docs/website/ACCOUNT_DELETION.md

# Account deletion — a member deletes their own account, on the website and in the app

**Status:** plan of record, 2026-10-29, with every question answered (AD4-AD13). **§6 step 2
(core) built 2026-10-29** and merged as website#232 (`7bd93b8`), `MODULE_API` 1.20.0. **Step 3
(modules and kit) built 2026-10-30**; steps 4-6 are next. Each phase in §6 stops for the org lead before the next one starts.

**Why now.** Google Play's Data safety form asks whether the app lets people create an account, and
an app that does must let them delete it, both **in the app** and at a **web address** given to Play
(`android/PLAN.md` M8, step 2). The app starts accounts in two places: the sign-in screen's link to
the deployment's sign-up page, and in-app game-account creation where a game server offers it
(`PlayerShardApi.createAccount`). The platform had no self-service deletion: only an admin could
delete an account. The org lead chose to build it (AD1) and to do it **before** report, block and
hide (`USER_SAFETY.md`), so it takes the next `MODULE_API` minor.

## 1. What a member can do

| Where | What they see | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| Website, *Account* (`PlayerAccount.jsx`) | a *Delete my account* section at the bottom: what goes, what stays (§4.1), and a confirm step | the account is deleted at once (AD4), the member is signed out everywhere, and the site says so |
| App, *Account* (`AccountScreen.kt`) | the same section and the same confirm step | the same, and the app clears what it holds on the phone, as a sign-out does |
| runicgateway.com `/delete-account/` | how to do it on the website or in the app, what is deleted and what is kept, and who to ask when you cannot sign in | nothing; it is the page whose address Play is given (AD2) |

The confirm step asks for the account's password, and for a two-factor code when the account has
two-factor sign-in on. It also asks the member to type their username, so a mis-tap on a phone
cannot delete an account. Signing in with Google, Discord or Steam is a convenience on top of an
account that already has its own password (AD7), so the password is always the proof.

Every member can delete themself, staff included. The one refusal is the **last admin**, as the
admin route already refuses. Then a deployment would be left with no one who can run it.

## 2. Decisions (org lead, 2026-10-29)

- **AD1 — Build self-service deletion.** The org lead chose this over an explanation page alone,
  and over removing the app's account-creation links. A member deletes their account on the
  website and in the app, and that removes the account and its game links.
- **AD2 — runicgateway.com hosts the deletion page Play is given.** We publish the app, so
  Play needs one address from us. Every deployment runs its own site, so that page explains the
  steps rather than performing them.
- **AD3 — Before report, block and hide.** It takes `MODULE_API` **1.20.0**, and
  `USER_SAFETY.md`'s `reportTargets` moves to 1.21.0.

The org lead's answers to the six questions in §5, the same day:

- **AD4 — Delete now** (Q1). There is no grace period. The typed username and the password are
  the safeguard.
- **AD5 — What they wrote stays, attributed to "[deleted player]"** (Q2). For members, every
  username snapshot of a deleted account reads "[deleted player]": their threads, posts and
  uploads, and the records in gap 2. That label replaces today's "[deleted account]".
- **AD6 — Staff keep the name and the IP** (Q3). The snapshots and the activity log's IP
  addresses stay in the database, and the staff views keep showing them, marked as a deleted
  account, for moderation. So AD5 is a rule about what members see, not a change to the stored
  rows.
- **AD7 — The password is the proof** (Q4). SSO is a convenience. A member must already have a
  proper account before they can link a sign-in provider, so every account has its own password,
  and the confirm step always asks for it. An account that somehow has no password is told to set
  one first, on the same Account page.
- **AD8 — A UO game account stays on the shard** (Q5). Only the link goes. The shard's staff
  handle the shard account like any other. There is no protocol change.
- **AD9 — A deleted staff account's username is never available again** (Q6). It can never be
  registered, or taken by a username change. A player's username is free at once.

