Commit Graph

350 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
4c9b2e7e9c docs(website): settle phase 4's shape — delivery
Phase 3 closed with core at 158 routes and module-uo releasable; phase 4 is
the first phase that is not about the boundary. It answers how a module gets
onto a box an operator owns, and how it comes off again.

Adds MODULE_SYSTEM.md §2.7.2 recording the measured starting state (the
producer side is finished — module-uo's release.yml already publishes the
tarball, the install manifest and SHA256SUMS, and module.json declares
purge.sql — while core has the installed_modules provenance columns and
nothing that fetches, verifies, unpacks or purges), the four org-lead
decisions, the five slices, the unpack threat model and the acceptance table.

The four decisions:

1. Restart is a button. Install, uninstall and re-enable only take effect at
   boot; recording a pending change and telling the operator to restart the
   container contradicts §2.4's "no shell access to the box", so an admin
   action runs the shutdown and exits, and the supervisor the shipped compose
   file already declares brings it back.
2. The install source is a pasted manifest URL, not a catalog — a catalog
   would make core's release cadence decide which modules exist. Safety is the
   declared sha256 plus an https host allowlist, which also stops the endpoint
   being an SSRF primitive.
3. Disable dispatches that one module's onShutdown before flipping the guard.
   As built, disable makes a module invisible rather than stopped — module-uo
   keeps its sidecar socket open and keeps ingesting into shard_* tables —
   which is wrong for the case the button exists for. Enable is not the mirror:
   there is no onBoot re-dispatch and the hooks were never promised re-entrant,
   so enable flips the row and offers the restart.
4. The declarative Docker set is an environment variable, resolved before the
   server starts, idempotent and offline-safe: an already-unpacked module at
   the declared version is a no-op.

Amends §2.4 (disable is no longer a pure guard flip) and §2.5 (what "admin
selects the module" and "restart" concretely mean). Records re-entrant
lifecycle hooks as a second candidate for a future MODULE_API major bump,
beside the identity-provider gap the rust dry run found.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 02:31:20 -05:00
d171253715 Merge pull request 'docs(website): close phase 3 — slice 5, the fragment obligation, and the rust dry run' (#140) from docs/module-close-phase3 into main
Reviewed-on: #140
2026-08-12 04:11:11 +00:00
872352389d docs(website): close phase 3 — slice 5, the fragment obligation, and the rust dry run
Records the slice that closes the extraction, and adds the two documents phase 3
owed: docs/modules/uo/ and the module-rust dry run.

**The slice found an obligation neither repo had built.** MODULE_API.md §2.8 and
§6.1a settle the OpenAPI fragment in detail — a module ships one, core merges the
fragments of started modules into /api/docs.json. Neither half existed, so the 72
URLs module-uo serves were in no spec at all. §2.8 and §6.1a now record what was
built, including the four things settled while building it: the filename is fixed
rather than declared, a module namespaces what it DEFINES and references core's
shared schemas by core's name, the generator derives its prefixes from the
module's own register() call, and swagger-autogen's diagnostics have to be
captured because it reports a broken annotation and then prints Success.

**§5.3 gains the design decision the frozen manifest actually made:** it is a
SUBTRACTION, not a prefix filter. Generating the manifest without the module and
then with it answers "what does the module serve" AND "did core lose anything",
and the second is the one §1.2 promises to the shipped Android app. A module that
shadowed a core route cannot appear as an addition anywhere.

**BACKEND_DESIGN.md §4.0.1** is new: /api/docs.json is assembled per request, the
two generated artifacts are core's alone, and the route count was still 228.

**docs/modules/** is new, per §2.10 (module documentation aggregates here, not in
module repos): docs/modules/uo/README.md orients a reader on what module-uo
serves, owns and needs from an operator, and links out to the feature docs that
already existed rather than restating them.

**docs/modules/rust-dryrun.md** is phase 3's fourth acceptance criterion. A
written, deliberately unimplemented module for Rust — chosen because it wipes
monthly, runs several servers rather than one shard, identifies by Steam, and
ships RCON so there is no sidecar to write. The contract generalises: same
manifest, same seven registration calls, same schema rules, and six of the UI
kit's seven members wanted by a game with nothing in common with the one the kit
was curated from.

It found one real gap — **a module cannot register an identity provider**, and
"Sign in with Steam" is what a Rust community expects. Recorded as the first
candidate for a future MODULE_API_VERSION bump rather than bolted on: an identity
provider participates in session creation, and §2.7's link-only SSO policy has to
survive it.

Also: website-README.md refreshed from the repo (it was several changes stale),
and three settled decisions added (18-20).

