Files
website/client
wtclaude e46842a28c
Some checks failed
PR Checks / client-build (pull_request) Successful in 32s
PR Checks / bot-tests (pull_request) Successful in 33s
PR Checks / server-tests (pull_request) Failing after 8m57s
fix(events): carry a module's own account of a successful step
`EVENTS.md` §H told a module the revert contract accepts a `detail` on its
envelope. `classify()` reads `ok`, `retry`, `error`, `await`, `holdFor`,
`resources` and `participants` — and has never read a `detail`. So a module
that answered one was writing into nothing.

`module-uo` believed it, twice, since Phase 12b:

  * `uo.item.grant` answers `{ granted, missed, why }`
  * `uo.world.save` answers `{ started: true }`

The grant is the one that matters. A grant reaches the players a run's
participation ledger holds, and **which of them missed out is knowable only to
the module and reported nowhere else** — so an operator saw a step marked
`done` and never learned four of twelve got nothing.

Found writing the integration kit's chapter 5 (`Integration-kit#10`), whose
template made the same mistake on §H's authority.

## What this adds

`detail` becomes a real, optional member of the two SUCCESS envelopes, beside
`resources` and `participants` — on both, because `await: 'human'` is a success
and a cue's confirm finishes the step without a second dispatch, so that is the
only moment its module could ever have said anything.

**Core never interprets it.** `safeDetail()` bounds it and nothing else reads a
key out of it, here or in the runner or in the browser. That is the point: a
module knows things about its own verb core cannot compute, and it had no other
way to say them.

  * objects only — the column is JSON and the console renders keys, so a bare
    string has nothing to render under, and core inventing a key would be core
    interpreting it after all;
  * 4KB of serialised JSON, dropped rather than truncated, because half a JSON
    object is not a JSON object;
  * unserialisable (circular, a throwing `toJSON`) is dropped — reaching the
    runner would make the log INSERT throw, inside the one write documented
    never to;
  * re-parsed rather than passed through, so core holds no live reference into
    a module's object;
  * **anything wrong with it is dropped and logged, never a failure.** A step
    that did what it was asked must not be re-run because its module's
    commentary was malformed: that is a world write repeated for a log line.

The runner writes it as a `step.detail` run-log row, its own kind rather than a
field on `resource.recorded` — the grant that forced this ledgers nothing
(`reversible: 'none'`) and reports no participants, so it would have had
nowhere to ride.

## The renderer, which is half the fix

`describeLogLine`'s default returns a kind WORD, so a `step.detail` row falling
through would have rendered as the literal string "step.detail" — the channel
existing and showing nothing, exactly the failure being fixed. It gets a case
that renders whatever keys the module put there, generically: a switch on known
keys would be the browser learning one module's vocabulary.

    uo.item.grant — granted: 8, missed: 4, why: bank full, offline
    uo.world.save — started: true

**`module-uo` needs no change**: the code it already shipped starts working.

MODULE_API stays 1.10.0, amended in place — it is still on `edge`. Zero-line
route manifest diff; no route added. 2057 server tests, 400 client tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016wDDVXWMDz82WqE1i969r4
2026-09-08 18:48:57 -05:00
..