TEAMS.md §3.3, as the eighth member of MODULE_API 1.6.0 — amended in place per
the org lead, on the rule Protocol 4 was given in phase 2: a contract owes a
bump only once it has landed on `main`.
Two questions meet on the roster and they belong to different owners. WHICH
ROWS a viewer may see is the module's, because the audience rungs and their
configuration live there and core does not know what a rung is. WHAT A ROW
LOOKS LIKE stays core's.
So `projectRoster` answers with member KEYS, not rows. §3.3 said rows, and rows
would let a module widen what is published — handing back a `userId` core had
withheld — leaving core's field guarantee resting on every module's good
behaviour. Core asks which rows and re-normalises the answer through its own
public shape, so a module can narrow and cannot widen.
"The module declines" needed splitting before it could be implemented. No
module at all and a module whose rungs could not be consulted are opposite
situations: the first withholds nothing and must serve the roster whole, the
second must serve none of it. The refusal carries `projects`, and only
`projects: true` fails closed. Without the split, bare core serves an empty
roster on every Team page.
This is also the first public route whose CONTENT depends on identity, which
needed a middleware core did not have. `attachSession` only decodes a token, so
a banned account, a password change or a logout would have kept working against
the private half of a feed until the JWT expired. `optionalAuth` runs
requireAuth's full database re-validation and, on any failure, continues
ANONYMOUSLY rather than rejecting — a caller whose session is no longer good
sees the public view, which is what they are entitled to.
`GET /public/teams/:slug/activity` lands here for the same reason: §2.11's route
table had no activity endpoint though §4.3 describes a filtered feed. Paged,
with the visibility resolved from the session and never from a parameter.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
wtclaude
03631d7d40