Asked after the plan was first written ("will deletion call the unlink function for that
player?"), the same day:

- **AD10 — Deletion unlinks through each module's own unlink, before the row goes.** A database
  cascade is not an unlink. For UO, the link lives on the shard (gap 8), so dropping the site's
  mirror would leave the shard attributing the game account to a user who no longer exists. The
  hook is therefore `onUserDeleting` and runs before the delete. Each module calls the unlink it
  already has, for every link the person holds, so the game sees exactly what a player's own
  unlink produces.
- **AD11 — An unlink that cannot finish never holds up the deletion.**
  - A shard that is offline (503) gets a pending unlink in the module, retried when the bridge
    reconnects.
  - A **protected staff account**, which the shard refuses to unlink (403), is logged and shown to
    admins as *still linked on the shard*, for the shard's staff to clear by hand.

Asked while building core (§6 step 2), the same day:

- **AD12 — A wrong password or code is 400, not 401.** §4.1 first said 401. In the app, a 401 on a
  signed-in call goes to `TokenAuthenticator`, which spends the refresh token and replays the request
  with the same body: one typo would make two password attempts, both counted by the login backoff, and
  a failed refresh would sign the member out mid-deletion. Every other self-service password check
  already answers 400, so deletion does too, with `code: 'wrong_password'` or `'wrong_code'`.
- **AD13 — A deleted account drops off a Team's *Forum guests* list.** Its grant row stays (the id is
  set NULL) and the staff grant ledger still shows it with the name, marked deleted. A grant is matched
  by user id, so a deleted account cannot use it and is not a guest.

## 3. What exists today (read 2026-10-29, website `main` 222bcb0)

- **The admin route.** `DELETE /api/v1/admin/users/:id` refuses your own account and the last admin,
  then `users.remove(id)`, a plain `DELETE`. Everything else is the schema's foreign keys.
- **What the foreign keys already do.** Of the 59 keys that reference `users(id)`:
  - **CASCADE** removes what belongs to the account alone: linked sign-in identities, mobile
    refresh tokens and SSO codes, revoked sessions, trusted devices, recovery codes, password
    resets, email verifications, push devices, notification subscriptions and channel prefs,
    in-app notifications, and the engagement outbox, cooldowns and digest state.
  - **SET NULL** detaches what the member made from them: news posts, wiki edits, forum threads,
    posts and uploads, reports filed, appeals, Team activity, event participation, engagement
    send logs, and the activity log.
  - Modules: Module-uo's `shard_account_links`, and Module-Rust's `rust_account_links`,
    `rust_perm_group_members`, `rust_perm_grants`, `rust_perm_run_grants` and
    `rust_permgroup_members`, all **CASCADE**. Module-Rust's grants and group memberships keyed
    straight to a Steam id (`rust_perm_steam_grants`, `rust_permgroup_steam_members`) have no
    site account behind them, and stay. Staff gave them to a player in the game, not to a member
    of the site. **A cascade is not an unlink, though** (gap 8, AD10).
- **Sessions die at once.** `requireAuth` re-reads the user on every request and answers 401 when
  the row is gone (`session.middleware.js`). So a deleted member's web cookie or mobile access
  token stops working on its next use, without waiting for it to expire.
- **Rust permissions are withdrawn in the game by themselves.** `permSync.js` compares a digest of
  the desired set with what each server last confirmed. When the grant rows cascade away, the digest
  changes, and the next tick pushes the set with the withdrawn grants.
- **Teams follow on the next reconcile.** `team_members.user_id` is SET NULL. The roster belongs to
  the module and re-syncs every 15 minutes (`TEAMS.md`).