Pairs with Module-uo#6 and website#141.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 23:05:56 -05:00
404158b10f Merge pull request 'docs(website): record slice 4, and the §5.2 check as built' (#139) from docs/module-de-uo-core into main
Reviewed-on: #139
2026-08-12 03:00:36 +00:00
472e510f6f docs(website): record slice 4, and the §5.2 check as built
MODULE_SYSTEM.md §2.7.1 gains the slice 4 record: the 190 dead lines of UO API
bindings slice 3 left behind (with zero consumers, which is why nothing caught
them), the copy rewrite and why the words stay in code rather than becoming a
config surface, the two settings rows core had no business seeding, and the
check that keeps all of it out. The slice table row is corrected to what
actually moved, and README.md is recorded as deliberately deferred to slice 5
rather than quietly skipped.

The defect gets its own subsection with the SQL, because it is a shape that will
recur: a guard in core and the statement it guards in a fragment run in the wrong
order, since core's schema is replayed in full before any fragment. Verified
against a real MariaDB in all three states, including the pinned-instance case
that makes it a one-shot rather than a re-bump.

MODULE_API.md §5.2 stops describing a grep and describes what was built — four
details promoted to contract because each was wrong first: whole-word matching
(a substring pass flags `defaultImage`, which contains "ultIma"), the
comments-then-strings character walk, grandfathering exemptions that fail the
build when they stop matching, and `git ls-files` over a directory walk.

BACKEND_DESIGN.md's settings table gains the keys a MODULE seeds, and the
ordering rule behind them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 21:55:03 -05:00
1b8c2e4806 Merge pull request 'docs(website): record slice 3, and MODULE_API 1.3.0' (#138) from docs/module-extract-client into main
Reviewed-on: #138
Reviewed-by: Colby Whitlock <whitlocktech@gmail.com>
2026-08-12 00:35:15 +00:00
931f77ef49 docs(website): record slice 3, and MODULE_API 1.3.0
The client half's move: 35 files / 5,332 lines (the table said 51 / ~3,700 and
is corrected, not re-derived to match). The seven-kit-members-plus-format claim
held exactly, so the kit needed no additions.

Contract, 1.2.0 -> 1.3.0, all additive: `icon` on a nav item, a third slot
`player.invite.accepted`, and `api.BASE` — which §3.5 specified from the first
draft and shared.js had never published, because nothing needed it until a
module had to build an EventSource URL.

§2.3's narrowing note said game-signup policy was core's business. It was wrong
in both directions: the setting's help text names Bridge.cfg, and slice 1 had
shipped a controller calling a function the narrowing does not expose, so
POST /player/shard/account answered 500 for every caller until this slice.

§3.7 gains the rule the invite slot needed: core may ask whether a slot is
filled when the answer changes CONTROL FLOW, never when it changes decoration.
Decoration goes inside `<Slot wrap>` — that is the footer-separator bug.

§7.7 gains what running it against the real module found, rather than a
throwaway: the unguarded portal icon, the relative-MODULES_DIR trap, and the two
operational notes (a module needs its own npm ci; copy the directory, never
symlink it).

Also recorded: the nav-override cost is worse than "a hidden row may reappear" —
the review instance had the nine UO rows gathered into a dropdown section, and
the whole section is lost. And `api-route-inventory.json` was a slice stale at
228 routes; refreshed to the 158 core actually serves.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 19:00:43 -05:00
fc05412070 Merge pull request 'docs(website): client extension slots, and the client half is one slice (phase 3, slice 2)' (#137) from docs/module-client-slots into main
Reviewed-on: #137
2026-08-11 21:54:07 +00:00
f47e2d3c6e Merge pull request 'docs(website): the server half does not slice, and slice 1's record' (#136) from docs/module-extract-server into main
Reviewed-on: #136
2026-08-11 21:53:20 +00:00
96b364b0bc docs(website): record slice 2, and what the browser changed about it
The contract as written had core branch on hasExtension to decide about its own
decoration around a slot. That is right when nothing is installed and wrong when
something is installed and fails: the slot IS filled, so the separator renders,
and the component then throws into the boundary and leaves the separator behind
on its own. Core decorates through <Slot wrap> now, inside the boundary, and
hasExtension is gone rather than kept as a trap for the next caller. Every unit
test passed both before and after -- the 7.7 browser smoke is what saw it.

Also recorded, neither a defect: core's own fill occupies a slot, so a module
cannot fill either one until the client half deletes core's (worth stating,
because a module written against 1.2.0 today cannot use them); and core's UO
sections on the user-detail page now fail to load, which is slice 1 removing the
routes rather than anything this slice did.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 16:46:11 -05:00
262c86ad4f docs(website): client extension slots, and the client half is one slice
Two findings from surveying the client half, and one org-lead decision that
turns them into the same piece of work.

The client half does not divide into public and admin after all. Routes slice by
area, but useShardFeed and shardEvents are imported by eight public pages AND
three admin views, and a shared leaf moves with its last consumer -- the same
rule the server half taught. Of the three ways out, two trade a real cost for a
boundary that lasts one review, so the client half is one slice. The nav rows
keep their feature provider as a consequence (rows without it fail open, so
disabled surfaces would advertise themselves again), and VendorSales turns out
to have no public consumer at all.

