wtclaude
5a6cb58a33
The patch tier refused on a whole-file hash mismatch, which is the wrong
question: the three patches touch three small regions of three large files, so
an operator who edited Logging.cs somewhere else entirely was handed a manual
patch job they did not need. Hand-modified shards are the norm, so that refusal
covered most of the audience.
Replace the single hash test with a four-rung ladder (PLAN §2.2.1), cheapest and
safest first:
0 post-patch text already present -> no-op, keeps re-runs idempotent
1 whole file matches the pre-image -> apply verbatim
2 file differs, patched region is still byte-identical -> apply at the
matched offset
3 anything else -> do not touch the file; print the hunk to apply by hand
Rung 2 needs no new metadata: a unified diff already carries the stock text of
the region it edits (context lines plus the '-' lines). Guardrails keep it from
becoming a fuzzy apply -- exact match with only CRLF/trailing-whitespace
normalisation, exactly one occurrence or it fails, line numbers advisory only,
and all-or-nothing per patch file so a half-patched EventSink.cs cannot happen.
install.json records which rung applied each patch, and doctor and uninstall
report it.
This retires the blanket 57.4-only version gate, so PLAN gains §2.2.2 to draw
the line the ladder does not: content matching is a mechanical guarantee about
where text lands, not a support commitment. 57.4 stays the only supported
version. A non-57.4 tree may attempt the tier, but unsupported, untested and not
guaranteed -- behind a loud banner, a prompt defaulted to no, and its own
--patches-unsupported-servuo flag, because a bare --patches can be hit by
accident in a copied script. The unsupported marker persists into install.json,
every later doctor run, and the uninstall report.
INSTALL.md gets the operator-facing half: a block-quoted warning naming the
silent-script-build failure mode, the updated prerequisite row, prompts and flag
table, and a sample run showing all three outcomes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Runic Gateway — Documentation
Central documentation for the Runic Gateway platform. The docs here were extracted from the two code repositories (with full commit history preserved) so they live in one place, independent of either codebase.
Layout
website/ docs from the shard website (Node/Express + MariaDB + React/Vite)
link/ docs from the ServUO bridge (C# plugin + Rust sidecar + Node WS)
android/ docs from the native Android client (Kotlin + Jetpack Compose)
installer/ docs for the installer that deploys a shard's bridge components
ci/ cross-cutting CI/quality notes
website/
| Doc | What it covers |
|---|---|
| BACKEND_DESIGN.md | API contract, DB schema, security model |
| HERO_EDITOR.md | Hero canvas editor feature spec |
| WIKI_UPGRADE.md | Wiki subsystem upgrade notes |
| SHARD_VISIBILITY.md | Who sees which shard data — the admin-configurable audience framework |
| SPAWN_ATLAS.md | The bestiary / spawn atlas: what the shard contains, parsed from its own ServUO tree |
| CLILOCS.md | UO's id → name table: converting one from your client so items have names |
| UOFIDDLER.md | Operator runbook — step-by-step extraction from your own UO client (cliloc table, creature art) |
| MARKETPLACE.md | The player-vendor index: how it is gathered, what it costs, how to tune it |
| website-README.md | Snapshot of the website repo's README (setup/run reference) |
| PROJECT_TREE.md | Auto-generated snapshot of the repo's tracked file layout |
link/
| Doc | What it covers |
|---|---|
| INTEGRATION.md | How the website integrates with the uo-link sidecar |
| PROTOCOL_2.md | Protocol 2.0 / 2.1 design |
| v3.md | Protocol 3.0 design — shard content/standings streams + the visibility framework |
| ADMIN_CONTROLS.md | Staff write-plane (kick/ban/broadcast, page queue) |
| SHARD_PREREQS.md | Shard-side prerequisites for the bridge |
| PLAN.md | uo-link build plan |
| RESEARCH.md | Research notes |
| link-README.md | Snapshot of the link repo's README |
| PROJECT_TREE.md | Auto-generated snapshot of the repo's tracked file layout |
android/
| Doc | What it covers |
|---|---|
| PLAN.md | Android client build plan / milestones |
| COVERAGE_PLAN.md | Test-coverage rollout plan |
| APP_LINKS.md | Android App Links / deep-link setup |
| theme-plan.md | Theming plan |
| TRUSTED_DEVICES_APP_HANDOFF.md | Trusted-devices app handoff notes |
| PROJECT_TREE.md | Auto-generated snapshot of the repo's tracked file layout |
installer/
| Doc | What it covers |
|---|---|
| INSTALL.md | Operator guide — installing Runic Gateway on a ServUO shard, connecting it to the website, and diagnosing it. Includes the by-hand path, which works today |
| PLAN.md | Installer design of record — phases, locked decisions, the bundle/compat-matrix model |
Provenance
website/*was extracted fromRunicGateway/websiteviagit filter-repo.link/*was extracted fromRunicGateway/linkviagit filter-repo.
Commit history and authorship for each doc are preserved. The two source repos retain a short pointer to this repo in their own READMEs; the authoritative copy of each document now lives here.
License
Runic Gateway's documentation is free: licensed under the GNU General Public License v3.0 or later — see LICENSE.md.
Copyright (C) 2026 Runic Gateway
This documentation is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY. You may redistribute and/or modify it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation,
either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
Contributions are welcome — please read CONTRIBUTING.md (note the AI-usage disclosure requirement) and our Code of Conduct.