Files
website/client/src/components/SiteFooter.jsx
wtclaude d667565ae7
All checks were successful
PR Checks / client-build (pull_request) Successful in 26s
PR Checks / server-tests (pull_request) Successful in 29s
PR Checks / bot-install (pull_request) Successful in 8m46s
refactor(modules): move core's UO page content behind the two slots
Core declares site.footer.status and admin.users.detail in main.jsx and fills
both itself, under owner id `core` -- the client twin of registries.registerCore()
and the same trick useShardFlags already uses. The rendered page is unchanged;
what changes is that the content now arrives the way a module's will.

The footer's Shard Status link becomes ShardStatusLink.jsx, and UserDetail's six
UO sections become UserShardSections.jsx. Both are files rather than inline
markup so that the client half of phase 3 deletes a registration and a file
instead of editing a core page under extraction pressure -- which is also what
proves the mechanism before anything depends on it.

The user-detail slot is handed userId and not scope. api.admin.userShard is a UO
binding that leaves core with the client half, so a slot passing it would hand a
module something core is about to delete; an extension builds its own client for
the routes it registered at the other end. Core's own fill now does exactly what
the module will.

Verified in a browser against a real chunk (MODULE_API.md 7.7): a throwaway
module fills both slots and renders its own label and target in the footer with
core's linkStyle, and receives userId on the admin page; a deliberate render
failure is contained to that one spot with the slot named in the console; core's
own fills leave the pages byte-identical to before; and with no module installed
both slots render nothing. Zero CSP reports throughout.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 16:45:22 -05:00

66 lines
2.5 KiB
JavaScript

import { Link } from 'react-router-dom'
import { useSite } from '../contexts/SiteContext.jsx'
import Slot from '../modules/Slot.jsx'
const FOOTER_SLOT = 'site.footer.status'
// Handed to the extension rather than left for it to guess. A module rendering
// its own link in this row should look like the row, and the alternative is
// every module restating core's colours and then drifting from them the next
// time this footer is themed.
const LINK_STYLE = { color: 'var(--accent)', textDecoration: 'none' }
export default function SiteFooter() {
const { contactEmail, siteTitle } = useSite()
return (
<footer
className="sans site-footer"
style={{
borderTop: '1px solid var(--line)',
padding: '28px 16px',
color: 'var(--muted)',
fontSize: '0.9rem',
background: 'rgba(9,13,18,0.6)',
}}
>
<div className="site-footer-inner">
<div className="site-footer-badge">
<img src="/assets/img/runic-emblem.png" alt="" aria-hidden="true" />
<span>
Powered by
<br />
<a
href="https://gitea.whitlocktech.com/RunicGateway"
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"
className="site-footer-brand-link"
>
<strong>Runic Gateway</strong>
</a>
</span>
</div>
<div className="site-footer-info">
<span>{siteTitle} is an independent private shard project.</span>
<span style={{ color: 'var(--dim)', fontSize: '0.84rem' }}>
<a href={`mailto:${contactEmail}`} style={{ color: 'var(--accent)', textDecoration: 'none' }}>
{contactEmail}
</a>
{/* A module's spot in the footer, and core supplies only the
position and the styling: the label, the target and whether
anything renders at all are the module's (MODULE_API.md §3.7).
The separator goes through `wrap` rather than sitting beside the
slot, so it shares the extension's fate — no module installed and
a module whose link throws both render nothing here, rather than
the second leaving a stray middot behind. */}
<Slot name={FOOTER_SLOT} linkStyle={LINK_STYLE} wrap={(link) => <>&nbsp;·&nbsp;{link}</>} />
&nbsp;·&nbsp;
<Link to="/admin/login" style={{ color: '#5d6b7d', textDecoration: 'none' }}>
Admin
</Link>
</span>
</div>
</div>
</footer>
)
}