Commit Graph

534 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
6601e410f4 Merge pull request 'docs(engagement): the two walk defects, fixed — and what digest is' (#204) from docs/engagement-walk-fixes into main
Reviewed-on: #204
2026-09-01 19:33:58 +00:00
b3dd2c7cbb docs(engagement): the two walk defects, fixed -- and what digest is
Follows docs#203, which recorded the two defects Phase 13's acceptance walk found
and left them for placing. They are fixed in website#181, so Phase 13's as-built
says so and says what the fix was rather than leaving a reader to find the PR.

Two other files were describing a contract the code did not honour, which is why
the second defect could exist at all:

  * BACKEND_DESIGN's `template_keys` column row said only that keys are
    shape-checked. It now says the one thing that was actually load-bearing --
    `digest` is a key that is NOT a channel, because it names a MODE's body --
    and that the rules validator rejected it until website#181, which made every
    rule shipping one unsaveable from the Rules screen, core's own included.
  * MODULE_API 2.4 already told modules they may point `template_keys` at
    `notify.digest` and never said what `digest` was. A module author reading it
    would reasonably have expected it to be a channel. One bullet, next to the
    generic-bodies one that sends them there.

No contract changed; the docs were right and the code was wrong. No
MODULE_API_VERSION bump for the same reason.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 14:31:00 -05:00
924204f8ba Merge pull request 'docs(engagement): Phase 13 as built, and Phase 14 — retention' (#203) from docs/engagement-phase-13-as-built into main
Reviewed-on: #203
2026-09-01 18:55:12 +00:00
cff73ad863 docs(engagement): the Phase 13 acceptance walk, and the two defects it found
The walk ran and PASSED. Released artefacts only: the released installer,
checksum-verified, resolving bundle 2026.09.01; the overlay compiled against
stock ServUO 57.4 with zero errors; a fresh `main` clone of website with
module-uo v1.1.0 installed from its release manifest rather than copied in.
Forcing a house to Greatly produced exactly one email and one in-app item to the
linked owner and nothing to anyone else -- every row in every delivery table
names that one user.

Two defects, both in shipped core, neither visible to any test:

  * `seedRuleGroup()` reads its settings stamp, inserts the whole group, and
    writes the stamp AFTER the loop. Two processes booting in the same moment
    both read "not seeded" and both insert -- 52 UO rules where the module ships
    26, under one stamp. The function's own comment names the cost: a duplicate
    rule is two mails per event. A `--scale app=2` or a rolling restart does this
    on purpose.
  * `checkSeedRule` permits a `digest` template key in as many words, and
    sixteen in-universe UO rules ship one; `engagementRules.model.js` then
    rejects any templateKeys entry that is not one of the rule's channels. So an
    operator who opens "House - decay warning" and presses Save gets a 400
    naming a key they never typed, and the only way to save is to delete the
    digest body.

Neither is fixed here -- this PR documents a cutover, and a core change belongs
in its own.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 13:47:46 -05:00
5f5ca41d9e docs(engagement): Phase 13 as built, and Phase 14 -- retention
Phase 13 was the only phase in the workstream with no as-built section, which
6.0b makes a phase's own deliverable. It has one now, and it has something to
record beyond "it merged":

  * the window missed steps 5 and 7 (Integration-kit, runicgateway.com); they
    landed afterwards, with a third PR clearing a leftover from step 4;
  * Gitea's `raw` API route is CDN-cached for six hours, and a stale read fails
    BOTH ways -- it failed a correct site AND reported an already-republished
    bundle as current. All three cross-repo checks read `contents` now;
  * the Integration-kit equality check never goes red on its own. It clones the
    ref the kit itself pins, so the kit sat three minor versions behind, green,
    for the whole workstream. Step 5 is the only thing that makes anyone look;
  * `registerEngagementSeeds` does not validate the body it seeds, and the kit's
    own example was malformed. Only a run through core's REAL registry found it,
    which the kit's CI does not do and cannot;
  * every `edge` was deleted rather than fast-forwarded. Recorded as the
    convention, because a branch that does not exist cannot be branched from
    stale -- which was 6.0a's actual failure.

Phase 12's second finding becomes **Phase 14**, scoped and not started: four
tables with no retention sweep, and they are not one problem with one horizon.
`engagementCooldowns.db.prune()` already exists with no caller; the send log has
two live readers (the hourly cap's index and the operator screen) that bound how
short its horizon may be; and suppressions probably should NOT expire at all,
because ageing out a bounce re-mails an address that already hard-bounced. The
phase owes `/privacy` and the Play answers, which today say "nothing here expires
on its own" -- true now, false the moment it lands.

