide')
+  }
+}
+
+async function hide(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return send(res, await moderation.hide({
+      req, actor: req.user, teamId: Number(req.params.id), reason: req.body.reason,
+    }))
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'hide')
+  }
+}
+
+async function displayName(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const { displayName: value, reason } = req.body
+    // An empty string is how a UI says "clear it", and clearing is its own gated
+    // action rather than an override set to nothing — otherwise the audit line
+    // would read as though someone published a blank name.
+    const action = value ? 'display_name_override' : 'clear_display_name_override'
+    return send(res, await moderation.requestOrApply({
+      req, actor: req.user, teamId: Number(req.params.id), action, payload: { displayName: value || null }, reason,
+    }))
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'display-name')
+  }
+}
+
+async function reviewQueue(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return res.json({ teams: await moderation.reviewQueue() })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'review queue')
+  }
+}
+
+async function listRequests(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return res.json({ requests: await moderation.listRequests({ status: req.query.status || 'pending' }) })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'requests')
+  }
+}
+
+async function decideRequest(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return send(res, await moderation.decide({
+      req, actor: req.user, requestId: Number(req.params.id), status: req.body.status, note: req.body.note,
+    }))
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'decide')
+  }
+}
+
+// ── The integration bridge (§7.2, phase 8) — admin only ───────────────────
+//
+// Admin-only at the ROUTER, unlike everything above it. The §2.9 gate exists
+// because a moderator's action publishes untrusted game strings to the public
+// site; this is a different risk in the other direction — it decides that
+// members-only forum text leaves the site altogether, for a destination core
+// cannot see. That is a deployment-configuration decision, and it sits with the
+// role that holds the bot token rather than with the queue.
+
+async function integrationConfig(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return res.json({
+      platform: integration.DISCORD,
+      events: integration.BRIDGEABLE.map((id) => ({ id, membersOnly: integration.isMembersOnly(id) })),
+      rows: await integration.list(integration.DISCORD),
+    })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'integration config')
+  }
+}
+
+async function saveIntegrationConfig(req, res) {
+  try {
+    // `teamId` null is the deployment default and is a legitimate body, so the
+    // absent-vs-null distinction matters: a PUT with no teamId edits the default.
+    const teamId = req.body.teamId === undefined || req.body.teamId === null ? null : Number(req.body.teamId)
+    if (teamId !== null && !(await teamsDb.findById(teamId))) {
+      return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Team not found' })
+    }
+
+    const row = await integration.save(
+      {
+        platform: integration.DISCORD,
+        teamId,
+        events: req.body.events,
+        channelRef: req.body.channelRef,
+        enabled: req.body.enabled,
+        membersAck: req.body.membersAck,
+      },
+      req.user.id,
+    )
+
+    await activity.log({
+      req,
+      action: 'team.integration.save',
+      detail:
+        `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) saved the ${integration.DISCORD} bridge for ` +
+        `${teamId === null ? 'all Teams (default)' : `Team #${teamId}`}: ` +
+        `${row.enabled ? 'enabled' : 'disabled'}, events [${row.events.join(', ')}]` +
+        `${row.members_ack ? ', members-only destination acknowledged' : ''}`,
+    })
+
+    return res.json(row)
+  } catch (err) {
+    // A validation refusal carries its own status and its own wording — the
+    // acknowledgement message in particular is the whole explanation of why the
+    // save was refused, and collapsing it into a 500 would leave the operator
+    // with a screen that will not save and no reason given.
+    if (err.status) return res.status(err.status).json({ message: err.message, code: err.code })
+    return fail(res, err, 'save integration config')
+  }
+}
+
+async function deleteIntegrationConfig(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const teamId = req.params.teamId === 'default' ? null : Number(req.params.teamId)
+    const removed = await integration.remove(integration.DISCORD, teamId)
+    if (removed === 0) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'No configuration for that Team' })
+    await activity.log({
+      req,
+      action: 'team.integration.delete',
+      detail:
+        `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) removed the ${integration.DISCORD} bridge for ` +
+        `${teamId === null ? 'all Teams (default)' : `Team #${teamId}`}`,
+    })
+    return res.json({ ok: true })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'delete integration config')
+  }
+}
+
+// ── Voice channels (§7.3, phase 9) — admin only ────────────────────────────
+//
+// Admin-only for the same reason the bridge is: this creates and destroys
+// structure in somebody's Discord guild, which is deployment configuration and
+// not the kind of decision §2.9 files a request for.
+
+/**
+ * Everything the panel renders, in one call: the settings, the live rows, and
+ * the bot's own answer about whether it can do the job.
+ *
+ * The preflight is here rather than behind a separate endpoint the panel polls,
+ * because it is not a detail — an operator whose bot lacks Manage Roles has a
+ * screen full of controls that cannot work, and finding that out needs to be the
+ * first thing on the page rather than the result of pressing something.
+ */
+async function voiceConfig(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const [config, rows, flight] = await Promise.all([
+      voiceSettings.all(),
+      voice.list(),
+      // Never fatal: a bot container that is down must not take the settings
+      // screen with it, since fixing the settings may be exactly why the operator
+      // came. `preflight` already turns every failure into a `ready: false`.
+      voiceSync.preflight().catch((err) => ({ ready: false, connected: false, reason: err.message })),
+    ])
+    return res.json({
+      platform: voice.PLATFORM,
+      settings: config,
+      preflight: flight,
+      rows,
+      lastPass: voiceSync.lastPass(),
+    })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'voice config')
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Save the settings, with one precondition.
+ *
+ * **Switching voice ON is refused 422 while the bot cannot act.** The same shape
+ * §7.2's acknowledgement takes, and for the same reason: a setting that saves and
+ * then quietly does nothing is worse than one that will not save. Turning it OFF
+ * is never gated — an operator disabling a feature because it is misbehaving must
+ * not be blocked by the misbehaviour.
+ */
+async function saveVoiceConfig(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const turningOn = req.body.enabled === true && !(await voiceSettings.enabled())
+    if (turningOn) {
+      const flight = await voiceSync.preflight()
+      if (!flight.ready) {
+        return res.status(422).json({
+          message: flight.reason || 'the bot cannot manage channels and roles in this guild yet',
+          code: 'voice_preflight_failed',
+          preflight: flight,
+        })
+      }
+    }
+
+    const config = await voiceSettings.save(req.body, req.user.id)
+    await activity.log({
+      req,
+      action: 'team.voice.settings',
+      detail:
+        `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) saved the Team voice settings: `
+        + `${config.enabled ? 'enabled' : 'disabled'}, minimum ${config.minMembers} members, `
+        + `${config.graceDays}-day grace window, ${config.staffRoles.length} staff role(s)`,
+    })
+
+    // A save that just switched it on should not wait fifteen minutes for the
+    // first channel to appear.
+    if (config.enabled) voiceSync.request({ reason: 'settings saved' })
+    return res.json(config)
+  } catch (err) {
+    if (err.status) return res.status(err.status).json({ message: err.message, code: err.code })
+    return fail(res, err, 'save voice config')
+  }
+}
+
+/** Run a pass now, awaited, so the operator gets the outcome and not a promise. */
+async function voicePass(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return res.json(await voiceSync.passNow('admin'))
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'voice pass')
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Remove one Team's channel and role now, ignoring the grace window.
+ *
+ * The window exists to stop churn on a Team crossing the threshold twice in a
+ * week; an operator pressing remove is not churn. It is also the only way to
+ * clean up while voice is switched off, which is the one state where no pass will
+ * ever reach the row.
+ */
+async function removeVoice(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const teamId = Number(req.params.teamId)
+    const result = await voiceSync.removeNow(teamId)
+    if (!result.ok) return res.status(result.status || 400).json({ message: result.message })
+    await activity.log({
+      req,
+      action: 'team.voice.remove',
+      detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) removed the voice channel and role for Team #${teamId}`,
+    })
+    return res.json({ ok: true })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'remove voice')
+  }
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  voiceConfig,
+  saveVoiceConfig,
+  voicePass,
+  removeVoice,
+  integrationConfig,
+  saveIntegrationConfig,
+  deleteIntegrationConfig,
+  forumModeration,
+  forumUploads,
+  forumSettingsState,
+  listTeams,
+  getTeam,
+  resync,
+  archive,
+  grants,
+  setLeaderOverride,
+  clearLeaderOverride,
+  unhide,
+  hide,
+  displayName,
+  reviewQueue,
+  listRequests,
+  decideRequest,
+}