**The gaps:**
1. There is no self-service route, and no screen on the web or in the app.
2. **Their username survives in snapshot columns.** The Teams tables store a username next to the
   user id, deliberately, so a record still names someone after the account is gone.
   `teamForum.model.js` shows "[deleted account]" only when the snapshot is empty too. There are
   two kinds:
   - **What they wrote:** `team_forum_threads.created_username`,
     `team_forum_posts.author_username`, `team_forum_uploads.uploader_username`.
   - **Records of what was done:**
     - `content_reports.reporter_username` and `handled_username`
     - `team_forum_moderation.actor_username`
     - `team_forum_grants.username`, `granted_username` and `revoked_username`
     - `team_leader_overrides.actor_username`
     - `team_moderation_requests.requested_username` and `decided_username`
3. **The activity log keeps IP addresses.** Rows for the deleted member keep `ip`, and `detail`
   can carry a username, with only `user_id` cleared. They stay, for staff (AD6).
4. **A module cannot learn that a user was deleted.** If a module keeps user data without a
   foreign key, or has a side effect in the game, it has no hook. The Module API has
   `onIdentityLinked`, but nothing for deletion.
5. **A game account the app created stays on the game server.** For UO the link cascades, but the
   shard account and its characters remain, which is intended (AD8).
6. The demo's four accounts (`demo/mode.js`) must not be deletable.
7. **Nothing stops a deleted name being reused.** Registration and username changes only check
   the live `users` table (AD9).
8. **A cascade skips the modules' unlink, and for UO that leaves the shard linked.**
   - **UO:** `shard_account_links` is only a mirror. The shard keeps the site user id on the game
     account (`INTEGRATION.md`: "permanently tagged with your `websiteUserId`"), and every
     `mob.login` reports it as `webId`. That is why the staff unlink in `usersShard.controller.js`
     calls the sidecar's `DELETE /link/{account}` first and drops the mirror after. A cascade
     alone would leave the shard, and the sidecar's own link mirror, attributing the account to a
     deleted user forever, with every login still carrying that `webId`.
   - **Rust:** the site's `rust_account_links` is the only record; the plugin keeps no link state.
     The cascade gets the same result as `links.unlinkOwned`, apart from its
     `rust.account.unlink` log entry and its prompt Teams re-sync. Calling the real function keeps
     both.

## 4. Design

### 4.1 Core (`website`)

- **One service, two routes.** A new `accountDeletion.deleteAccount(userId, { req, by })` holds
  the whole procedure. The admin route's `users.remove(id)` call is replaced by it, so a deletion
  by staff and a deletion by the member do the same thing.
- **The member's route.** `DELETE /api/v1/auth/me/account`, behind `requireAuth` and
  `accountChangeLimiter`.
  - Body: `{ username, password, code?, recoveryCode? }`.
  - The typed `username` must match the account, ignoring case.
  - The password is always checked (AD7).
  - A two-factor code or a recovery code is checked when two-factor sign-in is on.
  - Refusals, each with a `code`:
    - 400 `username_mismatch` for a username that doesn't match
    - 400 `wrong_password`, `code_required` or `wrong_code` (AD12: 400, never 401)
    - 409 `password_required` for an account with no password: the screen points at the
      Account page's set-a-password section, which already exists for that case
    - 409 `last_admin` for the last admin
    - the demo's own refusal for a demo account (`demo/mode.js`, the same lock other breaking
      settings use)
  - `#swagger.*` annotations; the spec is regenerated.
- **The procedure, in order:**
  1. **Before the delete**, read what is needed afterwards: the email address (for the notice
     below), the username and the role. Then run every module's `onUserDeleting` hook (below), in
     turn, each in its own `try`. That is where game links are unlinked (AD10).
  2. **In one transaction:**
     - when the role is staff (anything but `player`), add the username to a new
       `reserved_usernames` table (AD9)
     - delete the `users` row, so the foreign keys do the rest. The snapshot columns, the
       content and the activity log are **not** touched (AD5, AD6).