Also: ticks on the phase headings that were done and unmarked (4, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13), a status header that still said everything from Phase 10 on was design, and
three status lines that outlived the cutover -- `link/v5.md` and this README's
index row both said protocol 5 was built but unreleased, and INTEGRATION.md named
the v2.0.0/v1.0.0 pairing as the shipped one.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 13:17:08 -05:00
bc74a507b3 Merge pull request 'docs(tree): sync android/PROJECT_TREE.md' (#202) from chore/sync-android-tree into main
Reviewed-on: #202
2026-09-01 17:45:00 +00:00
runic-docs-bot
ab6518c783 docs(tree): sync android/PROJECT_TREE.md from RunicGateway/Android-app@80441c3 [skip ci] 2026-09-01 14:02:19 +00:00
c13e8b2fdb Merge pull request 'docs(tree): sync website/PROJECT_TREE.md' (#201) from chore/sync-website-tree into main
Reviewed-on: #201
2026-09-01 14:00:20 +00:00
runic-docs-bot
4f164449e4 docs(tree): sync website/PROJECT_TREE.md from RunicGateway/website@66bb3b9 [skip ci] 2026-09-01 13:58:11 +00:00
a03401bb66 Merge pull request 'docs: the engagement workstream — cutover 1 of 7 (edgemain)' (#200) from edge into main
Reviewed-on: #200
Reviewed-by: Colby Whitlock <whitlocktech@gmail.com>
2026-09-01 13:54:13 +00:00
bb0e262be2 Merge pull request 'docs(website): the engagement release note — three things that arrive switched off' (#199) from docs/engagement-phase-13-upgrade-notes into edge
Reviewed-on: #199
Reviewed-by: Colby Whitlock <whitlocktech@gmail.com>
2026-09-01 13:50:45 +00:00
c57c0e6b37 docs(website): the engagement release note -- three things that arrive switched off
The cutover's operator-facing note, in the home Phase 1 created. Phase 13 owes it, and
two earlier phases named it as their own obligation: Phase 6 for the Team rules
(decision 3) and Phase 11 for news.post (7.1 Q9). Both stop mail or push that is
sending today, and neither says anything when it does.

Three required actions, ordered, because the order is load-bearing:

  1. Update the shard. The protocol pin lives in the UO module's schema, so it is the
     MODULE update -- not the core one -- that moves uo_link_config.protocol to 5 and
     starts the site sending X-UOLink-Version: 5. A shard still on 4 answers 409 from
     that boot on. Named explicitly, along with the out: update the site and leave the
     module until the shard host can be reached.
  2. Team email arrives disabled -- four rules, the screen's own banner, and the fact
     that only email moved (the tickle and the Discord bridge are untouched).
  3. News push stops until the seeded rule is switched on.

Four behaviour changes that need no action: the unsubscribe link now narrows to one
channel rather than muting outright, email and push are opt-in while the in-app inbox
is on, a rule is checked against its trigger's audience ceiling, and a bounce now
suppresses an address with Suppressions the only screen that lifts one.

Two claims were checked against the tree rather than the plan, and one of them was
wrong first time: coreApi is enforced at LOAD, not at install, so an old core does not
refuse the 0.5.0 install -- it accepts it and then fails to load the module. The note
says that, and says the restart is required, because modules are read from disk at boot.

The Data section carries Phase 12's finding 2 rather than burying it: nothing in this
schema expires on its own.

AI-assisted: written with Claude Code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 08:35:38 -05:00
1dfc786fe8 Merge pull request 'docs(engagement): Phase 12 as built — the 12a/12b split and three findings' (#198) from docs/engagement-phase-12 into edge
Reviewed-on: #198
2026-09-01 13:19:22 +00:00
e5c0a0c64f docs(engagement): Phase 12 as built -- the 12a/12b split and three findings
Records Phase 12 against runicgateway.com#26 (12a, mergeable) and #27 (12b, a draft held
for the cutover window).

The split is the org lead's decision, and building the phase sharpened the reason the
timing note only gestured at: checkFacts.mjs fetches from `main`, so the moment
platform.json says protocol 5 the repo is red for the whole edge window -- and three of
its values cannot be written today at all, because bundle.tag/sidecar/overlay name an
artefact that does not exist until Phase 13 republishes it.

Phase 13's order gains the fill-in step, written to be mechanical rather than remembered:
the check names its own expected values, so it is "run checkFacts and copy the says
column", plus the two pages that quote the bundle to re-read first.

Two of the phase's own statements were already stale. moduleApi is 1.9.0, not 1.7.0
(Phase 11 moved it twice after that sentence was written), and Phase 7 had already fixed
the capabilities.mjs "Web" claim. Phase 13's step 3 corrected to 1.9.0 as well.

Three findings, none of them in the phase's text:

  1. /privacy had been publishing a false sentence since Phase 8 -- app-content claimed
     nothing is cached offline, and Phase 8 shipped a DataStore snapshot of the inbox.
     That row is an INPUT to the generated Play Data Safety answers, so it is a store
     review matter rather than a doc nit.
  2. Nothing in the engagement schema has a retention sweep. cooldowns' prune() has no
     caller, finished outbox rows are never deleted, and the send log and suppression
     list grow forever. Recorded rather than fixed -- a sweep is a website change and
     outside this phase.
  3. The one page whose whole subject is the protocol number was the one page that
     hardcoded it, against platform.json's own rule. Plus the trap for whoever does this
     again: MDX does not evaluate an expression inside backticks.

AI-assisted: written with Claude Code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 08:16:51 -05:00
0105e294d5 Merge pull request 'docs(engagement): Phase 11b's live walk — three decisions and six defects' (#197) from docs/engagement-phase-11b-walk into edge
Reviewed-on: #197
2026-09-01 12:31:47 +00:00
cd0d22a225 docs(engagement): Phase 11b's live walk — three decisions and six defects
The walk is the last piece of 11b and it was not a formality. It found six
defects, four of them in code shipped by earlier phases, and none of the six was
visible in a unit test: each is a disagreement between two things that agree with
each other in a fixture.

