A cold agent was given this repo and the documents it links to, and nothing else — no core source, no module-uo — and asked to build a module for a second game. It did, in one pass. The record is docs/modules/kit-acceptance.md; this is the repair list, plus the two things it recommended that were not defects. The one it could not find, because it had no core to render against: a module page built exactly as this kit teaches renders OUTSIDE the site. PublicLayout is the chrome, not the body. Core grew an opt-in `shell` prop for it (MODULE_API_VERSION 1.5.0, website#148); the template passes shell="narrow" and chapter 2 explains why you name a width and never a class. Fixed: - **F1, and the worst of them, because it lands in the first twenty minutes.** `npm run check:swagger` failed on a PRISTINE template on Windows: the check compared the committed fragment byte-for-byte and a default Windows clone is CRLF while the generator writes LF. The message blamed "the routes or their annotations". Now `template/.gitattributes` pins `eol=lf` and the comparison normalises line endings anyway — a check may only fail for the reason it names, and this one names a diagnosis. - **F3** — `.gitea/workflows/release.yml` carries `gitea.example.com` and `your-org/your-module` under a literal `# CHANGE THESE`, was not in the rename checklist, and `checkRenameSites.js` could not match it, so CI was silent by construction. Row added, pattern widened. (The agent reported both workflow flavours; only the Gitea one is affected — GitHub supplies its own variables. Corrected in the record.) The near-miss is kept in the check's comments and its suite: the obvious widening is `example\.com`, which fires on a fixture URL in checkImports.test.js. Every alternative has to be a string that cannot occur by accident, which is the same rule that made the id `examplegame`. - **F4** — the release bundle's include list was hardcoded, so adding `server/utils/` would have silently dropped it from every release while the bundle check stayed green. Inverted to an exclusion list, in both flavours, and run by hand because a release workflow never executes in CI. - **F5** — the annotation-quoting warning was wrong in both directions, and the correction is measured rather than reasoned. A backtick is harmless (the template's own description has two spans and they survive). A `"` is not, and it does not throw: `'A "quoted" status'` is silently TRUNCATED to `A "` while swagger-autogen prints Success and the error capture sees nothing. The only signal is check:swagger blaming your routes. - **F6** — `template/.gitignore`, so a copied template that is `git init`ed inherits ignore rules instead of nothing. - **F7** — the UI kit is eight exports across five rows, not seven. The contract said seven and this kit had faithfully carried the miscount out of it. Adopted, not defects: - Chapter 1 now says to run every check on the untouched copy first. That is what found F1; without a baseline the first failure is ambiguous forever. - The template ships the §2.7 self-check the agent wrote for itself. The rule has no CI in general — an outbound socket is not statically detectable — but a module can make a decidable claim about its own tree. Ported from its code with a header explaining how to NARROW it when a sidecar client arrives, since talking to your sidecar is the expected shape and is not what §2.7 forbids. The pin moves to website edge 4ad8b2b, the 1.5.0 bump, and template/module.json declares ^1.5.0 — so checkCoreApi's equality assertion still holds and the template uses a member that exists only at that ref and later. 32 server + 18 client template tests, 21 kit-script tests, all four checks green. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
13 KiB
1. Your first module in twenty minutes
No theory in this chapter. You will copy a module that already works, rename it, build it, install it into a running core, and load a page it serves. Everything after this chapter is a change to something that runs, rather than a step toward something that might.
That order is deliberate. The module system has a lot of seams — a server entry point, a client chunk, a schema fragment, a nav registration, an OpenAPI fragment — and each one is easy to understand and unpleasant to debug in the abstract. Get all of them working at once with almost no content in them, and you can then break exactly one at a time on purpose.
What you need: a Runic Gateway core you can restart, Node 20 or newer, and about twenty minutes. You do not need core's source, and you should not read it — if this chapter cannot be followed without it, that is a bug in this chapter and worth telling us about.
