docs(installer): review the patched region, not the whole-file hash

The patch tier refused on a whole-file hash mismatch, which is the wrong
question: the three patches touch three small regions of three large files, so
an operator who edited Logging.cs somewhere else entirely was handed a manual
patch job they did not need. Hand-modified shards are the norm, so that refusal
covered most of the audience.

Replace the single hash test with a four-rung ladder (PLAN §2.2.1), cheapest and
safest first:

  0  post-patch text already present  -> no-op, keeps re-runs idempotent
  1  whole file matches the pre-image -> apply verbatim
  2  file differs, patched region is still byte-identical -> apply at the
     matched offset
  3  anything else -> do not touch the file; print the hunk to apply by hand

Rung 2 needs no new metadata: a unified diff already carries the stock text of
the region it edits (context lines plus the '-' lines). Guardrails keep it from
becoming a fuzzy apply -- exact match with only CRLF/trailing-whitespace
normalisation, exactly one occurrence or it fails, line numbers advisory only,
and all-or-nothing per patch file so a half-patched EventSink.cs cannot happen.
install.json records which rung applied each patch, and doctor and uninstall
report it.

This retires the blanket 57.4-only version gate, so PLAN gains §2.2.2 to draw
the line the ladder does not: content matching is a mechanical guarantee about
where text lands, not a support commitment. 57.4 stays the only supported
version. A non-57.4 tree may attempt the tier, but unsupported, untested and not
guaranteed -- behind a loud banner, a prompt defaulted to no, and its own
--patches-unsupported-servuo flag, because a bare --patches can be hit by
accident in a copied script. The unsupported marker persists into install.json,
every later doctor run, and the uninstall report.

INSTALL.md gets the operator-facing half: a block-quoted warning naming the
silent-script-build failure mode, the updated prerequisite row, prompts and flag
table, and a sample run showing all three outcomes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-04 14:17:33 -05:00
parent d5838f7d4c
commit 5a6cb58a33
2 changed files with 152 additions and 18 deletions