Its three consumers include core's own UserDetail, which renders six UO sections
with nowhere to put them: the server got declareSlot/registerExtension in phase
2 PR 4 and the client never got the twin. SiteFooter's link to a URL the
extraction deletes is the same gap one component over.

So slice 2 is core-only and adds rather than moves: client extension slots
(API 3.7), the site.footer.status and admin.users.detail slots, core filling
both itself. MODULE_API_VERSION goes to 1.2.0.

A slot is named for a PLACE, never for a meaning -- core supplies the position
and the styling, the module owns the label, the target, the data and whether it
renders at all. Typing a slot by its content would put game semantics back into
core, which is what this phase removes.

This is also the one slice where core merges before module-uo, because a chunk
cannot call registerExtension before the function exists. Harmless here: the
slice only adds, and core fills both slots with its own components under owner
id `core`, so the page is unchanged and the mechanism is proved before anything
moves.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 16:32:08 -05:00
f3a6231084 docs(website): record slice 1, and MODULE_API 1.1.0
The whole server half is out: 40 files, ~9,674 lines, 27 of 68 tables. The
acceptance criterion held exactly -- core's manifest goes 228 to 158 public
routes and the 70 that left reappear byte-identical once the module loads, with
routes.guards identical across all 228.

The contract grew to 1.1.0: ctx.activity.log, ctx.users.getById,
ctx.site.baseUrl, ctx.middleware.rateLimit + accountChangeLimiter, and a fourth
registry, registerPostHook. Each is documented with why it could not be
vendored, because that reasoning is the useful part -- an admin action a module
performs belongs in core's ONE audit log, a second rate-limit store is a limit
enforced by two counters, and core's CMS was calling a UO file directly.

§2.7.1 gains the slice record: the core.js port mechanism and its consequence
(require order is load-bearing), the vendoring line (pure leaf helpers may be
copied, security controls may not), the two core defects the extraction exposed,
the one deliberate behaviour change, and the one test that looked like it should
move and should not.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 12:11:09 -05:00
f402395fa5 docs(website): the server half does not slice, and why
Found before writing any of it. §2.7.1 split the server extraction five ways by
feature; it does not divide, because two contract rules compose.

A mount prefix is claimed whole -- ownedByCore probes the live tier router and
registerRoutes validates single-segment prefixes -- and /admin/shard is one
386-line router carrying 25 routes across atlas, clilocs, shard-ops, visibility,
market and account links. Meanwhile a model cannot be shared across the boundary
(§5.1), so it moves with the last route that consumes it. Take the closure and
every prefix is in it: /public/atlas holds shardAtlas with /admin/shard, which
holds shardState/shardEvents/shardMarket with /public/shard, which holds
uoLinkConfig with /admin/uo-link, and shardClilocs/shardLinks with /player/shard.

Landing any one of the old slices alone would either strand core importing
modules/uo/ -- what acceptance criterion 2 forbids -- or delete routes core is
still serving.

Giving the admin routes their own prefixes would divide it and is rejected: it
changes API URLs, which §1.2 promises not to do, and not hypothetically. The
shipped Android app calls POST /api/v1/admin/shard/kick, /ban, /unban,
/broadcast and the three /pages routes.

So the table is now six slices: 0 the skeleton (done), 1 the whole server half
as ONE PR per repo structured as five commits along the old slice lines, 2-4 the
client halves, 5 close the phase. The client half is unaffected and still slices
cleanly -- the registry takes routes per area, with no prefix atomicity and no
shared models, the same asymmetry that let the two halves be separated at all.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 01:50:37 -05:00
9930b375f2 Merge pull request 'docs(website): settle Phase 3's shape, correct the library build, record slice 0' (#135) from docs/module-phase3-plan into main
Reviewed-on: #135
2026-08-11 06:43:13 +00:00
7548c20820 docs(website): correct the library build, and record slice 0
Slice 0 built the module bundle skeleton against the contract and found that
§3.6 does not work as written. It shows Rollup's `external` alongside the
resolve aliases, and the two do not compose: Rollup asks `external` BEFORE
Vite's alias resolver runs, so a specifier in both is marked external and never
aliased. The chunk then emits bare `import "react"`, which no browser can
resolve without an import map, and CSP forbids the inline script an import map
has to be. It built cleanly and emitted exactly that.

§3.6 is corrected: alias only, `external` empty, with the alias table shown in
full because the anchoring is what stops `react` also capturing
`react/jsx-runtime`. What `external` was guarding -- a missed alias welding a
second React into the chunk -- moves to a resolution-time build plugin, and two
properties of that plugin are now contract because both were wrong first: it
hooks `transform` rather than `load` (first-wins, so it never ran), and its
forbidden-package list is stated rather than derived from the alias list
(deriving it means deleting an alias also deletes the guard).

