Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
9018e55488 Merge pull request 'feat(ci): packaging, release and the frozen manifest' (#2) from feat/phase-2-packaging into main
All checks were successful
Release / release (push) Successful in 21s
Reviewed-on: #2
v0.1.0
2026-09-16 10:34:58 +00:00
b33d21d71b feat(ci): packaging, release and the frozen manifest
All checks were successful
PR Checks / server-tests (pull_request) Successful in 21s
PR Checks / client-build (pull_request) Successful in 21s
PR Checks / frozen-manifest (pull_request) Successful in 39s
Phase 2 of docs/modules/rust/PLAN.md. Phase 1 built five guards and ran them by
hand; this repo had no workflows at all, so nothing gated the branch that gets
released and there was no way to release it.

Three pieces:

- **release.yml** — the derived-version engine link, installer and Module-uo
  already run (conventional-commit subjects since the newest tag; module.json's
  version survives as a floor; workflow_dispatch as the backdoor), assembling the
  bundle from an include list and publishing the tarball, the install manifest
  carrying its sha256, and SHA256SUMS. The tag is the number that ships and CI
  stamps it into the bundle's own module.json.
- **pr-checks.yml** — server tests, check:imports, check:bundle, check:swagger,
  the client build, client tests and check:externals, plus frozen-manifest.
- **frozen-manifest** — clones core at the sha pinned in ci/core-ref.json,
  generates its route table without this module and with it, and takes the
  difference. It ran locally against that exact ref: six routes, all documented,
  no core route moved. That is the first proof by a running core that /rust
  collides with nothing — phase 1 could only check it by reading, because core
  mounts /status and /version at a tier root where the loader's own collision
  probe cannot see them.

The bundle carries no node_modules, because the shipped half declares no runtime
dependencies (org lead, phase 2). checkBundle.js holds both halves of that: the
include list still covers everything server/index.js reaches, and no dependency
has appeared without the release learning to pack it. Verified by breaking it —
dropping "model" from the list names the exact edit and exits 1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016wDDVXWMDz82WqE1i969r4
2026-09-16 02:10:07 -05:00
986f460b6e Merge pull request 'feat: the module skeleton and every bundle seam' (#1) from feat/phase-1-skeleton into main
Reviewed-on: #1
2026-09-16 01:30:19 +00:00
862c328176 feat: the module skeleton and every bundle seam
module-rust, id 'rust', built from the Integration Kit's template. Phase 1's job
is the kit's own argument: get every seam working at once with almost nothing in
them, so that afterwards you break exactly one at a time.

What is here:

* /rust on all three tiers, because the loader holds module.json's mounts against
  what is registered in BOTH directions -- so the declaration and the
  registration land together or not at all. The player tier is honestly thin: it
  answers the server list on the authenticated tier, delegating to the same model
  the public tier uses so the two cannot drift while they are meant to be the
  same. It is the address the app will call, registered now rather than moved
  later.
* Two tables. rust_servers is configuration an operator writes; rust_server_state
  is what a sidecar reported. Separate tables because they have different
  writers, lifetimes and audiences -- and because purging observed state while
  keeping the configuration is a thing an operator will want.
* Per-server sidecar tokens through ctx.secretBox, write-only in the API. The
  admin list reports hasToken and never the credential, and an empty token on a
  save leaves the stored one alone -- a form that posts its own blank field would
  otherwise erase a credential every time somebody renamed a server.
* A real sidecar client. It never throws: every call answers {ok, status, data},
  and the status is what tells a wrong URL from a wrong token from a mismatched
  protocol -- all three present as 'the site says my server is offline' and each
  has a different fix.
* The five guards, green: check:imports, check:swagger, check:externals, and both
  suites.

What is deliberately NOT registered: the Team provider, triggers, audiences,
engagement seeds, notification streams, the four event catalogues, and the two
extension slots. Each arrives with the phase that has something real to put in
it, and a test asserts their absence so that removing it is deliberate. A
declared trigger nothing emits and a declared slot nothing fills are both
surfaces an operator can configure and then wait on, which is worse than an
absent one because the absence is visible.

Two corrections to the kit's template, both feedback for a later phase:

* registration.test.js read one page BY NAME to check declared slots are
  rendered, so a module declaring none dies on ENOENT before reaching the loop
  that would have been empty. It now scans every file under src/routes.
* test/_fakes.js supplied validator: {}. An admin router that builds validation
  chains at file scope cannot be required with that, so the fake holds the real
  express-validator -- for the same reason it holds a real express Router.

The kit was right about noGameConnection.test.js: its header predicts that a
module adding a sidecar client will see the check go red, names sidecarClient.js
as the file to allow, and says narrow it rather than delete it. That is exactly
what happened on the first run, and the fix was the one line the header names.

Installed into a real core and verified: the module reaches 'started', publishes
its capability, serves its chunk, and renders a server whose server.hello
originated in a live Rust server.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016wDDVXWMDz82WqE1i969r4
2026-09-15 19:54:08 -05:00
883438009d chore: repository scaffolding
The org's standard furniture for a new repo: licence, code of conduct, security
policy, contributing guide, issue and pull-request templates, and the ignore
rules. No module yet — that arrives as the first pull request, so this branch
exists to open one against.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016wDDVXWMDz82WqE1i969r4
2026-09-15 19:53:44 -05:00