server/src/router/v1/admin/teams.router.js

@@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
+// Admin · Teams — sync state, the review queue, the approval queue, and the staff
+// actions on a Team (TEAMS.md §2.11).
+//
+// Mounted at /api/v1/admin/teams by admin/index.js, which already applied
+// `noindex, isLoggedIn, staffOnly`. Staff-wide, like /admin/activity: a moderator
+// runs the review queue, and the three actions that PUBLISH untrusted
+// game-sourced strings are gated per request inside the controller rather than
+// per route here — a moderator may call them, and calling them files a request
+// instead of applying one.
+//
+// **Declaration order matters in this file.** `/review`, `/requests` and `/resync`
+// are literal paths that would otherwise be captured by `/:id`, so every literal
+// route is declared before the first :param route. Express is first-match-wins and
+// a `/:id` ahead of `/review` would silently turn a queue into a lookup for a Team
+// whose id is "review".
+
+const express = require('express')
+const { body, param, query } = require('express-validator')
+
+const ctrl = require('./teams.controller')
+const validate = require('../../../middleware/validate')
+const { requireRole } = require('../../../utils/auth')
+
+const teamsRouter = express.Router()
+
+// The one ADMIN-only corner of a staff-wide router (§7.2, phase 8). Configuring
+// where a Team's events leave the site for is not the §2.9 kind of decision a
+// moderator files a request for; it is deployment configuration, and it sits with
+// the role that already holds the bot token.
+// Hoisted rather than written inline, and it has to stay that way: a regex
+// LITERAL followed directly by `.test(` makes swagger-autogen's static parser run
+// away, and `npm run swagger` dies with "invalid array length — heap out of
+// memory" instead of generating a spec. Phase 8 shipped it inline and left the
+// generator unable to run at all; the same regex reached through a const (the
+// idiom `modules.router.js` already uses) parses fine.
+const TEAM_ID = /^[0-9]+$/
+
+const adminOnly = requireRole('admin')
+
+// ── Literal paths, first ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+teamsRouter.get(
+  '/',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'List Teams with sync state'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Includes hidden Teams and the module’s sync state verbatim — last attempt, last success, consecutive failures and the last error — which is what an operator debugging a stale projection needs.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['archived'] = { in: 'query', required: false, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'Set to 1 to include archived Teams.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Teams and sync state', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/AdminTeamList" } } } } */
+  query('archived').optional().isIn(['0', '1']),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.listTeams,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.post(
+  '/resync',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Run a reconciliation now'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Awaited, so the response carries the outcome including the provider’s own error when it refused. The four refusal gates still apply — a manual resync cannot make core act on an answer it does not trust.'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'The reconciliation result', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamResyncResult" } } } } */
+  ctrl.resync,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.get(
+  '/review',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'The reserved-name review queue'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Teams auto-hidden because their name matched a reserved term, each showing which term matched. A Team a human has already ruled on leaves the queue and is never re-hidden by a later sweep.'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Auto-hidden Teams awaiting review', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamReviewQueue" } } } } */
+  ctrl.reviewQueue,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.get(
+  '/requests',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'The moderation approval queue'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Requests filed by moderators for the three actions that publish untrusted game-sourced strings. Decided rows are kept — the record that a moderator asked to publish a name and an admin refused is the part worth having.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['status'] = { in: 'query', required: false, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'pending (default) | approved | rejected | withdrawn | all' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Moderation requests', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamRequestQueue" } } } } */
+  query('status').optional().isIn(['pending', 'approved', 'rejected', 'withdrawn', 'all']),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.listRequests,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.post(
+  '/requests/:id/decide',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Approve or reject a moderation request (admin only)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Admin only, checked live against the database rather than from a token claim. Approving applies the action; rejecting keeps the row and changes nothing. A request already decided returns 409, so two admins deciding at once cannot double-apply.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Request id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamDecideRequest" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Decided', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/OkResponse" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[400] = { description: 'Validation error', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/ValidationError" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[403] = { description: 'Only an admin may decide a request', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'No such request', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[409] = { description: 'Already decided', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('status').isIn(['approved', 'rejected']),
+  body('note').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ max: 255 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.decideRequest,
+)
+
+// ── :id paths ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+// Both literal, and both under '/forum' rather than '/:id/forum', so they cannot
+// be captured by the '/:id' lookup below — 'forum' is not an integer, but relying
+// on the validator to reject it would mean the route table's meaning depended on
+// a param check three lines further down.
+teamsRouter.get(
+  '/forum/uploads',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Upload attribution across every Team forum'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Who uploaded what, when and how much. This view is why an attribution table exists at all: the liability an operator accepts before enabling uploads is meaningless if "who uploaded this" cannot be answered afterwards. Deleted rows are excluded unless `deleted=1` — a soft-deleted upload still has bytes on disk until the sweep runs.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['limit'] = { in: 'query', required: false, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Page size (default 100).' }
+  // #swagger.parameters['offset'] = { in: 'query', required: false, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Rows to skip (default 0).' }
+  // #swagger.parameters['deleted'] = { in: 'query', required: false, schema: { type: 'string', enum: ['0','1'] }, description: 'Include soft-deleted uploads.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Uploads with their attribution', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamForumUploadList" } } } } */
+  query('limit').optional().isInt({ min: 1, max: 500 }).toInt(),
+  query('offset').optional().isInt({ min: 0 }).toInt(),
+  query('deleted').optional().isIn(['0', '1']),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.forumUploads,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.get(
+  '/forum/settings',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'The forum switch, the image policy, and the acknowledgement’s state'
+  // #swagger.description = 'The two settings themselves ride the ordinary admin settings endpoint and are published to every client; this route adds the one thing that is NOT public — whether the uploads acknowledgement has been given, by whom, and whether the notice has been reworded since. A stale acknowledgement does not disable uploads: it raises a banner and freezes every other forum setting until it is re-given.'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Forum settings state', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamForumSettingsState" } } } } */
+  ctrl.forumSettingsState,
+)
+
+// ── The integration bridge (§7.2) — literal, and before /:id ──────────────
+
+teamsRouter.get(
+  '/integrations',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'The Team notification bridge’s configuration (admin only)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Every configured destination for the platform, the deployment-wide default first, alongside the events that may be bridged and which of them are members-only. A members-only event carries content nobody outside the Team may read, so enabling one requires an acknowledgement that the destination channel is restricted to that Team’s members — recorded here with who gave it.'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Bridge configuration', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamIntegrationConfig" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[403] = { description: 'Admin role required', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  adminOnly,
+  ctrl.integrationConfig,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.put(
+  '/integrations',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Create or replace one bridge destination (admin only)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Omit teamId (or send null) to edit the deployment-wide default; a per-Team row overrides it. Enabling a bridge that carries team.forum.post or team.announcement without membersAck is refused 422 — the events are members-only always, and core cannot see a Discord channel’s permissions, so the operator’s acknowledgement is the only thing that can stand in for the check. Changing the channel clears a previous acknowledgement: it was given for a destination, not for a row.'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'The saved row', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamIntegrationRow" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'No such Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[422] = { description: 'Not enableable — no channel, no events, or a members-only event without the acknowledgement', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  adminOnly,
+  body('teamId').optional({ nullable: true }).isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('events').isArray({ max: 8 }),
+  body('channelRef').optional({ nullable: true }).isString().trim().isLength({ max: 64 }),
+  body('enabled').optional().isBoolean().toBoolean(),
+  body('membersAck').optional().isBoolean().toBoolean(),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.saveIntegrationConfig,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.delete(
+  '/integrations/:teamId',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Remove one bridge destination (admin only)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Pass the literal string default to remove the deployment-wide row. Removing a per-Team override makes that Team fall back to the default, which is not the same as disabling it — disable the row instead if that is what is wanted.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['teamId'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'Team id, or the literal string default.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Removed', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/OkResponse" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'Nothing configured for that Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  adminOnly,
+  param('teamId').custom((v) => v === 'default' || TEAM_ID.test(v)),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.deleteIntegrationConfig,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.get(
+  '/:id',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Get one Team, with its roster, grant ledger and pending requests'
+  // #swagger.description = 'The roster carries the resolved leadership and what the game actually said, so an override is visible as a decision rather than presented as fact. Departed members are included.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Team id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'The Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/AdminTeam" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'No such Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.getTeam,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.get(
+  '/:id/grants',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'The full forum-grant ledger for a Team, revoked rows included'
+  // #swagger.description = 'The structured record the access resolver reads. The grant/revoke flow itself lands in the forum phase; this is the read side.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Team id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'The grant ledger', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamGrantLedger" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.grants,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.get(
+  '/:id/forum/moderation',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'A Team’s forum moderation ledger'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Append-only, and deliberately separate from the site’s mod_actions/appeals pair (§5.3): that one is Discord-sanction-shaped and bot-owned, and routing a guild leader locking a thread through it would make ordinary housekeeping an appealable sanction. `actorRole` records which authority was exercised — a leader’s action appears only here, a staffer’s appears here AND in activity_log. Answers whether or not the forum is switched on.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'The Team id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'The ledger, newest first', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamForumModerationLedger" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'No such Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.forumModeration,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.post(
+  '/:id/archive',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Archive a Team (staff)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Not gated: archiving withdraws a Team from public surfaces rather than publishing anything.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Team id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: false, content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamReasonRequest" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Archived', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/OkResponse" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'No such Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('reason').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ max: 255 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.archive,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.post(
+  '/:id/hide',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Hide a Team from public surfaces (staff)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Deliberately NOT gated. Publishing untrusted data needs a second pair of eyes; withdrawing it needs to be possible at once, by whoever is on duty.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Team id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: false, content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamReasonRequest" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Hidden', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/OkResponse" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'No such Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('reason').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ max: 255 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.hide,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.post(
+  '/:id/unhide',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Un-hide a Team — admin applies, moderator requests'
+  // #swagger.description = 'One of the three gated actions: it publishes a name that tripped the impersonation list. An admin applies it at once; a moderator files a pending request and nothing changes publicly until an admin approves.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Team id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: false, content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamReasonRequest" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Applied, or filed for approval — see `pending`', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamModerationResult" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'No such Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('reason').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ max: 255 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.unhide,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.post(
+  '/:id/display-name',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Set or clear a Team’s display name — admin applies, moderator requests'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Gated for the same reason as un-hiding: it substitutes free text into the same public surfaces. Identity is untouched — the Team’s `name` stays frozen for the life of the row, and only what is rendered changes. An empty displayName clears the override.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Team id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamDisplayNameRequest" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Applied, or filed for approval — see `pending`', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamModerationResult" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[400] = { description: 'Validation error', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/ValidationError" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'No such Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('displayName').optional({ nullable: true }).isString().trim().isLength({ max: 160 }),
+  body('reason').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ max: 255 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.displayName,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.post(
+  '/:id/leader-override',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Grant or deny leadership for one member (staff)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Applied on top of the synced value at READ time; the projection is never mutated. That is what makes an override survive a resync — one written into team_members would be undone by the next reconciliation. Not gated: it publishes no game-sourced string.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Team id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamLeaderOverrideRequest" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Override set', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/OkResponse" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[400] = { description: 'Validation error', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/ValidationError" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'No such Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('memberKey').isString().trim().isLength({ min: 1, max: 191 }),
+  body('effect').isIn(['grant', 'deny']),
+  body('reason').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ max: 255 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.setLeaderOverride,
+)
+
+teamsRouter.delete(
+  '/:id/leader-override/:memberKey',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Clear a leadership override (staff)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'The member reverts to whatever the game says at the next read; nothing in the projection changes, because nothing in it was ever changed.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'Team id.' }
+  // #swagger.parameters['memberKey'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The module’s member key.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Override cleared', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/OkResponse" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'No such override', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  param('memberKey').isString().trim().isLength({ min: 1, max: 191 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.clearLeaderOverride,
+)
+
+module.exports = teamsRouter