  3. **After commit**, fire-and-forget, each in its own `try`:
     - `teams.reconcile({ reason: 'account deleted' })`
     - an activity-log entry, `user.delete` (by staff) or `user.self_delete`, naming the id and
       never the username
     - an email to the address read in step 1, when there was one and mail is configured:
       "your account on <site> was deleted on <date>". This is the only notice a person gets
       if someone else used their unlocked phone, and it says who to contact.
  - **Nothing can stop a deletion once it starts.** A module hook that throws, or that takes too
    long, is logged, and the deletion goes ahead, because Play requires the request to be
    honoured. Core gives each hook a time limit (10 seconds) so a hung game server cannot hold a
    member's request open; whatever the module had not finished is its pending work (AD11).
- **Who sees the name (AD5, AD6).** A snapshot whose id column is now NULL belongs to a deleted
  account; nothing else clears those ids. Rendering follows the viewer:
  - **Members**, Team leaders included, and signed-out visitors see `[deleted player]`. That
    covers forum threads, posts and uploads, and any record a member can read. The constant in
    `teamForum.model.js` and `contentReports.model.js` changes from `[deleted account]`, and the
    "id NULL" case now wins over a present snapshot.
  - **Staff** (admin, editor, moderator) see the stored username with a *deleted account*
    marker, in the Reports queue, the forum's moderation views, the user and activity screens,
    and Team moderation requests. The activity log keeps its IP addresses.
  - The rule lives in one helper, `displayAuthor(row, viewer)`, which every model that renders a
    snapshot uses, and its tests cover each table in gap 2.
- **`reserved_usernames`** (AD9) holds `username_norm` (the primary key, lowercased), `reason`
  (`deleted_staff`) and `reserved_at`. Registration, an invite's acceptance, an admin creating an
  account, and a username change all refuse a reserved name, with the same message as a taken
  one. There is no release path, because the org lead said "completely unavailable". A player's
  username is not added and is free at once.
- **`MODULE_API` 1.20.0: `api.onUserDeleting(async ({ userId, deletedBy }) => {})`**, where
  `deletedBy` is `'self' | 'staff'`.
  - It runs **before** the row goes, while the module can still read the person's links (AD10).
    Its job is to undo in the game, and anywhere else the module holds state, what the site's
    rows are about to stop saying: unlink each game link through the module's own unlink, and
    clean up data kept without a foreign key.
  - It cannot veto. Throwing, or running past core's time limit, is logged, and the deletion
    goes ahead (AD11). A module that cannot finish keeps its own record of what is left, and
    retries.
  - It is the same staging and validation as `onIdentityLinking`.
  - `MODULE_API.md` §2.4 and §2.5 are amended. The Integration Kit's `coreApi` check goes red
    until it is re-pinned, which is how the kit is meant to notice.
- **What goes and what stays** is written once in `BACKEND_DESIGN.md`, and the screens and the
  runicgateway.com page say the same in plain words:
  - **Goes:** the account, password, email address, two-factor secret and recovery codes; every
    session, trusted device and push registration; linked Google, Discord, OIDC and Steam sign-ins;
    game-account links and, in Rust, the permissions and groups the site gave those Steam ids;
    notification settings and the inbox.
  - **Stays, shown to other members as "[deleted player]":** what you wrote where others read it
    (AD5), and reports you filed and appeals you made, as moderation records.
  - **Stays, and staff can still see who it was:** the same records with your username, and the
    activity log with its IP addresses, for moderation (AD6). Kept until the operator removes
    them.
  - **Stays, detached:** event results (the score and the in-game name, no site account), the
    delivery log's hashes and the suppression list (`collection.mjs` already says so).
  - **If you were staff:** your username can never be used again (AD9).
- **Docs:** `BACKEND_DESIGN.md` (the route, the procedure, `reserved_usernames`, the
  display rule, the list above), `TEAMS.md` (the forum's deleted-author rule), `MODULE_API.md`,
  OpenAPI.

