Files
website/client/src/lib/adminNav.js
wtclaude f7d27f7a06 refactor(client): delete the UO client half (phase 3, slice 3)
35 files and 5,332 lines out — twelve public pages, seven admin views, two
player views, eight components, the two `data/` leaves and the three `lib/`
ones, plus the two tests that came with them. §2.7.1's estimate of 51 files /
~3,700 lines was measured differently and is corrected in the docs PR.

The seams core keeps, each smaller than what it replaced:

Nine rows leave the public header and six leave the admin sidebar, and both
lists are now free of `feature` gates and of `IconShard`. `moduleTitle` already
handled a module page's heading, so the six TITLES entries and the
`/admin/characters` branch of `sectionTitle` simply go.

`/player` had `PlayerCharacters` as its index — a UO page — and rather than name
a replacement or invent a landing screen it now resolves to the first row of the
portal nav this viewer can reach (`firstDestinationFor`, beside
`allowedPathsFor` and reading the BASE nav for the same reason: an override is
presentation and where everybody lands is behaviour). With the module installed
that is still Characters, so a player's first screen after signing in does not
change. Deliberately generic and deliberately not in the portal layout — the
admin index is the same question with a hardcoded answer, and if the two
logged-in areas ever become one this is what serves both.

`game_account_signup` goes with the rest of core's UO prose: the mode list, the
derived public flag, the validation and a Site Settings field whose help text
named Bridge.cfg. The row itself is untouched and module-uo reads it through
ctx.settings — the data stays, the semantics move.

KNOWN BREAK, accepted by the org lead: the shipped Android app reads
`gameAccountSignup` off `/public/settings` (PublicDto.kt:80). The field has a
`= false` default so nothing crashes; the app silently stops offering
game-account creation until it reads the module's `/public/shard/features`
instead. Out of scope here, recorded in the Android plan, and it lands well
before this workstream's cutover reaches `main`.

620 server + 161 client tests. Manifest 158 public + 2 internal, unchanged;
routes.guards unchanged. The OpenAPI spec loses exactly one property, and only
because it was hand-written in swagger.js — regeneration alone would have left
the spec documenting a field core no longer returns.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 18:39:55 -05:00

101 lines
4.7 KiB
JavaScript

// Who may see a row of the admin sidebar, and where that lets them go.
//
// Plain JS, in its own file, for two reasons. It is shared — AdminLayout renders
// by it and Admin -> Navigation builds its palette by it (THEMING_AND_NAV.md
// §8.1), and a second copy of this answer is exactly the thing this file exists
// to abolish. And it is the closest thing in the client to an authorization
// decision, so it belongs somewhere the test runner can reach, which a .jsx file
// is not.
//
// **A row's own `roles` is the whole answer.** Until Phase 2 PR 8 this was
// `roles` AND a hardcoded `MOD_PATHS` list of five paths that confined
// moderators, AND a third prefix list in the redirect effect that disagreed with
// both (docs/website/MODULE_SYSTEM.md §1.4). A module's rows could never be
// added to a list core hardcodes, which is what forced the derivation — but the
// lists had already drifted from each other without a module in sight.
/**
* Can a viewer with this role see this row?
*
* Applied AFTER the override merge in both callers: an override is presentation
* and this is the boundary, so an override saying `hidden: false` on a row this
* role cannot see still shows nothing (THEMING_AND_NAV.md §7).
*
* A row with no `roles` is visible to everyone who reached the admin area at
* all — that is the self-service case (Account, My Characters), and staff are a
* superset of players.
*/
export function navItemVisibleTo(item, role) {
return !item.roles || item.roles.includes(role)
}
/**
* The paths a viewer with this role may reach, derived from the rows they see.
*
* Takes the BASE nav, never the override-merged one: an override must not be
* able to move this boundary in either direction. Hiding a row from a
* moderator's sidebar must not also bar them from the page behind it, and
* un-hiding one must not admit them to a page their role does not carry.
*
* @param {Array<{items: Array}>} baseNav the grouped admin nav
* @param {string} role
* @returns {Array<{to: string, exact: boolean}>}
*/
export function allowedPathsFor(baseNav, role) {
return (Array.isArray(baseNav) ? baseNav : [])
.flatMap((g) => g.items || [])
.filter((item) => navItemVisibleTo(item, role))
.map((item) => ({ to: item.to, exact: item.end === true }))
}
/**
* Is this pathname one of them?
*
* A row carrying `end` matches exactly — `/admin` is the dashboard, not a prefix
* of the whole admin area, and treating it as one would let every path through.
* Every other row also covers its sub-routes, which is what keeps
* `/admin/moderation/appeals/12` and a module's detail pages reachable without
* anyone listing them.
*/
export function isAllowedPath(pathname, allowed) {
return (allowed || []).some(({ to, exact }) =>
exact ? pathname === to : pathname === to || pathname.startsWith(`${to}/`),
)
}
/**
* The first place in this nav a viewer with this role can actually go.
*
* Added in Phase 3 slice 3, for the player portal, whose index route was
* `PlayerCharacters` — a UO page. When it left, `/player` had nothing behind it,
* and the three ways out were: redirect somewhere fixed, invent a core landing
* page, or resolve the index from the nav the viewer already has. This is the
* third, and it is the only one that keeps today's behaviour — with the module
* installed the first row is still Characters, so a player still lands on their
* characters after signing in, and with nothing installed they land on Account.
*
* **From the BASE nav, never the override-merged one**, the same rule
* `allowedPathsFor` follows and for a sharper version of the same reason: an
* override is presentation, and a landing page is behaviour. An admin reordering
* the sidebar must not silently change where everybody arrives, and — more to
* the point — must not be able to move it somewhere a role cannot follow.
*
* Deliberately generic, and deliberately in this file rather than in the portal
* layout. The admin area has the same shape of question (its index is a
* hardcoded Dashboard), and the direction of travel is one logged-in area that
* shows the right things for the viewer's permissions rather than two that
* duplicate each other. When that happens this is the function it needs, and it
* already answers for both nav shapes.
*
* @param {Array} baseNav flat or grouped, before overrides
* @param {string} role
* @param {string} fallback where to go when the viewer can see nothing at all
*/
export function firstDestinationFor(baseNav, role, fallback) {
const items = (Array.isArray(baseNav) ? baseNav : []).flatMap((entry) =>
entry && Array.isArray(entry.items) ? entry.items : [entry],
)
const first = items.find((item) => item && item.to && navItemVisibleTo(item, role))
return first ? first.to : fallback
}