Three of the fixes were decisions rather than repairs, all settled by the org
lead before any code:

  11  `uo.house.idoc_warning` ships delay_seconds: 900 and nothing could cancel
      it  ->  add `uo.house.refreshed`, a 26th trigger with a body and a rule
  12  a rule with a cooldown delivered on exactly ONE of its channels
          ->  `channel` joins the cooldown key; a cooldown is per DELIVERY
  13  `uo.vendor.expiring` could not fire, because the market sweep does not
      diff fees  ->  widen BridgeMarket.Signature() with exempt +
      periodsRemaining

Files:

  website/ENGAGEMENT.md   the three decisions, the four repairs, and what the
                          walk proved rung by rung; the 11b bullet and the §8.6
                          family table now read 26 triggers / 34 bodies
  website/BACKEND_DESIGN.md  engagement_cooldowns gains `channel` in its PRIMARY
                          KEY, with the migration's information_schema guard and
                          why MariaDB forces one
  link/v5.md              the sweep has to DIFF the fees or the frame never
                          comes -- stated as the general rule for the next
                          enrichment, since it is emit cadence and not shape
  modules/uo/API.md       §5.7a the cancel-shaped trigger and the Ageless-vs-
                          LikeNew ServUO fact; §5.7b every link comes from
                          config/clientPaths.js, and the two mistakes that made
                          every call-to-action a dead link

Pairs with website#<core>, Module-uo#<uo> and servuo-plugins#<plugin>.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 07:13:03 -05:00
c9873eff7d Merge pull request 'docs(engagement): Phase 11b — the seed API, the in-universe voice, the governor's letter' (#196) from docs/engagement-phase-11b into edge
Reviewed-on: #196
2026-09-01 06:18:51 +00:00
9d50e5cacf docs(engagement): Phase 11b — the seed API, the in-universe voice, the governor's letter
Four decisions settled by the org lead before any 11b code, plus MODULE_API
1.9.0 and what building it found.

DECISION 7 is the one 11a could not have discovered, because 11a seeded nothing.
The plan's own sentence — "24 rules, all enabled = 0; bespoke template bodies" —
described work with NO MECHANISM to land in: templateSeeds.js and coreRules.js
are core files with core arrays, and registries.js has no registerTemplates.
Adds api.registerEngagementSeeds({ templates, ruleGroups }). Templates re-ensure
every boot; rule groups are one-shot per named group, which is 11a's seed-key
finding stated as an API rather than as a warning.

DECISION 8: the game-powered families read in-universe, with a per-family sender
rather than one voice. The crown writes about the crown's business and nothing
else. This is also why the bodies had to be the module's: §5.2 says core stays
ignorant of a module's domain, and check:modules reads identifiers, never prose —
so the boundary is honoured deliberately here rather than leaned on.

DECISION 9: nine bodies stay plain. A failed-login notice written as a letter is
indistinguishable in register from the phishing mail it warns about.

DECISION 10 corrects a fact the plan had wrong by omission. §8.6 records that
uo.points.rank_changed cannot address a person, and the same reasoning was
silently assumed to cover the governor. city.update's `governor` is written by
BridgeJson.Actor(), which emits acct and webId — the new governor is addressable
today, no protocol change. uo.governor.appointed is the 25th trigger.

Also records what building it found: the no-conditionals/empty-string collision
that the presentational fragments exist for, the render sweep that found three
defects no check could see (an optional in a subject line, multi-optional detail
lines, a trailing fragment used as a leading one), the trigger-bound template
that could not reference its own unsubscribe link, and the trigger-id/template-key
grammar mismatch.

docs/modules/uo/API.md gains §5.7 and §5.8.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 01:14:53 -05:00
dc7d7c9a40 Merge pull request 'docs(engagement): scope Phase 11 — six decisions, three carve-outs, the 11a/11b split' (#194) from docs/engagement-phase-11-decisions into edge
Reviewed-on: #194
2026-09-01 05:05:39 +00:00
055236d0ad Merge pull request 'docs(engagement): MODULE_API 1.8.0, the UO trigger catalogue, the news publish path' (#195) from docs/engagement-phase-11a into edge
Reviewed-on: #195
2026-09-01 05:04:57 +00:00
561e5308e4 docs(engagement): MODULE_API 1.8.0, the UO trigger catalogue, the news path
The documentation half of Phase 11a (website#177, Module-uo#22). Three files,
each carrying one obligation from 6.0b's Phase 11a row.

**MODULE_API.md -> 1.8.0.** A seventh audience ceiling, `admin`, as a child of
`staff`. One addition, no removal, so minor -- every declaration valid under
1.7.0 is valid now and no stored value changes. 2.4's ceiling bullet now names
seven values rather than six, and says the thing a module author actually needs:
`admin` is the ONLY pair in the whole lattice with real containment, so
`permits('staff','admin')` holds and it is the only place `permits` is true
between two values below `authenticated`.

Also corrects two 2.3 rows that were stale rather than wrong: `ctx.inbox.push`
has not thrown since Phase 7, and both members now name the consumer that
actually calls them.