View File

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Only the sidecar is exposed, and only to your website.
| Requirement | Detail |
|---|---|
| A working ServUO install | It must currently boot and compile scripts cleanly. The installer deploys onto a healthy shard; it does not repair a broken one. |
| ServUO **57.4** *(patch tier only)* | The base install works on any reasonably current ServUO. The patch tier is verified against stock 57.4 only, and is skipped with a warning on anything else. |
| ServUO **57.4** *(patch tier only)* | **57.4 is the only supported version.** The base install works on any reasonably current ServUO. The patch tier is written and tested against stock 57.4; on any other version it is **unsupported and untested** — you can still choose to run it, behind an explicit opt-in, and it applies only where the exact lines it patches are unchanged. See [§4](#4-the-patch-tier-optional). |
| ServUO **stopped** | `ServUO.exe` holds a lock on `Scripts.dll` and writes `Saves/` on exit. The installer refuses to deploy under a running shard. |
| Administrator / root | It writes into system directories and registers a service. |
| Outbound HTTPS | To `gitea.whitlocktech.com`, to fetch the bundle and the two artifacts. Nothing inbound is needed, and no Gitea account or git client is required. |
@@ -140,8 +140,9 @@ one file); `doctor`, `update` and `uninstall` are run from it later. Examples be
1. **Your ServUO root** — detected if the installer is run from inside it or from an obvious
sibling, otherwise prompted. A directory qualifies only if it contains `ServUO.exe`, `Scripts/`
and `Config/`.
2. **Whether to apply the patch tier** — off unless you say yes, and not offered at all if your
ServUO is not 57.4. See [§4](#4-the-patch-tier-optional).
2. **Whether to apply the patch tier** — off unless you say yes. On a ServUO that is not 57.4 the
prompt defaults to **no** and carries an unsupported-version warning you have to answer past.
See [§4](#4-the-patch-tier-optional).
3. **The hostname your website should use to reach this machine** — used only to compose the two
URLs it prints at the end. The sidecar's bind address is frequently `127.0.0.1` or `0.0.0.0`,
neither of which is something to hand to a website.
@@ -201,7 +202,8 @@ reports "unchanged" and writes nothing.
| `--verify` | `install`, `update` | Dry run. Report every change that would be made; write nothing. |
| `--servuo <path>` | `install`, `doctor`, `update` | Name the ServUO root instead of detecting or prompting. |
| `--bundle <tag>` | `install`, `update` | Pin an exact published bundle instead of the current one. |
| `--patches` / `--no-patches` | `install` | Decide the patch tier non-interactively. `--patches` still refuses on a non-57.4 tree. |
| `--patches` / `--no-patches` | `install` | Decide the patch tier non-interactively. `--patches` never loosens the region check: patches whose target lines are not stock are reported for you to apply by hand, not forced. |
| `--patches-unsupported-servuo` | `install` | Required *in addition to* `--patches` to run the patch tier on a ServUO that is not 57.4. Unsupported and untested — see [§4](#4-the-patch-tier-optional). Ignored on 57.4. |
| `--host <name>` | `install` | The hostname to print in the website URLs. |
| `--site-url <url>` | `install` | Your site's base URL, for the Admin → Shard link. |
| `--yes` | all | Assume the default answer to every prompt. Combine with the flags above for an unattended run. |
@@ -272,15 +274,62 @@ How the installer handles it:
- **Opt-in.** The base install completes without it, and declining is a supported outcome, not a
degraded one.
- **Dry-run first, always.** Every patch is checked (`git apply --check`) before anything is
applied, and reported per patch. Most real shards are hand-modified; a patch that does not apply
is expected, not alarming.
- **Dry-run first, always.** Every patch is checked before anything is applied, and reported per
patch. Most real shards are hand-modified; a patch that does not apply is expected, not alarming.
- **A modified file is not automatically a refusal.** These patches touch three small regions of
three large files. If you have edited `Logging.cs` somewhere else entirely, the installer says so
and still applies the patch — it checks whether *the lines the patch edits* are still stock, not
whether the whole file is. It applies only where the surrounding lines match the patch exactly and
appear exactly once; anything less and it stops and hands you the hunk to apply by hand. It never
force-fits a patch by loosening the match.
- **All or nothing per feature.** The two vendor-sale patches are one unit and are applied together
or not at all.
- **Skipped entirely on a ServUO that is not 57.4**, with a warning. Unverified diffs are never
applied to an unknown tree.
or not at all — and within a patch, if one hunk cannot be placed safely, none are.
- **Your ServUO version is reported, not decisive** — but see the warning below before running this
on anything other than 57.4.
- **Recorded, and the `.patch` files cached**, so re-runs stay idempotent and `uninstall` can print
the exact hunks to revert.
the exact hunks to revert — along with how each was applied, since a patch placed into a file you
had already modified is one to look at more carefully when reverting.
### ⚠ On any ServUO that is not 57.4: unsupported, untested, no guarantees
> **Runic Gateway is designed, built and tested against stock ServUO 57.4.** That is the only
> supported version.
>
> On any other version — a newer release, an older one, or a fork — the patch tier is
> **UNSUPPORTED, UNTESTED, and NOT GUARANTEED TO WORK.** You may run it. If you do, you are on your
> own: it is not covered by support, and a bad outcome may not show up until your shard is live,
> because ServUO's script build reports success even when it failed and quietly keeps running the
> previous `Scripts.dll`.
>
> The installer will still refuse to place a patch anywhere the exact lines it edits have changed —
> but matching text is not the same as matching behaviour. A hunk can land correctly and still be
> wrong for a tree that has diverged around it.
>
> **Back up your ServUO tree first, and verify your shard boots and compiles afterwards.**
Because of that, on a non-57.4 tree the tier is off by default and takes a deliberate yes:
- the interactive prompt defaults to **no** and prints the warning above;
- `--patches` on its own is **not** enough — an unattended run must also pass
`--patches-unsupported-servuo`;
- the choice is recorded, and `doctor` keeps showing an unsupported-version row for the life of the
install — so whoever looks after this shard next can see it without being told.
A run where the tier is selected on a shard that has been worked on looks like this:
```
Patch tier 2 of 3 applied
✓ playervendor-sale-eventsink Server/EventSink.cs stock file
✓ playervendor-sale-gump Scripts/Gumps/PlayerVendorGumps.cs
file modified, patched region stock — applied at line 1180
✗ commandlogging-event Scripts/Commands/Logging.cs
patched region has been modified — not applied
apply this hunk by hand, then re-run install:
/etc/runicgateway/patches/commandlogging-event.patch
⚠ Server/EventSink.cs changed — rebuild the core: dotnet build ServUO.sln
Without commandlogging-event: no in-game moderation audit forwarding.
```
If it is skipped or fails, you lose exactly two things — **`vendor.sale` events** and **in-game
moderation audit forwarding**. Everything else works. You can apply the patches later by hand (see
@@ -400,7 +449,7 @@ first thing a maintainer will want.
```
✓ ServUO found /opt/ServUO (57.4)
✓ Overlay in sync 24 files, all hashes match install.json
⚠ Patch tier 1 of 3 applied — vendor.sale unavailable
⚠ Patch tier 1 of 3 applied (region-match) — vendor.sale unavailable
✓ uo-link installed 1.1.0
✓ Service running, enabled
✓ Sidecar reachable 127.0.0.1:8080 /health ok