### 4.2 Website client

- **`PlayerAccount.jsx`** gets a *Delete my account* section, last on the page and visually set
  apart. It holds the "what goes, what stays" text and a button that opens a confirm dialog with
  the username, password and (if needed) code fields. *Delete* stays disabled until the username
  matches.
- **On success**, the client clears its session state and lands on the home page with a notice:
  "Your account has been deleted."
- **On the demo** the section shows, and its button is disabled with the demo's usual locked
  wording, so a reviewer can see the feature exists.

### 4.3 Android app (`edge`)

- **`AccountScreen.kt`** gets a *Delete my account* row that opens a new screen with the same text
  and fields, and `MeApi.deleteAccount(body)`.
- **On success** the app does what a sign-out does, without the logout call, because the server
  has already dropped everything. It clears the tokens, the trusted-device token, the push
  registration and the inbox snapshot, then returns to sign-in with "Your account has been
  deleted."
- **On the demo** the server refuses, and `demoLockInterceptor` shows the usual locked message.
  The row is still visible, which is what Play's reviewer needs to find.

### 4.4 Modules

- **Module-Rust (`edge`):**
  - `onUserDeleting` calls `links.unlinkOwned(steamId, userId)` for each Steam id the person
    holds, the same call the player's own unlink makes. That keeps its `rust.account.unlink`
    entry (with `detail.reason: 'account deleted'`) and its Teams re-sync.
  - It then marks the permission sync dirty, so withdrawn grants reach the game on the next tick
    rather than waiting for the digest check.
  - It never fails on the game: the link is the site's own record and the plugin keeps none, so
    there is nothing pending.
  - Core-ref pin.
- **Module-uo:**
  - `onUserDeleting` calls the staff unlink's path for each game account in
    `shard_account_links`: `uoLinkClient.unlinkAccount({ actor, account })`, where `actor` is
    `web:account-deletion`, then `shardLinks.removeByAccount(account)` on success. That clears
    the shard's `WebsiteUserId` tag, so attribution stops at once. The shard account and its
    characters stay (AD8).
  - **Shard offline** (503, or no sidecar configured): the account goes into a new
    `shard_pending_unlinks` table (`account`, `queued_at`, `attempts`, `last_error`), and the
    mirror row goes with the cascade. The module retries the queue at boot and whenever the
    bridge reconnects, until the shard answers 200 or 404 (404 means the shard has nothing to
    clear).
  - **Protected staff account** (403): the shard refuses by design, so retrying will not help.
    The account goes into the same table marked `refused`. Admin → Shard shows it as *still
    linked on the shard* until shard staff clear it by hand, and the module drops the row once
    the shard stops reporting that `webId`.
  - Core-ref pin.
- **Integration Kit:** the re-pin, and a paragraph in the module chapter. `onUserDeleting` is
  where a module unlinks anything a game holds for the person, through its own unlink, and cleans
  up data kept with no foreign key. It can't stop the deletion, so a module that talks to a game
  needs a retry for when the game is away.

### 4.5 runicgateway.com

- **`/delete-account/`**, the page Play is given (AD2). It covers:
  - the app's name and ours
  - the steps on the website and in the app
  - what is deleted and what is kept, and for how long: the moderation records that stay, and
    that other members see "[deleted player]"
  - that we hold no account, because each community runs its own site
  - what to do if you cannot sign in: ask that community's operator, who can delete the account
    from the admin panel
- **The data, written once.** The page's facts become `deployment` rows in `collection.mjs`, so
  `/privacy` and the page agree. `PLAY_DATA_SAFETY.md`'s account-deletion bullet then names the URL
  and answers "yes" to "can users request deletion".

## 5. The questions, as they were asked and answered (org lead, 2026-10-29)

| | Asked, with the example given | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Delete now, or lock for 14 days and let a sign-in cancel it? (a player taps *Delete* at 2 a.m. after a bad raid) | **Delete now** (AD4) |
| Q2 | Keep what they wrote, anonymously, or delete it? (a forum guide with 40 replies) | **Keep it; every username snapshot reads "[deleted player]"** (AD5) |
| Q3 | Keep or clear the activity log's IPs and the moderation snapshots? (a banned player returns under a new name) | **Keep the name and the IP on the admin side, for moderation** (AD6) |
| Q4 | How does an account with no password confirm? (a Discord-only player) | **Every account already has a password; SSO is a convenience on top of a proper account** (AD7) |
| Q5 | What happens to a UO game account the app created? (`Thorne`, with three characters) | **Leave it on the shard** (AD8) |
| Q6 | Can a deleted username be taken at once? (a moderator `Ravenna` impersonated the next day) | **Staff names are completely unavailable** (AD9) |