**modules/uo/API.md gains 5**, the full trigger catalogue -- which 6.0b asked for
in as many words ("the full trigger catalogue, its audiences and its ceilings,
not one entry"). The 24 triggers grouped by ceiling with the reason for each
ceiling; the four rows that deliberately do NOT ship with their recorded reasons;
the two that need a patch tier or a v5 overlay; the three things a rule cannot
express and are therefore done in the mapper; the three registered audiences; and
the ingest ORDERING, which is load-bearing rather than incidental.

**BACKEND_DESIGN.md -- the news publish path.** It described a direct
`pushDispatch.publish('news.post', ...)` from the create/publish-post path. That
call is gone: it is an emit through the engagement engine now, so news push rides
a rule, and core seeds that rule disabled. The note says so as an operator-visible
upgrade step, names the separate one-shot settings key and states what did NOT
change -- the announce legs and the post hooks still fire exactly as they did.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 20:34:31 -05:00
77c615bc69 docs(engagement): scope Phase 11 — six decisions, three carve-outs, the 11a/11b split
Phase 11 was widened on 2026-08-31 to ship every  row of §8.6 rather than a
single rule, and the phase text asked for its 11a/11b split to be confirmed with
the org lead before any code. Confirming it turned up five further questions the
plan had not asked, three of which change what ships — so this records all six
before implementation starts, on Phase 2's precedent.

The three carve-outs all came from checking §8.6's rows against what the WEBSITE
can address rather than against what the wire carries:

  • uo.guild.joined duplicates core's team.member.joined — a UO guild IS a Team
    and teamSync already emits on every roster reconcile, so an operator who
    enables the obvious two rules gets two mails for one join. `left` and
    `disbanded` still ship; core has no equivalent for either.
  • uo.link.requested has no addressable recipient by construction (the account
    is not yet linked) and a ~5-minute TTL no channel can beat.
  • uo.points.rank_changed ships `subscribers` only: points.board's top[] names
    a mobile serial and shard_account_links is keyed by account, so the personal
    half would reach some players and silently not others.

The other three:

  • The lattice gains `admin`, as a child of `staff` — the operator-facing family
    is described as admin-audience everywhere and `staff` is admin/editor/
    moderator, so ceilinging it there would mail the staff audit digest to every
    editor. It is the only genuine refinement in the tree, so permits/meet/
    meetAll are untouched. MODULE_API_VERSION → 1.8.0.
  • §7.1 Q9 (news.post continuity): the emit REPLACES the raw tickle and core
    seeds the rule disabled — the Phase 6 precedent. News push stops on upgrade;
    the admin banner and the release note are the mitigations, and both are named
    as phase deliverables.
  • The split is confirmed and specified: 11a is declarations/mappings/ceilings,
    server only, no rule or template seeded; 11b is the seeded set and the live
    walk.

Also records the threshold-trigger mechanism uo.vendor.expiring and
uo.economy.milestone need — rule conditions compare against literals only, so
"within 24 hours of dismissal" is not expressible as a condition and the crossing
is tracked module-side — and names module-uo's first three registered audiences.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 19:47:05 -05:00
7866bd7ab8 Merge pull request 'docs(link): protocol 5 — the decay schedule, vendor fee state and account.login.result' (#193) from docs/protocol-v5 into edge
Reviewed-on: #193
2026-09-01 00:27:27 +00:00
6304c42dfb docs(link): protocol 5 — the decay schedule, vendor fee state and account.login.result
Design of record for the bump, plus the reference updates it obliges.
Engagement Phase 10, as built.

link/v5.md is new. Three enrichments in one bump, because a bump costs a sidecar
release, a republished bundle and an operator update on every shard — a field left
out costs a whole second round of that, not a follow-up commit.

  a. house.decay gains ownerName and a nested `schedule`. estimatedCollapse is
     present ONLY where it is exact: under dynamic decay each stage's duration is
     drawn at random on entry, so collapse is knowable only once the house is
     already at IDOC; under static decay it is exact at every stage. Omitted
     rather than approximated — an absent field is honest where a wrong date
     becomes a dated promise in a player's mail.
  b. vendor.listing gains ownerAcct — a character name identifies nobody, only the
     game account joins to shard_account_links — and a `fees` block resolving
     PlayerVendor.PayTimer's dismissal rule into a dismissalAt instant. There is
     deliberately no daysRemaining: a pay period is a UO day on an old-system
     shard, so the name would be wrong by a factor of twelve.
  c. account.login.result is a NEW kind. account.login.attempt fires from a veto
     hook that runs before the auth decision and constructs with Accepted = true,
     so it fires on successful logins too and cannot carry a verdict.

INTEGRATION.md: the version banner to 5, the Housing and Market field tables and
examples, and the new kind beside the attempt — with the attempt's own row
corrected to say why it is not a failure signal.

PLAN.md: 5.1's "failed-login signals" row was wrong about what AccountLogin can
tell you; 5.3 and 5.4 gain the two new signals; 5.4's dynamic-decay model gets the
consequence for publishing a collapse time, and the CanDecay rule gets its testing
trap. 7's frames are marked as 1.0's design sketch rather than the shipped wire,
which they have not been for four versions.

ENGAGEMENT.md: Phase 10 as built. Two decisions taken during the build (both field
groups nested, so one admin rule governs each and a future field inherits the gate;
no daysRemaining), the three visibility classifications, and the pin improvement —
the schema test now asserts the declarations AGREE rather than that they all say a
literal, which is the protocol-4 bug seen from the other side.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 19:19:09 -05:00
efce1d88aa docs(engagement): widen Phase 10 to three wire enrichments and Phase 11 to the full trigger catalogue
Two scope decisions taken by the org lead on 2026-08-31, before any Phase 10 code,
plus the three factual corrections that finding them out produced.