server/src/router/v1/admin/teamsVoice.router.js

@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+// Admin · Teams · Voice channels (TEAMS.md §7.3, phase 9).
+//
+// Mounted at /api/v1/admin/teams/voice by `admin/index.js`, which has already
+// applied `noindex, isLoggedIn, staffOnly` above it — and which mounts this
+// prefix BEFORE `/teams`, so these paths never reach the teams router's `/:id`.
+// Every route here adds `adminOnly` on top: this creates and destroys structure
+// in somebody's Discord guild, which is deployment configuration and not the §2.9
+// kind of decision a moderator files a request for.
+//
+// **Its own file for a mechanical reason, and the reason is worth recording.**
+// These four routes belong beside the notification bridge's three in
+// `teams.router.js`, and they started there. That file sits exactly at
+// swagger-autogen's per-file limit: at twenty `teamsRouter.*` statements
+// `npm run swagger` dies with "invalid array length — heap out of memory", and at
+// nineteen it generates. ONE more statement of any shape tips it — a route with no
+// annotations at all does, and so does a bare `use`, which is why the mount is in
+// `admin/index.js` rather than here in the file it logically belongs to. The same
+// probe route added to `discordBot.router.js` generates fine, so the limit is
+// per-file and not tree-wide.
+//
+// So: if this file grows, split it again rather than moving it back.
+
+const express = require('express')
+const { body, param } = require('express-validator')
+
+const ctrl = require('./teams.controller')
+const validate = require('../../../middleware/validate')
+const { requireRole } = require('../../../utils/auth')
+
+const voiceRouter = express.Router()
+
+const adminOnly = requireRole('admin')
+
+// `/sync` before `/:teamId`, the same first-match-wins rule the parent file
+// follows: a `:teamId` declared first would turn the pass into a lookup for a Team
+// whose id is "sync".
+
+voiceRouter.get(
+  '/',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Team voice channel configuration and state (admin only)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'The settings, every provisioned channel with its state and last error, and the bot’s own preflight — whether it is connected, whether it holds Manage Channels and Manage Roles, and how close the guild is to Discord’s cap of 250 roles. Access is granted with a role per Team, so that cap is the ceiling on how many Teams can have voice at all.'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Voice configuration and state', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamVoiceConfig" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[403] = { description: 'Admin role required', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  adminOnly,
+  ctrl.voiceConfig,
+)
+
+voiceRouter.put(
+  '/',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Save the Team voice settings (admin only)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Switching voice on is refused 422 while the bot cannot manage channels and roles in the guild — a setting that saves and then quietly does nothing is worse than one that will not save. Switching it off is never gated, and never tears anything down: existing channels stop being reconciled and are removed one at a time by an operator who means it.'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'The saved settings', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamVoiceSettings" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[422] = { description: 'The bot cannot manage channels or roles yet', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  adminOnly,
+  body('enabled').optional().isBoolean().toBoolean(),
+  body('minMembers').optional().isInt({ min: 1, max: 10000 }).toInt(),
+  body('graceDays').optional().isInt({ min: 0, max: 90 }).toInt(),
+  body('staffRoles').optional({ nullable: true }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.saveVoiceConfig,
+)
+
+voiceRouter.post(
+  '/sync',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Run a voice reconciliation now (admin only)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Awaited, so the response carries the outcome. The three suspensions still apply — a manual pass will not run while voice is off, while the Team projection is stale, or while the bot cannot act — and the response says which one stopped it.'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'The pass result', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamVoicePassResult" } } } } */
+  adminOnly,
+  ctrl.voicePass,
+)
+
+voiceRouter.delete(
+  '/:teamId',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Admin · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Remove one Team’s voice channel and role (admin only)'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Immediate, ignoring the grace window: the window exists to stop churn on a Team that crosses the threshold twice in a week, and an operator pressing remove is not churn. The channel and the role go together — a role for a channel that no longer exists is a badge for nowhere.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['teamId'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' } }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Removed', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/OkResponse" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'That Team has no voice channel', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  adminOnly,
+  param('teamId').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.removeVoice,
+)
+
+module.exports = voiceRouter

server/src/router/v1/auth/notifications.controller.js

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 const pushDevices = require('../../../model/pushDevices/pushDevices.model')
 const notificationSubs = require('../../../model/notificationSubs/notificationSubs.model')
 const registries = require('../../../modules/registries')
+const teamPrefs = require('../../../model/teams/teamNotify.model')
 const { isAllowedEndpoint } = require('../../../utils/pushDispatch')
 
 const log = require('../../../utils/logger')('notifications')
@@ -78,6 +79,39 @@ async function putSubscriptions(req, res) {
   }
 }
 
