Commit Graph

26 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
d89ce06bb8 docs(builder): phase 8 — modules, architecture and reference
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m13s
Twenty pages completing the tree section 10 planned: Modules (8), Architecture
(5) and Reference (7). Four decisions, D38-D41, recorded in PLAN.md section 10.

D39 is the one that shaped the phase. Section 1 forbids re-specifying a
contract, and a Reference section is exactly where that rule is most tempting to
break, so the line is drawn at names: every environment variable, config key,
installer command, visibility rung and canonical document is listed with one
terse line saying what it is FOR, while shapes, semantics and every "why" stay
in the canonical document.

That is only safe because the names are checked. checkReference.mjs compares six
enumerations against the repositories that own them, over the Gitea API, as set
comparisons in BOTH directions -- and the second direction is the one that earns
its keep, because a reference page does not usually rot by describing something
that vanished, it rots by quietly not mentioning what was added since.

The check went green on its first run, which is the least trustworthy possible
outcome, so it was verified by breaking it: seven mutations, all caught. The one
worth keeping is the visibility ladder REORDERED with its membership unchanged
-- it is a security boundary, and a set comparison alone would have passed it.

D41 turns plannedSidebar from a checklist into a checked invariant, and finding
out why was the phase's first defect: it had already drifted, because phase 7
added the Content page under D37 and never updated the list. Nothing failed,
because nothing read it. checkSidebar.mjs now asserts the two trees agree on
groups, labels and order -- order because the order of Getting started IS the
installation path.

Two more things the writing found. PLAN.md's page count was wrong and had been
since section 10 was written ("roughly 38, 37 planned" for a tree of forty).
And module.json's `mounts` and the SPA's paths are different mechanisms that no
single document stated plainly -- module-uo declares admin: ["/shard",
"/uo-link"] while its screen lives at /admin/uo/link, because API routes are
deliberately NOT namespaced while SPA routes are. That is precisely the
distinction the installer got wrong in v0.1.0, and it now has a named home.

D40: the docs link to /architecture/'s drawn diagrams rather than importing
them. Those components carry marketing chrome and depend on diagram.css, which
Starlight does not load; the docs use text diagrams, which paste into an issue.

npm run verify green: 40 pages across 5 groups agree with plannedSidebar, 2390
internal links resolve, 123 repository links point at a branch, 19 facts, 59
quickstart checks, 22 reference enumerations, astro check 0 errors, 36 tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-24 12:17:31 -05:00
e8cb6061fe fix(facts): installer v0.1.1 is released, so the note names a version
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Successful in 9m22s
Recovering installer's orphan tag published v0.1.1, which moved the platform
under this branch and turned checkFacts red -- the check working exactly as it
should, since a version this site quotes had changed.

  FAIL  release installer
        platform.json says : v0.1.0
        installer releases/latest says : v0.1.1

The 500 that orphaned the tag was a race with the tag push one second earlier,
not a structural failure: re-running the workflow took the built-in orphan-tag
recovery path and published all four assets unchanged.

So the stale-path Aside stops saying "v0.1.0 is still the current download",
which is no longer true, and says the durable thing instead -- v0.1.0 prints
the old path, v0.1.1 prints the real one -- which stays correct however many
releases follow. platform.json and the PLAN.md version table move to v0.1.1,
and the phase 7 findings record the pipeline defect as a fourth finding.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-24 11:50:38 -05:00
a993b872ac fix(docs): clear the quickstart drift the upstream fixes caused
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
The three defects phase 7 found are fixed and merged: website#163
(SECRET_ENC_KEY missing from the root .env.example, plus BOT_INTERNAL_KEY in
the README's "set at least" list) and installer#22 + docs#174 (the handoff
printing /admin/shard).

website#163 turned checkQuickstart red here, which is precisely what the
declaration was built to do -- it fails the moment a declared key appears
upstream, so the note describing the omission cannot outlive the defect. The
SECRET_ENC_KEY entry is deleted and notInUpstreamEnvExample is now empty; the
export stays so the next divergence gets an entry rather than passing quietly.