## 6. Build order

1. **This plan** (docs), with the answers (AD4-AD9).
2. **Core** (`website`): §4.1 and §4.2, `MODULE_API` 1.20.0, tests (the service's procedure, the
   route's refusals, the demo lock, a module hook that throws, `displayAuthor` per table, a
   reserved staff name), OpenAPI, `BACKEND_DESIGN.md`, `TEAMS.md`, `MODULE_API.md`. One PR.
   **Built 2026-10-29.** Beyond the list: the section is on the staff Account page
   (`AccountAdmin.jsx`) as well as the player one, since staff delete themselves too; the staff views
   (Reports queue, Teams forum log, moderation requests, leader overrides, the forum itself) mark a
   deleted account's stored name "(deleted account)"; a `transaction()` helper in `utils/db.js`. Walked
   locally against a throwaway database: refusals, deletion on the web and over a bearer with 2FA, the
   other device's session dying on its next request, staff names refused at admin create and at a
   rename, a player name free at once, the admin route, the last admin refused, and the web screens
   for a player and an admin. The forum's "[deleted player]" rendering and the demo lock are covered
   by tests only; the walk in step 6 sees them with a game module and the demo flag on.
3. **Module-Rust** (`edge`) and **Module-uo**: §4.4's hooks plus their core-ref pins, one PR
   each. Module-uo's PR adds `shard_pending_unlinks`, the retry, and the *still linked on the
   shard* list. **Integration Kit**: the re-pin and the paragraph, one PR.
   **Built 2026-10-30**, all three pinned to `7bd93b8` with `coreApi` `^1.20.0`:
   - **Module-Rust** (`edge`): `links.unlinkForDeletion`, as §4.4 says.
   - **Module-uo**: `utils/accountDeletion.js`. Beyond §4.4:
     - every account is queued *before* the first sidecar call, because one call can outlast the
       hook's 10 s;
     - the retry also runs on every live `server.hello` (the plugin reconnecting to a sidecar that
       stayed up);
     - a `pending` row clears on a live login without the `webId`, as a `refused` one does;
     - *still linked on the shard* is `pendingUnlinks` on `GET /admin/uo-link/config` and a section
       on Admin → Shard, so there is no new route.

     The table is in [`modules/uo/SCHEMA.md`](../modules/uo/SCHEMA.md).
   - **Integration Kit**: chapter 2 also gained the demo's two unlisted refusals (multipart and
     `data:` URIs), which it had never taught.
   - **Checked:** each repo's tests, and both modules' frozen-manifest job reproduced against
     `7bd93b8`.
   - **Not walked:** the live deletions are step 6.
4. **Android** (`edge`): §4.3. One PR.
   **Built 2026-10-30.** *Delete my account* is the last thing on *My account*, under a red rule,
   and opens its own screen with the website's words. Beyond §4.3:
   - **The refusals are read from the body.** The call reads the raw response, as the
     trusted-device cap does, so each `code` becomes its own sentence (the web's wording).
   - **The trust token goes too.** A sign-out keeps it for the next sign-in. A deleted account
     has no next sign-in, so the token is dropped.
   - **The notice** is the shell's snackbar, the one the demo's refusals use. The app opens
     sign-in with Home beneath it.
   - **Not touched:** the opt-in to push, which belongs to the phone, not the account. It
     survives, as it does a sign-out.

   Checked on the `s22_ultra` emulator against a local core at `7bd93b8`, with two throwaway
   players. A wrong password showed "Your password is incorrect." The server logged one 400
   and no replayed call, so AD12 holds in the app. Each player was deleted, one with an
   authenticator code. The app opened sign-in with the notice, and back led to a signed-out
   Home. The demo refusal and the no-password and last-admin refusals are covered by tests
   only; step 6 walks them.
5. **runicgateway.com**: §4.5, plus `PLAY_DATA_SAFETY.md` regenerated. One PR.
   **Built 2026-10-30.** The facts are the `deploy-account-deletion` row in `collection.mjs`, in the
   website's words, with how long each kept thing is kept, which Play asks and the screens don't
   say. The row also lists the delivery log's hashes and the suppression list, which §4.1's list
   has and the screens leave out. The app rows that a deletion touches say so, and the Data Safety
   notes answer "yes" and name the URL. Two answers from the org lead (runicgateway.com `PLAN.md`):
   - **D85:** the page is linked from the footer's legal bar, `/privacy` and `/app/`.
   - **D86:** someone who cannot sign in is told to try "Forgot your password?" first, then their
     community's operator. They are never pointed at us, and the page says we cannot do it.
6. **A walk**, using a throwaway account on each surface:
   - delete on the website, and in the app on the emulator
   - the other device's session dies on its next request
   - a Rust-linked account's grants leave the rig on the next sync, with a
     `rust.account.unlink` entry
   - a UO-linked account (the local ServUO with the uo-link sidecar): the shard's link is cleared,
     and the next login carries no `webId`. With the sidecar stopped, the unlink waits in
     `shard_pending_unlinks` and clears when the sidecar comes back
   - a forum post shows "[deleted player]" to a member and the old username, marked deleted, to
     staff
   - the deleted staff username is refused at registration and at a username change
   - the demo refuses
   - the last admin is refused