+// GET /auth/me/notifications/teams — this user's per-Team preferences, one row
+// per Team they could be notified about whether or not they have ever set one.
+//
+// Not gated on `teams_forums_enabled`: two of the four streams (member joined,
+// leadership changed) have nothing to do with the forum, so a deployment with
+// forums switched off still has preferences worth showing.
+async function getTeamPrefs(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return res.json({ teams: await teamPrefs.listPrefs(req.user.id) })
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.error('getTeamPrefs', err)
+    return res.status(500).json({ message: 'Internal Server Error' })
+  }
+}
+
+// PUT /auth/me/notifications/teams — replace the caller's whole preference set.
+//
+// PUT-the-whole-set, matching the subscriptions endpoint beside it, and the
+// `teams` array is REQUIRED even when empty — the Android gotcha in
+// docs/android/PLAN.md §11: a DTO field with a default is dropped by kotlinx when
+// it equals that default, so clearing the last entry would arrive as a body with
+// no array at all and 400. Entries naming a Team the caller is not in are dropped
+// by the model rather than refused here (an ordinary race, not a client bug).
+async function putTeamPrefs(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const { prefs } = await teamPrefs.replacePrefs(req.user.id, req.body.teams)
+    return res.json({ teams: prefs })
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.error('putTeamPrefs', err)
+    return res.status(500).json({ message: 'Internal Server Error' })
+  }
+}
+
 module.exports = {
   registerDevice,
   listDevices,
@@ -85,4 +119,6 @@ module.exports = {
   getStreams,
   getSubscriptions,
   putSubscriptions,
+  getTeamPrefs,
+  putTeamPrefs,
 }

server/src/router/v1/auth/notifications.routes.js

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ const notif = require('./notifications.controller')
 const { requireAuth } = require('../../../auth/session.middleware')
 const noindex = require('../../../middleware/noindex')
 const validate = require('../../../middleware/validate')
+const { EMAIL_MODES } = require('../../../model/teams/teamNotify.model')
 
 const notifRouter = express.Router()
 
@@ -97,4 +98,39 @@ notifRouter.put(
   notif.putSubscriptions,
 )
 
+// ── Per-Team preferences (TEAMS.md §6.3, phase 6) ──────────────────────────
+//
+// The granularity per-stream opt-in cannot express: "I am in five Teams and want
+// notifications from one". Opt-OUT for push (no row means notified) and opt-IN
+// for email, so a user who never opens this screen is in the state the schema
+// documents rather than in one this router has to describe.
+notifRouter.get(
+  '/notifications/teams',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Auth · Me']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Get the current user’s per-Team notification preferences'
+  // #swagger.description = 'One entry per Team the caller could be notified about — active membership or an active forum grant — plus any Team they have a stored preference for. Defaults are applied server-side: `muted` false, `emailMode` "off".'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Per-Team preferences', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamNotificationPrefs" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[401] = { description: 'Not authenticated', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  notif.getTeamPrefs,
+)
+
+notifRouter.put(
+  '/notifications/teams',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Auth · Me']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Replace the current user’s per-Team notification preferences'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Replaces the whole set. The `teams` array is required even when empty. Entries naming a Team the caller has no access to are ignored; the stored set is echoed back.'
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamNotificationPrefs" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Updated preferences', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamNotificationPrefs" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[400] = { description: 'Validation error', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/ValidationError" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[401] = { description: 'Not authenticated', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  body('teams').isArray(),
+  body('teams.*.teamId').isInt({ min: 1 }),
+  body('teams.*.muted').optional().isBoolean(),
+  body('teams.*.emailMode').optional().isIn(EMAIL_MODES),
+  validate,
+  notif.putTeamPrefs,
+)
+
 module.exports = notifRouter

server/src/router/v1/internal/internal.controller.js

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 const botConfig = require('../../../model/botConfig/botConfig.model')
+const slashCommands = require('../../../utils/slashCommands')
 const log = require('../../../utils/logger')('internal')
 
 // GET /internal/bot-config — called by the bot process on its own boot so a
@@ -16,4 +17,40 @@ async function getBotConfig(req, res) {
   }
 }
 
-module.exports = { getBotConfig }
+// GET /internal/commands — the registered slash-command definitions, pulled by
+// the bot on `ready` and again whenever it is nudged (TEAMS.md §7.1).
+//
+// `version` is `modules.version()`, the counter every module state change bumps.
+// The bot holds the value it registered with and re-PUTs only when it differs,
+// which is what makes DEREGISTRATION free: the bot's single whole-set
+// `REST.put(applicationGuildCommands)` means a module that is gone is simply
+// absent from the next pull, with nobody having to remember to unregister it.
+function listCommands(req, res) {
+  return res.json(slashCommands.definitions())
+}
+
+// POST /internal/commands/dispatch — run one command and answer with the
+// envelope. Never 500s on a handler's behalf: `dispatch` catches per handler and
+// reports `{ ok: false, reason }`, so the bot always has something to render and
+// a module's failure is its own.
+async function dispatchCommand(req, res) {
+  const { command, options, platform, platformUserId, guildId } = req.body || {}
+  if (!command) return res.status(400).json({ ok: false, reason: 'unknown' })
+  try {
+    const result = await slashCommands.dispatch({
+      command,
+      options: options && typeof options === 'object' ? options : {},
+      platform: platform || 'discord',
+      platformUserId,
+      guildId,
+    })
+    return res.json(result)
+  } catch (err) {
+    // dispatch() is documented never to throw; if it ever does, that is core's
+    // bug and not the module's, and it is logged as one.
+    log.error('internal.dispatchCommand', err)
+    return res.status(500).json({ ok: false, reason: 'error' })
+  }
+}
+
+module.exports = { getBotConfig, listCommands, dispatchCommand }

server/src/router/v1/internal/internal.routes.js

@@ -16,4 +16,20 @@ router.get(
   ctrl.getBotConfig,
 )
 
+// The slash-command seam (TEAMS.md §7.1). Both stay off the public API and out
+// of the OpenAPI document for the same reason /bot-config does: the caller is
+// the bot process on the private compose network, and `/internal/*` is not a
+// published contract.
+router.get(
+  '/commands',
+  // #swagger.ignore = true
+  ctrl.listCommands,
+)
+
+router.post(
+  '/commands/dispatch',
+  // #swagger.ignore = true
+  ctrl.dispatchCommand,
+)
+
 module.exports = router

server/src/router/v1/player/index.js

@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ const noindex = require('../../../middleware/noindex')
 
 const accountRouter = require('./account.router')
 const appealsRouter = require('./appeals.router')
+const teamsRouter = require('./teams.router')
+const teamForumRouter = require('./teamForum.router')
 
 const playerRouter = express.Router()
 