The stale-path Aside on Connect a game server is pinned to v0.1.0 rather than
calling the installer permanently wrong, and now says WHY the old path is worse
than a 404: the SPA has no route for it, so it redirects to the dashboard and
the link looks like it worked.

v0.1.0 is still the current download, and not only because releases lag. The
release run for installer#22 built every artifact and pushed tag v0.1.1, then
took a 500 creating the release -- so the tag is orphaned and no binaries were
published. Raised on installer; nothing is worked around here.

This also recovers 084ee0b, which was pushed to feat/phase-7-docs after PR #10
had already merged f499f2b, and so never reached main.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-24 11:39:36 -05:00
bcb633403f Merge pull request 'docs(journey): phase 7 — the installation path and administration' (#10) from feat/phase-7-docs into main
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (push) Successful in 1m7s
Reviewed-on: #10
2026-08-24 15:24:18 +00:00
f499f2b72b docs(journey): phase 7 — the installation path and administration
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Successful in 9m25s
Twenty documentation pages: Getting started (7) and Administration (13), the
journey no existing document owns end to end because the repositories are
organised by component and an operator is not.

Four decisions of record, taken before anything was written (D34–D37, PLAN.md
§10 "How phase 7 built the documentation journey"):

- D34 one PR for all twenty pages.
- D35 the install page is SELF-CONTAINED: it prints a complete Compose file and
  a complete .env that an operator copies without visiting another repository.
  That is a copy of somebody else's file, so it is checked rather than trusted —
  scripts/checkQuickstart.mjs re-reads website main:docker-compose.yml and
  main:.env.example over the Gitea API and fails on any disagreement, in both
  directions: a value that drifts fails, and a service or variable that appears
  upstream fails until it is either included or recorded as deliberately omitted
  with a reason. Its first run found two stale entries.
- D36 every Administration screen was walked on a real deployment before it was
  described — the rig being the quickstart itself, against the published image,
  so one run proved the install page and produced the detail the admin pages
  needed.
- D37 a thirteenth Administration page, Content, so that every admin nav row has
  a home without organising the docs by the app's menu.

What the live deployment disproved, all three now documented:

- The documented Compose deploy does not boot. SECRET_ENC_KEY is required in
  production (utils/secretBox.js throws at require time) and is missing from
  website's ROOT .env.example — the file Compose reads. It is present in
  server/.env.example, which is why dev never hits it. The quickstart carries it,
  declared as an upstream omission so the check fails the day it is fixed.
- The installer points operators at a screen that no longer exists: it prints
  <site>/admin/shard, and INSTALL.md §5 repeats it, but since the module cutover
  the screen is /admin/uo/link. Both the binary and the guide are stale.
- The admin Restart button opens a window.confirm whose text is the honest
  warning that a deployment with no supervisor does not come back — which is why
  `restart: unless-stopped` is called out as load-bearing rather than left as
  boilerplate.

And the defect only a look found, three phases running: the .env block's prose
promised that every highlighted line must be changed, while `mark` given the
variable names highlighted the names alone and left the values unmarked. Every
check passed on a page that was wrong about its own highlighting.

verify green: 890 internal links, 52 branch links, 19 facts, 59 quickstart
checks, 0 astro-check errors.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-24 08:35:03 -05:00
971fa9c032 Merge pull request 'feat(legal): phase 6 — the privacy policy and the terms' (#9) from feat/phase-6-legal into main
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (push) Successful in 9m12s
Reviewed-on: #9
2026-08-24 09:28:39 +00:00
a2faf07104 feat(legal): phase 6 — the privacy policy and the terms
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Successful in 55s
PLAN.md §9. Builds /privacy and /terms, links them from the footer on every page,
and generates the Play Data Safety notes from the same inventory the policy renders.