Also records slice 0's outcome in §2.7.1, including the finding that generalises
past this repo: the boundary check failed on its own documentation, because the
comments describing what it catches are written in the syntax it catches. Slice
8's §5.2 grep has the same problem waiting for it. And the loader skips a
SYMLINKED module directory silently, which is the first thing to check when a
module fails to appear locally.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 01:33:38 -05:00
749233d378 docs(website): settle Phase 3's shape, slices and merge order
Phase 2 is closed, so Phase 3 needs a plan before any of it is extracted.
Four decisions, and one finding that set the first of them.

The finding: because API URLs are preserved (§1.2), a feature's server and
client halves are independent. Core's client keeps calling
/api/v1/public/shard/status after the module serves it, and a module page
calls the same URL while core still does. Nothing forces vertical slices, so
the extraction is server-first then client, sliced by feature, ten slices.

Merge order within a slice is module-uo first, then website. The loader's
ownedByCore probe stops a module LOADING while core owns its prefix, but the
module's own CI never loads it into core, so its PR merges fine beforehand --
and edge then serves the feature from core right up to the moment core drops
it, with no window where the branch is missing it outright.

Criterion 1's grep reads code, not prose: filenames, import specifiers, route
path literals and declared identifiers. Core's marketing copy legitimately
says "shard" in a dozen places and a literal word grep would have failed CI on
each while proving nothing about the boundary. That copy is rewritten in its
own slice instead, which is real work with a real review rather than an
exemption hidden in a pattern.

module-uo's CI clones core at a pinned ref to freeze its route manifest --
nothing else proves the URLs it claims are the URLs it serves -- and the
module-rust dry run lands in docs/modules/ where §2.10 already aggregates
module documentation.

Also records the measured surface (72 server files, 51 client, 32 test files),
which supersedes the Phase 0 estimate, and the one kit gap: lib/format.js is
vendored by the module rather than becoming an eighth §3.4 member.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 01:10:13 -05:00
12e4eaad10 Merge pull request 'docs(website): Phase 2 PR 9 — the modules mount, and Phase 2 complete' (#134) from docs/module-compose-volume into main
Reviewed-on: #134
2026-08-11 05:57:58 +00:00
8a7b099c2d docs(website): Phase 2 PR 9 — the modules mount, and Phase 2 complete
Records the last Phase 2 PR and closes the phase.

Amends §2.5: the mount is a bind mount of ./modules, not the named volume the
section reached for by analogy with uploads. Hand-placing a module directory is
a supported install in that same section, and a named volume routes it through
`docker cp` — the least discoverable mechanism Docker offers, for the one
install path an operator without the admin panel has.

Two things the build settled that the plan had not considered, both silent
failures rather than errors: the directory has to be tracked, because Docker
recreates a missing bind-mount source as root-owned and the container is uid
1000; and .dockerignore has to exclude it, because COPY . . would otherwise bake
a builder's checked-out module into every image — and Docker seeds a fresh named
volume from image contents, so it could have surfaced on a deployment that never
installed it.

MODULE_API §4.1 gains the concrete Compose values and states outright that a
missing modules directory is not an error, which the loader has always done and
the contract never said.

Website side: RunicGateway/website#136.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 00:50:17 -05:00
d66ee832c5 Merge pull request 'docs(website): Phase 2 PR 8 — the nav interleave and the feature-provider seam' (#133) from docs/module-nav-interleave into main
Reviewed-on: #133
2026-08-11 05:29:18 +00:00
f740530eb8 docs(website): settle the nav interleave and the feature-provider seam
Records Phase 2 PR 8 of the module system: MODULE_SYSTEM.md gains the PR
entry in 2.7 and the built-it notes on 1.4 and 1.5; MODULE_API.md 3.3 is
amended where building it settled something the draft left open or got wrong.

The amendments to 3.3:

- The pipeline arrow had role/feature filtering BEFORE admin overrides. The
  code has always been the other way round, deliberately - the filter runs
  last so it stays a boundary an override cannot cross (THEMING_AND_NAV 7).
- `feature` was documented as public-area-only. It applies in all three
  areas: core's admin and player navs still carry no flags, but a module row
  that declares a gate and has it silently ignored is a trap.
- How a provider is found: by the module that registered the row, not by a
  prefix parsed out of the flag name. Core's own rows resolve against the
  owner id `core`, which core registers useShardFlags under.
- What a provider hook returns, and that every unknown fails OPEN.
- Why calling one hook per provider in a loop is legal, and why the
  enumerator is a module export rather than a member of registry.
- Six details the interleave settled: unordered rows append rather than
  defaulting to 0; an ungrouped admin row gets its own trailing group rather
  than joining core's; a module-created group is a legal override
  destination; a colliding `to` is dropped with a warning; and why the
  interleave must precede the override merge.