@@ -39,5 +41,10 @@ playerRouter.use(noindex, requireAuth)
 
 playerRouter.use('/account', accountRouter)
 playerRouter.use('/appeals', appealsRouter)
+playerRouter.use('/teams', teamsRouter)
+// Same prefix, second router. The forum and the leader-exercised grant flow are a
+// different capability from "the caller's own Teams", and splitting them keeps
+// each file about one thing; no path in the two collides.
+playerRouter.use('/teams', teamForumRouter)
 
 module.exports = playerRouter

server/src/router/v1/player/teamForum.controller.js

@@ -0,0 +1,485 @@
+// Player · Team forums — the participant surface (TEAMS.md §5.4).
+//
+// Under `/player` rather than `/admin` for the reason §2.11 gives: a forum
+// participant may be a plain player, a LEADER is a player, and the `/admin` tier
+// gate is `requireRole('admin','editor','moderator')` — putting a leader endpoint
+// behind it would mean widening that gate. The leader check is a per-handler
+// question on top of the tier's `requireAuth`.
+//
+// **Two guards run before anything else in this file, in this order:**
+//
+//   1. `teams_forums_enabled` — off means every route here answers 404, not 403.
+//      A 403 says "this exists and you may not have it", which advertises a
+//      feature the operator deliberately turned off; 404 says "not a thing on
+//      this site", which is the true statement (§5.5.1).
+//   2. the §2.5 access resolver — and never a membership check. Both a member and
+//      a granted non-member reach the forum, and asking `team_members` directly
+//      here is precisely how paths 1 and 3 drift back together.
+//
+// Both live in `resolveForum` below so a handler cannot forget either.
+
+const teamsDb = require('../../../model/teams/teams.db')
+const access = require('../../../model/teams/teamAccess.model')
+const grants = require('../../../model/teams/teamGrants.model')
+const forum = require('../../../model/teams/teamForum.model')
+const forumSettings = require('../../../model/teams/teamForumSettings.model')
+const uploads = require('../../../model/teams/teamForumUploads.model')
+const reports = require('../../../model/reports/contentReports.model')
+const activity = require('../../../model/activity/activity.model')
+const teamNotify = require('../../../utils/teamNotify')
+
+const log = require('../../../utils/logger')('teams')
+
+const STAFF_ROLES = ['admin', 'moderator']
+const isStaff = (user) => STAFF_ROLES.includes(user?.role)
+
+const fail = (res, err, what) => {
+  log.error(`player team forum: ${what} failed`, { message: err.message })
+  return res.status(500).json({ message: 'Internal Server Error' })
+}
+
+const send = (res, result, body = { ok: true }) =>
+  (result.ok ? res.json({ ...body, ...result }) : res.status(result.status || 400).json({ message: result.error }))
+
+/**
+ * The two guards, plus the Team, plus what this caller may do in it.
+ *
+ * Returns null when the caller should see a 404 — which covers three different
+ * situations on purpose: the forum is switched off, the Team does not exist, and
+ * the caller has no access to it. A private room's contents and its existence are
+ * the same secret.
+ */
+async function resolveForum(req) {
+  if (!(await forumSettings.forumsEnabled())) return null
+  const team = await teamsDb.findBySlug(req.params.slug)
+  if (!team) return null
+
+  const resolved = await access.forumAccess(team.id, req.user.id)
+  const staff = isStaff(req.user)
+  if (!resolved.allowed && !staff) return null
+
+  return {
+    team,
+    access: resolved,
+    staff,
+    // Staff moderate anywhere; a leader moderates their own Team. `actorRole`
+    // records WHICH of the two was exercised, and leadership wins when both are
+    // true: a leader who is also a moderator acting on their own Team is doing
+    // ordinary housekeeping, and logging it as a staff intervention would put a
+    // guild's day-to-day tidying into the site's staff-accountability trail.
+    canModerate: resolved.isLeader || staff,
+    actorRole: resolved.isLeader ? 'leader' : 'staff',
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Who is reading, for the read path's per-post `canEdit`.
+ *
+ * A separate read of the edit window rather than one folded into `resolveForum`,
+ * because only the two routes that render posts need it and `resolveForum` runs
+ * on every route in this file including the ones that never look at a body.
+ */
+async function viewerFor(ctx, user) {
+  return {
+    userId: user.id,
+    isStaff: ctx.staff,
+    windowMinutes: await forumSettings.editWindowMinutes(),
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Fan a new thread or reply out to the Team (TEAMS.md Part 6, phase 6).
+ *
+ * **Here rather than in the forum model**, because the model takes an
+ * already-resolved access decision and reads no membership table by design, and
+ * the fan-out reads both to compute its recipients. A notification call inside the
+ * model would make it transitively depend on what its own header says it must not.
+ *
+ * **Awaited, and it still cannot fail the request.** `teamNotify.forumPost` catches
+ * everything and returns; awaiting it costs the response the time of one recipient
+ * query plus, in `immediate` mode, the SMTP calls — which is why the alternative
+ * (fire-and-forget) is tempting and wrong here: an un-awaited rejection in an
+ * Express handler is an unhandled rejection, and the tests would have no moment at
+ * which to assert the fan-out happened.
+ */
+async function announce(ctx, actor, notify) {
+  if (!notify) return
+  await teamNotify.forumPost({
+    team: ctx.team,
+    threadId: notify.threadId,
+    threadTitle: notify.title,
+    type: notify.type,
+    authorUserId: actor.id,
+    authorName: actor.username,
+    bodyHtml: notify.bodyHtml,
+  })
+}
+
+// ── threads ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+async function listThreads(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const ctx = await resolveForum(req)
+    if (!ctx) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+    return res.json({
+      threads: await forum.listThreads(ctx.team.id, { canModerate: ctx.canModerate }),
+      // Two capabilities, not one. Phase 4 had a single `canPost` because there
+      // was a single kind of thread to post; phase 5 opened discussion to every
+      // participant while announcements stayed with the leaders, so a client that
+      // read one boolean would have to guess which right it described.
+      // `canPost` is kept and now means "may open a discussion", which is what a
+      // 5a client's composer was for — an old client offering the composer to a
+      // member is a client offering the thing the server now allows.
+      canPost: true,
+      canAnnounce: ctx.canModerate,
+      canModerate: ctx.canModerate,
+      imageMode: await forumSettings.imageMode(),
+    })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'list threads')
+  }
+}
+
+async function getThread(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const ctx = await resolveForum(req)
+    if (!ctx) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+    const thread = await forum.getThread(ctx.team.id, Number(req.params.id), {
+      canModerate: ctx.canModerate,
+      viewer: await viewerFor(ctx, req.user),
+    })
+    if (!thread) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+    return res.json({ ...thread, canModerate: ctx.canModerate })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'get thread')
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Open a thread.
+ *
+ * **The check splits by TYPE, which is what phase 4 said would happen here.** An
+ * announcement is leader-authored; a discussion is open to every participant — and
+ * "participant" means anyone `resolveForum` let through, which includes a granted
+ * non-member with no game identity at all. That is path 3 doing its job: a forum
+ * guest reads and writes exactly as a member does, because the alternative is a
+ * second class of reader whose rights have to be tracked somewhere else.
+ *
+ * The default type is still `announcement`, unchanged from 5a: a client that
+ * posts without saying what it is posting is a 5a client, and a 5a client only
+ * ever posted announcements. Defaulting the other way would silently turn its
+ * announcements into discussions.
+ */
+async function createThread(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const ctx = await resolveForum(req)
+    if (!ctx) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+
+    const type = req.body.type || 'announcement'
+    if (type === 'announcement' && !ctx.canModerate) {
+      return res.status(403).json({ message: 'Only Team leaders may post announcements' })
+    }
+
+    const { notify, ...result } = await forum.createThread({
+      team: ctx.team,
+      actor: req.user,
+      type,
+      title: req.body.title,
+      body: req.body.body,
+    })
+    if (result.ok) await announce(ctx, req.user, notify)
+    return send(res, result)
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'create thread')
+  }
+}
+
+/** Reply to a discussion thread. Every participant may; the model decides the rest. */
+async function createPost(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const ctx = await resolveForum(req)
+    if (!ctx) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+
+    const { notify, ...result } = await forum.createPost({
+      team: ctx.team,
+      threadId: Number(req.params.id),
+      actor: req.user,
+      body: req.body.body,
+    })
+    if (result.ok) await announce(ctx, req.user, notify)
+    return send(res, result)
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'create post')
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Edit a post.
+ *