Four decisions taken by the org lead before either page was written, recorded in
§9 under "How phase 6 built the legal pages":

  D30  DNS-only records, so the reverse proxy on the host keeps the only access
       log. Described qualitatively — the retention belongs to the proxy, and a
       policy that quotes a number the deployment does not enforce is worse than
       one that does not.
  D31  Eighteen or older. Above the children's-consent threshold everywhere in the
       EEA, so consent works with no parental-consent machinery this form could not
       honestly operate. Four surfaces render it from src/data/legal.mjs, and every
       one says plainly that nothing verifies it.
  D32  No governing-law clause. Nothing of value is contracted for here.
  D33  PLAY_DATA_SAFETY.md is generated from src/data/collection.mjs and checked in
       CI, so the published policy and the answers given to Google cannot drift.

/privacy is three separately-scoped sections because "we" means three different
parties: this site (one form, no cookies, no third-party requests), the Android app
(we operate no server it talks to — the rows are what the DEVICE holds), and a
self-hosted deployment (the operator is the controller, not us). Every row names the
file it was read out of, because a policy is the document most likely to be written
from a template and least likely to be re-read against the software.

/terms governs only what we run: this site, the beta list, and the APK we publish.
The software is governed by its licence, and a community's deployment by that
community — a terms page claiming authority over every install of a GPL program is
the thing a generated template gets wrong.

Also here:
  - the age clause changed CONSENT_TEXT, so CONSENT_VERSION gained a suffix; rows
    written from now on carry the new sentence and older rows keep theirs
  - PLANNED_ROUTES is now empty — these were its last two entries, and its reverse
    check is what forced the deletion; the list stays for phases 7 and 8
  - test/legal.test.mjs asserts the structural promises no build check can see,
    including that every mapped Play row still answers "not collected, not shared"
  - --check normalises line endings: the repo has no .gitattributes and Windows
    checkouts are CRLF, so a byte comparison would fail for every Windows developer
    while passing in CI

Verified: npm run verify green end to end (tokens, brand, data safety, astro check,
36 tests, build, 214 links, 19 facts), both pages walked in a browser, and neither
overflows at 390px. One defect the checks could not see and a look could: the
retention line was being pushed to the foot of the tallest card in its row, opening
a void in the middle of the short ones.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-24 04:21:47 -05:00
29c96d0b21 Merge pull request 'feat(beta): phase 5 — the app page and the closed-beta signup' (#8) from feat/phase-5-beta into main
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (push) Successful in 54s
Reviewed-on: #8
2026-08-24 08:55:01 +00:00
1313e748ae feat(beta): phase 5 — the app page and the closed-beta signup
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
Builds `/app/` and `/beta/`, the SQLite signup store, the rate limiting and the
export CLI of PLAN.md §8, and adds this repository's first test suite.

Four decisions of record, D26–D29 (§8, "How phase 5 built the app and the beta"):

- D26 — the screenshot slot ships empty, reserved for phase 9. §10 promised
  `/app/` "the 14 existing screenshots"; they are a July trusted-device smoke
  test against an unseeded dev instance, captured before the theming work, and
  five of the fourteen are two-factor prompts. Shipping them would break D4.
  Phase 9 already builds the rig, so it gains an emulator pass.
- D27 — the public demo is the tester target. `ConnectScreen.kt` gates the whole
  app on a validated deployment address, so a tester needs somewhere to point it.
  The beta therefore waits on the demo VM, and the page says so.
- D28 — `/beta` handles its own POST; there is no `/api/beta-signup`. An endpoint
  cannot report a validation error without JavaScript. §6's diagram is amended.
- D29 — the APK and the beta get equal billing, and the APK link is off:
  `androidApk.serviceable` is false because the published v0.5.0 build does not
  work. The panel stays and states that plainly rather than being removed.

Three mechanisms the plan did not anticipate:

- `liveBrand()` — a server-rendered page never passes through the boot rewrite,
  so `/beta` reads the mounted brand.json itself. Pasting the Play opt-in URL in
  takes effect on the next request rather than the next restart.
- `checkLinks.mjs` derives on-demand routes from `prerender = false` in the
  source. A PLANNED_ROUTES entry would have been wrong: its reverse check fires
  when a route has been built, and an on-demand route never produces a file, so
  the entry could never rot out.
- `npm test` — the five existing checks all read built output, and none of this
  logic appears there. A honeypot can stop working and leave the build identical.