Phase 10 — the protocol bump now carries three enrichments, not one. The argument is
specific to this phase: a bump costs a sidecar release, a republished bundle and an
operator update on every shard, so a field left out does not cost a follow-up commit,
it costs a second bump with the same lead time and a split operator population. The
two additions:

  * player-vendor fee state on vendor.listing (ownerAcct, holdGold, chargePerDay,
    daysRemaining), because uo.vendor.expiring is the same "owned asset at risk with
    a deadline" shape as the flagship and today has neither an address nor a deadline;
  * a post-decision account.login.result, because EventSink.AccountLogin is a veto
    hook that fires BEFORE the auth decision.

Moving vendor.sale out of the opt-in patch tier was explicitly declined.

Phase 11 — ships every checked row of 8.6 rather than a single rule, carving out
uo.market.item_listed (a saved search; no per-user query store exists). ~23 triggers
grouped by the audience kind each family exercises, since exercising the ceiling
lattice at scale is the point rather than volume of mail. Every rule still ships
enabled = 0 per Q3. Notes that the phase will likely want an 11a/11b split on the
4a/4b precedent, to confirm at its start.

Three corrections to 8.6, each verified against the emitters rather than the table:

  * uo.vendor.sale is real and does carry ownerAcct, but lives in servuo-plugins/
    patches/ (opt-in, verified only against ServUO 57.4) — dormant, not broken, on a
    shard that declined the tier;
  * uo.vendor.expiring had no data at all, not merely no mapper — vendor.listing
    carries ownerSerial/ownerName and nothing carries held gold or daily charge;
  * uo.account.login_attempt could not have been built as described — it would have
    mailed "someone tried to log into your account" on every successful login.
    Renamed uo.account.login_failed so the id cannot be misread again.

Also amended: the status header, scope decision 3, and 6.0b's documentation
assignment for rows 10 and 11 (v5.md now earned; the patch-tier caveat is an
operator-facing doc obligation; runicgateway.com's capability claim changes when
"one rule" becomes "the catalogue").

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 11:06:34 -05:00
33c0d71e4a Merge pull request 'docs(engagement): Phase 9 as built — deliverability, suppression and bounces' (#191) from docs/engagement-deliverability into edge
Reviewed-on: #191
2026-08-31 15:53:11 +00:00
221c5a9c9e docs(engagement): Phase 9 as built — deliverability, suppression and bounces
Records what Phase 9 shipped (website#176) and the four decisions the org lead
settled before any of it: mechanism plus SMTP's own synchronous refusal rather
than an API transport; suppression scoped to engagement rules only; an
`address_masked` column added to §4.5's DDL; and the verification gate applied at
enqueue rather than at delivery.

The correction the phase's own text needed: "SMTP has none" is too strong. SMTP
has no asynchronous bounce feed, but a single-recipient send refused at RCPT TO
throws synchronously with the reply code intact, and mailer.js was already
catching that and discarding it.

The defect worth not repeating: `PERMANENT_CODES` is not a bounce classifier. It
answers "is retrying pointless?" and contains EAUTH, so suppressing on it would
have emptied the mailing list the first time an SMTP password expired.

Also records the one thing only the live rig could find — `engagement_sends`
has carried a `bounced` status since §4.5 and nothing had ever written it, so the
Send Log's Bounced filter matched nothing — and answers §7.1 Q1's narrower half.

- ENGAGEMENT.md: Phase 9 "As built", the §4.5 DDL, Q1's narrower half, status header
- BACKEND_DESIGN.md: §3 `engagement_suppressions`, and §7's Deliverability section

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 10:49:04 -05:00
400873b83a Merge pull request 'docs(engagement): the in-app channel on Android, as built (Phase 8)' (#190) from docs/engagement-inapp-android into edge
Reviewed-on: #190
2026-08-31 14:36:33 +00:00
b1851ad8c1 docs(engagement): the in-app channel on Android, as built (Phase 8)
Records Phase 8 and answers §7.1 Q8, leaving Q9 as the only open question.

ENGAGEMENT.md gains the phase's as-built section: the four decisions settled
first, the relative-url finding the live rig caught (Phase 7's contract is
relative-only, and the client half of that contract was never written down), the
ref-not-stream routing rule, the (base URL, user id) snapshot scoping that is the
actual security property, and the on-device walk. Its Status paragraph was six
phases stale and now names every phase that has landed.

android/PLAN.md §7's "no offline caching, no Room in v1" decision STANDS and now
names its one exception, with the limit it comes with: the snapshot serves a
running app, not a cold start, because the shell gates the whole app on loading
the site's appearance. Widening Phase 8 into the shell's startup model is the
org lead's call, so it is written up rather than done. §11 gains the inbox and
the per-channel screen as built.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 09:28:07 -05:00
feeb2cac11 Merge pull request 'docs(website): §7.1 Q9 — core's own news.post emitter' (#189) from docs/engagement-news-emitter-note into edge
Reviewed-on: #189
2026-08-31 07:30:54 +00:00
66257ebcb5 docs(website): §7.1 Q9 — core's own news.post emitter
`news.post` is a declared trigger with no caller: `coreTriggers.js` says so in
as many words, and Phase 6 migrated only the four `team.*` ones. A rule naming
it can never fire, so on a real deployment the only in-app or email items the
engine can produce today come from Teams. Phase 7 flagged it in passing; this
writes it down properly as an open question.