+ * A staff edit of somebody else's words is an intervention and writes
+ * `activity_log` (§5.3) — the one asymmetry that keeps the site's
+ * staff-accountability trail complete without dragging a member fixing their own
+ * typo into it. The model reports which case this was; the controller never
+ * re-derives it, because the two would disagree the day one of them changed.
+ */
+async function editPost(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const ctx = await resolveForum(req)
+    if (!ctx) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+
+    const result = await forum.editPost({
+      team: ctx.team,
+      postId: Number(req.params.id),
+      actor: req.user,
+      isStaff: ctx.staff,
+      windowMinutes: await forumSettings.editWindowMinutes(),
+      body: req.body.body,
+    })
+    if (result.ok && result.staffEdit) {
+      await activity.log({
+        req,
+        action: 'team.forum.edit',
+        detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) edited post #${req.params.id} `
+          + `on team "${ctx.team.name}" (#${ctx.team.id})`,
+      })
+    }
+    return send(res, result)
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'edit post')
+  }
+}
+
+/** Hide, unhide, delete or restore one post. Pin and lock belong to threads. */
+async function moderatePost(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const ctx = await resolveForum(req)
+    if (!ctx) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+    if (!ctx.canModerate) return res.status(403).json({ message: 'Not a leader of this Team' })
+
+    const result = await forum.moderatePost({
+      team: ctx.team,
+      postId: Number(req.params.id),
+      action: req.body.action,
+      actor: req.user,
+      actorRole: ctx.actorRole,
+      reason: req.body.reason,
+    })
+    if (result.ok && ctx.actorRole === 'staff') {
+      await activity.log({
+        req,
+        action: 'team.forum.moderate',
+        detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) ${req.body.action} post #${req.params.id} `
+          + `on team "${ctx.team.name}" (#${ctx.team.id})`
+          + `${req.body.reason ? `: "${req.body.reason}"` : ''}`,
+      })
+    }
+    return send(res, result)
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'moderate post')
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Pin / lock / hide / delete a thread, and its opposites.
+ *
+ * A staff-exercised action ALSO writes `activity_log`; a leader-exercised one
+ * writes only the forum ledger (§5.3). That asymmetry is the whole reason the two
+ * ledgers are cross-referenced rather than merged: routing a guild leader locking
+ * a thread into the site's sanction pipeline would make ordinary housekeeping an
+ * appealable staff action.
+ */
+async function moderateThread(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const ctx = await resolveForum(req)
+    if (!ctx) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+    if (!ctx.canModerate) return res.status(403).json({ message: 'Not a leader of this Team' })
+
+    const result = await forum.moderateThread({
+      team: ctx.team,
+      threadId: Number(req.params.id),
+      action: req.body.action,
+      actor: req.user,
+      actorRole: ctx.actorRole,
+      reason: req.body.reason,
+    })
+    if (result.ok && ctx.actorRole === 'staff') {
+      await activity.log({
+        req,
+        action: 'team.forum.moderate',
+        detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) ${req.body.action} thread #${req.params.id} `
+          + `on team "${ctx.team.name}" (#${ctx.team.id})`
+          + `${req.body.reason ? `: "${req.body.reason}"` : ''}`,
+      })
+    }
+    return send(res, result)
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'moderate thread')
+  }
+}
+
+// ── grants (§2.5 path 3, leader-exercised) ─────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * The grant surface is reachable whether or not the FORUM is on.
+ *
+ * Not an oversight: §5.5.1 says a toggle-off revokes no grant and that the rows
+ * stay authoritative, so a leader must still be able to see and manage them —
+ * they simply have nothing to grant access to for the moment. What the switch
+ * guards is the forum's CONTENT, not its access list.
+ */
+async function listGrants(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const team = await teamsDb.findBySlug(req.params.slug)
+    if (!team) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Team not found' })
+    const authority = await grants.authorityFor(team.id, req.user)
+    if (!authority.may) return res.status(403).json({ message: 'Not a leader of this Team' })
+    return res.json({
+      guests: await grants.forumGuests(team.id),
+      cap: await grants.grantCap(),
+      as: authority.as,
+    })
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'list grants')
+  }
+}
+
+async function createGrant(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const team = await teamsDb.findBySlug(req.params.slug)
+    if (!team) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Team not found' })
+    const result = await grants.grant({
+      team,
+      actor: req.user,
+      userId: req.body.userId,
+      username: req.body.username,
+      reason: req.body.reason,
+    })
+    if (result.ok && result.as === 'staff') {
+      await activity.log({
+        req,
+        action: 'team.forum.grant',
+        detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) granted forum access to ${result.grantee} `
+          + `on team "${team.name}" (#${team.id})`,
+      })
+    }
+    return send(res, result)
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'create grant')
+  }
+}
+
+async function revokeGrant(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const team = await teamsDb.findBySlug(req.params.slug)
+    if (!team) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Team not found' })
+    const result = await grants.revoke({
+      team,
+      actor: req.user,
+      userId: Number(req.params.userId),
+      reason: req.body.reason,
+    })
+    if (result.ok && result.as === 'staff') {
+      await activity.log({
+        req,
+        action: 'team.forum.revoke',
+        detail: `${req.user.username} (#${req.user.id}) revoked forum access from ${result.grantee} `
+          + `on team "${team.name}" (#${team.id})`,
+      })
+    }
+    return send(res, result)
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'revoke grant')
+  }
+}
+
+// ── abuse reports (§5.6) ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * File a report about a thread, a post or an upload.
+ *
+ * **This is the one write in this file that does nothing to the content.** A
+ * report opens a queue item and changes no status, no flag and no counter — which
+ * is what keeps it out of §5.3's moderation ledger, and what stops "report" from
+ * becoming a way for any participant to hide anything.
+ *
+ * It reaches SITE STAFF and nobody else. The hole §5.6 closes is that leaders
+ * moderate their own Team and a Team's leaders are exactly the people who will
+ * not report their own Team, so a leader-visible queue would hand a complaint
+ * about a leader straight back to them. There is deliberately no leader-facing
+ * view anywhere in this phase (org lead, 2026-08-18).
+ *
+ * The route sits behind the same `resolveForum` guard as everything else, so a
+ * reporter is by construction someone who can already see what they are
+ * reporting — and the model additionally checks the target really belongs to the
+ * Team the request came through, or the queue's per-Team filter would be lying.
+ */
+async function createReport(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const ctx = await resolveForum(req)
+    if (!ctx) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+
+    return send(res, await reports.file({
+      team: ctx.team,
+      actor: req.user,
+      targetType: req.body.targetType,
+      targetId: Number(req.body.targetId),
+      reason: req.body.reason,
+      detail: req.body.detail,
+    }))
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'create report')
+  }
+}
+
+// ── uploads (§5.5.4) ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * The same 404 guard, applied at a second level: these routes answer 404 in any
+ * image mode but `uploads`, for the same reason the forum's do when the switch is
+ * off. An upload control the client offers and the server refuses is worse than
+ * no control, which is why the mode is published (§5.5.6) — but the SERVER is
+ * still what enforces it.
+ */
+async function createUpload(req, res) {
+  try {
+    if (!(await forumSettings.uploadsEnabled())) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+    const ctx = await resolveForum(req)
+    if (!ctx) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+    if (!req.file) return res.status(400).json({ message: 'No file uploaded' })
+
+    return send(res, await uploads.accept({ team: ctx.team, actor: req.user, file: req.file }))
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'upload')
+  }
+}
+
+async function deleteUpload(req, res) {
+  try {
+    if (!(await forumSettings.uploadsEnabled())) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+    const ctx = await resolveForum(req)
+    if (!ctx) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Not found' })
+    return send(res, await uploads.remove({
+      id: Number(req.params.id),
+      actor: req.user,
+      isStaff: isStaff(req.user),
+    }))
+  } catch (err) {
+    return fail(res, err, 'delete upload')
+  }
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+  listThreads,
+  getThread,
+  createThread,
+  createPost,
+  editPost,
+  moderateThread,
+  moderatePost,
+  listGrants,
+  createGrant,
+  revokeGrant,
+  createUpload,
+  deleteUpload,
+  createReport,
+}