The pieces you are about to copy
template/ is a whole module, in the shape a real one has. Nine things matter and
the rest is filling:
| Piece | What it is |
|---|---|
template/module.json |
The first thing core reads. Your id, your version, the core API range you need, and a declaration of every prefix you will mount. |
template/server/index.js |
The server-side handshake: one exported function, called once with (ctx, api). |
template/server/core.js |
Lazy accessors over ctx, so the rest of your server code can reach core the way ordinary code reaches a library. |
template/server/boot.js |
onBoot and onShutdown — where anything needing a live database goes. |
template/server/db/schema.sql |
Your tables. Idempotent, replayed at every boot. |
template/server/db/purge.sql |
The same tables, dropped. Run only when an operator explicitly purges you. |
template/client/src/entry.jsx |
The client-side handshake: registers your routes and your nav rows into core's SPA. |
template/client/vite.config.js |
The library build that produces the chunk core serves — and the aliases that make your React core's React. |
template/swagger-fragment.json |
Generated. Core merges it into its own API documentation. |
Two of those have a reputation. vite.config.js is the highest-risk mechanical
detail in the whole system and chapter 2 spends real time on why; module.json's
mounts is the one field people fill in wrong and discover at boot. Neither
matters yet — the template has both right.
Copy it, and make it yours
cp -r template/ ~/my-module
cd ~/my-module
Run every check on the untouched copy before you change a line. Jump ahead to Build it and run all of it — the tests, the build, the three guards — on the template exactly as it arrived:
npm ci --prefix server && npm test --prefix server
npm run check:imports --prefix server
npm run check:swagger --prefix server
npm ci --prefix client && npm run build --prefix client
npm run check:externals --prefix client && npm test --prefix client
It takes two minutes and it buys you a baseline. Every one of those commands is green on a pristine template, so from here on a red one is something you did — and you will know which edit did it, because you were green a moment ago. Without that, the first failure is ambiguous forever: is this my mistake, or was the template already like this?
That is not a hypothetical. The kit's own acceptance run
(kit-acceptance.md) found check:swagger failing on an untouched
copy on Windows, with a message that blamed the reader's routes. It is fixed, and
the reason the run found it rather than being derailed by it is that it had a
baseline.
Your module id is the single most load-bearing string in it: it is the directory
core loads you from, the key in core's database, the URL segment every one of your
pages hangs under, and the prefix every one of your tables must carry. It must
match ^[a-z][a-z0-9-]{1,31}$, and you want no hyphen in it unless you enjoy
backticking table names.
Change id in module.json first, then work down the checklist in
template/README.md — it names every file that still carries the placeholder,
and it is verified by CI in both directions, so it is not the kind
of checklist that is wrong by the second edit.
The placeholder is examplegame, not example, and that is not an aesthetic
choice. A check for a leftover example fires on the phrase "for example" in
ordinary prose, and a check that cries wolf is a check people learn to ignore. If
you build your own checks later, pick placeholder names that cannot occur by
accident.
Build it
npm ci --prefix server
npm test --prefix server
npm ci --prefix client
npm run build --prefix client # → client/dist/entry.js
npm test --prefix client
Build before you run the client tests. Two of them read the built chunk and skip when there is none, so a run in the other order passes while asking nothing about the artifact that actually ships. That ordering has bitten this project twice in two different repositories, which is why it is called out here rather than left to a CI file.
What you have now is client/dist/entry.js — a prebuilt ES module — and a server
tree that has never been compiled at all, because it does not need to be.
An operator never builds anything. That is the constraint the whole delivery path is designed around: a module arrives as a tarball with the chunk already in it, and core serves that file untouched. Your build machine is the only place a bundler ever runs.
Install it
Three supported ways, and for the next twenty minutes you want the third:
- Admin → Modules, pasting the URL of an install manifest — the JSON your release workflow publishes beside your tarball. This is how a real operator installs you.
- The
MODULESenvironment variable,<id>@<version>=<manifest URL>, for a deployment that declares its module set instead of clicking it. - A directory on the volume. Copy your whole module tree to
<website>/modules/<your-id>/and restart core.
cp -r ~/my-module <website>/modules/my-id
# restart core
Copy it. Do not symlink it. The loader lists directory entries and asks each whether it is a directory; a symlink answers no, and your module is skipped in complete silence. This is the single most common way a first install appears to do nothing at all.
Two more things that look like your module failing and are not:
- If core is running in a container, your files have to be on the volume core sees
—
MODULES_DIR(/app/modulesunder the shipped Compose file), not the repository directory next to it. - A core with a fresh database boots in maintenance mode, and public module pages sit behind the same maintenance gate core's own do. Your page will look broken while the site is not live yet.
What you should see
Restart core and read the log. A module that loaded says so:
INFO [examplegame] registered {"version":"0.1.0","routes":"public:/world"}
INFO [modules] registered module "examplegame" v0.1.0 {"mounts":{"public":["/world"]}}
INFO [modules] schema ensured for module "examplegame" {"statements":2}
INFO [examplegame:boot] booted {"refreshMs":30000}
INFO [modules] module "examplegame" started
Your two lines and core's three, interleaved: core narrates each step of your load
in its own [modules] namespace, and your logger is namespaced with your id. That
alternation is the quickest way to see how far a load got.