Also: `checkFacts.mjs` gains the APK assets and `minSdk`, and learns that RFC 2606
reserved domains are not contact addresses; the D13 rule is otherwise unchanged.

Verified end to end against the built server: every outcome renders with no
JavaScript, cross-origin POSTs are refused, a mounted opt-in URL appears without
a restart, and the export CLI round-trips.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-24 03:50:51 -05:00
fbd7bbe6fd Merge pull request 'feat(marketing): phase 4 — the marketing pages' (#7) from feat/phase-4-marketing into main
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (push) Successful in 9m3s
Reviewed-on: #7
2026-08-24 07:53:00 +00:00
2d19ee4220 feat(marketing): phase 4 — the marketing pages
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Successful in 9m9s
PLAN.md §13 phase 4: /features/, /architecture/, /modules/, /integrations/, and
/community/ — plus the two scope items the phase table never assigned to anyone.

Six decisions taken by the org lead before coding, recorded in PLAN.md §10 as
D20-D25:

- D20 /features/ is the homepage's list with a `detail` line, not a second list.
  One data file, two renderings, so they cannot disagree about what exists.
- D21 /architecture/ draws reasons, not reference: three new inline SVGs, one per
  boundary. No endpoint tables, no config keys — those are phase 8's and stay
  canonical in docs/.
- D22 The deliberate absences of §2 become one tagged data file, rendered on the
  three pages that promise them.
- D23 Phase 4 absorbs /community/ (specified in §10 and §14 N3, linked from the
  header since phase 1, built by no phase) and checkLinks.mjs.
- D24 `needsModule`: writing the Teams detail exposed a false claim phase 3
  shipped. Teams are module-sourced only — teams.module_id is NOT NULL, there is
  no create route, sync is gated on providerModuleId() — so the Community group
  no longer says a bare core does all of it.
- D25 The per-capability demo affordance brand.json had promised since phase 2 is
  a deep link, filled at boot from data-demo-path.

checkLinks.mjs reads the built HTML rather than src/, because half these links
are assembled from data files and template literals. Its PLANNED_ROUTES list is
checked in both directions, so it cannot rot into a permanent exemption.

applyBrand.mjs gained a pass that recomputes deep links from their immutable
path, making it idempotent and reversible; checkBrand.mjs lifts that pattern out
and runs it against the stock markup so the two cannot drift. Both proved
against a real mount, in both directions.

Fixes a cascade bug the checks could not see: [data-demo-url=''] and a scoped
component class are both specificity 0,1,0, so .demo-link's `display` beat the
hide rule and twelve links to a nonexistent demo rendered, each resolving to the
current page. The rule is now !important.

The four diagrams' shared SVG vocabulary moved to src/styles/diagram.css.

Verified from a clean checkout: npm ci, all five checks, astro check (0 errors),
production build, and a live browser pass at desktop and 390px.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-24 01:53:11 -05:00
d9d7a8d47f Merge pull request 'feat(home): phase 3 — the homepage' (#6) from feat/phase-3-homepage into main
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (push) Successful in 9m10s
Reviewed-on: #6
2026-08-20 05:14:00 +00:00
556dee7355 feat(home): phase 3 — the homepage
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Successful in 49s
Replaces phase 1's scaffold with the real homepage: hero, the data path as
inline SVG, the self-hosted argument, all five capability groups, and the
get-started CTA. Three decisions the org lead took first are recorded in
PLAN.md as D17-D19.

The data path is drawn generically and captioned specifically (D17): the nodes
say "your game server" and "sidecar", the sub-labels and caption name ServUO and
uo-link. The SVG is aria-hidden because the four numbered steps beside it carry
the same path in prose — one telling, not two.