server/src/router/v1/player/teamForum.router.js

@@ -0,0 +1,297 @@
+// Player · Team forums (TEAMS.md §5.4) and the leader-exercised grant flow (§2.11).
+//
+// Mounted at /api/v1/player/teams by player/index.js — the SAME prefix as
+// teams.router.js, which is why this file exists separately rather than being
+// merged into it: that router is the caller's own Team reads, this one is the
+// forum and the grants. Express walks both in mount order and no path collides
+// ('/:slug/access' vs '/:slug/forum/*' and '/:slug/grants').
+//
+// Every forum route here 404s while `teams_forums_enabled` is off, and the upload
+// routes 404 in any image mode but `uploads`. Both guards are in the controller
+// rather than in middleware here, because both need the resolved Team and the
+// caller's access to decide, and a guard that answers before those are known
+// would have to answer 403 — which is the thing §5.5.1 says not to say.
+
+const express = require('express')
+const { body, param } = require('express-validator')
+
+const ctrl = require('./teamForum.controller')
+const contentReports = require('../../../model/reports/contentReports.model')
+const validate = require('../../../middleware/validate')
+const { makeLimiter } = require('../../../middleware/rateLimit')
+const { upload } = require('../admin/imageUpload')
+
+const forumRouter = express.Router()
+
+// Writes are rate-limited, reads are not. The caps are per IP and generous enough
+// that a Team having a busy afternoon never meets them; what they stop is a script.
+const postLimiter = makeLimiter({
+  windowMs: 10 * 60 * 1000,
+  max: 20,
+  label: 'team-forum-post',
+  message: 'Too many forum posts. Please slow down.',
+})
+
+// Tighter than posting, and for a different reason: §2.5 caps how many active
+// grants a Team may hold, and this caps how fast a leader may approach that cap.
+const grantLimiter = makeLimiter({
+  windowMs: 10 * 60 * 1000,
+  max: 15,
+  label: 'team-forum-grant',
+  message: 'Too many grant changes. Please slow down.',
+})
+
+// Tightest of the three, and §5.6's third rule is why: a report costs the
+// reporter nothing and costs a staffer attention, so the queue is the one surface
+// here that can be used as a harassment tool. The unique key already stops
+// duplicate open reports on one target; this stops a spread of them.
+const reportLimiter = makeLimiter({
+  windowMs: 60 * 60 * 1000,
+  max: 10,
+  label: 'team-forum-report',
+  message: 'Too many reports. Please give staff a chance to look at the ones you have raised.',
+})
+
+// Bytes, not requests: the per-account daily quota lives in the uploads model,
+// and this is the per-IP flood guard in front of it.
+const uploadLimiter = makeLimiter({
+  windowMs: 10 * 60 * 1000,
+  max: 30,
+  label: 'team-forum-upload',
+  message: 'Too many uploads. Please slow down.',
+})
+
+forumRouter.get(
+  '/:slug/forum/threads',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'List a Team forum’s threads'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Reachable by a member (path 1) OR a granted account (path 3) — a forum guest with no linked game identity reads exactly as a member does. Answers 404 while `teams_forums_enabled` is off, and 404 (never 403) to a caller with no access: in a private room, the contents and the existence are the same secret. Hidden threads are included for a leader or staff and for nobody else.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'The thread list, with what this caller may do', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamForumThreadList" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'Forum off, no such Team, or no access', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  ctrl.listThreads,
+)
+
+forumRouter.post(
+  '/:slug/forum/threads',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Open a thread — an announcement or a discussion'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Two kinds of thread, two authorities: an `announcement` is leader-authored and takes no replies, a `discussion` may be opened by any forum participant — including a granted non-member with no game identity, who reads and writes exactly as a member does. `type` defaults to `announcement` so a phase-4 client keeps meaning what it meant. The body is sanitised with the FORUM’s own profile, in which `img` is never allowed — an author writes a URL and core decides at render time whether it becomes a picture.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', required: ['title','body'], properties: { type: { type: 'string', enum: ['announcement','discussion'], default: 'announcement' }, title: { type: 'string', maxLength: 200 }, body: { type: 'string' } } } } } } */
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Posted', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { ok: { type: 'boolean' }, threadId: { type: 'integer' } } } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[403] = { description: 'Only a leader may post an announcement', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  postLimiter,
+  param('slug').isString().trim().isLength({ min: 1, max: 191 }),
+  body('type').optional().isIn(['announcement', 'discussion']),
+  body('title').isString().trim().isLength({ min: 1, max: 200 }),
+  body('body').isString().isLength({ min: 1, max: 40000 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.createThread,
+)
+
+forumRouter.get(
+  '/:slug/forum/threads/:id',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Read one thread and its posts'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Post bodies are rendered under the CURRENT image policy: `disabled` serves the stored HTML unchanged, `remote` and `uploads` add a core-generated <img> beneath each link that names an image. The stored HTML is identical in all three — flipping the policy back to disabled un-renders every image on every existing post with no data migration.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'The thread id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'The thread', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamForumThread" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'Forum off, no such thread, or no access', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.getThread,
+)
+
+forumRouter.post(
+  '/:slug/forum/threads/:id/moderate',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Pin, lock, hide or delete a thread'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Leader or staff. Every action writes the Team’s own append-only moderation ledger recording WHICH authority was exercised; a staff-exercised one additionally writes activity_log, so the site’s staff-accountability trail sees it while a leader’s ordinary housekeeping stays out of it. Deliberately not routed through the site’s mod_actions/appeals pair, which is Discord-sanction-shaped.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'The thread id.' }
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', required: ['action'], properties: { action: { type: 'string', enum: ['pin','unpin','lock','unlock','hide','unhide','delete','restore'] }, reason: { type: 'string', maxLength: 255 } } } } } } */
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Applied', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { ok: { type: 'boolean' }, action: { type: 'string' }, threadId: { type: 'integer' } } } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[403] = { description: 'Not a leader of this Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('action').isIn(['pin', 'unpin', 'lock', 'unlock', 'hide', 'unhide', 'delete', 'restore']),
+  body('reason').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ max: 255 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.moderateThread,
+)
+
+forumRouter.post(
+  '/:slug/forum/threads/:id/posts',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Reply to a discussion thread'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Any forum participant — member or granted guest. Three refusals with deliberately different codes: 404 for a thread that is absent or hidden from this caller, 400 for an announcement (which takes no replies by TYPE, not by being closed), and **409 for a locked thread**, because the request is well formed and the thread’s state is what refuses. Locked refuses staff too: they hold `unlock`, so unlock/post/relock reaches the same place leaving three ledger rows that say what happened.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'The thread id.' }
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', required: ['body'], properties: { body: { type: 'string' } } } } } } */
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Posted', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { ok: { type: 'boolean' }, threadId: { type: 'integer' }, postId: { type: 'integer' } } } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[400] = { description: 'Announcements do not take replies', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[409] = { description: 'The thread is locked', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  postLimiter,
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('body').isString().isLength({ min: 1, max: 40000 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.createPost,
+)
+
+forumRouter.patch(
+  '/:slug/forum/posts/:id',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Edit a post'
+  // #swagger.description = 'The author inside `teams_forum_edit_window_minutes` (default 15), staff at any time. **The window is decided on the server, twice**: the read path stamps every post with `canEdit`/`editableUntil` so the client knows whether to draw the control, and this route re-derives it from `created_at` before allowing the write — a time-bounded permission must not take its clock from the party it bounds. A staff edit of someone else’s post additionally writes `activity_log`; a member fixing their own typo does not.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'The post id.' }
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', required: ['body'], properties: { body: { type: 'string' } } } } } } */
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Edited', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { ok: { type: 'boolean' }, postId: { type: 'integer' }, threadId: { type: 'integer' } } } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[403] = { description: 'Not your post, or the edit window has closed', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'Forum off, no such post, or no access', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  postLimiter,
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('body').isString().isLength({ min: 1, max: 40000 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.editPost,
+)
+
+forumRouter.post(
+  '/:slug/forum/posts/:id/moderate',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Hide, unhide, delete or restore a post'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Leader or staff, and the same append-only ledger the thread route writes — one table with `target_type` of `thread` or `post`, so "everything moderated in this Team" stays one query. `pin` and `lock` are refused by name rather than as an unknown action: they describe a thread’s place in a list and its openness to replies, neither of which a post has. Deleting a post soft-deletes the images attached to it and restoring brings them back, so the pair is reversible inside the retention window.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'The post id.' }