   **Walked 2026-10-30**, every row passing. Two local cores at website `7bd93b8`, one module
   each, on throwaway databases: Module-Rust `edge` `e30c7d5` linked to the Carbon rig (Rust
   26139947, Carbon 2.0.262, both the latest), and Module-uo `main` `148cf0f` with the local
   ServUO on servuo-plugins `main` and a uo-link sidecar built from link `main` (protocol 8). The
   app was the step 4 build on the `s22_ultra` emulator.
   - **Website, UO-linked.** A player linked to `seed_000` through the real `[link` code, with a
     second session open on a phone token, deleted the account from */account*. The site showed
     "Your account has been deleted.", and the phone token answered 401 on its next request.
     The shard's `WebsiteUserId` tag was gone, the log held `shard.account.unlink` with
     `reason: account deleted`, and Admin → Shard listed nothing still linked. A game login over
     a real socket before the deletion sent `mob.login` with `webId: "2"`. The same login after
     it sent no `webId`.
   - **Sidecar stopped.** A second linked player deleted their account while the sidecar was
     down. The deletion answered 200 at once, `seed_002` was queued as `pending` with the error
     `fetch failed`, and Admin → Shard listed it under *Still linked on the shard*. The shard
     still held the tag. When the sidecar started again, the ingest socket connected and the
     queued unlink finished within a second. The row cleared and the tag was gone.
   - **Forum.** The deleted player's two threads in their guild's Team forum read
     "[deleted player]" to a member, on the thread and on the post, in the API and on the guild
     page. Staff saw "uwplayer1 (deleted account)" there, with the moderation controls.
   - **App, Rust-linked.** A player linked to a stand-in Steam id held `autodoors.use`, granted
     from the site, and the app's *My Rust account* showed it as "Carbon rig · has it". They
     deleted the account in the app while a web session stayed open. The app opened sign-in,
     and the web cookie answered 401 on its next request. The log held `rust.account.unlink`.
     The next permission sync, 29 s later, pushed one revoke, and `c.show user` on the rig
     listed no permissions.
   - **Staff name.** A moderator deleted their own account. `RwMod` was then refused at
     registration ("That username is already taken.") and as rwmember's new username on
     */account*. An unused name registered.
   - **Demo.** With `DEMO_MODE=true`, `demo-player` saw "This is turned off on the demo site."
     on */account*, and an admin's `DELETE /admin/users/:id` on that account answered 403
     `DEMO_LOCKED`. An ordinary account on the same demo deleted itself.
   - **Last admin.** The UO site's only admin was refused on */admin/account*: "You are the only
     admin. Make someone else an admin before you delete your account."

   The walk used stand-ins in two places. The Steam link was written straight into
   `rust_account_links`, because the rig had no second player to type `/link`. The `[link`
   codes and the game logins came from a probe and a small socket client kept outside the repos.
   The deletion paths themselves were the real ones.

   **Found, then fixed (org lead, 2026-10-30):**
   - **W1 (Module-Rust).** `edge` held an empty file named `Promise.reject(dup)`, committed by
     step 3's PR (#70). It is a stray from a tool, not code. Removed in Module-Rust#71.
   - **W2 (Module-uo).** *Still linked on the shard* said "tried 1 time, and tried again when the
     bridge reconnects" about a retry that has not happened yet. It now says "It tries again
     when the bridge reconnects." Module-uo#48.
   - **W3 (Rust bridge, not deletion).** On Carbon, a group membership for a Steam id the server
     had never seen was reported as applied, but `c.show group` listed no users. The cause was
     worse than the symptom: Carbon writes such a grant or membership into one shared blank
     record, which every never-seen id then holds until a restart ([`rust/PLAN.md`
     §29.8](../modules/rust/PLAN.md)). The org lead chose to hold these until the player joins.
     Rust-Plugins#47 checks for a record on Carbon before writing, and reports `notLanded` or
     `pending` instead. It was proven on the rig before and after the change.
   - **Observed, unchanged:** `user.self_delete` names the id only, as §4.1 says, so the
     activity log alone cannot tell staff which account deleted itself. The auth slow-down
     covers the delete route, so a third call from one address took about 4 s.
7. Then `USER_SAFETY.md` (report, block and hide, now 1.21.0), then `android/PLAN.md` M8's
   cutover.