The capability list is data with a check behind it (D18). Every Game-intelligence
item names the module-uo capability slug it comes from, and the build fails if
the page and platform.json disagree either way. That needed a fifteenth fact in
checkFacts.mjs: §12 named the capability list as an externally-sourced fact and
nothing re-read it, so the chain rested on someone remembering. It also found
that the site was omitting two of the module's eight capabilities — guilds and
city governors are now listed, in the page and in §10.

The hero leads with the emblem (D19), derived from whichever logo.png is in
force so one file still changes the hero, header, tab icon and app icon
together.

Also here, both found by standing the build up rather than by review:

  - checkBrand.mjs now enforces the demo slot's markup contract. applyBrand.mjs
    reveals the demo link by replacing an exact pair of empty attributes; an
    attribute inserted between them produces a build where the mount sets a demo
    URL, the boot log says nothing and the link never appears. Both halves are
    checked and the literal is derived from the expression applyBrand.mjs uses,
    so they cannot drift.

  - The header nav overflowed at 390px — four links plus the lockup measured
    433px against a 390px viewport, so every phone got a horizontally scrolling
    page. Phase 1 left this to phase 3 expecting a disclosure control; it got a
    wrap instead, because with four links there is nothing to disclose and a
    hamburger costs state, script and duplicate markup.

Verified on a clean checkout of this commit: all four checks, astro check, a
production build, a live /brand/* smoke, and a demo URL mounted and reverted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-20 00:03:04 -05:00
bb06f1de44 Merge pull request 'feat(brand): phase 2 — the branding pipeline' (#5) from feat/phase-2-branding into main
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (push) Successful in 56s
Reviewed-on: #5
Reviewed-by: Colby Whitlock <whitlocktech@gmail.com>
2026-08-20 04:36:03 +00:00
fe4abe0ebf feat(brand): phase 2 — the branding pipeline
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Successful in 9m9s
PLAN.md §7: swapping a logo or recolouring the site is a file copy and a
container restart, never a rebuild. Phase 2 builds the mechanism and the
checks that keep it true.

GET /brand/* resolves every file against the mount first and the baked-in
defaults second, per file, at stable unhashed URLs with an ETag and a five
minute TTL. Nothing goes through Vite, which would fingerprint the names out
of the mount's reach. An X-Brand-Source header says which step answered.

Three decisions were taken with the org lead (recorded as D14-D16 in §7):

D14 — one raster in, every size out. brand-default holds a single logo.png;
the header mark at three pixel ratios, both install icons, the apple-touch
icon, the favicons and a real multi-resolution favicon.ico are derived on
request from whichever logo.png is in force, cached, and limited to an
allowlist of sizes. Shipping fifteen precomputed files would have meant an
operator producing fifteen to change a mark — and getting a new header with
the old favicon.

D15 — brand text is applied at boot. Pages are prerendered, so §7's promise
about the site name, tagline and links could not hold at render time.
npm start now runs scripts/applyBrand.mjs first, rewriting the built HTML
from what it last applied to what the mount says. It rewrites from a record
in dist/.brand-applied.json rather than from the defaults, because the naive
version works exactly once and then silently ignores every later edit. An
empty mount is a no-op; removing a mount restores the stock build byte for
byte. Verified both ways, plus a second rename.

D16 — the header shows the real emblem, replacing phase 1's placeholder
glyph, so the site, the product and the Android launcher icon are one mark.
It is raster art, so theme.css cannot recolour it; replacing logo.png is how
the mark changes.

Two defects found and fixed while proving it:

The mounted theme.css did not win. Astro emits its own stylesheet after the
head markup, so linking the operator's last was not enough and every override
was silently a no-op. tokens.css now lives in @layer tokens and the mounted
file is unlayered, which takes order out of the mechanism entirely.