MOD_PATHS' replacement is recorded in both files, including the defect the
derivation fixed: the moderator redirect was a third hardcoded list that
disagreed with MOD_PATHS about /admin/houses. THEMING_AND_NAV 7's
"moderator confinement" note is amended to match.

Code: website PR 8 (client-only; 160 client tests, manifest and OpenAPI
unchanged), verified with the 7.7 browser smoke.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 23:42:21 -05:00
b43b40e71b Merge pull request 'docs(website): Phase 2 PR 7 — the client chunk's delivery contract' (#132) from docs/module-client-registry into main
Reviewed-on: #132
2026-08-11 04:01:28 +00:00
17d8608a7f docs(website): record Phase 2 PR 7 — the client chunk's delivery contract
MODULE_API.md
  - 3.1 gains the four normative constraints PR 7 settled: the static root is
    the entry's directory (an entry in the module root is rejected), the mount
    sits behind the module's state guard with no-cache, the script tag is
    injected before </body> so core's bundle runs first, and core renders on
    DOMContentLoaded with a readyState === 'complete' check
  - 2.1: client.entry must be in a subdirectory; present-but-empty is rejected
  - 3.4: AdminPage struck from the UI kit — core has no such component
  - 7.7 (new): the browser smoke, and the timing bug no test in this repo can
    see. Every test passed against a build that did not work in a browser

MODULE_SYSTEM.md
  - 2.6 step 3 amended to the </body> injection point
  - 2.7 records PR 7's four decisions and what verified them; 1-7 of 9 done

BACKEND_DESIGN.md
  - /modules is the fourth filesystem-conditional static mount outside the
    route manifest, with its root, guard and cache policy stated

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 22:54:39 -05:00
fdede79909 Merge pull request 'docs(website): settle what core publishes about an installed module' (#131) from docs/module-public-endpoint into main
Reviewed-on: #131
2026-08-11 03:16:23 +00:00
6a39ef63c6 docs(website): settle what core publishes about an installed module
Phase 2, PR 6 of MODULE_SYSTEM.md 2.7 — GET /api/v1/public/modules.

MODULE_API.md gains 2.9, the normative shape: four fields (id, name, version,
capabilities) in scan order, and what is deliberately absent. Only started
modules appear, so a disabled or failed one is absent exactly as 4.4 already
leaves its routes and nav; no state, failure_stage or failure_reason reaches an
anonymous caller; no client chunk URL, because htmlShell hands the browser the
tag; an empty array is a real answer, but the 7.6 guard is a 500 and never [].
Also records why it owns the /modules prefix rather than sitting in the
root-mounted site router, where the loader's collision probe could not see it.

6.7 amends MODULE_SYSTEM 2.6 step 4, which said the SPA reads the endpoint "to
learn what to load" — step 3 of the same list had already answered loading a
different way, and 3.1.3 is the normative version. The endpoint feature-detects.
2.6 step 4 now says so, and Part 6's intro no longer claims a fixed count of
amendments.

MODULE_SYSTEM.md 2.7 records PR 6 and restates the phase exit criterion
honestly: no EXISTING URL moves, and PR 6 is the single deliberate addition in
Phase 2. Status line updated — the design is in implementation, not unimplemented.

BACKEND_DESIGN.md documents the route in the /public table and the router in the
folder map, and the published api-route-inventory.json mirror is refreshed to
228 public routes (the prose count was stale at 226).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 22:03:35 -05:00
e733ac0c9c Merge pull request 'docs(website): settle boot/shutdown dispatch and what a boot writes down' (#130) from docs/module-lifecycle into main
Reviewed-on: #130
2026-08-11 02:32:48 +00:00
004e217806 docs(website): settle boot/shutdown dispatch and what a boot writes down
Records phase 2 PR 5 of the module system: the lifecycle hooks a module
registers, how they are dispatched, and what a boot does to installed_modules.

MODULE_API.md 2.5 gains the reconcile's four steps in order, the rules that fall
out of them (the operator's `disabled` wins over any outcome; a bookkeeping
failure is not a boot failure; a module with no onBoot still reaches `started`;
a module whose onBoot threw gets no onShutdown), and why onBoot has no timeout
while onShutdown has a five-second budget -- shutdown races the process being
killed and boot does not.

4.4 gains the failure_stage table: every failure is recorded against the 4.3
step that produced it, so the admin panel can say where a module broke and not
only what the message was.

MODULE_SYSTEM.md 2.4 records the new rule for a row whose directory is gone, and
2.7 the PR 5 progress entry with its four decisions. BACKEND_DESIGN.md's
installed_modules section gains the write path now that one exists.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 20:32:10 -05:00
30589f1fa5 Merge pull request 'docs(website): settle the three de-entanglement registries and what they cost' (#129) from docs/module-registries into main
Reviewed-on: #129
2026-08-10 23:16:46 +00:00
58b435be70 docs(website): settle the three de-entanglement registries and what they cost
Phase 2 PR 4 of MODULE_SYSTEM.md §2.7. Records what §1.8's three entangled files
and §1.9's extension slot actually became, and four decisions taken with them.