The substance is not the call — it is the three other things a news publish
already fires, and which of them the engine has any business replacing:

- the announce leg (`announce_job_legs`, `module-uo` owns `towncrier`) — a
  one-shot delivery to a channel of the deployment, with retry. NOT the
  engine's.
- a module's post hook (`registerPostHook`) — idempotent state mirroring that
  also runs on delete and refreshes on a silent edit. NOT the engine's.
- the raw `pushDispatch.publish('news.post', …)` — a per-person notification.
  THIS is the one that becomes an emit.

So modules keep both doors onto a news publish and neither changes. What a
module does not get is the ability to fire `news.post` itself — the id's owner
is core, `emit` binds the owner at the call, and §7.2's one namespace gives an
id exactly one owner across both facets. A module wanting its own person-facing
news notification declares its own trigger.

Three things to settle first, recorded rather than decided: continuity (the
emit replacing the tickle stops push silently until a rule is enabled — G22's
shape, and Phase 6 decision 3's), reusing the job-id transition signal rather
than re-deriving it, and which phase owns it. Recommended home: Phase 11, whose
title understates it — a pointer and an extra acceptance line land there too.

Code: RunicGateway/website#175

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2fd5d065b7)
2026-08-31 02:28:20 -05:00
3274c7864c Merge pull request 'docs(website): the in-app channel as built (engagement Phase 7)' (#188) from docs/engagement-inapp-channel into edge
Reviewed-on: #188
2026-08-31 07:23:05 +00:00
d9abe3d941 docs(website): the in-app channel as built (engagement Phase 7)
ENGAGEMENT.md gains the Phase 7 as-built: the four decisions the org lead
settled before any code (in-app defaults to `instant`; the phase takes push's
`deliver` and the web preferences screen; the inbox takes `/notifications` and
the settings move under it; `ctx.inbox.push` respects a preference where one
exists), the block-role mapping that turns a template into a row, and five
things the tree contradicted or the build found — including the one only the
live rig could see, that staff had no reachable inbox at all.

Two earlier passages amended where the phase made them false: Phase 2's
"`ctx.inbox.push` throws until Phase 7" and Phase 3's "`inapp` is declared
`off`". Both kept as history with the correction beside them.

BACKEND_DESIGN.md gains the four inbox routes in the `/auth/me` table and a
`user_notifications` entry in the table inventory — the user-scoped dedupe
index, why `body` is text rather than the email HTML, and the retention policy.

Code: RunicGateway/website#TBD

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 02:11:46 -05:00
73c3a467e7 Merge pull request 'docs(website): the email channel and the Teams migration as built (engagement Phase 6)' (#187) from docs/engagement-email-channel into edge
Reviewed-on: #187
2026-08-31 06:07:57 +00:00
c93151b352 docs(website): the email channel and the Teams migration as built (engagement Phase 6)
ENGAGEMENT.md gains the Phase 6 as-built: the seven decisions settled up front,
the audience problem that shaped the phase, why scope_key is not subject_key, the
one place decision 4 as phrased could not ship, the projection's rule and what it
refuses to guess, the digest correcting Phase 4a rather than only implementing
§4.2b, and the three defects the build found. §4.2b and §6.0b updated with it.

TEAMS.md §6.4 rewritten: the pipeline it described no longer exists as its own
thing. It now says which of the three sinks moved and which did not, where each
of the four properties it always claimed lives now, that Team email is OFF until
an operator turns a rule on, and what the generalized unsubscribe token does.
§6.3's `last_digest_at` is marked as no longer read.

BACKEND_DESIGN.md: engagement_digest_state, engagement_outbox.scope_key, and the
unsubscribe routes — the canonical /public/engagement pair plus the /public/teams
path kept permanently because mail is not editable once sent.

Code: RunicGateway/website#TBD

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 20:12:15 -05:00
2161119c8c Merge pull request 'docs(website): the template editor as built (engagement Phase 5b)' (#186) from docs/engagement-template-editor into edge
Reviewed-on: #186
2026-08-29 23:37:22 +00:00
556124562b docs(website): the template editor as built (engagement Phase 5b)
ENGAGEMENT.md gains an "As built - 5b" section and BACKEND_DESIGN.md the eight
routes under /admin/engagement.

The scope decision is recorded first because the plan contradicted itself: the
Phase 5 body names only the editor, while Q4's answer and 6.2 both promise
"Triggers, Templates and the send log" in Phase 5. All three shipped - leaving
either out would have left the nav group half-built and G15 open with the rows
already on disk.

Five more decisions, each because the tree said something the plan did not: the
preview is rendered server-side and framed; `status` is now enforced by
renderByKey; a test send is logged under a synthetic trigger rather than making
the column nullable; a template a rule uses refuses deletion with a 409; and
duplicate is the only creation path.

