Files
website/client
wtclaude d667565ae7
All checks were successful
PR Checks / client-build (pull_request) Successful in 26s
PR Checks / server-tests (pull_request) Successful in 29s
PR Checks / bot-install (pull_request) Successful in 8m46s
refactor(modules): move core's UO page content behind the two slots
Core declares site.footer.status and admin.users.detail in main.jsx and fills
both itself, under owner id `core` -- the client twin of registries.registerCore()
and the same trick useShardFlags already uses. The rendered page is unchanged;
what changes is that the content now arrives the way a module's will.

The footer's Shard Status link becomes ShardStatusLink.jsx, and UserDetail's six
UO sections become UserShardSections.jsx. Both are files rather than inline
markup so that the client half of phase 3 deletes a registration and a file
instead of editing a core page under extraction pressure -- which is also what
proves the mechanism before anything depends on it.

The user-detail slot is handed userId and not scope. api.admin.userShard is a UO
binding that leaves core with the client half, so a slot passing it would hand a
module something core is about to delete; an extension builds its own client for
the routes it registered at the other end. Core's own fill now does exactly what
the module will.

Verified in a browser against a real chunk (MODULE_API.md 7.7): a throwaway
module fills both slots and renders its own label and target in the footer with
core's linkStyle, and receives userId on the admin page; a deliberate render
failure is contained to that one spot with the slot named in the console; core's
own fills leave the pages byte-identical to before; and with no module installed
both slots render nothing. Zero CSP reports throughout.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 16:45:22 -05:00
..