MODULE_API.md §2.4:
- registerNotificationStreams takes the catalog ALONE. `mapEvent` was a leftover
  from before §1.8's push inversion was settled — a module owns fromShardEvent
  and calls publish() with an id it resolved, so core never needs a second route
  to the same place. It follows that the public-safety filter is module-internal,
  which is the right home: the kinds, the streams and the filter become one file
  that moves together.
- the entry shape is two booleans, not a single `scope` — that object is the body
  of GET /auth/me/notifications/streams and a shipped Android client reads both.
- registerAnnounceLeg gains `label`, so a module's leg renders in the admin panel
  with no client change; and legs became `announce_job_legs` ROWS, because a
  module cannot ALTER a core table and a registered leg had nowhere to live.
- every call STAGES; nothing commits until the module as a whole is known good.

New §6.5 — the eight grandfathered names (seven stream ids, one leg id), allowed
to `uo` alone by explicit allowlist, the same shape as the loader's legacy table
prefixes. Grandfathering rather than dropping the rule is what keeps it real for
every module written after this one.

New §6.6 — an extension slot is invisible to static analysis, so core needs §6.1's
fragment merge for its OWN slot fills, a phase earlier than the plan expected.
Moving the six users-detail routes behind the slot deleted 407 lines from
swagger-output.json while printing `Success`. Which slots and where each hangs are
both derived — from the registry and from the live express stack — because a
written-down copy drifts.

MODULE_SYSTEM.md §1.8 / §1.9 record the outcome per file, and §2.7 the progress.
BACKEND_DESIGN.md and website-README.md follow the moved files; the PUBLIC_KINDS
reference at §"visibility" named the wrong file and is corrected to
utils/shardBroadcast.js.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 17:51:02 -05:00
bcd3a750e7 Merge pull request 'docs(website): settle how module schema fragments are validated and replayed' (#128) from docs/module-schema-replay into main
Reviewed-on: #128
2026-08-10 22:05:57 +00:00
63e6c2b5d1 docs(website): settle how module schema fragments are validated and replayed
Docs half of website PR 3 (phase 2). MODULE_SYSTEM.md 2.7 gains the PR 3 entry;
MODULE_API.md 2.6 gains the decisions the section did not previously answer.

The one that shapes the code: a fragment is VALIDATED at load time and EXECUTED
later, split on whether a database is needed to know the answer. Everything 2.6
states about the SQL is knowable by reading the file, so breaking one of those
rules costs a module its mount entirely rather than mounting and 503ing with its
tables half created. What is left for the replay is the class of failure only
the server can report, and that is post-mount and answers 503.

Also recorded: the rules are enforced as a leading-verb allowlist (CREATE,
ALTER, INSERT, UPDATE -- the four core's own schema.sql uses) rather than the
DROP denylist 2.6 words them as, because the file is replayed on every boot and
a denylist only ever bans what somebody thought of; the replay sits outside
ensureSchema's wait-for-the-database retry loop, so one module's bad SQL cannot
cost the boot two minutes; partial application is accepted, since MariaDB
self-commits DDL and no transaction could undo it; and `npm run seed` is the one
sanctioned caller that replays nothing, because it never requires app.js and so
has no scan to read.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 16:58:11 -05:00
510d10b297 Merge pull request 'docs(website): settle the module loader's trigger and its collision check' (#127) from docs/module-loader into main
Reviewed-on: #127
2026-08-10 21:30:52 +00:00
d7054fd1f2 Merge pull request 'docs(website): plan the Integration Kit — the module-builder's instruction book' (#126) from docs/module-integration-kit into main
Reviewed-on: #126
2026-08-10 21:30:29 +00:00
9355f2aec4 docs(website): settle the module loader's trigger and its collision check
Records what phase 2 PR 2 decided against the two things MODULE_API.md
left open for it.

7.6 is settled as an explicit modules.load(tierRouters) call in app.js
rather than a require-time scan: the loader needs the tier routers handed
to it for the 4.3 check, which a require-time side effect cannot receive,
and a require's position enforces an ordering constraint invisibly.

4.1 and 4.3 gain the mechanics that fall out -- where the call must sit
in app.js and why in both directions, that mounting is a second pass
after validation, and that core's prefix ownership is probed on the live
tier routers with express's layer.match() rather than declared in a table
that was already stale in the spike.

2.7 records PR 2 as done.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 14:36:22 -05:00
bb0e6a02fe docs(website): plan the Integration Kit, the module-builder's instruction book
RunicGateway/Integration-kit -- empty today, exactly where Module-uo was at the
start of Phase 0 -- becomes the book someone reads to build a module for a game
that is not UO, starting from nothing. It is the only document in the project
written for an audience outside the org.