Also records the correction that changed the most code - 4.6.2 says duplicate is
how a protected template is customized, the schema says "Editable, NOT deletable",
and the org lead's ruling is the schema's - and the three things only building it
found, including the Phase 4a template-key pattern that could not match any key
this system uses.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 18:14:12 -05:00
c03dfc14ba Merge pull request 'docs(website): the seeded template set as built (engagement Phase 5a)' (#185) from docs/engagement-templates into edge 2026-08-29 18:13:47 +00:00
aa5c1d63b0 docs(website): the seeded template set as built (engagement Phase 5a)
Companion to website#TBD. §6.0b assigns this phase two documents; both land here.

ENGAGEMENT.md gains an "As built — 5a" section: the three decisions the survey
forced, the argument for two registries rather than one, why the ternaries stayed
at the call site, and the two behaviour changes an operator will notice.

BACKEND_DESIGN.md gains the `engagement_templates` table, the two-block-registry
split, the token grammar, and the §7 note that mail is now multipart.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 13:07:50 -05:00
315a7c7fca Merge pull request 'docs(website): the engagement admin surface as built (Phase 4b)' (#184) from docs/engagement-rules-admin into edge
Reviewed-on: #184
2026-08-29 17:29:06 +00:00
73e1669a5c docs(website): the browser pass on the engagement screens (Phase 4b)
Six defects that only driving the two screens in a browser could find, plus two
environment facts worth not re-deriving:

  - rebuilding client/dist while the server is running blanks the whole SPA. The
    HTML shell resolves core's hashed bundle filename at boot, so after a
    rebuild it points at a file that no longer exists; core's bundle 404s,
    window.__rg is never published, and modules/uo/entry.js throws MODULE_API.md
    §3.1's "core did not publish its shared dependencies" into a blank page. The
    error names core, and core is not at fault. Restart after every build.
  - a window.confirm blocks CDP entirely, so the two destructive actions cannot
    be driven from a script and a session that opens one is stuck until a human
    dismisses it. Exercise those paths over the API.

- [x] AI-assisted: written with Claude Code (Opus)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 12:26:41 -05:00
97b652fed3 docs(website): the engagement admin surface as built (Phase 4b)
Companion to website#171.

ENGAGEMENT.md gains an "As built - 4b" section: the four decisions the org lead
settled, the correctness argument behind the standalone enable route, the three
honesty fields on the reach preview, and the two defects the live walk found in
Phase 4a's own code (a rule pointing at a dormant segment reading as healthy,
and the delete refusal's "1 rule still use"). It also records the throwaway
module rig that made the whole segment half walkable at all - core declares no
audiences, so on a stock local stack none of the §5.1a arithmetic can be
exercised without one.

§5.1a gains the composition UI it was owed: its own nav entry rather than a tab,
"exclude" offered only under "all of", the stored ceiling displayed and never
chosen, and a tree nested deeper than the composer renders shown read-only
rather than flattened.

BACKEND_DESIGN.md's route table gains the twelve routes, including why the
enable switch is a PATCH of one column and why deleting a segment in use is a
409 rather than a cascade.

- [x] AI-assisted: written with Claude Code (Opus)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 12:10:18 -05:00
5924276fe7 Merge pull request 'docs(website): the engagement engine as built (Phase 4a)' (#183) from docs/engagement-engine into edge
Reviewed-on: #183
2026-08-29 13:24:26 +00:00
deaf491dc5 docs(website): the engagement engine as built (Phase 4a)
Companion to website#170. Section 6.0b's assignment for Phase 4 - ENGAGEMENT.md's
as-built and BACKEND_DESIGN.md's table inventory - plus the two corrections
building it forced on this document's own design sections.

ENGAGEMENT.md
  - Phase 4 is split 4a / 4b, with what each owes.
  - Section 7.1 Q2 and Q4 answered, so seven of eight are settled and only Q8
    (android CI) is open.
  - The as-built: the gate order and why two of its placements are load-bearing,
    the segment rule the design never stated (not is legal only inside an and,
    and contributes no ceiling), dormancy three ways and why audience_segment_id
    has no foreign key, the conditions grammar's two fail-closed properties, and
    why emit does not await the engine.
  - Section 4.1's cooldown statement and section 4.2a's dedupe index are
    corrected in place, so the design sections stop teaching the two defects.

BACKEND_DESIGN.md
  - Five new tables in the schema inventory, each with the reasoning a reader
    would otherwise have to reconstruct: why subject_key is in the primary key,
    why the dedupe index is scoped, why the send log survives an account
    deletion and is not a second address book, and why a rule points at a
    segment without a foreign key doing it.

No route table changes - Phase 4a adds no routes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 08:07:42 -05:00
713e6fa6c8 Merge pull request 'docs(website): per-channel notification preferences (engagement Phase 3)' (#182) from docs/engagement-channel-prefs into edge
Reviewed-on: #182
2026-08-29 12:11:04 +00:00
7b7a26f0ac docs(website): per-channel notification preferences (engagement Phase 3)
The documentation §6.0b assigns Phase 3 — `BACKEND_DESIGN.md`'s route table and
`android/PLAN.md` §11 — plus the phase's as-built section and one correction the
build forced.

`ENGAGEMENT.md`:
- Phase 3's as-built: the three decisions settled before any code, why the
  channel registry could not wait for Phase 6, what the sparse PUT buys, the
  projection stated as an invariant, and the staff-ceiling filter.
- **The phase's own acceptance line was wrong and is struck through.** "A fresh
  user's … push defaults `instant`" reads naturally beside §3.1's "email opt-IN,
  push opt-OUT", but §3.1 borrowed that from `team_notification_prefs`, where no
  row genuinely does mean notified. Push STREAM subscriptions have never worked
  that way — `notification_subscriptions` holds a row only on opt-in — so
  `instant` would have projected the entire catalog into the legacy GET for
  every existing user. §3.1's comment is corrected in the same pass.