The documentation was a different site. Starlight builds its own head, so the
docs linked a Starlight default /favicon.svg that does not exist here, carried
no manifest or OG card, and never loaded the brand stylesheet — a mounted
theme recoloured the marketing pages and left the docs stock. A Head override
fixes it; half a rebrand looks like a product bug rather than a missed step.

brand-default/wordmark.svg and og-image.png are generated by
scripts/buildBrandAssets.mjs from the emblem and Cinzel's outlines and are
committed, so CI needs neither the artwork nor a font. Type is converted to
paths, because an SVG in an <img> can see neither the page's @font-face rules
nor fontconfig — the same isolation that broke currentColor in phase 1. Its
glyphs are drawn at the origin and translated: opentype.js emits NaN
coordinates at a non-zero origin for some glyphs, and a path parser stops at
the first malformed command, so the first lockup read "Runic Gate" and looked
like a typo rather than a bug.

scripts/checkBrand.mjs is the mechanism for the two failures that are
otherwise silent: it puts every literal /brand/... URL in the source through
the route's own classifier, so a size that is not on the allowlist fails the
build instead of 404ing in a browser, and it rejects a brand string short
enough that a blind replacement at boot could corrupt a page. Negative-tested
three ways before being trusted. It runs in CI ahead of the type check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 23:14:17 -05:00
dae7964ca6 Merge pull request 'feat(site): phase 1 — the foundation' (#4) from feat/phase-1-foundation into main
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (push) Successful in 9m12s
Reviewed-on: #4
2026-08-20 02:06:24 +00:00
b287728c19 ci(facts): use the existing org-level REGISTRY_TOKEN
All checks were successful
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Successful in 9m11s
checkFacts needs to read link, servuo-plugins, website and installer, and
the automatic per-run token is scoped to this repo alone. Rather than mint
a new secret, the workflow uses REGISTRY_TOKEN, which already exists at the
org level with the right permissions.

The secret is named for the registry and the script reads GITEA_TOKEN; the
mapping stays in the workflow so the script keeps asking for what it
actually wants -- a Gitea token -- rather than this org's secret name.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 20:46:18 -05:00
d4ab453361 fix(site): anchor the bind-mount ignores, and commit platform.json
Some checks failed
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Failing after 1m1s
`data/` without a leading slash matches a directory of that name at any
depth, so it silently swallowed src/data/platform.json -- the single file
every page and checkFacts.mjs reads.

The working tree still had it, so `npm run verify` passed locally with all
14 facts green. CI cloned fresh and `astro check` failed on the missing
module. Anchored both patterns to the repository root.

Verified the way it should have been the first time: exported HEAD to a
clean directory, npm ci, and ran the checks there rather than in the tree
that was hiding the problem.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 20:38:07 -05:00
543389e95a Merge pull request 'docs(plan): D13 settles the contact address, and Phase 0 is done' (#3) from docs/contact-address-decision into main
Reviewed-on: #3
2026-08-20 01:36:09 +00:00
66187dde5d feat(site): phase 1 — the foundation
Some checks failed
PR checks / checks (pull_request) Failing after 4m19s
Astro 7 with the Node adapter, Starlight mounted at /docs, the token file, both
self-hosted typefaces, the layout shell, and the two build-time checks from §12.

The palette's gold and cyan are sampled from runic-emblem.png rather than
guessed, per §11: 494,059 opaque pixels binned by hue, each value annotated with
its measured contrast against the ground, and restricted rather than brightened
where a ratio fails.

- checkTokens.mjs fails the build on any colour literal outside tokens.css,
  which is what keeps §7's "recolouring is a file copy" promise true.
- checkFacts.mjs re-reads all 14 externally-sourced facts from their authorities
  over the Gitea API and fails on disagreement. It also enforces D13: no email
  address in the source outside brand-default/brand.json.
- Both were negative-tested; neither has ever been allowed to pass by default.

§6 asks for output:'server' with per-page prerender=true. Astro 7 expresses the
same runtime shape as output:'static' with an adapter, opting individual routes
out — so the default is static rather than accidentally server-rendered.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 19:08:52 -05:00
5f09b66742 docs(plan): D13 settles the contact address, and Phase 0 is done
The domain still has no mailbox. Rather than delay the beta on Cloudflare
Email Routing, the org lead elected to publish the existing address.