One book rather than a page in each repo, because the job spans all three layers
of the data path: the website module (the bulk of it), the sidecar and WHY it
exists -- the shard is never network-reachable, it dials out, the wire is a
versioned contract -- and the game-side plugin that feeds it without ever letting
a wedged sidecar stall the game.

The rule that keeps it from rotting: it never re-specifies a contract. MODULE_API.md
stays normative for the module surface and link/PLAN.md + INTEGRATION.md for the
wire protocol; the kit teaches and links out for the authority. A guide that
restates a contract diverges from it silently, and the reader who follows the
divergent copy gets a module that fails validation for reasons the guide cannot
explain.

It trails the implementation rather than leading it -- scaffolded when Phase 2
lands, written against Phase 3's extraction with Module-uo as the worked example,
finished alongside Phase 4 -- and it is a draft until someone builds a working
module for a second game from it alone, without reading core's source.

Adds 2.11, Phase 5 in 2.7, and settled decision 13.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 14:10:41 -05:00
b5277d827c Merge pull request 'docs(website): where the module state machine lives, and how boot treats it' (#125) from docs/module-state-machine into main
Reviewed-on: #125
2026-08-10 19:02:48 +00:00
3510c2ecf1 docs(website): settle where the module state machine lives and how boot treats it
Phase 2 PR 1 of the module system records two things 2.4 left open: the
states are stored in one `state` column rather than a policy flag beside a
runtime one, and every boot recomputes the outcome states while leaving
`disabled` alone.

That second rule is the one with consequences worth writing down -- a
startup_failed module is retried on every restart, so an operator who fixes
the cause needs no admin-panel visit; a running module can never display a
stale failure reason; and disabling, the one operator decision rather than
outcome, survives restarts. Also states what the row does NOT decide: the
loader scans the filesystem before the database is reachable, so the URL
surface is a property of the volume, which is what keeps
routes.manifest.json generatable against a dead database.

BACKEND_DESIGN.md 3 gains the installed_modules columns alongside the other
tables.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 06:35:37 -05:00
27bfdc9152 Merge pull request 'docs(website): the module API contract, validated by the atlas spike (phase 1)' (#124) from docs/module-api into main
Reviewed-on: #124
Reviewed-by: Colby Whitlock <whitlocktech@gmail.com>
2026-08-10 11:16:46 +00:00
037f4abad2 docs(website): record what the atlas spike proved
Part 7 of MODULE_API.md: the three exit criteria and their results, the two
contract changes the spike forced (ctx.express/ctx.validator and
window.__rg.jsxRuntime), the empirical confirmation of the OpenAPI split, the
loader's tested failure guarantees, and the three artifacts in the branch that
are consequences of stopping at six routes rather than intended shape.

Phase 1 is complete: docs/website/MODULE_API.md is written and the spike met
every exit criterion on website branch spike/module-atlas (cut from edge, never
merged).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 05:30:05 -05:00
8db52c3d14 docs(website): settle the OpenAPI fragment merge and the curated UI kit
Both approved by the org lead 2026-08-10. §6.1 moves from open question to
decision A with the per-side obligations spelled out in a new §6.1a: modules
ship a swagger-fragment.json with fully-qualified paths and namespaced schema
keys, core merges started modules' fragments into /api/docs.json at request
time and always wins a key collision, and swagger-output.json stays exactly
what core's own routes generate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 04:52:59 -05:00
2c2a5ccd57 docs(website): add the module API contract (phase 1)
The normative contract between core and an installed module: the `ctx` handed
to a module's entry point, the `register*` calls, the client-side registry and
shared-dependency global, the schema-fragment rules, and the loader's
validation and failure obligations. Every member is derived from what the UO
code actually imports today, re-read against the working tree.

Part 6 records four places the survey contradicted MODULE_SYSTEM.md:

  • OpenAPI generation is STATIC analysis (swagger-autogen parses app.js as
    text), unlike routeManifest.js which walks the live Express stack. A
    filesystem-scanning loader is invisible to it, so module routes would be
    silently absent from swagger-output.json. Three options, one recommended;
    needs a decision before Phase 2.
  • The client contract is much larger than §2.1 implies — the atlas pages
    import five core modules beyond React, so the plan needs a curated UI kit
    and a request primitive on window.__rg.
  • shardVisibility is module-owned and the atlas depends on it, so the spike
    carries it; two copies coexist during the spike by design.
  • Two counts corrected: 27 UO tables (not 25), 6 atlas routes (not 5).

MODULE_SYSTEM.md gains a pointer to the contract and the corrected table count.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 03:44:57 -05:00
07d8390a17 Merge pull request 'docs(website): record the edge branch strategy and the Module-uo repo' (#123) from docs/module-system-edge into main
Reviewed-on: #123
2026-08-10 07:32:55 +00:00
315574d846 docs(website): record the edge branch strategy and the Module-uo repo
Website work lands on an `edge` branch and reaches `main` as a single cutover
at the end -- the same shape used for protocol v3 and the Android theming
workstream. A core that has grown a module loader but not yet lost its UO
code is a coherent state; a core mid-extraction is not.