`BACKEND_DESIGN.md`: the `/me/notifications/channels` row, the
`notification_channel_prefs` table entry (including that absence means the
channel's default rather than `off`, and that all three agreeing on `off` today
is a fact about the declarations and not about the table), and a note on
`notification_subscriptions` that it is now the push projection.

`android/PLAN.md` §11: nothing above it changed — the shipped APK keeps working
and the `{"streams":[]}` gotcha still applies to that endpoint. The new section
documents the superset endpoint for whenever the app adopts it: render toggles
from each item's `channels` rather than a hardcoded three, `modes` is the
effective mode and the client must not re-implement the defaulting, the PUT is
sparse so the empty-array gotcha does NOT apply here, and one id may be missing
that the app expects (a `staff`-ceilinged trigger is not offered to a non-staff
caller).

Companion to website#169.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 07:09:16 -05:00
6c19a0608a Merge pull request 'docs(website): event triggers, audiences and the ceiling lattice (engagement Phase 2)' (#181) from docs/engagement-trigger-registry into edge
Reviewed-on: #181
2026-08-29 11:47:23 +00:00
58c0797fc2 docs(website): event triggers, audiences and the ceiling lattice (engagement Phase 2)
MODULE_API.md gets a real 1.7.0 — and §1.1's "1.6.0 has only ever been on
`edge`" paragraphs are now marked historical rather than current, which is the
correction §0.5 asked for: 1.6.0 reached `main` with the Teams cutover, so the
in-place-amendment rule those paragraphs invoke no longer applies and every
addition from here takes a version of its own.

§2.3 gains `ctx.events.emit` and `ctx.inbox.push` (present and throwing until
Phase 7, with the reason stated). §2.4 gains `registerEventTriggers` and
`registerAudiences`. A new §6.8 carries the forward-compat note ENGAGEMENT.md
§7.3 asked this document to hold: a rule, a template and an audience outlive
the module that declared them, so `trigger_id` is a plain VARCHAR with no
cascade and an unregistered id shows DORMANT rather than erroring or being
auto-deleted. The failure that prevents is specific — an id that stops
resolving must never silently become a send to a different set of people.

ENGAGEMENT.md records Phase 2 as built, and three things it did not previously
say:

§5.1a now DEFINES the ceiling lattice. The document named "narrowest" and
"tightest" throughout and never said what narrower meant, and the obvious
reading is a security defect: under a flat total order a `staff`-ceilinged
trigger permits an `owner` audience, i.e. a rule that mails cheat detection to
the player it detected. It is containment, not size, and incomparable ceilings
have no bound at all.

§7.2 is answered — ONE namespace, against the recommendation in its own text —
with the two knock-on effects that only appeared once it was built (a relaxed
id grammar, a shared legacy allowlist) and the risk that did not materialise
(the push catalog is untouched, so the shipped app sees no change).

§7.1 Q6 is answered: declare `kind: 'scheduled'` now, build the evaluator after
Phase 9.

§4.3 is kept true to what shipped: `audience` and `ceiling` are two fields
rather than one, `'computed'` is gone from the audience vocabulary, and
`example` is enforced rather than encouraged.

§6.0b's Phase 2 row is corrected. Its two "other repos" cells are cutover-window
work, not this window: the integration kit pins a website `main` sha and
runicgateway.com FETCHES its facts from `main`, so doing either now would turn a
green repo red for the whole edge period — for the kit, against the explicit
rule in its own pin ("written against what shipped, never what is in flight").

BACKEND_DESIGN.md gains the two admin routes, the router-tree entry and the
adminOnly line; api-route-inventory.json regenerated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 06:40:48 -05:00
88de7e3331 Merge pull request 'docs(website): unique, changeable, verifiable email addresses (engagement Phase 1b)' (#180) from docs/unique-verifiable-email into edge
Reviewed-on: #180
2026-08-29 07:08:29 +00:00
84481ee6b1 docs(website): unique, changeable, verifiable email addresses (engagement Phase 1b)
Companion to website#<pr>. Records Phase 1b as built, and corrects two things
the plan got wrong before anyone builds on them.

ENGAGEMENT.md
  - Phase 1b step 2 said to pin the index to a case-insensitive collation. Every
    _ci collation MariaDB offers here is also accent-insensitive, so that index
    would refuse jose@x.com once josé@x.com existed and the de-duplication would
    have cleared a legitimate account's address. The as-built block records the
    generated-column design that shipped instead, and the second-order version of
    the same bug that a seeded fixture caught in the de-dupe query itself.
  - §0.6 named two callers of isDuplicateUsername(). There are five, and the
    three it omits fail worse than the two it names.

BACKEND_DESIGN.md — the users table (already stale: it predated the player
account work), plus email_verifications and email_dedupe_report, and the five
new routes.

UPGRADE_NOTES.md — an operator entry, because the de-duplication is the kind of
quiet change this file exists for: nothing breaks, and the affected users find
out the next time they try to reset a password.

api-route-inventory.json — regenerated from the manifest; still ungated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 01:54:05 -05:00