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', required: ['action'], properties: { action: { type: 'string', enum: ['hide','unhide','delete','restore'] }, reason: { type: 'string', maxLength: 255 } } } } } } */
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Applied', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { ok: { type: 'boolean' }, action: { type: 'string' }, postId: { type: 'integer' }, threadId: { type: 'integer' } } } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[400] = { description: 'An action that applies to a thread, not a post', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[403] = { description: 'Not a leader of this Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  // **Deliberately the FULL action list, not the four a post accepts.** The model
+  // answers `pin` with "that applies to a thread, not to a post" and an invented
+  // action with "unknown", and a validator that allowed only the four would turn
+  // the first of those into a generic "Validation failed" — leaving the precise
+  // message reachable only from a unit test. Found on the live rig, where `pin`
+  // came back as a validation error rather than as the sentence written for it.
+  // Both are 400 and neither is a security boundary; the difference is entirely
+  // whether the caller is told which mistake they made.
+  body('action').isIn(['pin', 'unpin', 'lock', 'unlock', 'hide', 'unhide', 'delete', 'restore']),
+  body('reason').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ max: 255 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.moderatePost,
+)
+
+// ── grants ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+forumRouter.get(
+  '/:slug/grants',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'The Team’s forum guests, and the per-Team cap'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Leader or staff. Lists ACTIVE grants for accounts that are not members — someone who is both is a member, appears on the roster, and is absent here. Answers regardless of whether the forum is switched on: a toggle-off revokes no grant, so the access list stays manageable while there is temporarily nothing to grant access to.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Forum guests', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/TeamForumGuestList" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[403] = { description: 'Not a leader of this Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  ctrl.listGrants,
+)
+
+forumRouter.post(
+  '/:slug/grants',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Grant forum access to an account'
+  // #swagger.description = 'A grant may name ANY Runic Gateway account, including one with no linked game identity — that is the point of it, since letting an unlinked guildmate into the forum must not be a staff ticket. It never writes team_members: the grantee stays off the roster, out of every membership count, and ineligible for external-platform access. A leader is capped at `teams_max_grants_per_team` active grants (default 50) and rate-limited; staff are exempt and are warned on the way past.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { userId: { type: 'integer' }, username: { type: 'string' }, reason: { type: 'string', maxLength: 255 } } } } } } */
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Granted', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { ok: { type: 'boolean' }, grantee: { type: 'string' }, warning: { type: 'string' } } } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[409] = { description: 'Already granted, or the Team is at its cap', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  grantLimiter,
+  body('userId').optional().isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('username').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ min: 1, max: 32 }),
+  body('reason').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ max: 255 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.createGrant,
+)
+
+forumRouter.delete(
+  '/:slug/grants/:userId',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Revoke forum access'
+  // #swagger.description = 'The grant row is updated rather than deleted — the table is the audit ledger as well as the current state. A leader may not revoke a STAFF-issued grant, which is what stops a leader undoing a moderation decision; the issuer’s role is checked at revoke time, so an account that has since lost its staff role stops protecting the grants it made.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  // #swagger.parameters['userId'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'The grantee’s account id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Revoked', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { ok: { type: 'boolean' }, grantee: { type: 'string' } } } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[403] = { description: 'Not a leader, or the grant was staff-issued', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  grantLimiter,
+  param('userId').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('reason').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ max: 255 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.revokeGrant,
+)
+
+// ── abuse reports (§5.6) ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+forumRouter.post(
+  '/:slug/forum/report',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Report a thread, post or upload to site staff'
+  // #swagger.description = 'The first user-facing report flow core has ever had. **A report is not a moderation action** — it changes nothing about the content and opens a queue item, which is what keeps it out of the Team’s moderation ledger and stops "report" becoming a way for any participant to hide anything. It reaches SITE STAFF and nobody else: leaders moderate their own Team, and a Team’s leaders are exactly the people who will not report their own Team, so there is no leader-facing view of this queue anywhere. One open report per (target, reporter) — a second answers 409 rather than pretending to succeed — plus an hourly per-IP cap.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', required: ['targetType','targetId','reason'], properties: { targetType: { type: 'string', enum: ['team_forum_thread','team_forum_post','team_forum_upload'] }, targetId: { type: 'integer' }, reason: { type: 'string', enum: ['spam','abuse','sexual','illegal','impersonation','other'] }, detail: { type: 'string', maxLength: 500 } } } } } } */
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Raised', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { ok: { type: 'boolean' }, reportId: { type: 'integer' } } } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[404] = { description: 'Forum off, no access, or the target is not in this Team', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[409] = { description: 'You already have an open report on this', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  reportLimiter,
+  body('targetType').isIn(contentReports.TARGET_TYPES),
+  body('targetId').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  body('reason').isIn(contentReports.REASONS),
+  body('detail').optional().isString().trim().isLength({ max: 500 }),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.createReport,
+)
+
+// ── uploads ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+forumRouter.post(
+  '/:slug/forum/uploads',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Upload an image to a Team forum'
+  // #swagger.description = 'Multipart. Answers 404 in any image mode but `uploads`. Beyond the admin upload path’s 8 MB cap, mimetype allowlist and random filename, this one assumes a hostile uploader: the leading bytes are sniffed and a mismatch with the declared type is rejected (a client’s Content-Type header is a claim, not a fact), a rolling per-account byte quota applies, and every accepted file gets an attribution row naming who uploaded it.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  /* #swagger.requestBody = { required: true, content: { "multipart/form-data": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { image: { type: 'string', format: 'binary' } } } } } } */
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Stored', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { ok: { type: 'boolean' }, id: { type: 'integer' }, url: { type: 'string' }, bytes: { type: 'integer' } } } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[400] = { description: 'Not the image type it claims to be', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[429] = { description: 'Daily upload quota reached', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  uploadLimiter,
+  upload.single('image'),
+  ctrl.createUpload,
+)
+
+forumRouter.delete(
+  '/:slug/forum/uploads/:id',
+  // #swagger.tags = ['Player · Teams']
+  // #swagger.summary = 'Remove an uploaded image'
+  // #swagger.description = 'The uploader or staff. Soft: the row is marked and the bytes go with the nightly sweep after a retention window, so a mis-click is recoverable. Note that disabling uploads later stops new files being accepted and does not remove files already uploaded — that is what this route is for.'
+  // #swagger.parameters['slug'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'string' }, description: 'The Team slug.' }
+  // #swagger.parameters['id'] = { in: 'path', required: true, schema: { type: 'integer' }, description: 'The upload id.' }
+  // #swagger.security = [{ "cookieAuth": [] }, { "bearerAuth": [] }]
+  /* #swagger.responses[200] = { description: 'Removed', content: { "application/json": { schema: { type: 'object', properties: { ok: { type: 'boolean' } } } } } } */
+  /* #swagger.responses[403] = { description: 'Not your upload', content: { "application/json": { schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" } } } } */
+  param('id').isInt({ min: 1 }).toInt(),
+  validate,
+  ctrl.deleteUpload,
+)
+
+module.exports = forumRouter

server/src/router/v1/player/teams.controller.js

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// Player · Teams — self-scoped reads. Neither handler takes an identity from the
+// caller; both use req.user.id, which the tier's requireAuth has already proved.
+
+const teams = require('../../../model/teams/teams.model')
+
+const log = require('../../../utils/logger')('teams')
+
+async function listMine(req, res) {
+  try {
+    return res.json(await teams.listForUser(req.user.id))
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.error('player teams: list failed', { message: err.message })
+    return res.status(500).json({ message: 'Internal Server Error' })
+  }
+}
+
+async function getMyAccess(req, res) {
+  try {
+    const resolved = await teams.accessForUser(req.params.slug, req.user.id)
+    if (!resolved) return res.status(404).json({ message: 'Team not found' })
+    return res.json(resolved)
+  } catch (err) {
+    log.error('player teams: access failed', { message: err.message })
+    return res.status(500).json({ message: 'Internal Server Error' })
+  }
+}
+
+module.exports = { listMine, getMyAccess }