Adds a Phase 0, because the strategy is blocked on one line of CI config:
pr-checks.yml is `on: pull_request: branches: [main]`, so every PR into edge
would run no checks at all -- the same trap that let all nine Android M12
phase PRs merge with zero CI. It matters more here, since Phase 2's exit
criterion IS a CI result (zero-line routes.manifest.json diff, passing
tests). The fix must land on website main before the first module PR.

Also records the real module repo: RunicGateway/Module-uo (capital M, as
Android-app), currently empty -- no branches, no initial commit -- and
disambiguates the repo name from the module id `uo`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 02:30:45 -05:00
ab6699dad7 Merge pull request 'docs(tree): sync android/PROJECT_TREE.md' (#121) from chore/sync-android-tree into main
Reviewed-on: #121
2026-08-10 07:24:42 +00:00
53b9a2347a Merge pull request 'docs(website): add the module system design of record' (#122) from docs/module-system into main
Reviewed-on: #122
2026-08-10 07:19:35 +00:00
0cc561334c docs(website): add the module system design of record
Turns Runic Gateway from a UO-specific platform into a game-agnostic one:
game-specific routes, tables, screens and nav leave the core website and
become an installable module. Operators install the base site, install the
module for their game, and restart -- they never build anything.

Verified against the working trees rather than written from the draft. The
draft's load-bearing assumptions that did not survive:

  * one flat module route prefix cannot coexist with URL preservation, since
    UO routes span three access tiers -- modules own a named slot per tier
  * there is no server-side nav list, and navOverrides.js refuses to have one,
    so nav registration is client-side
  * the nav feature-gate mechanism is itself the shard visibility system
  * there is no migration system to model a module runner on -- schema.sql is
    replayed idempotently every boot, so modules ship fragments
  * boot/shutdown holds eight UO call sites with no hook to receive them
  * notificationStreams, pushDispatch and announceWorker are entangled, not moves
  * six UO routes are nested under the core users resource
  * the Discord bot has no UO logic at all
  * the installer never contacts the website and its Bundle is hardcoded to
    two components, so delivery is website-side
  * routeManifest and swagger walk app.js with no DB, so modules mount
    synchronously from the filesystem
  * production is a prebuilt pull-only image and CSP forbids inline script,
    which together decide how the client half loads

Ten decisions are recorded as settled in Part 3.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 01:44:29 -05:00
runic-docs-bot
7d452494a4 docs(tree): sync android/PROJECT_TREE.md from RunicGateway/Android-app@c55ee7f [skip ci] 2026-08-08 16:29:11 +00:00
f665f75bbb Merge pull request 'docs(android): M12 theming & navigation, all phases as landed (cutover)' (#120) from edge into main
Reviewed-on: #120
Reviewed-by: Colby Whitlock <whitlocktech@gmail.com>
2026-08-08 16:14:27 +00:00
433a3b920b Merge pull request 'docs(android): M12 phase 8 as landed, and the two defects AC-5 found' (#119) from docs/android-theming-nav-phase-8 into edge
Reviewed-on: #119
Reviewed-by: Colby Whitlock <whitlocktech@gmail.com>
2026-08-08 16:06:28 +00:00
6305d86a01 docs(android): M12 phase 8 as landed, and the two defects AC-5 found
Phase 8 was scoped as docs, coverage and the cutover. The AC-5 walk turned it
into a phase with code in it, which is the outcome the walk existed to produce -
so the record is longer than a phase-8 note would normally be.

THEMING_AND_NAV.md gains "Phase 8 as landed": what the walk confirmed, the two
defects it found and why they are phase 2's trap repeating, the role sweep that
says which Material roles are still unmapped and which of them have a reader, the
coverage-glob narrowing, and the adb-reverse rig note for the next walk. The
phase 2 note is amended where it claimed the card shadow was the milestone's only
visible change to an untouched instance - it is now one of three, and the third
(an untouched instance drawing a hero, because brand.hero carries the env
default) is a correction to the record with no code behind it.

PLAN.md's M12 entry stopped at phase 2; it now runs through 6, records phase 8
including the defects, and drops the same "one deliberate change" claim.

COVERAGE_PLAN.md gains an amendment section explaining why the ui/theme/**
directory glob became wrong the moment M12 put three pure resolvers behind it,
and the general rule it suggests: prefer file globs to directory globs once a
directory is mixed. Its own §5 already forbade excluding testable code.

Pairs with Android-app phase 8.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 11:02:46 -05:00
9091f0c760 Merge pull request 'docs(android): M12 phase 6 as landed' (#118) from docs/android-theming-nav-phase-6 into edge
Reviewed-on: #118
2026-08-08 12:59:18 +00:00