Then, in the browser:
/examplegame/statusrenders your page, with a World row in the public header pointing at it. That row is now an ordinary nav row: an operator can reorder it, relabel it or hide it from the nav editor exactly as they can core's./api/v1/public/world/statusanswers JSON./api/v1/public/moduleslists you, with thecapabilitiesarray from yourmodule.json. This is how a client — core's SPA, the Android app, anything — feature-detects you./api/docsshows your route under its own tag, merged out of the OpenAPI fragment you committed. (/api/docs.jsonis the raw merged document, if you would rather grep it.)- Admin → Modules shows you as
started.
Open the browser console while you are there. Your entry logs the core API version it registered against, and any complaint the client half has to make will be sitting next to it.
The state your module is in
Core keeps one row per module and its state column has five values. Four are
outcomes and one is an operator's decision:
| State | Means |
|---|---|
installed |
Files are on the volume; the row was just created. |
enabled |
Cleared for this boot to try. Every non-disabled row is reset to this at each boot. |
started |
Loaded, registered, schema replayed, onBoot returned. This is the one you want. |
startup_failed |
Something went wrong; the panel shows the stage and the reason. The site came up anyway. |
disabled |
An operator switched you off. Nothing else — not a failure, not a reinstall — moves this. |
The important half of that table is what it implies: a module that fails to load never takes the site down. Core try/catches your entire lifecycle, records where you broke, and serves everything else. You are debugging from an admin screen, not from a stack trace in a crash loop.
A retry is a restart. Every boot resets non-disabled rows to enabled and
writes that boot's outcome, so the panel always describes the run you are looking
at rather than a run from last week.
The four ways it fails
When something is wrong, the shape of the failure tells you where to look before you read a single message.
1. Your module is not in the panel at all. The loader never saw a directory
worth scanning. It is a symlink; or it is in the wrong place; or it has no
module.json at the top of it. Note the bundle shape here — a release tarball's
top-level directory is <name>-<version>, so an unpacked bundle copied wholesale
leaves core looking at a directory with nothing in it but another directory.
2. It is startup_failed, and your routes and nav are simply absent. The
failure happened before anything was mounted: a malformed module.json, an
unsatisfiable coreApi, a prefix that collides with core's, a schema fragment
breaking a rule. Nothing of yours is on the URL surface, so nothing of yours can
half-work.
3. It is startup_failed, and your routes answer 503. The failure happened
after mounting — the database rejected a statement in your fragment, or your
onBoot threw. Your routes stay mounted deliberately: the URL surface is a
property of what is installed, not of whether a boot hook succeeded on this
machine. A module that failed to warm up says it is down; it does not serve half
its data.
4. It answers 404 everywhere. Someone disabled you. Same mechanism — mounted
and guarded, never unmounted.
The panel names the stage each failure happened in, and the stages are the
loader's own validation steps, listed in MODULE_API.md §4.3 and §4.4. Read
the stage first; it is usually enough. Core logs the same thing at boot —
module "…" failed to load — continuing without it {"stage":…,"reason":…} — so you
do not need the panel to debug this.
In all four cases you disappear from /api/v1/public/modules. That endpoint
answers what this backend is serving, so a client feature-detecting your
capability renders a site without it rather than one advertising something that
503s. It is also a quick check with no login: if you are not in that list, you
are not running, whatever the page looks like.
What to do next
You have a module. Now break it on purpose, once each, and watch what the panel says:
- Add a prefix to
module.json'smountsand do not register it. → stageregister, "declared public/extra but never registered it". What you declared and what you registered must match, in both directions. - Rename one of your tables so it no longer starts with your id. → stage
schema, at load time, before anything is mounted: your routes answer404. - Throw inside
onBoot. → after mounting, so the same route answers503with "Module unavailable" instead of vanishing.
Those are the three outcomes above, and the messages are what this core actually prints for them — they were run to write this paragraph rather than predicted.
Twenty minutes of that is worth more than any chapter, because every one of those failures is one you will cause accidentally later, and you will recognise it.
Then read chapter 2, which is the same module explained —
what ctx hands you and why it is handed rather than imported, what each
register* call is for, why the client half is built the way it is, and what a
module must never do.