- D13 recorded: whitlocktech@gmail.com is the published contact, held only
  in brand.json so a later privacy@/security@ is a file copy, not a rebuild.
- Phase 0 PR 0.10 withdrawn -- SECURITY.md already carries that address.
- checkFacts.mjs gains the rule that keeps the promise true: no email
  address in the source outside brand-default/brand.json.
- Phase 0 marked complete (docs#172, docs#173, .profile#4, Module-uo#19).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 18:39:40 -05:00
650ea21ad4 Merge pull request 'docs(plan): record the org lead's decisions and design against them' (#2) from docs/plan-decisions into main
Reviewed-on: #2
2026-08-19 23:26:23 +00:00
fce3444c6c docs(plan): record the org lead's decisions and design against them
Revision 1 ended in five open questions. All are now answered, plus the
domain and Gitea-registration facts, so the plan states decisions instead
of asking.

New section 5 holds the twelve decisions of record. Sections 6-9 design
against them: the Astro + Node adapter runtime, branding resolved out of a
bind mount against baked defaults, the Android closed-beta signup, and the
legal pages the beta cannot ship without.

Re-verified every version against the Gitea API and corrected three things
revision 1 got wrong: the bundle manifests live at the root of the bundles
branch rather than under bundles/, the website publishes no releases at
all, and the Android app targets no server of ours - the user enters the
address, which is load-bearing for the privacy policy.

Phase 0 grows from the four operator-facing documentation fixes to all
ten conflicts, plus retiring the personal Gmail that SECURITY.md
publishes as the public vulnerability contact.

Two design notes worth flagging. Play does not notify testers on the
email-list path either, so a site that sends no mail looked blocked - but
the closed-testing opt-in URL only works for addresses already on the
list, so it is safe to publish on the confirmation screen, with Discord
carrying the announcement. And the CSV export is a CLI against the bind
mount rather than an admin page, so the site keeps no authenticated
surface at all.

The demo instance is recorded as planned and out of scope: a Proxmox VM
running the full stack including ServUO, restricted and reset hourly. The
site reserves its slot now so it costs one line in a bind-mounted file
later.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 17:54:42 -05:00
71ce9d2eb1 Merge pull request 'docs(plan): the design of record for runicgateway.com' (#1) from docs/site-plan into main
Reviewed-on: #1
2026-08-19 20:09:06 +00:00
96f77a87e1 docs(plan): the design of record for runicgateway.com
Reconnaissance across the nine RunicGateway checkouts, and the plan for the
public site + documentation experience built on top of them.

The site is a presentation layer over existing project knowledge: normative
contracts stay canonical in docs/ and are linked, never copied. What the site
authors is the journey — install, configure, administer, extend — which no
existing document owns end to end, because the repos are organised by
component and an operator is not.

Two things worth reading before the rest:

- Section 3 lists eleven places the repositories contradict each other,
  verified against origin/main rather than resolved quietly. The sharpest is
  that link/INTEGRATION.md documents the protocol-4 event kinds while its
  normative section 2 still declares X-UOLink-Version: 3 — one document
  disagreeing with itself. installer/INSTALL.md still hands operators
  "Protocol version 3", which is the value they paste into Admin -> Shard,
  and its own troubleshooting table says a stale number looks exactly like
  the shard going offline.

- Section 4 makes fixing those a Phase 0 that lands before the site quotes
  anything: four PRs across docs and .profile, none of which touch code or a
  contract. They correct documentation to match what main already does.

Section 1 also records a process failure and the rule taken from it. An
earlier draft claimed the platform was on protocol 3 with 4 "not cut over".
Every checkout was on a feature branch whose local main ref had never been
fetched, so git show main:<path> answered from a months-old blob. Every fact
in section 2 is now read from origin/main or the Gitea API, and section 7
turns that into a build-time check instead of a promise.

Section 9 leaves five questions open rather than assuming answers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 15:07:30 -05:00
f79c938e12 Initial commit 2026-08-19 19:55:15 +00:00